Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Eprmp JLR Construction Aggregates Inc
Eprmp JLR Construction Aggregates Inc
Eprmp JLR Construction Aggregates Inc
MAIN REPORT
Table of Contents
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY................................................................................................................................1
PROJECT FACT SHEET ......................................................................................................................................... 1
PROCESS DOCUMENTATION ................................................................................................................................. 2
EIA TEAM ........................................................................................................................................................ 2
EIA STUDY PROCESS AND SCHEDULE ..................................................................................................................... 2
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY AREA.................................................................................................................. 3
DESCRIPTION OF KEY EIA METHODOLOGIES ........................................................................................................... 5
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION ....................................................................................................................................... 5
SUMMARY OF KEY ISSUES AND CONCERNS RAISED DURING PUBLIC SCOPING ................................................................ 6
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED ................................................................................................................................ 8
SUMMARY OF BASELINE CHARACTERIZATION .......................................................................................................... 9
SUMMARY OF MAIN IMPACTS AND RESIDUAL EFFECTS............................................................................................ 12
RISK AND UNCERTAINTIES RELATED TO THE FINDINGS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR DECISION MAKING ................................... 23
1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION .................................................................................................. 25
1.1 INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................................ 25
1.2 PROJECT LOCATION AND AREA ................................................................................................... 25
1.3 PROJECT ACCESSIBILITY ............................................................................................................. 29
1.4 RATIONALE ............................................................................................................................. 29
1.5 PROJECT ALTERNATIVES ............................................................................................................ 30
1.5.1 Technology Considerations ................................................................................................... 30
1.5.2 Resource Considerations ....................................................................................................... 30
1.5.3 Siting Considerations ............................................................................................................ 30
1.5.4 “No Project” Option .............................................................................................................. 31
1.6 PROJECT COMPONENTS............................................................................................................. 34
1.6.1 Quarry ................................................................................................................................... 34
1.6.2 Material Processing .............................................................................................................. 39
1.7 PROJECT SIZE .......................................................................................................................... 43
1.8 SUPPORT FACILITIES ................................................................................................................. 43
1.8.1 Overhead material conveyor system .................................................................................... 43
1.8.2 Haul Road.............................................................................................................................. 44
1.8.3 Access roads .......................................................................................................................... 44
1.8.4 Cross-drain culverts and Bridges/ Spillways.......................................................................... 44
1.8.5 Contour Canals ...................................................................................................................... 47
1.8.6 Settling Ponds ....................................................................................................................... 47
1.8.7 Lagoons ................................................................................................................................. 48
1.8.8 Soil Dumps or Stockpiles ....................................................................................................... 48
1.8.9 Explosives Magazine ............................................................................................................. 55
1.8.10 Riparian Buffer Zones ............................................................................................................ 55
1.8.11 Bamboo Plantation ............................................................................................................... 55
1.8.12 Biodiversity Protection Area ................................................................................................. 55
1.8.13 Nursery .................................................................................................................................. 56
1.8.14 Administrative Buildings and Workshop ............................................................................... 57
1.8.15 Fuel Storage and Refilling Facility ......................................................................................... 57
1.8.16 Safety Devices ....................................................................................................................... 57
1.8.17 Health Facility ....................................................................................................................... 58
1.8.18 Health Isolation Facility ........................................................................................................ 58
1.8.19 Personnel Safety ................................................................................................................... 59
1.8.20 Safety Statistics ..................................................................................................................... 59
1.8.21 Waste Management Facilities .............................................................................................. 59
1.8.22 Hazardous Waste Management Facility ............................................................................... 59
1.8.23 Equipment ............................................................................................................................. 59
1.9 POWER SUPPLY/ REQUIREMENT ................................................................................................. 66
i
1.10 WATER REQUIREMENT AND SUPPLY ............................................................................................ 66
1.11 PROJECT PROCESS AND TECHNOLOGY .......................................................................................... 67
1.11.1 Quarry / Material Extraction and Transport to Processing Site ............................................ 68
1.11.2 Existing Average Annual Waste Generation ......................................................................... 69
1.12 EMISSION INVENTORY ............................................................................................................... 69
1.13 DEVELOPMENT PLAN, DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT PHASES AND CORRESPONDING TIMEFRAMES ................ 77
1.13.1 Construction of Crusher Line 2 and Overhead Conveyor, and Upgrading of Line 1 .............. 77
1.13.2 Quarry Site Development and Production Operations .......................................................... 77
1.13.3 Mineral Processing ................................................................................................................ 87
1.13.4 Abandonment Phase ............................................................................................................. 94
1.14 PERSONNEL REQUIREMENT ...................................................................................................... 103
1.15 INDICATIVE INVESTMENT COST ................................................................................................. 106
2 ASSESSMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS .............................................................. 108
2.1 THE LAND............................................................................................................................. 108
2.1.1 Land Use and Classification ................................................................................................ 108
2.1.1.1 Impact on Compatibility of Existing Land Use with Proposed Land Use ............................. 109
2.1.1.2 Impact on Nearby Environmentally Critical Areas .............................................................. 109
2.1.1.3 Impact on Existing Land Tenure Issue/s .............................................................................. 115
2.1.1.4 Impairment of visual aesthetics .......................................................................................... 119
2.1.1.5 Devaluation of land value as a result of improper solid waste management and
other related impacts ........................................................................................................ 119
2.1.1.5.1 Quarry Site and Crusher Line 2 Preparation Phase ............................................................. 119
2.1.1.5.2 Crusher Line 1 upgrading, Crusher Line 2 and Conveyor Bridge Construction Phase .......... 119
2.1.1.5.3 Quarry Operations .............................................................................................................. 123
2.1.1.5.4 Crusher Decommissioning ................................................................................................... 123
2.1.1.5.5 Quarry Abandonment and Decommissioning Phase .......................................................... 124
2.1.2 Topography ......................................................................................................................... 125
2.1.3 Elevation ............................................................................................................................. 125
2.1.4 Slope ................................................................................................................................... 131
2.1.4.1 Change in surface Landform, Topography and Slope ......................................................... 131
2.1.4.1.1 Site Preparation Phase ........................................................................................................ 132
2.1.4.1.2 Quarry Operations Phase .................................................................................................... 132
2.1.4.1.3 Abandonment Phase ........................................................................................................... 132
2.1.4.2 Soil Erosion/ Loss of Soil/Topsoil/Overburden .................................................................... 133
2.1.4.2.1 During site preparation phase ............................................................................................ 133
2.1.4.2.2 During quarry operations phase ......................................................................................... 133
2.1.4.2.3 Abandonment Phase ........................................................................................................... 134
2.1.5 Geology ............................................................................................................................... 134
2.1.5.1 Tectonic Setting .................................................................................................................. 134
2.1.5.2 Structural Geology .............................................................................................................. 135
2.1.5.3 Geomorphology .................................................................................................................. 140
2.1.5.4 Stratigraphy ........................................................................................................................ 143
2.1.5.5 Site Geology ........................................................................................................................ 147
2.1.5.6 Geohazards ......................................................................................................................... 152
2.1.6 Pedology ............................................................................................................................. 164
2.1.7 Terrestrial Ecology .............................................................................................................. 171
2.2 THE WATER ENVIRONMENT ..................................................................................................... 276
2.2.1 Hydrology ............................................................................................................................ 276
2.2.2 Natural Drainage System and Average Stream Depth........................................................ 276
2.2.3 Depletion of Surface Water Resources / Water Resource Competition .............................. 277
2.2.4 Sedimentation of Surface Waterways ................................................................................ 289
2.2.5 Siltation and Change in Stream Depth ................................................................................ 291
2.2.6 Sediment Transport Model ................................................................................................. 293
2.2.7 Change in Drainage Morphology ........................................................................................ 296
2.2.8 Groundwater Resources ...................................................................................................... 299
ii
2.2.9 Water Quality ..................................................................................................................... 302
2.2.10 Freshwater Ecology ............................................................................................................. 324
2.2.11 Oceanography and Marine Ecology .................................................................................... 340
2.3 THE AIR ............................................................................................................................... 345
2.3.1 CHARACTERIZATION OF AIR QUALITY ......................................................................................... 345
2.3.2 METEOROLOGY/CLIMATOLOGY ................................................................................................ 345
2.3.2.1 GENERAL CLIMATE ................................................................................................................. 345
2.3.3 RAINFALL ............................................................................................................................. 347
2.3.4 TEMPERATURE ...................................................................................................................... 347
2.3.5 RELATIVE HUMIDITY ............................................................................................................... 350
2.3.6 WIND PATTERNS, SPEED, AND DIRECTION .................................................................................. 350
2.3.7 EXTREME WEATHER ............................................................................................................... 353
2.3.8 PROJECT POLLUTANTS............................................................................................................. 353
2.3.9 EMISSION INVENTORY SCOPE 1................................................................................................. 354
2.3.9.1 EMISSION FACTORS ................................................................................................................ 356
2.3.9.1.1 UNPAVED ROADS................................................................................................................... 356
2.3.9.1.2 PARTICULATE EMISSIONS ......................................................................................................... 356
2.3.9.1.3 DIESEL FUEL.......................................................................................................................... 357
2.3.9.2 EMISSION ESTIMATES FOR SELECTED YEARS ................................................................................ 357
2.3.10 GREENHOUSE GAS (GHG) EMISSIONS INVENTORY, SCOPE 2 .......................................................... 362
2.3.11 CLIMATE CHANGE PROJECTION FOR CEBU................................................................................... 364
2.3.12 CHANGE IN LOCAL MICRO-CLIMATE........................................................................................... 365
2.3.13 AIR QUALITY ......................................................................................................................... 367
2.3.13.1 2004 BASELINE AIR QUALITY ................................................................................................... 369
2.3.13.2 AIR QUALITY MONITORING...................................................................................................... 370
2.3.13.3 ANOVA -P ANALYSIS OF TIME SERIES AIR QUALITY MONITORING DATA ............................................... 371
2.3.14 2021 BASELINE NOISE LEVEL ................................................................................................... 371
2.3.15 NOISE MONITORING .............................................................................................................. 373
2.3.16 INCREASED PROJECT NOISE GENERATION POTENTIAL .................................................................... 375
2.3.17 SUMMARY OF ASSESSED AIR QUALITY IMPACTS AND MITIGATING MEASURES ................................... 381
2.4 THE PEOPLE .......................................................................................................................... 384
2.4.1 The Impact Population ........................................................................................................ 384
2.4.2 Impact Settlements Map..................................................................................................... 384
2.4.3 Land Area of the City of Naga, Cebu ................................................................................... 384
2.4.3.1 Land Area of The Municipality of Minglanilla, Cebu ........................................................... 392
2.4.4 Demographics ..................................................................................................................... 393
2.4.4.1 Population Growth .............................................................................................................. 393
2.4.4.1.1 The City of Naga.................................................................................................................. 393
2.4.4.1.2 Municipality of Minglanilla ................................................................................................. 394
2.4.4.2 Population Density .............................................................................................................. 395
2.4.4.2.1 The City of Naga.................................................................................................................. 395
2.4.4.2.2 Municipality of Minglanilla ................................................................................................. 395
2.4.4.3 Gender and Age Profile ....................................................................................................... 396
2.4.4.3.1 The City of Naga.................................................................................................................. 396
2.4.4.3.2 The Municipality of Minglanilla .......................................................................................... 396
2.4.5 Profile of Educational Services ............................................................................................ 397
2.4.5.1 The City of Naga.................................................................................................................. 397
2.4.5.2 Municipality of Minglanilla ................................................................................................. 397
2.4.6 Literacy Rate ....................................................................................................................... 397
2.4.6.1 The City of Naga.................................................................................................................. 397
2.4.6.2 The Municipality of Minglanilla .......................................................................................... 398
2.4.7 Profile of Educational Attainment ...................................................................................... 398
2.4.7.1 The City of Naga.................................................................................................................. 398
2.4.7.2 The Municipality of Minglanilla .......................................................................................... 398
2.4.8 Housing ............................................................................................................................... 401
2.4.8.1 The City of Naga.................................................................................................................. 401
iii
2.4.8.2 The Municipality of Minglanilla .......................................................................................... 402
2.4.9 Availability of Housing ........................................................................................................ 402
2.4.9.1 City of Naga ........................................................................................................................ 402
2.4.9.2 The Municipality of Minglanilla .......................................................................................... 402
2.4.10 Agriculture .......................................................................................................................... 403
2.4.10.1 Naga City ............................................................................................................................ 403
2.4.10.2 Minglanilla .......................................................................................................................... 406
2.4.11 Employment ........................................................................................................................ 408
2.4.11.1 The City of Naga.................................................................................................................. 408
2.4.11.2 The Municipality of Minglanilla .......................................................................................... 413
2.4.12 Environmental Health and Sanitation Profile ..................................................................... 415
2.4.12.1 The City of Naga.................................................................................................................. 415
2.4.12.2 The Municipality of Minglanilla .......................................................................................... 416
2.4.13 Morbidity Rates .................................................................................................................. 418
2.4.13.1 City of Naga ........................................................................................................................ 418
2.4.13.2 Municipality of Minglanilla ................................................................................................. 420
2.4.14 Mortality Rates ................................................................................................................... 420
2.4.14.1 City of Naga ........................................................................................................................ 420
2.4.15 Infant and Children Mortality ............................................................................................. 422
2.4.15.1 City of Naga ........................................................................................................................ 422
2.4.15.2 Municipality of Minglanilla ................................................................................................. 422
2.4.16 Basic Services and Utilities .................................................................................................. 423
2.4.17 Availability of Health Services ............................................................................................. 423
2.4.17.1 The City of Naga.................................................................................................................. 423
2.4.17.2 The Municipality of Minglanilla .......................................................................................... 424
2.4.18 Water Sources ..................................................................................................................... 425
2.4.18.1 The City of Naga.................................................................................................................. 425
2.4.18.2 The Municipality of Minglanilla .......................................................................................... 427
2.4.19 Project impact on existing disease profile including weather sensitive diseases and
impact aggravation as a result of climate change ............................................................ 428
2.4.20 Power .................................................................................................................................. 429
2.4.20.1 The City of Naga.................................................................................................................. 429
2.4.20.2 Projected Number of Connections ...................................................................................... 429
2.4.20.3 Power/ Transmission Distribution line ................................................................................ 429
2.4.20.4 Power Substations .............................................................................................................. 432
2.4.21 Communication and Transportation ................................................................................... 432
2.4.21.1 The City of Naga.................................................................................................................. 432
2.4.22 Communication Services Facilities ...................................................................................... 432
2.4.23 Transportation Facilities ..................................................................................................... 432
2.4.24 The Municipality of Minglanilla .......................................................................................... 433
2.4.25 Communication Services ..................................................................................................... 433
2.4.26 Transportation .................................................................................................................... 433
2.4.27 Commercial Establishments ................................................................................................ 433
2.4.27.1 The City of Naga.................................................................................................................. 433
2.4.27.2 The Municipality of Minglanilla .......................................................................................... 435
2.4.28 Peace and Order ................................................................................................................. 436
2.4.28.1 The City of Naga.................................................................................................................. 436
2.4.28.2 The Municipality of Minglanilla .......................................................................................... 437
2.4.29 Recreational/Sports Facilities ............................................................................................. 437
2.4.29.1 The City of Naga.................................................................................................................. 437
2.4.29.2 The Municipality of Minglanilla .......................................................................................... 437
2.4.30 Crime Incidence ................................................................................................................... 439
2.4.30.1 The City of Naga.................................................................................................................. 439
2.4.30.2 The Municipality of Minglanilla .......................................................................................... 439
2.4.31 Existing Transportation/ Traffic Situation ........................................................................... 439
2.4.31.1 The City of Naga.................................................................................................................. 439
iv
2.4.31.2 The Municipality of Minglanilla .......................................................................................... 440
2.4.32 Road and Network Systems ................................................................................................ 440
2.4.32.1 The City of Naga.................................................................................................................. 440
2.4.33 Road Accidents.................................................................................................................... 442
2.4.33.1 The Municipality of Minglanilla .......................................................................................... 442
2.4.34 Traffic Congestion ............................................................................................................... 442
2.4.35 Impact on Public Access ...................................................................................................... 443
2.4.36 Inventory of Physical Cultural Resources and Landscapes .................................................. 444
2.4.36.1 City of Naga ........................................................................................................................ 444
2.4.36.2 Municipality of Minglanilla ................................................................................................. 445
2.4.37 Impacts on Physical Cultural Resources .............................................................................. 446
2.4.38 Profile of the MPSA-Host Barangays................................................................................... 446
2.4.38.1 Perception Survey ............................................................................................................... 446
2.4.39 Household Survey of Impact Barangays ............................................................................. 448
2.4.40 Perception Survey ............................................................................................................... 448
2.4.41 Poverty ................................................................................................................................ 457
2.4.42 Food Security....................................................................................................................... 458
2.4.43 Displacement of Settlers ..................................................................................................... 462
2.4.44 Disturbance of Properties ................................................................................................... 462
2.4.45 Change in Land Ownership ................................................................................................. 464
2.4.46 Change in Right of Way ...................................................................................................... 465
2.4.47 In-migration and Proliferation of Informal Settlers ............................................................ 466
2.4.48 Changes to Culture/Lifestyle of Indigenous Peoples ........................................................... 466
2.4.49 Threat to Delivery of Basic Services/ Resource Competition ............................................... 467
2.4.50 Threat to Public Health and Safety ..................................................................................... 467
2.4.51 Generation of Local Benefits ............................................................................................... 468
2.4.52 Enhancement of Employment and Livelihood Opportunities .............................................. 468
2.4.53 Increased Business Opportunities and Associated Economic Activities .............................. 468
2.4.54 Increased Revenue of LGUs ................................................................................................. 469
2.4.55 Summary Impact Assessment on the People Environment ................................................. 470
3 ENVIRONMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT .......................................................................... 476
3.1 INTRODUCTION...................................................................................................................... 476
3.2 COVERAGE LEVELS & REQUIREMENTS UNDER ANNEX 2-7E (DAO 2003-30) .................................... 476
3.3 RISK SCREENING ASSESSMENT .................................................................................................. 477
3.4 RISK ASSESSMENT .................................................................................................................. 478
3.4.1 Risk Identification ............................................................................................................... 478
3.4.2 The Consequence Description ............................................................................................. 486
3.4.3 Consequence Rating............................................................................................................ 487
3.4.4 Likelihood Rating ................................................................................................................ 487
3.4.5 Level of Risk or Risk Rating.................................................................................................. 488
3.5 JLRCAI SAFETY, HEALTH & EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS & RESPONSE PROGRAM .............................. 488
3.5.1 Existing Control/ Proposed Controls ................................................................................... 489
3.5.2 JLR Health and Safety Program ........................................................................................... 489
3.5.3 Organizational Safety Rules – Control of Hazards .............................................................. 493
3.5.4 Safety and Health Training ................................................................................................. 504
3.5.5 Accident/Incident Investigation .......................................................................................... 504
3.5.6 Emergency Response Program ........................................................................................... 506
3.5.7 Accident Statistics ............................................................................................................... 508
3.6 ASSESSMENT OF THE EXISTING OPERATIONAL CONTROLS ............................................................... 511
3.7 RISK ASSESSMENT MATRIX ...................................................................................................... 512
3.7.1 Risk Management Requirement ......................................................................................... 525
3.8 RISK MANAGEMENT ............................................................................................................... 525
3.8.1 Implementing the Risk Management System ..................................................................... 525
4 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN ...................................................................... 536
v
4.1 ACTIVITIES, IMPACTS & MITIGATION/MEASURES IN VARIOUS PHASES OF PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION ... 536
4.1.1 Site Preparation, Pre-Operation Phase ............................................................................... 536
4.1.2 Terrestrial Ecology .............................................................................................................. 536
4.1.3 Loss of Topsoil ..................................................................................................................... 538
4.1.4 Water Resource Management and Water Quality ............................................................. 539
4.1.5 Air Quality ........................................................................................................................... 540
4.1.6 The People........................................................................................................................... 540
4.2 MINERAL EXTRACTION (PRODUCTION OPERATION) PHASE............................................................. 541
4.2.1 Land .................................................................................................................................... 542
4.2.2 Water Quality, Resource Management and Utilization and Flooding ................................ 543
4.2.3 Air and Air Quality ............................................................................................................... 544
4.2.4 People ................................................................................................................................. 545
4.2.5 Threat to Delivery of Basic Services and Resource Use Competition .................................. 546
4.2.6 Local Economy .................................................................................................................... 547
4.3 REHABILITATION AND ABANDONMENT PHASE ............................................................................. 547
4.3.1 Physical Aspect.................................................................................................................... 547
4.3.2 Biological Aspect ................................................................................................................. 548
4.3.3 Socio Economic Aspect ........................................................................................................ 550
5 SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND IEC PLAN ................................................................ 570
5.1 SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM ACCOMPLISHMENT ............................................. 570
5.2 INDICATIVE SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN .................................................................................... 576
5.2.1 The Social Development Plan Components ......................................................................... 576
5.2.2 Funding the Social Development Program .......................................................................... 588
5.3 INFORMATION AND EDUCATION CAMPAIGN ................................................................................ 588
6 STATUS OF ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE ................................................................ 598
6.1 TREND IN ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS.................................................................................... 607
6.1.1 Water Quality ..................................................................................................................... 607
6.1.2 Air Quality ........................................................................................................................... 613
6.1.3 Noise ................................................................................................................................... 614
6.1.4 Complaints Received ........................................................................................................... 615
6.1.5 MMT Requirements ............................................................................................................ 619
6.2 MONITORING OF PROJECT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS UNDER THE EXPANDED QUARRY PRODUCTION .... 619
6.2.1 During site development / construction phase: .................................................................. 620
6.2.2 During Operations ............................................................................................................... 621
6.2.3 Abandonment Phase ........................................................................................................... 622
6.2.4 Air Quality Impact Monitoring Stations .............................................................................. 630
6.2.5 Self-Monitoring ................................................................................................................... 630
6.3 MULTI-SECTORAL MONITORING OPERATIONS ............................................................................. 631
6.3.1 Duties of the EMB ............................................................................................................... 632
6.3.2 Implementation of the Duties and Functions of the MMT .................................................. 633
6.3.3 Environmental Guarantee Fund .......................................................................................... 634
6.3.4 Rehabilitation Cash Fund (RCF). .......................................................................................... 636
6.3.5 Monitoring Trust Fund ........................................................................................................ 636
6.3.6 Grievance and Redress Mechanism (GRM) ......................................................................... 636
7. DECOMMISSIONING / ABANDONMENT / REHABILITATION POLICY ............................. 639
7.1 POST-CONSTRUCTION DECOMMISSIONING ................................................................................. 639
7.2 PROJECT DECOMMISSIONING/ABANDONMENT ............................................................................ 639
8. INSTITUTIONAL PLAN FOR EMP IMPLEMENTATION ..................................................... 643
8.1 PRE-CONSTRUCTION, CONSTRUCTION AND SITE DEVELOPMENT PHASE ............................................ 643
8.2 CONSTRUCTION PHASE ........................................................................................................... 643
8.3 QUARRY PRODUCTION AND CRUSHING OPERATIONS .................................................................... 643
8.3.1 JLRCAI General Manager GM ............................................................................................. 643
vi
8.3.2 Mining Consultant............................................................................................................... 643
8.3.3 Quarry and Aggregates Division (QAD) Manager ............................................................... 643
8.3.4 Safety Officer ...................................................................................................................... 643
8.3.5 Mine Environmental Protection & Enhancement Officer (MEPEO) .................................... 644
8.3.6 The PCO Pollution Control Officer (PCO) ............................................................................. 645
8.3.7 The Community Relations Manager ................................................................................... 645
8.4 ADDITIONAL OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH AND SAFETY FACILITIES ........................................................ 646
LIST OF TABLES
x
Table 2.4- 14 Housing Situation for the Past Three Censal Years (2000, 2010
& 2015)........................................................................................... 402
Table 2.4- 15 Number of Housing Units by Occupancy in Minglanilla, 1960-
1990................................................................................................ 403
Table 2.4- 16 Occupied Housing Units in Minglanilla, 1960 - 2015 ................... 403
Table 2.4- 17 Major & Minor Agricultural Occupations/Groups in Barangay
Cogon & Lanas, 2015 ................................................................... 404
Table 2.4- 18 Existing Livestock and Poultry Farms in Barangay Cogon and
Lanas, 2015.................................................................................... 404
Table 2.4- 19 Major Agricultural Crops of City of Naga ................................... 405
Table 2.4- 20 Major Agricultural Crops of Minglanilla, 2000 ............................. 406
Table 2.4- 21 Estimated Livestock & Poultry Population on Backyard
Raising in Minglanilla .................................................................... 408
Table 2.4- 22 Labor Force Population in Naga by Sex and Employment
Status, 2015.................................................................................... 408
Table 2.4- 23 Employment by Type/Classification of Business and Trade in
Naga, 2019 .................................................................................... 409
Table 2.4- 24 Projected School-Age Population, Labor Force, and
Dependent Population, Naga .................................................... 410
Table 2.4- 25 Employment by Type of Economic Activity, 2015 ...................... 411
Table 2.4- 26 Overseas Workers from Naga, 2011-2015 ................................... 412
Table 2.4- 27 Number of Households With and Without Toilets by Selected
Barangays in Minglanilla, 1990 .................................................... 416
Table 2.4- 28 Number of Households by Kind of Toilet Facility Being Used,
1990................................................................................................ 416
Table 2.4- 29 Number of Households by Usual Manner of Garbage
Disposal, 1990 ................................................................................ 417
Table 2.4- 30 Garbage Dumped in FDR-CON Private Landfill ......................... 418
Table 2.4- 31 Five-Year Top Morbidity Causes, City of Naga 2011 to 2015 .... 419
Table 2.4- 32 Top Morbidity Causes, Municipality of Minglanilla, 1995 ........... 420
Table 2.4- 33 Top Causes of Mortality 2011 - 2015, Naga City......................... 421
Table 2.4- 34 Top Causes of Mortality, Municipality of Minglanilla, 2000 ........ 423
Table 2.4- 35 Number of Households by Main Source of Water Supply for
Drinking in Naga, 2015 ................................................................. 425
Table 2.4- 36 Levels of Water Systems in the Philippines .................................. 426
Table 2.4- 37 Level II Water Supply System in Cogon and Lanas, 2015
(Pump) ........................................................................................... 426
Table 2.4- 38 Ten-Year Projected Water Demand of Naga by Specific Use
....................................................................................................... 427
Table 2.4- 39 Number of Households by Main Source of Water Supply for
Drinking in Minglanilla, 2015 ......................................................... 427
Table 2.4- 40 Households in Naga Served in Electricity, 2013-2015 ................. 430
Table 2.4- 41 Number of Connections and Average Consumptions, 2013-
2015................................................................................................ 431
Table 2.4- 42 Inventory of Public Land Transportation Vehicles in Naga by
Type and Service Route, 2015 ..................................................... 431
Table 2.4- 43 Inventory of Commercial Establishment by Economic
Activities in Naga .......................................................................... 434
Table 2.4- 44 List of Large Commercial Establishments and Banks in City of
Naga (2015) .................................................................................. 434
Table 2.4- 45 List of Establishments and Banks in Minglanilla (2000) ............... 435
xi
Table 2.4- 46 Crime Incidence Among Adults in City of Naga, 2011-2015 .... 438
Table 2.4- 47 Crime Incidence for Children In Conflict with the Law in
Naga, 2011-2015 ........................................................................... 438
Table 2.4- 48 Crime Index of Minglanilla, 2018 ................................................. 439
Table 2.4- 49 Roads Used by JLR for Hauling Products .................................... 441
Table 2.4- 50 Road Accidents in Barangay Cogon and Lanas, 2011-2015.... 442
Table 2.4- 51 Inventory of Roads in Brgy. Guindaruhan and Camp 8 ............ 442
Table 2.4- 52 Traffic Contribution of Project Haul Trucks .................................. 443
Table 2.4- 53 Cultural and Tourism Activities/Festivals...................................... 445
Table 2.4- 54 MPSA-Host Barangay Profile Summary ....................................... 446
Table 2.4. 54-1 Determining the Household Survey Sampling Size ..................... 448
Table 2.4- 55 Schedule of IEC Activities ............................................................ 448
Table 2.4- 56 Sectoral Affiliation of Representatives in the IEC Activities ....... 449
Table 2.4- 57 Summary of Proceedings from Community Consultation/ IEC
....................................................................................................... 450
Table 2.4- 58 Community Requests to JLR Received during Community
Consultation / IEC Activities ......................................................... 454
Table 2.4- 59 Percent Distribution of Households by Food Security Status
and Demographic Characteristics, Philippines, 2015 ................ 460
Table 2.4- 60 Property Owners Within the Proposed Expanded Production
Area ............................................................................................... 463
Table 2.4- 61 Status of Land Ownership Within the Proposed Expanded
Quarry Area .................................................................................. 464
Table 2.4- 62 Summary of Impact Assessment on the People Environment .. 470
Table 3.3- 1 Risk Assessment Level Screening ................................................. 477
Table 3.4- 1 Basic Friction Angle (Static) of Various Rock Types ................... 480
Table 3.4-2 ANFO Deliveries and Consumption, 2019 to 2021 ..................... 484
Table 3.4-3 Estimated ANFO Requirement for Expanded Quarry
Production ..................................................................................... 485
Table 3.4- 4 Quantitative Weights of Consequence...................................... 487
Table 3.4- 5 Quantitative Measures of Likelihood .......................................... 487
Table 3.4.6 Quantitative Risk Rating ............................................................... 488
Table 3.5- 1 JLR Company Safety Policy ......................................................... 489
Table 3.5- 2 Emergency Response Team Organizational Structure .............. 492
Table 3.5- 3 Existing Evacuation Areas ............................................................ 506
Table 3.5- 4 Responsible Persons and their Role During Major Disaster
Situation ......................................................................................... 507
Table 3.5- 5 Summary of Accidents in the Workplace, 2015 to 2020 ............ 508
Table 3.5- 6 Details of JLR Accident / Incident Statistics ................................ 509
Table 3.6- 1 Analysis of Risks During Site Preparation & Construction
Phase ............................................................................................. 512
Table 3.6- 2 Analysis of Risks of Quarry Operation and Aggregate
Processing Phase .......................................................................... 515
Table 3.6- 3 Analysis of Risks During Abandonment Phase ............................ 521
Table 3.7-1 Required Risk Management Response Rate .............................. 525
Table 3.7- 2 List of the Identified Hazards and Aspects with their
Corresponding Operational Controls ......................................... 526
Table 3.7- 3 Risk Management – Safety .......................................................... 532
Table 4. 2 Summary of Environmental Management Plan ......................... 553
Table 5. 1 Accomplished/Previous Social Development Management
Programs ....................................................................................... 570
xii
Table 5. 2 Analysis of Sectoral Distribution of JLR SDMP 2005-2018 ............ 572
Table 5. 3 Analysis of JLR SDMP Actual Cost Against Budget, 2005-2029
....................................................................................................... 576
Table 5. 4 Sample List of Common Commodities Requirement ................ 584
Table 5. 5 Indicative Social Development Program, 2022 to 2029 ............ 590
Table 5. 6 Matrix of Indicative IEC Plan ........................................................ 593
Table 5. 7 Indicative Annual Budget for SDMP and IEC Activities ............. 597
Table 6. 1 Summary Status of Project Compliance to ECC Conditions..... 599
Table 6. 2 Summary Status of Project Compliance to EMP and EMoP
Commitments ............................................................................... 604
Table 6.3 Comparison of 2004 and 2021 Water Quality Baseline Data.... 609
Table 6. 4 Updated Water Quality Impact Monitoring Locations .............. 611
Table 6.5 Result of Air Quality Sampling, February 2021 ............................ 613
Table 6. 6 Matrix of Complaints Received, 2018 to 2020 ............................ 615
Table 6. 7 Summary of MMT Discussions and Recommendations in
Selected Meetings, 2019 and 2020 ............................................. 617
Table 6.8 Regular Freshwater Ecosystem Monitoring locations ................ 622
Table 6.9 Summary of Environmental Compliance Monitoring Plan ........ 624
Table 6. 4 Location of Air Quality Monitoring Stations ................................ 630
Table 6. 5 Project Environmental Fund Commitments ................................ 635
Table 7. 1 Disposition of Project Facilities at End of Project Life ................. 640
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1 EIA Process and Activity Schedule .................................................. 3
Figure 1. 1 Project Location and Environmental Impact Study Area
Map ................................................................................................. 26
Figure 1. 2 Map Showing Existing and Proposed Quarry Expansion, In-Pit
Crusher and Conveyor Line ........................................................... 27
Figure 1. 3 Roads Connecting the JLR Project Site with National
Highways ......................................................................................... 32
Figure 1. 4 Mine Development Plan ................................................................ 33
Figure 1. 5 Project Buffer Zones ........................................................................ 36
Figure 1. 6 Typical Bench Profile ...................................................................... 38
Figure 1. 7 Existing Crusher 1 Plant Lay-out ..................................................... 40
Figure 1. 1 Crushing Line 1 Plant Lay-out in 2004 ............................................ 41
Figure 1. 9 Example of the Elevation of Reinforced Concrete Culvert for
Waterway Crossing......................................................................... 44
Figure 1. 10 Crushing Plant Water System Schematic Flow Diagram ............. 50
Figure 1. 11 Soil Dumpsite Location Selection Criteria ..................................... 52
Figure 1. 12 Perimeter Piled Rocks to Control Siltation from Soil Stockpile ..... 52
Figure 1. 13 Explosives Magazine Lay-out ......................................................... 54
Figure 1. 2 Average Annual Percentage Distribution of Generated
Waste Types 2018-2020................................................................... 69
Figure 1. 15 Process Flow & Waste Streams, Site Preparation &
Construction Phase ........................................................................ 71
Figure 1. 16 Process Flow and Waste Stream, Quarry Operations ................. 74
Figure 1. 17 Process Flow & Waste Stream, Overall Project ............................. 75
Figure 1. 18 Timeline of Project Activities .......................................................... 76
Figure 1. 19 Plan View of a Staggered Drilling Pattern .................................... 79
xiii
Figure 1. 20 Sectional View of the Drilling Pattern ............................................ 80
Figure 1. 21 Typical Charged Blast Hole with Non-electric Detonators .......... 80
Figure 1. 22 Blasting Activity Process Flow......................................................... 81
Figure 1. 23 First 5-Years Quarry Slicing Plan .................................................... 82
Figure 1. 24 Profile of First 5 Years Slicing Plan................................................... 83
Figure 1. 25 Final Mine Plan (2029)..................................................................... 85
Figure 1. 26 Section Profile (A-A) of Final Mine Plan ......................................... 86
Figure 1. 5 3D Perspective of Crusher Line 2 Lay-out Plan ............................. 90
Figure 1. 28 Feed Hopper of Conveying System from Line 2 Crusher ............ 91
Figure 1. 29 Discharge Chute of Conveying System........................................ 92
Figure 1. 30 Map Showing Rehabilitation Areas of First 4 Years
Decommissioning Activity .............................................................. 99
Figure 1.31 Section Profile of Final Mine Plan (2029) .................................... 100
Figure 1.32 Final Quarry Rehabilitation Schedule.......................................... 102
Figure 2.1-1 Land Use Zoning Map Naga City ................................................ 110
Figure 2.1-2 Location of Project Area Relative to Central Cebu Protected
Landscape .................................................................................... 111
Figure 2.1-3 Location of Mt. Naupa Relative to JLR Proposed Quarry
Expansion Area ............................................................................. 112
Figure 2.1-4 Land Classification Map of Naga City Showing Proposed
Quarry Expansion Area ................................................................ 113
Figure 2.1-5 Land Tenure Map of Naga City................................................... 114
Figure 2.1-6 Google Earth Image Showing the Location of Proposed
Quarry Expansion Area ................................................................ 118
Figure 2.1-7 Baseline Topography, Year 2021 ................................................. 127
Figure 2.1-8 Elevation in Project Site at Final Mine Rehabilitation Stage ...... 128
Figure 2.1-9 Baseline Slope Map of Proposed Expanded Production Area
....................................................................................................... 129
Figure 2.1-10 Slope Map of Final Mine Plan ...................................................... 130
Figure 2.1-11 Philippine Sea Plate and Relative Plate Motion ......................... 136
Figure 2.1-13 Synthetic profile across Panay, Negros & Cebu islands
showing structural relationship between continental
platform & Visayan Sea Basin ...................................................... 138
Figure 2.1-14 Distribution of Active Faults and Trenches .................................. 139
Figure 2.1-15 Geomorphological Map of Naga and Minglanilla Area .......... 142
Figure 2.1-16 Stratigraphy of Project Site........................................................... 143
Figure 2.1-17 Geologic Map of the Project Site.............................................. 146
Figure 2.1-18 Location of Drill Holes in Mineral Exploration .............................. 149
Figure 2.1-19 Result of Borehole Investigation .................................................. 150
Figure 2.1. 20 Seismicity Map of Visayas ............................................................ 151
Figure 2.1-21 Location of Nearest Fault Trace .................................................. 154
Figure 2.1-23 Map of Active Philippine Volcanos ............................................. 158
Figure 2.1-24 Naga City, Cebu Tsunami Hazard Map...................................... 159
Figure 2.1-25 Flooding Hazard Map .................................................................. 160
Figure 2.1-26 Soil Map of MPSA .......................................................................... 161
Figure 2.1-27 Soil Fertility Map ............................................................................ 162
Figure 2.1-28 Sampling Locations for Soil, Water and Air ................................. 163
Figure 2.1-29 Vegetative Cover Map of Production Area .............................. 169
Figure 2.1-30 Soil Vegetation Cover Map, JLR 2004 EIS ................................... 170
Figure 2.1-31 Sampling Map of 2021 Flora Survey ............................................ 173
Figure 2.1-32 Representative Photos of Flora Sampling Locations .................. 174
xiv
Figure 2.1-33 Land Cover Description of Sampling Sites per 2015 FMB
Digital Land Cover Dataset ......................................................... 175
Figure 2.1-34 Illustration of Nested Quadrat Sampling Design Used ............... 177
Figure 2.1-35 Tree Species Composition from 20mx20m Quadrats ................. 186
Figure 2.1-36 Relative Tree Age Class Distribution Based on the DBH............. 189
Figure 2.1-37 Tree Classification based on DHB (FMB TB No.3) ........................ 190
Figure 2.1-38 Tree Species Composition from 20mx20m Quadrats ................. 191
Figure 2.1-39 Tree Species Composition in Understorey Quadrats (5mx5m)
....................................................................................................... 192
Figure 2.1-40 Map of Established Transects for Avifauna Survey .................... 239
Figure 2.1-41 Map of Survey Points for Murids and Bats ................................... 240
Figure 2.1-42 Graph of Bird Species Density ..................................................... 244
Figure 2.2- 1 Proclaimed and Critical Watersheds in the Province of Cebu
....................................................................................................... 278
Figure 2.2- 2 Bigger Watershed Map of Naga City ......................................... 279
Figure 2.2- 3 Watershed Catchments Within MPSA 194-2004-VII.................... 280
Figure 2.2- 4 Sub-watershed Catchments Draining through the
Production Area ........................................................................... 282
Figure 2.2- 5 Micro-watershed Catchments and Surface Flow Directions
within the Proposed Expanded Quarry ...................................... 282
Figure 2.2- 6 Overlay of Natural Waterways Map with Geologic Map ........ 283
Figure 2.2- 7 Hydrogeologic Map ..................................................................... 284
Figure 2.2- 8 Location map of Sedimentation Study Monitoring Stations ..... 294
Figure 2.2- 9 Sediment Deposition Pattern ....................................................... 295
Figure 2.2- 10 Location of Existing Settling Ponds and Silt Traps ...................... 305
Figure 2.2- 11 Location map of Air, Water, Limnologic and Soil Quality
Sampling........................................................................................ 306
Figure 2.2- 12 Residential clusters located upstream of water quality
sampling sites. ............................................................................... 309
Figure 2.2- 13 Comparison of Baseline Dissolved Oxygen and BOD5
Concentration .............................................................................. 311
Figure 2.2- 14 Comparison of TSS Baseline Information (2004 & 2021) ............. 312
Figure 2.2- 15 Comparison of Phosphate, Nitrate and Ammonia Baseline
Information (2004 & 2021) ............................................................ 313
314
Figure 2.2- 16 Comparison of Heavy Metals Baseline Information (2004 &
2021) .............................................................................................. 314
Figure 2.2- 17 Comparison of Oil & Grease, Surfactants and Phenols
Baseline Information (2004 & 2021) ............................................. 315
Figure 2.2- 18 Comparison of Fecal Coliform Bacteria Baseline (2004 &
2021) .............................................................................................. 316
Figure 2.2- 19 Location Map of Regular TSS Monitoring Stations ...................... 319
Figure 2.2-21 Percentage Composition of Phytoplankton Genera ................ 328
Figure 2.2-22 Total Phytoplankton Density and Richness ................................. 330
Figure 2.2- 23 Percentage composition of zooplankton taxa in the five
sampling stations .......................................................................... 331
Figure 2.2- 24 Total Zooplankton Density and Taxa Richness ........................... 332
Figure 2.2- 25 Percent Composition of Macrobenthos ..................................... 334
Figure 2.2- 26 Occurrence of three categories of macro-invertebrates......... 336
Figure 2.3. 1 Climate Map of the Philippines ................................................... 346
xv
Figure 2.3. 2 Normal monthly rainfall volume pattern in Cebu (1980-2010)
....................................................................................................... 347
Figure 2.3. 3 Normal Temperature Range in Cebu ......................................... 348
Figure 2.3. 4 Historical Extreme Wind Speed by Month ................................. 349
Figure 2.3. 5 Annual Wind Rose Diagram (1995 to 2015) ................................ 351
Figure 2.3. 6 Wind Speed Frequency Chart ..................................................... 351
Figure 2.3. 7 Typhoon Risk Status of the Philippine Islands .............................. 352
Figure 2.3. 8 Graph of Monitored TSP Concentration at Crusher Line 1,
2013 to 2017 .................................................................................. 371
Figure 2.3. 9 2021 Noise Levels Captured near Cabuan Elementary
School, Cogon, Naga, Cebu....................................................... 372
Figure 2.3. 10 2021 Noise Levels Captured near Volleyball Court at Sitio
Bantoon, Cogon, Naga, Cebu ................................................... 372
Figure 2.3. 11 2021 Noise Levels Captured at the JLRCAI Quarry Loading
Area, Cogon, Naga, Cebu .......................................................... 373
Figure 2.3. 12 Monitored Noise in Crushed Aggregates Surge Pile .................. 374
Figure 2.3. 13 Monitored Noise in Hopper Area ................................................ 374
Figure 2.3. 14 Noise Forecast Around the Quarry and Crusher Line 2 ............. 378
Figure 2.3. 15 Forecast Noise levels around Crusher Line 1 and Line 2 ........... 379
Figure 2.3. 16 Worst Case Noise Impact around Crusher Line 1 ..................... 380
Figure 2.4- 1 Project Impact Barangays ........................................................... 388
Figure 2.4- 3 Expanded Production Area, Crusher Line 2 and Crusher Line
1 Vicinities ...................................................................................... 388
Figure 2.4- 2 Quarry North Road to Cabuan Elementary School to Camp
8 Connecting to Naga-Toledo .................................................... 389
Figure 2.4- 3 Quarry North Road to Cabuan Elementary School to Camp
8 Connecting to Talisay-Toledo Road......................................... 389
Figure 2.4- 4 Residential Clusters along the Cogon- Guindaruhan-
Tungkop to Cebu South Road ............................................... 2.4-390
Figure 2.4- 6 Population and Population Growth Rate of Naga, 1903 to
2020................................................................................................ 394
Figure 2.4- 7 Population and Average Annual Growth Rate of Minglanilla
....................................................................................................... 395
Figure 2.4- 8 Proposed Land Use Map of Minglanilla ...................................... 407
Figure 2.4- 9 Distribution of City of Naga Labor Force by Gainful
Occupations, 2015 ....................................................................... 410
Figure 2.4- 10 Forest-based Livelihood in Project Impact Barangays .............. 413
Figure 2.4- 11 Distribution of Minglanilla Labor Force by Gainful
Occupations, 2015 ....................................................................... 414
Figure 2.4- 12 Number of Households in Occupied Housing Units by Type of
Toilet Facilities, 2015 ...................................................................... 415
Figure 2.4- 13 Infant and Young Child Mortality Rate, Naga City, 2011 to
2015................................................................................................ 422
Figure 2.4- 14 Poverty Incidence in Naga and Minglanilla, 2009, 2012 and
2015................................................................................................ 457
Figure 2.4- 15 Percent Distribution of Households by Food Security Status in
Cebu, Central Visayas and The Philippines, 2015 ...................... 459
Figure 2.4- 16 Frequency of Occurrence Based on The Household Food
Insecurity Access Scale Questions Across Cebu, 2015 .............. 459
Figure 2.4- 17 Highest Educational Attainment of Population Near &
Around the Barangay Halls of MPSA-Host Barangays ............... 461
xvi
Figure 2.4- 18 Employment of 10% of Households In MPSA Host Barangays ... 462
Figure 3.4- 1 Qslope Model – Recommended Bench Slope (%) at Bench
Height 5m ...................................................................................... 482
Figure 3.5- 1 History of Safety Drills Conducted ............................................... 507
Figure 4. 1 Concept of Bank Stabilization around Settling Ponds and
Lagoons ......................................................................................... 538
Figure 4. 2 Enterprises by Women’s Organization in the Visayas (GREAT
WOMEN Project, CIDA) ................................................................ 552
Figure 6. 1 Monitored TSS Concentrations, 2017 to 2021 ............................. 607
Figure 6. 2 Existing Project Silt Control Facilities ............................................ 608
Figure 6. 3 TSS levels Sampled from Project Impact Receiving Waters,
Feb. 17 & June 14, 2021............................................................... 608
Figure 6. 4 Air and Water Quality Monitoring Stations ................................. 612
Figure 6. 5 Monitored Monthly Average Noise Levels at Crusher Line 1
Hopper Area, 2019 to March 2021 .............................................. 614
Figure 6. 6 Monitored Monthly Average Noise Levels at Crusher Line 1
Crushed Sand Stockpile Area, 2019 to March 2021 .................. 614
Figure 6. 7 School Road Safety Monitoring Locations ................................. 629
Figure 6. 8 Grievance and Redress Management Mechanism.................. 638
Figure 8. 1 Proposed Project Organizational Structure ................................ 647
LIST OF ANNEXES
Annex
Description
Number
1 Sworn Statement of Proponent and Preparer
2 Mineral Production Sharing Agreement 194-2004-VII
3 ECC No. 0403-008-302
4 Public Scoping Report
5 Complaint Letter Filed in EMB 7 Regarding Lot 9047, Location Map & Tax
Declaration
6 Permit to Operate
7 Discharge Permit Status
8 Hazardous Waste Generator ID
9 Proof of transport and disposal of hazardous wastes
10 JLR Conversion Factor for Cubic Meter to Ton of Product
11 Draft Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) with the Naga City Government for
Road Maintenance and copy of Brgy. Resolutions Requesting JLRCAI for
alternative access roads
12 JLR Safety and Health Program
13 Soil Moisture Balance Approach in Estimating Aquifer Recharge Volume
14 USEPA Source Classification Codes for Blasting
15 Laboratory Certificates for Soil, Water and Air Quality Analyses
16 Raw Data of Flora and Fauna Survey
17 Support documents for Noise Attenuation Calculation
18 NWRB Certificate
19 Rational Method Run-Off Coefficient Tables
20 2021 Water Quality Sampling Site Photos
21 Monthly Windrose Diagrams
xvii
Annex
Description
Number
22 Certification from MGB Region VII Regarding Missed JLR Air Quality Sampling
Schedules
23 JLR Internal Noise Monitoring Data
24 Household Survey Questionnaire and Result of Household Survey
25 List of Land Claimants within Production Area
26 List of Land Claimants along proposed Haul Road
27 Support Information Regarding JLR SDMP Implementation
28 Proof of Submission of Self-monitoring reports 2018-2020
29 Proof of Submission of Compliance monitoring reports 2018-2020
30 Survey Returns from Population within Expanded Production Area
31 JLRCAI Emergency Preparedness and Response Plan
32 Draft JLRCAI Resettlement Framework Plan
33 Project Environmental Monitoring and Audit Prioritization Scheme (PEMAPS)
Questionnaire
34 Project Feasibility Study
35 Mineral Exploration Report
36 JLR summary of financial performance in SDMP and site photos
37 Summary Matrix Documentation of MMT Meetings
38 2004 Project EMP
39 MMT Monitoring Report format required under DAO 2015-02
40 Qslope Calculations
41 River Sections
42 Alignment of Proposed Alternate Haul Road connecting to Talisay-Toledo Road
43 Copy of Tax Declaration and Land Title for Crusher 1 Area
44 Depletion Table of Mineable Aggregates
45 Nursery Location Map and Tree Plantation Area
46 CENRO Certification re Land Classification of Production Area
xviii
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1
Contact Ms. Candice Regner-Neri
Person CEO and General Manager
/Designation Telephone: 09173204011
E-mail: candiceneri@yahoo.com
Engr. Manuelito G. Jumao-as
QAD Division Manager
Telephone: 09176256098
E-mail: jumao23@yahoo.com
EIA Preparer Teodora Haresco-Salvador IPCO 111. PRC License No.01513
Envitech Environmental Management Consultancy Service
No. 5 Joshua St. Filinvest Heights, Bagong Silangan, Quezon
City
Contact numbers 028-961-6600; mobile 0916-7089835
In association with Engr. Cesar S. Siador, jr., PRC No. CHE 11686
Environmental Professionals and Associates (EPA)
Process Documentation
EIA Team
The EIA process in Figure 1 followed the procedure outlined in DENR DAO 2017-15.
The EIA studies took seven (7) months and report preparation took two (2) months.
2
Environmental Impact Study Area
The environmental impact study area covered the City of Naga and the
Municipality of Minglanilla. The direct impact zone encompasses 339.2 hectares
comprising the 336-hectare MPSA area and 3.2 hectares of new alternative haul
road connecting Barangay Cogon, and Barangay Camp 8 to Talisay-Toledo Road,
resulting from community request for road services. Secondary impact areas
comprise of 20 hectares of Area Sensitive Receptors (ASR) residential areas around
Line 1 Crusher area, and 14 hectares along the existing primary haul road, the
Cogon- Guindaruhan- Tungkop Barangay Road to the Cebu South Road. The
environmental impact study area is shown in Figure 1.1.
2021 2022
No. ACTIVITY Feb. Mar. Apr. May Jun. JulyAug.Sept.Oct.Nov. Dec. Jan. Feb Mar. Jun Jul
1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4
1 Site Scoping
2 IEC
3 Public Scoping
4 Technical Scoping
5 Baseline Data Collection/ Verification
5 Flora and Fauna Survey
5 Soil Sampling
5 Limnology Survey
5 Household Survey
6 Water Sampling
6 Air Quality Sampling
6 Environmental Impact Assessment and Management Planning
8 Procedural Screening
4
Potential Impact Methodology/Sampling and
Study Area
Receptor Domain Measurement Plan
• Greenhouse Gas Inventory using
IPCC reference data
• Digital noise attenuation
modelling
• Project air quality monitoring data
• Assessment using DAO 2000-81
standard
Secondary sources:
• Naga City Comprehensive Land
Use Plan (2017 to 2026) Direct Impact Area –
• Comprehensive Land Use Plan of 150 hectares
the Municipal Government of Expanded
Minglanilla 1999-2009 Production Area;
Public • Philippine Statistics Authority 2015 Secondary Impact
Perception Census of Populations and Areas: the rest of
Survey Households and 2020 Population Barangay Cogon,
Socio- Census Barangay Lanas, in
economic • Barangay Development Profile the City of Naga,
Profile information from the Barangays of Barangay
Cogon, Lanas, Guindaruhan and Guindaruhan and
Camp 8. Camp 8 in the
• Focus Group Discussions Municipality of
• Key Informant Interview Minglanilla.
• Household Surveys with assistance
from local Barangay Health
Workers
Both primary and secondary data were utilized in the assessment of project
impacts. Primary data were obtained through on-site investigation and field
sampling and surveys, while secondary data were collected from JLRCAI Inc. and
from related government agencies/institutions. The summary of the methodologies
employed during the EIA process is enumerated in Table 2.
Public Participation
Public participation was obtained by way of Key Informant Interviews, Focus Group
Discussions (FGDs), a survey of (informal) households within the project site, a survey
of households along the proposed alternative haul road from Sitio Cabuan,
connecting to Camp 8 and to the Naga Toledo Road, survey of a portion of the
population of Barangays Cogon, Lanas, Guindaruhan and Camp 8, conduct of
Public Scoping and the required Public Hearing. The documentation of IEC
activities and Public Scoping are annexed to project reports earlier submitted to
EMB as part of the preparation for the EIA activities. The summary of questions,
issues, and concerns raised during the IEC activities and Public Scoping are in
Annex 4.
5
Summary of Key Issues and Concerns Raised During Public Scoping
Table 3 Summary of Key Issues and Concerns
EIA Module Issues/Suggestions Suggestion Sector How Issue is addressed by
Raised by Stakeholder or Representative the Project /Mitigating
Who Raised the Measures
Issue
1. Land How many tax Naga City 3 lots have Free Patent.
declarations are ENRO, Arthur 4 lots have Free Patent
covered Villamor applications in CENRO.
For all land rights that
will be acquired,
JLRCAI will continue
paying real estate
taxes as at present.
2. Water Impact on creeks Ivan Lee Project will have and
Montejo, maintain silting ponds
MENRO, and lagoons with more
Minglanilla than sufficient
capacity to hold peak
storm drain and allow
underground infiltration
for aquifer recharge.
20-vegetative buffer
zone on all creek banks
in project site will be
preserved. There will be
no modification of
waterways.
3. Air Road dust Ivan Lee The project will only
Montejo, add 20% to its current
MENRO, production from
Minglanilla Crusher 1. If expansion
is approved, products
will haul out through
the Cogon-Cabuan-
Camp8-Naga Toledo
Highway. Project will
raise concern for
participation of all
industrial users in road
maintenance.
Air Quality Eduardo An Air Quality
Monitoring Station Sismar, 1ST Monitoring Station in
in Cabuan School Kagawad has been set-up
Cabuan School,
baseline air quality was
sampled there on
February 9, 2021.
6
EIA Module Issues/Suggestions Suggestion Sector How Issue is addressed by
Raised by Stakeholder or Representative the Project /Mitigating
Who Raised the Measures
Issue
7
EIA Module Issues/Suggestions Suggestion Sector How Issue is addressed by
Raised by Stakeholder or Representative the Project /Mitigating
Who Raised the Measures
Issue
secure the Road Right
of Way.
Impact of the Naga City Project has established
quarry operations ENRO, Arthur a windsock in the area
to the residents of Villamor facing Cabuan. Work
Cabuan in that area will be
suspended when the
wind direction is toward
Cabuan
Alternatives Considered
JLRCAI Inc. considered several options in the process of defining this proposed
Project. The alternatives considered pertaining to project technology and process,
site selection, and resource utilization is summarized in Table 4.
Technology
Considerations
(1)blast and push Significant surface water Not allowed by the
over slope method of siltation, uncontrolled Bureau of Mines
mineral extraction slope stability, significant
source of increase in
ambient particulates
affecting workers, coating
vegetation with dust and
affecting photosynthesis
Surface bench cut Controlled slope This was the approved
extraction using modification resulting in mineral extraction
controlled blasting, better control of stability method since 2004
immediate haul out Less material spill, less
sediment contribution to
surface run-off. Lesser dust
emissions
(2) Wet method of Potential water resource Not preferred to avoid
aggregate use competition, the area complaints from the
processing for Crusher has limited ground water local community. Dry
Line 1 resources method of aggregate
processing is preferred.
Dry method for Dust emissions are within The 17-hectare Crushing
aggregate the Crusher and Quarry site is within quarry area
processing in Crusher area and uninhabited. Easy
Line 2
8
Alternative Main Environmental Impact/s Evaluation/Decision
dust suppression
through water sprinkling.
Rain harvesting Small amount deducted This is preferred over
through lagoons from potential aquifer increasing the power to
within quarry site to recharge. Avoids ground extract Line 1 process
provide back-up water competition water from Cogon River
water supply in dry
season for Crusher 1
Use of overhead Reduction of contribution This is preferred material
material conveyor to ground level traffic transport for operating
from Quarry to volume and road surface efficiency.
Crusher 1 deterioration
Resources and The on-going quarry The area is permitted for
location operations and mineral large scale mineral
exploration report confirm extraction and is the
the presence of minerals preferred project
acceptable for use in the location due to existing
construction industry. mine-operating permit.
“No Project” Scenario No changes to existing Not an attractive
water quality at Cogon option.
River, Project will not have
resources to develop
Taking no action on an
massive inland silting
apparent local demand
ponds and lagoons. No
which is within the local
new employment
capacity to supply, for
opportunities and sources
no justifiable reason, is
for national and local tax
not an intelligent,
revenues. No further
rational, or logical
increase in assistance
course of action for a
funds for social
developing country.
development support.
Continued importation of
sand and aggregates
from unknown quarries in
Leyte and associated
greenhouse gas emissions
from transport, to meet
the requirements of Cebu
construction industry,
losing the employment
and taxation opportunity
from this project.
9
Pandan Formation (Santos Yñigo, 1951; Hashimoto and Balce, 1977 in BMG 1981).
Published geological maps (sheet no 3750-IV BMG, 1981) show a pyroclastic rock
formation with intercalated clastic sedimentary rocks occupying a large part of
block 2 which corresponds to the Pandan Formation of earlier workers. The Cansi
Volcanics which is made-up mainly of basaltic to andesitic lava flows occupies
large portions of MPSA blocks 1, 3 and 4. Exposures show a moderate to high
degree of fracturing and weathering. The rocks appear to have several facies
exhibiting fine-gained through finely porphyritic to coarsely porphyritic textures.
Amygdaloidal features were also noted. Specimen samples subjected to micro-
chemical and physical test shows no reaction to cold HCI but exhibits slight
magnetic property. The Pandan Formation occupies large areas in all the blocks.
Traverses reveal that the Pandan Formation consists of a sequence of andesitic to
basaltic pyroclastics and lava flow, sandstone, conglomeratic sandstone,
calcareous mudstone, siltstone and limestone. The andesitc and basaltic
pyroclastic and lava flows are moderately to highly fractured but generally hard.
Topography
Approximately 80% of the area is characterized by a rugged terrain. The river and
creek banks have steep to nearly vertical inclinations. Highest point within the
blocks is Mt. Lanas (locally called Mt. Naupa) with its apex at elevation 543 meters
above sea level. The rest of the area (about 20%) has moderate terrain with
elevations ranging from 40 meters to 180 meters above sea level.
Pedology
Soil within the area and its immediate vicinities has been classified as part of
Baguio Clay Loam based on the soil classification made by the Bureau of Soils and
Water Management. The Baguio Clay Loam is widespread and has developed
over the Pangdan Formation. Soil that formed is generally brown to black. The
texture is generally fine to coarse grained and moderately plastic. Its thickness
usually varies but typically ranges from few centimeters to about 20 centimeters.
The lower layer or the horizon is of lighter color and comparatively contains less
organic matter. The texture is slightly coarse to fine grained and slightly plastic. The
thickness hovers from 20 - 40 centimeters.
Terrestrial Biology
Flora
The proposed site is highly denuded due to the prevalence of kaingin farming
(slash-and-burn). In general, the vegetation cover is predominantly
characterized by grasses, weeds, bushes and agricultural crops with occasional
trees distributed in the area.
Fauna
10
IThe avian species identified in the area in 2004 were associated with agricultural
lands, shrubland, and grasslands. There are 14 species of birds identified in the
area. Most of the avian species are insectivorous and frugivorous due to the
presence of corn crops and other fruit sources (i.e., mango and bananas), and
insects in the areas. Two species abundant were Chestnut Munia (Lonchura
malacca) and European Tree Sparrow (Passer montanus). These are
graminivorous and considered major agricultural pests.
A dendritic drainage pattern has developed over the MPSA area. One of the
tributaries, the Naupa Creek, is structurally and lithologically-controlled. This creek
has formed along the trace of the fault which is also the contact between two
rock formations, the Malubog Formation and the Mananga Formation. The major
creeks and river traversing the proposed quarry expansion area are the Naupa
Creek and the Cabuan Creek. The NE-SW trending Matun-og Creek with
headwaters in Guindaruhan upstream of Camp 8 join Cogon River to drain toward
Cebu/ Bohol Strait. About half of the westernmost block is drained by tributaries of
the Pandan River which also empties its load in the Bohol Straight.
Water Quality
The upper sections of Cabuan Creek and Naupa Creek manifest pristine
condition. The middle and lower segments of these river are heavily silted. Many
small-scale stone quarry activities observed along the Naupa Creek, Cogon River
and Matun-og Creek are major contributors to river siltation.
Climatology
Cebu falls within a Climate Type III (Modified Coronas Climate Classification)
characterized as having no pronounced seasons, relatively dry from March to
August and wet during the rest of the year. On the average, the area is visited by
one typhoon annually.
Air Quality
Results of air quality sampling and analysis are not yet available. Due to the rainy
weather as of reconnaissance activities, the observed air quality within the quarry
and within the crushing plant bore no visible or perceptible levels of ambient dust.
Available population data show the total population of Naga City to be 115,750 as
of 2015. Of this, the population of Barangay Cogon was 4,267 persons, or 4%. The
City of Naga had an average annual population growth rate of 2.6% from 2960 to
2015, higher than the Cebu provincial rate of 2.2% for the same period.
Naga City has gender ratio of 1.04, a young dependency rate of 44.5%, a labor
force of 62% and old dependency rate of 10.8%.
11
Naga has high percentage of elementary and high school-level individuals who
are attending school (96%). Naga has 98% literacy rate among persons ten years
and older.
There ten (10) informal settler-families within the proposed JLR production area. Of
the ten (10) informal settler families, seven (7) indicated willingness to be relocated,
one (1) declined due to possible loss of livelihood, one (1) stated that relocation will
“depend on the situation” and one gave no reply regarding the matter.
The JLRCAI will offer compensation to the informal settlers that will help them
improve their lives, that is, (i) compensation for the affected structures which they
may use as livelihood capital since they will be allowed to dismantle and relocate
their homes and farm sheds (ii) giving of disturbance fee and (iii) giving priority in
project employment at construction and site preparation activities and in project
operation; in SDMP livelihood skills training and be given priority in the purchase of
food materials by Company canteen operations.
Target Performance /
Activity Impacts Mitigating Measure
Efficiency
12
Target Performance /
Activity Impacts Mitigating Measure
Efficiency
clinic waste, broken hauled out in
equipment with compliance with
electronic DAO 29-92
components)
Provide safe and
sealed containers
for each waste type
Place placards with
the symbol
representing the
hazard
classification of the
waste per (DAO
2004-36)
Store hazardous
waste in safe, dry,
and well-ventilated
shed if not hauled
out immediately.
Haul out of
hazardous waste by
accredited TSD
agent.
Surface water Installation of Total Suspended
quality sufficient settling Solids (TSS) at
deterioration ponds cum storm outfall of Project
drain retention silt traps and
basins before settling ponds in
expanded quarry Cabuan Creek
operations to cease and Cogon River
discharge of quarry will not add to
run-off to Cogon background TSS
River volume from
Upper Cabuan
River.
Diminution of Protection and Thriving
riparian buffer enhancement conditions 100%
zone planting in bare of vegetation
20meters both sides within 20meters
of creeks within the left and right of
production area creeks within the
Ensuring no soil production area
overlay on the Creeks within the
riparian buffer zone production area
shall remain
untouched,
unimpeded
natural flow will
be ensured.
13
Target Performance /
Activity Impacts Mitigating Measure
Efficiency
15
Target Performance /
Activity Impacts Mitigating Measure
Efficiency
16
Target Performance /
Activity Impacts Mitigating Measure
Efficiency
Haul out of
hazardous waste by
accredited
hazardous waste
transporter and
treater
Apply controlled Zero (0) cracks on
Vibration blasting and use of structures.
millisecond delays
Noise reduction Zero (0)
through non- complaints on
Blasting (Loud) simultaneous hole noise from
sound blasting blasting
(millisecond delays
in-between blasts)
Blasting in source Zero (0)
area directly open complaints on
Drilling and
toward residential dusts from
Blasting
area will be blasting
suspended/ re-
scheduled
appropriately / until
Increased dust wind direction is
toward opposite
direction.
Wet the surface of
blasting area
before drilling and
placement of
explosives
Periodic high Designate vehicle Zero health issues
ambient dust and personnel among quarry
concentrations pathways in and plant workers
at quarry and Crusher 2 and due to regular
Crusher Line 1 admin building and long term
premises, and mat exposure to
pathway and particulates and
driveway with fines
gravel. Plant grass
or creepers in all
unused open areas.
Install overhead
sprinkler at hopper,
to wet materials
being transported
through overhead
conveyor at rate of
5 liters per cubic
meter
17
Target Performance /
Activity Impacts Mitigating Measure
Efficiency
Continue water
sprinkling at Crusher
1 hopper feeding
the overhead
conveyor
Required all quarry
and crusher workers
to use N94 dust
mask and safety
glasses at work
Exceeding, Limit Crusher 1 Noise level from
disturbing operation between Project activities
noise 6:00am to 6:00pm. perceived in
Promote and residential areas
distribute planting in Sitio Bantoon,
materials for thick- Cogon, Naga will
leaved plants and be within the
hanging following noise
ornamentals to limit for residential
residents in areas 90% of time:
Barangay Bantoon
to aid noise
buffering
Period
dB(A)
Require quarry all
crusher workers to
Morning 50
use earmuffs while
working. Practice & Daytime 55
use visual signaling Evening 50
& signage Nighttime 45
communication
methods
Carbon offsetting Redemption of
through 100% of carbon
Unmitigated implementation of emissions and
greenhouse the vegetation/ development of
gas emissions reforestation plan carbon sink from
for idle portions of reforestation
the MPSA
Construct an Zero (0) accidents
alternative all- involving project-
weather industrial associated
road connecting vehicles
Road safety the quarry, Sitio
risks Cabuan, Camp 8
to the Talisay-
Toledo Road
18
Target Performance /
Activity Impacts Mitigating Measure
Efficiency
Continue
advocating with
Naga LGU the
regular repair of
barangay road
Cogon-
Guindaruhan-
Tungkop by all
industrial users
Distribute material
delivery across
various available
haul roads to
minimize traffic
congestion along
selected Barangay
roads
Require haulers to
maintain 15kph
speed 500m before
and after the
school premises
and 30kph along
Barangay roads, to
be stipulated in
service Contract.
Avoid scheduling
material transport
through the Cogon-
Guindaruhan-
Tungkop Barangay
Road between 6:30
am to 8:00 am,
11:00 am to 1:00
pm, 3:30 to 4:30 pm
during school days
Project facilities, to Zero (0) fatal
include provision for injuries to workers
DOLE & MGB
requirements for
Maintained less
Health and occupational
than 5% loss of
safety hazards health and safety
person-hours due
to workers to accidents
Conduct of
workers’ safety/
toolbox meetings
every Monday
19
Target Performance /
Activity Impacts Mitigating Measure
Efficiency
Zero (0) violation
Implementation of of DAO 29-92 and
safety protocols for RA 9003
drilling, blasting,
and crushing
operations in all
applicable
activities, checked,
and confirmed by
the Safety
Managers
Implementation of
4 safety drills per
year
Daily checking of
correct stockpiling
of topsoil and
overburden/quarry
waste materials;
proper storage of
crusher hazardous
waste materials
Generation of Organization, At least two (2)
benefits to the training, and viable people’s
Community capacitation of the cooperatives,
local Labor Service established to
Providers and support Project
Producers’ requirements for
Cooperative to employee
provide services cafeteria,
and supplies for cleaning
JLRCAI and materials, etc.,
develop local becoming viable
enterprises to be on 7th year of
sustainable beyond operation
Project life.
Promotion of
school-based
development of
nurseries for high
quality planting
materials for food,
herbal medicine,
forest trees and to
supply Project
planting
requirements while
20
Target Performance /
Activity Impacts Mitigating Measure
Efficiency
students earn
resources for school
projects
Uncontrolled Prioritize local labor Zero (0) new
in-migration as much as informal
and possible. settlements within
proliferation of Post work 1 km radius of
informal opportunities project site.
settlers prominently at the
Barangay Halls, Zero (0) number of
chapels, and Public non-resident labor
Schools of Cogon, workers
Guindaruhan,
Lanas and Camp8.
Require Barangay
Certificate of 3-year
residency, for new
job applicants
Only hire from
outside of Naga
and Minglanilla
when the required
skills are not locally
available.
Employment Comply with DOLE 100% compliant
generation regulations with Philippine
regarding Labor Code
contractual wages
and benefits.
Abandonment
Equipment Waste Shredding of 100% of waste
dismantling and generation biodegradable materials are
demobilization waste and placing hauled out from
in compost pit Project site within
All recoverable one year of
materials will be closure
disposed through notification.
accredited
material recyclers Zero (0) road
All residual wastes accidents occur
will be hauled out during
to municipal land abandonment
fill. phase.
Proper
containment and
storage of all
hazardous waste
materials, and
disposal through
21
Target Performance /
Activity Impacts Mitigating Measure
Efficiency
authorized TSD
agent.
Potential The quarry will be Zero (0) accidents
public and closed to the public occur during
workers’ safety during abandonment
risks rehabilitation and phase
decommissioning
to avoid public
100% of final air
safety risks
and water quality
All workers are sampling results,
trained for the job and report on
and provided with final inspection for
PPE project exit from
All structures and environmental
facilities that are indicate that the
public safety risks Project site is free
will be dismantled from the
and removed. existence of, and
All haul trucks will as source of
be required to environmental
comply with LTO risks.
road safety
requirement for
oversized cargo
and visibility
markings
All settling ponds,
drainage systems
and oil and water
separators will be
cleaned-out.
All sources of
environmental
deterioration, if
found, will be
remediated by
JLRCAI.
A final air and water
quality sampling will
be undertaken,
witnessed by the
MMT and EMB 7 or
equivalent entities,
to verify that
environmental
quality at
abandonment
complies with
environmental
regulation.
22
Target Performance /
Activity Impacts Mitigating Measure
Efficiency
The risks and uncertainties related to the findings and implications for decision-
making are presented in the following table:
23
Module Risks and Uncertainties Implications for Decision Making
plotting of Project geographic
coordinates furnished by JLRCAI. As
an EIA is a planning tool,
recommendations set forth in this
report are made from a “worst
case” assumption and the
Proponent has been advised to
implement on-site mitigation by
observing site features. Uncertainty
particularly pertaining to Project
compliance in quarry extraction
within the limits of Project MPSA may
be settled with a Certification from
MGB VII.
The aquifer intake points
around the Project area are
crevasses and fissures in Control of surface water pollution
underlying rocks. Continued along Cabuan Creek and Cogon
high concentration of Total River will require endorsement to
Suspended Solids in Cabuan LGU for implementation among
Water Creek and Cogon River small scale quarries in the area in
brought about by a number of view of the environmental
uncontrolled small scale management function devolved
quarries around the Project under the Local Government Code
area will contribute to the of 1991.
healing, closure of cracks, and
reduce aquifer recharge
potential.
The actual on-site perception of
noise generated by the Project will
tend to be lower vegetation and
The logarithmic model for noise
undulating landform impedes noise
attenuation did not consider
Air dissemination. The forecast given in
the terrain and vegetation, it
this study is therefore safe for the
assumed straight and direct
Proponent to comply control
attenuation.
measures and may result in less noise
disturbance in area sensitive
receptors.
Barangay boundary
discrepancies were noted
between the NAMRIA Topo Map,
Should there be complaints pertaining
LGU Maps, and FMB Maps. To
to project benefits or compensation,
People harmonize the EIA presentation
on-ground Barangay boundaries need
maps, “best fit” approach was
to be settled among LGUs concerned.
used in geophysical information
system mapping, referenced on
roads, rivers, and the coastline.
24
1 Project Description
1.1 Introduction
The Project is an expansion of existing operations under ECC No. 0403-008-302,
involving extraction of non-metallic minerals through surface bench cut, and
processing to produce aggregates for construction applications. The existing wet
process crushing which is approximately one (1) kilometer south of the quarry will
continue, to handle a maximum 10% of expanded quarry production. Material
transport between the quarry and Crusher 1 will be transported through overhead
conveying system. This expansion application includes a 2nd Crusher line to use dry
process and will be located within the quarry pit for control of dust and noise
dispersion and reduce potential public road traffic congestion.
JLRCAI was issued Environmental Compliance Certificate (ECC) Ref. No. 0403-008-
302 on August 27, 2004 for the increase in extraction of basalt materials from 45,000
to 500,000 cubic meters from MPSA No. 194-2004-VII with approved area of 336
hectares, which then recently superseded its initial mining area of 20 hectares. The
original target commodity were basaltic aggregates. To maximize benefit from
finite natural quarries, incidental minerals such as lapilli tuff, and weathered
overburden will be included in the JLR products offered to the market as these
pass construction material quality requirements. The ECC project title is proposed
to be maintained, to avoid confusion and processes involved with changing the
project name in pertinent documents in the Mines and Geosciences Bureau.
The Project is currently operating under the initial authorization of ECC No. 0403-
008302 while preparing documentary requirements to secure approval for
increased production.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION 25
Figure 1. 1 Project Location and Environmental Impact Study Area Map
26
Figure 1. 2 Map Showing Existing and Proposed Quarry Expansion, In-Pit Crusher and Conveyor Line
27
Table 1. 1 Coordinates of Project Location
A. MPSA 194-2004-VII
The existing Crusher Line 1 which is also submitted for increase in aggregate
processing and production is within an area classified as Alienable and Disposable.
Land Title is included in Annex 44.
28
1.3 Project Accessibility
The City of Naga is 22 km Southwest of Cebu City and lies along the Cebu South
National Road which is accessible by all types of land transport vehicles. it is
approximately 35 kilometers away from the Mactan Cebu International Airport in
Lapu-Lapu City, Cebu and 25 kilometers away from the Cebu International Port.
Cebu island can be reached by a 1.15-hour flight from Manila or a 20-hour
maritime travel.
The expanded Basalt quarry production area is located in Barangay Cogon, City
of Naga, Province of Cebu. The existing primary haul road to market destinations
is through the 6.0-kilometer Cogon- Guindaruhan-Tungkop barangay road (See
Figure 1. 3). Another haul road used is the Cantao-an Pangdan barangay road.
Ninety percent of this road is cemented, and the rest is made of dirt and gravel.
The Cogon-Cantao-an-Inayagan Naga road which is a two-lane concrete road
made especially for the Naga Township Export Processing Zone is another
available haul road. The area can also be reached via the Naga-Toledo Road
through Brgy. Lutac and Brgy. Lanas of Naga town.
Under this application, an all-weather road from the Quarry, passing not more than
100 meters from the Cabuan School connecting to Camp 8 and northward to the
Talisay-Toledo Road is proposed, in response to community request and to reduce
congestion at the existing haul road which is also used by four (4) other major
quarry projects in Naga City, Cebu. The alignment plan of the proposed
alternative haul road is in Annex 42.
1.4 Rationale
Cebu is seen as one of the most favorable places for the location of new industrial
and commercial activities outside Metro Manila that will be opened by the
integration of the country to global trade and investment which is made possible
by the liberalization of the country’s trade and investment policies. With its
strategic location, it is expected that its current growth will continue to rise and
there would be many development and construction activities particularly in
Metro Cebu.
There are a number of small-scale river aggregate quarries in the province that
supply the growing demand for aggregates in Cebu’s construction industry, but
these are insufficient.
In response to this situation, the JLR Construction and Aggregates Inc. aims to
increase production capacity for aggregate materials, hereby applying for the
amendment ECC No. 0403-008-302. The expansion project promotes countryside
development by boosting local employment, generated trickle-down livelihood
opportunities to the local communities, supply the requirements of the local
construction industry with local materials, generate revenues for the local and
national government while managing negative environmental impacts
commonly neglected in small scale quarries. The updated project Feasibility Study
in Annex 35 provides details on Project viability.
29
1.5 Project Alternatives
To meet the exponential growth of demand for aggregates in Cebu, JLRCAI is
submitting application to increase annual aggregate production. The criteria for
the selection of Project technology, resources to be used, and project siting are as
follows:
The use of dry method crushing for the new Line 2 responds to the limitation in
ground water availability in the area and will avoiding water resource use
competition with the local community.
The use of overhead material conveyor system from quarry to Crushing Plant Line
1, one kilometer away is an efficient transport method that reduces traffic
congestion along the public haul road, reduces road surface deterioration and
Project greenhouse gas contribution.
The siting of the in-pit crusher within the quarry provides physical barrier offered by
the surrounding mountains to contain increased ambient dust and noise within the
uninhabited quarry area. This alternative is chosen over siting Line 2 crusher
annexed to Line 1 in a densely populated area.
30
1.5.4 “No Project” Option
A “No Project” Option is expected to cause an increase in small scale sand and
gravel quarry operations which generally have lesser to no environmental impact
control measures and are less monitored in terms of income tax payments to
Government. The JLRCAI has been granted MPSA with remaining mine life and a
“no project option will deprive the Project host local government units and the
national government of revenues from income taxes, VAT, mineral excise taxes
and some PhP 83,278,539 social development assistance generated from project
operations. The project investment of PhP 911,245,000 will not be infused in the
Philippine economy. Some 109 families in Barangays Cogon, Lanas, Guindarohan
and Camp 8 will lose the benefit from regular, long term employment income.
Local businesses will lose a market, and thus will generate lower taxes for the
Government, from sales of equipment parts, equipment repair services, and
industrial supplies.
31
As of 2021
Figure 1. 3 Roads Connecting the JLR Project Site with National Highways
32
125 masl
SP
33
1.6 Project Components
The Project has three (3) components, namely:
1 Quarry
2 Crushers 1 and 2
3 Single-line (one-way) overhead conveyor.
1.6.1 Quarry
The Mineral Exploration Report (see Annex 35) estimates mineable reserve of
66,000,000 m3 in the target production area. The present authorized annual
production of 500,000 m3 i s proposed to be increased to 2,000,000 m3 . From the
start of commercial operation in 2004, about 5,082,265 m3 have been extracted
from the MPSA as of end of 2021 (see Annex 44), with a balance of about
50,717,734.58 m3 mineable aggregates with remaining mine life of almost 25.36
years at 2 million m3 annual production from 2029 to 2054. MPSA 194-2004-VII issued
on May 22, 2004 is valid until May 21, 2029. JLRCAI shall apply for MPSA renewal.
The approval of this proposed increase in mineral extraction volume shall have
depleted the identified minable reserves by 34% by May 21, 2029. Annex 44 is a
table of depletion of mineral reserves in the MPSA by quarry extraction.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION 34
Table 1. 3 Existing and Amended Annual Production, Mineral Reserves and ECC area
ECC No. 0403-008-302
Tenement No. MPSA No. 194-2004-VII
Commodity Basalt/ Lapilli Tuff
Location Barangay Cogon, City of Naga, Cebu
Annual Quarry Production Existing: 500,000 cubic meters
For Amendment = 2,000,000 m3 or 4,000,000 mt
Existing: For amendment
Production Area (ha) 20 130
TOTAL AMENDED PRODUCTION 154.26
AREA
Conveyor (all within MPSA) 2
Alternative haul road (outside 3.2
MPSA (ha)
ECC Area (ha) 336 339.26
MPSA Area 336 No amendment
Please refer to (Annex 10) for the conversion method used in the production unit of measure in Table 1.3
The 336-hectare MPSA 194-2004-VII which was fully covered in the ECC issued in
2004, will be fully utilized as follows. Figure 1. 1 Environmental Impact Study Area
(EISA) map indicates the location of components outside of the Production Area :
PROJECT DESCRIPTION 35
Figure 1. 5 Project Buffer Zones
36
Photo 1. 1 Drilling Operations Photo 1. 3 Loading Operations
37
1.6.1.3 Extraction Method or Quarry Operations
The JLR aggregate production project extracts basaltic materials from its MPSA. The
mineral extraction method will utilize the same surface bench extraction by hillside cut
approach, employed in its existing 20-hectare quarry area. Figure 1. 4 presents the
Mine Development Plan up to the end of the present MPSA life. Table 1. 5 shows the
mine/ pit design parameters while Figure 1. 6 shows the typical bench profile. Photo
1. 5 is a view of the existing quarry taken from northeast direction.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION 38
1.6.2 Material Processing
The current aggregate production activities use the wet method, and involves
primary, secondary, and tertiary crushing. Under the present proposal, Crusher Line 1
will primarily handle secondary and tertiary crushing, while primary crushing will be
done in Line 2 (in-pit crusher). Currently, Crusher 1 has maximum permitted volume of
500,000 cubic meters of various sand and aggregate materials annually and operates
in a 3.5-hectare facility approximately one (1) kilometer southeast of the quarry,
connected through a barangay road. With this application for production increase,
Line 1 will process a total of 600,000 cubic meters sand and aggregates that require
washing. Line 1 operations when Line 2 shall be operational, will be secondary and
tertiary crushing while Line 2 will handle primary crushing. Only Line 1 will have washing
operations. Wash water will be drawn from Cogon River, for 46% of requirement while
56% are recycled. Figure 1. 7 shows the lay-out of Crusher Line 1 in the Environmental
Impact Statement approved with the issuance of ECC No. 0403-008-302, showing a
sump an intake pipe to source process water from said river.
In Figure 1. 10, pumped water from Cogon River is piped and sprayed over materials
on vibrating screens and rewashing bins to remove adhering sand and soil. Used
water is collected in receiving basins, and freely flow to silt ponds A and B concrete
and receives desilted overflow water from silt pond B, which has capacity of 3,168 m3.
In Plate 1. 2 we can see Silt Pond C with capacity of 7,420 m3. Centrifugal pumps in
“Silt Pond A” facilitate the reflow of desilted water for re-use in the washing system.
Settling ponds are regularly desilted daily to maintain the desilting efficiency.
Removed sediments are dried and added to the “fill materials” sold. On the average,
sand and aggregate washing water requirement is 0.88 m3 per cubic meter sand or
aggregate. Data from 2020 production indicate that a total water volume of 434,186
m3 was used to process 368,902 m3. For this, a total of 200,310 m3 (46%) was extracted
from river and 233,876m3 (54%) was recycled.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION 39
concrete
40
Figure 1. 8 Crushing Line 1 Plant Lay-out in 2004
41
1.6.2.2 Crusher Line 2
The In-Pit Crushing Plant otherwise referred-to in this report as the Crusher Line 2 will
adopt the Dry Method to produce sand and gravel aggregates, with maximum
production capacity of 1,200,000 cubic meters. The aggregate production
process will likewise use a three-stage crushing system consisting of a Jaw Crusher
and a two-stage Cone Crusher, a three-stage screening system and a finished
material storage system. The main equipment includes 1-Vibrating Grizzly Feeder,
1-Jaw Crusher, 2-Scalping Screens, 2-HP300 Standard Coarse Cone Crusher,
2HP300 Standard Fine Cone Crusher, and 3-Product Vibrating Screens.
The Vibrating Grizzly Feeder will consist of a pan section at the feed end to receive
and start segregating the material. The discharge end consists of a grizzly section
with openings that allow the undersized material to pass before discharging into
the crusher. The feeder is mounted on springs and vibrated via a mechanism
located underneath the feeder pan, protecting it from misfed material that fails to
reach the feed hopper. The vibration force is angled to the feeder, pointing
toward the discharge end. This action of the vibrator forces the material toward
the discharge end while segregating the material, causing the finer particles to
move toward the bottom of the load.
As the material travels to the grizzly section, the finer material settles to the bottom
and passes through the openings in the grizzly. This bypassed material decreases
the amount of material going into the crusher, reducing the size of the crusher
required as well as the wear inside the crusher. The bypassed material can be
combined with the material going through the crusher on the under conveyor. This
prescreened material protects the under conveyor from the impact of the
material exiting the crusher. The prescreened material is segregated as a product.
The Cone Crusher will be used as secondary crusher and crushes the material by
extrusion. It has characteristics such as large crushing ratio, high efficiency, and
uniform product granularity. Generally, the cone crusher is used in crushing a
variety of high hardness stone. A jaw crusher acts as a primary crusher, and the
cone crusher performs secondary crushing of the crushed material.
42
1.7 Project Size
Table 1. 6 Size of Production under Expanded Quarry Operations
EXISTING ECC AMENDED ECC
A. QUARRY AREA (has.) 20 150
(Cubic (Cubic
B. QUARRY PRODUCTION In Metric Tons
Meters) Meters)
Pyroclastic Rocks (Basalt) 460,000 1,800,000 3,600.000
Pozzolanic (Tuffaceous)
40,000 100,000 200,000
Materials
Fill Materials 100,000 200,000
B. CRUSHER
B.1 IN-PIT CRUSHER (L 2) DRY PROCESS In Metric Tons
Natural Sand 300,000 600,000
Coarse Sand 200,000 400,000
3/8" 150,000 300,000
3/4" 350,000 700,000
G-l 200,000 400,000
Sub-Total 1,200,000 2,400,000
B.2 EXISTING CRUSHER (L 1) WET PROCESS WET PROCESS In Metric Tons
Currently, the project delivers quarry production to crusher line 1 through dump
trucks via an all-weather road constructed by JLRCAI. The overhead conveyor
shall be the primary means of material transport for materials scheduled for
43
processing in Crusher Line 1. However, truck transport will be used when the
Conveying system is under repair or maintenance.
The alignment plan of the proposed alternative haul road from Barangay Cogon
through Camp 8 connecting to the Talisay-Toledo Road is in Annex 42.
44
Explosives
Magazine
45
Plate 1. 1 Existing Settling Pond Capacity in Crusher Line 1
46
1.8.5 Contour Canals
The quarry benches will be drained by contour canals with dimension of ± 0.5m x 0.5m
(Figure 1. 6) along bench toes, all interconnecting and leading to the silt ponds. The
purpose of silt ponds it to drain surface run-off away from access roads and minimize
road and vehicle operating costs associated with rutted roads.
The Project will cease to utilize these silt ponds and traps along the Cogon River as the
treatment of silted quarry surface water will all be done inland, in the effort to restore
attendant riparian ecosystem previously damaged by uncontrolled sediment loading
mostly from upstream small-scale quarry operations.
Based on geologic and hydrogeologic maps from the Mines and Geosciences
Bureau, indications strongly suggest that Cogon River is an aquifer intake point which
allows river seepage to infiltrate underground, to finally enter rock fissures and
interstices in underground water-holding rocks that supply the wells in lower
elevations. An estimated 13 silting ponds with total holding capacity of 665,000 m3 are
part of the mine lay-out plan (Figure 1.4). The lagoons are envisioned designed to
retain peak run-off volume and allow underground infiltration. A total of 13 settling
ponds with surface area of 66,500m2 and average depth of 10 meters and total
holding capacity of will be established in the expanded production area (see Plate
1. 3)
47
Table 1. 8 Capacity of Silting Ponds for Expanded Quarry Production
SP Design Design Theoretical Initial
Service
NO. Depth, Footprint, Design Latitude (N) Longitude ( E )
Area, ha Volume, m3
m m2 Dimension
1 20 70,000 10 7,000 100 x 70 10° 16' 51.600" 123° 44' 49.920"
2 10 100,000 10 10,000 100 x 100 10° 16' 44.400" 123° 44' 27.960"
3 10 50,000 10 5,000 100 x 50 10° 16' 37.200" 123° 44' 22.200"
4 30 70,000 10 7,000 100 x 70 10° 16' 35.400" 123° 44' 35.880"
5 20 50,000 10 5,000 100 x 50 10° 16' 32.880" 123° 44' 43.080"
6 10 25,000 10 2,500 50 x 50 10° 16' 39.360" 123° 45' 7.920"
7 5 75,000 10 7,500 100 x 75 10° 16' 49.800" 123° 44' 25.800"
8 10 30,000 10 3,000 50 x 60 10° 16' 43.680" 123° 44' 15.720"
9 10 30,000 10 3,000 50 x 60 10° 16' 37.920" 123° 44' 27.600"
10 5 30,000 10 3,000 50 x 60 10° 16' 53.400" 123° 44' 42.720"
11 5 55,000 10 5,500 110 X 50 10° 16' 36.480" 123° 44' 13.920"
12 5 55,000 10 5,500 110 X 50 10° 16' 31.800" 123° 44' 16.440"
13 10 25,000 10 2,500 50 x 50 10° 16' 28.560" 123° 44' 31.200"
TOTAL 150 665,000 66,500
A total 665,115 cubic meters peak storm drain will course through the creeks traversing
the quarry site and the delineated silting ponds will be more than adequate to detain
storm drain. Silt retained in each pond will be easily harvested. Recovered silt from the
ponds will be dried, transferred and mixed with the base coarse materials sold by the
Company.
1.8.7 Lagoons
Two (2) lagoons in low-lying basinal areas observed to accumulate rainwater, will be
established, and protected (see Figure 1. 4), to detain 100% of peak run-off volume to
avoid flashflood in downstream areas due to vegetation removal in quarry area,
likewise for rainwater harvesting to support project dust suppression and vegetation
irrigation. The lagoons have an average depth of five (5) meters, and also serve as
receiving body for overflow from the silting ponds.
Stockpile drainage will be provided around the waste soil stockpile areas to divert
runoff away from stockpile toes (Figure 1. 12). A silt trap will be constructed to serve as
a water catchment basin to address potential problems related to damage of nearby
farms and exceedance of the water quality standard; stockpile areas will be carefully
selected to have proper natural drainage features (Figure 1-7).
49
Figure 1. 10 Crushing Plant Water System Schematic Flow Diagram
50
Plate 1. 3 Existing Crusher Line 1 Stockpile Footprint Area and Holding Capacity
51
Figure 1. 11 Soil Dumpsite Location Selection Criteria
Dump site 1: 13,464.13 21,149.41 123° 44' 29.5691" 10° 16' 47.3304"
Dump site 2: 9,107.06 14,305.34 123° 44' 59.1596" 10° 16' 34.8568"
Subtotal 22,571 35,455
Topsoil
33,952.70 53,333 123° 44' 16.6334" 10° 16' 41.1255"
Stockpile
Organically-rich top-soil will be carefully stockpiled, for later use as base soil material
for nursery and tree planting operations.
52
Plate 1. 4 Aerial View of Present Explosive Magazine Building
PROJECT DESCRIPTION 53
Figure 1. 13 Explosives Magazine Lay-out
PROJECT DESCRIPTION 54
1.8.9 Explosives Magazine
The existing quarry operations are supported by an outsourced blasting contractor,
Conex Philippines. Conex is a multinational company providing blasting services for
mining and civil work applications. It has installed an explosives magazine 600 meters
from proposed location of Crusher Line 2 and 1.3 km from the Crusher Line 1. Three
separate buildings store ANFO, dynamite and blasting caps (see Figure 1. 13). The
existing building of 150m2 can store 79,100 kg or 79 tons ANFO. The separate 48m2
building can store 25,300 kg or 25 tons dynamite. A separate building with 10.5 m2 floor
area stores ordinary blasting caps, which may number 1 million pcs at one time. The
facility is managed by a licensed mining engineer who holds a Foreman Blaster’s
License. It is 800 meters from the nearest residential cluster.
temperature and biodiversity. Riparian zones are likewise good sediment filters,
trapping silt in surface run-off and reducing water siltation. Maintaining environmental
balance includes protection of the riparian zone. Buffer zones of twenty meters inland
from both sides of the creek banks will be protected from clearing activities and
planted with bamboo to restore the riparian buffer zone in the quarry site.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION 55
1.8.13 Nursery
A total area equivalent to at least 10,000 m2 (1 hectare) nursery will be operational to
supply the Project seedling requirements buffer zone replanting. The current nursery
with an area of 384.89m2 with growing capacity of 10,400 seedlings will be augmented
with additional area to be established within an idle and suitable area within the MPSA.
The existing nursery facilities are listed in Table 1.11.
A similar set of nursery equipment will be provided in the expanded nursery area to
support commitments for environmental buffer zone establishment under this EPRMP.
A total annual target seeding production of 23,000 is aimed to be produced starting in
2024. New seedling development operations will start every June 1, or so, using highly
viable planting materials gathered in the general wooded areas of Cogon and Lanas.
After 90 days in nursery, new plants will be transferred by September to pre-prepared
destinations (river sides, balding hillsides in Camp 8 and Guindarohan, Mt. Naupa,
others), while under the rainy season. About 5000 m2 will be devoted to raise grass
species lost from the quarry site, for use as soil cover in progressive rehabilitation phase
as further extraction will be requested under MPSA renewal. The existing nursery lay-
out, planted species and personnel are found in Annex 45.
The source of planting materials to be propagated for buffer zone replanting and mine
rehabilitation will be the existing flora within the MPSA (Table 2.1-23) to ensure species
suitability, except for species that are suitable for charcoal making and fuelwood , such
as the Acacia (Acacia mangium), Ipil ipil (Leucaena leucocephala) and Bagalunga
(Melia dubia). Table 4.1 also provides the list of ground cover species that were found
in the site in 2004 and were not observed in 2021 survey. It is the intent of the Proponent
to coordinate with the local community on acceptable species to be planted (and
preserved) to help ensure that they, being residents in the area, will help protect and
maintain the planted trees.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION 56
1.8.14 Administrative Buildings and Workshop
The JLRCAI will construct one Field office and Maintenance shed made of permanent
materials, within the premises outlined for Crushing Line 2 (Table 1. 3). These offices will
be equipped with sanitary facilities for use by the project staff and occasional visitors.
A total of 204 personnel will ultimately work in the quarry and crushing Line 2 facilities
and septic tank size of 13 cubic meters meeting the requirement as per guidance from
Table B3 of the Plumbing Law (R.A. 1378).
For the expansion of Crusher Line 1 production, no additional building construction will
be necessary. A total of twenty-eight (28) personnel will ultimately operate expanded
Line 1 operations. The existing sanitary facilities will need to be augmented to make
available additional two (2) cubicles and total septic tank capacity of 3 cubic meters
to meet the requirement of R.A. 1378 when expanded Crusher Line 1 will operate.
Since all present and future employees of JLR are/ will be from the host and neighboring
Barangays, no permanent accommodation buildings will be necessary.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION 57
Item Specification Location No. of Units
• Sales Office
• Line 1 Control Room
• Fuel Station
• HP 3 Cone Crusher
• HP 300 Cone Crusher
• Tunnel Grizzly Motor
• Primary Control Room
Centralized Circuit 3
Breakers
Crusher 1 Office Fire 2
exits
Safety Signages 20
Safety Alarm System 1
Evacuation Area 1 For quarry personnel Quarry 200 m2
and equipment. On
elevated and open
space
Evacuation Area 2 For crushing personnel Crushing Plant 1 300 m3
and mobile equipment
Evacuation Area 3 For quarry personnel South Quarry 500 m3
and equipment. On
elevated and open
space
Free potable water is readily available to all employees at the canteen, office corridors
and designated rest places.
A Health and Safety Officer conducts daily safety inspections of the work in the quarry
and crushing plant and conducts weekly safety meetings. Additional Safety Officer will
be hired, such that one Safety Officer will focus on the quarry and crushing operations,
respectively.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION 58
1.8.19 Personnel Safety
Personnel safety is given priority by JLRCAI. Regular safety refresher orientations /
trainings are conducted twice yearly. PPEs issued include PPE High Visibility /
Reflectorized vests, Reflectorized Safety Helmets/Hardhats for quarry personnel, Safety
Shoes , Safety Goggles, Industrial Respirators, Hand Gloves, Ear Plugs. Muffs, for Crushing
personnel, Welding Face Masks with shaded vision window, industrial respirator for
protection against lung cancer and other illness associated with the fumes emitted
from using welding rods, & welding aprons to welders. The PPEs issued conform to
DOLE standards (OHS)
A 50-m2 Material Recovery Facility / Covered Shed will be established at the Crusher
Line 2 area to serve both Construction Phase and Operations Phase.
The existing 6mx6m (36 sq. m) area for hazardous wastes (for used oil, spent batteries
and busted light bulbs) storage and management in Crusher line 1 is sufficient to
contain the wastes to be generated from the increased production activities.
1.8.23 Equipment
The equipment to be used in the current and expanded quarry and crushing
operations are listed below.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION 59
Table 1. 13 Quarry Equipment and Respective Fuel and Power Requirements
EXISTING EXPANSION COMBINED
DESCRIPTION No. of Rated No. of Rated No. of Operating Diesel
Units Capacity Units Capacity Units Hours/day (Li/hr)
A. QUARRY EQUIPMENT
300 300 10 10
Drill, Pneumatic 4 4 8
m3/hr m3/hr
Bulldozer, D155 3 5 cu.m. 3 5 cu.m. 6 12 50
Backhoe, PC450 3 3 cu.m. 5 3 cu.m. 8 10 40
Dump Trucks, HOWO 20 15 cu.m. 30 15 cu.m. 50 10 10
Grader, XGMA 1 12 ft 1 12 ft 2 4 10
As per 8
Compactor 1 - 1
need
As per 10
Water Truck 1 15 cu.m. 1 15 cu.m. 2
need
B. CRUSHER MOBILE EQUIPMENT
C. CRUSHER FIXED
Line 1 Line 2 Combined
EQUIPMENT
Grizzly Feeder 800 m3/hr 10
1 2
The list of equipment requirements for crushing operations are given in Table 1. 14.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION 60
Table 1. 14 Crusher Equipment, Components & Respective Power Requirements
Power
Rated Total Operating Consumption
Quantity
Capacity kW Capacity kW Time (Hrs.) (kwH)
A. LINE 1
HP300 Cone
2 224 448 10 4,480
Crusher
Scalper 2 15 30 10 300
Vibrating Screen 1 30 30 10 300
Sand Dewaterer 1 30 30 10 300
Pan Feeder 3 7 21 10 210
Tunnel Conveyor 1 22 22 10 220
HP300 Discharge
1 22 22 10 220
Conveyor
HP3 Discharge
1 22 22 10 220
Conveyor
G-l Product
1 22 22 10 220
Conveyor
3/4 Product
1 22 22 10 220
Conveyor
3/8 Product
1 22 22 10 220
Conveyor
Sand Product
1 22 22 10 220
Conveyor
Return Conveyor 1 22 22 10 220
Control Room 1 2 2 10 20
Sales Office 1 2 2 10 20
QAD Office 1 3 3 10 30
Quarry Field Office 1 2 2 10 20
Motor Pool 1 5 5 10 50
Lightings 1 2 2 10 20
Water Pumps 5 3 15 10 150
Power Room 1 1 1 10 10
Sub-Total 767 7,670
B. LINE 2
Grizzly Feeder 1 11 11 10 110
Jaw Crusher 1 200 200 10 2,000
HP300 Cone
4 224 896 10 8,960
Crusher
Scalping Screen 2 15 30 10 300
Vibrating Screen 4 30 120 10 1,200
NS Conveyor 1 15 15 10 150
Wearing Conveyor
1 11 11 10 110
PROJECT DESCRIPTION 61
Power
Rated Total Operating Consumption
Quantity
Capacity kW Capacity kW Time (Hrs.) (kwH)
JLR crushing equipment are well-maintained, which partly account for JLR safety
record involving no accidents related to crushing operations, from 2016 to 2020.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION 62
Componen DAILY CHECK UP WEEKLY CHECK UP
t
3. Discharge chute free 3. Check discharge chute and
from stock materials liners from wear
2 HP300 1. Oil tank level 1. Piping for oil leaks
CONE
2. Clamping/Oil pressure 2. Grease adjustment ring
CRUSHER
at countershaft box threads
3. Close side setting 3. Check oil strainer in oil tank
for metal chips & flakes
4. Feed distribution 4. V belts tension and
alignment.
5. Oil flow and strainer 5. Check feed plate cap
basket screw for tightness
3 SCALPING 1. Screen cloth J bolt & 1. Grease main bearing
SCREEN clip bolt and tightness
(1845)
2. Square tube & 2. Grease propeller cross
brackets for cracks bearing and check for wear
3. Spring free from debris 3. Check discharge lip and
and stock materials chutes for wear
4. Check sheave pulley for
cracks and tightness on shaft.
5. V belts tension and
alignment.
4 VIBRATING 1. Screen cloth J bolt & 1. Grease main bearing
SCREEN (8' x clip bolt and tightness
20')
2. Square tube & 2. Grease propeller cross
brackets for cracks bearing and check for wear
3. Spring free from debris 3. Check discharge lip and
and stock materials chutes for wear
4. Check spray bars free from
debris
5. Check sheave pulley for
cracks and tightness on shaft.
6. V belts tension and
alignment.
5 DE 1. Check & clean bucket 1. Grease pillow block bearing
WATERING wheel free from foreign
WHEEL materials for free well.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION 63
Componen DAILY CHECK UP WEEKLY CHECK UP
t
6 CONVEYOR 1. Check carrier/return 1. Grease plumber block
FRAME & rollers free from stock bearing
BELTS materials
2. Visual check on tail 2. Check roller chain, pin from
and head pulley free wear
from stock materials
PROJECT DESCRIPTION 64
Componen DAILY CHECK UP WEEKLY CHECK UP
t
3. Roller chain curtain from
wear and alignment.
2 GRIZZLY 1. Oil tank level 1. Piping for oil leaks
FEEDER
2. Feed distribution 2. Grease main bearing and
propeller cross bearing
3. Grizzly bar free from 3. V belts tension and
stock materials alignment.
3. Spring free from debris 4. Check grizzly bar and
and stock materials discharge lip, liners from wear
5. Check sheave pulley for
cracks and tightness on shaft.
3 C120 JAW 1. Check V belt tension 1. Lubricate eccentric shaft
CRUSHER bearing
2. Check the tension and 2. Check wear on cheek
operation of the return plates
rod.
3. Check the tightness of 3. Check toggle plate for
jaw die and cheek plate alignment, straightness, and
bolts cracks.
4. Clean all safety signs 4. Check sheave pulley for
and ensure that they are cracks and tightness on shaft.
legible.
5. Check protection 5. V belts tension and
rubber of the toggle alignment.
plate.
6. Check the mounting of the
crusher.
4 VIBRATING 1. Screen cloth J bolt & 1. Grease main bearing
SCREEN clip bolt and tightness
(1845)
2. Square tube & 2. Grease propeller cross
brackets for cracks bearing and check for wear
3. Spring free from debris 3. Check discharge lip and
and stock materials chutes for wear
4. Check spray bars free from
debris
5. Check sheave pulley for
cracks and tightness on shaft.
6. V belts tension and
alignment.
5 CONVEYOR 1. Check carrier/return 1. Grease plumber block
FRAME & rollers free from stock bearing
BELTS materials
PROJECT DESCRIPTION 65
Componen DAILY CHECK UP WEEKLY CHECK UP
t
2. Visual check on tail 2. Check roller chain, pin from
and head pulley free wear
from stock materials
3. Visual check on tail 3. Check conveyor belts from
and head pulley plumber wear
block assembly free from
debris.
4. Chain guard intact 4. Check conveyor belt
and align. tension and alignment
5. Check tail pulleys free 5. Check sprockets for
from spillage and stock wear/cracks and tightness on
materials. shaft.
6. Check carrier/return 6. Roller chain tension and
rollers from wear alignment.
7. Check feed boat side skirt
from wear
6 INDUCTION 1. Visual check of drive 1. Check for loose
MOTORS motors free from foreign connections.
materials.
2. Check bolt and 2. Check blowers and cover
tightness for ventilation
7 GEAR 1. Visual check of drive 1. Check oil for
MOTORS motors free from foreign leaks
materials.
2. Check oil hose level 2. Check blowers and cover
for ventilation
3. Check bolt and 3. Check for loose
tightness connections.
8 FLAT FORMS 1. Free from foreign 1. Check frames from wear
& CATWALK objects and materials
Using the modified Soil Moisture Balance Approach (Annex 13), the estimated gross
watershed recharge from rainfall is 196,201.82 m3 in the driest month of April. Less
33,823m3 withdrawal for project requirements and 6,177 m3 requirement of the
PROJECT DESCRIPTION 66
populations of Barangay Cogon and Barangay Guidaruhan, there is an estimated
volume of 139,513 m3 that may flow partly to underground crevices / recharge local
aquifer, and partly to the sea (see Table 1. 16). The project water requirement in the
driest month of April is reduced by concentrating nursery operations during wet
months, and dust suppression in access roads is limited to sections with attendant
population. The watershed recharge volume is more than sufficient to meet the
domestic water requirements of the local population in extremely dry months of April
under this mode of water use management.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION 67
Activity Process Technology
flat steel plate footing for
short construction period.
Quarry site preparation Nursery preparation, Common technologies
access road and used in quarry site
development, water preparation
crossing construction,
vegetation clearing,
topsoil and waste soil
segregation and
stockpiling, settling pond
excavation, tamping of
lagoon bed surfaces
Material extraction Refer to Figure 1. Surface bench extraction
through hillside-controlled
blasting
Material transport to Refer to Figure 1. Dump truck of 100%
processing stage extracted material to
Crusher Line 2 for primary
crushing, overhead
conveyor transport of 30%
to crusher Line 1
Crusher Line 1 operations Please refer to Figure 1.17 Wet process
Crusher Line 2 operations Please refer to Figure 1.17 Dry process
Product transport to Loading to dump trucks, Land transport load
market delivery route control by distribution to minimize
Dispatcher traffic congestion impact
The mining operation is classified into two major stages, the Development Stage and
the Production stage. Site development will be undertaken during quarry expansion
to prepare a specific area for extraction. Quarry site development involves the
construction of access roads leading towards the targeted elevation of the mineable
area, vegetation clearing, stockpiling of topsoil and overburden to expose the
needed good quality materials. Topsoil with organic material are stockpiled for later
use as soil base and conditioner for vegetation of mined-out areas and for soil
enrichment of barren areas subject to reforestation. The working benches are then
prepared by leveling at the targeted elevation.
The production activities, such as in the continuing quarry operations and in the
expanded quarry area, will start with planning the height and slope of the bench cut
according to the rock quality of the specific area (see result of borehole investigation).
Material extraction starts with mine floor cleaning, using bulldozers to pile aside loose
materials for proper blasting. Drill holes are laid-out and pneumatic and hydraulic drills
PROJECT DESCRIPTION 68
are used to bore 76 mm diameter holes which are drilled in a pre-designed pattern
and depth depending on the rock quality and applicability of the blasting purpose.
The blasted materials are then pushed by Bulldozers towards the loading area at pit
bottom. Each production bench will be prepared to be cut in a retreating manner
starting at the topmost bench, and progress down in accordance with slope safety
and stability considerations, which will vary according to rock quality in various quarry
elevations.
After blasting, the blasted rock materials are pushed by bulldozers into a stockpile. A
backhoe loads the extracted materials from the stockpile on to haul trucks, which will
transport these to Crushing Plant Line 2. Materials designated for processing in Line 1
will be exclusively transported through the overhead conveyor from Line 2.
Construction
Engine Oil
Grease
Vehicle Tires
Batteries
Busted Light
Bulbs
100%=13.113 mt
Emission inventory for particulates using emission factors from USEPA AP42 indicate
that uncontrolled resuspended road dust using existing roads with 85% concrete
surface, account for almost 96% of total Project particulate emissions. At current
authorized maximum production of 500,000 cubic meters annually, uncontrolled
particulate emissions are computed to reach 156.43 tons per year. With regular road
watering, the annual dust emissions are estimated to be 32.65 metric tons per year
PROJECT DESCRIPTION 69
or 99 kilograms per day. The haul road proposed under this submission is a 4.5 km. all
weather road that will exit to the Talisay-Toledo Road. With shorter length and paved
surface, the estimated road dust at maximum 2 million cubic meters per year
transported materials is 121.75 tons per year or 67.08 kilograms per road-kilometer.
The existing uncontrolled emissions from Line 1 aggregate processing is 51.55 tons per
year or 1.66 kg. per hour or 16.63 kilos per day, under a 10-hour work day, 310 days per
year. Regular water sprinkling of dry operating areas particularly at the hopper that
feeds the overhead material conveying system, dust emissions are controlled by 90%,
to 166 grams per hour. The basaltic materials have relatively high specific gravity and
are not suspended in are for long periods of time. Sufficient harvested rainwater will
be available from quarry lagoons to supply Crusher dust suppression requirements. The
grounds of Crusher 2 will be compacted with aggregates and regularly wetted, for
dust suppression.
The USEPA Source Classification Codes for quarry blasting do not include factors for
particulate emissions (see Annex 14). Blasting dust emissions in the past, was a
complaint from the Cabuan High School (HS), which has not been experienced in the
recent months due to the practice of controlled blasting. Deferment blasting at
source area when the wind blows in the direction of Cabuan school and wetting the
ground at 5L per m2 prior to drilling and ANFO emplacement will be implemented. A
wind sock is already installed in the source area and this practice is already
implemented.
The emission inventory tables for Project operations are found in Section 2.1.39.
Emission inventory for the Project electricity consumption is found in Section 2.1.40. It is
also noted that the emissions from electricity generation by respective power sources
based on the maximum plant capacity and respective carbon footprint offsetting are
also included in the respective power plants’ ECC applications.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION 70
Figure 1. 15 Process Flow & Waste Streams, Site Preparation & Construction Phase
PROJECT DESCRIPTION 71
Table 1. 17 Estimated Wastes During Construction Phase & Pollution Control Methods
Total Estimated Wastes During Construction Phase
Crusher 2 Conveyor
Crusher 2 Crusher 1
Site Bridge Total Pollution Control Measures
Construction Upgrading
Preparation Construction
Pollution Waste
Domestic Waste (tons) 0.6 1.2 0.15 3.6 5.55 Zero waste system compliant with R.A. 9003
Discharge to and treatment in a seepage pit 30m3 seeded with
Kitchen Wastewater (m3) 30 60 7.5 180 277.5
phytoremediation species, e.g., vetiver grass or Lemnaceae
SUBTOTAL 30.6 61.2 7.65 183.6 283.05
Hazardous Waste
Septic Waste (m3) 0.60 1.20 0.15 3.60 5.55 3 portalet, 2 in quarry 1 at conveyor construction
Containment, filtration, storage, and re-use as additive to
Waste Oil & Grease (tons) 0.3 0.6 0.1 0.75 1.75
lubricant
Other Hazardous Waste
0.003 0.01 0.013 Incinerate or bury in a suitable landfill where permitted by EMB
(tons)
SUBTOTAL 0.90 1.80 0.25 4.36 7.31
Non-hazardous Waste
Topsoil stockpile area in quarry, 53,333 m3 capacity. This will be
Topsoil (m3) 60000 60,000
used in mine rehabilitation
Waste soil stockpile area, 35,455 m3 capacity. Will be used for
Waste Soil (m3) 170,000 170,000
project land surface levelling or sold as fill materials
This will be sold to accredited Material Recovery Agents (MRA).
Packaging Waste (ton) 2 0.8 0.75 3.55 These include pallets, fiberboards. styrophore and plastics that
will be hauled out to Naga City landfill
Recovery and re-use of waste steel. Steel scraps will be sold to
Construction Waste (tons) 2 1 2 5
MRA. Crushed waste concrete will be used in road maintenance
SUBTOTAL 230,000.00 4.00 1.80 2.75 230,008.55
Note: Other hazardous wastes include
• Spent vehicle batteries, zinc chloride batteries
• Busted light bulbs
• Sharps and first aid medical waste
PROJECT DESCRIPTION 72
Table 1. 18 Estimated Annual Waste Volume During Operations Phase & Pollution Control Methods
Quarry Site
Rock Conveyor Crushing
Preparation, Hauling
Drilling/Bl Bridge Operations Total Pollution Control Measures
Access Road Operations
asting Operations (Line 1 and 2)
Construction
Pollution Waste
Domestic Waste Zero waste system compliant with R.A. 9003
6.05 6.82 16.43 12.71 42.01
(tons)
Kitchen Discharge to septic tank passing through kitchen
grease trap. Kitchen grease trap daily treatment
Wastewater 302.25 341.00 821.50 635.50 2,100.25 capacity requirement is 4.74 m3 and 2.1 m3 in
(m3) Line 2 and Line 1 kitchens respectively
SUBTOTAL 308.295 347.82 837.93 0 648.21 2,142.26
Hazardous
Waste
Septic Waste Septic tanks. Capacity requirement is 5m3 and
6.05 6.82 16.43 12.71 42.01 2m3 at Line 2 and Line 1 respectively
(m3)
Containment, filtration, storage, and re-use as
Waste Oil & additive to lubricant. Storage space
0.2832 0.28 1.13 0.75 1.13 3.58
Grease (tons) requirements are 15 m3 and 6m3 at Line 2 and
Line 1, respectively.
Other Septic vault, incinerate or bury in a suitable
* Included in Crusher Line 1 waste landfill where permitted by EMB
Hazardous 2.63 2.63
where medical facilities are located
Waste (tons)
SUBTOTAL 6.33 7.10 17.56 0.75 16.48 48.22
Non-hazardous Waste Topsoil stockpile area in quarry area has 53,333
m3. The continuing reforestation, and nursery
development efforts will use this material. Excess
Included in quarry site organic materials may be shredded,
Topsoil (m3) 60000 60,000
preparation work composted, enriched/ cultured with
mycorrhizae, and sold as garden soil
Quarry waste soil stockpile area capacity is
340,000.0
Waste Soil (m3) 340,000 35,455 m3 capacity. There is a large demand for
0 backfill materials from the construction industry.
73
Figure 1. 16 Process Flow and Waste Stream, Quarry Operations
74
Figure 1. 17 Process Flow & Waste Stream, Overall Project
75
Figure 1. 18 Timeline of Project Activities
PROJECT DESCRIPTION 76
1.13 Development Plan, Description of Project Phases and Corresponding Timeframes
The Project has several phases which will overlap with each other as the project is
already operational. The schedule of the different project phases and activities are
summarized in Figure 1.18. Annex 10 provides the conversion factor from mass to
volume.
1.13.1 Construction of Crusher Line 2 and Overhead Conveyor, and Upgrading of Line 1
The construction of Crusher Line 2 and the overhead conveyor system will follow
standard engineering methods involving earthworks to prepare the land area. The
single-story administrative building to support the business in Line 2 will have a footprint
area of not more than 5,000 meters including workshop and water supply. The
construction will use approved prefabricated materials and will include the installation
of an overhead tank for domestic water supply. Power will be sourced from Visayan
Electric Company. Figure 1. 4 provides an overview of the Line 2 facility lay-out while
Figure 1. 27 shows the equipment and stockpile lay-out of Crusher Line 2 system.
With the approval of the amended production area, site development and several
access roads and bridges will be developed and constructed to reach to different
quarry production areas.
The quarry site development phase shall involve the following activities:
The processes of (a) vegetation clearing (b) overburden removal (c) drilling (d)
blasting (e) hauling constitute the mineral extraction process. These processes will
proceed on linear manner with reference to particular locations and cyclical in terms
of the extraction activities.
These activities prepare the site for the actual exploitation works, with the construction
of access roads leading towards the targeted elevation of the mineable area, linking
these back to Crusher Line 2, as well as construction of silt control and water supply
system for dust suppression.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION 77
In the Quarry Extraction, there are only two (2) quarry material products, namely; (1)
raw materials and (2) waste materials. The raw materials are basalt used in the
production of aggregates (G-1gravel, ¾” gravel, 3/8” gravel and sand). The waste
materials are the top soil and overburden materials (Pozzolanic and fill materials).
The pozzolanic materials have economic value and are sold commercially. These are
reported in the Semi-Annual Report to the Mines and Geosciences Bureau (MGB) on
Mine Wastes Produced, Contained and/or Utilized.
The coarse overburden materials are also economically valuable while considered as
“waste” in aggregate quarry production, thus these are sold commercially, and also
declared as part of the mineral resource and ore reserve.
In the production stage, the prepared working benches are then scheduled for
cutting by drilling and blasting activities. Each production bench being prepared are
cut in a retreating manner starting at the topmost bench and progresses down in
accordance with the benching design which extends ten (10) meters high per bench.
Final bench slope will be seventy (70) degrees with berm width of ten (10) meters.
Quarrying will be undertaken by drilling-blasting-dozing-loading combination system
of operation. The processes of (a) vegetation clearing (b) overburden removal (c)
drilling (d) blasting (e) hauling constitute the mineral extraction process. These
processes will proceed on linear manner with reference to particular locations and
cyclical in terms of the extraction activities.
Figure 1.24 shows the annual quarry slice plan for the first five (5) years of expanded
production while Figure 1. 26 shows the sectional profile of the same production
period. Figure 1. 25 shows the Final Mine Plan at end of MPSA life while Figure 1. 31
shows the design sectional profile by June 2029. Figure 1.30 show the rehabilitation
schedule of the first four (4) years of decommissioning, applied to the existing active
20-hectare quarry area.
The stripping of the topsoil and overburden to expose the desired materials is
necessary in preparation for surface quarry activities. Land clearing will entail clearing,
earth-balling, and transfer of trees less than 15cm diameter at breast height (DBH) to
pre-prepared designated tree planting area within the non-production areas of the
MPSA. Application for Tree Cutting Permit and Chainsaw Registration Permit Tree will
be submitted way ahead of time to ensure these are available when needed. The
trees will be manually removed, branches and leaves will be removed, shredded and
added to the top soil stockpile. Usable cut wood will be recovered and will be
donated to the Cogon Elementary School for use in school facilities such as benches.
The top soil from where trees were removed, will be stripped using a bulldozer. The
topsoil will be stockpiled in the designated location for later use in final mine
rehabilitation.
Not all products produced for commercial use require blasting, such as the coarse
and fine overburden.
78
Coarse overburden bereft of organic materials will be stockpiled separately as “waste
soil” and will be sold commercially as landfill materials.” . Fine tuffaceous overburden
materials (pozzolan) are also segregated at source and stockpiled separately.
Pozzolanic ( fine, highly weathered tuffaceous) materials are marketable for cement
manufacturing additive while coarse overburden are marketable materials as base
course for road construction, for road surfacing and backfilling materials for
embankments.
1.13.2.2 Drilling
Employing a hillside cut approach, the quarry operation involves the stripping of the
overburden, drilling, blasting, loading, and hauling. To make the mineable basalt rock
available for extraction, the topsoil and other weathered overburden materials are
stripped and transported to the rehabilitation area of the company.
Due to hardness of the basalt rock to be extracted, drilling and blasting are done.
Blast holes, measuring 76 mm in diameter and 10 meters (including a sub drill of 1
meter) in depth, are drilled using pneumatic or hydraulic percussion drills. Blasting is
done to break the materials from the mineable area using twenty to twenty-five (20 –
25) kg of dry ANFO per hole. Controlled blasting is resorted-to, through the use of
nonelectric delay detonators to minimize ground vibration, fly-rocks, and excessive
sound waves generation.
Blasting
Due to hardness of the basalt rock to be extracted, drilling and blasting are done.
Pneumatic or hydraulic percussion drills are used to bore 76 mm diameter holes for
the blasting operations. Holes are drilled in a pre-designed pattern and depth
depending on the applicability of the blasting purpose.
The blast holes are drilled to a depth of eleven (11) meters, for the entire ten(10) meter
bench height plus one (1) meter sub drill (see Figure 1. 20)
79
Figure 1. 20 Sectional View of the Drilling Pattern
80
Figure 1. 22 shows the blasting activity flow. Table 1. 20 shows the annual blasting
schedule until the end of MPSA life.
Mining Floor
Drillhole Lay-
Cleaning Drilling Operations Drillhole Sounding
outing
Hauling
Loading to Dump to
trucks Crushing
Plant
81
Figure 1. 23 First 5-Years Quarry Slicing Plan
82
Figure 1. 24 Profile of First 5 Years Slicing Plan
83
Table 1. 20 Annual Blasting Schedule
YEAR 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029
Annual
500,000 500,000 700,000 1,000,000 1,200,000 1,400,000 1,600,000 1,800,000 2,000,000
Production (m3)
Monthly
41,667 41,667 58,333 83,333 100,000 116,667 133,333 150,000 166,667
Production
Daily Production
1,667 1,667 2,333 3,333 4,000 4,667 5,333 6,000 6,667
(m3)
BLASTING PARAMETERS:
Drill hole pattern 3m x 3m
No. of
14 14 20 28 34 40 46 51 57
Holes/Blast/day
2 2 2 3 3 4 4 6 6
Blasting Schedule blast/wk. blast/wk. blast/wk. blast/wk. blast/wk. blast/wk. blast/wk. days/wk. days/wk.
No. of Holes/blast 43 43 60 57 68 60 68 51 57
1.13.2.3 Hauling
The blasted materials are then pushed by Bulldozers towards the loading area at pit bottom, where waiting pay loaders push the materials into
a pile, and load these on to waiting dump trucks to be delivered to hoppers in Line 2, where the processing operations start.
84
Figure 1. 25 Final Mine Plan (2029)
85
Figure 1. 26 Section Profile (A-A) of Final Mine Plan
86
1.13.3 Mineral Processing
The raw materials from Basalt Quarry operations at present are being hauled by
truck and fed to the hopper of Line 1 processing plant, where the materials
undergo primary and secondary crushing, series of screening and size
classification. The products sold commercially are the following:
1. Base coarse – composed of topsoil, overburden and weathered rocks used for
backfilling and base preparations in the Construction Industry and as additives
in the production of Pozzolan Cement.
Line 1 under the new project set-up with the establishment of Crusher Line 2, will
operate secondary and tertiary crushing, and aggregate washing for special
products required by the construction industry.
From the Primary Stockpile in the In-Pit Crushing Plant (Line 2), an estimated 30% of
the crushed materials is expected to be transported through a 1-km Conveying
System and discharged to Surge Pile of the Existing Crusher (Line 1).
From the Surge Pile, the transported crushed materials passed the tunnel conveyor
through the Pan Feeder and conveyed to the Scalping Screen for further sizing.
Scalping Screen received the materials from the Surge Pile for secondary
screening. The undersize is conveyed to a four (4) deck Product Vibrating Screen
and the oversized will undergo Secondary Crushing using HP 300 Cone Crusher.
Cone Crusher with rated capacity of 300 cu.m. per hour is used as Secondary
Crushing for further size reduction. The resulting product has a maximum size of1-
1/2 inch for grade classification at the Vibrating Screen.
Vibrating Screen, (8’ x 20’, 4-deck), with rated capacity of 250 cu.m. per hour
receives the undersize from Scalping Screen and the crushed materials from Cone
Crusher for grade classification. A pressurized water sprinkler is introduced to
suppress the dust generated during screening action and to clean the products
from silts and sediments.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION 87
The oversize (+1-1/2”), is being recycled back to the system and pass to HP3 Cone
Crusher, a tertiary crushing equipment, for further crushing. The crushed materials
are being conveyed back to Product Vibrating Screen for grade classification.
The Gravel products (1”, ¾”, 3/8”) are conveyed separately towards its respective
stockpile while the Sand-Silt products are introduced first to a Sand Dewaterer for
final sand-silt classification.
Sand Dewaterer, with rated capacity of 50 cu.m. per hour receives the sand- silt-
water mixture from the Vibrating Screen for final classification. The underflow, Sand
product, is conveyed toward its own stockpile and the overflow,
Wastewater, will go towards the Settling Pond for treatment.
Treated Water Recycling. The main water requirement for the process is sourced
from Cogon/Guindaruhan River at a rate of 1,000 cubic meters per day average
using Pump No. 1 with rated capacity of 600 gpm. When Pond No. 2 is filled with
water (Water Capacity=5,500 cubic meters), this treated water will be the new
source of water in the process and will be recycled back to the system.
Vibrating Screen using Pump No. 2 with a rated capacity of 600 gpm. At this point,
Pond No. 3 (Water Capacity=3,000 cubic meters) will be used as the storage of
the slurry overflow from Pond No. 1. In this process, Pump No. 1 will not operate.
When the treated water in Pond No. 2 will be used-up, the fine silts at the bottom
will be desilted immediately overnight and stored at the Drying Bed then later
transferred to designated waste dump for future use. The following day treated
water in Pond No. 3 will be the new water source and the slurry from Pond No. 1
will be directed to the emptied Pond No. 2. If the water level in both Pond No. 2
and Pond No.3 becomes low, Pump No. 1 will operate to replenish water to both
water pond until full capacity. This methodology is repeatedly done for Zero
Discharge of Wastewater.
The trucks dump the blasted rock on to the Hopper and undergo primary
screening using Vibrating Grizzly Feeder with bar spacing of 3 inches. The oversize
will go directly to primary crusher (Jaw crusher ) while the undersize will pass to the
primary scalper to remove the fines and topsoil (Base coarse product) and the
cleaned rocks will go the Surge Pile as Primary Stockpile. Oversize rocks go to
Primary Crushing using a Jaw Crusher to reduce the quarry materials to a size
suitable for secondary crushing. The Jaw Crusher has rated capacity is 400 cu.m.
per hour and opening of 30” x 42” and discharge opening of 5 inches. All crushed
materials from the Jaw Crusher are conveyed to the Surge Pile for stockpiling as
Primary Stockpile. This primary stockpile has capacity of 50,000 cubic meters is the
PROJECT DESCRIPTION 88
source of crushed materials for secondary crushing for Line 1 and Line 2 Crusher
Production.
Care is always taken when building up and loading out surge piles, as this step is
the major source of segregation of materials going to the secondary plant.
Variation at this point may affect both material quality and gradation. Drawing
from an inverted cone over a load-out tunnel, works well after material has been
deposited and left undisturbed to form the walls of the draw-down cone. If the
need ever arises to consume the entire pile, care is taken to thoroughly mix the
older material a little at a time with fresh product to make the surge as uniform as
possible as the aggregate is being pushed into the tunnel.
The crushed material in the Primary Stockpile is conveyed to the secondary crusher
(Standard Coarse HP 300 Cone Crusher) through conveyor system, for further size
reduction. Output is discharged into a tunnel conveyor that passes a Pan Feeder
which conveys the materials to a 2-deck Scalping Screen for further sizing and to
the Vibrating Screen for product classification.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION 89
Figure 1. 2 3D Perspective of Crusher Line 2 Lay-out Plan
90
Figure 1. 28 Feed Hopper of Conveying System from Line 2 Crusher
PROJECT DESCRIPTION 91
Figure 1. 29 Discharge Chute of Conveying System
PROJECT DESCRIPTION 92
Plate 1. 5 Line 1 Surge Pile
PROJECT DESCRIPTION 93
HP 300 Std Coarse Cone Crusher with rated capacity of 300 cu.m. per hour each
is used as Secondary Crushing Equipment and received the oversize from the
Scalping Screen for further size reduction. The resulting product has a maximum
size of1-1/2 inch for grade classification at the Vibrating Screen.
ES402 Vibrating Screen, (8’ x 20’, 2-deck), with rated capacity of 250 cu.m. per
hour each receives the undersize from Scalping Screen and the crushed materials
from HP 300 Standard Coarse Cone Crusher for grade classification. The ES402
Vibrating Screen will produce G-1 Gravel products.
The oversize (>1-1/2”), is being recycled back to the system and pass to HP 300
Standard Fine Cone Crusher, a tertiary crushing equipment, for further crushing.
The crushed materials are being conveyed back to Product ES302 Vibrating
Screen for grade classification. The undersize will pass to another Vibrating Screen
for final screening to different product sizes.
The Products (¾”, 3/8”, sand) are conveyed separately towards its respective
stockpile.
Crushing plant Line 1 and the overhead material conveyor facilities are private
properties on private land. Consistent with DAO 2003-30, a detailed Abandonment
and Rehabilitation Plan will be submitted by JLRCAI to EMB Central Office within
six (6) months before the planned project termination, with a Request to EMB for
relief from complying with ECC commitments.
The JLRCAI aggregate processing activity is hoped to continue for another twenty-
five (25)years after 2029, until the end of mine life, after the renewal of Mineral
Production Sharing Agreement 194-2004-VII. The economic development in Cebu
is expected to require high quality aggregates and provisioning from MGB-
permitted and environmentally regulated sources will be a better option than
importing from unknown sources or being supplied from small scale quarries with
undetermined actual operating environmental impact.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION 94
In the event MPSA 194-2004-VII is not renewed, the quarry decommissioning
activity will commence on May 22, 2029.
Figure 1. 27 shows the Final Mine Plan terminating in 2029 and Figure 1. 28 shows
the section profile at end of life of the current MPSA. Figure 1. 31 shows the focus
of rehabilitation from 2029 to 2033 while Figure 1. 33 show the quarry area
reforestation sequence.
Quarry decommissioning activities are the following:
PROJECT DESCRIPTION 95
Activity Details of Rehabilitation / Decommissioning Activity
Code No.
Tree planting in mined-out areas (see Figure 1. 33). This will be the “end-of-
mine life” land use aimed at agri-eco tourism, or mixed use with eco-tourism
7
core zone with botanical garden of endemic and indigenous species.
Final environmental quality verification- air, water and soil quality sampling
and laboratory analysis, witnessed by EMB VII representative. All project
impact parameters must meet pertinent standards / guidelines, otherwise,
9 remediation must continue until government standards or guidelines are
satisfied. Submission of copy of laboratory result to EMB Central Office in
support to Request for Relief from ECC commitments.
Description Hectares
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 Lagoon No. 2 2.89 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
2 Topsoil Dump ✓ ✓ ✓
3.40 ✓
(Rehab Area 5)
3 Naupa Creek, ✓ ✓ ✓
3.72 ✓ ✓ ✓
Cabuan Lagoon 1
4 Crusher 2 area, ✓ ✓ ✓
16.83 ✓ ✓ ✓
Botanical Garden
5 Rehab Area 1&2 6.56 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
6 Rehab Area 3 &4 22.8 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
7 Rehab Area 6 &7 6.09 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
8 Rehab Area 8 &9 1.8 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
9 Rehab Area 10 &11 3.32 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
10 Rehab Area 12&13 2.16 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
69.57
PROJECT DESCRIPTION 96
Activities 9 and 10 (air, water and soil quality sampling, final inspections and
turnover of facilities and relinquishment of the MPSA will be done at the end of the
10th year of mine decommissioning and abandonment phase.
JLRCAI will be legally relieved of its ECC commitments and may abandon the
Project when EMB confirms its compliance to ECC conditions, and the final air and
water quality test results comply with environmental standards and guidelines.
JLRCAI considers the possibility that the ultimate land use plan of MPSA
rehabilitation will provide the ecosystem services intended by Government in
designating the area for forest land use though the restoration of tree cover and
habitat enhancement, with a land use zoning plan that allows a mixed-use area
for agri-eco tourism, a buffer zone and core conservation area.
A Forest land use classification is primarily designated as such, among others, due
to slopes that have high soil erosion rates and thus is physically unsuitable for
intensive land use due to continuing loss of soil nutrients and poor water retention
capacity and subsequent poor agricultural productivity potential and high
likelihood of abandonment in open, disturbed state, and downstream siltation
impact harmful to aquatic and coastal food production resources. These lands
are designated for watershed services to maintain ground water resources, and
lately, their preservation as carbon sink takes significant value for the human race
to stall the increasing effects of global climate change that bring extreme storm
category no. 5 as part of a “new normal” that brings significant damage to
economic assets (buildings, roads, bridges, government infrastructures) and lives.
At post-quarry phase, the particular JLR quarry site may also play a role in
preserving natural flora and fauna species, both aquatic and terrestrial. Many
endemic species are not fully studied, and these may hold secrets for future
medical and scientific benefit to the human race, aside from their value in
maintaining ecological balance.
The ecosystem services supporting aquifer recharge and species protection may
be provided in a JLRCAI final mine rehabilitation plan that is also self-sustaining
under a future pandemic scenario while contributing to local supply of food, jobs,
recreation, and a growing carbon sink.
These will be detailed in time, in the next JLR ECC application for further use of the
awarded MPSA.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION 97
PROJECT DESCRIPTION 98
Figure 1. 30 Map Showing Rehabilitation Areas of First 4 Years Decommissioning Activity
PROJECT DESCRIPTION 99
Figure 1.31 Section Profile of Final Mine Plan (2029)
102
1.14 Personnel Requirement
JLR Construction and Aggregates Inc. (JLRCAI) is currently employing 48 regular
workers, and 75 personnel under contractors for its Mine operation. Additional
personnel complement is expected to be deployed for the expansion project. The
general, specific breakdowns and annual distribution of personnel by component
are found Table 1. 24, Table 1. 25 and Table 1. 26 respectively, below.
A. JLR-QAD
Existing 6 6 36 48
Expansion 7 10 65 82
B. CONTRACTOR
B.1 Drilling and Blasting
Existing 1 3 18 22
Expansion 2 6 36 44
B.2 Hauling
Existing 3 3 47 53
Expansion 4 3 99 106
TOTAL
Existing 10 12 101 123
Expansion 13 19 200 232
PERSONNEL DISTRIBUTION
A. QUARRY DEVELOPMENT
1. Road Opening 10 20 10 10 5 5 5 5 5
2. Waste Stripping 10 10 10 10 4 4 4 4 4
Equipment used:
2 units Bulldozer
2 units Backhoe
Sub-Total 20 30 20 20 9 9 9 9 9
B. QUARRY PRODUCTION
1. North Quarry 72 72 72 74 76 78 80 83 85
2. South Quarry 40 74 76 78 80 83 85
C. CRUSHING PLANT
CONSTRUCTION
1. Line 2, In-Pit Crusher - 20 30
2. Conveying System - 10 20
3. Office/Motor pool - - 10
Sub-Total - 30 60 - - - - - -
D. CRUSHING PLANT
OPERATIONS
1. Line 1 31 31 31 28 28 28 28 28 28
2. Line 2 - - - 25 25 25 25 25 25
Sub-Total 31 31 31 53 53 53 53 53 53
E. TOTAL MANPOWER 123 163 223 221 214 218 222 228 232
PARAMETERS USED:
Annual Production, 000
500 500 700 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000
omitted
No. Of Dump trucks 20 20 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
No. of Drills 2 2 3 4 4 6 6 8 8
D. ENVIRONMENTAL COST
1. EPEP COST 107,080,000
2. FMRDP COST 20,000,000
3. SDMP COST 36,400,000
SUB-TOTAL 163,480,000
E. IN-PIT CRUSHING PLANT 1 assy. 110,000,000
F. CONVEYING SYSTEM 1 km 50,000/meter 50,000,000
G. LAND ACQUISITION 150 ha 100/sq.m. 150,000,000
TOTAL 911,245,000
The proposed JLR expanded quarry production project (henceforth, the Project)
having two components namely the quarry and the crushing operations, have two
(2) varying environmental settings for the quarry area and the crushing operations,
respectively, both of which are within MPSA 194-2004-VII. The quarry area and the
proposed Line 2 crusher are situated in an area within Forest Land Classification, in a
mountainous, sparsely populated region within the City of Naga. Annex 46 includes a
Certification from CENRO Argao indicating the JLR proposed expanded quarry area
is within Timberland (classification.) The City of Naga recognizes the forest vegetative
cover land classification of the area hosting the proposed JLR expanded quarry area
(see Figure 2.1-1). The existing Line 1 crushing plant with proposed increased
production from 460,000 m3 to 600,000 m3 per year, is situated in a relatively densely-
populated area approximately 1 kilometer slightly southeast of the quarry site.
Both the quarry and crushing operations will be located entirely in Barangay Cogon,
City of Naga.
The City of Naga has a land area of 10,217 ha. Most of the land cover in Naga is used
for forestry, agricultural, and economic purposes. The built-up area is only 20.83% of the total
land area. There are areas like wooded grassland (13.07%), shrub land (7.15%), and
grassland (4.80%) that are left idle yet provide good infiltration of rainwater into underground
water sources. The proposed expanded quarry production area accounts of 1.47%of the
Naga City land area.
The Project expanded quarry area, in-pit crusher Line 2 and the overhead conveyor
bridge will be within the approved MPSA 194-2004-VII (see Figure 1-1).
Under the Comprehensive Land Use Plan of the City of Naga, the MPSA 194-2004-
VII is located within a Mineral Zone in the Zoning Map (See Figure 2.1-1) and within Forestland
in Land Classification(See Figure 2.1-4).
2.1.1.1 Impact on Compatibility of Existing Land Use with Proposed Land Use
The proposed quarry expansion will have no conflict with the existing land use
designated by Government for the project area.
Figure 2.1-2 Location of Project Area Relative to Central Cebu Protected Landscape
Impact Assessment – Land Environment 111
Figure 2.1-3 Location of Mt. Naupa Relative to JLR Proposed Quarry Expansion Area
The proposed project is within an area classified as “forest land” (Figure 2.1-4) and the
valid tenure instruments would be related to agreements for Special Forest Land Use,
Community-Based Forest Management, Socialized Industrial Forest Management,
Industrial Forest Management, or agreements under the National Greening Program.
According to the record of the Community Environment and Natural Resources Office
(Argao), there are three families that have been issued Free Patents within the
Production Area (Annex 25). Among all the 52 claimant-families surveyed by the
CENRO and four families whose application for Free Patent were received, none are
among the 10 families who were surveyed at site in October 2021. It is noted that there
are no formal tenure arrangements in the Project area except MPSA 194-2004-VII.
Figure 2.1-5 shows the location of forest tenure agreements recognized by the Naga
City LGU. Technically, the Project has no conflict with existing land tenure claims on
the project site, as the private claims on forest land is not valid. The impact on the ten
(10) informal setter-families are discussed in Chapter 2.4, the People Module.
In October 19, 2019, EMB Region VII received a letter inquiring whether the JLRCAI
possess Environmental Compliance Certificate for their property found within the
premises of Crusher Line 1. A copy of the Tax Declaration issued by the Naga City
LGU indicate the property is in the name of JLRCAI (Annex 5 ).
Table 2.1. 3 Comparison of Project Site Features with Definitions of Environmentally Critical
Areas under Proclamation No. 2146
Project Condition
Meets the ECA
Definition of Environmentally Critical Remarks
Definition (Yes or
Area No)
1. All areas declared by law as
national parks, watershed The quarry area is within MPSA
No
reserves, wildlife preserves, 194-2004-VII.
sanctuaries
Site features and LGU land use
2. Areas set aside as aesthetic designate the area
No
potential tourist spots classification as a quarry sub-
zone.
3. Areas which constitute the Floral and faunal survey
habitat of any endangered or indicate no endangered or
No
threatened species of Philippine threatened species exist in the
wildlife (flora and fauna) Project site
The visual impact of the JLR quarry expansion on the surrounding landscape will be
significant during site preparation, operations phase and the first five years of site
rehabilitation phase, as the land cover will be stripped, the earth will be laid bare for
a time and replanted young vegetation is unable to cover the earth while young.
There will be green belt attending the perimeter shielding visual impact at human eye
level. The visual impact of open quarry areas will be spatially limited, with maximum
open quarry area not more than fifty (50) ha at any single time. The operating quarry
area will be benched and terraced with bench edge vegetation that will not be all
that unpleasant. At the end of quarry life, the area will be landscaped and
revegetated.
At the end of mine life, the Project site will be revegetated and bare will be
significantly reduced.
2.1.1.5 Devaluation of land value as a result of improper solid waste management and other related
impacts
2.1.1.5.1 Quarry Site and Crusher Line 2 Preparation Phase
During the site preparation phase, solid “waste” generation at the quarry and Crusher
Line 2 area will be mostly soil overburden with organic debris from land clearing and
levelling, respectively. This “waste material” are natural materials, not toxic or
hazardous to the environment and may be considered as resource for “fill materials”
to be produced and marketed by JLR (Section 1.11.1), and as topsoil for re-soiling or
for conditioning areas to be revegetated for site rehabilitation.
Environmental impacts from improper loose earth management include water quality
deterioration and riverbed aggradation discussed in Section 2.3.2 “Sedimentation of
waterways” and 2.3.5 “Change in Drainage Morphology”, respectively.
2.1.1.5.2 Crusher Line 1 upgrading, Crusher Line 2 and Conveyor Bridge Construction Phase
For the upgrading of crushing Line 1, construction of crusher Line 2 and overhead
conveyor, the expected solid waste to be generated include the following:
The quarry site is under forest land classification and its value lies in supporting a forest
ecosystem. Improper management of all types of wastes have potential to devalue
land and impair its capacity to perform their designated function.
Recycling and reusing used motor oil are preferable to disposal and can provide
great environmental benefits. Less energy is required to produce the required
lubrication fluids for machinery operation than to produce these from crude oil.
Multiple handling of used oils can pollute the environment if they are not handled
properly.
Quarry operations are expected to generate topsoil with organic components and
over burden without organic fraction. The estimated annual volumes based on
Section 2.1.4.2 is given in Table 2.1. 6 with respective required stockpile area. Stockpile
area requirements are computed based on maximum stockpile height of 3 meters.
The topsoil will be re-soiled into areas for purposive vegetative rehabilitation.
Overburden without organic component will form part of the “fill materials” that will
be sold by JLR.
The JLR crushing operations are feasible with company-controlled quarry operations.
The existing MPSA 194-2004-VII will expire on May 3, 2029 and MPSA renewal
application will be prepared early enough to have continuous operations.
Improperly managed wastes will devalue the private property occupied by Crusher
Line 1 and the modified landform that will be occupied by Crusher Line 2.
1. Derelict equipment
2. Waste stockpile
3. Solid and biological wastes from workers’ / employees/visitors’ facility
4. Hazardous wastes: Used Engine Oil, Containers of engine oil and construction
machinery lubricants, Batteries, Busted Light Bulbs,
Quarry site facilities that will have no further use and may be donated by the owners
to the local government unit include the following:
Improper solid and hazardous waste management can result in land pollution in the
project site and subject the JLR or its successor-in-interest to legal liability under the
2.1.2 Topography
The City of Naga is relatively hilly. Approximately 80% of the Municipal land area is
characterized by mountainous terrain, which includes the MPSA 194-2004-VII (see
Plate 2.1. 1). The river and creek banks have steep to nearly vertical inclinations. The
highest point in Naga City is Mt. Naupa, also within Barangay Cogon with apex at
elevation at 560 meters above mean sea level (masl). It is located with Block 1 of the
MPSA, three (3) kilometers east of the expanded production area (Figure 2.1-3).
Existing Quarry
2.1.3 Elevation
The natural elevation in the proposed quarry expansion area range between 50 to
450 masl, with elevations between 100 to 300masl accounting for 53% of the land area
(Figure 2.1-7).
The Project will reduce the average land elevation in Project site from 250 to 216 masl
(see Table 2.1. 7 and Figure 2.1-8).
Slope gradient is a very important feature in determining land use suitability. The
existing predominant slope in the expanded production area is within the 30-50%
classification range (see Figure 2.1-9 and Table 2.1-10). The proposed material
extraction activities will increase the percentage of flat to slightly rolling terrain from
15% to 68%. Slopes >30% will mostly be confined to the bench face and remaining
unextracted mineralized portions, comprising 33 % of the production land area (Table
2.1.10.
Steep slopes are suitable to forest land use, which is the currently land classification of
the area. Table 2.1. 8 indicates the land use suitability of the different slope categories.
8-18 % Agricultural
30-50% Forest
>50% Forest
landslide Area
Slope Description
susceptibility Characteristic
Gently sloping areas with no landslide history Low
Moderately steep slopes with soil creep and other Moderate
indications of landslide occurrence present
Steep to very steep slopes underlain by weak High ✓
materials, Escarpment and tension cracks are
observed.
Source: Adapted from DO 151S. 2015
The quarry activities will modify the slopes in the project area from predominantly
steep and mountainous, to mostly level or nearly level (see Table 2.1.10). Land with
slopes below 18% slope gradient have lower landslide susceptibility.
Minimal change in area surface landform, topography and slope is expected during
preparation phase for Crusher Line 2 construction. The area pre-selected for Crusher
Line 2 location is already relatively flat, having been prepared during previous basalt
material extraction.
The process of material extraction and corresponding changes in land elevation and
slope gradient will be gradual from 2022 to 2029. The MGB-approved material
extraction method currently applied by JLR is also designed to stabilize the slope at
and during extraction phase.
Approximately half of the expanded production area will have reduced elevation
and slope gradient.
Lands with lower slope gradients are less susceptible to soil erosion (Table 2.1. 9) and
have higher capability to retain water and soil nutrients and over time. Given soil
Figure 1.4 shows the designated stockpile location while Table 1-10 indicates the soil
stockpile area capacity.
Soil loss will be continuous during quarry operations as surface material will be
benched and extracted. Nothing is lost in terms of soil agricultural suitability as the
inherent soil nutrient contents of nitrogen, potassium, phosphorus and organic matter
which are necessary to nourish plant growth, are deficient (Table 2.1.18).
The volume of eroded soil during quarry operations will vary across various slope
categories according to the Universal Soil Loss Equation (USLE). Table 2.1. 11 was
generated using GIS analysis of existing project area slope characteristics and
provides an estimate of soil erosion at 2021 baseline condition.
The significant soil erosion volume expected in active quarry areas are mitigated with
the provision of contour canals and settling ponds to receive and contain eroded soil
which are transported by run-off from the quarry areas. Regular desilting of contour
canals and settling ponds recover earth materials which are dried and prepared for
the market as fill materials.
If for some reason eroded soil are not directed to contour canals and regularly haled
out as part of mine environmental maintenance, eroded materials are carried into
Impact Assessment – Land Environment 133
the waterways, cause these to aggrade, overflow, cause localized waterlogging,
damage quarry road sections which will increase mine vehicle maintenance and
operating cost, to a certain extent reduce mine operating efficiency due to lost time
caused by vehicles immobilized in deep mud.
Table 2.1. 12 Comparison of Average Annual Soil Loss at end of MPSA Life
2021 Average 2029 Slope 2029 Average
Soil Loss
Slope Class Annual Soil Distribution Annual Soil Change
/hectare (ton)
Erosion (MT) (ha.) Erosion (MT)
0-3% 0 nil 77.4 nil
3-8% 1.05 2.61 11.5 12.12 10
8-18% 6.97 129.29 12.2 84.89 -44
18-30% 26.21 982.35 0.27 7.08 -975
>30% 26.21 2,344.48 5.53 144.94 -2,200
TOTAL 3,458.73 43.1 1,130.18 -2,329
Reference: Modified USLE, BSWM.
At final mine rehabilitation phase, regular desilting / maintenance of contour canals and settling
ponds will recover soil for topsoil amelioration for area revegetation.
2.1.5 Geology
2.1.5.1 Tectonic Setting
The Philippine Archipelago is in a dynamic setting with the convergence of the Pacific
and Philippine Sea Plates in the East and with the Continental Eurasian and Indo-
Australian Plates from the West and Southwest of the Proto-Philippine Island Arc. Data
from the MGB publication Geology of the Philippines indicates that the uplifting of the
Philippine plate has resulted from the tectonic activities imposed by the surrounding
plates (Figure 2.1-11 below) which also have caused the various associated
formations in in the Cebu landform.
Cebu is tectonically bounded partly on the East by the left-lateral slip or sinistral
Philippine Fault System and on the West by West-facing Quaternary volcano-plutonic
arc related to the Negros Trench (Figure 2.1.12 Geologic and Tectonic Map of the
Philippines). The island of Cebu is located on a volcanic arc; it has been subjected to
variable uplift and subductions from tectonism. Cebu is arched in the central portion
and was uplifted variously during the Plio-Pleistocene geological period. The island is
believed to be a large anticlinal structure with exposed basement unit in the central
portion. Florendo (1987) and Santos-Yñigo (1951) postulated that the basement is
composed of thrusted allochthonous blocks composed of varying lithologies (e.g.,
schists, volcanic rocks, and sedimentary rocks). Dimalanta et al. (2006) regarded the
slivers of dismembered oceanic lithospheric fragments observed in Cebu Island as
part of the basement complex. Recent dating of the volcanic rocks yielded Early
Cretaceous ages (Deng et al., 2015).
Northeast – Southwesterly trending faults and folds system with numerous obliquely
cutting small - scale fractures are dominant in Cebu and these appeared to be nearly
parallel to the Sulu- Zamboanga-Masbate arc (Mitchell, et. al; 1986). Santos - Yñigo
has subdivided Central Cebu into three (3) principal structural units which are
bounded by rift zones of pronounced NE - SW lineation, namely: the northern highland
(Daanbantayan Lineament), central highland (Central Cebu Fault System-Central
Cebu Segment) and the southwestern highland (CFS South Cebu Segment). The
central highland area is separated from the northern highland area by the
Cabagdalan fault and from the southwestern highland area by the Uling - Masaba
fault and the northern extension of the Lutac - Jaclupan fault.
The central highland is a broad elongated dome trending NE – SW that has been
uplifted in horst structure by many NNE – SSW trending faults. These faults are generally
vertical and steeply dipping whose displacements are also largely vertical (Santos,
Yñigo; 1951). In the northern portion, Jurassic Tunlob Schist is in the N - S and NNE - SSW
faults. In the southern portion of the central highland, two (2) parallel faults namely
the North Barot fault and the Cantabaco fault bounded the porphyry copper deposits
of Atlas Consolidated Mining and Development Corporation (ACMDC). The Central
Cebu lineament runs through the cities of Cebu, Talisay, Danao, Naga and Toledo,
and cuts across the towns of Compostela, Minglanilla and Balamban.
Source: USGS
Relative
location of
Project Site
Figure 2.1-13 Synthetic profile across Panay, Negros & Cebu islands showing structural relationship between continental
platform & Visayan Sea Basin
Source: Geology of the Philippines, Ed.2. Publication of the Mines and Geosciences Bureau
The Cebu mainland is a long and narrow island, extending 200 km north to South
and extending 20 to 40 km East to West, and about 40 km wide at its widest. It is
situated within the central Philippine physiographic province and is encompassed
by the Visayan Sea Basin. The Cebu Island is separated from Bohol Island by the
Bohol Strait, from Negros by the Tañon Strait, and from Leyte by the Camotes Sea. It
has a mountainous backbone running on NNE-SSW axis, parallel to the Sulu-
Zamboanga-Masbate arc-trench system. The axis of Cebu Island is about 160 kms.
long and flanked by intermediate highlands, heavily dissected by deep narrow
valleys with steep slopes. The backbone range is divided into two parts, separated
by a slow saddle about 300 meters high at the narrow waist of the island. Maximum
elevation in the northern part is 1,013 meters and 884 meters in the Southern part
(MGB, 1981). It is structurally divided into three areas by the Northeast-Southwest
trending faults (see Figure 2.1-14), with several other minor but important fault
structures. These faults dominantly had vertical movements between Cretaceous to
Tertiary, but later exhibited left-lateral strike-slip displacement during the Pliocene. In
the Central Highland area, rotational movement of a rhombic fault block consisting
of basement rock units has been reported. Intrusion of the Lutopian Diorite, the
emplacement of serpentinite slivers and introduction of metallic mineralization were
controlled by faulting and rifting activities in the geologic past. Folding of the
Pliocene-Pleistocene sediments generally follow the Northeast trending fold axes.
The Northern part of Cebu exhibits northwest to North-south fold axes.
The coastal plains are of limited area and the coastline is fairly straight with a few
harbors, indicating a young wave erosion stage. Capping the island are shallow
marine sedimentary units reflecting a record of emergence towards the South of
Visayan Sea Basin.
According to a report of the Bureau of Soils for Cebu, the major landforms and type
of soils that developed in the province are:
a. Active Tidal Flats - soil material composed of mix river and sea current
deposits, characterized by deep, submerged soils with organic fragments
such as animal, plant and pronounced micro relief.
b. Broad Alluvial Plains - whose slope ranges from 0 to 3% - clayey to clay loam,
soil-accumulation of clay, silt, sand, gravel and fragments of mix volcanic and
sedimentary origin, composed of upper river terrace, lower river terrace and
coastal alluvial plain.
c. Residual slopes - nearly level to gently sloping, elevation in limestone area and
coastal limestone terrace ranging from 50 to 200 meter above sea level (masl)
with slope up to 14%, with clay loam to clay texture. Erosion is slight to
moderate.
d. Foot slopes elevations ranging from 20 to 25 masl. Erosion is slightly
hazardous. Soil at lower foot slope lie on shale/sandstone. Soil is silt loam to
clayey soil.
e. Karst Plain Type Rock - consisting of boulders/stoniness, escarpments and
sinkholes in limestone.
Figure 2.1-15 shows the Geomorphological Map of Naga and Minglanilla where the
MPSA 194-2004-VII is located.
One of its own exposures lies in the adjacent barangay north of the project site.
The upper Oligocene Cebu Formation unconformably overlies the Mananga Group,
characterized by at least two lithologic subdivisions namely the lower clastic units,
which are comprised of coal bearing siltstone/shale with conglomerate at its base.
Typical formation belonging to this subdivision are the Masaba Formation (Corby,
et.al) and Guindarohan Conglomerate (Balce) at the base of the sequence. The
upper subdivision consisted of massive orbitoidal limestone to which the Ilag
Limestone (Santos, Yñigo), and upper Cebu Orbitoid Limestone (Balce and
Hashimoto; 1977) preferably belong. This formation is notably widespread within
Central Cebu Highlands.
Overlying the Malubog Formation is the Middle Miocene Uling Limestone, which
occurs in the eastern and northern parts of central highlands. It is conformably
overlain by Middle Miocene Toledo Formation, which occur in the outer margins of
the central highlands. This formation consisted of thick sequences of calcareous
shale, siltstone and sandstone with intercalating, non-persistent beds of highly
indurated, greenish tuff and bentonitic tuff with typically exposed in Barangay
Pandan, Naga, Cebu. Formation. It is divided into Lower Limestone, a Middle
Conglomerate, and Upper Sandstone - Shale members.
Carcar Formation of Pleistocene age is the most prominent lithology fringing the
coastal areas of Cebu Island. This formation is composed primarily of massive to
bedded, generally crumbly to slightly hard in places, algal to generally coralline
limestone with marly limestone and calcarenite intercalations. Typical exposures
along the areas of Cebu generally exhibit a horizontal attitude but occasionally dip
towards the coastal areas at a maximum angle of 20 degrees.
Quaternary Alluvium compose mostly of silt, sand, and gravel generally covers the
rest of the coastal areas and alluvial flats.
Bulacao Andesite occurs in the central highlands and may have been emplaced
during Middle Miocene. It generally consists of massive volcanic flow and
pyroclastics.
Serpentinized Peridotite occurs along major fault zones as diapers in the central
highlands. This may have intruded during the Miocene (E. C. Mantaling, et al; 1988).
The geologic map of the Project site indicates Mananga Group of Cretaceous to
Paleocene age underlie a major portion of the proposed expanded quarry
production area. Locally, the group is composed of the Cansi Volcanics and the
Pandan Formation (Santos Yñigo, 1951; Hashimoto and Balce, 1977 in BMG 1981).
Published geological maps (Sheet No 3750-IV BMG, 1981) show a pyroclastic rock
formation with intercalated clastic sedimentary rocks occupying a large part of block
2 which corresponds to the Pandan Formation of earlier years. The Cansi Volcanics
which is made-up mainly of basaltic to andesitic lava flows occupies large portions of
MPSA blocks 1, 3 and 4. However, due to the difficulty of separating the Cansi
Volcanics from the Pandan Formation, both formations were referred-to as part of the
Mananga Group in the 2004 EIS.
Results of site 2002 geologic survey showed that the Cansi Volcanics occupy portions
of Block 4, which is outside of the currently proposed expanded production area.
Exposures showed a moderate to high degree of fracturing and weathering. The
rocks appeared to have several facies exhibiting fine-gained through finely
porphyritic to coarsely porphyritic textures. Amygdaloidal features were also noted.
Specimen samples subjected to micro-chemical and physical test showed no
reaction to cold HCI but exhibited slight magnetic property. The Pandan Formation
occupies large areas in all the blocks. Traverses reveal that the Pandan Formation
consists of a sequence of andesitic to basaltic pyroclastics and lava flow, sandstone,
conglomeratic sandstone, calcareous mudstone, siltstone and limestone. The
andesite and basaltic pyroclastic and lava flows are moderately to highly fractured
but generally hard. The conglomerate is matrix-supported and calcareous. Clasts
include andesitic and basaltic rocks and limestone. The sandstone grades from fine
to medium gained with conglomeratic portions.
The limestones have grayish color and appear to be partly made-up of finely
crystalline calcite. This could be an indication of slight metamorphism. Weathered
surfaces show fossil features standing out and giving rise to a rough surface.
Paleontological analysis result indicates the age of the rock as Early Cretaceous which
formed in a shallow marine environment. An exposure along a creek in block no 2
show large limestone block within the formation. It appears that the limestone is a
large clast within the formation.
The basal conglomerate member of the Late Oligocene to Early Miocene Cebu
Formation occurs on a small portion of the southwest corner of block no.4. Road cut
exposures show moderately weathered matrix and clast supported facies. The clasts
are subrounded to rounded and range in size from granule to cobble.
Unconformably overlying the older rocks is the Malubog Formation of Early Miocene
age. The formation occurs as an eye-shaped body occupying portions of Blocks 1
and 2. It is in fault contact with the Mananga Group and the younger Maingit
Formation. It consists of mudstone, shale and sandstone with occasional beds of
conglomerate, limestone, carbonaceous shale and coal. The rocks show moderate
to high degree of weathering. It is also moderately to highly fractured. Mudstone
and shale outcrops have light to dark brown color.
The Late Miocene Maingit Formation occurs on the southern sections of blocks 1 and
2. It is in fault contact with the Mananga Group and the Malubog Formation. It
The conglomerate is matrix-supported and poorly sorted. The clast varies in shape
from angular to subrounded and mainly pebble to cobble in size. Clast composition
include clastic material derived from older rocks, limestone and meta-volcanics.
Cobble to boulder size floats of a mineral and various rocks were noted along the
main Guindaruhan River and its tributaries. These include feldspar, schist, gabbro and
Serpentinized peridotite. A very large boulder of feldspar was observed along the
main river north of the quarry site. The mineral has a dull grey to white color. The
gabbro exhibit alternating bands of dark and light-colored minerals. The dark ones
are probably pyroxenes with olivines and the light colored are feldspars (plagioclase).
Several Serpentinized peridotite floats were observed northwest of the quarry site and
along the creeks. The source of the floats was traced from the diapiric intrusions along
a previously unmapped northeast trending fault in block 3, distinct from the earlier
identified major northeast trending faults that traverses the area. This recently
mapped structure was initially thought to be the contact between the Cansi
Volcanics and Pandan formation during reconnaissance phase of the survey. The
follow-up surveys reveal both rock formations occurring on both blocks of the fault.
Trenching and test pitting results reveal that the area generally has thin soil cover
rarely exceeding 30.0 cm. This indicates high degree of erosion. This is expected
though due to the steep inclination of the slopes and large sections of the area are
cultivated. Areas that have thicker soil cover were observed along or near the gulley
floors. Moderate to intense weathering was observed in the rocks underlying the
westernmost (no. 4) block. One area showed a weathered horizon more than a meter
thick.
The 2015 survey included the drilling of ten (10) bore holes to depths of 100m, in pre-
selected areas (see Figure 2.1-18). The borehole investigation confirmed the location
of desired aggregates, Cretaceous age volcanic rock- Cansi member of the
Mananga Formation. It generally consists of pyroclastic rocks of tuff, lithic lapilli tuff,
crystal ash tuff and conglomerates intercalated with minor basaltic to andesitic lava
flows. It is generally regionally metamorphosed.
The materials are selected for minor blasting and crushing requirements.
Source: PHIVOLCS
2.1.5.6 Geohazards
The Seismicity Map of Visayas (Figure 2.1. 20) indicates that most of the earthquake
epicenters are located near known active faults and subduction zones (Figure 2.1-14).
As may be noted, no earthquake epicenter occurred within a 10 km radius of the
project site since 1900. Thus, the project site is not in a zone considered as seismically
active. There are a few isolated clusters of earthquake epicenters that appear
unrelated to known active faults. These isolated earthquake epicenters probably
indicate the high possibility of finding yet unrecognized active faults but none of these
are within a 50 km radius of the City of Naga.
From 2012 to 2017, three strong earthquakes occurred within 140 km. of the Project
site, and these were also strongly felt in Cebu. Table 2.1. 13 indicates the recent
strongest earthquakes recorded from active faults nearest Cebu Island:
An earthquake occurred in Bohol on October 16, 2013 with Ms. 7.2, at a depth of focus
of 12 kilometers. The earthquake was felt in the whole Visayas area, and as far as
Masbate Island in the north and Cotabato provinces in southern Mindanao. It was the
deadliest earthquake in the Philippines in 23 years since the 1990 Luzon earthquake. It
produced an approximate 50 kilometers- long, 12 kilometers wide northeast trending
zone of uplift in north-western Bohol, with an approximate 8 kilometers long
discontinuous ground rupture indicating predominantly reverse‐slip movement on a
southeast dipping fault. Documentation of the nearly continuous northern terminus of
the 2013 Bohol earthquake ground rupture revealed its association to preexisting
scarps of the previously unmapped, Quaternary‐active North Bohol Fault.
The Philippine Fault Zone (PFZ) is a major active fault, traversing the eastern corridor of
entire archipelago from Mati, Davao in Mindanao, to Bangui, Abra in the Cordillera
Region (Figure 2.1-14). Earthquakes occur in different segments of the PFZ annually,
with ground rupture in several locations in the past fifty years. Geological features
associated with the fault system, such as fault scarp, displaced mountain ridges, and
valleys, stream offsets, and fault line valleys, strongly demonstrate that the fault trace
in the Visayas has ruptured in the recent past\1. The PFZ Leyte Segment located about
137 km east of the Project site, moved on August 23, 2017 with Ms.6.5.
Close to the MPSA 194-2004-VII, PhilVolcs identified two traces of the Central Cebu
Fault System in their Fault Finder app, two (2) meters and 18 meters from the
southeastern boundary of the proposed expanded quarry area respectively (Figure
2.1-21). Although there is insufficient evidence showing that the Cebu Fault System
(CFS) moved in the last 10,000 years, the possibility of future movement may not be
discounted.
.
Impact Assessment – The Land 154
2.1.5.6.3 Landslides
A landslide occurs when a mass of rock, debris, or earth moves down a slope, under
direct influence of gravity when forces acted upon by gravity exceed the strength of
the earth materials that compose the slope.
As seen in the Landslide Hazard Map of Cebu (Figure 2.1- 22), the larger portion of
proposed expanded quarry area has high to moderate susceptibility to landslide,
owing to its mountainous terrain and highly weathered rock formations.
During site preparation and quarry operations phase, area landslide susceptibility will
tend to increase due to reduced soil cohesion resulting from removal of vegetation
and root systems that contribute to slope stability, and the presence of loosened or
blasted and unhauled materials saturated with rainfall and located on steep slopes.
The primary causes of land subsidence are the removal of underground water,
compaction, drainage of organic soils or sediment transport, resulting in reduction of
the elevation of the land surface. Other causes of subsidence include underground
mining or removal of massive volumes of ground water, coupled with immense
increase in land surface pressure from material or equipment load. The nature of
surface material extraction activities (surface quarry) does not promote the factors
that cause subsidence. The location of heavy facilities has been identified in
consideration of the soil bearing capacity required by these heavy facilities.
Mud or debris flow may be possible during site preparation and quarry operation
when vegetation clearing and overburden removal are carelessly undertaken
without proper stockpiling of “waste” materials.
2.1.5.6.5 Liquefaction
Fully saturated loose, cohesion-less sand is considered as the soil type most vulnerable
to liquefaction. The highly weathered rock and soil materials in the Project site have
granular and crystalline formations and thus are highly resistant to liquefaction. The
clayish soil overburden in several portions of the production area persist to a maximum
depth of 1.5 meters. No clay soil layer > 1 meter thick was intercepted during the
drilling activities. Soil liquefaction in the project site is not expected, considering the
absence of currently active and extremely strong seismic forces acting on Cebu
Island that is sufficient to induce liquefaction of rock materials underlying the project
land area.
The Project is a surface quarry activity, with final surface elevation at 125 meters above
sea level. The surface quarry activities are not expected to generate changes in sub-
surface geology or underground conditions.
There is no active volcano within 60 kilometers from the project site (See Figure 2.1-
23The nearest active volcano is Mt. Kanlaon in Negros, located at a distance of 67
km.
2.1.5.6.8 Tsunamis
The project site is seven (7) kilometers from the shoreline and sits on elevation above
fifty meters above sea level. It is not within the range of tsunami hazard areas identified
by the Naga City Government (see Figure 2.1-24).
2.1.5.6.9 Flooding
The project area sits on elevation ranging from fifty to three hundred fifty meters on
rolling terrain with efficient drainage system. The Flooding Hazard Map of Cebu (Figure
2.1-25) identifies no flooding hazard in the proposed quarry expansion area.
However, starting from the densely populated area around the JLR Crushing Line 1
area up to the mouth of Guindarohan river, an area of slightly more than five hectares
(5.12 ha) is highly susceptible to flooding during rainy season due to attending almost
flat terrain (Figure 2.1-25).
During site preparation and quarry implementation, the Project has high potential to
contribute to increasing the flooding hazard downstream of Project site when project
sediment control is poorly implemented.
Note: Circles are active volcanoes while triangles are GPS observation stations. Modified from Aurelio, 2000. Geology of the Philippines, MGB
The soil characteristics below are derived from the JLR 2004 EIS and the Naga City
Comprehensive Land Use Plan 2022-2026, while the soil map is sourced from the
Bureau of Soils and Water Management.
The soils in Naga are of six types, namely: Faraon Clay, Faraon Clay Steep Phase,
Mandaue Clay Loam, Baguio Clay Loam, Hydrosol, and Lugo Clay.
Within the proposed expanded production area, the dominant soil type is Baguio
Clay Loam, followed by Faraon Clay and Mandaue Clay Loam comprising of 70%,
25% and 5% of the production area respectively (see
On February 8, 2021, soil samples were retrieved from locations in Figure 2.1-28 to
update information on the physical and chemical properties of the soils veneering
the area under study. The information will likewise provide baseline information on
the presence of basic soil macronutrients which gauge soil capacity to support
healthy food crops. The baseline content of diesel carbon chains, an important
impact parameter for industrial activities in open soil were also tested in samples
taken from the main roadway at Crusher Line 1, the planned vehicle loading area
in Crusher Line 2 and the existing quarry production area. The laboratory certificate
is found in Annex 15.1.
There are three basic soil macronutrients required for successful crop cultivation:
Nitrogen, Phosphorus, and Potassium. Nitrogen helps leaf growth and protein
production, phosphorus supports seedling growth, while potassium makes sure
nutrients and water travels within the plant. Table 2.1. 17 indicates the fertility rating
of soils for basic required macronutrient for plant growth. The results of analysis for
the basic soil macronutrients in JLR Project site are shown in Table 2.1.18.
Table 2.1. 18 Result of Soil Nutrient Analysis in Direct Project Impact Area
Sampled February 8, 2021
The projected changes in the quality and fertility of the soil are as follows:
1. The area will receive more frequent compression from the weight of heavy
equipment operating in the area, causing soil degradation. The area will be
de-vegetated and graded. Soil will be further separated and
unconsolidated and any little available soil nutrients are expected to
expected to be washed down. Soil capability to support vegetation further
declines.
2. containing information on Project area soil quality indicates the area as
having coarse to granular soil with relatively good moisture retention
capacity (>20%) but deficient with regard the basic macronutrient
requirement for healthy crop growth.
3. Surface soil will be removed during site preparation, together with soil
vegetation. Without proper care on removed topsoil, or soil amelioration as
post-construction restoration, the poor soil quality will further degenerate
and harshly barren surface soil will hardly be able to support vegetation to
cover and protect itself. This is an environmental damage.
Topsoil which has developed over millennia will be removed. While the
remaining underlying soil is deficient in nitrogen, potassium, phosphorus and
organic matter, basalt being an igneous rock is rich in trace minerals like iron,
cobalt, zinc, and manganese and silicon that help plants resist drought and heat.
These strengthen plants cell wall and promote resistance to extreme climate.
Fine silt transported by rain to contour canals and settling ponds are
therefore good soil ameliorants, together with macro nutrients nitrogen, potassium
and phosphorus.
Enriched topsoil will be restored to the mined-out areas under the Final Mine
Rehabilitation Plan required by the Mines and GeoSciences Bureau, to support
reforestation consistent with the Forest Land Classification of the area. The soil
quality that will be endeavored by the project for plant growth will have higher
values of Nitrogen, Potassium, Phosphorus and Organic Matter than baseline
condition.
Quarry operations will involve the use of lubricants and diesel fuel oil in heavy
equipment operation in all its phases. The mechanical components of crushers will
also require regular lubrication. The occurrence of some leaks and spills of lubricants
and diesel fuel is expected during project site preparation, construction, quarry and
crusher operations.
The spillage of fuel or lubricants on project soil from a few heavy equipment and
several haul trucks are not expected to be significant, as fuel and lubricants
constitute project resources, and regular, consistent wastage will not be tolerated
by management.
Contamination of soil with some oil or grease subjects the contaminated materials
to volatilization, biodegradation, partitioning into water, and photodegradation.
Residues of denatured diesel oil and common machinery lubricants in soil will
become soil carbon will enrich the soil provided these so not exceed accepted
environmental standards.
The content of petroleum (diesel) hydrocarbon in soil at crusher plant Line 1 and
active quarry areas were analyzed through CRL laboratory, as a screening tool to
evaluate compliance to the EMP in 2004 EIA. The analysis for petroleum used EPA
Methods 8021 and 8260,
The information on vegetative cover of the proposed expanded production area was
derived through site visual observation during the survey for flora and fauna and
mapped with the aid of google earth data and measured with the aid of ARCGIS
software. The vegetation cover found in the proposed expansion area is listed in Table
2.1. 20.
It will be observed from Figure 2.1-30 that the largest portion (60 to 70%) of the
area was identified in the 2004 EIS as “Grassland” based on the Soil Cover Map of the
Bureau of Soil and Water Management, and the area used for agricultural crops was
10-20%. In the 2021 vegetation cover data, we find that the area covered with
agricultural crops is not much different, around 14% and the “grasslands” now cover
78%. It is noted that while the BSWM system for soil cover description has a “wide area”
delineation while the FMB/NAMRIA digital land cover map has clearly-defined area
cover descriptions, both maps are complementary and generally confirm with what
was observed on the ground (Figure 2.1-29). The reduced percentage of area
covered by agricultural crops and increased percentage of area covered by
brush/shrubs are consistent with the fact that the soil is not very conducive to
agricultural cultivation due to erosion-prone natural slope gradient. The area being
under forest classification has also been abandoned by former Free Patent applicants
and “awardees” due to poor soil suitability. Without pervasive human disturbance,
the process of natural succession turned the grasslands into shrublands and wooded
grasslands (Table 2.1. 20).
The entire 336 hectare-MPSA was assessed for possible quarry operations under the
JLR Basalt Material EIS 2004, where quarry plans for twenty (20) hectares were
approved .
On March 06-08, 2021 terrestrial flora survey was conducted, using as reference the
then latest officially available Land Cover Map from FMB (dated 2010, page 1, Annex
16), to guide the sampling locations. Three (3) sampling locations representing the
Table 2.1. 21 summarizes identified terrestrial ecosystem survey sites using definition per
DMC 2005-005 and the actual land cover observed during the survey.
N.B.: Location of mapped features are indicative. An unresolved inconsistency in map location of JLR project area vs. JLRCAI ground survey data is attributed to characteristic of available FMB land cover shapefiles.
The following is the formula used in summarizing the data for ground Cover:
Biological communities vary in the number of species they contain and record
of the number of species present helps in understanding the structure and nature of
the community. The number of species in a community is referred to as species
richness.
Diversity indices measure species diversity and richness in a community. The
indices calculated for this study includes the required Shannon Wiener Index of
Biodiversity (H’) and Index of Evenness (J’).
Impact Assessment – Land Environment 180
2.1.7.1.1.5 Shannon-Wiener Index of Diversity (H’)
Shannon-Wiener Index of Diversity (H’) is used to determine species diversity. It
is a widely used biodiversity index that combines species richness and evenness and
also is not affected by sample size. For this index, the larger value of H’, indicates a
greater uncertainty. The index increases with the number of species in the community.
However, in practice, H’ does not exceed 5.0 for biological communities
The following is the formula of H’:
i=1
Where;
J’ = H’/H’max
Where;
J’ = Index of Evenness
i=1
s
C = - ∑ (Pi2)
i=1
Where;
C= Dominance Index
Pi= The proportion of individuals
I= 1, 2…, n
Table 2.1. 24 Biodiversity indices of the trees present in the sampling sites
BIODIVERSITY INDICES
Sampling Plot Shannon-Wiener Evenness (J’) Dominance Index
(H’) (C)
20x20 2.865 0.869 0.9356
5x5 2.794 0.830 0.9164
IUCN is the widely understood system for classifying species at high risk of global
extinction. While DAO 2017-11 is an administrative order issued by the DENR last 02
May 2017 to establish an updated national list of threatened Philippine plants and
their categories as well as list of other wildlife species.
Distribution status of the species refers to either they are native species, indigenous
species or endemic species.
A copy of the 2004 EIS for the JLR Basalt Material Quarry Project provided data to
compare the result of 2021 survey, to assess JLR project impact on the floral
community in the proposed quarry expansion area. The term “2003 survey” and “2004
EIS” are used interchangeably below and refer to the same data set available in the
EIAMD archives.
The following are the key findings of the 2021 flora assessment:
Comparing the two assessments (2003and 2021), it can be concluded that the area
of study previously had low terrestrial flora biodiversity and low endemicity. And in
2021 has moderate flora diversity and the same low endemicity. The Shannon-Wiener
Index of Diversity (H’) value for the tree species collected from the 20mx20m quadrats
is 2.865 and 2.794 from the 5mx5m quadrats.
Contrasting the two studies (2003 and 2021 assessments), the previous assessment
reported that there was no known threatened or endangered flora species collected
and observed. From 2003 to 2021, two species slid to riskier categories either under
Near Threatened or Vulnerable by IUCN Red List 2020 and two (species) are under
Vulnerable category as per DAO 2017-11. Their existence in the site indicates the
absence of actual threat to survival. The presence of the Project in the area was able
to control widespread kaingin or “slash-and-burn” farming in the area reported in the
2003 EIS.
In terms of species richness, twenty-five (25) tree species and forty-seven (47) ground
cover species were observed and listed in the previous assessment. In the current
assessment, fifty-four (54) tree species and twenty-four (24) ground cover species are
recorded. The species richness index slightly increased.
From the 20mx20m quadrats, a total of 127 tree individuals and 27 tree species under
14 families were identified; From the 5mx5m quadrats, total of 143 tree individuals and
29 tree species under 16 families were identified; From the 1mx1m quadrats, a total of
The dominant tree species identified in the 20mx20m quadrats is Melia dubia
(Bagalunga) (14 individuals) while for 5mx5m (saplings, shrubs) quadrats is Psidium
guajava (Guava) (26 individuals).
The majority (59.20%) of the trees in the study site are in the young classification, 0 to
20.32 cm DBH class based on Richards’ Ideal Distribution. If using the classification
under FMB Technical Bulletin No.3, the majority (35.04%) of the trees in the study site
are in the DBH class 10cm, possibly because the area is able to regenerate itself when
slash and burn farming is controlled.
All observed species in the quadrats, except for the following, have not yet been
assessed as per the IUCN Red List, while these are listed in the Catalogue of Life: Carica
papaya, Mangifera altissima, and M. indica are data deficient. Dillenia philippinensis
(common name Katmon) is categorized as Near Threatened. Katmon is a favorite
garden ornamental species. Pterocarpus indicus (common name Narra), is
categorized as an Endangered species. Narra is a common Philippine reforestation
species and planted in industrial plantations due to its high value wood used in
furniture and architectural finishing uses. The other 35 listed tree species are
categorized as Least Concern, and the population are either increasing, stable, (large
population but) decreasing, unknown or need updating.
All observed species in the quadrats are not listed under DAO 2017-11 except for
Mangifera altissima which is listed as Vulnerable and Pterocarpus indicus which is listed
as Endangered.
Three (3) observed tree species are categorized as endemic: Ficus odorata, Dillenia
philippinensis and Diospyros discolor (5%) while twenty-one (21) species are
considered as native (31%) and the remaining are introduced species (64%).
The percent ground cover of the study areas ranges from 5% to 100%, with 83% of the
species are introduced and 17% are native.
The Index of Evenness (J’) of tree species in the proposed quarry expansion project is
0.869 from the 20mx20m quadrats and 0.830 for from the 5mx5m quadrats (young
trees). Both indices suggest near complete species evenness.
The Dominance Index (C) of tree species found during the survey is 0.9356 from the
20mx20m quadrats and 0.9164 from the 5mx5m quadrats, indicating the high
dominance of one (1) species and low species diversity.
There was no keystone terrestrial flora species identified in the study area, that is, no
floral specie was identified that performs a role such that its possible loss could lead
to ecosystem collapse or invasive species may take over and dramatically change
and alter the condition of the ecosystem. Currently, there are no formally designated
keystone species and scientists debate which plants or animals in a particular
ecosystem deserve the title (National Geographic).
Figure 2.1-35 graphs the total of 127 tree individuals and 27 tree species under
14 Families that were encountered during the survey. The most dominant tree
species found is Melia dubia (Bagalunga) (14 individuals), followed by Gliricidia
sepium (Kakawate) & Pterocarpus indicus (Narra) (both 13 individuals).
Figure 2.1-36 below shows the tree diameter size class distribution from the
survey data, per age class. Majority of the encountered trees are in young
phase (74 individuals or 59.20% of the total inventoried population), (43
individuals or 34.40% of the total surveyed population) are established, (5
individuals or 4.00%) are in maturing phase and 3 individuals or 2.40% of the
total inventoried population are mature.
It is noted from Figure 2.1-30 obtained from the 2003 Project EIS, that the
baseline predominant soil cover was GRASSES (“70% -80%”).
70
60
50
43
40
30
20
10 5
3
0
Young Trees Estabished Maturing Mature
Figure 2.1-36 Relative Tree Age Class Distribution Based on the DBH
50 48
46
40
30
20
20 16
10
4
1 1 1
0
Class 10cm Class 20cm Class 30cm Class 40cm Class 50cm Class 80cm Class 120cm Class 130cm
Using FMB TB No.3 metrics, the majority of the surveyed tree individuals fall within
Class 10cm (48 individuals or 35.04% of the total inventoried population),
followed by Class 20cm (46 individuals or 33.58%), Other DBH Classes are: Class
30cm (20 individuals or 14.60% of the total inventoried population), Class 40cm
(16 individuals or 11.68% of the total inventoried population), Class 50cm (4
individuals or 2.92% of the total inventoried population), Class 80cm (1
individual or 0.73 % of the total inventoried population), Class 120cm (1
individual or 0.73 % of the total inventoried population) and Class 130cm (1
individual or 0.73 % of the total inventoried population).
1, 1% 2, 2%
3, Annona muricata Anonaceae
2% 3, Mangifera indica Anacardiaceae
1, 2, 2%
2%
1% Pterocarpus indicus Fabaceae
1, 1%
1, 1% Gliricidia sepium Fabaceae
1, 1%
9, 7% Melanolepis multiglandulosa
2, 2% Euphorbiaceae
Artocarpus heterophyllus Moraceae
1, 1% 12, 9%
Swietenia mahogani Meliaceae
Pterocarpus indicus
Melia dubia Meliaceae
11%
Fabaceae
10%
Melanolepis
multiglandulosa
Persea americana
Euphorbiaceae, 9, 7%
Lauraceae
2%
Swietenia
mahogani
Tamarindus indica
Meliaceae
Fabaceae
5%
2% Artocarpus heterophyllus
Syzygium simile Moraceae
Myrtaceae 2%
2% Theobroma cacao
Malvaceae
1%
Table 2.1. 27 shows the percent cover of quadrats per transect. For the overall
surveyed areas, 2021 data shows an overall average of 75.25% cover, no
difference compared to the “70% to 80%” average grass cover reported in the
2004 Project EIS.
Table 2.1. 28 below shows the species and respective families present in ground
cover quadrats in the five (5) established transects.
Tree Species
Acacia mangium Acacia Least Concern, Not Listed Introduced
Unknown Pop’n
Trend
Adenanthera Malatanglin Least Concern, Not Listed Native
pavonina Stable Pop’n
Trend
Annona muricata Guyabano Least Concern, Not Listed Introduced
Stable Pop’n
Trend
Antidesma bunius Bignay Least Concern, Not Listed Native
Stable Pop’n
Trend
Antidesma Bunot Bunot Least Concern, Not Listed Native
montanum Stable Pop’n
Trend
Artocarpus Nangka Not Listed Introduced
Not Evaluated
heterophyllus
Averrhoa bilimbi Kamias Not Evaluated Not Listed Introduced
Azadirachta indica Neem Tree Least Concern, Not Listed Introduced
Stable Pop’n
Trend
Barringtonia asiatica Botong Least Concern, Not Listed Introduced
Need Updating
Bauhinia monandra Fringon Not Evaluated Not Listed Introduced
Bixa orellana Atsuete Least Concern, Not Listed Introduced
Stable Pop’n
Trend
Carallia brachiata Bakawan Not Listed Introduced
Not Evaluated
Gubat
Carica papaya Papaya Data Deficient Not Listed Introduced
Casuarina Agoho Least Concern, Not Listed Native
equisetifolia Stable Pop’n
Trend
Chrysophyllum Kaimito Not Listed Introduced
Not Evaluated
caimito
Cratoxylum Pagolingon Least Concern, Not Listed Native
sumatranum Stable Pop’n
Trend
As per the International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN), a taxon is Not
Evaluated when it has not yet been evaluated against the criteria for conservation.
On the other hand, per DENR DAO 2017-11, the classification of the threatened
species as Critically Endangered, Endangered, Vulnerable, and “Other Threatened
Species” is based on the best scientific and internationally accepted criteria. In the
same Table 2.1. 29, all the encountered species are not listed under DAO 2017-11
except for Mangifera altissima and Pterocarpus indicus which are Vulnerable and
Endangered, respectively.
The presence of these near threatened, vulnerable and endangered species in the
study area underscores the significance for the need to implement conscious
biodiversity conservation effort in this regard, particularly at the Mt. Naupa Eco
Reserve as it can be a repository of important species and may host a microcosm of
a balanced natural ecosystem and genetic bank for present and future generations.
The results of Shannon-Wiener Index of Diversity (H’), Index of Evenness (J’) and
Dominance Index (C) of the species in the project site per quadrat is presented below
in Table 2.1. 30:
In Table 2.1. 30, for the tree species encountered, the value of H’ of flora is 2.865 for
from the 20mx20m quadrats and 2.794 from the 5mx5m quadrats. These values can
be interpreted using Fernando Scale indicating moderate diversity index. The
ecosystem of the area is still in a stable condition.
Table 2.1. 32 shows the evenness values for tree species in the study area as 0.869 for
the 20mx20m quadrats and 0.830 for the 5mx5m quadrats. This implies that the number
of species in the study area are evenly distributed hence, more diverse. Both numbers
signify near complete evenness or stable community based on the Krebb evenness
index below.
Table 2.1. 32 Categories by Evenness Index
Relative Values Category
The dominance index relates to the diversity value. Dominance index (C) values
reveal whether particular species dominate a community. The higher the diversity
value, the lower the dominance value. Dominance values range from 0 to 1, and may
be interpreted by the following categories:
Table 2.1. 30 shows the dominance index of tree species in the proposed project site
as 0.9356 (for 20mx20m quadrat) and 0.9164 (for 5mx5m quadrat) signifying high
dominance which is not in conflict with the computed moderate diversity value.
TREE SPECIES
Certain riparian flora were observed in the proposed JLR expanded quarry
area. Riparian flora are those that thrive in water-land transition zones along
creekbanks banks. These provide an important function in river bank soil erosion
control, sediment filtration, provide shelter and shade for fauna that are dependent
on the waterways at some point in their life cycle, or feed on aquatic plants,
associated insects and amphibians.
Table 2.1. 35 Some Riparian Flora Species Observed in JLR Project Site
Scientific Name Common Name Family Name
TREE SPECIES
Antidesma montanum Bunot Bunot Phyllanthaceae
Barringtonia asiatica Botong Lecythidaceae
Ficus hauili Hauili Moraceae
Ficus odorata Pakiling Moraceae
Ficus pseudopalma Niyog-niyogan Moraceae
Ficus ulmifolia Is-is Moraceae
Garcinia morella Batuan Clusiaceae
Gliricidia sepium Kakawate Fabaceae
Gmelina arborea Gmelina Verbenaceae
Leucaena leucocephala Ipil-ipil Fabaceae
Macaranga tanarius Binunga Euphorbiaceae
Mangifera indica Mangga Anacardiaceae
Morus alba Mulberry Moraceae
Psidium guajava Bayabas Myrtaceae
Streblus asper Kalios Moraceae
Swietenia mahogany Mahogany Meliaceae
Syzygium simile Panglomboen Myrtaceae
Theobroma cacao Cacao Malvaceae
Vitex parviflora Molave Verbenaceae
GROUND COVER SPECIES
Centrosema pubescens Pukinggang Baging Fabaceae
The flora assessment in EIA 2003 used point-quarter sampling method for the
assessment of shrubs and saplings, line-intercept technique for the assessment of
vegetation in open and cultivated areas, grassland and weed communities, and
lastly only a listing of undergrowth species that were not part of the two sampling
methods. The survey area likewise reported the total 336 MPSA area. The total number
of sampling points was not mentioned. In the current survey, nested quadrat is used
for the assessment of the flora. 20 units of 20mx20m quadrats, 20units of 5mx5m
quadrats, 20 units of 1mx1m quadrats and opportunistic sampling in 5 established
transect lines, only three (3) of which represent the land cover within the proposed
expanded quarry area, and two transect lines are outside of the production area to
serve as reference for future assessments.
The 2003 assessment discussed the low diversity and endemicity of species from
encountered shrubs and saplings. It also noted the abundance of Gliricidia sepium,
Leucaena leucocepahala, Trema orientalis, and Macaranga spp. Nine (9) species of
shrubs and saplings belonging to 7 families were recorded then, while it noted the low
density and frequency of intermittent tree and shrubs along the transects. For the
undergrowth, it noted that the Zea mays was the dominant species in grassland. And
the predominant species were Imperata cylindrica, Saccahrum spontaneum and
Lantana camara, indicating poor soil nutrient conditions. Also noting the dominant
presence of the weeds Mikania cordata, Chromolaena odorata, Stachytarpheta
jamaicensis, and Chrysopogon asciculatus. Per report, 12 species belonging to 6
families were noted.
Impact Assessment – Land Environment 234
In the current study, from the 20mx20m sampling quadrats, total of 127 tree
individuals and 27 tree species under 14 families were assessed; for the 5mx5m
sampling quadrats, total of 143 tree individuals and 29 tree species under 16 families
were assessed; for the 1x1 sampling quadrats, total of 24 ground cover species under
15 Families that were assessed; and for the opportunistic sampling, total of 16 tree
species under 13 Families were listed. Dominant tree species in 20mx20m sampling
quadrat is Melia dubia (Bagalunga) (14 individuals while for 5mx5m sampling quadrat
is Psidium guajava (Guava) (26 individuals). The dominant species in 2021 assessment
are not necessarily tolerant of depauperate soil. Rather these are common in newly
opened forest areas.
The 2003 and 2021 survey results are incomparable as the two studies use
different methodologies. Table 2.1. 36 is an attempt to compare the species observed
in the MPSA in 2003 and those observed during the 2021 survey.
Table 2.1. 36 Comparison of Flora species gathered in 2003 & 2021 Surveys
SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME 2003 2021
TREE SPECIES
Acacia mangium Acacia ✓
Adenanthera pavonina Malatanglin ✓
Albizia procera Akleng Parang ✓
Alstonia scholaris Dita ✓
Annona muricata Guyabano ✓
Antidesma bunius Bignay ✓
Antidesma ghaesembilla Binayuyu ✓
Antidesma montanum Bunot ✓
Artocarpus heterophyllus Nangka ✓ ✓
Averrhoa bilimbi Kamias ✓
Azadirachta indica Neem Tree ✓
Barringtonia asiatica Botong ✓
Bauhinia monandra Fringon ✓
Bixa orellana Atsuete ✓
Buchanania arborescens Balinghasay ✓
Carallia brachiata Bakawan Gubat ✓
Carica papaya Papaya ✓ ✓
Casuarina equisetifolia Agoho ✓
Chrysophyllum caimito Kaimito ✓
Cratoxylum sumatranum Pagolingon ✓
Delonix regia Fire Tree ✓
Impact Assessment – Land Environment 235
SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME 2003 2021
Dillenia philippinensis Katmon ✓
Diospyros discolor Kamagong ✓
Erythrina variegata Dapdap ✓
Ficus benjamina Salisi ✓
Ficus cf balete Balete ✓
Ficus hauili Hauili ✓ ✓
Ficus minahassae Hagimit ✓
Ficus nota Tibig ✓ ✓
Ficus odorata Pakiling ✓
Ficus pseudopalma Niyog-niyogan ✓
Ficus ulmifolia Is-is ✓
It is noted in the previous report that there was no known threatened or endangered
flora species in the MPSA. The current study notes that as of 2021, two species in the
production area are categorized either Near Threatened or Vulnerable i.e., Dillenia
philippinensis as Near Threatened and Pterocarpus indicus as Endangered species in
the IUCN Red List 2020. Similarly, DAO 2017-11 lists Mangifera altissima and Pterocarpus
indicus as Vulnerable and Endangered, respectively.
2.1.7.6 Historical occurrences of Pest Infestation, forest/grass fire and/or similar incidences
During the IEC activities and in the gathering for Public Scoping, the Barangay
Captains and Barangay Health Workers were taken as Key Informants with a
qualifying question since when they resided in the Project Barangays. Upon learning
they have lived in the area since birth, the inquiry as to whether there was any past
occurrence of pest infestation, forest/grass fire and/or similar incidences in the area,
was posed. All replies were in the negative.
The flora population that was surveyed did not experience any episode of pest
infestation or grassfire.
Fauna in general, is one of the core indicators, in terms of spatial biodiversity and
sustainability, due to its broad range of ecosystems and scope of food chain. Likewise,
these organisms are crucial to maintaining the balance of many ecosystems by
providing various ecological services (Tanalgo, et al., 2015). Birds for instance, are
ideal study group for the valuation of ecosystem services (Wenny et al. 2011) since
most of the birds are important in plant reproduction through their services as
Impact Assessment – Land Environment 239
pollinators or seed dispersers. Same with other native organisms, birds help maintain
sustainable population levels of their prey and predator species and, after death,
provide food for scavengers and decomposers. One advantage of studying fauna
and its attribution in the local bioecological characteristics of an area and may
provide sufficient data to allow a complete identification, prediction and evaluation
of potential impacts of proposed developments upon fauna and even the ecosystem
that hosts it (Moreno, undated).
The terrestrial fauna survey was focused on the terrestrial vertebrate groups of
Philippine wildlife; birds, mammals, amphibians and reptiles (herpetofauna) using
transect survey, responsible animal capture through mist nets and trap, and Focus
Group Discussion for the ethnobiological survey in addition to key informant interviews.
Standard field methods and procedures adapted from BMB Technical Bulletin No.
2019-04 were used for each taxa during the survey.
All fauna surveys were carried out early morning (0530-0900 HH) and late in the
afternoon (1500-1700 HH) for three consecutive days. A digital camera with high
optical zoom (50x), a recorder and a field guide to Philippine Birds were used for
verification of specimens. All photos in this Fauna Survey Report were taken by the EIA
Consultant For. Wency P. Hintural for the JLRCAI EPRMP 2021-2022.
The ethnobiological Focus Group Discussion (FGD) was conducted on March 8, 2021,
at Barangay Hall of Cogon, with local residents and key informants from the Barangay
LGU to obtain more information on known wildlife and validate survey findings. Photo
documentation of observed wildlife was also undertaken for further species
verification when necessary.
Biodiversity indices such as the Shannon Diversity (H’), Pielou’s Evenness (E),
Species Dominance (C) as discussed in Section 2.17.2.1.1.4 are computed for values
Plate 2.1. 5
Pied bushchat
Brown shrike
Barn swallow
Philippine pied fantail
Lesser coucal
Greater coucal
Philippine bulbul
Red Junglefowl
Black Naped Oriole
Brahminy Kite
Golden Headed Cisticola
Tawny Grassbird
Figure 2.1-42 Graph of Bird Species Density
Zebra dove
White-breasted woodswallow
Asian Glossy Starling
Chestnut Munia
Left to right: Glossy swiftlet, red-keeled flowerpecker and Eurasian tree sparrow
Philippine Nightjar
246
Plate 2.1. 6 Various observed bird species in a 154-ha JLR quarry expansion project
site a) Philippine Night Jar, b) White-collared Kingfisher, c) Eurasian Tree Sparrow, d)
Red-keeled Flowerpecker, e) Long-tailed Shrike, f) Olive-backed Sunbird, g.
Brahminy Kite, h) Pied Bushchat, i) Yellow-vented Bulbul, j) Paddyfield Pipit, k) Barred
Rail, and l) Barn Swallow
Among the species observed, there were four species that were encountered in all
transects. These include the glossy swiftlet, red-keeled flowerpecker, Eurasian tree
sparrow and white-collared kingfisher. The presence of these species in all transects
implies dominance in the area. Co-dominant species based on occurrence per
transect were olive-backed sunbird, pied Bushchat, yellow-vented bulbul, brown
shrike, and barn swallow.
Studies show that bird counts and population density decline significantly in air and
noise polluted forests compared to non-polluted forest sites. It was also cited that air
pollution causes physiological and behavioral disturbance among bird species. Noise
pollution can cause physical damage to ears, stress responses, flight or flushing
responses, changes in foraging, and other behavioral reactions of birds in laboratory
conditions (Ortega 2012). In areas of high air pollution, birds have higher breathing
rate and are more exposed to open air where particles can penetrate deep into the
lungs of birds (Qin 2015). Considering that the area is quite disturbed due to mining
Table 2.1. 39 Comparison of Bird Species Composition & Density from 2004 EIS & 2021 Survey
No. Family Name No. Common Name 2004 2021
This situation is attributed to the relatively dense and heavy particulates by product of
basalt extraction and a quarry area relatively shielded by landform that hinders
significant dispersion of quarry-emitted particulates. The quarry activities were likewise
not very intensive the average daily operation to produce the target material volume.
JLR likewise implemented reforestation activities which re-established avian habitat
and company presence in the area controlled predation and harm to wildlife.
Table 2.1. 40 shows species distribution of avifauna in the area. Information on bird
species distribution could augment into best mitigation and environmental impact
framework which can be used as guiding principle in managing this group of
organisms. Table 2.1. 40 shows species distribution of all observed bird species based
on IUCN 2020-3. Of the total birds observed, about 22 species are extant (resident),
two species are extant (non-breeding), one species is migratory and five species are
endemic in the country. Bird endemicity is primarily determined by defined
geographical area. Endemic species exhibit a strong dependency on climatic
conditions affecting their limited distribution. Under such circumstances, changes in
Impact Assessment – Land Environment 250
climatic conditions may cause not only the extinction of local populations, but of
whole species (Peers et al. 2016).
Taking as reference the database provided by IUCN 2020-3 and in conformity with the
database of the Biodiversity Management Bureau (2014), endemic species observed
are Red-keeled flowerpecker, Philippine pied fantail, Philippine bulbul, Philippine
nightjar and Pygmy swiftlet (Plate 2.1. 6) However, comparing it with the Project 2004
EIS data, there is an increase of observed endemic species from 4 (2003 data) to 5
(2021 data) (see Table 2.1. 40). It is of interest to note that according to the Birdlife
International and Handbook of the Birds of the World (2016) 2010, Yellow-vented
Bulbul (Pycnonotus goiavier) is not endemic to the country but a resident (extant)
species.
On the other hand, one migratory species was observed in the site- the Barn swallow
(Hirundo rustica). H. rustica is the most pervasive species of swallow in the world. It is a
unique passerine bird with blue upperparts and a long, deeply forked tail. It is found
in Europe, Asia, Africa and the Americas.
Figure 2.1-43 Chart Showing Relative Count of Birds Based on Species Distribution
22
Table 2.1. 41 Comparison of Listed Endemic Bird Species From 2003 & 2021 JLR Area Assessment
The Philippine Night Jar and Philippine Pied Fantail (top left-right), Philippine Bulbul and
Pygmy Swiftlet (middle left-right) and Red-keeled Flowerpecker (bottom) were seen
during the survey.
Considering that the area is quite disturbed due to quarrying, Shannon Diversity
Index (H’) revealed that the level of diversity of birds is moderate (2.662) according to
Fernando, and Castillo (1996) has low diversity (see Table 2.1. 42). Composition and
vegetation structural components of the site and availability food affects bird diversity
(Tanalgo et al. 2015). Hence, habitat disturbances brought about by urbanization
which augment habitat loss and fragmentation could explain the low level of diversity
of bird in the area. The Evenness Index of 0.7825 indicates that the distribution of
avifauna in the site is very high. When an area is dominated by one or a few species
are said to have a low evenness while those that have a more even distribution of
species have high evenness. Likewise, areas with high species richness that are evenly
distributed are most diverse and areas with few species that are dominated by one
species are the least diverse. Species richness and abundance in each transect plot
were primarily the reason for very low/low value of Shannon index.
Comparing the 2004 EIS and 2021 assessment on biodiversity parameters,
Shannon Diversity Index (H’) suggests that there is an increase of diversity from 2.145
to 2.662 level (low to moderate level) based on Fernando Biodiversity Scale (1998).
This could be attributed to the composition and vegetation structural components of
the site since the site has different land cover such as shrublands, forest lands, and
wooded grasslands including the presence of creeks inside the project site. On the
other hand, the Evenness Index suggests that the area remained its high level of
species evenness from 2003 record. This implies that the number of individuals per
species conforms greatly to the possibility of having a single species that will dominate
the area.
It is of interest to note that every bird species observed in the area are neither listed in
the Appendix of the CITES of Wild Fauna nor in DAO 2019-09 and IUCN 3.1 (2020). Both
standards suggested that all observed species were listed as Least Concern (LC) (see
Table 2.1. 43).
As to the global population trends as per IUCN Red List 2020-3, majority (43.33%) of the
observed bird species were declining including the endemic pygmy swiftlet. Other
species include white-collared kingfisher, glossy swiftlet, pygmy swiftlet, barn swallow,
brown shrike, long-tailed shrike, Eurasian tree sparrow, Brahminy kite and red
junglefowl. Such population trend is thought to be decreasing as a result of conversion
Table 2.1. 43 Conservation Status & Population Trends of Observed Bird Species On-Site
Conservation Status
No. Common Name Population Trends
2014 CITES DAO 2019-09 IUCN 3.1 2020-3
For the survey area, there were a total of 8 (eight) feeding guild types identified
among the avifauna species recorded. These are carnivores, frugivore, frugivore-
insectivore, frugivore-nectarivore-granivore, granivore, insectivore, insectivore-
nectarivore-frugivore and omnivore. Studies have also shown that among birds,
changes in edge and habitat area affects bird diversity. Also, area sensitive avifauna
and small patches of remnant native forest only support a small number of forest birds
(Loyn et al., 2010). Likely to be affected are specialist species which have a limited
capacity in terms of feeding guild. Loss of their habitat i.e., food source will result to
lesser structural support which may not be able to sustain a variety of birds and other
wildlife species’ niche. A study by Hernandez (2008) revealed that deforestation and
more importantly, land-cover change decreases the possible spatial distribution of
endemic bird species because of reduced habitat area and prevalence of
competitors and parasites.
Majority of the birds observed in the area belonged to insectivore group (12 species)
followed by omnivore and granivore species with 4 species each. Insectivore species
include barn swallow, brown shrike, glossy swiftlet, golden-headed cisticola, long-
tailed shrike, Philippine nightjar, Philippine pied fantail, pied Bushchat, pygmy swiftlet,
striated grassbird, tawny grassbird and white-breasted Woodswallow. Noteworthy,
that out of these species two are endemic- the Philippine nightjar and Philippine pied
fantail. Such findings could be explained by existing land-use and the presence of
creeks wherein insects are thriving. Dominating bird species in the area are those
whose feeding guilds/diet are favored with wide distribution of available forage
materials (Zakaria et al. 2009). Specific details on the diversity feeding guilds of birds
can be observed in the table below.
Insectivore-
5 Nectarivore- 1 Olive-backed Sunbird
Frugivore
Frugivore,
6 2 Asian Glossy Starling, Philippine Bulbul
Insectivore
Frugivore,
7 Nectarivore, 1 Yellow-vented Bulbul
Granivore
Mist netting, cage trapping and ethnobiological accounting for bats and
rodents in the area were conducted. Sampling for Murids (rats and mice) were done
using live traps with roasted coconut and peanut butter as bait. Traps were set in
locations where the mammals are suspected to pass through such as near ground
holes, fallen logs and thick litter fall. On the other hand, mist nets were set up every
transect to assess the biodiversity of bats and nocturnal birds (see Plate 2.1. 8 and
Plate 2.1. 9)
Photographs showing cage traps installed for non-volant mammals inside the project
expansion site of JLR. Captured specimens were gently released back after a brief
documentation.
Mist nets for volant mammals and nocturnal birds were set-up in each sampling site in
late afternoons.
These species group are highly seasonal and are sensitive to weather conditions
mainly because of their ectothermic conditions. To ensure that the survey will not be
underestimated, the team conducted the opportunistic sampling during early and
mid-morning where skinks and lizards are most active and during after dusk where
amphibians are out to breed, as well as other nocturnal reptiles which are active at
nighttime.
A total of six species of amphibians and reptiles have been noted with two (2) frogs,
and three (3) lizards and one (1) snake were noted through echolocation (sound
sampling) and ethnobiological accounts (see Table 2.1.43). Anuran (frog) species
belonging to two (2) families were also noted to occur in the area, such as the cane
toad (Rhinella marina) and Common Forest Frog (Platymantis dorsalis). These species
are sensitive to changes in habitat weather conditions and temperatures within 27–29
°C (Encyclopedia of Life). Rhinella marina is a known invasive and pest species which
prefers wet habitats overlapping with native species (Mayer et al., 2017). R. marina
and P. dorsalis were both classified as Least Concern as per IUCN 2020-3 and DAO
2019-09. These two species are known to occur in a variety of habitats including highly
disturbed areas.
Whereas, during avifauna assessment, a number of Tokay Gecko (Gekko gecko) were
heard. Tokay gecko is classified as resident species (extant) with an unknown global
population trend based on the updated IUCN Red List of Threatened Species (2020-
3) and was classified as Least Concern2 by the same standard. However, based on
DAO 2019-09, G. gecko was classified as OTS3 (Other Threatened Species). Based on
the EIS of a proposed QVPI Cebu marble and aggregates project, another species of
reptiles can be found in the City of Naga to include Parvoscincus steerei or the small
ground skink and Prasinohaema flavipes or the Common green tree skink. These two
species were classified as Least Concern as per IUCN 2020-3 and DAO 2019-09. Lastly,
a photograph of a dead Reticulated python (Malayopython reticulatus) inside the
JLR quarrying site was captured by one of the staff of JLR probably because of road
kills. M. reticulatus was classified as Least Concern by the IUCN (2020-3) and OTS (Other
Threatened Species) under DAO 2019-09. The species was confirmed by the 2004 EIS
study but was accounted only as ethnobiological description including the Malay
Monitor Lizard.
2Source: **DAO 2019-09 updated checklist (2011) pursuant to “Wildlife Resources Conservation and Protection Act 9147” defines the
different threatened categories as follows:
IUCN defines Least Concern as evaluated species not being a focus of species conservation. They do not qualify as threatened, near
threatened, or (before 2001) conservation dependent.
3 Other Threatened Species (OTS) - refers to a species or subspecies that is not critically endangered, endangered nor vulnerable but is
under threat from adverse factors, such as over collection, throughout its range and is likely to move to the vulnerable category in the near
future. This shall include varieties, formae or other intraspecific categories.
Impact Assessment – Land Environment 260
Table 2.1. 46 List of Herpetofauna (amphibians and reptiles) observed in the site
Conservation
Status
No. Family Name Common Name Scientific Name DAO IUCN
2019- 2021-
09 3
1 Gekkonidae Tokay gecko Gekko gecko OTS LC
2 Bufonidae Cane Toad Rhinella marina - LC
3 Boidae Reticulated Python Python reticulatus OTS LC
4 Ceratobatrachidae Common Forest Frog Platymantis dorsalis - LC
5 Scincidae Small ground skink Parvoscincus steerei - LC
6 Scincidae Common green tree skink Prasinohaema flavipes - LC
Impact assessment for terrestrial flora and fauna are combined hereunder, as impacts
on vegetation impact habitats and wildlife population.
Vegetation clearing will be required in the project extraction zones and for access
and haul roads construction. During the active mine life, the entire 150 hectares
applied expanded quarry area will be devoid of vegetation at one time or another.
Access roads, earth stockpile areas, settling ponds and the 17-hectares area required
for Crusher Line 2 operations will be generally devoid of vegetation during the active
mine life. Ornamental perimeter vegetation will be preserved and enriched, to help
buffer noise and filter dust.
Activities during site preparation will also bring damage to wooded grasslands,
shrubland and forest lands which serve as shelter and food for existing wildlife species.
Such activities can lead to loss of habitats particularly for birds, especially those which
are migratory. Unmanaged vegetation clearance may result in the disappearance
of some species which will not be able to withstand the increased disturbance and
threat from increased number of people and vehicles in the quarry, which create
increased potential of trampling over the wildlife and their habitats, increased blasting
frequency, vibration and noise. Quarry operations likewise generate increased
ambient dust which if uncontrolled, may heavily coat the leaves in nearby areas
sufficient to affect photosynthesis and reduce food availability for wildlife
Material extraction will also change surface soil quality, and waste/ topsoil stockpiles
if improperly managed may spread silt over non-quarry areas and affect soil quality
to allow the growth and proliferation of invasive flora, starving extant and thus
permanently impair the local ecosystem. Supporting to the observation of Kummer et
al. (1994) on the causes of environmental degradation in Cebu, siltation in Cebu is
due to natural erosion as a result of its terrain and climate, agriculture (which can be
controlled by the local people) and non-agricultural activity. The proposed
development will possibly contribute significantly to the siltation or sedimentation in
the lowlands thus interventions are necessary to further degrade soil and water quality
downstream of the project site.
Two (2) threatened species, the Tokay gecko and Reticulated python found during
the 2021 survey are listed under the Philippine Red List (DAO 2019-09) and the Updated
national list as OTS (Other Threatened Species). Appropriate wildlife protection and
monitoring strategies need to be undertaken to ensure the Project does not threaten
the continued survival of its population.
Impact Assessment – Land Environment 262
2.1.7.9.2 Operations Phase
The effects during site preparation will increase or magnify during the operation
period, where continuing site preparation for the succeeding extraction area will
increase open land area. The project quarry process cycle wherein vegetation
clearing/ site preparation-extraction-rehabilitation will occur simultaneously in various
areas of the production area in a maximum of 20-hectare section at any single time,
the impacts of vegetation clearing phase will continue unless mitigated.
The JLRCAI activities under the National Greening Program (NGP) from 2016 to
2020 indicates they planted a total of 2,329 pcs of fruit trees in an area of
approximately 5.8 hectares at 5m x 5m spacing. These trees will provide shelter and
food for birds in the area, among others (see Table 2.1. 48). A comparison of
information on flora and fauna survey from 2003 and 2021 indicate an increase in tree
species and population (Table 2.1. 36). Reviewing Table 2.1. 28, it is noted that the
variety of ground cover species has reduced. Nonetheless, the number of avian
species and population in the area (Table 2.1.41) has increased, with insectivores
being the most populous. The reduction in ground cover species has not affected the
insect population available for the insectivores. The restoration of diversity in ground
cover species will contribute to increasing the avian species diversity ideal to support
the planned ecotourism development planned for the post-quarry area rehabilitation
strategy.
During Project site preparations for the construction of Crusher Line 2 and the material
conveyor system from Quarry to Crusher Line 1, the threat to existence and loss of
important local flora species exists, as there are two (2) Vulnerable and Near
Threatened flora species in the proposed quarry area in North/South Quarry section,
and there are Vulnerable avian species that forage in the area,
During this phase road kills may potentially occur. It would appear from the
comparison of fauna biodiversity indices (2003 and 2021) that the local wildlife has
increased in diversity and population count and may have adapted to the disturbed
quarry environment. However, there are cases where fauna may be confused due to
sudden noise from backhoe, truck or blasting, and springs to flee for cover but crosses
an open road where a careening vehicle runs over the animal.
During quarry operations phase, flora and fauna species in the project area will or
may be exposed to increased influence of various environmental stressors generated
by the project. The following factors may threaten individual and species survival:
The flora and fauna species in the area are not exclusive to the project site, these exist
in areas outside of the production area and the MPSA. The proximity of the Mt. Naupa
Eco-Reserve provides accessible sanctuary for wildlife that will seek to migrate from
the disturbed quarry area. Mt. Naupa is endowed with a wide range of foraging and
food sources but as its vegetation is sparse in some portions such as in the Transect
No. 5 area, critical competition for food sources of converging wildlife population may
be averted by enhancing the flora community in Mt. Naupa with focus on species
that provide robust shelter and food (see Table 2.1. 44).
The end of life of MPSA 194-2004-VII is on May 2, 2029, and the remaining operating
years for this ECC amendment only about eight (8) years and application for MPSA
renewal will be filed sufficiently early, with the hopes that operations will have minimal
downtime. While in the interregnum, portions of the North and South Quarry which are
subject of this EIA will be under “Progressive Rehabilitation,’ vegetation with shrubs
and bushes to forestall wind-and-water borne erosion.
From Table 2.1. 44 (Feeding Guilds), we can see that almost all feeding requirements
of the avian species in the area, including murids and rodent population will be
available from (a) the existing NGP plantation of JLRCAI, (b) from the shrubs and
bushes that will serve as soil cover of quarried area under progressive rehabilitation
and (c) from endemic and native tree species that will be planted in “mined-out”
areas five years hence, on the currently active 20-hectare quarry area.
Quarrying activities will result in the clearing of vegetation which may cause adverse
effects on the insects, wildlife or other organisms that depend on the vegetation as
habitat and food source. Results of the tree diversity assessment (Table 2.1. 30) reveal
that the project area has moderate biodiversity index value. Loss of habitat during site
preparations will result to a decrease in abundance and frequency of vegetation and
wildlife at the quarry site. Endemic and native species which may not be able to
withstand disturbances (e.g., increased vehicles and equipment, increased noise, loss
of food sources will be lost from the area).
During the operation phase, the sources of threat to abundance and frequency of
flora and fauna will increase.
During the abandonment and rehabilitation phase, endemic and native plant
species will be restored to the mined-out areas. The planned restoration of locally
important species and the plan for a self-sustaining mixed-use ecological park will
increase area forest cover (See Table 1.4 MPSA Land Use Distribution), habitat and
improve area biodiversity.
The amphibians and migratory bird (barn swallow) will be mostly affected during pre-
construction and construction phase. If the grassland is cleared, the area will dry up
and access routes will be closed to these taxa. This may result in the disappearance
Noise, blasting vibration and vehicular movement will significantly reduce. The open
and disturbed areas will be re-vegetated and wildlife will be free to traverse. The
proposed Final Mine Rehabilitation Plan which is an agri-eco-tourism park which will
include training of local tour guides to orient visitors on the protocols to protect wildlife,
will not be hindrance to wildlife access to various areas in the restored habitat.
Implement continuous
compensation planting
through reforestation,
bamboo plantation and
protection of non-production
✔ ✔ areas within MPSA, to
enhance habitats in
denuded areas
Implement progressive quarry
rehabilitation
Maintain areas planted under
NGP to provide transition
shelter and food
The MPSA 194-2004-VII is situated within the Naga City-Minglanilla watershed which
has a total area of 1,313.44 hectares (see Figure 2.2-2), of which 679.84 hectares
divided in four (4) watershed sub-catchments, have portions that fall within the MPSA
(Figure 2.2-3). The proposed quarry expansion area of 150 hectares sits mostly on two
(2) of the four sub-catchments, with Sub-catchment No. 1 draining toward Cabuan
Creek that merges with Naupa River which drains sub-catchment No. 2, before both
waterways drain in east-southeast direction (Figure 2.2.4) into Cogon River which is
named Cogon River as it enters the populated area near the JLR Line 1 crushing area.
The Cogon River shifts to the jurisdiction of Barangay Guindaruhan, Municipality of
Minglanilla at approximately 1,400 meters from the shore where it empties into the
Cebu Strait. In the jurisdiction of Guindaruhan, it is called the Guindaruhan River.
The limited watershed structure is reflected in the relatively small waterways that are
expressed in the surface as streams and creeks, as these traverse within and exit the
Project site. The images of the waterways can be glimpsed from page 2.2-53 and
Annex 20. Figure 2.2-6 indicates the locations of these waterways.
A survey of the Cogon River would show that the waterway and its surface waters are
used by the local people for irrigation of adjacent agricultural farms (cash and
perennial corps), industrial water such as washing of small-scale gravel/sand
operations; cleaning of poultry farms; and receiving water for domestic waste-water
discharged from adjacent built-up areas. It is therefore essential that an adequate
amount of flow is maintained in the river to meet these beneficial uses for local
communities, as well as riparian flow enough to support environmental processes.
During site development, water will be required for both the site development
activities as well as the continued operations of the existing facilities. These water
requirements are estimated at 417,941 m3/yr. (or 34,849 m3/month) and involves the
following: haul road watering (65,700 m3/yr.); domestic use of personnel & staff (quarry
office, drilling contractor’s personnel, etc.) at 1,263 m3/yr., overhead water sprinkling
for conveyed materials at 250 m3/yr., Crusher #1 washing (325,793 m3/yr.), and nursery
operations (25,185 m3/yr.). The domestic needs of workers will include drinking, toilet
flashing, and minimal personal washing.). The peak number of staff will be 30 (Table
1.26), Annual Personnel Distribution by Component), with an annual water
requirement of 233 m3 or 0.75 m3/day (25 liters/person/day). The estimated rainwater
that can be collected in the sub-watershed is about 6,381,658 m3/.yr., and Project
water requirements is estimated at 417,941 m3/year. The additional water requirement
are domestic water needs of the residents of Barangay Cogon and Guindaruhan
estimated at 38,936 m3/yr. and 31,965 m3/year, respectively. The total water demand
during the site development stage is about 488,842 m3/year. Losses to river seepage
(1,069,812 m3/yr.) and evaporation (424,948 m3/yr.). leaves the estimated surface
water below project withdrawal at 4,886,898 m3a. Watershed recharge less total
water demand leaves a surplus volume of 4,398,056 m3/yr., leaving about 4,398,056
m3 downstream and percolate to the aquifer, or flow to the towards the sea. Table
2.2.3 contains the water balance during the site development phase.
The Crusher Line 1 process water requirement during the dry and rainy seasons is at
417,941m3/month and 34,828 m3/month respectively. This water requirement is within
volume certified available by the National Water Resources Board (NWRB) of 16.33
li/second (42,327.36 m3/month) during the months of December to May (dry season)
and 31.54 li/sec (81,751.68 m3/month) during the months of June to November (rainy
season). Crusher 1 obtains water from impounded surface water in lower Cogon River.
In a previous related document (Annex 18), the JLRCAI was informed it can only draw
6,221 m3/yr. of ground water to provide the domestic needs of the Project personnel
and a portion of the host communities requirements. Annex 18 contains a
copy of the NWRB document. As required by existing regulations, the JLRCAI will
secure NWRB permit for the existing well in Crusher Line 1.
Project Site
Figure 2.2- 5 Micro-watershed Catchments and Surface Flow Directions within the Proposed Expanded Quarry
Matun-og
Creek
General
Area of
Project Site
The estimate of watershed recharge from rain was computed using the modified Soil
Moisture Balance formula below. Watershed, aquifer recharge and theoretical
available surface flow volume computation is given below in Table 2.2-3.
Qr = r*p*N*a
Table 2.2- 4 Estimation of Annual Ground Water Recharge Potential (Based on normal
precipitation)
1. WATERSHED RECHARGE
a: Rainfall
Annual Precipitation (R) (Table 2.3-1) (m/a) 1.56
Precipitation Coef. (p) 0.75
Infiltration Coef. (N) 0.8
Catchment Area (A) m2 (Table 2.2-1) 6,798,400.00
Watershed Recharge from rainfall m3 (Qr) 6,381,658.08
b. River Seepage
Annual Precipitation (R) m/a 1.5645
Infiltration coef. (i) 0.75
Infiltration Volume/unit length m^2/d (q) 1.173375
River length (m) (l) 6,244.79
Wet day per year d/a (t) 146
River Seepage (m3) (Qrv) 1,069,812.32
WATERSHED RECHARGE(m3) 4,886,898
The critical period of the site development phase would be during the month of April
when the rainfall at the site is at its minimum. Based on the PAGASA table of climatic
normals (1981 – 2010) indicate the lowest rainfall occur in April, recorded to be 48.1
mm, which may translate to watershed recharge in the sub-watershed hosting the
Project of about 196,201.82 m3 for the whole month of April. This can be harvested
from Cogon River and the well in Crusher 1. Water balance assessment (Table 2.2-5)
for the month of April was made to determine whether the Project competes with the
local community for its water requirement in the driest month of the year. Based on
the study for a period of 1 month operation during the critical month of April, if
theoretic volume losses to industrial water source such as river seepage (1,351.69 m3)
and evaporation (15,804.28 m3); haul road sprinkling (960 m3), Crusher 1 withdrawal
(20,240 m3), domestic water requirements of the workers in construction, site
development, and existing quarry operations (99 m3), quarry dust suppression (2,400
m3) and domestic requirements of the 2 host communities (Barangay Cogon and
Guindarohan) at 6,401.25 m3, the theoretic water balance is 148,696 m3 or 76% of the
average normal watershed recharge volume in April. table 2.2.5 contains the water
balance for 1 month project operations during the critical month of April.
Table 2.2- 5 1 Month Water Balance During Site Development at Critical Flow
Demand (m3) Supply (m3)
2 x haul road sprinkling on dry days 960 Recharge from Rainfall 196,201.82
Crusher 1 Process Water Withdrawal 20,240 River Seepage 1,351.69
Overhead sprinkling for conveyed materials 250.00 Potential Evaporation (8%) 15,804.28
Domestic supply, All Crew 99.00 Total Available Surface Water 179,046
Quarry dust suppression 2,400 Available Water Less Demand 30,350
Requirement of Nearby Residents 6,401.3
Requirement of Cogon Residents 3,491 River Surface Water Flow to
148,696
Requirement of Guindarohan Residents 2,911 the Sea
TOTAL DEMAND 30,350
Site development for Line 2 construction and development of the quarry lagoon may
span two (2) dry seasons only. A positive water balance is still expected. The Project
will minimize its water requirement in consideration of other undocumented water
requirements from the community. The Project will implement a) road dust suppression
or road sprinkling of 4km of unpaved section of the 6km-long haul road (Cogon-
Guindaruhan-Tungkop-Cebu South Road) at 2.5 liters per square meter, focusing only
on the 4-meter carriageway frequently disturbed by vehicle passage b) No new
planting at the nursery. By the dry season, plants nursed since June -July (wet season)
should have stabilized c) most if not all project staff are locally hired; d) River water
extraction by Crusher Line 1 is limited to 46% of the wash water requirement (1.17 liters
per cubic meter of processed sand and aggregates. Assumed at 50,000 m3 in April,
10% of the annual approved production volume). JLRCAI will continue its process
water recycling activities and will seek to enhance and expand its process water
During Operations Phase, only Crusher Line 1 will draw the significant amount of water
from the Cogon River, as Line 2 will be using the dry processing method. The expanded
Crusher Line 1 operations will withdraw about 325,793 m3 from the river, which is 17%
increased water volume over its requirements for 500,000 m3 existing aggregate
production level. Based on 2020 production data, an average of 1.7 liters of water is
used per cubic meter of washed aggregates. In 2020, JLR washed a total of 368,902
m3, 74% of authorized production, using a total of 434,186 m3, of which 200,310 m3
was drawn from Cogon River and 233,876 m3 was recycled from the settling ponds.
For the JLR aggregate washing, 46% of the average washing requirement is fresh river
water while 54% is recycled from the settling ponds. Table 2.2.6 contains the
comparison of water requirements for the existing and expanded quarry operations.
Table 2.2- 6 Comparison of Project Water Requirements for Existing and Expanded Operations
Source Water Requirement (max.) %
Activity
Existing Expanded Increase
Aggregate washing River 271,494 325,793 17%
Production (m3) 500,000 600,000 20%
Domestic supply (Installation of
Spring 1,263
Crusher Line 2)
Domestic Supply (Line 1 ) Well 953 1,000 49%
Road Dust Suppression Quarry
0 142,350
lagoons
Drilling Contractors Well/ Spring 171 411 58.4%
Hauling Contractors Well 171 411 58.4%
Road dust suppression is computed at 5 liters per square meter of unpaved road used
per day x 2 x per day x 219 dry days in Cebu for the Cogon-Guindarohan-Tungkop-
Cebu South Road currently used as haul road, being the shortest route to a main road,
and (Cebu) Climatic Normals (Table 2.3.1). The requirement for dust suppression
estimated at 142,350 m3 is expected to significantly reduce by 2024 when commercial
operations commence, in case the alternative haul road is not usable. With the
utilization of the alternative haul road that will exit to Talisay-Toledo road, Project dust
suppression of the Cogon-Guindarohan-Tungkop-Cebu South Road will not be
necessary when the Project does not use it. The water supply source for regular dust
suppression will be the quarry lagoons.
Table 2.2-7 contains the Annual Water Balance at full expanded Project operations.
Table 2.2-7 assumes watershed recharge only from the watershed catchment hosting
the MPSA (Table 2.2. ) and river seepage from the creeks and rivers draining these
catchment areas. The identified aquifer recharge point in Cogon River coincides with
potential aquifer intake points in the MGB Hydrogeologic Map. It is highly probable
there are other aquifer intake points in the project proximate areas that enable the
aquifer to support the requirements of the local population.
The critical period in the expanded operation phase would be during the month of
April when the rainfall in Cebu is at its minimum. Based on the PAGASA table of
normals (1981 – 2010), the average precipitation during the month of April is about
48.1 mm, which may translate to about 194,850 m3 watershed recharge from the sub-
catchment hosting the Project. When the quarry lagoon is available, it will supplement
water supply for Crusher Line 1 requirements. Table 2.2-8 contains the water balance
during the driest month of April.
Table 2.2- 8 Water Balance in Full Expanded Operations during Critical Flow period (April)
Volume Volume
DEMAND SUPPLY
(m3) (m3)
Water Requirements Watershed recharge 196,202
Haul road sprinkling 960 River Seepage 1,351.69
The development of the Project expansion area, its quarry operations and eventual
decommissioning/abandonment is expected to generate lose materials, some of
which may be wash away by surface water run-off caused by rain that fall into the
catchment areas that cover the Project site. Lose materials are generated by the
removal of vegetation, construction of haul roads, quarrying of materials, transport of
mined materials and crushing/sizing of materials. These fine materials that are not
properly stored, get washed away surface water into the natural waterways and/or
canal built within the project site.
Likewise, soil erosion is another source of sediments that get washed away by surface
water. Soil erosion normally occur in areas having sloping to steep gradients with
minimal to no vegetative cover. The higher is the gradient, the bigger is the eroded
soil per unit time. The type of vegetation and amount of ground it covers also affect
soil erosion, where trees with a wide network or roots can hold the soil more effectively
than smaller plants such as shrubs or grasses. Modifying the terrain such as in the case
of quarry operations can affect soil erosion. The more areas having steeper slope and
devoid of vegetation have higher erosion potential that may lead to siltation and
deterioration of surface water quality.
Impact Assessment – The Water 291
The higher amount of lose materials carried away by surface water, the higher is its
degree of contamination of waterways. The materials washed away by surface water
may contain organic matter, reactive compounds from fertilizers and pesticides
applied in the catchment areas, and inert materials which can affect the quality of
the surface water in terms of its physical, chemical and/or biological properties. Fine
sediments such as silt or clay can make water turbid or change its color, Organic
matter may have decaying compounds, pathogens such as bacteria and viruses that
can cause illness in human and domestic animals.
Similarly, there are 13 settling ponds strategically constructed along the drainage of 8
micro-watersheds having portions within the Project area. These water retention
structures are designed to contain a month’s normal surface water flow, as well as the
24 hours continues normal flow which transport sediments. In view of this, so long as in-
land silt control measures are installed (project settling ponds and lagoons) and
regular weekly desilting works are done in these silt detention ponds, then it is
expected that only negligible amounts of sediments will find their way into the natural
waterways outside of the Project expansion site. (please refer to Table 2.2-10,
assessment of soil loss vs. settling pond capacity). It will be noted that the settling
ponds will be able to handle on worst case scenario, soil erosion from 150 hectares
open quarry for 1 month. It will be noted that the quarry operations will be planned to
constrain land opening to 20 to 50 hectares at any single time, with 5 to 10 hectares
under site preparation, 10 to 30 hectares in active production and 5 to 10 hectares
under rehabilitation, as the case may be. It is safe to assume that in a single time; 40
hectares will be effectively bare including the existing 20-hectare quarry area that
may be under rehabilitation and new vegetation have not developed extensive root
systems to significantly control soil erosion.
The Project site preparation and quarry operations have high potential to contribute
to the riverbed aggradation / change in stream depth and subsequent expansion of
flood reach in such case when silt control is not effectively implemented in-land. Soil
erosion and siltation of waterways are natural processes that can be accelerated by
anthropogenic activities such as site development, quarrying, transport of mined
materials along unpaved haul roads if no adequate mitigation measures are in place.
Impact Assessment – The Water 293
Another undesirable adverse effects of the Project would be flash flooding resulting in
the reduction of the natural waterways’ water carrying capacity by reducing its depth
through siltation. Inundation may be further aggravated by the potential increased
normal rainfall in Cebu as per PAGASA Climate Change forecast (Table 2.3-10). As
may be observed from Table 2.2.14, the settling ponds as per mine plan design will be
capable of detaining 104% of 24 hrs. days highest daily normal rainfall volume. It will
be noted that there is sufficient settling pond capacity to contain normal quarry run-
off water within the production area and allow it to percolate underground for most
times of the year.
Likewise, in Table 2.2-10 below, a comparison is made among the average and
rainfall volume received per micro-watershed, the respective sediment yield,
capacity of planned settling ponds, estimated residence time of normal and storm
run-off volumes in respective settling ponds, to assess the storm drain overflow and
sediment contribution to public waterways particularly Cogon Creek.
The run-off volume in Table 2.2.10 is estimated using the Rational Method:
Qp = C * I * A
Where:
C= run-off coefficients, 0.75 for normal and 0.95 for peak rainfall (see
Annex 19, Run-off Coefficients)
I= Rainfall Intensity in meters per second:
The normal run-off volume is computed based on the annual normal
precipitation of 1,564.5 mm (Table 2.3.1, Climatic Normals) divided
by the number of days with rain (146)/24 hours/60 minutes/60
seconds divided by 1000 (converting mm to m) = 0.000124025
The model is intended to determine whether Project sediment discharge will impact
the marine ecosystem in Bohol / Cebu Sea and due to time and resource limitations,
the model used the result of one-time sediment sampling and estimated the mean
annual streamflow using streamflow coefficients from USGS report “Estimating Mean
Annual Streamflow of Rural Streams~”. The sediment yield analysis and discharges
from three sampling sites in Cabuan Creek, Naupa Creek and Matun-og Creek were
used as inputs to the HEC RAS model. Table 2.2-12 contain the sedimentation study
monitoring station location, while Figure 2.2-8 contain the location map of the
sampling stations. Table 2.2-13 on the other hand contain the results of the sieve
analysis.
Sections
with High
likelihood of
sedimentation
Sections
with Low
likelihood of
sedimentation
ections
Cogon
River
Upon executing an Unsteady Flow Modeling of the Project impact zones, the forecast
model show in the locations along the waterways where a high likelihood of
sedimentation is expected (Figure 2.2-9).
Due to the low discharge of the Cabuan and Naupa creeks, a steady stream of water
is unlikely and thus, sedimentation will occur in pulses instead of a continuous line,
which may be seen in the animated Sediment Transport Model4.
The areas highlighted are normally zones where the path of water encounters
“ponding” zones where relatively heavier sediments accumulate, while water flows
over somewhat unhindered.
It is noticeable that there are areas of high sedimentation within the Naupa creek &
the upper Cabuan Creek as highlighted with light blue color in Figure 2.2-9. These are
considered non-project impact as these points are upstream of the JLR quarry and it
is unlikely that these sediments are contributions of JLR quarry. Small scale quarries
were observed in these areas.
From the sediment transport model, and relating it with the result of laboratory analysis
for Total Suspended Solids taken in February 2021, it is observed that major sediment
4https://drive.google.com/file/d/1xtSXed2qqKVJ9gSIOxLn2v390WWCUQO5/view?us
p=sharing
In Figure 2.2-9, Areas that are dark blue are of no concern, these have TSS below Class
C Standard (DAO 2016-08). An animation of the hourly sediment transport behavior
may be viewed from the link in the footnote, with request for access.
During Site Preparation Phase, Quarry Operations Phase and Abandonment and
Decommissioning Phase, the waterways within the quarry area will be protected
through avoidance of vegetation clearing and bamboo planting within twenty (20)
meters at both sides flanking the waterways.
The land disturbance expected during (1) site preparation and (2) quarry operations,
and (3) open land areas in such as roads and areas subject to progressive
rehabilitation will be vulnerable to rain erosion and will contribute to run-off siltation
(see Table 2.2-14). It can be mentioned that the Project does not intend to modify the
existing creeks and river that traverse the project site. Changing the slope features,
land cover characteristic and surface run-off pattern and volume will result in
reduction of sediment and storm drain contribution to the waterways, reducing the
scouring potential of storm run-off water this reducing river bank erosion factors. The
reduced water volume in the natural drainage due to retention of storm drain within
the quarry settling ponds and lagoons will reduce the water volume that accumulates
in lower-lying areas downstream, also reducing the factors that contribute to bank
erosion.
As mentioned above, within the production area, buffer zones will be established 20m
on each side of the streams and creeks, as well as increased soil cover with bamboo
planting to stabilize the waterways. Moreover, contoured benches will be established
with invert elevation and contour canals at bench toes to collect run-off and
sediments to lessen the velocity of storm drain.
The risk of flash flood, further siltation and possible destruction of properties
downstream caused by flashflood may be reduced.
In addition, as may be observed in Table 2.2.11 and Table 2.2.14 , the Settling Ponds
are sized to contain the recorded maximum rainfall volume, therefore any sediments
Impact Assessment – The Water 298
that may be carried away by the surface run-off will be retained in these structures.
The Project PCO will have to ensure at least weekly desilting of the ponds in order that
it can function effectively. As a positive consequence, Project silt contribution to
Cogon River will be reduced, the rate of river bed aggradation will be reduced. River
bank erosion due to reduced soil moisture is not expected as other watershed
catchments upstream also drain to the Cebu Strait through the Cogon River.
Therefore, changes to the drainage morphology are not expected.
However, the watersheds around the Project site are sparsely vegetated and with
steep slopes and with estimated average soil loss remains of 26.21 mt per hectare of
grassland or disturbed soil. The project will contribute to the further reduction of
riverbed aggradation and potential reduction of aquifer intake capacity due to an
estimated large volume of sediment run-off from barren hills, by planting and
maintaining trees and/or other suitable types of vegetation, until these are stable
enough to survive on their own. The Project will consult and seek the cooperation of
local residents in these headwaters in the selection, planting and
protection/maintenance of the preferred type of vegetation. While the site is located
in government lands classified as forest lands, however, the local people do lay claim
to these areas regardless whether documents to support these are available or not.
To avoid possible confrontation, it may be prudent to get their cooperation rather
than confrontation.
Note:
PRODUCTION AREA = 150 HECTARES = 1,500,000 SQUARE METERS
Qp = C * I * A
where: Normal Peak
Qp = run-off rate, m3/sec
C = Runoff coefficient 0.75 0.95
I = Rainfall intensity, m/s (source: PAGASA) 2.9766E-06 7.66944E-05
A = Drainage area, ha.,
* Total of average daily and peak rainfall volume are received in 1.5 hours
Key informant interviews with the Barangay Captains of Barangay Cogon, Lanas and
Camp 8 confirm the information in Figure 2.2-7 Groundwater Availability Map. Springs
are the primary sources of domestic water in the upper areas of Barangays Cogon,
Lanas, and Camp 8, and the adjacent areas of Barangay Guindaruhan. There are no
wells used for domestic water sources within the quarry site. Majority of the population
of Barangays Cogon, Lanas and Camp 8 derive domestic water from springs,
attributable to the hydrogeologic character of the area (Please refer to Figure 2.2-7).
This is also similar to the situation declared in the JLR EIS 2004.
The JLR Project EIS dated 2004 indicate that the Proponent constructed a deep well
within the Crusher Line 1 compound in 1995. Table 2.2- 15 lists the wells and springs
providing domestic water supply in the four (4) barangays hosting MPSA 194-2004-VII,
none of which are in the Production Area or in the MPSA.
Table 2.2- 15 Wells and Springs in the Barangays Hosting MPSA 194-2004-VII
Owner Well No. National Reference No. Location
Naga
Government 217 5787.976.11346.780 Balirong, Lanas
Government 229 5780.341.11354.650 Visayan, Lanas
Government 315 5785.934.11357.090 Lanais well
Government 314 5779.168.11363.460 Okan, Lanas
Government 313 5780.203.11355.380 Visayan, Lanas
Government 312 5784.703.11355.960 Lanas
Cogon Springs 322 5820.986.11351.910 Cogon
Minglanilla
Bernardo Tapic 204 5832.129.11345.320 Cantao-an, Guindaruhan
Common 203 5830.907.11339.560 Cantao-an, Guindaruhan
Kutod 427 5844.629.11348.840 Guindaruhan
Kinamhanan 426 5839.675.11363.330 Guindaruhan
Government 425 5826.267.11348.950 Guindaruhan
Government 424 5840.451.11340.790 Guindaruhan
Macario Baclaan 423 5840.999.11340.740 Guindaruhan
Government 422 5830.165.11346.430 Guindaruhan
Candelaria Largo 421 5841.743.11339.190 Guindaruhan
Fidelina Tapic 420 5841.594.11339.490 Guindaruhan
Isabelo Canada 419 5841.393.11338.570 Guindaruhan
Bernardo Tapic 418 5841.538.11337.030 Guindaruhan
Pablo Lim 417 5828.615.11346.260 Guindaruhan
Alberta Saavedra 416 5828.594.11346.560 Guindaruhan
Avelino Saavedra 415 5828.767.11346.710 Guindaruhan
Source: University of San Carlos Water Resources Center
The proposed JLR aggregate material extraction project will not intersect with the
ground water resources of the area. Borehole investigations with maximum depth of
100m did not intercept water (see Figure 2.1-19). The quarry operations will stop at
lowest elevation of 125 meters above mean sea level. The average reduction of area
elevation is 73.3 meters (Table 2.1.7).
Aquifers along the Naga coastal area are fairly to less extensive and productive, with
low to moderate potential recharge exist downstream of the JLR Crusher Line 1
reportedly up to near the coastline (refer to Figure 2.2-7).
According to the hydrogeologic map from the Mines and Geosciences Bureau, the
Project site is not underlain by an aquifer. The minor creeks (intermittent Hagukaya
Creek) within the proposed expanded production area that drain toward Naupa
creek, the Cabuan creek and Cogon River, are aquifer intake points, where the run-
off water flow down to infiltrate the fractures along fault lines and seep further
downward toward aquifers at lower elevations (Figure 2.2-7). The creeks will be
protected during quarry operations through desisting from earthworks twenty (20)
meters both sides from creek edge, preservation or enrichment planting at the
riparian buffer zones in order to control silted water infiltration to the interstices and
aquifer intake points.
The proposed expanded quarry production area will be de-vegetated and ground
water infiltration values will decrease as the run-off velocity will increase and
correspondingly, soil erosion. Aquifer intake points near the production area (Cogon
river) may be clogged with waste soil, accumulated heavy run-off sediment load
which could be as thick as watered-down mud. Without proper sedimentation
control, the muddy water could greatly contribute to the clay which could cake and
choke the aquifer intake fissures, thus the ground water infiltration to the aquifer will
be greatly reduced. On the surface, ponding along the waterways could be
observed. The aquifer recharge volume that should be the contribution from
Production Area, will be diminished through evaporation from surface ponds that
develop.
The site preparation works is not expected to generate a significant impact to the
ground water resources since: a) the clearing operations will be limited to within the
production area and alignment of the new haul road, which will be conducted only
during the site preparation period; b) the Project host community are dependent on
surface spring water for their domestic needs and so any impact on the ground water
will not affect them; c) ground water maps indicate that the Project site does not yield
significant ground water due to the impermeable rocks underlying the site, and so
any alteration on its surface is not expected to affect any ground water resources;
and d) productive wells dug by the local government and private individuals are not
found in the Project area, and are not expected to be physically affected by Project
earthmoving activities.
Vegetation in the quarry area will be gradually removed and the soil laid bare. Run-
off sediment load is expected to be high. Run-off sedimentation needs to be
controlled at source, to minimize Production Area contribution to sediments and clay
The quarry operations is not expected to generate a significant impact to the ground
water resources since: a) the quarry operations will be limited to within the production
area, of which one fourth of the proposed expanded production area is already
cleared by the current quarry operations. Any adverse impact on water resources
could have been raised by the public as of scoping date but none was received; b)
the Project host community are dependent on spring water for their domestic needs;
c) the springs providing the host community’s domestic water supply are located
outside of the production area; d) ground water maps indicate that the Project site
does not yield significant ground water due to the fragmented underlying rocks, and
so any alteration on its surface is not expected to affect any ground water resources
below or downstream the project site; and e) productive wells dug by the local
government and private individuals are not found in the Project area, and are not
expected to be physically affected by Project earthmoving activities.
The current life of MPSA 194-2004-VII will end on July 23, 2029. The mine
decommissioning plan include the following activities that will contain sediment flows
to Cogon River:
While the abandonment and final decommissioning of the quarry would minimize the
sedimentation of the Cogon river, however its effect on the ground water resources
would be minimal. As earlier mentioned, the Project site has no aquifer and water
resources are tapped from springs originating from areas upstream and adjacent to
the site. The abandonment and d commissioning works of the Project is not expected
to cause any impact in as far as ground water resources is concerned.
There are no aquifers in the project quarry site, the fissures in the fault lines near the
project site are aquifer intake points (see Figure 2.2-7). Groundwater quality in the
aquifer may not be affected by the quarry activities as all surface run-off will be
retained in settling ponds and lagoons and allowed to percolate and trickle into the
aquifer intake points. It is for this reason that there are no deep wells within the quarry
site, the underlying rocks are fragmented. The local community tap springs outside of
the for their potable water supply. The Project operations also do not generate strong
water or chemical waste that could contaminate ground water.
One of the major impacts of resource extraction projects is its possible contribution of
sediments carried by surface run-off to surface waters and well sources of community
drinking water if these are found immediately downstream of the project site. This
project has a number of natural waterways traversing it that serves as impact
receptors, and there are two (2) spring sources (Cabuan Spring and Candatu Spring)
used where the local community draw drinking water (see Figure 2.2-11). To assess
performance of the environmental management plan implemented for the original
extraction project, a comparison of two baseline information was performed, which
covered the 2004 and current 2021 water quality study results. The following sections
will describe the results of the study as it relates to the performance of the mitigation
measures to protect the water quality of water ways traversing the project site.
Water quality baseline information was generated using water samples taken from
preselected sites in the year 2004 that were tested in government registered
laboratories for prescribed analytical parameters. This baseline information was
updated in 2021, however, 3 additional sampling sites were established to further
widen the scope of the data base. Table 2.2-17 contains the location of the sampling
sites, while Figure 2.2-11 also shows the location of the sampling sites for water quality,
as well as air and soil samples. The results of the water quality testing of 19 selected
The analytical parameters used, tested the physical, chemical and bacteriological
properties of surface water samples. Parameters for the physical properties of water
include among others: color, Oil & grease, TSS, temperature, surfactants; chemical
properties include pH, dissolved oxygen, biological oxygen demand, chemical
oxygen demand, phosphate, nitrate, ammonia, heavy metals (cadmium, chromium,
zinc, lead and chloride); and bacteriological properties such as fecal coliform.
A total of 8 surface water quality sampling locations was identified, and two nearest
spring sources. The sites include a) Site 1. Downstream of Matun-og creek; b) Site 2.
Upstream of Naupa creek; c) Site 3. Cabuan Creek (upstream of quarry); d) Site 4
Cabuan Creek (outfall of quarry silt pond); e) Site 5 (outfall of quarry silt trap); f) Site 6
. Downstream of Naupa creek; g) Site 7. Cogon River (upstream of Line 1) and h) Site
8. Cogon River (downstream of Line 1). The two spring sampling sites were for: Site 9.
Spring in Purok Cabuan, Barangay Cogon; and Site 10. Spring in Sitio Candatu,
Barangay Guindaruhan. Figure 2.2-11 contains the location map of the water quality
sampling sites, as well as those for air quality/noise and soil. Photographs of the water
quality sampling sites are found in Annex 20.
3 123° 43' 42.8300" E 10° 16' 46.6200" N Cabuan Creek (upstream of Quarry)
4 123° 44' 32.2895" E 10° 16' 30.2772" N Cabuan Creek (outfall of quarry silt pond)
5 123° 44' 39.6725" E 10° 16' 59.5202" N Cabuan Creek (outfall of quarry silt trap)
It can be noted that there are several residential areas found upstream or adjacent
to the sampling sites (please refer to Figure 2.2-12). Naupa creek with 2 sapling sites
(Station 2 & 6) and Cabuan creek with 3 sampling sites (Stations 3, 4 & 5) for example,
have residential clusters of Purok Cabuan (Barangay Cogon) situated in their
headwaters. Stations 7 and 8 on the other residential clusters that are located along
stretches of the Cogon River. The waterway also traverse a large built-up area in
Barangay Guindaruhan near and downstream of Line 1. These residential and
commercial areas greatly affect the quality of surface waters sampled with their
respective domestic effluents. This aspect will be discussed in later sections.
In general, the test results for majority of the analytical parameters (12 out of 19)
indicate an improvement in the water quality from the 2004 baseline to the latest 2021
test results. Critical parameters such as dissolved oxygen which is vital to the survival
of aquatic life residing on the tested natural waterways, have increased from the 2004
The water quality parameters analyzed for monitoring impacts from the Crusher
operations are based on DAO 2016-08, as follows:
Residential
clusters
upstream of
Cabuan Creek
Cabuan
Creek WQ
sampling
site # 3
Figure 2.2- 12 Residential clusters located upstream of water quality sampling sites.
Among the parameter that indicate some improvement in the water quality of
surface waters within the Project site is dissolved oxygen (DO). All sampling stations
have yielded a DO value of between 7.86 – 8.7 mg/l which is 2-4.7 mg/l more than the
2004 baseline data. The 2004 baseline data also indicates that the DO level is even
not compliant to the DENR Class C for beneficial use standard that stands at 5 mg/l.
At this latest concentration (7.86 – 8.7 mg/l), aquatic life can survive and carry out
their natural processes. This favorable condition can be brought about by the
modification by the Project of the existing terrain on which these creeks flow. These
modifications such as roughening of the terrain in many sections of the creeks, which
Impact Assessment – The Water 311
included the installation of several silt traps that had caused a cascading stream flow
thereby allowing more contact by the surface water with air resulting in the increase
of its dissolved oxygen concentration. Figure 2.2-10 provides the location of the silt
traps at the Cabuan creek that had helped caused the cascading of creek water
flows, while Figure 2.2-13 contains the graph indicating the DO concentration for the
samples taken in 2004 and 2021.
Whereas interviews with older residents from the adjacent residential areas had
mentioned that there were no fish found in these creeks before, which is a
confirmation of the low DO level which is not suitable for aquatic life. However, the
recent collection of aquatic resources at the surveyed creeks would be an indicator
of the improvement in at least the DO levels. More discussions on these biologic
indicators of surface water quality can be seen in subsequent sections.
The 5 days Biological Oxygen Demand or BOD5 is a popular indicator used to gauge
the organic pollution level of a body of water. It is a measure of how much dissolved
oxygen is required in 5 days to oxidize organic pollutants in water into a more stable
form. The more organic pollutants such as domestic wastewater in the creek water,
the higher is the BOD5. The baseline data would indicate an increase in the BOD5
levels in the water samples taken in 2021 as compared to those test results in 2004. The
4 stations found with BOD5 levels exceeding the 5 mg/l DENR Class C water standards,
are those that are near residential areas. Station 3 for example with a sample with a
BOD5 value of 56 mg/l is located nearest and downstream of the residential area in
Purok Cabuan (Barangay Cogon), while Station 4 with a BOD5 of 9 mg/l is found just
downstream of it (Station 3). Station 7 and 8 with BOD5 levels of 39 mg/l and 274 mg/l
of BOD5 respectively are found along the Cogon River, adjacent to a big built-up area
of Barangay Guindaruhan. Station 7 is located just upstream of Line 1 and also the
built up area at the opposite side of river, while Station 8 is found downstream of the
area (Line 1 and Barangay Guindaruhan). It may be presumed that wastewater
discarded from these human settlements are discharged into the river, which would
explain why the BOD5 values of Station 7 at 10 mg/l is lesser than the Station 8 which
is downstream the build-up area of Barangay Guindaruhan. The other sampling sites
have registered a low BOD5 concentration between <1 to 1 mg/l, since the level of
human activity upstream are minimal. Figure 2.2-13 contains the comparison of the
2005 and 2021 BOD5 baseline concentration graph
40
20
0
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 DENR STD
Water Quality Sampling Stations
Total Suspended Solids (TSS) is defined as the dry weight of suspended particles, that
are not dissolved in a sample of water and can be trapped by a filter that is analyzed
using a filtration apparatus (Wikipedia). The TSS particles size is greater than 2 microns,
and those smaller are classified Total Dissolved Solids. TSS is another parameter used
to measure the physical contamination of water especially for projects/activities
engaged in earthmoving or particle size reduction among others.
Comparison of the 2004 and 2021 water quality baseline information would indicate
a significant increase in the TSS concentration in the latest samples analyzed. Samples
from three stations far exceeded DENR Class C standards (80 mg/l), of which two
(Stations 4 and 5) are in the quarry site along the Cabuan creek and the third (Station
8) is at the Cogon River downstream Line 1. The TSS concentration at Station 4 is higher
at 1,298 mg/l than Station 5 at 1,035 mg/l since the former station is found upstream
of the latter and situation just below the siltation pond which first receives and partially
contains the silt load of the quarry; while Station 5 is situated downstream of the silt
trap that further removes sediments from the stream flow. This site (Station 5) is found
downstream of Station 4. There are other sedimentation ponds found downstream of
station 5.
The existing silt control measures at the Quarry are designed such that negligible
sediments reach the Line 1 at the Cogon River. Station 7 that measures the TSS
reaching the area has recorded a TSS concentration of 39 mg/l which would probably
come from the combined sediments from Matun-og creek (Station 1 – 32 mg/l) and
Naupa creek (Station 6 – 16 mg/l). However, after Line 1, the Cogon River would
have received additional TSS from Project operations such that concentration
measured immediately downstream at Station 8 yield a value of 571 mg/l which
exceeds the DENR Class C standard. Figure 2.2-14 contains the comparison of 2004
and 2021 TSS baseline information.
1000
800
600
400
200
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 DENR STD
Water Quality Sampling Stations
TSS2004 TSS2021
The parameters Phosphate, Ammonia (NH3N) and Nitrates (NO3N) had been grouped
together since these compounds are the raw materials in the manufacture of fertilizers
such as Ammonium Nitrate, as well as explosives like ANFO (Ammonium Nitrate and
Fuel Oil). The comparison of two parameter’s (Phosphate and Nitrate) baseline
information will reveal that there is a marked increase in the concentration of these
two compounds from the 2004 to 2021. Ammonia on the other only had 2021 baseline,
and all of the stations have samples with concentration that exceeded the DENR
Class C standard of 0.05 mg/l.
It can be noted that the concentration of Ammonia in Stations 3 and 4 (0.472 mg/l)
and Station 5 (0.116 mg/li) that are in the Quarry area exceeds the DENR Class C
standards (0.05 mg/l) and have relatively higher concentration than the rest of the
other stations. This observation is similar to that of Nitrates where Stations 4 and 5 have
concentration higher than the rest of the stations for Nitrates but are still within DENR
Class C standards (7 mg/l). This elevated Ammonia and Nitrate concentration can be
related to the use of ANFO as explosive to significantly weaken the portion of the
quarry that are scheduled for excavation. After blasting the area, heavy equipment
such as backhoe, front-end loaders, etc. can cut away the quarry materials and load
them into trucks and/or conveyor belt for transport to Line 1 for further size reduction
and marketing. Remnants of the explosives are washed away by surface run-off and
into the waterways. The Phosphate on the other hand also contributes to the
explosives; however, it primary use in the area appears to be for inorganic fertilizers
that are applied to upstream farms. The baseline would indicate that Station 2 and 6
along the Naupa creek has a relatively higher concentration of Phosphates, that
exceeds the DENR Class C water threshold of 0.5 mg/l. This condition may be due to
upstream application of phosphate fertilizer whose residual flow finds their way to the
Naupa creek and later into the Cogon River, where they are monitored in Stations 7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 DENR STD
Water Quality Sampling Stations
With the exception of copper, the other 4 other heavy metals (i.e., Chromium,
Cadmium, Zinc, and Lead) do not have a baseline information in 2004, and so the
baseline data comparison can only be done for this (Cu) parameter. Similar to the
observation in other parameters covered, there appears to be a marked increase in
the concentration of Copper in the 2021 water samples analyzed in the laboratory.
The concentration of the metal from samples taken from the quarry (Stations 3-5) are
relatively higher than those found in the Cogon River (Stations 7 and 8), and
exceeded the DENR Class C Water threshold of 0.02 mg/l. Since the Project is not
mining copper minerals, then this small amount detected in the water samples may
have come from trace amounts of the same mineral present in the aggregates being
quarried by the Project. Note that the nearest copper mine is about 4 km away to
the northwest.
Zinc and lead concentrations found in the water samples from 5 water quality
monitoring stations (stations 3, 4, 5, 7 and 8) all are compliant to the DENR Class C
Water standards of 2 mg/l and 0.05 mg/l respectively. Similar to the Cadmium
concentration in the water sample, the values obtained for zinc and lead are almost
uniform respectively. Zinc concentration are between 0.02 mg/l to 0.06 mg/l, while the
0.15
0.1
0.05
0
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 DENR STD
Water Quality Sampling Stations
Figure 2.2- 16 Comparison of Heavy Metals Baseline Information (2004 & 2021)
Oil and grease are generally oils, waxes and other petroleum products that are found
in water normally wastewater that if not removed can negatively affect the
aquatic/marine ecosystem. These types of pollutants many times are caused by
anthropogenic activities. A comparison of the 2004 and 2021 baseline for Oil and
grease would indicate a reduction in the concentration of this pollutant in the water
samples, all values of which complies with the DENR Class C Water threshold of 5 mg/l.
It can be noted that 6 out of 8 sampling sites in the 2021 baseline have the same
values of <1.54 mg/l, and only Station 3 that is Cabuan creek upstream of the quarry
and downstream of residential areas (Purok Cabuan) where a relatively higher
concentration of 2.87 mg/l was recorded which may have been caused by untreated
effluent from the residential areas outside the Project site. Table 2.2-18 contains the
comparison of oil & grease baseline (2004 and 2021), while Figure 2.2-17 has the graph
of the oil & grease baseline comparison; along with those of surfactants and phenols.
Surfactants are substances that can reduce the surface tension of water. Examples of
these compounds include bath and laundry soaps, shampoos and others. Possible
sources of surfactants are residential areas which would discharge these surfactants
used in their domestic activities along with their wastewater. A comparison of the 2004
and 2021 baseline for surfactants would show, that there is a significant reduction in
the concentration of the compound. Both the 2004 and 2021 concentration of the
chemical complies with the DENR Class C Waters standards. It can also be noted that
the values for the 2004 surfactant are the same at <0.1 mg/l; and similarly, the same
pattern can be seen in the 2021 concentration for all stations at <0.032 mg/l. Table
Impact Assessment – The Water 316
2.2-18 contains the comparison of baselines, while Figure 2.2-17 provides the graph of
the baseline comparisons.
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 DENR STD
Water Quality Sampling Stations
Figure 2.2- 17 Comparison of Oil & Grease, Surfactants and Phenols Baseline
Information (2004 & 2021)
Fecal coliform is a group of the total coliforms that are considered to be present
specifically in the gut and feces of warm-blooded animals. Because the origins of
fecal coliforms are more specific than the origins of the more general total coliform
group of bacteria, fecal coliforms are considered a more accurate indication of
animal or human waste rather than the total coliform.6
A review of the 2004 and 2021 baseline information would indicate that all of the
waterways analyzed are contaminated with fecal coliform to a level that far exceeds
the DENR Class C standards of 200 MPN/100 ml, with the exception of 1 station located
at the downstream portion of Naupa creek. Of concern are those stations located
just downstream or beside human settlements/built-up areas which registered the
highest fecal coliform concentration, notable Stations 3 (9.2X104 MPN/100ml) and
5 https://www.britanica.com/science/phenol
6 https://www.health.ny.gov/environment/water/drinking/docs/coliform-baceria-in-water
8000000
Number/100 ml
6000000
4000000
2000000
0
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 DENR STD
Water Quality Sampling Stations
EColi2004 EColi2021
Figure 2.2- 18 Comparison of Fecal Coliform Bacteria Baseline (2004 & 2021)
2.2.9.2.8 pH
The comparison of the 2004 and 2021 baseline would show a slight
improvement in the pH where the values are made closer to the neutral value of 7.
While the values are within the DENR Class C Waters standard, these can be further
characterized as slightly in the alkaline side. The 2004 baseline have pH values
between 8.5 to 9.2; while the 2021 pH values are between 8.02-8.61. Table 2.2-18
contains the comparison of 2004 and 2021 baseline.
7 https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/pH
Water Quality Baseline information was taken from water samples collected from 2
springs used to provide clean water for domestic use of 1 purok and 1 sitio that belong
to 2 separate Barangays that host the Project site. The samples were taken springs
located in Purok Cabuan, Barangay Cogon; and from Sitio Candatu, Barangay
Guindaruhan. Since there is no information as to the location of the water source from
where the 2004 baseline was taken, no comparison was made with that baseline from
the present 2021 baseline.
Of the 11 parameters used to analyze the 2021 baseline information, about 4 of these
do not comply with the DENR Class AA Water Standards. Class AA waters are normally
used for potable water supply, among others. These parameters where the samples
failed include Oil & Grease, BOD5, Phosphate and Fecal Coliform. The test results
would indicate that these water sources have are slightly polluted possibly from
residential areas upstream of the water source such as Purok Cabuan, or adjacent to
it as in the spring at sitio Candatu, Barangay Guindaruhan. What is alarming is the
presence of significant fecal coliform concentration in the domestic water supply,
which would indicate that sewage from nearby residential areas may have already
contaminated the source. If no nearby alternative potable water sources can be
found, then residents of upstream built-up areas should be encouraged to install
septic tanks per households; the water users downstream should be informed of the
situation and encouraged install water purifiers in their respective house. Table 2.2 19
contains the water quality baseline information for the sampling done in 2021.
Table 2.2- 19 Water Quality of Selected Springs used for Domestic Water Supply of Host
Barangays
Test Results DENR
Parameter Standards
Brgy Cogon, Brgy Guindaruhan,
(Class AA)
Purok Cabuan Sitio Candatu
Total Suspended Solids 25 <1.5 25
(mg/L)
Oil & Grease (mg/L) <1.54 2.1 <1.0
Dissolved Oxygen, mg/L 6.7 5.5 5
Biochemical Oxygen 3 1 1
Demand, mg/L
Chloride 5.59 8.85 250
Nitrate as NO3-N, mg/L 0.492 0.546 7
Reactive Phosphate as P, 0.279 0.587 <0.003
mg/L
Fecal Coliform <18 <18 <1.1
(MPN/100mL)
pH 7.11 7.06 6.5 – 8.5
Temperature ° C 23.0 20.3 26 - 30
True Color, CU <5 @ pH 7.0 5 @ Ph 7.95 5
The results of the 4 and a half years TSS monitoring by the MMT had indicated that
there had been exceedance to the DENR Class C standards of water samples taken
from the 3 monitoring stations during the last 3 years of operations, most of which are
from Silt pond #2 and silt trap #2; while the Matun-og confluence had only 3
exceedances of which 2 are during the initial 2 quarters in 2017 and 1 in the 2nd
quarter of 2020. Exceedances ranges from 81.67 mg/l in Silt pond #2 to 274 mg/l at
the Matun-og confluence (first quarter 2017). However, it can be noted that there are
a series of silt ponds (2 units) and silt traps (6 units) along the Cabuan creek, which are
good enough to reduce the TSS load such that the flow reaching the Matun-og creek
confluence, is mostly compliant to the DENR Class C standard. The TSS monitoring
results would also indicate an increase in quarry production that resulted in the non-
compliant test results to the DENR Class C standard, which eventually got put under
control by the series of silt ponds and traps installed as part of the Project’s EMP. Figure
2.2-10 shows the location of the 2 silt ponds and 6 silt traps along the Cabuan creek,
as well as the water quality sampling station sites. Table 2.2-20 contains details of the
4.5 years TSS monitoring results, while Figure 2.2-20 contains the graph of these results.
250
200
150
100
50
Monitoring Period
An ANOVA statistical analysis was performed on the Total Suspended Solids (TSS)
monthly monitoring test results from 2019 to 2021. In view of the available information,
only a single factor analysis was performed. Table 2.2-20 contains the monthly TSS
monitoring results. Using the statistic limit of 0.5 for significance of difference (F), and
probability of chance (P), any figure derived from the analysis above this figure is
considered high, while figures below 0.5 can be considered as low.
In general, it has been observed that the ANOVA statistical analysis for TSS
concentration in all 3 sampling station have the same results and that is, having a low
F and high P values. The high P results signifies a very high chance of randomness or
uncertainty of the data. Similarly, a low F indicate a low chance of a significant
variance between the data set. The TSS F and P values for Silt Pond #2 are 0.330301
and 0.722374 respectively; for Silt trap #2 it is 0.059084 and 0.942764 respectively, while
for the Matun-og confluence values are 0.12453 and 0.883559 respectively. Table 2.2-
22 provides the ANOVA analysis table for the TSS concentration monitored at Silt pond
#2, silt trap #2 and the Matun-og confluence.
Table 2.2- 21 Monthly Total Suspended Solids Monitoring Results (2019 – 2021)
Matun-og
Silt pond #2 Silt trap #2 Confluence
Monitorin 201 202 202 201 202 202 201 202 202
g Month 9 0 1 9 0 1 9 0 1
January 82 46 84 99 64 158 43 42 74
35.
62 36 33 6 42 43 2 42
February 5
12. 13.
ND 257 ND 152 105 ND 90
March 2 6
ANOVA
(Analysis of Variance)
Source of
Variation SS df MS F P-value F crit
Between Groups 259.2083 2 129.6042 0.12453 0.883559 3.4668
Within Groups 21855.75 21 1040.75
Total 22114.96 23
The Project will be deploying personnel of difference fields during the 9 years of its life.
These officers and staff will be assigned to various areas such as quarry development,
quarry production, crushing plant construction, crushing plant operations. Their
number will range from 123 at the start to 232 at the abandonment phase. From an
average number of personnel of 200, about 75 (37.5%) will stay in the staff facilities,
while 125 (62.5%) will leave out. Those locally hired personnel will most probably be
living out in their respective homes. During the site development phase, about 123 –
163 personnel will be hired; while the quarry operations phase will have from 223 – 232
persons employed. Table 2.2-23 contains the schedule of personnel deployment in
the Project and their respective assignments.
In the course of carrying out their respective tasks, the Project personnel will be
generating domestic wastewater that needs to be properly collected, treated and
disposed of safely to the natural waterways. It is estimated that the wastewater
Impact Assessment – The Water 324
produced by the 75 live in and 125 live out personnel amounts to a total of 23,648 liters
per day at 14,198 liters and 9,450 liters respectively. In addition, kitchen waste and
garbage are estimated at 4,540 liters and 2,280 liters respectively. These estimates are
based on the unit rate of 189.3 l/day and 75.6 l/day domestic wastewater generated
by live-in and live-out (day workers). Kitchen waste unit rate is at 22.7 l/day/person.
During the demobilization phase, the expanded quarry site that had been fully
rehabilitated by the Project, will be returned to the Philippine government. The final
mine-out plan contains features that can be used as an eco-tourism site by the local
government. The existing sanitary toilets and desludged septic tanks will be a support
facility for such land-use. The concerned LGU will have to agree on this mine-out
plan, commit to managing the site including provision of personnel and financial
resources for its upkeep, after the Proponent has demobilized from the site.
A. QUARRY DEVELOPMENT
1. Road Opening 10 20 10 10 5 5 5 5 5
2. Waste Stripping 10 10 10 10 4 4 4 4 4
Sub-Total 20 30 20 20 9 9 9 9 9
B. QUARRY PRODUCTION
1. North Quarry 72 72 72 74 76 78 80 83 85
2. South Quarry 40 74 76 78 80 83 85
2. Conveying System - 10 20
3. Office/Motor pool - - 10
Sub-Total - 30 60 - - - - - -
1. Line 1 31 31 31 28 28 28 28 28 28
2. Line 2 0 0 0 25 25 25 25 25 25
Sub-Total 31 31 31 53 53 53 53 53 53
E. TOTAL MANPOWER 123 163 223 221 214 218 222 228 232
River ecology assessment was conducted in five stations along the three creek
systems (Cabuan Creek, Naupa creek, Matun-og creek) nearby and within the vicinity
of Brgy. Cogon and Lanas, City of Naga, Cebu last February 10, 2021 (see Figure 2.2-
11). The objective of the freshwater ecology baseline study is to determine the
presence of important aquatic biota in the Cabuan Creek and two other creeks that
run through potential impact areas of the proposed quarry project. The assessment
was focused on determining macroinvertebrates community structure, presence of
fish biota, and fisheries resources and practices that can be susceptible to the
operation of the quarry. In this assessment, plankton was not included because
previous surveys reported the absence of any aquatic life in the river.
Basic observation of the river in five stations were noted and the locations of which
are indicated in Table 2.2-24 . Two of the stations were located at the upstream and
downstream sections of the Cabuan Creek relative to the project site, two in the
downstream and upstream sections in the Naupa Creek, and one in Matun-og creek.
Stations 3 and 4 are located at the main body of the Cabuan Creek while stations 1,
4, 5 are points sampled along the creeks. Station 1 and 2 are located in Naupa Creek
while station 5 is located in the downstream of Matun-og creek. Stations 2, 3 and 4
are the closest to the project site.
Upstream of
Cabuan
creek, near
RVR3 10.283385° 123.744258° (upstream) of
the on-going
quarry
operation
Downstream
of Cabuan
RVR4 10.278611° 123.750278°
creek, very
turbid water
Downstream
of Matun-og
creek. Water
slightly turbid.
Locals
RVR5 10.279444° 123.750833°
collecting
sacks of sand
and rocks
were
observed.
Water samples were collected in five stations within in Cabuan Creek, Naupa creek,
Matun-og creek) representing different water elevations. Since water depth of the
creeks were shallow, scooping method was employed. A total of 30L of water were
scooped and filtered through a 20 µm plankton net. Samples were then then be
preserved with Lugol’s solution, while samples of zooplankton were fixed with 10%
formalin immediately after collection. For phytoplankton samples, a 1ml aliquot
subsample was placed in a Sedgewick-Rafter cell counter and examined under a
Nikon Alphaphot II YS2 microscope. For zooplankton samples, a 2-3 ml aliquot
subsample was placed in a petri dish with grids and examined under a microscope.
Phytoplankton was counted and identified to the lowest taxonomic level (genera)
possible using the references of Yamaji (1982), Umali and Cuvin (1988) and Newell and
Newell (1982). Zooplankton was identified to major groups using Yamaji (1982), Todd
and Laverack (1991) and Boltovsky (1999). The abundance of each phytoplankton
and zooplankton groups were expressed as cells/m3 and individuals/m3 respectively.
Phytoplankton encompassed all microscopic algae which drift with currents or float
on water surface of an ocean, rivers, lakes and other water bodies. They play a major
role as the basis of the aquatic food web, providing essential ecological function of
all aquatic life. The many kind of phytoplankton are classified into many different
classes, families, genera and species of both marine and freshwater. They have rapid
response to environmental changes, and hence their occurrence, species
composition and diversity are widely used as biological indicator of the quality of the
water conditions.
Diatoms
75%
The mean phytoplankton abundance during this sampling was 18,177 cells/m3. In
terms of spatial distribution, the station located at the upstream area (station Ph1) of
the Naupa creek recorded the highest phytoplankton abundance and most number
of taxa with 1.5 x 106 cells/m3 and 15 genera respectively. Conversely, the lowest
phytoplankton abundance and richness was observed in both upstream and
downstream stations (Ph3) of Cabuan mainly due to highly silted waters. The diversity
index based on Shannon-Weiner was generally low with computed values ranging
from 0.59-2.01. Computed values above 3.0 indicate that the habitat structure is
stable and balanced, while values midway from 1.0 to 2.0 describe a threatened
condition. Furthermore, values lower than 1.0 indicates pollution and degradation of
habitat structure (Goncalves and Menezes, 2011); however, it should be noted that
the diversity index very rarely exceeds a 4.5 value. In addition, the computed index
of evenness was not so variable with computed value ranging from 0.53-2.01.
Figure 2.2-22 Total Phytoplankton Density and Richness in five Sampling Stations
2.2.10.3 Zooplankton
Analysis of water samples collected from five stations in three freshwater systems within
and nearby the proposed quarry project expansion revealed a total of 13
zooplankton groups belonging to Cladocera, Copepoda, Insecta, Mollusca,
Polychaeta and Rotifera. Zooplankton observed during this sampling was typical
groups/type found in freshwater environment. Generally, copepods were the most
dominant group accounting for 52% of the total abundance, followed by rotifer with
35%, insecta with 6%, cladocera with 4%. Other zooplankton taxa (Polychaete and
Mollusks) accounted for 3% of the total zooplankton count (Fig 4).
The total zooplankton abundance was 18,642 individuals/m3 from the five stations
combined. The most taxa rich site was observed in water samples collected from the
station located at the upstream and downstream area of station of Naupa creek with
7 each. The highest total density was also quantified from the same station (ZP1) with
7000 individuals/ m3 (Fig. 5). The most depauperate station was observed in the station
located at the downstream area (ZP3) of Cabuan Creek with just 1 zooplankton group
identified. At the upstream area, there was no zooplankton recorded. No fish larvae
and decapod larvae were observed during the sampling. Diversity based on Shannon
Wiener index was low (<2) with the highest value computed at the ZP2 with 1.60
(Table 2.2-26). The computed index of evenness among the five stations was quite
similar with values ranging from 0.64-0.70 indicative of variable zooplankton
community. In this survey, most of the zooplankton are common types with no
endemic or rare groups encountered.
Rotifer
35%
Polychaete Copepoda
1% 52%
Mollusks
2%
Insecta
6%
8 8,000
Richness Abundance
7 7,000
6 6,000
5 5,000
4 4,000
3 3,000
2 2,000
1 1,000
0 0
ZP1 ZP2 ZP3 ZP4 ZP5 Mean
Naupa Creek Cabuan Creek Matun-og Creek
Figure 2.2- 24 Total Zooplankton Density and Taxa Richness In Five Sampling
Stations in three freshwater systems within and nearby the proposed quarry project
expansion in City of Naga, Cebu during the February 10, 2021 sampling
2.2.10.4 Macrobenthos
A total of forty seven (47) individuals belonging to nine (9) families or suborders were
identified from five sampling stations in three river systems (i.e., Cabuan Creek, Naupa
Creek, Matun-og Creek) located nearby the proposed expansion project in City of
Naga, Cebu during the February 10, 2021 survey. The macrobenthos recorded in this
survey belonged to three major phyla i.e., Chordata, Arthropoda, and Mollusca.
Among them, phylum Arthropoda was the most abundant accounting 55% of the
total macrofaunal community, followed by Mollusca with 40% and Chordata with 3%.
Arthropods dominated the macrobenthos community in station 1 of Naupa creek and
Impact Assessment – The Water 335
station 5 in Matun-og creek (Figure 2.2.23). Overall, the gastropod belonging to the
family Thiaridae (Melanoides tuberculata) was the most abundant macrobenthos
with a total count of 26 individuals (40% of the total composition). Melanoides
tuberculata is generally considered as a common organism thriving freshwater
habitat with domestic and agricultural waste. The most family rich phyla were
Arthropoda with seven (7) families while both other two phyla were only represented
by one family each. Among the arthropods, the crustacean belonging to the family
Atyidae (freshwater shrimp) was the most abundant with a total count of 8. Images of
common macrobenthos identified is shown in Photo 2.2-2.
100%
80%
% Compoosition
60%
Phylum Chordata
40%
Phylum Arthropoda
20% Phylum Mollusca
0%
Stn1 Stn2 Stn3 Stn4 Stn5
Naupa Creek Cabuan Creek Matun-og Creek
STATIONS
Category 2 – can exist in wide range of water quality conditions; generally found in
moderate water quality
Category 3 – can exist in wide range of water quality, highly tolerant to poor water
30
Category 1 Category 2 Category 3
25
No. of Individuals
20
15
10
0
Stn1 Stn2 Stn3 Stn4 Stn5
Naupa Creek Cabuan Creek Matun-og Creek
The Average Score Per Taxon (ASPT) based on Biological Monitoring Working party
(BMWP) was determined for the collected macroinvertebrates in the river system
(Table 2.2-27). The highest computed ASPT score was computed in Station 1 of Naupa
creek with 6 which is categorized as clean water (Table 2.2-27). The average score
for Matun-og creek is 5 which is indicative of a doubtful water quality while for Cabuan
creek, the ASPT score was 3 which could probably indicate severe pollution. However,
it is important to note that the number of macro-invertebrates observed is relatively
low and a monitoring system needs to be established to have a more conclusive
statement.
The three biodiversity indices - richness index, diversity index and evenness index gave
better information about the environmental conditions under which the organisms
lived than a consideration of the individual taxa alone. Taxa richness is the total
number of distinct taxa in a sample. It reflects the health of the community through
measurement of the variety of taxa present which generally increases with increasing
water quality (Plafkin et al., 1989). In terms of richness, the highest recorded number
of species was found in the upstream station of Naupa creek while no taxa have been
observed downstream sapling point in Cabuan creek. Taxa distribution was relatively
even with values of 0.7 and 1.00 respectively (Table 2.2-28.).
Diversity values in Cabuan creek was zero since there was only1 taxa was recorded.
The highest diversity index was computed in station 1 with 2.1. Shannon – Weiner Index
(H’) accounts for both abundance and evenness of the taxa present in a community.
It is expected to decrease with increasing disturbances (Plafkin et al, 1989).
Photo 2. 2- 4 Single species of fish (Guppy) seen in the Naupa Creek during the river
ecology survey
There are no species of fish and shellfish that can be employed as bio-indicators of
biotoxin pollution. Epibenthic fauna (macroinvertebrates or macrobenthos), on the
other hand, serve a number of ecosystem roles at various levels of the food chain,
ranging from consumers of plant material to prey for fish. Macro-invertebrates are
good integrators of environmental conditions over time and can be used as indicators
of heavy metal pollution, especially sessile, filter-feeding macro-invertebrates. In this
survey, presence of gastropod belonging to family Thiaridae (M. tuberculata) was
observed at high number in the downstream area of Naupa creek which indicates
influence of organic inputs. Ndifon and Ukoli (1989) reported that M. tuberculata was
most frequently encountered in water bodies polluted by high amounts of human and
animal excrements, as well as domestic sewage.
None of the species observed are endemic or threatened, based on the IUCN Red
List of Threatened Species 2019.
2.2.10.9 Threat to existence and/or loss of important local species and habitat
Sediments carried down from soil erosion and mountains moving due to construction-
related activities such as land clearing activities and stockpiles may end up as runoff
in Cabuan creek and nearby sections of Naupa and Matun-og creeks, especially
during storm and heavy rains. This may adversely cause water turbidity and stream
flow obstruction and affect the remaining macrobenthos fauna. Sediment erosion in
freshwater bodies can cause localized mortality of aquatic larval forms of bivalves
and gastropods, as well as impair nesting grounds of the freshwater shrimp. Siltation
may increase water turbidity, resulting in decreased light penetration and a decrease
in photosynthetic function of primary producers such as phytoplankton and benthic
algae.
In situ water ecological data obtained from the survey of the upstream and
downstream section of Cabuan creek located at the vicinity of the project site
suggest that except for the Naupa creek, the major creeks around the project site are
already unsuitable for survival of aquatic biota. Along this line it is important that
Activities during the abandonment phase may generate the same level of pollution
as during the Construction Phase. These impacts, however, are spatially limited,
time-bound, and avoidable.
The Project is located about seven and a half (7.5) kilometers from the shoreline. As
may be observed from the result of sediment transport model above using existing
sediment control method (by river trapping), the sediments do not reach the marine
environment. For the expanded quarry production, mine surface run-off will be
collected in-land through settling ponds which will not be allowed to discharge to
surface waterways. Discussion of oceanographic information and marine ecology is
deemed unnecessary.
The project site and its surrounding areas are characterized based on the:
• Meteorology/Climatology.
• Ambient air quality; and
• Ambient noise level
2.3.2 Meteorology/Climatology
2.3.2.1 General Climate
As with the rest of the Philippines, the two principal weather patterns dominating the
area are the northeast (Amihan) and southwest (Habagat) monsoon. The northeast
monsoon winds mostly emanate from the NE (northeast) and is characterized by
cooler and drier breezes with prolonged periods of successive cloudless days, as
compared to the southwest monsoon which arrive with West or southwest winds that
are responsible for bringing significant rainfall.
Based on the Modified Coronas Climate Classification, the project site in Naga, Cebu
falls under Type III classification, having no pronounced wet or dry season. The short
dry season persists from November to April, while the rainy season prevail from May to
October. Figure 2.3. 1 shows the project location indicated on the Philippine Climate
Map based on the Modified Coronas Classification.
Figure 2.3. 1 Climate Map of the Philippines Based on the Modified Coronas Classification
Type I Two pronounced season, dry from November to April and wet during the
rest of the year. Maximum rain period is from June to September
Type II No dry season with a very pronounced maximum rain period from
December to February. There is not a single dry month. Minimum monthly
rainfall occurs during the period from March to May
Type III No very pronounced maximum rain period with a dry season lasting from
one to three months, either during the period from December to February
or from March to May. This type resembles Type 1 since it has a short dry
season.
Type IV Rainfall is more or less evenly distributed throughout the year. This type
resembles Type II since there is no dry season.
2.3.3 Rainfall
The heaviest rainfall occurs in November, and the least volume, in April. The project
site has an average annual rainfall of 1,564.5 mm (from year 1980 to 2010) based on
the data obtained from the synoptic station in Mactan, Cebu. The highest average
monthly rainfall was recorded in October at 194.8 mm, with the highest amount
registered in November 1990 at 276.1 mm. The normal rainfall pattern in Cebu over a
span of 30 years is reflected in Figure 2.3. 2
2.3.4 Temperature
The recorded temperature mean temperature from the Mactan Synoptic Station
ranges from is 28.1 °C, while the normal range is between 23.9°C to 32.8°C. The
warmest temperature was noted on May 31, 2010 at 37°C, while the coldest occurred
on January 21, 1997 at 19.8°C.
VAPOR CLOUD
NO. DRY WET DEW RH MSLP
MONTH AMOUNT MAX MIN MEAN PRESS. DIR SPD AMT.
OF BULB BULB POINT (%) (mbs) TSTM LTNG
(mm) (°C) (°C) (°C) (mbs) (16pt) (mps) (okta)
RD (°C) (°C) (°C)
Source: PAGASA
Figure 2.3. 3 Normal Temperature Range in Cebu
HIGH DATE LOW DATE AMOUNT DATE SPD DIR DATE HIGH DATE LOW DATE
JAN 33.5 01-03-1988 19.8 01-21-1997 126.6 01-08-1999 30 NE 01-24-1975 1019.8 01-29-1998 995.3 01-24-1975
FEB 33.4 02-12-2011 20.0 02-16-2004 107.2 02-08-2012 22 E 02-18-1988 1019.8 02-01-1998 1003.8 02-18-2001
MAR 33.9 03-31-2004 20.0 03-02-2000 141.3 03-26-1982 25 SW 03-26-1982 1018.9 03-23-1998 996.0 03-26-1982
APR 35.6 04-15-1992 22.1 04-01-2003 174.0 04-04-1994 30 SW 04-04-1994 1018.1 04-05-1998 998.1 03-26-1982
MAY 37.0 05-31-2010 22.0 05-27-2007 106.0 05-27-2000 20 W 05-17-1987 1015.4 05-02-1998 1000.2 05-21-1976
JUN 36.4 06-07-2010 20.2 06-20-1997 88.0 06-05-2016 18 SW 06-25-1992 1016.5 06-07-1997 1000.5 06-29-2004
35.3 07-20-1973 20.8 07-05-1990 151.9 07-02-2016 20 SE 07-17-1998 1015.9 07-11-1979 997.9 07-03-2001
JUL
20 SW 07-05-2015
AUG 35.6 08-27-1998 21.1 08-19-1981 96.6 08-17-1982 25 SW 08-15-1986 1015.7 08-11-1997 1001.5 08-01-1986
SEP 35.6 09-05-2016 21.5 09-18-1972 127.0 09-26-1989 48 NE 09-02-1984 1017.5 09-22-2018 983.4 09-02-1984
OCT 34.4 10-22-1987 22.0 10-13-2009 166.1 10-28-1995 25 SW 10-28-1995 1016.8 10-05-1987 996.8 10-28-1995
33.8 11-02-1993 20.4 11-22-1998 276.1 11-12-1990 55 S 11-12-1990 1017.4 11-08-1997 971.1 11-12-1990
NOV
33.8 11-15-2019
DEC 34.0 12-01-2006 20.0 12-28-1996 185.4 12-05-2001 42 S 12-26-1993 1018.3 12-12-2002 995.1 12-26-1993
37.0 05-31-2010 19.8 01-21-1997 276.1 11-12-1990 55 S 11-12-1990 1019.8 01-29-1998 971.1 11-12-1990
ANNUAL
1019.8 02-01-1998
Period of
1972 - 2020 1972 - 2020 1972 - 2020 1972 - 2020
Record
60 55
48
50 42
40 30 30
22 25 25 25
30 20 18 20
20
10
0
July
January
June
February
March
May
August
October
November
April
September
December
NE E SW SW W SW SE SW NE SW S S
Source: PAGASA. Record Period: 1972 – 2020
Figure 2.3. 4 Historical Extreme Wind Speed by Month
Impact Assessment - Air Module 351
2.3.5 Relative Humidity
The area is humid, with an annual average of 81%. The relative humidity at project site
ranges from 77% in April and 83% in the months of October and November, and 84%
in December as reflected in the thirty-year climatological normal data from Mactan,
Cebu (Table 2.3. 1).
The dominant winds blowing 46.1% of the time from a northeasterly direction
(Amihan), at an average speed of 2.1 m/s to 3.6 m/s (Figure 2.3. 5). The light and
balmy Amihan winds prevail between October to May. Stronger winds (Habagat)
from the southwest direction blow 16.9% of the time, with wind speed ranging from 3.6
m/s to 5.7 m/s. The southwest monsoon prevails between the months of June to
September.
The monthly wind rose diagram of the area are in Annex 21.
352
Source: PAGASA Climate and Agrometeorological Data Section
Figure 2.3. 5 Annual Wind Rose Diagram (1995 to 2015)
The strongest tropical cyclone that hit the region was Typhoon Yolanda (International
name: Typhoon Haiyan) in 2013, with sustained strong wind speed of 315 km/hr.
Typhoon Yolanda made its first landfall at Guiuan, Eastern Samar and stroke a
devastating impact to the northern-most portion of Cebu. The area of the JLRCAI
quarry was barely affected.
The tropical heat in the region combined with increased relative humidity and
atmospheric instability generate thunderstorms. During summer, mature
thunderstorms cause rainfall for a brief period. The country is exposed to the inter-
tropical convergence zone (ITCZ), initiating cloudiness, rainfall, lighting, thunderstorm,
and moderate to fierce winds.
Figure 2.3. 7, a Typhoon Incidence Map from the project Mapping Philippine
Vulnerability to Environmental Disasters, a project of the Manila Observatory shows
that the Typhoon Risk status of Cebu is low.
355
2.3.9 Emission Inventory Scope 1
Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions are by-products of releasing energy by burning fuel.
The presence of Carbon monoxide (CO), on the other hand, depends on the
combustion efficiency of fuel and machinery. Any incomplete combustion increases
the CO released from machinery and gensets operation.
The emission inventory for particulates and Criteria Pollutants are carried-out using
emission factors from USEPA AP42 Compilation of Air Emission Factors and diesel fuel
consumption of equipment in Table 2.3. 4 and Table 2.3. 7. The AP42 documentation
of emission factors are in Annex 14.
Emission inventory is made for the following milestone years to observe the changes
in volume of pollutants generated in these milestones.
Year Milestone
2023 Production 700,000 cu.m./a or 1,400,000 MT/a, 130 MT ANFO Conveyor Transfer points
Source Activity PM30 PM10 PM2.5 VOC CO NOx SO2 CO2 (total PM) (PM10)
Haul Road Transport 42.61 15.48 1.53
Trucking 15.40 6.04 16.33 75.46 5.02 2,829.75
Processing (uncontrolled) 72.17 69.51 - 2.100 0.770
Processing (controlled) 2.52 1.54 - 0.098 0.032
Blasting - 4.42 1.04 1.30
TOTAL 60.53 17.02 1.53 6.04 16.33 75.46 5.02 2,829.75 2.20 0.80
2029 Production 2,000,000 cu.m./a or 4,000,000 MT/a, 374 MT ANFO Conveyor Transfer points
Source Activity PM30 PM10 PM2.5 VOC CO NOx SO2 CO2 (total PM) (PM10)
Haul Road Transport 121.75 44.22 4.36
Trucking 15.40 17.25 46.66 215.60 14.34 8,085.00
Processing (uncontrolled) 206.20 198.59 - 6.000 2.200
Processing (controlled) 20.28 9.84 - 0.280 0.092
Blasting - 12.73 3.00 3.74
TOTAL 157.43 54.07 4.36 17.25 46.66 215.60 14.34 8,085.00 6.28 2.29
Table 2.3. 5 Constants used for unpaved road dust emission estimate
SCC 3-05-025-07 Table 13.2.2-2 road emission constants
Industrial roads public roads
k 0.15 1.5 4.9 0.18 1.8 6
a 0.9 0.9 0.7 1 1 1
b 0.45 0.45 0.45
c 0.2 0.2 0.3
C 0.00036 0.00047 0.00047 0.00036 0.00047 0.00047
d 0.5 0.5 0.3
358
2.3.9.1.3 Diesel Fuel
Table 2.3. 6 Emission Factors for Uncontrolled Gasoline and Diesel Industrial Engines (English
units)
Pollutant Gasoline Fuel Diesel Fuel
(SCC 20200301, 20300301) (SCC 20200102. 20300101)
[grams/hp-hr] [Ib/MMBtu] [grams/hp- |lb/MMBtu|
(Power output) (Fuel input) hr] (power (Fuel input)
output)
Road Dust:
Unpaved Paved
Road (km) (km) Resuspended Road Dust (tons, annual)
Uncontrolled Controlled
Quarry to Crusher 0.1 0.9 pm 2.5 pm 10 pm 30 pm 2.5 pm 10 pm 30
Crusher to Cebu 0.13 1.31 5.15 0.18 1.81 4.98
1 5
South Road 3.08 30.76 120.68 0.99 10.0509 27.67026
total 7 3.21 32.07 125.83 1.17 11.86 32.65
Source code: SCC 3-05-025-04
Hauling intensity:
Blasting Emissions
91 MT of ANFO used
Road Dust:
Blasting:
130 MT of ANFO used
CO NOx CH4 SO2
4.42 1.04 0 1.3
Hauling intensity:
Blasting:
SCC 2-02-001-02
210 HP Dump Truck
Factors Results (tons)
VOC 1.12 17.25
CO 3.03 46.66
NOX 14.00 215.60
Total PM 1.00 15.40
SO2 0.93 14.34
CO2 525.00 8,085.00
Carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), and nitrous oxide (N2O) are the GHG’s
released in the combustion of fuels. Also released in the process are the GHG pre-
cursors carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen oxides (NOx), and non-methane volatile
organic compounds (NMVOC’s). Of these gases, the major gas emitted is CO2.
Assumptions:
Conversion factors:
1 joule = 1 watt-sec.
1 BTU = 1055.4 abs. joules
1 BTU = 251.9 calories
1 ton coal = 18,000 Megajoules (MJ) or 18 Gigajoules (GJ) or .018 Tera Joules (TJ)
TJ = Terajoules (1 TJ is 1,000,000,000,000 or 1 x 1012 joules)
Tons of fuel consumed = (25784 kwH/day) x (1 joule/watt-sec.) x (60min/1 hr)
x (60sec/1 min) x (1000 watts/ 1kw) x (1 BTU/1055.04 joules) x (1
lb./11,500 BTU) x (1 ton/2200 lbs)
= 3.4774 tons per day or 1077.994 tons per year sub-bituminous coal
h)
i) Energy consumption: 1,077 tons x .018 TJ=19.40389 TJ / year
CO2 Emissions (t CO2 ) = ∑ [fuel consumption (TJ) x carbon emission factor (t C/TJ) −
carbon stored (t C) x fraction of carbon oxidized x 44/12]
(kg/TJ)
C CO CO2 CH4 N2O NOx NMVOC 3
(kg/TJ)
2M 508.38 388.08 1,826.79 0.027 27.17 5,821.17 97.02 58.21
2004-
1,906.43 1,455.30 6,850.46 0.10 101.89 21,829.39 363.83
2021
2021-
18,111.04 13,825.35 65,079.39 0.96 967.93 207,379.18 3,456.34 2,073.73
2029
Project
20,017.46 15,280.65 71,929.86 1.06 1,069.82 229,208.57 3,820.16 2,292.02
Life
The estimated total global warming potential (GWP) of this project is 390,762.43 kilos
or 390.77 tons CO2é.
Greenhouse gases (GHGs) warm the Earth by absorbing energy and slowing the rate
at which the energy escapes to space. They act like a blanket insulating the Earth.
Different GHGs can have different effects on the Earth's warming. Two key features in
which these gases differ from each other are (i) their ability to absorb energy (their
"radiative efficiency"), and (ii) how long they stay in the atmosphere (also known as
their "lifetime").
The Global Warming Potential (GWP) values were developed by the IPCC to allow
comparisons of the global warming impacts of different gases. It is a measure of how
much energy the emissions of 1 ton of a gas will absorb over a given period of time,
relative to the emissions of 1 ton of carbon dioxide (CO2). CO2 is used as benchmark
and has a GWP of 1 regardless of the time period used. The higher the value of GWP,
is the number of times it warms the Earth over the capacity of CO2 over that time
period. CO2 remains in the climate system for a very long time. CO2 emissions cause
increases in atmospheric concentrations of CO2 by its “trapping function” that
compound for thousands of years.
The Project needs to offset the GHG by-products of its operation to avoid or minimize
contribution to the factors causing climate change. The Project is in a position to
generate carbon sink due to its location in lands under forest classification.
Fossil fuel burning (coal, oil, and natural gas) for energy consumption is the main
source of these emissions, with additional contributions from agriculture, deforestation,
and manufacturing.
DJF MAM JIA SON DJF MAM JIA SON DJF MAM JIA SON
Temperature 26.8 28.4 28.2 27.9 0.9 1.2 1.2 1.0 1.9 2.4 2.1 1.9
Rainfall mm
324 228 595 607.4 17.7 0.8 7.7 7.7 19.5 0.5 18.9 17.8
(%)
No. of Days w/ Temp. Max> 35C No. of Dry Days No. of Days with Rainfall >300mm
Extreme
25 1488 2463 7112 5720 6933 0 0 1
events
Source: PAGASA
Currently, only ten (10) natural-grown trees exist in the 150-hectare expanded quarry
area and 2,329 pcs of fruit trees planted by JLR under its participation in the National
Greening Program.
From Table 1.4 “MPSA Land Use,” a total of a little over one hundred thirty (130.26)
hectares or almost 84% of the 154.26 production area will be “newly opened” and
cleared of vegetation and subjected to quarry.
1. Densely or highly populated area that may be air quality impact receptor, in
position along the major wind directions of NorthEast and SouthWest.
2. Within 1000 meters from Quarry and Crushing Plant
3. Institutional or sensitive area such as a school
4. Location of complaint/s raised during consultations and Public Scoping
From the result of the air quality sampling of February 15-19, 2021, the air quality in the
Project Area Sensitive Receptor areas, was GOOD as of time of sampling in terms of
Particulates (TSP, PM10) and FAIR within the quarry site, based on the Air Quality Index
(Table 2.3. 15). Particulate emissions are the Project impact parameters. Except for the
(µg/Ncm)
Station 1 access road to crushing plant (where
103.0
dump trucks pass, about 30 meters 3.30 nil
0
from crushing plant)
Station 2 Sitio Bantoon, residential community
near the crushing plant (approximately
35.50 70.90 2.10 nil
100m SE direction outside of Crusher Line
1 premises)
Impact Assessment - The Air 371
No. Description PM10 TSP SO2 NO2
(µg/Ncm)
Station 3 vacant area within the vicinity
30.30 2.0 nil
(with no residents, far from access road
24-hr. standard 150 230 180 150
Source: JLR Project EIS 2003
A precise comparison of the 2004 baseline and current 2021 24-hour air quality data
is not possible due to lack of geographic coordinates or location map for the 2003 air
quality sampling. For a general comparison since the air quality sampling Station 2 in
2003 and Station A2 in 2021 are both within 50 meters of the Crushing Plant (Line 1)
and both are in residential areas, with the main difference being 2003 location was
along the Barangay road and the 2021 location was in a “back road” area, it is
observed that the level of particulates in 2021 is lower than 2004 level. This is
attributable to the low level of vehicle traffic passing Stn. A2. Diesel-fed engines emit
more SO2 than gasoline engines. The vehicles passing the volleyball court at Sto.
Bantoon are mostly JLR haul trucks.
SO2 and NO2 are not impact parameters of quarry and crushing plant operations per
se. These are gaseous emissions from vehicles that the Project use for material
transport. Carbon Monoxide (CO) in ambient air may have been dispersed by wind
from quarry blasting, and from vehicles passing the sampling locations. Below the
limits set by the National Ambient Air Quality Standards and Guideline Values. SOx
and CO do not pose a health risk in open spaces and well-ventilated areas, as these
are easily dispersed. These are however, monitored as these are precursor gasses that
interact with other gasses in the atmosphere to create Greenhouse Gas species.
(µg/Ncm)
Station 4 Quarry/Blasting
78.10 116.60 - -
site
Station 5 Crushing Site 93.00 182.6 6.85 93
DENR 1-hour Standard * 300 * *
*Not applicable for 1-hour averaging for baseline purposes.
ug/Ncm 250
200
147
150
86 88
100 75
Figure 2.3. 8 Graph of Monitored TSP Concentration at Crusher Line 1, 2013 to 2017
Annex 22 was provided by the Proponent, a Certification from MGB Region VII
Regional Director stating that JLR was unable to conduct air quality monitoring due
to inoperability of MGB air monitoring equipment.
Air quality monitoring for 2020 is likewise reported to have been suspended due to
pandemic impact, the EMB-accredited laboratories were sporadically closed due to
lock downs for disinfection.
JLR undertakes inhouse noise monitoring using a standard noise meter, at the Crushed
Sand surge pile and at the material hopper equipment in Line 1. The result of JLR
periodic noise monitoring is shown below. The Crusher Line 1 operates from 7:00 am
to 6:00 pm.
50
40
30
20
10
0
0555H/Morning 1050H/Daytime 2015H/Evening 2335H/Nighttime
Basketball Court Near Cabuan Elementary School NPCC Standard for Class AA Area
Figure 2.3. 9 2021 Noise Levels Captured near Cabuan Elementary School, Cogon,
Naga, Cebu (February 16 to 17, 2021)
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0545H/Morning 1420H/Daytime 1940H/Evening 0015H/Nighttime
Sitio Bantoon Near Volleyball Court NPCC Standard for Class A Area
Figure 2.3. 10 2021 Noise Levels Captured near Volleyball Court at Sitio
Bantoon, Cogon, Naga, Cebu (February 17 to 18, 2021)
As will be observed from noise readings from the Air Quality sampling station near
Cabuan Elementary and High School (Figure 2.3. 9), noise monitored over the twenty-
four hour period were all below the standard for Class AA – Institutional Area. There
were no classes during sampling. The school was closed due to Covid-19 pandemic.
The school is also a favorite congregation area by the locals. At the time of the
sampling, many low-key informal eating areas were observed, with relaxed
atmosphere and free-flowing balmy breeze providing more than a handful of people
with friendly smiles, venue to listen to music, talk and play board games. Light chatter
and laugher were background noise.
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0715H/Morning 1400H/Daytime 1925H/Evening 0145H/Nighttime
Quarry Area E110M Loading Area NPCC Standard for Class D Area
Figure 2.3. 11 2021 Noise Levels Captured at the JLRCAI Quarry Loading Area,
Cogon, Naga, Cebu (February 19, 2021)
The observed noise level at the quarry material loading area were within the limits
provided by the NPCC Memorandum Circular 002 Series of 1980.
The noise monitoring data provided for this report are all below the standard limits set
forth by NPCC MC 1978 Rules and Regulations of Noise in General Areas.
The points of interest where noise simulation exercise for the expanded production
were undertaken, and the location of the noise sources are as follows:
The noise emission from each equipment is computed using a mathematical model,
then the noise levels for the multiple operating equipment are compounded. The
formula used is:
The result of the noise attenuation exercise in Table 2.3. 20 assumes all equipment are
operating at the same time and blasting is undertaken. The project noise levels at the
point of perception of area sensitive receptors will exceed the prescribed maximum
noise levels as per the DENR NPCC 1978 Standards for Noise in General Areas
Classification.
Figures 2.3-14 to 16 show the uncontrolled worst case noise impact within 1km radius
of project sources.
This mathematical model has limitations, in that it assumes the noise receptor is
located on the same elevation as the noise source,, does not factor in the surrounding
vegetation that absorbs noise and does not factor in background noise. The major
noise source, blasting, occurs in a basinal land form and surrounding terrain and
vegetation will tend to hinder the noise dispersion, thus blasting noise perceived by
humans and fauna would tend to be lower than the forecast result from the
logarithmic model.
Basketball
Southwest Within
Far South Far North Sitio Test Test Court near
of Crusher 2 Line 1 Line 2 Simulated Blast
Community Community Bantoon Location Location Cabuan
community Site
Elementary
Forecast Noise Level
61.242 57.382 59.366 67.568 73.149 72.137 56.480 81.509 85.377 79.871
(composite) (dBA)
Reading of existing as
N/A N/A N/A 61 69 69 49 70 N/A N/A
tested
Theoretic dB from
91.99 88.41 94.02 92.32 90.83 91.91 41.10 102.32 158.29
Blasting
*Not perceivable due to
subsonic frequencies of *dB at blast site
1hz to 20hz
Theoretic vibration from
0.08 0.03 0.12 0.08 0.06 0.07 0.13 0.81 - 316,620.96
blasting (cm/sec)
*Safety limit is 20 cm/sec *Shockwave at
blast site
Maximum Allowable
A A A A D D AA D D D
Noise Levels dB(A)*
Morning (5 AM - 9 AM) 50 50 50 50 70 70 45 70 70 70
Daytime (9 AM - 6 PM) 55 55 55 55 75 75 50 75 75 75
Evening (6 PM-10 PM) 50 50 50 50 70 70 45 70 70 70
Nighttime (10 PM-5 AM) 45 45 45 45 65 65 40 65 65 65
The City of Naga is a third-class component city of Metro Cebu, with approximate
center at the coordinates 123 45’ 30”E longitude and 10 12’ 41”N latitude. The
distance between Cebu City and Naga City is approximately 21 kilometers,
traversable between 30 and 45 minutes by private or public vehicle respectively.
Naga City has a total land area of 10,217 hectares bounded from the North by
Minglanilla, in the south by San Fernando City, from the east by the Cebu Strait, and
in the west by Toledo City.
Forestlands account for 64% of Naga City land area, while Alienable and Disposable
lands account for only 35%, and a small portion (49 hectares or 0.5%) are mangrove
and coastal areas. (Table 2.4.1). Perennial crops and annual crops combined
account for 44% of the largest vegetative cover of Naga City, with 12% of annual
crops and 17% of perennial crops falling within forest lands.
Primary Impact
Zone
Figure 2.4- 3 Quarry North Road to Cabuan Elementary School to Camp 8 Connecting to Talisay-Toledo Road
Impact Assessment – The People 391
Impact Assessment – The People Figure 2.4- 4 Residential2.4-392
Clusters along the Cogon- Guindaruhan-Tungkop to Cebu South Road
Forestlands account for 64% of Naga City land area, while Alienable and Disposable
lands account for only 35%, and a small portion (49 hectares or 0.5%) are mangrove
and coastal areas. (Table 2.4.2). Perennial crops and annual crops combined
account for 44% of the largest vegetative cover of Naga City, with 12% of annual
crops and 17% of perennial crops falling within forest lands.
The city has 28 barangays, 11 of which are considered urban located along the
coastal areas, namely: South Poblacion, North Poblacion, East Poblacion, West
Poblacion, Central Poblacion, Inayagan, Colon, Tina-an, Inoburan, Tuyan, and
Langtad, while the remaining 17 barangays are considered rural located in the
mountainous areas namely: Tangke, Na-alad, Mainit, Jaguimit, Patag, Cantao-an,
Cogon, Uling, Balirong, Cabungahan, Bairan, Pangdan, Alpaco, Lutac, Tagjaguimit,
Lanas, and Mayana. The host barangay of the proposed expanded mineral
production area, Barangay Cogon accounts for 7.35% of City land area and 3.5% of
City population.
The largest portion (75%) of Minglanilla land area is rugged and mountainous with
severely eroded soils (Table 2.4- 4). Less than 2% of its land area has no soil limitation
with loamy soil profile, minimal erosion, and slight flooding. Slightly over a quintile of
the land area has very poor soil permeability and regularly subjected to severe
flooding and less than 1% has moderate land use limitation, given fine soil, none to
slight erosion potential but with periodic flooding (Table 2.4- 4).
Based on the 2020 census by the Philippine Statistics Office (PSO), the population
stood at 133,184, with average annual growth rate of 3% over the 115,750 population
in 2015. Figure 2.4- 5 reflects the Naga population growth from 1903 to 1995. A high
population growth rate was reflected in 1975 and in 2000 as more migrants settled in,
attracted by livelihood opportunities when large industries started operation in Naga.
The population of Barangay Cogon, Naga, as of 2020, was 4,654, with an annual
average population growth of 0.8%. over its 2015 population. Barangay Lanas
population was 3,270, having grown at an average annual rate of 2.6% from 2015.
According to the 2020 PSA census, based on the population growth rate, the
projected population of the city by 2025 is 144,016. In 2015, Naga had a total of 26,011
2040 4.00%
2020 3.50%
2000 3.00%
1980 2.50%
1960 2.00%
1940 1.50%
1920 1.00%
1900 0.50%
1880 0.00%
1860 -0.50%
1840 -1.00%
1903 1918 1939 1948 1960 1970 1975 1980 1990 1995 2000 2007 2010 2015 2020
Figure 2.4- 5 Population and Population Growth Rate of Naga, 1903 to 2020
According to the 2020 census from the Philippine Statistics Authority (PSA), the
Municipality of Minglanilla had a population of 151,002 persons, with an annual
average population growth of 2.9% over its population of 132,135 persons in 2015.
Figure 2.4- 6 shows the population growth of Minglanilla from 1903 to 2015. In
Guindaruhan, the population as of 2020 was 3,881, with 2.6% average annual growth
rate since 2015, while the population of Camp 8 was 2,294 persons, with average
annual growth of 3.48% over its population numbering 1,798 in 2015. Camp 8 is a
highland barangay with relatively good water supply source attributed to the
watersheds in the Central Cebu highlands. The low population density and low land
use competition are among the attractors of population growth in Barangay Camp
8.
The municipality had a total number of 30,127 households in 2015 (PSA) with an
average number of 4.39 persons per household.
4.50%
140,000
4.00%
120,000
3.50%
100,000
3.00%
80,000 2.50%
2.00%
60,000
1.50%
40,000
1.00%
20,000
0.50%
0 0.00%
1903 1918 1939 1948 1960 1970 1975 1980 1990 1995 2000 2007 2010 2015 2020
With the land area of 10,217 hectares and a 2020 population of 133,184 there were
13.04 persons per hectare in the City of Naga. Using PSA’s 2025 updated mid-year
projection based on 2015 census, Naga City’s population in 2025 may be around
144,016 persons and average population density by then is projected to be 14.10
persons per hectare.
The population density of Barangay Cogon was 6.2 while Barangay Lanas’ was 5.35
persons per hectare in 2020 (Table 2.4- 3).
Based on the land area of 4,898 hectares, the average municipal population density
of Minglanilla was 30.83 persons per hectare in 2020. The average population density
in Camp 8 and Guindaruhan as of 2020 were 3.48 and 4.43 respectively, much lower
than the Municipal average.
The only available statistics for household composition are based on the PSA 2015
Census of Population and Households. As more recent demographic data are made
available by official sources, these data will be updated by JLRCAI by appending
such data to in the EPRMP Annexes. There were more females than males in the City
of Naga with the ratio of 1.028 females to 1 male in 2015. The population is relatively
young with those less than 20 years old comprising of 46.45% of the total population in
2015. In the same year, the largest age group was in the bracket between 20 to 59
years old, composing of 45.79% of the total population. Those over 80 years old were
the smallest population group, constituting only 0.69% of the total population. (Table
2.4- 6)
In 2015, the gender ratio in the Municipality of Minglanilla was 1.043. The younger age
groups or those below 20 years old make up 41.22% of the total population. The
dominant age group was between 15 to 19 years old (10.90%) bracket while the least
is those aged 80 and above. (Table 2.4- 7)
As of 2021, there are two (2) elementary schools and two (2) high schools in Barangay
Cogon. These are Cogon Elementary, with 486 students enrolled; Cabuan Elementary,
with 150 students; Cogon High School, with 180 students; and Cabuan High School,
with 78 students enrolled. On the other hand, Barangay Lanas has one (1) elementary
school: Lanas Elementary, with 305 students; and one (1) high school: Lanas High
School, with 179 students.
The Philippine literacy rate in 2015 was placed at 96.3%, the Central Visayas was at
98.5%, and the Province of Cebu is 91.45 (Philippine Statistics Authority). The literacy
rate in the City of Naga was 79.67% as reported by its Community Based Monitoring
System (CBMS) (
Table 2.4- 8) for the same period. This figure is lower than the national, regional, and
provincial averages. Nevertheless, the trend of illiteracy in the city is decreasing.
Table 2.4- 8 Literacy Rate of Population 10+ Years Old in Naga, 2015
Male Female Both Sexes
No. Rate (%) No. Rate (%) No. Rate (%)
Literate 33,928 95.03 35,142 95.13 69,070 76.67
Illiterate 8,546 4.97 9,081 4.87 17,627 20.33
Total 42,474 49 44,223 51 86,697 100
Source: Community Based Monitoring System (CBMS) 2015, NSO 2015
The literacy rate in the Municipality of Minglanilla is relatively high at 99.43%, higher
than the Philippines, Central Visayas, and Province of Cebu’s averages:
Table 2.4- 9 Literacy Rate of Household Population 10+ Years Old in Minglanilla, 2015
Male Female Both Sexes
No. Rate (%) No. Rate (%) No. Rate (%)
Literate 51,110 99.40% 51,702 99.44 102,812 99.43
Total HH Population (>10 y.o.) 51,417 49.72 51,989 50.28 103,406 100
Source: PSA 2015 CPH
The following information shows the percentage of the educational attainment of the
population of the City of Naga as of 2015 (Table 2.4- 10):
Table 2.4- 10 shows the highest grade completed of the population 5 years old and
older in the municipality. According to the data, high school and elementary are the
most common educational attainment in Minglanilla.
Special education 60 2 2 3 3 5 1 2 6 2 1 2 3 1 1 15 4 1 6
105 239 257 263 268 257 228 128 145 146 153 1274
Elementary 36943 640 419 303 329 303 255
7 9 8 1 3 7 7 5 8 0 9 0
105 239 257 263 216
1st - 4th grade 19569 397 379 222 160 137 115 112 112 83 507 522 580 4912
7 9 8 1 6
127 6312
5th - 6th grade 6063 517
0
694 237 144 94
5
80 62 53 310 295 276 1968
121
Graduate 11311 410 826 336 188 2182 137 129 119 641 643 683 5860
4
144 242 275 159 133 117 563 506 407 1342
High school 41500 414 1429
7 2 3 1 1 3 0 1 1 5
144 242 259 149 127 104
Undergraduate 17746 414 753 643 459 393 4130
7 2 7 3 5 4
413 378 302
Graduate 23754 156 948 872 780 9295
7 6 7
Postsecondary 1560 1 18 187 246 178 930
Undergraduate 8 1 1 6
Graduate 1552 18 187 245 178 924
College 119 108 303 156 140
14328 332 994 4718
undergraduate 9 7 8 6 4
Baccalaureate/ 248 284 311 1077
19290 75
college graduate 6 0 5 4
Postbaccalaureat
188 5 11 24 148
e
Not stated 6 6
12857
11226
43211
2581
2694
2728
2639
2662
2709
2590
2711
2744
3075
3187
2824
2930
2843
2614
1035
TOTAL 119190
Commercial/ Institutional
Tenure Status of the Housing Unit Number of Single Multi-unit Not
Duplex industrial/ living Others
and Lot Households house residential reported
agricultural quarter
Own or owner like possession
3,132 3,027 92 8 3 - - 2
of house and lot
Not Applicable - - - - - - - -
Not Reported - - - - - - - -
2.4.8 Housing
In 2015, about 36.6% of lots and 91.2% of housing units are owned. A great percentage of households (59.4%) rent their lots for free
with and without consent. Regarding housing types, majority of occupied homes (92.6%) in the City are single houses. Table 2.4-13
shows the tenure status and building types of occupied housing in more detail.
Table 2.4- 13 shows that 67% of lots and 85.2% of housing units are owned, the rest of
the lots and housing units are rented either with charge or for free. According to the
same Table, majority of the housing units (76.6%) are single house types. The second
and third most common housing types are multi-unit residential (15.2%) and duplex
(8%), respectively.
As of 2015, there was an increase of 3.07% of housing units, while a total number of
6,057 or 26% of housing backlog remained. On the other hand, vacant housing units
have also increased to 85.45% (Table 2.4- 13). These are housing units which are in the
market but not within the reach of the population needing housing.
The Cebu Landmaster Inc. conducted an inventory of lands suitable for housing
purposes. An area of about 166,750m2 have been found in Barangay Langtad for
housing purposes. The current land use is residential and includes agri-industrial zone.
The area has low susceptibility for landslide.
Table 2.4- 14 Housing Situation for the Past Three Censal Years (2000, 2010 & 2015)
2010 2015 Latest Censal Year
2005 % Increase/ % Increase/ Increase/
No. No. No.
Decrease Decrease Decrease
Households (HH) 9522 9669 1.54 9669 0.00 9819 1.55
Household
47609 48347 1.55 48347 0.00 49096 1.55
Population
Housing Units
9265 9388 1.33 9388 0.00 9676 3.07
(HU)
Occupied HU 9138 9278 1.53 9278 0.00 9472 2.09
Vacant HU 127 110 -13.39 110 0.00 204 85.45
Ratio of HH to
0.19 0.19 0.19 0.20
Occupied HU
Ratio of HH
Population to 5.21 5.21 5.21 5.18
Occupied HU
Source: NSO/PSA
2.4.9.2 The Municipality of Minglanilla
Growth rate
- 3.27 3.55 3.55 5.84 5.65 7.50 4.71
(%)
Todate there are more or less 82 subdivisions in the Municipality and counting.
Subdivision developers, owning to their social responsibility, have complied to provide
low-cost housing for informal settlers. However, the Municipality still needs to develop
a local shelter program for the poor constituents who cannot afford the low-cost
housing established by developers.
2.4.10 Agriculture
Agriculture is one of the major sources for livelihood in the City of Naga. The major
crops produced by the city are coconut, corn, mango, and rice. Most of the first three
(3) major crops are marketed to neighboring municipalities, Naga Public Market, and
Carbon Market in Cebu City. Rice, on the other hand, is for local consumption.
The major and minor agricultural occupation/groups in the city include the following:
crops farmers; orchard farmers; livestock and dairy farmers; poultry farmers; aqua farm
cultivators; inland and coastal fisherfolks; and deep-sea fisher folks. In Barangay Cogon
and Lanas in particular, the agricultural occupations are crop farming, orchard
farming, livestock and dairy farming, and poultry farming. Women outnumber men in
the farming sector, accounting to 60% of the total number of persons in the farming
business. This reality is attuned to the fact that more men in the productive age group
are seeking jobs outside farming and more women are left at home to tend to farms
(see Table 2.4- 17).
Farming is more common in rural areas than in urbanized barangays largely due to the
availability of farmable lands in rural areas. Fishing, on the other hand, is more common
in urban/coastal barangays, however, there are more farmers than fisherfolks. About
According to the Office of the City Agriculture, post-harvest facilities such as hand
tractors and mechanical shredders are available and are being utilized in Barangay
Lanas. These facilities are owned either by the Farmers’ Association or the Cooperative.
Table 2.4- 17 Major & Minor Agricultural Occupations/Groups in Barangay Cogon & Lanas, 2015
Major/Minor Urban Rural Total
Occupational Barangay
Groups M F Total M F Total M F
Cogon 0 0 0 14 21 35 14 21
Crop farmers
Lanas 0 0 0 36 53 89 36 53
Cogon 0 0 0 27 41 68 27 41
Livestock and
dairy farmers
Lanas 0 0 0 40 61 101 40 61
Cogon 0 0 0 14 21 35 14 21
Poultry farmers
Lanas 0 0 0 36 53 89 36 53
All livestock and poultry farmers in Naga engage in backyard poultry farming.
Carabaos, cattle, goats, and chickens are farmed in both Barangay Cogon and
Lanas, and hogs are also raised in Barangay Lanas. All of which are marketed locally.
(Refer to Table 2.4- 18).
Table 2.4- 18 Existing Livestock and Poultry Farms in Barangay Cogon and Lanas, 2015
Type Location Area No. of Product Annual Production Product No. of Hazard
(Ha) Heads Classification Market Tenants Susceptibility
Vol. Value
(Ton) (PhP)
Livestock
Hog Lanas 0.103 103 Backyard 8.24 1,071,200 Local 10 Landslide (H)
Poultry
Almost half (49%) of the area of City of Naga has agricultural production (Table 2.4-
19). From Figure 2.4- 8, it would be gleaned that agriculture supports at least 29% of the
gainful occupations in City of Naga. Coconut production comprises 9% of total land
area and 30% of agricultural area. Areas planted with corn in 2015 comprise 13% of the
total land area and 45% of the agricultural land area. Rice production is not significant,
and corn is primarily consumed for subsistence and not sold as an agricultural product.
Mango plantations occupy 7% of the total land area of Naga and 23% of the total
agricultural lands. The land areas for coconut and mango production decreased from
2014 to 2015 due to conversion to residential use. According to the City CLUP, most of
the agricultural products of Naga are consumed for subsistence, and there has been
an increase in backyard farming. Although a decrease land area for coconut and
mango plantation was observed, the farmers have managed to increase the total
land productivity for coconut and mango (Table 2.4- 19). The City CLUP acknowledges
declining trend of agricultural land use.
Lowland, agricultural lands in Minglanilla have been decreasing over the decades as
they are being converted to other land uses. Thus, residents have considerably
become less dependent on agriculture for their livelihood. However, some farmers still fill
available land, while some transferred to the upland to start agro-forestry and agro-
livestock development.
In 1997, 1,088 farmers were reported. The major crops produced, and land devoted to
them are shown in Table 2.4- 20. Mango is the most important crop, followed by corn
consumed as part of staple food as rice production is low. Backyard livestock and
poultry production in Minglanilla is significant, supplying consumers in Cebu City.
The local government of Minglanilla identified seven (7) upland barangays, including
Guindarohan, to be Strategic Agriculture and Fisheries Development Zones (SAFDZ).
Livestock and poultry are a dominant source of income in the municipality. There are
no commercial cattle farm in Minglanilla; backyard raising is the most common for
livestock/poultry farmers. The main livestock and poultry produced are (Table 2.4- 21):
Table 2.4- 21 Estimated Livestock & Poultry Population on Backyard Raising in Minglanilla
Estimated Weight Estimated Value
Animal No. of Head
(MT) (PhP)
2.4.11 Employment
Table 2.4- 22 Labor Force Population in Naga by Sex and Employment Status, 2015
Population 15
Sex Employed % Unemployed %
Yrs. and Over
Male 34,654
Female 35,758
The total employment from businesses and trades in Naga is 3,368 with a total revenue
of PhP20,143,694.55. Hotels and restaurants, transport and storage have the most
employees at 1,189. The highest revenue earner, however, has been on wholesale and
retail trade with PhP11,203,277.35 revenue. However, the commercial activity with the
highest revenue per employee is from real estate and renting businesses, generating
PhP22,001.11 per employee. The lowest per employee is from the category, “others” at
PhP689 per employee. (See Table 2.4- 22).
“Crafts and related trades” defined as “the application of skills and knowledge to
construct and maintain buildings, form metal, erect metal structures, set machine tools,
or make, fit, maintain and repair machinery, equipment or tools, carry out printing work,
produce or process foodstuffs, textiles, or wooden, metal and other articles, including
handicraft goods” is cited as the occupation of 21% and 22% of the labor for of City of
Naga and Minglanilla respectively. The proximity of Naga City and Minglanilla to Cebu City
also make Naga and Minglanilla alternative locations for residence or “bed town” of workers in
the “booming” industries and commerce in Cebu City where competition for limited real estate
is high, land prices are escalating as residential lands are being rapidly converted to
commercial land uses.
Table 2.4- 24 Projected School-Age Population, Labor Force, and Dependent Population, Naga
Projected Population
Participation
Grouping 2015
Rate
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
Labor Force 70,412 0.61 70,963.37 71,321.01 71,680.49 72,041.73 72,404.86 74,247.92
Dependent
Young (0-14) 40,911 0.35 40,716.69 40,921.89 41,128.15 41,335.42 41,543.77 42,601.26
The productive age group of 15 to 59 years old comprises 56.03% of the total
population in 2015. The Potential Labor Force (PLF) of 15 to 64 years old represents
59.22% of the total population in 2015. Considering the PLF and the Dependent Age
Group (DAG), the dependency ratio will be 1:0.61 or for one (1) worker there would be
0.69 dependent. For those 15 years old and above, it is estimated that 53% are
employed such as self-employment, service employees, daily paid workers, manual
Impact Assessment – The People 412
laborers, and regular employees in the government and private sectors. The remaining
47% of this age group are unemployed. (See Table 2.4- 22 and Table 2.4- 23).
According to the Office of the City Business Processing and Licensing System, the total
recorded formal employment in all categories of economic activity for 2015 was 6,399,
only 5.5% of the total population in Naga (Table 2.4- 25).
There has also been an increase of overseas Filipino workers (OFW) by 10.67% in 2015
compared to the 2014 (Table 2.4-26). The trend indicates a growing number of
Nagahanons seeking overseas employment.
Primary
Fishing 0%
Secondary
Tertiary
Table 2.4- 26
Overseas Workers from Naga, 2011-2015
Increase / Decrease in
No. of Overseas Workers Increase/ Decrease in No.
Percent (%)
Year
Total M F Total M F Total M F
Within the JLR MPSA-Host Barangays in Naga, the following basic sectors of farming,
agroforestry, charcoal-making, and quarrying provide livelihood to a good number of
families (see Figure 2.4- 9).
50
40
No. of Families
30
20
10
0
Farming Agroforestry Charcoal Making Quarrying
Cogon Lanas
The municipality of Minglanilla is no longer reliant on agriculture for the livelihood of its
people because of its limited agricultural land and the increasing urbanization of the
municipality. Most of its workers are now employed either in service activities or in
industries that proliferate in the municipality. Many also work outside of the
municipality, particularly in the many business firms in Cebu or in other parts of Metro
Cebu. Aside from private employment some local people also work in various
government offices in the municipality or in Cebu City. Others are engaged in private
business like operating a small store or service shop or in buying and selling. Some are
also engaged in private practice of their professions like the lawyers, doctors, and
engineers.
In 2015, it was reported that the municipality had a total of 53,147 people considered
to be gainful workers (Figure 2.4-9).
The unemployment rate decreased during the economic boom of Cebu in the middle
of the 1990’s, wherein many new business activities were opened in many areas of
Metro Cebu, of which Minglanilla is a part. In fact, one big industry, the Pepsi Cola
Bottling Plant, came to resettle in the municipality, providing many jobs to local
workers.
Female Male
Fishing
Despite the rising urbanization of the municipality, fishing activity is still conducted by a
number of Minglanilla residents. As of 1997 the municipality still have a total of 95 full
time fishermen. Of the total 87 boats used by the fishermen, 69 were motorized and
only 18 were non-motorized. Total volume of fish production was reported at 805 metric
tons in 1997.
The municipal seawater off the cost of Minglanilla is a major fishery resource. The main
season for fishing is January to June and September to December. The major species
caught are "Bolinao", "Barongoy" and "Tulingan". Unlike before, however, fish caught in
the municipal seawater are no longer as plentiful as before due to overfishing and
pollution of the sea. The municipality has limited area for fishpond although one firm
was reported to be engaged in prawn hatchery.
Originally, commercial activities were centered only in the public market and
surrounding areas. Because of the increasing urbanization of the municipality, business
activities have gone out of the market center, mostly toward the areas along the
national highway, which serves as the main artery of the municipality. Most of the
commercial business establishments in the municipality cater only to the needs of the
local population, however, some of the establishments found along the highway also
In 2015, households with sanitary toilets comprise of 76% of the total households of the
city, while those with unsanitary facilities composed of 24%. In Barangay Cogon, 611
households were recorded to have sanitary toilet facilities while 272 have what is
considered unsanitary toilet facilities. On the other hand, there are 360 households with
access to sanitary toilets in Barangay Lanas while 139 do not (Table 2.4- 27).
No Facility/ Field
Drop/Overhang
Shared Flush
Own Flush
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Cogon Lanas
For solid waste generation, the City population has an average of 50.38 tons garbage
generated daily, with an average of 26.13 tons collected by the LGU daily, and 24.25
tons collected per day by FDRCon the private company contracted by Naga City to
manage its municipal solid wastes. Based on FDRCon’s Waste Analysis and
Characterization Study (WACS), 47% comprises of household wastes, 23% constitutes
recyclable wastes, 20% composes of residual wastes, and special wastes make up 2%
of the total generated wastes. Meanwhile, for other point sources (OPS) that include
industries, business establishments, markets, institutions, recreation and service facilities,
and other non-household sources, the percentages are as follows: biodegradable
15%, recyclable 13%, residual 68%, and special less than 1%.
The garbage collected by FDRCon and the City LGU are disposed-of using alternative
technologies such as the Refuse Derived Fuel, biogas, and composting and material
recovery. Garbage that are not collected comprise of 29% of the total solid waste
generated. This garbage is either dumped anywhere or burned by the residents in
open spaces.
*As seen on Table 2.4- 31, water related diseases are among the top leading causes of
morbidity.
Impact Assessment – The People 417
2.4.12.2 The Municipality of Minglanilla
The health of the people in the municipality is greatly affected by the health practices
of the people, particularly in the use of toilets. Latest data showed that in at least 10
barangays of the municipality, only 68.5% of the total number of households had toilets
(Table 2.4- 27). In Barangay Guindarohan 86.34% of households have sanitary toilets.
There is no available data for Camp 8.
Table 2.4- 27 Number of Households With and Without Toilets by Selected Barangays in
Minglanilla, 1990
Barangay No. of Households HH With Toilets HH w/o Toilets Percent W/ Toilet
Tulay 633 546 87 86:96
Tungkop 771 543 228 70.43
Guindaruhan 322 278 44 86.34
Tunghaan 992 803 189 80.95
Pob. Ward 1 315 279 36 88.57
Pob. Ward 2 284 151 133 53.17
Pob. Ward 3 361 275 86 76.18
Pob. ward 4 292 223 69 76.37
Vito 650 202 448 31.08
Cadulawan 338 97 241 28.70
All Barangays 4,958 3,397 1,561 68.52
Source: CLUP of the Municipality of Minglanilla, 1999-2009
More than a third or 34.7% of the total number of households in the municipality of
Minglanilla had no toilets. Considering that Minglanilla is fast urbanizing, the lack of
toilets in many of its households poses a big heath problem to the people of the
municipality. The problem was even heightening by the fact that only 25% of the total
number of households were using water sealed toilets exclusively. The rest are using
water sealed toilets with other households and other kinds including the open pit
method, which are considered unsanitary (Table 2.4- 28).
Table 2.4- 28 Number of Households by Kind of Toilet Facility Being Used, 1990
Kind of Toilet Facility Being Used by No. of
%
Household Households
Water-sealed Sewer/ Septic Tank Used
2,296 24.87
Exclusively by Household
Water-sealed Sewer/ Septic Tank Shared
545 5.90
with Other Household
Water- Sealed, Other Depository, Used
1,163 12.60
Exclusively by Household
Water Sealed, Other Depository Shared
671 7.27
with Other Households
Closed Pit 745 8.07
Open Pit 557 6.03
Other Methods 51 0.55
None 3,205 34.71
Total Households 9,233 100.00
Environmental sanitation is being handled by three (3) Rural Sanitary Inspectors, under
the Municipal Health Office.
The health of the people in the municipality is greatly affected by the health practices
of the people, particularly in the use of toilets. Data from the Comprehensive
Development Plan of the municipality show that out of 25,448 households in 2018, only
20,709 or 81.38% households have sanitary toilets in Minglanilla.
For its solid waste management, Minglanilla entered into an agreement with the FDR-
CON in 2007 for a 25-year contract garbage disposal, the latter having their private
landfill in the City of Naga. FDRCon is a resource recovery and disposal facility. The
contractor handles the collection, disposal, transport, and treatment of solid wastes at
its Resource Recovery Management Plant in Pangdan. The Municipality used to
operate an open dumpsite, which, later was converted into a controlled dumpsite.
The operation of the controlled dumpsite was closed in 2011 – and from then on, open
dumpsite was no longer allowed. Materials Recovery Facilities (MRFs) were also
required in each barangay and in the municipality. It cannot be gainsaid, however,
that the MRFs were not fully operational.
The records of the FDR-CON show the average waste generation of 0.28
kilograms/person/day. Given that, the average garbage generated per day is 37 tons
or 1,110 tons a month. Table 2.4- 30 showed the volume of garbage (in tons) disposed
by the Municipality of Minglanilla in the Sanitary Landfill of FDR-CON, compared with
The prohibition of operating dumpsites compelled the municipality to have its own
sanitary landfill. They are planning to enter into joint venture with JOMARA, a private
company engaged in landfill operation, for the dumping of residual wastes. Pending
the agreement with JOMARA for the construction of its own sanitary landfill, the
municipality still avails the services of FDR-CON.
The following morbidity and mortality statistics will be updated with available
information from the LGU.
Upper Respiratory Tract Infections were the most frequent illness among the residents
of Naga City Cebu from 2011 to 2015. URTI involve irritation and swelling of the nasal
passages, the sinuses, pharynx, larynx, and large airways. Clinically, URTI includes acute
bronchitis, the common cold, influenza, and respiratory distress syndromes. A variety of
viruses and bacteria cause upper respiratory tract infections. The most common virus
that trigger URTI is rhinovirus or the cold virus. Other viruses include the influenza virus,
adenovirus, enterovirus, and respiratory syncytial virus. Bacteria may cause roughly 15%
of sudden onset of pharyngitis presentations. The most common is S. pyogenes, a strain
of streptococcus. URTI usually involves direct invasion of the upper airway mucosa by
virus or bacteria. The viruses or bacteria are usually acquired by inhalation of infected
droplets. Barriers that prevent the organism from attaching to the mucosa include 1)
the hair lining that traps the pathogens, 2) the mucus which also traps organisms 3) the
angle between the pharynx and nose which prevents particles from falling into the
airways and 4) ciliated cells in the lower airways that transport the pathogens back to
the pharynx. The adenoids and tonsils also contain immunological cells that attack the
pathogens. The risk factors for acquiring URTI are:
• Close contact with persons with colds, cough, and naso-pharyngeal infections
• Asthma and allergic rhinitis develop into URI
• Smoking
• Immunodeficiency, including precondition of cystic fibrosis, HIV, use of
corticosteroids or having previous transplants
• nasal polyposis
All the reported morbidity rates in Naga City have an increasing trend (see Table 2.4-
31). The more alarming causes are the following:
Table 2.4- 31 Five-Year Top Morbidity Causes, City of Naga 2011 to 2015
(in per 1000 population)
8 Thomas M, Bomar PA. Upper Respiratory Tract Infection. [Updated 2021 Jun 30]. In: StatPearls [Internet].
Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2021 Jan-. Available from:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK532961/
Similar to the prevalent illness in Naga City and the Philippines, URTI and Pneumonia
were also the top 2 illnesses in Minglanilla in 1995 (Table 2.4- 32). (Bacterial) skin
infection, diarrhea and (viral) influenza are among the top 5 diseases. These diseases
are environmental in nature and are preventable with certain health protocols
including vaccines. Proper management of human biological wastes are also key in
controlling the incidence of diarrhea.
Similar to the national situation, the top mortality causes are due to lifestyle choices:
diseases of the heart, metabolism, cancer, and violent causes (i.e., gunshot). Despite
this, death due to malnutrition also increased from 0.065 per thousand population in
2012, to 0.78 in 2015. The overall mortality rate reduced by 28% from 2011 to 2015.
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease 0.085 0.074 0.000 0.035 0.060 -0.29
25 0.3
20 0.2
Rate per 1000 population
15 0.2
Incidence
10 0.1
5 0.1
0 0.0
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Figure 2.4- 12 Infant and Young Child Mortality Rate, Naga City, 2011 to 2015
Similar to the national situation, heart-related diseases were the most frequent cause
of mortality in Minglanilla in 2000. Also similar to the nationwide situation, following
heart diseases, cancer followed in rank. Bacterial causes (Pneumonia, tuberculosis)
and lifestyle (diabetes) accounted for the larger proportion of mortality causes.
The government medical facilities in the City of Naga are managed by the Vicente
Mendiola Center for Health (VMCH), which serves as the City Health Office (CHO) and
center for birthing services, and 26 Barangay Health Stations (BHS). The birthing services
will be transformed into an infirmary with a 25-bed capacity. There are also 16 private
medical and dental clinics and birthing homes, in one private tertiary hospital, the
South General Hospital. The Apo Cement Corporation also has a clinic located in
barangay Tina-an keeping to the health care needs of its employees.
The VMCH with the BHS is run by a total 94 health personnel and 358 health volunteers
like the Barangay Health Workers and Barangay Nutrition Scholars. there are 33 health
personnel in private/ dental clinics and birthing homes. In South General Hospital, there
are 428 health personnel directly involved in patient care.
During emergency or specialized cases, referrals are made to the nearby Minglanilla
District Hospital or to Don Vicente Sotto Memorial Hospital in Cebu City.
The VMCH provides a broad range of services, covering mostly referrals from the BHS
and the preventive, promotive and curative if aspects of health care. It delivers health
services through the following programs:
The BHS is the initial unit that dispenses basic or Primary Health care. Introduce the
following services: prenatal, intra-natal, postnatal assistance to mothers; immunization
or vaccination; health education; environmental sanitation; family planning; nutrition;
first aid; and referrals.
Most of the private health facilities in the coastal and low-lying areas are susceptible
to low and high flooding, while two (2) birthing homes located in hilly areas are
susceptible to landslide. About 15 of the total 26 BHS are susceptible to moderate and
high landslide accounting to 35% and 23% respectively.
About five (5) BHS in coastal areas are susceptible to low flooding representing 19% of
all the BHS and three (3) BHS are prone to high flooding at 12% of all the BHS.
Based under standards in RHU personnel for population per RA 1082, the City of Naga
has met the requirements considering its No. VIII category (having a population of
50,001 and over). The main facility has five (5) doctors, five (5) nurses, 22 midwives, in
five (5) rural sanitation inspectors.
There are two hospitals in Minglanilla, a district hospital which is under the
administration of the provincial government and a private hospital located in Brgy.
Linao. Thirty-eight (38) public and private clinics are also present in the municipality,
with seven (7) private lying-in clinics and three (3) diagnostic laboratories. The main
health center, however, is the Municipal Health Office (MHO) or also known as the
Minglanilla, Cebu Rural Health Unit I & II.
There are 27 daycare centers in Minglanilla with all barangays having a day care
center of its own. The big barangays of Guindaruhan, Tulay, Tungkil, Tunghaan, Linao
and Vito each have two (2) daycare centers.
These water providers conduct their regular water testing, which has passed the
Philippine National Standard for Drinking Water (PNSDW).
Table 2.4- 35 below shows the number of households in the city by the main source of
water supply for drinking and cooking.
Table 2.4- 35 Number of Households by Main Source of Water Supply for Drinking in Naga, 2015
For Drinking Water For Cooking
Main Source of Water Supply No. of No. of
% %
Households Households
Own use faucet community water
2,008 7.67 6,640 25.37
system
Shared faucet community water
1,837 7.02 3,298 12.60
system
Own use tubed/piped deep well 725 2.77 1,834 7.01
Shared tubed/piped deep well 3,188 12.18 5,366 20.50
Tubed/piped shallow well 748 2.86 1,029 3.93
Dug well 2,369 9.05 2,848 10.88
Protected spring 3,130 11.96 3,921 14.98
Unprotected spring 144 0.55 136 0.52
Lake, river, rain, and others 178 0.68 252 0.96
Peddler 32 0.12 59 0.23
Bottled waters 11,814 45.13 793 3.03
Others 4 0.02 1 0.00
Not reported - - - 0.00
Total number of households 26,177 100 26,177 100.00
Source: Philippine Statistics Authority, 2015 Census of Population
About 81% of the households in the City of Naga are served level III water supply (Table
2.4-36 describes the different water level types). The remaining households rely on level
I and level II water supply.
Source: World Bank Water and Sanitation Program – East Asia and the Pacific
About 55.10% of the households in the City of Naga are served with Level I water supply
system. 20.42% of households rely on deep wells as the primary Level I water source,
while 34.68% rely on other Level I water supply systems, such as shallow wells and
improved springs. Most of the Level I water supply systems have moderate to high
susceptibility to flood and landslide.
About 61% of households in the city are served through communal faucets (a type of
Level II water system), all of which have good water quality. Most, however, have high
susceptibility to landslide. Two of the pump systems in the city are located in and
serving Barangay Cogon, while one is in and serves Barangay Lanas (Table 2.4- 37). For
Level II shared water supply systems in the City of Naga, all are in good condition,
however, most are moderately to highly susceptible to landslide, and have low
susceptibility to flood. About 8% of households in the city still rely on communal faucets.
Table 2.4- 37 Level II Water Supply System in Cogon and Lanas, 2015 (Pump)
Location
Barangay Cogon Barangay Lanas
Barangay Served
Year Constructed 1960 1976 1975
Pump Capacity (Estimated
60 10 10
Liters/Min)
Water Source (Groundwater,
Deep well Improved spring Improved spring
Improved Spring, Deep well)
No. of HH Served 85 341 347
Physical Condition Good Good Good
Flood
Landslide M H H
Tsunami
Hazard StormSurge1
Susceptibility Storm Surge 2
Storm Surge 3
Storm Surge 4
Fault
Source: Barangay LGU
As per Table 2.4- 38, the total water requirement from the population, agro-industries,
commercial activities, and irrigation is 7.32M cu. m. per month. In 2025, the water
requirement will be 428.20M cu. m.
More particularly, the water resources in Barangay Cogon are located in Purok Calupe
and Sitio Riverside. The water resources of Barangay Lanas, on the other hand, are in
Purok Gumamela and Purok Rose.
Fresh and potable water is generally abundant in Minglanilla since there are surface
water sources especially in mountain barangays. The barangays along the national
highway are either serviced by privately owned water service company like the Help
Mate, or the Minglanilla Water Supply Cooperative (MIWASSCO), or by the
Metropolitan Cebu Water District (MCWD). These water systems are operated by the
LGU. Under MIWASCO, the municipality is supplied with an estimated 2,960 m3 of water
per day through 3,706-3,719 connections. The approximated daily consumption of
Minglanilla per capita is 142 liters (MCWD Databook, 2013).
Those not served with the new Level III water system must get their water from Level I
or point source water system. These are being provided by the government through
the DPWH in form of a shallow or deep well or a developed spring or rain collector in
the different rural barangays in the country. Minglanilla was also recipient of five (5)
deep wells constructed by Central Visayas Water and Sanitation Project (CVWSP).
Subdivisions are not reached by the water system either have their own system, or the
occupants have their own individual pumps. Table 2.4-39 shows the main source of
water supply in the municipality for drinking and cooking per household:
Table 2.4- 39 Number of Households by Main Source of Water Supply for Drinking in Minglanilla,
2015
For Drinking Water For Cooking
Main Source of Water Supply No. of No. of
% %
Households Households
Own use faucet community water
3,855 12.60 15,147 49.50
system
Shared faucet community water
2,132 6.97 4,689 15.32
system
Impact Assessment – The People 429
For Drinking Water For Cooking
Main Source of Water Supply No. of No. of
% %
Households Households
Own use tubed/piped deep well 954 3.12 1,875 6.13
Shared tubed/piped deep well 1,798 5.88 4,893 15.99
Tubed/piped shallow well 202 0.66 383 1.25
Dug well 271 0.89 538 1.76
Protected spring 1,845 6.03 2,228 7.28
Unprotected spring 1 0.00 2 0.01
Lake, river, rain, and others 3 0.01 7 0.02
Peddler 404 1.32 145 0.47
Bottled waters 19,134 62.53146 692 2.26
Others - - - 0.00
Not reported - - - 0.00
Total number of households 30,599 100 30,599 100.00
Source: Philippine Statistics Authority, 2015 Census of Population
In Barangay Guindaruhan, the water resources are located in Sitio Candatu and Sitio
Balisong Deep Well, while the water resources of Camp 8 are in Sitio Sibulan and Sitio
Bucao.
2.4.19 Project impact on existing disease profile including weather sensitive diseases and impact
aggravation as a result of climate change
From the statement of the Barangay Captain of Cogon, the JLR has significantly
assisted in the provision of health services to the Barangay. In the statement of the
senior Barangay Health Worker, they are able to deliver a satisfactory level of health
service due to the following support of JLR:
The needs in medical and health services expressed by the MPSA host barangays such
ambulance and continued support for medicines and visits of health practitioners are
already in the JLR Social Development and Management Program.
The leading causes of morbidity in Minglanilla are upper respiratory tract infection
(URTI), pneumonia, skin infection and diarrhea. The other leading causes of morbidity
are influenza, parasites, anemia, diseases of the eye, ear, nose and through and
pulmonary tuberculosis.
The proposed project will contribute to preserving the local micro-climate with its tree
planting program. The Project is not expected to contribute to the aggravation of the
frequency of diseases that thrive under warmer tropical temperature. The project
greenhouse gas contribution is a small percentage of the potential carbon sink
generation. It will also be a source of additional funding for the delivery of medical
services to its host community.
Electricity in the City of Naga is provided by the Visayan Electric Company (VECO). Of
the total 23,150 households in the city, about 90% have electrical connection while 10%
have no electrical power. As of 2016, a total of 1,401,430,675 kilowatts (KW) was used
by the city for all residential, commercial, industrial, and institutional sectors. Table 2.4-
40 shows the households served with electricity for the 2013 to 2015.
There are three (3) power substations owned by KEPCO-SPC Power Corporation
(KSPC), one (1) owned by VECO, and one (1) owned by the National Grid Corporation
of the Philippines (NGCP) in the city. KEPCO is also a power producing company.
As per Table 2.4- 40, in 2015, 11 or 93.74% of households in urban areas are served with
electricity, and 17 barangays or 86.29% households are with electricity in rural areas.
Overall, 89.97% households are powered in Naga. 6.26% in the urban poor (indigenous
informal settlers) cannot afford electrical connection particularly in North and South
Poblacion, as agreed by Ms. Brenda, CSWD.
The total connections for all sectors are 21,841. Most (90%) connections are for
household use with a total KW 6,234,357.50 for 2015 and an average of 25KW per
household per month. The highest electricity consumption has been the industrial
sector amounting to 668,332,239.76KW for 2015. Connections to users have increased
from a total of 17,191 in 2013 to 21,841 in 2015. (Table 2.4- 41).
According to Table 2.4- 41, there is an increasing no. of power connections in all
sectors. Industrial establishments have the most power consumption among other
types of consumers, while residential consumers have the least percentage of power
consumed. The average power consumption is 16.72 M (KW). Power consumption has
been increasing with an average of 25.52% per year.
The KEPCO-SPC was constructed in the city in 2011 to serve as an independent power
producing company. It occupies a land area of 1.4404 hectares. This company
susceptible to low flooding.
Power distribution in the city is through the Visayan Electric Company (VECO).
Table 2.4- 42 Inventory of Public Land Transportation Vehicles in Naga by Type and Service Route, 2015
Registered in City From Other City
Type of Public Route/Destination Total No. Route/ Destination
Total
Utility Vehicle Barangay to Barangay to
No. Within Barangay City/ Center
Barangay City
Buses N/A
Naga Proper to Uling
PUJs N/A 578 Naga Proper to Basak
Naga Proper to Punta
Taxi/FX N/A
Tricycles 102 102
Trisikad 477 477
Habal-habal 363 363
Source: Office of the Business Permit and licensing System, Office of the City Planning and Development Coordinator, Barangay LGU; National Competitiveness Council (BLGU Survey)
There are three substations owned and operated by KEPCO-SPC occupying a total
land area of 0.102 hectors and having a voltage each of 133 KV. The substations have
low susceptibility to flooding.
Three communication facilities are available in the City of Naga: postal services;
telephone services; and cell sites network.
The Postal Service office is publicly owned while telephone and cell sites networks are
owned by four (4) and three (3) private companies, respectively. These facilities are
susceptible to varying degrees of hazards such as flooding coastal areas in the river
bodies, and landslides in upland/sloping/hilly/mountainous areas.
There are seven cell sites owned by Smart, Globe, and Sun occupying a total land area
of 0.1887 hectares. However, additional cell sites are needed particularly in rural or
mountainous areas for better communication services.
The dominant form of transport going to Cebu City from Naga is by PUJs or multicabs,
with a total number of 578 PUJs. This form of transport also plies the Naga-Uling Road.
Other land transport vehicles include 102 tricycles, 477 trisikads (pedaled three-
There are no designated land transportation terminals in the City of Naga as buses and
vans usually ply the main highway going further down south or going to Cebu City.
There are, however, temporary terminals for PUJs/multicabs and other types of
passenger vehicles in East Poblacion.
Another of transportation is through sea (Bohol Strait). There are four (4) seaports or
warps owned by private companies for the transport of cargo going to and coming
from the other places in Naga. These facilities are in good condition with a low to
moderate risk of flooding.
Communication systems and facilities are already in placed in Minglanilla and these
include the Philippine Long Distance Telephone (PLDT), and the Globe Telecom.
Wireless networks are also available such as Globe, Smart, Sun Cellular, etc. Internet
and wi-fi connection also cover entire area of Minglanilla.
There are fourteen (14) cellular sites in the Municipality of Minglanilla which in
Barangays Cadulawan, Calajoan, Camp 7, Linao (3 sites), Pakigne, Poblacion Ward 3,
Tubod, Tungkil (2 sites), Tungkop (2 sites) and Vito. These cell sites provide strong signal
to wireless phones and gadgets.
Minglanilla is still being served by the telegram and postal facilities of the government.
It is also reached by almost all types of radio and television broadcasts and by the
national and local print media. Most houses have a radio and TV, which can provide
them with entertainment, news broadcasts and other information.
2.4.26 Transportation
For its land transport needs the municipality is presently served with an array of transport
facilities. Those going to Cebu City are served by PUJs and buses plying the route from
Cebu City to Minglanilla and other municipalities in the south. Intra and inter-barangay
travel within the municipality are generally served with tricycles. While travel within the
Poblacion Wards and other barangays along the highway are well served with reliable
transport facilities, travel to the mountain barangays in the municipality is still a problem
and depend sometimes on the availability of enterprising motorcycle owners.
There are 11 commercial areas with a total land area of 2.239 hectares in the City of
Naga, none of which are in Barangay Cogon or Lanas. Most of the commercial areas
As of 2015, there were 35 large commercial establishments and five (5) banks in City of
Naga, Cebu, listed in Table 2.4- 44.
Table 2.4- 44 List of Large Commercial Establishments and Banks in City of Naga (2015)
Commercial Establishments BARANGAY
DVM CAR Craft Inc.
FDR Integrated Resource Recovery Management Inc.
Pangdan
AC Steel Industries Inc
Millennium Ocean Star Corporation
Venray Construction
Allgemeine-Bau-Chemie Phil. Naalad
Apo Cement Corp Tina-an
Apo land and Quarry Corp.
Asphalt Pavement Solutions Inc. Tangke
Impact Assessment – The People 436
Commercial Establishments BARANGAY
Jo-ed Farm
Petronas Energy Phils. Inc. Langtad
Cebu Stonehill Steel Corp.
Paseo Pesta
Unahco, Inc.
PSP Group Inc. West Pob
JLR Construction and Aggregates Inc. Cogon
Kepco SPC Power Corp. Colon
Meridian 123 Corporation Cantao-an
Tokyo Microshaft Corp.
Jeljie Farm
Pryce Gases Inc. Poblacion
Quarry Ventures Phils Inc. Uling
Samson Poultry Farm
Poultry Dressing Plant Bairan
Samson Poultry Farm Tuyan
Rikio Southeast Asia Inc. Inayagan
Surewood Preserving Company
Mining & Quarrying
Apo Land & Quarry Corporation Tina-an
Quarry Ventures Phils Inc. Uling
Apo land and Quarry Corp.
Toledo Aggregates & Const. Dev. Corporation Lutac
SJS Sand & Gravel & Trucking Services Naalad
Sagittarius Quarry Resources & Services Cogon
Reyco's Quarry Tangke
Mc Queen Logistic Pangdan
Banks
Data in 1997 (Table 2.4- 45) showed there are a significant number of commercial
establishments in Minglanilla. General merchandising comprised the biggest group of
business establishments in the municipality with 350 firms. This was followed by
contractors of various types, restaurants and food dealers, and bakery with 21 firms.
The above establishments located in the municipality were producing not only to meet
local needs but also for the province and for export. Among the important industries in
the municipalities were the following:
Banks
Metrobank
Sugbuanon Rural Bank
East west Bank
Allied Banking Corporation
2.4.28 Peace and Order
The Police Headquarters in Naga is situated in South Poblacion, while the City of Naga
Jail is in Naalad.
The barangay security force is called the tanod, whose main responsibility is to maintain
peace in order including traffic management in the barangay. The services include
the Barangay Health Workers (BHW) and watchmen. Aside from Grand Theft in Primary
Health care, the BHWs are also cast in disaster prevention, response, and mitigation.
The problems faced by these personnel or volunteers include limited training programs,
insufficient equipment, and lack of manpower.
As of 2015, there are 20 tanod, 10 BHW, and 10 officials in Barangay Cogon, while there
are 20 tanod, 10 BHW, and 12 officials in Barangay Lanas. The tanod are provided with
handcuffs, handheld radios, and clubs, all in good condition. On the other hand, the
BHW and officials are supplied with first aid kit, ropes, flashlights, and boots, which are
Impact Assessment – The People 438
also in good condition, so that they can respond to disasters and emergencies. There
are no traffic enforcers in both barangays.
Protective services are provided by the Philippine National Police (PNP) under the
control of the Department of Interior and Local Government. The Minglanilla Municipal
Police Station is currently located in Poblacion Ward I. Data from 2018 show it is
manned with 35 uniformed and four (4) non-uniformed dedicated policemen.
The personnel have exerted efforts and activities to prevent crime through public
information e.g., Pulong-pulong, Symposium, Seminars, Training, Sticker and Flyer
Distribution, Lectures, House to House Visitation, Text Brigade, Beat and Foot Patrol,
Tarpaulin Posting and Security Survey / Inspection of Establishment. It also continued to
seek the support and cooperation of the public in the maintenance of the peace and
order situation in the whole municipality by engaging them in some programs and
activities, like the “LolliCops”, where lollipops are freely given with a tiny ribbon, written
in it some sayings and the hotline number of PNP-Minglanilla.
The sports and recreational facilities in rural barangays of the City of Naga are mostly
basketball courts, covered courts, school parks, playgrounds, and hiking areas. In
urban barangays, the facilities include the badminton court, tennis court, swimming
pool, gymnasium (ECAC building), volleyball court, passive recreation areas (for
strolling, picnics, playing chess, movies, etc.), parks and playgrounds, jogging areas,
open or covered courts, basketball court, track over, and a sports field. This entails the
need for more sports recreation facilities in rural barangays. The facilities located in
rural barangays are prone to moderate-high risk landslide, while urban barangays are
susceptible to low and high flooding.
In Barangay Cogon specifically, there is a 405,306m2 public hiking area and a 674m2
public covered court, both in fair physical condition. The hiking area is highly
susceptible to landslide and the covered court is moderately susceptible to landslide.
Meanwhile, there is a 206m2 private open court located in Barangay Lunas. It is in fair
condition and is moderately susceptible to landslide. None of these facilities are used
as evacuation centers.
Table 2.4- 47 Crime Incidence for Children In Conflict with the Law in Naga, 2011-2015
Type of Crime 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Tot Case Offender Total Cases Offender Total Case Offender Tot Case Offender Total Offender
al s M F Solved M F s M F al s M F M F
Solve Solve Solve
d d d
Index Crimes 5 4 7 24 19 20 1 8 5 5 4 1 1
Crime Against Persons
a. Murder 1 1 1 1 1 2 2
b. Homicide 1 1 1 1
c. Physical Injury 1 1 3 1 3 1
d. Rape 1 1 1
Crime Against Property 4 4 6 1 1 1 5 4 2 3 1 1
a. Robbery 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 2
b. Theft 11 2 11 4 4 4 3 2 1 2 3 2 1 2 1 1
Non-Index Crimes 6 6 6 5 5 5 2 1 2 2 1 2 8 7 1
Source: PNP- City of Naga, 2016
Crimes in the City of Naga divided into index crimes, crimes against persons, crimes
against property, and no-index crimes, which were committed more by males than
females (Table 2.4- 46). Most of the crimes have been on crimes against persons. The
crime incidence has decreased over the years and the solution is pegged at a total of
less than 50%.
Most of the crime incidence by barangay by persons below 18 years old or Children in
Conflict (CICL) offenders have been males than females (Table 2.4- 47). The number
of cases has also been dropping since 2011.
Per records of the Minglanilla Police Station, crimes against property e.g., robbery and
theft are prevalent incidents in the recent years. Another big factor that leads to
commission of crimes is the use of illegal drugs. As of December 31, 2017 there were
183 cases involving illegal drugs which were filed in court. Forty-three (43) illegal
gambling cases were also submitted to court for adjudication. The presence of gangs
and fraternities among the schooled and out-of-school youths is another alarming
issue. Despite all these, however, the Municipality of Minglanilla remained a relatively
peaceful place to live, to visit and do business in.
The Table 2.4- 48 sums up the crime index of the Municipality of Minglanilla:
The crime rate is diminishing; the index crimes have significantly dropped from 1,093 to
178 or a decrease of 83.71% in the span of four (4) years. However, vehicular crime had
an erratic increase due to the increase in volume of vehicles using the highways.
PUJs, buses, and tricycles are the most commonly used public transportation in
Minglanilla (Section 2.4.20.4).
The Naga-Danao Express Way Project and the proposed Talisay-Naga By-pass Road
are also anticipated to significantly decrease the flow of traffic in the municipality.
The road inventory has shown that the City of Naga has a total of 122.27 kilometers for
a total of 84 road networks. Of these roads, 85% are barangay roads, 11% are city
roads, 2% are provincial roads, 2% are national roads. These roads are 46% concrete,
29% asphalted, and 25% plain earth. There are a total number of 63 ancillary road
facilities which include those used for pedestrian crossing, traffic light, and skywalk.
These road facilities are either in fair or good condition.
Based on the inventory of the LGU, there are 28 bridges in the city with a total length
of 26.53 kilometers. About 52% of these bridges can hold up to one (1) ton of weight.
About 7% can take up to 5 tons of weight and 31% has a capacity of 13 tons. Of the
28 bridges, 15 or 53.57% are steel bridges, 8 or 28.6% are concrete, and the remaining
17.8% are either box culverts or single span bridges. About 64% of these bridges are in
good condition, 32% are in poor state, and 4% are in fair condition.
The roads in Naga City that will be affected by the Project are shown in Figure 1.3. The
haul roads will be the proposed Cogon-Cabuan-Camp 8 to Talisay-Toledo Highway
which also be in response to the request for access road by Cabuan and Camp 8
residents, and the existing Cogon-Cantao-an-Inayagan-Tunghaan-Natalio Bacalso
Avenue. The existing Naga-Uling road at junction Barangay Lanas going to Cabuan
The Lanas-Cabuan Barangay Road (see Figure 1.3) will not be a preferred haul road
for JLR trucks due to limited width and to avoid noise and dust impacts to the Cabuan
School population. JLR proposes to contribute to this road maintenance for the Cogon-
Cabuan population, to divert them from the potentially congested traffic at Cogon-
Guindaruhan-Cebu South Road and reduce road safety risk impacts related to JLR use
of the Cebu South Road market access.
Between 2011 and 2015, a total of 961 road accidents have been reported, nine (9) of
which reported in Barangay Cogon and nine (9) in Barangay Lanas (Table 2.4- 49).
According to the police reports, these accidents are due to human error, undisciplined
pedestrians, poorly maintained vehicles, and lack of implementation of regulations
pertaining to motor vehicles (City of Naga CLUP). This may indicate that the City of
Naga needs to develop and enforce its Traffic Code and Ordinance to better ensure
road safety. None of the accidents involved JLRCAI cargo trucks.
The municipality of Minglanilla is traversed by the Cebu South Road in about five
kilometers from Barangay Linao to Barangay Tungkop. The National Highway is
supplemented by Provincial, Municipal, and Barangay Roads that connect all
barangays of Minglanilla, and further to the Barangays of Naga, although some of the
mountain barangays (Barangays Camp 7 and Camp 8) are best accessed through
Talisay-Toledo Road or through “Manipis” road.
Minglanilla’s road networks have a total stretch of 51.8 kilometers, 34 km of which are
concreted, 5.4 km are asphalted while 12.4 are still on gravel. 5.1 km of the total roads
are from the national road, Natalio B. Bacalso Highway, 15.8 km are provincial roads,
1.7 km are municipal roads, and 29.2 km are barangay roads. Table 2.4- 51 below
shows the inventory of barangay roads in Barangays Guindaruhan and Camp 8.
During site preparation, vehicle traffic contribution to public roads is not expected to
be significant, since much of the equipment are already within the JLR crusher Line 1
and quarry premises and a “back road” connecting Crusher 1 to the quarry is available
via Sitio Cabuan. The Barangay request to JLRCAI to concrete this road is already
signed and JLRCAI is preparing for road concreting in this section.
The increased Project haul truck traffic may reduce safe public access to the inland
areas of Cogon because of traffic congestion and increased damage to road
pavement.
The Cogon- Guindaruhan-Tungkop -Cebu South Road route is also used by students of
Guindaruhan High School and Elementary School to access their school premises.
Particularly when face to face classes shall resume.
Public access to the proposed expanded area will also be reduced as the JLR will plant
a five-meter perimeter green belt around the expanded production area.
JLR will have agreements with the existing land surface claimants for the planting of
the perimeter green belt. Land claims involved in the perimeter green belt will be
respected and land claimants will be paid based on the number of trees planted and
maintained (100% survival maintenance). Claimants on lands with mining right of way
acquired by JLR will be advised not to enter the quarry premises for their own safety.
The physical, cultural, and scenic landscapes in City of Naga provide an important
source of livelihood through tourist activities. The tourist attractions in City of Naga
include the following:
Figure 2.1-3 shows the location of Mt. Naupa surveyed as part of deriving flora and
fauna baseline for the JLR quarry expansion project.
Naga City is also frequented during times of cultural activities or festivals seasons (Table
2.4-53).
Matun-og Falls, a nature attraction, is found in Barangay Guindaruhan. There are also
two (2) industrial tourism attractions in Camp 8, namely Kabuwan Organic Farming and
Calbasaan Vegetables/Root Crops.
1. Man-made Forest
Yearning to breathe in fresh air? Minglanilla’s got you covered with their century-old
man-made forest! This spans approximately 2,710 hectares and was declared as a
forest reserve by President Quezon in the year 1937.
Located in Upper Pakigne Tubod in Minglanilla, this mountain spring resort is popular
because of its amenities: 4 swimming pools (complete with adult and children’s water
slides!), a bird sanctuary (already included in the entrance fee), videoke booths, a
canteen, basketball court and billiards, fishing area, and a grilling area.
Even the cottages scattered around are designed to give you that primitive-era feels.
A viewing deck has also been created for those who want to see the entire resort.
4. 7 White Caves
The 7 White Caves of Minglanilla are located in Barangay Camp 7, which serves as the
town’s boundary with the nearby city of Toledo. Of the 7 caves, only 4 are currently
open to the public (caves 4-6 have been closed since a strong quake struck the town
last 2013).
The Project will not extract minerals from the Municipality of Minglanilla, thus the Project
will generate no potential anthropogenic changes to the landscape, physical or
cultural resources found in the Municipality of Minglanilla.
A household survey was conducted from February 23 to 26 and from June 21 to 25,
2021, with the assistance of Barangay Health Workers from Barangays Cogon, Lanas,
Guindaruhan and Camp 8 using the questionnaire above.
The Slovin sampling methodology was used in determining sample size, based on the
number of 2015 Barangay population divided by the average household size. At the
time of survey, the result of Year 2020 Census was not yet available.
Slovin’s Formula
𝑛 = 𝑁/1 + 𝑁𝑒2
Where:
n=sample size
N=Population size
e=Margin of error of 5%
Table 2.4. 54-1 Determining the Household Survey Sampling Size
Population Total No. of Sample Size Sampling
Barangay
(2015) Households (no. of HH) Interval (HH)
Cogon 4,267 992 280 3
Lanas 2,890 672 248 3
The survey population was 4,847 inhabitants in 1,030 families, in Barangays Cogon,
Lanas, Guindaruhan, and Camp 8. The surveyed households were randomly selected
using general sampling interval arrived-at by dividing the total number of households
by the sample size.
Public Perception Survey was conducted through Focus Group Discussions (FGD) per
Barangay, on February 9 and 10, 2021, undertaken as part of the (IEC) activities.
The method used was through Focus Group Discussion to elicit public perception
regarding the JLR project implementation, public experience on project
1. Have you heard of, or do you know the JLR quarry project?
2. What have you heard or what do you know regarding the JLR quarry project,
what do you regarding the JLR project implementation and its impact to the
community?
3. Do you agree with the proposed JLR quarry expansion?
4. What can you say regarding JLR social development activities in your
community?
JLR donated
aggregates for
chapel construction Concern: It’s a good
(Birhen de los time to revive the
Remedios chapel) one-lane road
project in Cabuan
JLR is great help in
our public service.
They are open to our
requests in times of Reply: Proponent:
need (Councilor Funding was and is
Ricardo) available for this but
please the Brgy. LGU
Barangay Cogon is take care of ROWA
strongly in support of
the proposed JLR Brgy Captain: We will
Quarry production try to find a new,
expansion Project safer route &
convince landowner
to allow a piece of
land for public good-
Brgy Captain
Guindaruhan, 10/10 0/10 10/10 0/10 10/10 0/10 • JLR provided JLR is constrained
Minglanilla printers and bond with the MGB
paper which we guidelines on the use
Impact Assessment – The People 453
Do you agree with
What have you heard
Barangay Heard of JLR? the proposed quarry Participants’ Remarks Remarks
about JLR
expansion
use for printing of of SDMP funds and
educational LGU honoraria is not
modules in this allowed. JLR will
pandemic make representation
with the Provincial
• JLR livelihood
Government which
projects in recently increased
Guindaruhan are extraction tax,
okay hopefully a portion
• Thank you JLR for may be allowed for
coming to Barangay honoraria.
Guindaruhan to
inform regarding
the project
expansion. We
look forward and
expect more
SDMP\
• JLR please
consider
honoraria for the
LGU
Lanas, City of Naga 10/10 0/10 10/10 0/10 10/10 0/10 (1)JLR is a JLR will include all
responsible miner.(2) Lanas requests in its
JLR assisted Lanas in 2021 SDMP Program
distribution of
Impact Assessment – The People 454
Do you agree with
What have you heard
Barangay Heard of JLR? the proposed quarry Participants’ Remarks Remarks
about JLR
expansion
domestic water
supply-Brgy. Captain
Barangay Lanas is
strongly in support of
the proposed JLR
Quarry production
expansion Project.
Table 2.4- 58 Community Requests to JLR Received during Community Consultation / IEC Activities
Livelihood Projects Education Health Infrastructure JLR / Consultants’ Reply
Cogon Hog raising School common Ambulance We will include in
study area with 2021 SDMP
WIFI Program
Lunch countertop
with (covid19)
shields/dividers
Concretize school
grounds
School bus
More roads
Guindaruhan I request JLR to JLR will maintain
maintain the road- road through
(1)Elem. School backfilling and
Principal (2) HS compaction. 4
principal other quarry
projects use the
same road. JLR will
Impact Assessment – The People 456
Livelihood Projects Education Health Infrastructure JLR / Consultants’ Reply
We want to make
request JLR to representation
donate cement for with LGU how the
our next road haul road will be
concreting improved. Only
project- Local 20% of existing JLR
Parish production will
representative increase in the use
existing haul road.
Alternative haul
road will be
pursued.
Lanas Need priority Can we request Yes, all MPSA host
employment. JLR for barangays have
Many students construction employment
unable to materials for our priority in JLR.
concentrate in church? Sloping Agricultural
studies due to Land
doing livelihood Technology/cultiv
activities as ation method will
parents work also be
outside. assisted/taught,
Need for fertilizers because sloping
due to poor soil. land quickly loses
Hog raising soil and nutrients.
Lanas need to stop
tree cutting for
charcoal and fuel
wood making.
Lanas need tree
planting to control
soil erosion. JLR will
Poverty is a situation where a person, family or community lack the financial resources
to obtain the minimum basic needs for food, shelter, education, and medical
attention. The subsistence or the food threshold is the minimum requirement for
healthful food. The poverty groups are identified by the National Anti-Poverty
Commission (NAPC) mostly as persons and families in the basic sectors, the artisanal
fisherfolk, farmers who own not more than 3 hectares of land, farmers who are working
on land not owned, landless rural workers who are either wage earners, self-
employed, or unpaid family workers engaged in agriculture, small-scale mining,
handicrafts, and other related farm and off-farm activities, members of indigenous
people and cultural communities and workers in the informal sector, among others.
The poverty threshold in the first half of 2018 for a family of 5 was P62,886, or P12,577
per capita, or P 69.87 per day. At 13.2% incidence in 2018, this translated to an
estimated 167,934 families in Central Visayas. Updating the value to September 2021
using inflation values of past years, this will be P76.42.
The average food threshold of subsistence requirement for a family of 5 per month in
Central Visayas in 2018 was P 7424 (NEDA RO7), equivalent to an estimated 61,067
families who were not able to meet the daily requirement for adequate food. Using
the official inflation values for 2019, 2020 and July 2021, this may be updated to P56.30
for September 2021.
300,000 100%
90%
250,000
80%
Census Population
70%
200,000
60%
Poverty Incidence
150,000 50%
40%
100,000
30%
20%
50,000
10%
0 0%
2009 2012 2015
Naga # Poor Families 5,160 3,496 4,885
Naga Population 95,206 101,628 115,750
Minglanilla # Poor Families 4,148 2,197 3,568
Minglanilla Population 101,662 113,254 132,135
Naga Poverty Incidence 27% 17% 21%
Minglanilla Poverty Incidence 20% 10% 14%
Food security is the access by all people at all times to adequate food for an active,
healthy life. Food security includes at a minimum: (1) the ready availability of
nutritionally adequate and safe foods and (2) an assured ability to acquire
acceptable foods in socially acceptable ways (e.g., without resorting to emergency
food supplies, scavenging, stealing, or other coping strategies (World Food Summit,
1996). A household is considered food-secure when its occupants do not live in hunger
or fear of starvation. Stages of food insecurity range from food secure situations to full-
scale famine.
The Food and Nutrition Research Institute (FNRI) of the Department of Science and
Technology (DOST) conducted a Food Security Survey in 2015 to get a better
understanding of the access of households to various food items as well as the quality
of food access in terms of diversity and food frequency using the Food Consumption
Score (FCS) which was developed by World Food Program (WFP). Of the 41,282 Filipino
households surveyed, 1,167 households are from the Province of Cebu.
However, the survey also indicates that Cebu has a fairly high rate of moderate food
insecurity, with 32.3%, this is almost equivalent to its percentage of food secure
households (34.2%). Figure 2.4- 14 presents the food security status of Cebu as
compared to the status of Central Visayas and the Philippines. Food Insecurity is the
limited or uncertain availability of nutritionally adequate and safe foods or limited or
uncertain ability to acquire acceptable foods in socially acceptable ways (Life
Sciences Research Office, 1990).
The FNRI-DOST also scored the dietary diversity of Central Visayas. Dietary diversity
represents the number of food groups consumed by a household over a given period,
and for this, it refers to the previous week or previous seven (7) days prior to the
interview. A score or point is given for every food group consumed by the household.
This score is a proxy measure of household’s food access and the quality of their diet.
As cited by Nueva España, et al. (2014), “the higher the diet diversity score, the more
varied the diet and the higher the possibility that different nutrients will be met
because no single food could provide all nutrients needed by the body”, as “each
particular food group contains nutrients that complement the nutrients contained in
other foods”. The mean diversity score of Central Visayas is 9.2. This is slightly below the
Philippines’ score which is 9.4.
Philippines
Central Visayas
Cebu
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Cebu Central Visayas Philippines
Food Secure 34.20% 31.70% 33.90%
Mildly Food Insecure 11.60% 12% 12.30%
Moderately Food Insecure 32.30% 35.20% 31.90%
Severely Food Insecure 22% 21.10% 21.90%
Source: FNRI-DOST
Figure 2.4- 14 Percent Distribution of Households by Food Security Status in Cebu,
Central Visayas and The Philippines, 2015
Source: FNRI-DOST
In 2015, the FNRI – DOST commissioned a food security survey “2015 Updating of the
Nutritional Status of Filipino Children and Other Population Groups” which reports that
31.7% of the population in Central Visayas are food-secure, close to the national
average of 33.9%.
Table 2.4- 59 Percent Distribution of Households by Food Security Status and Demographic
Characteristics, Philippines, 2015
Food Secure Mildly Food Moderately Severely Food
Insecure Food Insecure Insecure
Socio-demographic Characteristics
Philippines 33.9 12.3 31.9 21.9
Household Size
>5 25.9 12.0 35.8 26.3
<5 37.8 12.5 30.0 19.7
Place of Residence
Rural 28.0 12.3 36.6 23.2
Urban 40.1 12.4 27.0 20.6
Wealth Quintile
Poorest 11.5 8.5 40.9 39.1
Poor 18.0 11,7 41.0 29.3
Middle 258 15.0 37 7 21.5
Rich 42.6 15.5 28.2 13.7
Richest 71.6 11.1 11.7 5.7
Sex of Household Head
Male 32.6 12.5 32.7 22.2
Female 38.5 118 28.8 20.9
Occupation of Household Head
Armed forces 62.9 12.3 18.4 6.5
Managers 59.6 10.8 20.2 9.4
Professionals 67.4 11.7 15.2 5.7
Technicians and associate 50.9 13.7 22.5 12.9
professionals
Clerical support workers 51.1 12.4 22.7 13.8
Service and sales workers 35.4 13.6 309 20.1
Skilled agricultural, forestry and 21,8 11.6 39,4 27.2
fishery workers
Craft and related trades workers 29.0 144 34.7 22.0
Plant and machine operators 35.9 13.4 30.5 20.3
and assemblers
Elementary occupations 19.8 12.3 38.1 29.8
No Occupation 40,5 11.8 27.3 20.4
Educational Attainment of Household Head
No Grade Completed 15.9 6.8 34.0 43.3
Elementary Undergraduate 19.6 10.4 37.9 32.1
From the survey of populations in Barangay Cogon, Lanas, Guindarohan and Camp
8 (see Annex 24.4), the majority of the heads of households near, around and with
good accessibility from the Barangay Halls have elementary, high school, high school
graduate and vocational education (Figure 2.4- 16) as the highest educational
attainment and most make a living from farming, carpentry and, menial work (Figure
2.4- 17).
From the result of survey, the level of highest educational attainment and main
livelihood activities a pattern leading to poverty conditions is seen. It is very probable
that households farther from the Barangay centers with poor road accessibility are not
in much different condition than those captured in the partial survey.
4%
15% Elementary
32% Highschool
Vocational Level
College
Highschool Graduate
17%
No Reply
Elementary Graduate
4%
4% 24%
Figure 2.4- 16 Highest Educational Attainment of Population Near & Around the
Barangay Halls of MPSA-Host Barangays
9% Driver
0%
Security Guard
31%
Fishing
7%
Sari-Sari Store
1%
2% Buy and Sell
1% Private Employee
2%
Laborer
1% Rock/Gravel
2% Copra Making
17%
1%
6% 1% Dress Making
10% 1% Mechanic
Mason
There are 10 settler-families within the proposed expanded quarry area, and six farm
sheds that are not used for dwelling. None of the settler-families within the proposed
production area are included in the census made by CENRO covering the production
area, nor do they hold any tenurial instrument. None of the claimants in the
certification issued by CENRO were found within the production area. Of the ten (10)
settler families, seven (7) indicated willingness to be relocated, one (1) declined due
to possible loss of livelihood, one (1) stated that relocation will “depend on the
situation” and one gave no reply regarding the matter.
The JLRCAI will offer compensation to the informal settlers and offer opportunities that
will help them improve their lives, that is, (i) compensation for the affected structures
which they may use as livelihood capital, since they will be allowed to dismantle and
relocate their structures (ii) disturbance fee and (iii) priority in project employment,
SDMP livelihood skills training. The informal settlers will not be involuntarily relocated.
As earlier mentioned, there are three (3) families with land patents issued by DENR
covering a total area of 1.6595 hectares. The details are in Table 2.4- 60 below.
Upon ECC approval, JLRCAI will disclose to the patent owners their offer to buy subject
lands.
If the settlers will not sell the land patents, JLRCAI will negotiate for land lease. The
Lease Agreement will either based on volume extracted or monthly rental. The
affected households will be given topmost priority by JLRCAI for training, educational
assistance, employment and or livelihood assistance in addition to compensation for
loss of land use.
The site preparation phase will not proceed while the patent holders have not agreed
to JLRCAI use of their property.
During quarry operations phase after ECC approval (2022 onwards), negotiations for
the proposed alternative access road linking access to (production) Crusher Line 2 to
the Talisay-Toledo Highway (see Figure 2.4- 3) will be negotiated, under the leadership
of the barangay Captains. This access road was requested by the host communities
during community consultation and JLRCAI Mining Consultant brilliantly outlined the
potential alignment that will serve both the community needs and project need for
an alternative haul road.
The typical cross section of the proposed northern/ new / haul road will require a ten
(10) meter road right of way, to accommodate a seven (7) meter carriageway, ±1
meter shoulder on both sides and ±0.5m drainage ditch. Given an estimated 3.5
kilometer length, the total right of way requirement for the alternative haul road is 3.5
hectares. The Barangay Captains will assist JLRCAI to negotiate road right of way
acquisition with land claimants, for the benefit of the road host community to have
reliable, safe, and closer access to the national highway. The disturbed property will
be 3.5 hectares, but land claimants will benefit from appreciation of land value with
the all-weather road access to the national highway. Opportunity for small /micro
commercial and residential development flanking the road will benefit the land
claimants.
The status of lands within the proposed expanded quarry area is summarized in Table
2.4- 61. The names of land applicants are in Annex 25 and Annex 26.
Table 2.4- 61 Status of Land Ownership Within the Proposed Expanded Quarry Area
The JLRCAI does not expect conflict in land ownership as all land-patent holders
patents, verified land claims and families with developments within the proposed
expanded area will be considered as “landowners” and will be accorded the
privilege of being offered a proposal for land purchase according to the zonal value
for the area as determined by the Bureau of Internal Revenue, regardless of legal
status of land tenure.
It is possible that land claimants in the expanded quarry area will request for
compensation for the assignment of their rights to JLRCAI (by virtue of site possession
or settlement), beyond the zonal value prescribed by the BIR for titled land in the area.
Legally and technically, the expanded production area is under "Forest Land
Classification" and its disposition is under the National Government (NG), as guided
by PD 705, the FORESTRY REFORM CODE OF THE PHILIPPINES. It is implied that the land
tenure instruments issued by the NG such as the MPSA shall prevail regarding the use
of the subject land. The Implementing Rules and Regulations of the Philippine Mining
Act has provisions that require mining operations to be a tool for inclusive social
development and JLRCAI will apply best negotiation approaches to secure the land
claimants’ agreement for mining right of way, within the guidelines under
Administrative Order 21-10 or the Implementing Rules and Regulations of R.A. 7942 or
the Philippine Mining Act of 1991. The responses given by the ten (10) families currently
living within the Project area indicate that the main concern that may hinder their
immediate consent to JLRCAI’s request for temporary land use are fear of loss of their
source of livelihood, and a place they call "home". JLRCAI will try its best to offer
opportunities (compensation for loss of land use or land swap, 100% replacement cost
of their home and sheds, disturbance compensation, compensation for standing
crops which they will be allowed to harvest, employment within the Project, training
and other social development assistance) under the Project SDMP.
In the case of Lot 9047, a parcel of land within the JLRCAI Crusher Line 1 grounds, the
release of the final payment to the sellers was not effected at the time of their filing
of complaint to EMB 7, pending the sellers’ provision of the BIR Certificate Authorizing
Registration (BIR-CAR), to effect the Transfer of Title to the buyer (JLRCAI) by the
Register of Deeds. The original agreement was for the seller to handle the transfer of
Title, which however encountered delays due to lack of Government-required
documents (BIR-CAR). Attached in Annex 5 is a copy of the subject land title in the
name of JLRCAI which was facilitated with the seller’s endorsement to the Land
Registration Authority (LRA) the transfer of title in favor of JLRCAI. The BIR- Certificate
Authorizing Registration (CAR) submitted by the seller for the transfer of title was found
by LRA as defective. The CAR requires that all taxes due pertaining to the property
As for the survey claimants within the 150-hectare proposed expanded quarry area,
as per the DENR-CENRO Toledo, Table 2.4-61 indicates 52 families with claims on
almost eighty hectares who did not file applications to the CENRO as of this writing
and have no presence or development in the area, will still be considered as
landowners and will be given the offer to “sell” their rights or claims.
The JLRCAI will not knowingly deprive poor land claimants with their rights to their land
claims. The land claimants belonging to poverty groups will be given priority in the
Project SDMP to give them opportunity to improve their lives and get out of poverty,
depending on self-determination.
To address the concern of Naga LGU raised during the community consultations, JLR
will pay for tax declarations for the lands on which it has acquired mining right of way,
after rights are transferred through agreements with surface owners. If based on the
records of DENR CENRO, the regular payees of tax declarations / real estate taxes are
3 free patent holders and 4 free patent applicants. The 52 survey claimants for 79.46
hectares have no applications. The total area with free patent, free patent
applications and survey claimants is 89.944 hectares (see Table 2.4- 61).
During site preparation, potential conflict in mining right of way exists with ten (10)
informal settlers within the proposed expanded quarry area.
The JLRCAI will, at all times, negotiate peacefully with the ten (10) informal settler-
families and offer them opportunity for better livelihood through the Project.
During quarry operations, for the alternative haul road from Quarry north sector to
Cabuan Elementary School to Camp 8 to Talisay-Toledo Highway, the proposed road
alignment with estimated length of 3.5 hectares will traverse a total of 16 land holdings
with composite area of 16.26 hectares. Of the 16 lots with claimants, 4 have been
applied to CENRO Argao for Free Patent.
The buffer zone /green belt at tenement boundary and tree plantation site outside
production area but within tenement area the , JLRCAI will negotiate with the tax
declarants to buy the rights of the land for tree plantation purposes; If the tax
Impact Assessment – The People 467
declarants will not accept the offer, JLRCAI will negotiate with the tax declarants to
plant trees and the company will pay based on number of trees planted including
the maintenance until the trees are grown.
For the Mt. Naupa area within tenement declared by LGU as tourist spot and area The
company will have a Memorandum of Agreement with the LGU in the development
and maintenance of the said area to preserve the Terrestrial Environment.
The limited project work opportunities (see Table 1.22 Manpower Distribution) During
Site Preparation phase are not expected to generate significant attractors for informal
vending and trading. The capability for required skills and laborers will be easily
developed from within the MPSA host Barangays.
During the construction of Crusher Line 2 and the overhead conveyor, the
Construction Contractors will be required to employ available local labor.
Professionals, skilled and trusted personnel of their teams will be briefed regarding
Project policy of discouraging informal settling.
During quarry operations JLRCAI will source its workforce from the host communities
to the maximum feasible number. All who are interested and committed to work in
JLRCAI will be supported to undergo training with TESDA and or receive On-the-Job
Training, to adequately do the required work.
There are no known indigenous peoples residing in the affected barangays or within
the project area. Hence, cultural and lifestyle changes are not expected to result from
the proposed project. The Project work force will be sourced locally as much as
possible. Naga City, being part of Metro Cebu City has been exposed to urban
lifestyles and as the family incomes increase, may soon embrace more urbanized
lifestyles.
During construction phase, the Project could attract a large number of transients and
migrants whose skills are not available in the locality. JLRCAI, or its contractors, may
bring in skilled personnel from outside of the host municipality. Although their residency
is temporary, transient workers will have needs that are similar to the permanent
residents in the area. Hence, competition for food, shelter, power, water, and other
local resources may be expected. This potential resource competition will be
temporary, spatially limited, insignificant, and reversible.
During operation, the Project has potential to assist the LGUs with the growing needs
and forecast reduced Internal Revenue Allotments as a result of national economic
contraction resulting from the effects of Covid19 pandemic. The Philippine
Government has approved massive multi-year infrastructure projects for Cebu given
the significant growth of economic activities in Cebu in the recent decade, and the
demand and business of aggregate supply will continue and is expected to outlive
the negative economic impact of the pandemic. It is expected that the Project will
provide much needed social development support in its influence area as the local
economy struggles to recover to pre-pandemic level.
From 2016 to 2019, JLR implemented its Social Development and Management
Program (SDMP) beyond the required financial ceiling under CDAO 2012-21, in
response to the needs expressed and requested by the MPSA-host communities. The
JLR summary of financial performance in SDMP and site photos are in Annex 36. The
name of projects, specific groups, and number of beneficiaries per annual SDMP
program will be submitted in time for the technical review.
The competition for road use along the “South Road” ” Cogon- Cantao-an-Inayagan-
Tunghaan-Cebu South Road which is expected to increase after 2023 when the
expanded aggregate production shall take effect, will be alleviated with the
completion of the alternative road from the quarry (the “North Road”, from Cogon-
Cabuan-Camp 8 to Talisay- Toledo Highway, see Figure 1.3) by the end of 2022. Only
20% (100,000 m3) or less of its currently-approved 500,000 m3 annual aggregate
production will use the “South Road” because the JLR dispatcher will designate the
truck routes, and the North Road will be more convenient for market transport due to
wider and shorter exit to fast-lane national highway.
Overall, the Project is not expected to generate factors that will develop threat to the
delivery of government services or resource use competition but will support and
supplement the local, City, Municipal and Provincial Government resources to deliver
services to the public.
The Project potential to support and provide additional resources for delivery of basic
services will far outweigh the potential resource use competition that may be
generated during construction phase.
Given the nature of the project, dust is primary source pollutant that may post threat
to public health and safety. Dust from the Crusher Line 1 is not expected to be
significant to cause increase in said respiratory diseases due to the wet process
The local benefits that are expected to be brought by the Project to the MPSA-host
Barangays: include assistance to the needs of the education sector, to the health
sector, the religious sector, women’s groups, farmers, livelihood groups and local
infrastructure as may be observed from the preceding sections, the community
meetings and public scoping activity undertaken. Each sectoral group have
expressed their requests, and these are fleshed-out in the Indicative Social
Development and Management Plan section.
The Social Development and Management Program budget for 2021, from the 2020
production of 312,085.00 cubic meters is P 3,200,000.00. By ratio and proportion, the
nominal value of Project SDMP at 2million annual production is P 20,507,234. This is
expected to generate perceptible social development impact as JLR listens and
responds to expressed needs of the local beneficiary population.
A total of 108 regular job opportunities, retail distribution and marketing opportunities
for wholesale sand and gravel for local entrepreneurs, reliable supply for aggregates
to the construction industry and their workers, and trickle-down economic effects to
the local farmers, fishermen, tricycle operators, sundry dry goods stores and other
grass roots livelihood are expected to ensure with the implementation of the
expanded aggregate production project.
The JLR currently provides economic and business opportunities to local entrepreneurs
in consignment-based no capitalization required and discounted plant-gate price for
retail distribution and marketing of sand and gravel. A Cebu-based reliable supply of
reasonably-priced crushed sand and aggregates benefit the construction industry
with lower prices due to elimination of inter-provincial handling transfers, and
elimination of freight cost.
The regional economy will also benefit from P 490,000,000.00 project capital
investment which will be spent in costs for land, machinery, equipment, the processing
plant.
The Local Governments impose a P10/m3 extraction fee, P 20,000,000.00 will be due
the Provincial Government as the Project produces the target 2 million cubic meters
a year. Based on the Project Feasibility Study, for 2021, the fees and taxes expected
to be paid the Government is P 11,477,936.00. Allowed production ceiling in 2021 is
500,000 cubic meters. At maximum production of 2,000,000 cubic meters, excluding
the rate of inflation, the expected nominal amount of taxes and fees due to the
Government will be 45,911,744.00.
Under the local Government Code, Local Governments will receive 60% of national
revenue as their Internal Revenue Allotment or P 27,547,046.40 for one year.
Phase Occurrence
Potential Project Aban
Assessed Project Impact Pre-Con/ Mitigating Measure
Impact Operation donm
Site Preparation ent
Displacement of No settlers in the
settler/s proposed Production N/A N/A N/A
Area.
3.1 Introduction
This Environmental Risk Assessment (ERA) is prepared for the proposed JLR Basalt
Material Production Expansion Project with total sand and gravel production volume
of 2 million cubic meters (m3) or 4 million tons per year (mta). The risk assessment level
screening in Annex 2_7e of DAO 2003-30 and the risk assessment method from the
Australian Standard AS/NZS 4360:2004 was adapted to examine the proposed JLR
expanded aggregates production.
Risk is differentiated from hazard in that risks are potentials of harm occurring while
hazards are potential sources of harm. Risks represent probability of harmful events
occurring, while hazards are physical situations that can cause harm, loss or danger
and may be addressed by safety protocols while risks remain as probabilities of harm
occurring even after controls are implemented.
3.2 Coverage Levels & Requirements under Annex 2-7e (DAO 2003-30)
Based on the ANFO storage capacity of the Project blasting subcontractor (Section
3.3), the Project risk assessment screening brought the Project ERA requirement to ERA
The Risk Register has six (6) concerns with the following description.
3.4.1.1.1 Earthquakes, Ground rupture and Liquefaction and Associated Physical Risk
The project site is not in an earthquake-prone area (see Figure 2.1.20, Seismicity Map
of Visayas). A small number of secluded clusters of earthquake epicenters around
neighboring Bohol Island appear to be unrelated to known active faults. These
isolated earthquake epicenters most likely indicate a high likelihood of discovering
previously unknown earthquakes. Ground rupture at the fault trace near the Project
site is highly unlikely within the life of MPSA 194-2004-VII. The Project site does have
granular and crystalline formations, making it highly resistant to liquefaction.
The project site in Naga, Cebu falls under Type III classification, having no pronounced
wet or dry season. The extreme Tropical Storms passing Cebu in recent past such as
Typhoon Yolanda in 2013 was the first of its category and while annual recurrence is
not expected, the passage of such storm category within the MPSA life cannot be
disregarded. Owing to area topography and situation on a relatively higher elevation
with moderately steep slopes, the area is not vulnerable to flashfloods. The relatively
short relatively dry season in Cebu persisting from November to April, may be with
extreme heat conditions as per PAGASA forecast, with it higher land surface moisture
evaporation and more vulnerability to soil erosion for sloping lands.
The physical risks involving failure of structure w/c could endanger life, property and/or
the environment are associated with geohazards, specifically earthquakes, ground
rupture in location of vertical structures. Failure of structures storing large quantities of
toxic and hazardous substances may create an environmental disaster. The Project
vulnerability to risks related with earthquakes, ground rupture or liquefaction are
insignificant as discussed in the land module.
The physical risks to the Project are associated with geohazard events that may result
in failure of structures, endanger life and /or property but are not expected to release
significant toxic or hazardous substances (see Section 3.3). For the project, the
palpable physical risks are those associated with the area landslide susceptibility.
3.4.1.1.4 Landslide
During the site preparation and quarry operations phase, the area's landslide
susceptibility will increase due to reduced soil cohesion caused by removal of
vegetation and root systems that contribute to slope stability. Loosened or blasted
and un-hauled materials are also present and when remaining in situ and saturated
with rainfall, the loose materials on steep slope will tend to slide. Due to the
mountainous to moderately sloping terrain and highly weathered rock formations in
the MPSA, the proposed expanded quarry area when disturbed due to site
preparation and blasting during quarry operations, have several land sections with
deeper weak rock materials that have high to moderate susceptibility to landslides
under the proposed benching design of 10m height by 10m wide.
An analysis for the Rock Quality Designation from the borehole logs of Dynamic
Geoenvironmental Specialists Inc., applying the equation of Barton et al (2015) below
enables the creation of a Qslope model (Figure 3.4- 1) which determines the safe
slope angles for quarry benches in certain areas to reduce the quarry area landslide
susceptibility during operations:
𝑅𝑄𝐷 𝐽𝑟 𝐽𝑤𝑖𝑐𝑒
𝑆𝑙𝑜𝑝𝑒 = 20𝑙𝑜𝑔10 ( ∗ ( ∗ 𝑂) ∗ ( )) + 65; ≥ 25
𝐽𝑛 𝐽𝑎 𝑆𝑅𝐹𝑎 ∗ 𝑆𝑅𝐹𝑏 ∗ 𝑆𝑅𝐹𝑐
Short Hand Shear friction angle* Jr Ja O factor Jwice SRFa SRFb SRFc
(documented
roughness of (susceptibility
rock type (in Mpa) joint) (joint Roughness) (joint alteration) (orientation) (environment) to weathering) (stress capacity) (Fillings)
Weathered Pyroclastic Rock WP 0.1 1 20 1 0.05 15 15 12
Lithic Lapili Tuff LLT 0.1-5.0 1.5 10 1 0.3 10 10 8
Porphyritic Basalt PB 20-370 38 4 1 1 0.5 5 5 4
Amygdaloidal Basalt AB 20-60 38 3 2 1 0.5 5 2.5 4
Conglomerate C 0.4-70 35 3 6 1 0.3 7.5 7.5 8
Crystal Ash Tuff CAT 0.1-4 0.5 12 1 0.05 10 10 8
Sandstone SS 0-50 32 1 4 1 0.5 7.5 5 8
Medium Grained Tuff MGT 0.1-2.5 1.5 8 1 0.1 10 10 8
Tuffaceous Sandstone TS 0-50 1 6 1 0.5 10 8.5 8
The above equation was provided with linear-extrapolated values determined from
known characteristics of the minerals identified from the borehole logging data
(Annex 40) in the absence of quantitative details regarding rock quality from said
boreholes. In the Qslope model below, the geologic discontinuities and state of
weathering are discounted due to lack of details from the boring log. The Qslope
calculations are shown in Annex 40. The QSlope model illustrated in Figure 3.4- 1
provides a numerical and visual representation of the theoretic bench slope angles
within the margin of slope stability determined by Barton N.R. and are only meant as
a guide that can be modified as further testing of recovered borehole segments
indicate harder rock quality.
Meters from
BH1 BH2 BH3 BH4 BH5 BH6 BH7 BH8 BH9 BH10
surface
Safe slope gradient (%)
1 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25
2 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25
3 25 25 31.78578 31.05074 25 25 25 25 25 25
4 25 25 38.84754 60.50762 25 25 25 25 25 25
5 25 25 31.04653 65.35476 25 25 25 25 25 25
6 25 25 25 58.09048 25 25 25 25 25 25
7 25 25 32.76351 25 25 25 25 25 25 25
8 25 25 28.5276 25 25 25.04894 25 25 25 25
9 25 25 51.72496 25 25.52472 26.79848 25 25 25 25
10 25 25 25 25 25 28.73575 25 25.16951 25 25
11 25 25 27.67603 25 25 31.2149 25 25 25.02158 25
12 25 25 25 25 25.20461 31.17511 25 25.00217 25 25
13 25 25 25 25 25 30.87469 25 25.55112 25 25.00217
14 25 25 25 32.73965 25.32011 30.15866 25 25.40922 25 25
15 25 25 25 37.10673 45.22327 26.46825 25 25.23101 25 25
16 25 25 25 33.91711 65.55574 25 25 25.20461 25 25
17 25 25 25 38.36515 25.32011 25.32011 32.42933 25.1155 25
18 25 25 25 40.79311 25.23101 25.23101 72.89431 25.00217 25
19 25 25 25 30.54282 25.20461 25.32011 72.64921 25.00217 25
20 25 25 25 25 25.66663 25.20461 34.02109 25 25
Figure 3.4- 1 Qslope Model – Recommended Bench Slope (%) at Bench Height 5m
Quarry bench slope (%) may be varied to steeper grade as the extraction elevation
gets lower and hard rock is encountered.
Aquifer intake points are important to the human community, as these are the points
of ground water resource replenishment from rainfall. As generally shown in Figure 2.2-
7, Hydrogeological Map of the Philippines, the aquifer in the general Project area
occur in lower elevations, near the coastal margin downstream of project site. These
are “fair-to-less extensive, fair-to-less productive” due to low to moderate permeability
of basalt, and ground water for domestic purposes are locally obtainable in
sufficiently fractured zones.” The Matun-og River is most likely a surface expression of
the northeast trending (unnamed) fault in the area (Figure 2.2-6). The surface
waterbody (Cogon River) continues sea-ward and intersects with another inferred
fault trace (Figure 2.2-6) which are also recognized as fault traces in the Project
Mineral Exploration Report. The interstices and fissures in faults are water passageways
or intake points for aquifers downstream. Accumulated and caked sediments and
clay “heal” or close the rock fissured over time, impeding and diverting rain infiltration
into the aquifer. While this may occur over geologic time, neglect over control of
sediment flows into Cogon River could negatively impact ground water resource
availability for downstream populations.
This risk is easily yields to sediment control as discussed in the earlier water module.
However, failure to faithfully implement the plan for the proposed production
expansion bears this environmental risk.
3.4.1.2.1 Fire
Excessive heat from machinery, the workshop/ welding shop, the mess kitchen, an
irresponsibly discarded cigarette butt tossed to the plastic heap in the Material
Recovery Facility, a spark from the exhaust of an ill-maintained motor vehicle falling
on a large, unrecognized pool of spilled fuel, overheated faulty wiring, leaked rain on
exposed electrical connection can cause a fire.
3.4.1.2.2 Explosion
The explosives magazine of JLR blasting subcontractor, is located within the MPSA and
away from populated areas. Based on information from the blasting contractor, the
explosives magazine can store 79 tons ANFO, 25 tons dynamite and 1 million pieces
of blasting caps at one time (see Item 1.8.2) in three separate buildings, each building
with double fence and separate concrete barrier between each other (see Figure
Environmental Risk Assessment 485
1.13). Based on the three-year available historical data on JLR quarry ANFO
consumption (Table 3.4-2), an average of 0.14kg ANFO is used in the production of
one (1) metric ton quarry raw material, and the maximum single delivery volume was
7.2 tons (December 2021).
For the expanded quarry production, 11.148 tons ANFO per week is required to
produce the maximum target of 1.7 million cubic meters basaltic/ indurated materials
per year. Comparing the magazine ANFO storage capacity of 79 tons, a weekly
delivery of 11.148 tons will utilize 14% of the magazine storage capacity. From a
physical storage viewpoint, A weekly delivery of ANFO requirement is recommended,
to maintain the situation with very low risk of accidental spontaneous explosion .
YEAR 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030
3
Annual Production (m ) 500,000 500,000 700,000 1,000,000 1,200,000 1,400,000 1,600,000 1,800,000 2,000,000 2,000,000
Daily Quarry Production
3
(m ) 1,667 1,667 2,333 3,333 4,000 4,667 5,333 6,000 6,667 6,667
BLASTING PARAMETERS:
Drillhole pattern 3m x 3m
Depth of Hole 10m
Volume per hole 3m x 3m x 10m x 1.3 = 117 cubic meters
No. of Holes/Blast/day 14 14 20 28 34 40 46 51 57 57
Blasting Schedule 2 blast/wk 2 blast/wk 2 blast/wk 3 blast/wk 3 blast/wk 4 blast/wk 4 blast/wk 6 days/wk 6 days/wk 6 days/wk
No. of Holes/blast 43 43 60 57 68 60 68 51 57 57
ESTIMATED ANFO REQUIREMENT BASED ON HISTORICAL UTILIZATION DATA: (quarry production (mt) x 0.14 ave.ANFO utilization/mt production)
Year 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030
daily (kg) 468 468 656 937 1,124 1,312 1,499 1,686 1,874 1,874
weekly (kg.) 3,278.90 3,278.90 4,590.47 6,557.81 7,869.37 9,180.93 10,492.49 11,804.05 13,115.62 13,115.62
weekly (in tons) 3.279 3.279 4.590 6.558 7.869 9.181 10.492 11.804 13.116 13.116
A sudden gust of strong wind on very dry quarry area or coinciding with blasting may
resuspend a large amount of dust, cause very poor visibility which may affect the
safety of equipment operations.
The project includes a variety of machinery and facilities with potential to endanger
personnel if safety facilities are not provided such as machine guards, and Personal
Protective Equipment (PPE), as well as safety protocols to be followed when handling
heavy machineries. Equipment maintenance work is also tricky if performed without
using safety devices, proper training, or equipment. Other occupational hazards
include:
Quarry activities have minimal potential to release/ spill fuel or oil to the natural
environment as the fuel or oil in the quarry area are contained within the operating
equipment that are designed not to spill oil or fuel as part of its normal operations.
Poorly maintained equipment may spill fuel and oil, but normal quarry or equipment
monitoring and management will end this situation as spilled fuel or oil means loss in
company resources and reduction of operating profitability.
A quarry project is not similar to a petroleum refinery or bulk petroleum depot where
the potential release of fuel and oil to the natural environment is massive.
Unchecked oil or fuel spill may be removed as the extracted materials are removed
and processed. At the processing stage, the leaked petroleum-based materials
evaporate and degrade into the environment. At the aggregates washing process,
the spilled oil may be washed into the wastewater pond, and may further decompose
or infiltrate into the substrate, where this will be broken down by bacteria, because
JLR has no wastewater discharge system. Project potential for release of toxic
substances to the environment is nil, although careful handling, storage and use of
petroleum-based products and other toxic substances will need to be maintained.
The potential consequences of an event happening are defined and described after
the risks are identified. For the JLR project, the potential consequences of the
occurrence of risk events are summarized in the 2nd or 3rd columns of the risk
assessment 1.
The level of risk can be classified into 5 levels of likelihood, ranging from an “almost
certain” event with a likelihood rating of 5 as the highest, and a “rare” likelihood with
a rating of 1. Also, consequences of such occurrence are also given a 5-level
classification per likelihood. The highest consequence level is given a “Catastrophic”
classification with a score of 5; whereas the least consequence has an “Insignificant”
classification with a 1 score. In the Quantitative Risk rating in Table 3.4.6 below, the risk
level rate is the sum of the likelihood rating and consequence rating.
4 (likely) 5 6 7 8 9
3 (possible) 4 5 6 7 8
2 (unlikely) 3 4 5 6 7
1 (rare) 2 3 4 5 6
3.5 JLRCAI Safety, Health & Emergency Preparedness & Response Program
JLR Construction and Aggregates, Inc. (JLR for short) developed this Safety and Health
Program to achieve zero accidents, correct unsafe acts and conditions, reduce
nonconformity, and comply with the company's functional legal needs in terms of
safety and health. The JLR Safety, Health & Emergency Preparedness & Response
Program has been approved by the MGB.
The safety of the mineral processing and mining operations' workforce, contractors,
and the general public both inside and outside the mining compound is the
company's top priority.
The company pursues accident and property damage prevention in the same way
that it follows health and medical care for employees and dependents.
3.5.2.1 Objectives
3.5.2.2 Policies
The JLR Company Safety Policy is to fully incorporate safety in every aspect of
industrial operations so that its personnel and those of the contractor, machineries
and equipment, and the immediate environment are amply protected from
accidents and that company officials in all levels of supervision will take a direct hand
in pursuing accident prevention activities under the following areas of concern and
standards, to wit:
Personal Injury Prevention JLR upholds the dignity and importance of every
employee and is duty-bound to protect his well-
being by providing adequate training in the
performance of his duties, safe working conditions,
necessary facilities and safety protective
equipment. In the unlikely event of accidents
occurring in the workplace requiring secondary
and tertiary medical treatment, linkages have been
established with nearby health institutions capable
of responding to such medical emergencies.
Property Damage Control JLR provides the authority and available resources
to its supervisory units to ensure that equipment,
supplies and its immediate environment are
adequately protected from any incident that result
in a loss.
Occupational Safety and JLR adopts and complies with the occupational
Health safety and health standards and other related
statutory regulations as prescribed by concerned
government agencies.
The Safety & Health Section is headed by the Safety Engineer. Its function is to
consolidate all safety, health and environmental performances. The health and safety
inspectors are the designated program coordinators and duly registered with MGB-
RO. One (1) safety inspector shall be assigned in every work shift.
The section empowers the Safety and Health Committee to exercise advisory and
directive functions on all operating units and serves to emphasize that accident free
performance is a basic objective to be pursued by every employee.
JLR’s Central Safety and Health Committee (CSHC) serve as an advisory and review
group on matters relating to safety and health policies, programming and
implementation of its activities with the General Manager as the Committee
Chairman. Each section is represented in the committee by its Head and employee
representatives. The company’s Safety Engineer serves as the secretary. It holds
monthly regular sessions and in such other times which call for the necessity of an
emergency/special meetings as called by the Chairman.
The responsibilities in the implementation of the safety policy are charged as follows:
The Quarry Manager provides support to the implementation of the safety and health
program by actively participating in the prevention of physical injuries and
occupational illnesses especially when the causes fall within their respective areas of
responsibility.
The Section Heads are directly responsible for the safety of employees under their
supervision, and the protection of company assets in connection with their operations.
Likewise, they have the responsibility of protecting their personnel, equipment and
materials and the environment against accidents and damages.
JLR’s service contractor (CONEX Philippines Inc.) shall observe and fully comply with
the company’s safety and health policies and program as they relate to plant and
quarry operations and shall coordinate and cooperate accordingly with JLR in the
implementation and enforcement of the same.
In the same manner, in any labor, service, construction and installation sub- contracts
or similar agreement entered into by JLR, a safety and health clause containing at
least a minimum compliance requirement consistent with the company’s safety
policies and regulations which include the governments’ occupational safety and
health standards shall be indicated in the contract agreement.
3.5.2.5 Meetings
The CSHC Committee and its designated members will meet on the 4th Friday of each
month to resolve all matters on safety, environment, and health as indicated in
inspection reports, minutes of the preceding month's CSHC meeting, hazardous
condition reports, and accident/incident report.
Each section shall hold a Safety and Health Meeting. The following are the topics for
discussion in the meetings:
To effectively control the work area and maintain conditions conducive to worker
safety and health and the efficient cooperation of all sections, these conditions must
be observed and assessed regularly.
During inspections, the SHE Department or the Safety and Health Committee's role
shall be limited to assisting and advising. The inspection of unsafe conditions shall be
the responsibility of all department managers and shall not be considered the
exclusive domain of the SHE Department or Committee.
Safety inspections are an essential part of the job of department managers and
supervisors, and as such, these tasks must be performed daily. The inspection must
determine the actions that must be taken to eliminate workplace hazards before an
accident occurs.
An Emergency Response Team (ERT) will be formed to deal with various incidents or
emergencies. The primary goal is to take immediate action, protect property, save
lives, and protect the environment. Table 3.5- 2 contains the organizational structure
of the Emergency Response Team.
In accordance with DOLE OHSS 2017, the Company's Safety, Health, and Emergency
Plan should be submitted and subject to approval to the Regional Labor Office of the
Department of Labor and Employment (OHS).
The safety rules described in this section serve as uniform standard which guide JLR
employees in performing common tasks relative to the attainment and maintenance
of a hazard-free working environment. In all cases, these rules are supplemented by
the employee’s good judgment in the safe performance of his assigned work.
These are conducted for all newly hired employees before they are
put to work. The topics for orientation/indoctrination include safety
policies and procedures, safety rules and regulations, and standard
operating procedures of the unit where the employee will be
assigned.
The JLR Mine Development Plan is an indicative mine plan submitted to initiate
environmental clearance necessary for the amendment of ECC No. 0403-008-302 and
updating of the JLR mining work program with expanded production for approval by
the Mines and Geosciences Bureau(MGB). It shall be reviewed and revised as
necessary to ensure slope stability at all times during the phases of quarry site
preparation, quarry operation and quarry rehabilitation, to the satisfaction of the
MGB.
1. The vertical height of working benches shall be kept at the maximum reach of the
shovel/loader being used.
2. No quarry is mined so close to the boundaries of the permit area in order to
provide adequate space to install protection against inadvertent access by any
person after such is abandoned.
1. Operators shall make a thorough walk-around inspection before you get on the
machine. A checklist shall be used in checking the truck accessories, to include
among others, tire blocks, fire extinguishers, etc. For proper mounting and
dismounting, operators shall face the machine whenever you get on or off the
machine and maintain a three point contact with the steps and handholds.
2. Fasten the seat belt before you start the machine.
3. Make sure that the control levers are in the hold position. Turn the engine start
switch to the ON position. Then release the engine start switch key and the
accelerator/decelerator pedal after the engine starts.
4. Operators shall allow the engine to warm-up at low idle for at least five minutes.
5. A test run shall be done before the unit is placed in the pit operation.
6. Do not allow unauthorized personnel to operate the machine.
7. Operators shall observe safety signs and warnings.
1. In the event of equipment power failure, the drill operator shall turn the controls
to neutral position and shall be left in such gear until power is restored.
2. When drilling near the crest of a bank, the drill shall be oriented at right angle
and not parallel to the bank.
3. Unauthorized persons shall not be permitted to stay on the platform when the
drill is in operation.
4. When the drill is to move over rough ground or on ramps at a considerable
distance, the drill pipe shall be racked and the rotary head lowered to the
deck.
5. Drill operators shall wear the necessary personal protective equipment such as
high tension gloves, dust respirator, and shall use the correct tool for every job.
6. When drilling for holes, the operator and his helper shall watch out for loose
rocks from the upper portion of the face.
7. When the machine is traveled with the front end leading wherein visibility is
poor, all movements of the drill shall be assisted by the helper or supervisor.
8. Under no circumstance shall the operator leave his unit with the motor running.
All controls shall be switched off and properly locked before the operator
leaves the unit. The operator shall also see to it that drill stationed on firm ground
and set away from any possible slide area.
1. Blasting operation shall be regularly done at 12:00 noon or between 3:00 and
4:00 P.M. unless otherwise changed reasonably, in which case, blasting shall be
supervised or coordinated by the Mine Manager. Securing the area and
warding off unauthorized persons and equipment from the layout shall be the
responsibility of the pit area foreman. Guards shall be posted at all entrances
and approaches to the area to be blasted 15 minutes prior to blasting time.
2. All areas which the blasting group considers unsafe during blasting shall be
thoroughly ridden of persons and equipment and proper signs and warning
posted prominently to prevent persons and vehicles from entering the areas
starting 15 minutes prior to blasting time.
3. Aside from the siren which shall be sounded immediately before blasting time, a
bull - horn shall be used to announce the time and area to be blasted and the
areas to be affected at least 15minutes before the actual blasting. In the
absence of a siren which will announce the blast about 2 to 3 minutes before
detonating the explosives, two or three trucks shall continuously sound their horns
until the blast is over.
4. Vehicles used in the evacuation of the loaders and other persons working with
explosives or those who secure the area prior to blasting shall be provided with
a two - way radio that shall be in good operating condition.
1. Operator shall maintain level cuts and slopes while you move forward as per
instruction as well as mining sequence.
2. Ripped-dozed sequence shall be followed in order to meet the pit & slope
design for safety purposes.
3. Dozed-pushed the material in a downward direction toward loading bay to
maximized blade capacity.
4. When a tractor-dozer is to be worked on a steep slope for the first time, three or
four bowls of dirt shall be dozed to the edge of the slope and kept in front of the
blade. Under no circumstance shall the operator try to regain the load if it is lost
down the slope.
5. Operators shall not be allowed to use the blade as a brake instrument on a steep
slope.
6. The operator shall inspect the bottom of the slope before pushing any load over
the slope, to prevent injury to both person and equipment.
7. In shaping up a loader pit, the operator shall keep away from a moving loader.
If it is necessary, shaping up shall be done only when the loader is on standby.
The operator shall inform the operator of the loader or its spotter of his presence
in the area.
8. Clean and level the work area during waiting periods. When cleaning a toe
under a bank, the operator shall watch out from falling rocks or impending slides
and on inclined ground, the blade shall be kept in a maximum low position.
9. Banks shall be properly cut / trimmed to ideal slope, bench height and width to
ensure safety and ground stability.
1. Spotters shall not be allowed to use truck lights in recording trips during night
operation.
2. After guiding the truck to dump position, the spotter shall stay away while
dumping is made.
3. Dump spotters shall report to the supervisor any indication of unsafe condition
or change in the condition of the dumpsite which he deems dangerous to both
operator and equipment.
4. As backing visibility is limited only on the right side of the truck, the driver shall
always turn to the left in order to keep the spotter always in his range of vision.
Spotters, on the other hand, shall always stay on the left of the truck and within
the sight of the driver.
5. No truck driver shall attempt to make a dumping operation without the
assistance of a spotter. If no spotter is in sight, he shall wait for one or request
the supervisor to provide in the area.
6. Spotters are not allowed to cross the path of a truck in dumping operation in
order to spot an incoming truck.
General Guidelines for Conducting Accident Investigation used by JLR are in pages
28-30 in Annex 12.
In collaboration with the unit managers, section heads, and supervisors involved, the
safety staff shall investigate to determine the cause/s of the accident to prevent a
similar accident from occurring again.
The Section Heads must ensure that accident reports are complete, establish an
internal accident reporting procedure that includes a cause system, and, if possible,
cost analysis.
Any witness, his direct superior, or manager must report a serious accident to the
safety officer straightforwardly using any means of rapid communication. Serious
accidents are defined as follows:
a) The death or serious injury of any employee while performing his assigned work.
b) Accidental damage to any company property costing more than P100,000.00
c) The death or property loss to a non-employee which cause is attributable to
any company operation or activity.
Following the provisions of DENR Administrative Order No. 96-40, Series of 1996, the
General Manager will report any accident/incident causing or creating the danger
of loss of life or serious physical injury to the MGB Regional Office within twenty-four
(24) hours.
JLR will implement a system for recording and reporting lost-time and non-lost-time
accidents. This will be done to analyze the causes of accidents, the frequency with
which they occur, and enact effective corrective measures to prevent accident
recurrence.
The details of the accident/analysis recording policy are in pages 32-40 in Annex 12.
The goal of JLR's Emergency and Response Plan is to develop a state of readiness and
to use special procedures to minimize personal injury, property damage, and business
interruption.
3.5.6.1 Evacuation
To ensure the safety of personnel during fires, an evacuation plan will be developed.
In a strong typhoon, a separate evacuation plan for equipment and other assets from
the plant and quarry sites is also required. People and support will be identified and
equipped with designated evacuation routes and shelter/assembly areas.
When an Emergency Alarm sounds, all plant personnel (including quarry personnel)
stop working except those with designated duties in this PLAN and proceed in an
orderly movement towards the following designated locations.
The JLR Workplace Safety Procedure instructs that fire, earthquake and evacuation
drills are to be tested at least four (4) times a year to ensure that these procedures are
functional. When conducting fire drills, the following factors are considered:
3.5.6.3 Communications
JLR's quarrying and processing operations are well served by a two-way radio or a
mobile phone communication network that can easily transmit and receive data to
and from its Mandaue City base station. It would not be challenging to relay
emergency information and notify JLR top officials, the emergency service group, and
outside assistance teams.
Priority tagging of records and office equipment critical to operations will be carried
out to identify which materials should be evacuated and saved first during an
emergency. Essential records will be duplicated and stored in a separate facility for
safekeeping.
JLR had designated a number of personnel to handle specific roles in the event of a
major disaster situation. Table 3.5- 4 lists down the responsible persons and describes
their respective roles during major disasters.
Table 3.5- 4 Responsible Persons and their Role During Major Disaster Situation
a. Emergency Maintains proper/efficient communication during
Response emergency situation.
Coordinator (QAD
Manager/Safety
Officer)
e. Equipment In- Ensures that heavy equipment such as trucks, pay loaders,
charge bulldozers and backhoe are readily available for whatever
aggravating situation that needs their services and special
attention.
From 2015 to 2020, JLR personnel did not encounter any accidents requiring first-aid or
resulting in body injury. In the six (6) years covered by statistics given in Table 3.5- 5, the
accidents encountered at the quarry site were minor, and among personnel of
subcontractors for blasting and hauling. Accidents in blasting resulted in minor injuries, and
the accidents resulting in property damage related to too narrow ramps changing bench
elevations, limited vehicle maneuver space at switchback road, and need for haul truck
drivers’ refresher orientation on heavy load gearing in the quarry site.
2 Property 07/21/2 9:00 DT-60 plunged Elmer JLR Reyna R. 07/22/2017 Installed bund walls, Case
Damage 017 a.m. from E+ 106 m, Antimaro- Cabuan Pelorina barriers on bench and closed
Damaged cowl, DT60 Haul switch back road for loss
chassis and dump Driver Road break
box
3 Property 08/19/2 9:50 DT-57 fell down at Antonio Quarry Reyna R. 08/20/2017 To widen run-away ramp Case
Damage 017 a.m. elevation 140 Heramil- elevation Pelorina at bench 140 and re- closed
meters. DT57 140 run install run-away ramp at
driver away bench 180
ramp
4 Property 1/22/20 9:00 DT53-9 crashed Jovan Quarry Reyna R. 01/22/2019 Re-orient drivers on the Case
Damage 19 a.m. and partially Lanojan- haul road Pelorina right gearing on Quarry closed
wrecked right side 3EM DT53- 900 area
cowl. 9 Driver meterage
5 Body 04/27/2 12:15 Fractured at the Engr. Active Reyna R. 04/27/2019 Mr. Gonzales was rushed Case
Injury 019 p.m. injured part right Freddieric Quarry Pelorina to South General Hospital closed
thigh K. B+190 m in City of Naga for
Gonzales/ medical attention. He
CONEX was treated for abrasion,
Project In contusion and fracture of
charge upper thigh.
Blasting engineer and
Safety Officer ensure that
6 Body 11/21/2 11:30 CONEX Drill CONEX E+160 m, Emman 01/10/2020 Mr. Quimada was bought Case
Injury 020 am Helper Bobby Drill Helper drilling Joseph T. to the hospital and was closed
Quimada was Robert area Tayad advised to rest. He was
struck by an Quimada first given light works
extension rod. before returning to his
work as a drill helper
7 Body 11/21/2 7:45 CONEX Drill Mark E+140 m Emman 11/21/2020 Mr. Arias was immediately Case
Injury 020 a.m. Helper Mark Arias Genesis Joseph T. bought to the hospital closed
right index finger Arias Tayad and was advised to rest
was amputated before returning to work
(light work)
From the viewpoint of personnel safety, the JLR operational control to manage Project
hazards and risks have been adequate, JLR personnel encountered no accidents from
2015 to 2020. For the proposed project expansion operations, continued implementation
of the health, safety and emergency preparedness program including the exercise of
quarterly emergency drills, will be important for JLR to maintain the admirable status of its
safety statistics under expanded production. The JLR protocols and procedures for safety,
health and emergency response and preparedness are clearly enumerated and are
given in simple, easy to understand language. These have merited the approval of the
Department of Labor and Employment and the Mines and Geosciences Bureau, and thus
we can assume it contains adequate controls. The responsive action of the Mine Manager
and Safety Officer to the accidents that occurred, aided preventing aggravation of the
injuries. The last mine road design-related accident was in 2017, indicating that the matter
has been addressed. The persistent injuries related to the blasting personnel.
With the proposed increase in quarry and crushing activities by 400% of its present
authorized production ceiling, it is apparent that JLR blasting and hauling subcontractors
need better enforcement of their respective safety programs, more frequent safety
meetings to remind constant vigilance in eliminating unsafe behavior and conditions.
Industrial companies engaged in the supply of blasting and large scale hauling services
are required by the Department of Labor and Employment to institutionalize and enforce
workers’ health and safety programs and procedures. Off-site service operations may
provide conditions allowing slack in enforcement of safety protocols.
For the protection of personnel and equipment, the possible inclusion of contract
conditions that authorize JLR to enforce safety procedures among subcontract personnel
drilling, blasting and hauling, and periodic review of the application of mine road safety
design standard will contribute to the control of conditions that gave way for past
accidents to happen.
Table 3.6- 1 Analysis of Risks During Site Preparation & Construction Phase
Consequence Consequence Likelihood Risk
The Risk How it can happen Existing/Proposed Controls
Event Occurring Rating Rating Rating
Review the geologic stability of
the (1) quarry site equipment
depot and evacuation areas
(2) Always move equipment to
safe location at end of the
Heavy, prolonged workday (3) Defer working on
rain occurs during rain-soaked areas, (4) wait until
slope excavation for earth has mostly dried before
road development, Quarry workers are resuming site preparation in
Slope failure earthquake occurs, injured, equipment is slopes >18%. (5) Work may be 3 3 6
ground acceleration damaged shifted to preparation of
exceeds soil shear drainage courses leading to
strength and stiffness, settling ponds, preparation of
and landslide occurs earth bunds and rock
stockpiles downslope of
material stockpile areas to
retain stockpiles. Make sure
adequate foundation for rock
piles/ bunds are made.
Increased accumulation
of silt and clay in aquifer
Large volume of silt
Site preparation is intake points, reducing
flowing into natural
undertaken while silt ground water resource Plans to establish adequate
waterways, contributing 4 4 8
control measures are replenishment and inland silt control measures
to the impermeability of
not yet functional depriving future
aquifer intake points
populations of water
access
Environmental Risk Assessment 514
Consequence Consequence Likelihood Risk
The Risk How it can happen Existing/Proposed Controls
Event Occurring Rating Rating Rating
In the future when
the average wind
speeds increase due
to climate change,
when ambient
temperatures are Stop equipment operation
Accidents due to Injury of personnel or
higher, the grounds during low visibility and allow
reduced visibility during equipment falling off from 3 2 5
are drier and a the dust to settle before
site preparation high ground
sudden gust of strong resuming work
wind reduces visibility
and increases the risk
potential for
equipment/vehicle
related accidents
As much as possible, weld
components in a verified safe
Welding operations if workshop.
done close to the For in-situ welding, Contractors
fuel storage area or of overhead conveyor
flammable materials structure, additional welded
may ignite a pool of ancillary facilities for Crusher
Nearby personnel may be
spilled fuel or oil Line 1 should present their
injured, nearby
safety standard operating
Fire equipment could catch 2 3 5
When open fuel is procedures to JLR Safety
fire or cause explosion
ignited by Officer for approval before
temperature from work commencement.
operating engine A “no-entry” 20-meter safety
and microwave zone may need to be provided
activity during between the motor pool /
refueling machine shop, the refueling
facility and the new
(temporary) welding
Table 3.6- 2 Analysis of Risks of Quarry Operation and Aggregate Processing Phase
To ensure that the identified risks can be properly addressed, the proposed mitigation
measures will be applied at the appropriate time, by the concerned person/entity
using the right resources. The recommended steps to manage risks are found in Table
3.7- 1
The following outlines the proposed Risk Action Plan, the responsible people, the
resources to be used, the timeframe for implementation and how it will be monitored.
Table 3.7- 2 List of the Identified Hazards and Aspects with their Corresponding Operational
Controls
Hazards Operational Control
Fall from heights During the demolition of equipment and structures, the controls
to be employed is the use or wearing of appropriate personal
protection such as safety belt or body harness whenever an
employee or worker is exposed to danger of fall from dangerous
heights. In addition to the wearing of such fall protection, it is
also necessary to employ the use of appropriate and adequate
working platform.
At the earthwork areas during the reshaping of the slopes and
surfaces, to prevent the occurrence of falling incidents from
dangerous height, the controls that would be employed is the
installation of barricade or signage at a certain distance along
the crest lines, in addition to the enforcement of the use of body
Among the activities that need to be done are site clearing, construction of quarry
access road, quarry development, and ground levelling for the in-pit crusher Plant
Line 2.
Site clearing as defined for the project is the removal of overburden materials to
expose the mineral intended for quarrying, leaving the land surface openly
threatened by external environmental factors (rain, temperature, weathering,
erosion, etc). It is also the removal of unwanted materials (trees, grasses, shrubs, soil,
etc.) which may hinder extraction, construction of building facilities and access
roads, installation of equipment and machineries. Heavy equipment (pay loaders,
backhoe, dump trucks, graders, etc) used in clearing are mobilized to their specific
area of operations. As such the following are perceived potential impacts of activities
related to site preparation are:
In regard to faunal communities in the area, the larger number of avian species
are insectivores, granivores, frugivores and omnivores, associated with
grasslands, and areas with surface waters that support insects and frogs.
Omnivores are favored with wide distribution of available forage materials.
There are waterways, a branch of the Cabuan Creek and the Naupa Creek
that course through the project site with water flowing all year round, and three
intermittent creeks, one live spring, and just outside of the active production
area, the Cogon River and the Matun-og river. There are lagoons to be located
in low lying areas with total capacity of 336,750 cubic meters to serve as storm
drain detention basin for run-off coursing over de-vegetated quarry areas.
Additional thirteen (13) settling ponds will be established in the expanded
quarry area. These will have a total surface area of 66,500 square meters and
10 meter depth each. Overall, the capacity of these ponds will be 665,000
cubic meters.
The Project expansion as planned, has sufficient settling ponds and riparian
buffer zones to sustainably provide forage materials for the extant avian
population.
The banks of settling ponds and lagoons are proposed to be lined and
stamped with stones, and grass species to be planted in the areas surrounding
the settling ponds and lagoons, outside of the tracks designated for truck
passage and landing. The purpose is to control bank erosion to prevent regular
bank erosion and maintain the water holding capacity of these facilities after
the vegetation has stabilized. The vegetative soil erosion control will also host
insects and frogs to support the avian population. Such stable greenery and
landform will also provide comforting views around the quarry as a statement
showing the harmonious co-existence between industry and nature.
1. Topsoil with organic materials stripped from quarry will be carefully stockpiled
in level well drained area and seeded with ground cover species if these will
not be immediately used.
2. Establish vermiculture to produce rich soil condition for nursery and
reforestation activities.
Environmental Management Plan 540
3. Propagate mycorrhizae for soil amelioration and healthy plant growth.
4. Fuel refilling and maintenance of heavy equipment in quarry site shall only be
for limited mobility equipment (backhoe, grader, driller, payloader, etc.).
Collect safely, remove oil spill or fuel before removing oil liner sheets. Store
spilled fuel oil away from heat or flowing water. Strictly observe DAO 92-29.
5. Establish concrete lined maintenance platform with outer perimeter lip and
negatively inclined or depressed internal elevation to allow flow of potential oil
spill into oil sump that snugly hold for a regular metal pan (approx. 5 gallons)
for easy lifting, removal, and cleaning.
6. Refueling in quarry site shall be done only for limited movement of equipment
if they are unable to go to Plant 2 depot for minor maintenance.
Water quality on the other hand is threatened by factors induced by the activities
during site preparation such as erosion, siltation, accidental spillage of large volume
of materials during handling, dumping of large volume of stripped waste materials,
discharge of spilled oil and other hazardous materials from vehicles and equipment.
JLR will implement the following prevention and enhancement measures:
1. Twice a day sprinkling of water on the soil stockpiles (10am and 2pm), opened
dry surfaces in crusher Plant 2 area to develop earth crust, thus reducing dust
suspension and airborne, also reducing more frequent watering requirement.
2. Establish roadways for vehicles for the Crusher Line 2 area, provide road edge
control such as embedded large stones and cover the roadways with gravel,
to reduce water sprinkling requirement for the premises where many workers
tend to converge.
3. Increase the planting of trees around the crusher premises to serve as
microclimate, noise buffer, dust filters and visual relief for workers.
4. Continue nursery operations to receive and nurture transferred trees and shrubs
for propagation and continue increasing the number of plants around Line 2
premises to restore comfortable conditions to support a pleasant environment
for intensive daily human activities.
5. In view of extreme increased in ambient temperature for the period 2020-2050
as forecast by PAGASA, consider the possible design of the Crusher Line 2
Administration office to have solar panels for alternative energy source, have
maximum feasible surrounding vegetation, have workable options to use
natural air circulation and good furniture placement for space cooling in case
of power outage, to use recycling water cooling on the roof and to have many
thick-leaved vegetation to surround the air conditioner compressor units to
help filter-out dust impact from Crusher 2 and cool the intake air. The building
roof has ample space to separate the locations of the recirculating cooling
water and solar panels.
For purchased rights, JLRCAI will continue payment of declared real estate taxes
to LGU.
For the alternative haul road from Cogon via Sitio Cabuan to Camp8 to Naga-
Toledo Highway, JLRCAI will provide at least a meter wide shoulder for pedestrian
use. They will compensate affected land claimants on forest land, equivalent to
the land zonal value designated by the BIR.
For the PAFs and other residents of the MPSA Host Barangaus, JLRCAI will:
Quarrying is a method of taking large solid blocks or broken masses of stone from the
earth and processing them for construction projects. For this project, quarrying is
conducted using explosive-blasting technique. Strong explosives are best if crushed
stones are desired, or a moderate explosive is used if larger or regular sized stones are
desired. This technique requires drilling of holes deep into the solid mass, The explosive
is put into the holes and set off by milli-second delayed detonation. The earth
materials will be brought to crusher plant for further processing/reducing them to
different sizes then stored into designated stockpile area awaiting for delivery
schedule to clients.
Slope instability in the quarry area is foreseen after blasting. This will be followed by soil
erosion and subsequent siltation of water bodies especially during rainy season. The
loss of surface soil quality likewise is expected. Some of the options for mitigation,
protection or enhancement of impacts are:
1. Control blasting sufficient for daily haul out capacity. No material will be left
in situ to prevent contribution to landslide in the event of earth movement
or heavy rain.
2. Provide a reference table to the blasting engineer, containing the safe
bench height and slope according to the condition of underlying rock
materials as per result of boreholes, if this has not been done yet, for
verifying the appropriate ANFO load to produce guaranteed safe slopes at
each blast.
3. Produce landward negative bench surface elevation when the bench
surfaces are being leveled or in progress, to allow fallen stones and small
rocks to roll toward landside than over the bench crest and prevent injury
to people downhill.
4. During bench maintenance works, always trench contour canals to guide
surface run off to flow to landside which eventually contribute land
cohesion instead of seeping into bench cracks which could already slightly
affected by earlier blasting. This preserves the strength of the benches that
will serve as future blasting platforms.
5. Regularly check the 20-meter-wide riparian buffer zone and institute
measure to control sediment flow into the surface water bodies, if any.
Ensure that the “wildlife corridor”, the 40-meter riparian buffer zone
interconnected waterways running from Mt Naupa area upstream, to
Cogon River and linked to upstream Cabuan creek, and eastward to
Matun-og river should always be devoid of soil overlay, clogged waterways
or vegetation damage or absence of fringing vegetation.
6. Include the regular vegetation planting along sparse sections of the riparian
buffer zone in the replanting program to promote its healing.
7. Implement vermiculture and mycorrhizae growing and apply the enrich soil
in holes targeted for vegetation planting such as around the perimeter of
crusher plant 2, the perimeter greenbelt, the Mt. Naupa ecological reserve,
tree planting areas in Camp 8 and Guindaruhan (the MPSA Buffer Zone).
8. Maintain topsoil stockpile by placing ground cover species to grow on the
stockpile for erosion control. Water the stockpile regularly to ensure growth
of the grass.
9. Continue proper waste segregation at source (offices, canteen, quarry).
Weekly tending of compost pit disposal of materials from recyclable waste
stockpile through accredited “Recyclers” or service provider and haul out
of residual wastes to sanitary landfill of Naga.
10. Continue proper collection and storage of used oil, spent lubricants, busted
lights, and spent batteries in accordance with DAO 29-92.
11. Regularly monitor MPSA premises and boundaries to prevent new informal
settlers, thus reducing pressure on natural resources.
Water bodies within and nearby or adjacent to the project site will be affected by
erosion and siltation induced by mineral extraction activities. Water resource if not
properly managed will be depleted. Such, can be prevented, reduced, or minimize
by the following measures:
The following are options to mitigate, prevent and enhance these concerns for air:
1. The ANFO load for each blast needs to be verified based on rock harness.
2. Install overhead sprayer in hooper loading to overhead conveyors at a rate
of 5 liters for every cubic meter of materials processed.
3. Sprinkle unpaved haul roads and shoulders two times a day the during dry
season.
4. Wetting of open spaces/areas in crusher plant 2 for health protection of
employees from dust inhalation.
5. Increase planting of trees around crusher plant 1 and plant 2 to serve buffer
for noise, dust, and microclimate protection.
6. Harden seedlings properly at the nursery. Regularly monitor growth of
transplanted seedlings to ensure survival. Replace the dying ones to ensure
the planned tree program generate carbon sink and offsets carbon
footprints.
7. Proper and regular maintenance be undertaken on all vehicles and
equipment.
8. Implement project speed limit of not more than 30 kilometers per hour in
quarry area and haul roads. Violation to be punishable as the management
deems fit, to reduce not only road dust resuspension but also reduce road
safety risks.
9. Ensure and secure covering of the materials from the hauling in the plant to
market destination.
10. Dump trucks for hauling and delivery of products will be provided with
mufflers. Implement the use of clean diesel fuel.
It is hereby noted that there are thirteen (13) farm sheds inside the quarry production
area and thirteen (13) residential houses made of light materials outside.
There are three houses along the proposed alignment of the alternative haul road
from north quarry to Cabuan School to Camp 8 and to Naga Toledo Highway.
1. Continue dialogue with the owners of farm shed and residential house to
arrive an agreement to settle the issue amicably.
1. Maximize the distance between the alignment of the alternative haul road
at from the houses to avoid property family / house relocation and
disturbance, reduce road safety risk, dust, and noise impacts.
2. Coordinate the acquisition of alternative haul road from north quarry to
Cabuan School to Camp 8 and to Naga Toledo Highway with the LGU, for
the LGU to acquire the right-of-way as government counterpart
3. Provide compensation to families affected by loss of land use for the
alternative haul road, by supporting training to qualify for employment in
the project and employing the eligible family members.
Job seekers and people with interest to engage business and economic activities
always go to places where there are opportunities. The JLR’s expansion project opens
opportunities to qualified individual for employment and attract investors establish
business to support the needs and material demand of the community.
Haul trucks and company vehicles and visitors at present are using the Cogon-
Cantaoan-Inayagan-Cebu South Road as primary access in coming in and out the
project site, thus traffic congestion is expected.
1. When acquired, JLR will pay real estate taxes to LGU covering the acquired
area, such as the 3.8245 hectares applied for patent to CENRO by four (4)
families, and the 1.6595 hectares with Free Patents and other land claims
for which tax declarations are being paid.
2. Undertake endeavor to swap land with affected claimant-owners in the
expanded quarry area if it is confirmed they do not have land claims in the
other areas, to avoid the project deepening their poverty.
3. Prefer awarding of work contracts and sub-contract to business owners in
Naga and Minglanilla if the requirements are locally available.
4. Prefer to contract out the nursery operations to land claimants within or
around the expanded quarry area.
5. Develop the capacity of local community association for livelihood as food
producer cooperatives, assist their registration with CDA, to supply food
materials (vegetables, meat and poultry goods and products, groceries
etc.) to company canteen.
6. Assist the community to develop livelihood projects among the existing
association, to supply company requirements such as soap, detergents,
cleaning agents, equipment, rags, or company uniform if possible.
For the case of this Project, the feasible mineable deposits have remaining life beyond
this MPSA. However, as required by law, planning to how to manage project
rehabilitation, decommissioning and abandonment are presented in the event of
sudden, unintended temporary or permanent cessation of project operations.
1. Use indigenous species for reforestation. Ground cover species, shrubs and
trees removed due to land clearing will be replanted in the areas previously
cleared by quarry activities.
Based on the result of the 2021 terrestrial flora survey focused on the
proposed quarry expansion area, the project site’s terrestrial ecosystem has
better biodiversity and vegetative cover than as reported in 2003 survey.
The wooded grassland that evolved by natural succession from the 60% to
70% grassland in 2003 now also hosts indigenous young individuals of
Dillenia philippinensis, Mangifera altissima and Pterocarpus indicus,
categorized as Vulnerable and Endangered, respectively under DAO 2017-
11 and the latter as Endangered species in the IUCN Red List 2020.
Based on the comparison of extant grass cover species in 2003 and 2021,
there are 36 ground cover species which were extant in 2003 and not
encountered in the areas surveyed for the proposed expanded quarry
area. For the preservation of the native soil cover, 43 ground cover species
in Table 4.1 are proposed to be planted as soil cover for the topsoil
stockpiles that will not be immediately utilized, and for the quarry sections
that will be partially rehabilitated and awaiting MPSA renewal:
2. All existing species found during the 2021 flora and fauna survey need to be
preserved on site.
3. No exotic species will be introduced.
Environmental Management Plan 551
4. Ensure that riparian buffer zones are intact, and waterways are flowing
freely.
Afforestation 997,060 1,395,883 1,675,060 2,010,072 2,403,747 2,680,096 3,015,108 1,675,060 15,852,086
Siltation
Control 942,857 1,320,000 1,584,000 1,900,800 2,273,074 2,534,400 2,851,200 1,584,000 14,990,331
Dust
Suppression 1,457,143 2,040,000 2,448,000 2,937,600 3,512,933 3,916,800 4,406,400 2,448,000 23,166,876
Erosion
Control 433,333 606,667 728,000 873,600 1,044,696 1,193,938 1,343,180 746,211 6,969,625
Monitoring 928,571 1,300,000 1,560,000 1,872,000 2,238,634 2,496,000 2,808,000 1,560,000 14,763,205
TOTAL 75,742,124
JLRCAI has already accomplished various community development activities with the
stakeholders. Listed in Table 5. 1 are the activities conducted by JLRCAI as part of
their Social Development Management Program (SDMP). The programs support
various projects that focus on educational enhancement, community health care,
infrastructure supplement, economic upliftment, community support, livelihood, and
IEC. Based on an analysis of JLR 2005 to 2018 SDMP financial disbursement record, (see
Table 5. 2), the highest priority was accorded to support to education (30%), medical
and health needs of Barangay Cogon (25%), and to requests for assistance in
infrastructure by the MPSA host Barangays (25%). Further analysis of the same records
indicates a slight SDMP overaccomplishment (Table 5. 3) by 8%.
2015
2016
2017
MOA Signing and Check Turn- Vincente Mendiola Center of Health, Completed
over City of Naga
2018
2019
2020
The proposed activities t in Table 5. 5 are indicative in nature, as the Project Social
Development and Management Program for 2022 will undergo participatory project
confirmation in January 2022. Table 5. 5 below includes projects committed by JLRCAI
in previous meetings, the community’s expressed felt needs and other projects are
designed to sustainably benefit the MPSA host communities should they decide to
take these options. MGB guideline on the amount to be designated for the Social
Development Program is used to determine the minimum budgetary allocation for
the social development program, based on the average ratio and proportion of the
JLRCAI SDMP from 2010 to 2019, projected to the scheduled annual production from
2021 to 2029. We note that the MPSA productive life in 2029 is only from January to
June.
The JLRCAI SDMP will attempt to shift the paradigm in its community assistance
program from dole-out mode to active partners in self-development by helping
them form and process a vision of their situation 9 years hence, igniting ambition
and harnessing government programs to help them attain their development
vision.
There are numerous on-line Government training programs from which the
interested community members may choose from, but a focus and convergence
is important, to make some significant progress in the improvement of living
conditions of the participating communities. The available online trainings include
the following:
a) Livelihood modules:
o. School-on-the-Air
FROM TESDA, the online training courses are also free to the public:
a. Agriculture
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1inNnWB1esYK1ELLZbHaxrFptxG-
36Ujx/view?usp=sharing
b) Environmental modules
a. Much of the land area of Project host Barangays are hilly to
mountainous. To manage soil nutrients and soil moisture for
agriculture, which is the primary livelihood occupation in these areas,
the Project will facilitate the provision of training in sustainable
The families falling below the poverty line and who will experience loss of land use
due to Project acquisition of mining right of way will be given the highest priority
for assistance in employment, skills or livelihood training and livelihood project
implementation.
Lands with slope above 81% are designated as Forest lands, among
others, to prevent massive and continuing soil erosion causing
siltation and damage to coastal resources, to secure the availability
of ground water supply, and to manage public safety risks
associated with unstable slopes.
In line with the Republic Act 10816, the Farm Tourism Act of 2016, the DA-ATI
assists participating entities to meet the requirements of the Department of
Tourism for accreditation as FTS (Farm Tourism Service) which will also
international marketing support. Government programs may change with
each administration but with a Law, the potential agri-ecotourism final
quarry land use plan will be assisted by various Government entities as
mandated by Law.
The JLR will offer the idea to the community to encourage their interest to
develop livelihood skills that complement and support an ecotourism resort,
such as those given in Item 2 a) and b) above. These livelihood training
opportunities are available on-line, free to the public. The trainings will
benefit the recipient as stand-alone training for skills that will enable them
to generate livelihood for themselves, as a group that may be linked to DTI
programs for mentorship and the value change of large companies, to be
sustainable. The online graduates will receive respective Certificates of
Attendance which will enable them to avail of job opportunities as the
economy opens up to recover from the impact of the Covid19 pandemic.
The work applicants from Barangay Cogon, Lanas, Guindaruhan, and Camp 8 will
have the first crack at project employment opportunities, for the Site Development
Construction, and Operation Phases. JLRCAI will post the list of job vacancies in highly
visible areas at the Barangay Halls. The remaining opportunities will be made available
to the rest of the residents of other Naga and Minglanilla barangays for which the
available vacancies will be posted in the lobby of the Municipal Hall. The objective is
to minimize labor in-migration to reduce potential additional sources of increase in
municipal and human wastes, and the subsequent additional requirement for
sewerage infrastructures. An uncontrolled increase in the resident population will
likewise increase the competition for food, raise food prices, worsen the plight of
families below the poverty line, and also frequently are sources of peace and order
problems. Labor migrants also compete with the unemployed and underemployed
residents of Naga and Minglanilla.
JLRCAI will require its Contractors and Subcontractors to employ 70% of labor, primarily
from Barangays Cogon, Lanas, Guindaruhan, and Camp 8. When the requirement
remains unfilled, they may search among applicants from other Barangays of Naga
and Minglanilla. Among the employment qualification requirement will be any proof
of long-term permanent residence in Naga or Minglanilla, without the need for LGU
Certification which might be a cause of red tape and employment delay.
4. Support to Education
Just like in many Provinces in the Philippines, the top two (2) highest educational
levels completed among the population of Naga and Minglanilla are Elementary
level and High School Level. In consultation with the labor force of Naga City and
Minglanilla Municipal Government, JLRCAI, with the Contractors and
Subcontractors may hold a Job Fair with the MPSA-host Barangays, to present the
job opportunities in this project, open dialogues regarding the qualification
requirements. JLRCAI and its Contractors and Subcontractors may conduct a
structured survey by asking potential job applicants to accomplish a form, which
will be used to assess the training requirements to quality for jobs in the Project,
and for JLRCAI to include in the SDMP, the budgetary requirements for
employment candidates showing aptitude for the Project work requirement,
including scholarships in the Cebu Institute of Technology.
This will be done ahead and in time such that the local labor force will be able to
effectively fill the Project requirements.
In coordination with the Department of Education (DepEd) and the City of Naga
and Minglanilla Municipal Governments, the JLRCAI will continue to help support
unexpected, unfunded the educational needs of the Project Host and
Neighboring Communities that may arise.
The distribution of School Kits including facemasks and soap to students, WIFI
equipment for schools, individual framed plastic barriers, will continue.
In support to the students’ need for allowance to prepare their projects, the JLRCAI
will coordinate with DepEd Region VII Office regarding the possible nursery
preparation work for High School students in Cogon, Sitio Cabuan, Barangay Lanas
and Barangay Guindaruhan. The school nursery is intended to provide some
allowance to indigent students for their school project. JLRCAI will purchase the
seedlings which will be planted in the MPSA buffer zones.
6. Infrastructure
7. Environment
JLRCAI has offered and will continue to offer its support in the community
beautification of Barangay Guindaruhan, particularly in Sitio Katikan, Sitio Lomboy,
and Sitio Kapihan.
The JLRCAI will support the propagation and sharing of leafy hanging ornamental
plants and tree seedlings to the residents of Barangay Cogon, and the residents along
the Cogon-Cogon-Tunghaan-Cebu South Road to help filter noise and buffer road
dust from material transport. In Table 5. 5 this is listed under Livelihood concern as this
Table 5. 5 is an indicative and proposed Project SDMP Program for 2022 to 2029.
The Implementing Rules and Regulations (IRR) of the Philippine Mining Act MGB require
operating projects that exploit mineral resources to allocate an equivalent of 1.5% of
the year’s Operating Cost, for the following year’s Social Development and
Management Program (SDMP).
The SDMP funding estimate (Table 5. 7) contain the annual budget estimate based
on the Project maximum production until the end of the current MPSA life, on June 13,
2029.
The history of JLRCAI SDMP actual expenditure from 2012 to 2019 on has always been
above the amount required under MGB guidelines due to the socially responsive
attitude of its management.
The Information, Education, and Communication (IEC) activities for the project will
have the following objectives:
1. To inform and educate the public regarding the Project activities, ECC
conditions and committed mitigating measures and residual environmental
effects, if any.
2. To educate the Project host communities that the Project does not cause
landslide, that landslide vulnerability is a natural phenomenon, and the
suggested actions that will mitigate the impact of this situation to the human
community (tree planting, preservation of tree cover, minimization of land
disturbance, Sloping Agricultural Land (cultivation) Technology).
3. To educate the charcoal makers and fuel wood gatherers regarding potential
alternative livelihood and employment from the Project and for the future (Mt.
Naupa Eco reserve Preservation), livelihood assistance from DENR/CENRO.
4. To educate the Project host and neighboring communities that quarrying is a
time-bound activity, and that sustaining post-quarry livelihood and
employment need to start early, with time to mature and grow, while the
Project assistance is still available.
5. Job fair, employment matching, training needs identification, identification of
potential candidates for scholarship for more technological education for the
Project requirement
6. To assist in the delivery of Government training and educational videos to
promote livelihood skills development
7. To facilitate the delivery of community organizing assistance to the women’s
association of Barangay Camp8 to utilize sewing machines they received
earlier, for livelihood.
Table 5. 6 presents the indicative IEC plan, which can be further improved as the
Project implementation experience of expanded operations identify needs for better
understanding of the challenges in project implementation and compliance to
environmental commitments.
Affected households
2021-2022
Property relocation/ Mine Manager
Relocation of houses within the proposed JLRCAI internal
right of way 10 Affected families Barangay LGU Pre-site 500,000.00
expanded production area fund
acquisition ComRel preparation
phase
CENRO
Cogon Women’s
Hog Fattening Project Cogon, Lanas ComRel 2022 SDMP
Livelihood Association
5,147,000
Women’s’ Association of Cogon Women’s
Propagation of Hanging Ornamental Plants ComRel 2023 to 2024 EPEP
Barangay Cogon and Cogon Association
Barangay
Provision of Wide Screen Smart TV, WIFI, signal
Chairpersons of
antenna booster, for livelihood and skills Barangay Captains ComRel 2022-2024 SDMP
Cogon, Guindaruhan,
trainings
Lanas and Camp8
Principals and
Students of MPSA Host
Education School Kit Distribution Teachers of MPSA ComRel 2022 to 2029 SDMP
Barangays
Barangays
Common Study Area with WIFI Cogon & Guindaruhan Cogon and
Elementary School Guindaruhan
ComRel 2021 SDMP
Elementary School
Scholarship program Principal and teachers
Cogon Elementary
Concretize the school ground Cogon Elementary School ComRel 2021 SDMP
School Principal
Barangay Captain of
School bus Cogon Elementary School ComRel 2024 SDMP
Cogon
Principals and
Provision of Wide Screen Smart TV, Amplifier Elementary and High Schools
Teachers of MPSA ComRel 2021-2022 SDMP
and WIFI for on-line education of MPSA Host Barangays
Barangays
Provision of Radio for DA School on the Air Leaders of Farmers Farmers’ Association
ComRel 2022 to 2024 SDMP
Program, loudspeaker Organizations Leaders
Philippine Dentists’
Isang Milyong Sipilyo Program MPSA Host barangays ComRel 2021 to 2029 SDMP
Association
9,309,000.00
Donation for the Construction and City of Naga Infirmary
City of Naga Infirmary Hospital ComRel 2021 to 2029 SDMP
Maintenance of City of Naga Infirmary Hospital Hospital Director
Barangay
Chairpersons and
Provisional allocation for Management of Leaders (Formal and Informal)
Health Workers of ComRel 2022 to 2029 SDMP
Public Health Emergency (Pandemic) of MPSA Host Barangays
Cogon, Guindaruhan,
Lanas, Camp 8
Infrastructure Bailey Bridge Rip-rap Project Guindarohan Road Proper ComRel 2022 SDMP 9,309,000.00
Barangay Chairperson,
Cogon to Cabuan (Crusher 1 Bypass Road) ComRel 2022 EPEP
Cogon
Community
Sponsorship/ Peace Barangay Guindarohan Guindaruhan Parish
Donation for the Guindarohan Chapel ComRel 2022 SDMP
and Order/ Religion & Catholic religious group Priest
Cultural Preservation
Donation of sand and gravel for the Camp8 Barangay Camp 8 Catholic
Camp8 Parish Priest ComRel 2022 SDMP
Chapel religious group
Barangay
Online Seminar on Conflict Management and DILG Local Government Chairpersons of
ComRel 2023 SDMP
Resolution Academy Cogon, Guindaruhan,
Lanas and Camp8
Target Sector Identified as Major Topic/s of Concern in Relation Indicative Timelines and
IEC Scheme/ Strategy/ Methods Information Medium Indicative Annual Cost (PhP)
Needing Project IEC to Project Frequency
Charcoal makers and fuel wood Potential Project job opportunities for
gatherers in forest lands in Naga charcoal makers and fuel wood
and Minglanilla gatherers, the effect of deforestation 2023. To be documented in video
to frequency of landslide, future and uploaded to YouTube.
plans for Mt. Naupa Tourism
Development and local
employment opportunities it will
generate, the Project ultimate To be replayed regularly as
quarry rehabilitation plan in support determined by the barangay
to Mt Naupa Tourism Development Captain or the Project, or CENRO
and impact of charcoal making and
Lecture and Workshop from DENR
forest wood gathering in the Orientation-Workshop
CENRO
development of the young forest
trees in the area. Penalties under
Presidential Decree No. 705, s. 1975.
Implementation of survey
questionnaire to identify their skills,
work interests and attitude toward
being work-regulated by an
Employer.
Labor force in Barangays Cogon, Project information, presentation of Project Job Fair • Invitation letter • 2021
Guindaruhan, Lanas and Camp construction, quarry and crushing • Overhead presentation • 2022
8 works/ activities, potential job
opportunities, filling-up of
• Hand-outs listing the • 2023
questionnaires from JLRCAI, Government
Contractors and Subcontractors on educational/ training
candidate selection for possible module from TESDA
employment.
which the interested
applicants can learn
while waiting for the
project employment to
open
Interested residents from Livelihood skills on-line video training Video showing • Playing of YouTube 2022 to 2029
Barangays Cogon, from various Government agencies video presentation
Guindaruhan, Lanas and Camp (Dept. of Agriculture, TESDA, Dept. of Video showing to all interested
8 Trade and Industry
through smart TV sets groups, as per schedule by the
donated by Project Barangay Education and
Livelihood Promotion Worker
JLR Employees, Contractors and • The Project EMP and ECC Training -Seminars ▪ Audio-visual Quarterly
Subcontractors conditions, compliance presentations
requirements and penalties ▪ Handbooks
• Clean Air Act and project ▪ Practical drills
mitigating measures
• Clean Water Act and project
mitigating measures
• Wildlife Protection Act and
response actions
• Solid Waste Management Act
and project management
measures
• Hazardous Act and project
management measures
• Occupational Health and
Safety Guidelines and
Procedures of the Project
• Daily Safety Review and
Awareness
• Organizing and capacitating
the new Emergency
Response Team members
• On-the-Job Hazard
Identification And Risk
Assessment training
• First aid and emergency
response training/ refresher
course
Education 30% 714,286 714,286 1,250,000 1,620,000 2,088,000 1,680,000 1,920,000 2,700,000 1,620,000 14,306,571
Medical and Health Services 25% 595,238 595,238 1,041,667 1,350,000 1,740,000 1,400,000 1,600,000 2,250,000 1,350,000 11,922,143
Infrastructure Program 25% 595,238 595,238 1,041,667 1,350,000 1,740,000 1,400,000 1,600,000 2,250,000 1,350,000 11,922,143
(Support to Community ) Environment 5% 119,048 119,048 208,333 270,000 348,000 280,000 320,000 450,000 270,000 2,384,429
Community Sponsorship/ Peace and 71,429 71,429 125,000 162,000 208,800 168,000 192,000 270,000 162,000 1,430,657
3%
Order/ Religion & Cultural Preservation
Information and Education 5% 119,048 119,048 208,333 270,000 348,000 280,000 320,000 450,000 270,000 2,384,429
TOTAL 98% 2,333,333 2,333,333 4,083,333 5,292,000 6,820,800 5,488,000 6,272,000 8,820,000 5,292,000 46,734,800
The compliance matrix in Table 6.1 states the summary status of Project compliance
to ECC conditions. As of February 2021, the Project has not been issued Notice of
Violation by EMB Region 7. The primary environmental compliance concern
presented by Project monitoring data and the observed site conditions indicate
substantive compliance to environmental standards, except for mine run-off water
quality management as discussed in Section 6.1.1 below. The actual site
environmental conditions observed in mid-February and May 2021 manifest the
presence of silt control structures along Cabuan Creek and Cogon River which
serve as storm drain management units. Water resource management through
process water recycling and traffic management through distribution of truck haul
road assignments to various barangay roads are implemented by JLRCAI.
Poor records keeping is noted, the owner’s copy of submitted SMRs and CMRs to
EMB Region 7 is incomplete although copies of laboratory tests of water quality
have been kept (Annex 15 page 43). Road safety concern is a valid issue for the
Project community as of February 2021. Five (5) inland quarries including JLRCAI use
the Cogon-Guindaruhan-Tunkop Barangay Road to Cebu South Road. Managing
potential road safety issues was not flagged in the 2004 Environmental
Management Plan (see Annex 38) as the potential industrial traffic in the area at
the time was not significant.
Compliance to Condition
Subject Matter Condition Remarks
Other environmental quality parameters for which baseline levels were made available
in the 2004 EIS are used to indirectly confirm observations and hypothesis regarding the
Project environmental performance.
250
TSS Concentration (mg/l)
200
150
100
50
-50
Monitoring Period
The exceedances of TSS in monitored water quality stations were attributed to sources
upstream of Cabuan creek, from the operations of small scale quarry operators. Project
contribution to the background TSS level will be prevented as much as possible in the
expanded quarry operations through the establishment on in-situ silting ponds (see Figure
1.4, Mine Development Plan) capable to holding peak storm run-off volume (see Table
2.2-8). What failed to be documented are the TSS concentrations upstream of Silt Pond
#1 to determine the background TSS level, and after Silt trap #6, (see large red arrows,
Figure 6.2) to determine the final TSS level at the point of final release from project silt
control facility.
In February 2021, water quality sampling undertaken from updated water quality
monitoring locations (Figure 6.4) indicate that the level of TSS as the water body
reaches upstream of Crusher 1 location is below the standard limit of 80 mg./L
(Figure 6.3 and Annex 15 pages 27,28 and 30). From the viewpoint of meeting the
EQPL limit, the TSS load from JLR quarry site reverts below Class C DAO 2016-08
standard limit. The water quality sampling in 2021 occurred under wet weather
conditions.
1400 1,298
1200
1,035
1000
800
600
400
200 80 80
62 80 80 80
0 16 39
0
STN.3 02/17 STN. 02/17 STN.5 02/17 STN. 6 02/17 STN. 7 07/14
Figure 6. 3 TSS levels Sampled from Project Impact Receiving Waters, Feb. 17 & June
14, 2021
For the proposed quarry expansion activities, only inland silt control will be implemented.
The water quality impact monitoring will be continued in the following locations:
3 123° 43' 42.830" 10° 16' 46.620" Cabuan Creek (upstream of Quarry)
4 123° 44' 32.299" 10° 16' 30.277" Cabuan Creek (outfall of quarry silt pond)
5 123° 44' 39.674" 10° 16' 59.520" Cabuan Creek (outfall of quarry silt trap)
Reduction and compliance to DAO 2016-08 TSS standard in WQ stations 4 and 5 will
indicate JLR Project compliance to environmental regulations. Water quality in WQ
Station 1 and 8 however are influenced by the intermitted riverbed screening activities
of local sand and gravel quarry operators and are not completely within the control of
JLR project operations.
Granting the TSS concentrations in WQ4 and WQ5 compliance to DAO 2016-08 standard,
the continued and long term exceedance of TSS concentrations in Cogon River
contributed from Matun-og creek (WQ Station 1) and other small scale quarry activities
in Barangay Inayagan (WQ8) could contribute to the healing and closing of cracks and
crevices in the water-bearing rocks underlying the lowland areas, and reduce aquifer
ground water recharge losing water supply for the lowland populations of Naga and
Minglanilla in this section. This challenge is endorsed to the Local Government Units of
Naga and Minglanilla who have site presence and due to devolution of functions in local
environmental management under the Local Government Code of 1991, have the
power and mandate to enforce quarry silt control while allowing livelihood from natural
resources. Gabions and in-land settling ponds should be required from small scale quarry
operators along Cogon River due to the special role of Cogon River in local aquifer
recharge.
Basketball Court
Near Cabuan Less
Northwest
Elementary AI/N1 11 45 16 than
of Quarry
School (N1017’ 0.003*
11" E123° 44'19")
Sitio Bantoon
Near Volleyball Less
Southwest
Court (N10 A2/N1 26 58 14 than
of Crusher
16’35" 0.003*
E123°45'8")
Quarry Area Quarry
Elev.110M stockpile Less
and A3/N1 40 182 17 than
(N10° 16'54” loading 0.003*
E123°44'50") area
From the result of third-party air quality verification sampling conducted in February
15 to 19, 2021, the Project air quality impact parameters (Particulates) were found
to be within the National Ambient Air Quality Standards and Guidelines.
78
76
75
74
72
70 70
68
66
64
62
60
58
76
75
74
72
70 70
68
66
64
62
60
58
On November 21, 2019, EMB Region VII received a complaint from Ninfa M. Alcantara, Elisea M. Miñoza and Aurora M. Lapuz, heirs
of Demetrio Saavedra Miñoza against the occupation of JLR of Lot No. 9047-p, Cadastral Lot No. 10-10-123-44 ~ with an area of 1.5
hectares, found within the Crusher Line 1 area (see Annex 5). The complainants requested for certification whether the Project has
an existing ECC. Annex 5 also includes the tax declaration of real property in the name of JLRCAI. The document being requested
by the said complainants is in Annex 3.
3 Road Repair Jenefer Candatu, Octob 8:30 Requested Reynan Road repair
Lascuna Minglanill er 5, am that the Pelorina, completed.
a. Near 2020 road behind Emman
crushing the Crusher Tayad,
plant 1 Plant be Roanly
repaired, Teopis
the passage
is too deep
the
motorcycles
have
difficulty
traversing.
4 Road Andres Sitio Novem 7:00 Complainan JLR Complainant filed a
Obstruction Deiparine, 56 Candatu ber 13, am t requested Representati Brgy Blotter at Brgy
using years old Road, 2020 that the ves: B. Guindaruhan. Upon
Multicab Brgy road Camasura, meeting JLR Com
Plate No. Guindaru maintenanc Eugene U. he apologized that
JEC 423 han e be Daniel, he did it and
(along properly Tayad, mentioned he will
Candatu done and Emman and not do it again.
bridge) with sound Teopiz, Aside from the bad
materials Roanly, road, complainant
because CONEX Rep: said in the Affidavit
their Eldynmer in Barangay that he
vehicles get Alfaro had no other
bogged concern regarding
down and JLR.
can’t
(Brgy. Cogon Other persons in the
manage the
Tanod) Erwin barricade were
rut.
Encabo and talked-to and
Table 6. 7 Summary of MMT Discussions and Recommendations in Selected Meetings, 2019 and 2020
Core MMT Discussions February 21, 2020 September 20, 2019 July 4-5, 2019 March 04, 2019 REMARKS
EMB Memorandum 38 MMT recommended Air quality sampling by MGB Air quality sampling by Air quality JLR acquired high
dated December 16, JLRCAI use of 3rd Party was not conducted due to MGB was not sampling by volume sampler and is
2019, states that for Air Quality sampling defective equipment. conducted due to MGB was not in the process of
sampling and/or (Covid19 pandemic was defective equipment. conducted due applying for laboratory
laboratory analysis for declared on March 16, to defective accreditation from
air and water quality 2020. Regular operations equipment. EMB7.
parameters for projects of accredited 3rd party
under the Mine laboratories were
Rehabilitation Fund affected most of 2020)
Committee (MRFC) will
not be done by EMB 7
Laboratory.
Installation of concrete Reported 90% Reported 90% MMT R.A. 9275 “Clean Water
blocks as barricades at complete. Further complete. recommended Act” instructs pollution
1000 to 1,200 meters recommended the installation of clean-up of natural
downstream of Cabuan additional layer of concrete blocks water bodies, ~ to
Creek concrete barrier. as barricades at meet DAO 2016-08
1000 to 1,200 Water Quality
meters Standard.
downstream of
Cabuan Creek
8. The Project will likewise monitor the status of fresh water ecosystem in the
following locations (see Table 6.6) on quarterly basis, in accordance with
DAO 2016-05. Freshwater ecology indicators should be expected in view
of the change in Project method of quarry run-off water and siltation
management from “in-river” to “inland” and DENR reminder to the
concerned Local Government Units to improve on their implementation
of environmental management functions as charged under the Local
Government Code of 1991.
6.2.5 Self-Monitoring
JLRCAI will monitor its environmental compliance and submit quarterly Self-
Monitoring Reports (SMR) and bi-annual Compliance Monitoring Report (CMR) to
the Environmental Management Bureau through online systems or manually as per
schedule when the online system is not available. The SMR will include a reporting
of the following information:
As may be observed from Table 2.2-15, the other water quality parameters are
generated from non-project and background sources and therefore are not within
Project control.
The Project multipartite monitoring team (MMT) is chaired by the Mines and
Geosciences Region VII and composed of the following representatives:
The following are the functions of the Multisectoral Monitoring Team (the MMT)
Enforce in mining projects the different environmental laws, rules and regulations ~,
especially as provided under PD No. 1586, R.A. 6969, the Control of Toxic
Substances and Hazardous and Nuclear Wastes, RA No. 6969, Ecological Solid
Waste Management Act of 2000, R.A. 9275, the Philippine Clean Water Act of 2004
(RA No., and R.A. 8749, the Philippine Clean Air Act of 1999.
Update the MGB CO and ROs about the current policies on the implementation
and enforcement of the PEISS, environmental standards, and compliance
monitoring.
Ensure that personnel from the MGB CO and RO concerned shall participate in the
conduct of scoping, review and evaluation of the EIA Reports of proposed mining
projects.
Ensure that the findings and recommendations of the MMTs, the MGB and its ROs,
if warranted, are acted upon ~.
3) the conduct of scientific or research studies that will aid in the prevention or
rehabilitation of accidents and/or risk-related environmental damages; or
The CLRF shall be in the form of Mine Rehabilitation Fund (MRF) or the Rehabilitation
Cash Fund (RCF), the Environmental Trust Fund and the Final Mine Rehabilitation
Fund. Table 6. 4 shows a comparison of the funds available and will be made
available by JLRCAI to serve the purposes of environmental guarantee,
environmental monitoring and mine rehabilitation.
For the construction and operation of the crushing facilities, the JLRCAI will secure
Comprehensive All-risk Insurance (CARI) from domestic insurance company. The
amounts for CARI indicated below are based on 3% of construction cost for first
three months and .03% per month in excess of three months. The actual CARI
premium may change after negotiation with the insurance underwriter. An initial
amount of three hundred thousand will be deposited in a trust fund for Quick
Response related to concerns regarding undue events from crushing operations.
At any rate, the JLRCAI commits to take accountability for any and all obligations
to affected persons and for environmental remediation as may be required
resulting from unforeseen events related to its crushing operations.
Pursuant to DENR Administrative Order (DAO) NO. 96-40, the JLRCAI will increase
the Project Final Mine Rehabilitation Fund (FMRDF) (see Table 6. 4) commensurate
with the planned agri-eco tourism plan for the mined-out project site. The Final Mine
Rehabilitation and Development Plan to be submitted to the Mines and
Geosciences Bureau will flesh-out and detail the plans as mentioned above. Upon
FMRDP approval, the FMRDF shall be established in escrow account by JLRCAI
following guidelines under DAO) NO. 96-40.
Any and all public concerns are currently personally overseen by the General
Manager (GM), received by the Community Relations Manager (CRM). Minor
The JLRCAI GRM process flow is illustrated in Error! Reference source not found.
NO
All the wastes generated will be properly disposed or recycled. Construction debris
and domestic wastes will be segregated, and all residual wastes will be hauled out
by the Municipal waste collectors. All hazardous wastes will also be collected by
DENR-registered haulers. Human wastes from the portable toilets will be properly
siphoned by DENR-register de-sludgers. No wastes will be left in the project site.
In view of the area proximity to the Mt. Naupa nature park of the Naga City
Government, the JKRCAI will present the Project FMRDP (final mine rehabilitation
plan) concept to Naga City Government for concurrence.
At the end of mine life, the slopes in the project site will be predominantly <18% and
the land will be better suitable for other sustainable land uses other than forestation,
should be able to serve the purpose of protecting the local aquifer while being a
source of food, recreation and jobs for the locality. Open land access through
Alienable and Disposable status may not be an option due to potential loss of
control over land use creating significant siltation to Cogon River that could
contribute to the eventual closure of downstream aquifer intake points. The best
option is to have one agreement with private sector entity willing to operate the
area with key environmental measures to enable it to sustain and enhance
ecosystem services such as (1) the protection of post-quarry land cover and (2)
regular desilting of settling ponds and lagoons. Other economic benefits may be
derived around a land use masterplan that considers these two (2) concerns. The
value of renewability water supply for Naga population is unquantifiable, no
economic consideration is believed to be of more value than its protection while it
is not lost.
The mixed use zone may include the lagoons, settling ponds and a bike trail or
circuit for non-motorized vehicles.
Buffer zone. Only trail development will be allowed in the buffer zone.
Core conservation zone. This area will be replanted only with indigenous and
endemic species. No human intrusion will be allowed in the conservation zone
during ecotourism activity operation.
The Project site, upon turn over to the Government, shall manifest the following
conditions:
She will ensure that the Project Environmental Management Plan will be
implemented and the ECC conditions will be complied.
At the Project site, the safety officer undertakes daily inspections of the active
quarry to serve as “double check” for the implementation of safety procedures
and protocols by the subcontractors.
Regularly inspect the safety conditions at all crushing premises, guests and
personnel compliance to safety regulations.
Abraham R. Lucero Jr., Report Of The Geological Core Logging Activities For Aggregates
Deposits Within Mineral Production Sharing Agreement (MPSA 194-2004 VII, Barangay Cogon,
Naga City, Cebu, DYNAMIC GEOENVIRONMENTAL SPECIALIST, INC., November 2015
Allen, T.I., Marano, K., Earle, P.S., and Wald, D.J., 2009, PAGER-CAT—A composite earthquake
catalog for calibrating global fatality models: Seismological Research Letters, v. 80, no. 1, p.
50-56.
Barrier, E.,P. Huchon and M. Aurelio, 1991, Philippine fault—A key for Philippine kinematics:
Geology, v. 19, no. 1, p. 32-35.
Barton N.R, Empirical Slope Design for Hard and Soft Rocks using Q-slope (American Rock
Mechanics Association, 2015)
Bird, Peter, 2003, An updated digital model of plate boundaries: Geochemistry Geophysics
Geosystems, v. 4, no. 3, 52 p.
Cardwell, R.K., Isaacks, B.L., and Karig, D.E., 1980, The spatial distribution of earthquakes, focal
mechanism solutions, and subducted lithosphere in the Philippine and northeastern Indonesian
Islands, in Hayes, D.E., ed., The Tectonic and Geologic Evolution of Southeast Asian Seas and
Islands, Geophysical. Monograph Series, v. 23, p. 1-35, American Geophysical Union (AGU),
Washington, D.C.,
DELFIN AÑORA CAMPO , PROJECT FEASIBILITY STUDY, MPSA NO. 194-2004-VII, July 9, 2020
DeMets, Charles, Gordon, R.G., and Argus, D.F., 2010, Geologically current plate motions:
Geophysical Journal International, v. 181, no. ftp. 1-80, doi: 10.1111/j. 1365-
Galgana, Gerald, 2008, Geodetic Investigations of Active Crustal Deformation in the Philippine
Plate Boundary Zone and the Intraplate Region of the Central United States: Bloomington, Ind.,
Indiana University, Ph D. dissertation.
Galgana, Gerald, Hamburger, M.W., McCaffrey, Robert, Corpuz, Ernesto, and Chen, Qizhi,
2007, Analysis of crustal deformation in Luzon, Philippines, using geodetic observations and
focal mechanisms: Tectonophysics, 432 (2007), 63-87.
GEBCO, 2008, The GEBCO_08_Grid, ver. 20091120: GEBCO. Accessed Jan. 8, 2010 at
http./Avww.gebco. net/.
Giardini, Dominico, Grunthal, Gottfried, Shedlock, K.M., Zhang, Peizhen, and Global Seismic
Hazards Program, 1999, Global Seismic Hazards Map: Global Seismic Hazards Map Program
(GSHAP). Accessed Jan. 9, 2007 at
Hamburger, M.W., Cardwell, R.K., and Isacks, B.L., 1983, Seismotectonics of the northern
Philippine island arc, zw Hayes, D.E., ed., The tectonic and geologic evolution of southeast
Asian seas and islands—Part 2: Geophysical. Monograph. Series, v. 27, p. 1-22, American
Geophysical Union (AGU), Washington, D C.,
Hayes, G.P, Wald, D.J., and Johnson R L., 2012, A three-dimensional model of global
subduction zone geometries: Journal of Geophysical Research, v. 117, B01302,
http://earthinfo.nga.mil/publications/specs/printed/89009/89009_DCW.pdf.
http://seismo.ethz.ch/GSHAP.
JOHN A. PETERSON , Landscape Evolution in Cebu, Central Philippines: The Impact of Sea
Level, Social History, and Tectonism on Archaeological Landscapes
Karig, D.E., Anderson, R.N ., and Bibee, L.D., 1978, Characteristics of back arc spreading in the
Mariana Trough: Journal of Geophysical Research, v. 83(B3), doi:
Klaus, Adam, Taylor, Brian, Moore, G.F., Murakami, Fumitoshi, Okamura, Yukinobu, 1992, Back-
arc rifting in the Izu-Bonin Island Arc—Structural evolution of Hachijo and Aoga Shima Rifts:
Island Arc, v. 1, issue ftp. 16-31.
Leo Armada, Carla Dimalanta, Nathaniel Parcutela, Rurik Austria, Jenielyn Padrones,
Betchaida Payot, Karlo Queaño & Graciano Yumul Jr. (2020) Bouguer Anomaly of Central
Cebu, Philippines, Journal of Maps, 16:2, 577-584, DOI: 10.1080/17445647.2020.1791270
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), 2010, National Geophysical Data
Center (NGDC): National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Accessed on Mar.
21,2010 at http://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/hazards.
P.C. Dolom, L.A. Bugayong, M.C.S. Casin, M.M.B. Villanueva, N.L. Tolentino, F.B. Pulhin,
A.B.Palacpac, H.L.L. Capinpin, LA. Donoso, B.C. Aguilon, J.C. Nicmic, J.F. Castillo, M.K. Buot,
R.V.C. Cabrera: Policy Paper on the The Sustainable Forest Management Law (Executive Order
No. 318):Formulation of its Implementing Rules and Regulations, Ecosystems & Development
Journal 8(2): 69–81 ISSN 2012–3612. October 2018.
Procedure for Determining the Angle of Basic Friction (Static) Using a Tilting Table Test, Materials
Engineering and Research Laboratory, code 86-68180, Technical Service Center, Denver,
Colorado.
Rijwana Parwin1, and Kak oli Karar Paul, Treatment of kitchen wastewater using Eichhornia
crassipes, EDP Sciences
Scholz, C.H., and Campos, J., 1995, On the mechanism of seismic decoupling and back arc
spreading at subduction zones: Journal of Geophysical Research, v. 100, p.
Siebert, Lee, and Simkin, Thomas, 2002, Volcanoes of the world—An illustrated catalog of
Holocene volcanoes and their eruptions: Smithsonian Institution, Global Volcanism Program
Digital Information series, GVP-3. Accessed Jan. 9, 2007 at
Tarr, A C., Villasenor, Antonio, Furlong, K.P., Rhea, Susan, and Benz, H.M., 2010, Seismicity of the
Earth 1900-2007: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Map 3064, scale 1:25,000,000.
Available at http://pubs.usgs.gov/sim/3064/.
“Tracking Greenhouse Gasses”, an Inventory Manual. Published under the Philippines: Enabling
Activities for the Preparation of the Second National Communication on Climate Change to
the UNFCCC, A Project of the Government of the Philippines and the United Nations
Development Programme (UNDP), which serves as the Implementing Agency of the Global
Environment Facility. 2011.
Tsutsumi, H. and Perez, J.S., 2013. Large-scale active fault map of the Philippine fault based on
aerial photograph and interpretation. Active Fault Research, 39, 29-37.
Updated Projected Mid-Year Population Based on 2015 POPCEN by Five- Year Age Group,
Sex, Single-Calendar Year and by Province: 2015 – 2025
W.H.K., Kanamori, Hiroo, Jennings, PC., and Kisslinger, Carl, eds., International Handbook of
Earthquake and Engineering Seismology, v. 81(A), chap. 41, p. 1-26.
Yasuhiro, Yoshida, and Katsuyuki, Abe, 1992, Source mechanism of the Luzon, Philippines
Earthquake of July 16, 1990: Geophysical Research Letters, v. 19, no. 6, p. 545-548, doi:
10.1029/91GL02467.