Performance Indicators

Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T
Basic Education 4. Assessment 12.Communica JUNE 2019 - Quality Consistently Frequently showed Occasionally Rarely showed No acceptable 5 5 5 5 0.375
Services and Reporting ted promptly and MARCH showed prompt and prompt and clear showed prompt and prompt and clear evidence was
clearly the 2020 clear communication of clear communication of shown
learners’ needs, communication of the learners’ needs, communication of the learners’ needs,
progress and the learners’ needs, progress and the learners’ needs, progress and
achievement to progress and achievement to key progress and achievement to key
key stakeholders, achievement to key stakeholders, achievement to key stakeholders,
including parents/ stakeholders, including parents/ stakeholders, including parents/
guardians. including parents/ guardians as shown including parents/ guardians as shown
guardians as shown in the MOV guardians as shown in the MOV
7.5% in the MOV submitted in the MOV submitted
submitted submitted

Efficiency Submitted a Submitted a Submitted a Submitted any 1 of No acceptable

combination of at combination of 3 of combination of 2 of the given MOV evidence was
least 4 of the the acceptable the acceptable shown
acceptable MOV MOV MOV
Timeliness Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV No acceptable
were distributed were distributed were distributed was completed in evidence was
across 4 quarters across 3 quarters across 2 quarters only 1 quarter shown
Basic Education 5. Plus Factor 13. Performed JUNE 2019 - Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely performed No acceptable 3 3 3.000 0.300
Services various related MARCH performed various performed various performed various various related evidence was
works/activities 2020 related related related work/activities that shown
that contribute to work/activities that work/activities that work/activities that contribute to the
the teaching- contribute to the contribute to the contribute to the teaching learning
learning process. teaching learning teaching learning teaching learning process as shown
process as shown process as shown process as shown in the MOV
10% in the MOV in the MOV in the MOV submitted
submitted submitted submitted

Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted any 1 of No acceptable

different kinds of different kinds of different kinds of the acceptable evidence was
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV MOV shown
Timeliness
RATING FOR OVER-ALL
Very Satisfactory 4.460
ACCOMPLISHMENTS
ADJECTIVAL RATING EQUIVALENCIES
RANGE ADJECTIVAL RATING
4.500-5.000 Outstanding
3.500-4.499 Very Satisfactory
2.500-3.499 Satisfactory
1.500-2.499 Unsatisfactory ANTONIO S. OCA LEA D. SANCON NEMEFLOR M. GUMOBAO
below 1.499 Poor Ratee Rater Approving Authority
 INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) SUMMARY SHEET
Teacher I-III (Proficient Teacher)

Name of Employee: ANTONIO S. OCA Name of Rater: LEA D. SANCON

Position: TEACHER III Position: MASTER TEACHER I
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: LAGUNA Date of Review: November 2018
Rating Period: JUNE 2019 - MARCH 2020

Weight per Weight per Numerical Ratings

KRA Objectives Score
KRA Objective
Q E T Ave
Objective 1 7.5% 5 4 4.500 0.337
KRA 1 22.5% Objective 2 7.5% 5 4 4.500 0.337
Objective 3 7.5% 4 4 4.000 0.300
Objective 4 7.5% 4 4 4.000 0.300
KRA 2 22.5% Objective 5 7.5% 5 5 5.000 0.375
Objective 6 7.5% 5 5 5.000 0.375
Objective 7 7.5% 5 4 4.500 0.337
KRA 3 22.5% Objective 8 7.5% 5 5 5.000 0.375
Objective 9 7.5% 5 4 4.500 0.337
Objective 10 7.5% 4 5 4.500 0.337
KRA 4 22.5% Objective 11 7.5% 5 5 5 5.000 0.375
Objective 12 7.5% 5 5 5 5.000 0.375
Plus Factor 10% Objective 13 10% 3 3 3.000 0.300
Final Rating 4.460
Adjectival Rating Very Satisfactory

ANTONIO S. OCA LEA D. SANCON NEMEFLOR M. GUMOBAO

Ratee Rater Approving Authority
 INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) fo

Name of Employee: NAME OF RATEE Name of Rater:

Position: Position:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: Date of Review:
Rating Period:

TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING

Performance Indicators
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3)
Basic Education 1. Content 1. Modeled effective Quality
Services Knowledge and applications of content Modeled effective Modeled effective Modeled effective
Pedagogy knowledge within and applications of applications of applications of
across curriculum content knowledge content knowledge content knowledge
teaching areas. within and across within and across within and across
curriculum teaching curriculum teaching curriculum teaching
areas as shown in areas as shown in areas as shown in
MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating
of 8 of 7 of 6
7.5%
Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2
lessons as lessons as lessons as
evidenced by MOV evidenced by MOV evidenced by MOV
1 and supported by 1 from colleagues 1 from colleagues
any 1 of the other and supported by and supported by
MOV given any 1 of the other any 1 of the other
MOV given MOV given
Timeliness
Basic Education 2. Collaborated with Quality Conducted, Conducted and Conducted action
Services colleagues in the completed and completed action research with
conduct and application disseminated action research with colleagues
of research to enrich research with colleagues
knowledge of content colleagues
and pedagogy.
Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted any 3 of Submitted any 2
7.5%
of the given MOV the acceptable MOV
MOV
Timeliness Presented the Completed the Conducted the
research report research report research report
within the rating within the rating within the rating
period period period

Performance Indicators
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3)
Basic Education 1. Content 3. Developed and Quality Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated
Services Knowledge and applied effective effective teaching effective teaching effective teaching
Pedagogy teaching strategies to strategies to strategies to strategies to
promote critical and promote critical and promote critical and promote critical and
creative thinking, as well creative thinking, as creative thinking, as creative thinking, as
as other higher-order well as other higher- well as other higher- well as other higher-
thinking skills. order thinking skills order thinking skills order thinking skills
as shown in MOV 1 as shown in MOV 1 as shown in MOV 1
with a rating of 8 with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6
7.5%
 7.5%
Efficiency Submitted 4 or Submitted 3 Submitted 2
more lessons as lessons as evidently lessons as evidently
evidently shown in shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
MOV 1 and and supported by and supported by
supported by any 1 any 1 of the other any 1 of the other
of the other MOV MOV given MOV given
given
Timeliness
Basic Education 2. Learning 4. Worked with Quality
Services Environment and colleagues to model and Modeled and Modeled and Modeled and
Diversity of share effective shared effective shared effective shared effective
Learners techniques in the classroom classroom classroom
management of management management management
classroom structure to strategies that strategies that strategies that
engage learners, engage learners in engage learners in engage learners in
individually or in groups, activities/ tasks activities/ tasks activities/ tasks
in meaningful done in different done in different done in different
exploration, discovery physical learning physical learning physical learning
7.5%
and hands-on activities environments as environments as environments as
within a range of shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
physical learning with a rating of 8 with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6
environments.environme Efficiency
nts. Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2
lessons supported lessons supported lessons supported
by MOV 1 and any by MOV 1 and any by MOV 1 and any
1 of the other 1 of the other 1 of the other
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV
Timeliness

Performance Indicators
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3)
Basic Education 2. Learning 5. Exhibited effective Quality Exhibited effective Exhibited effective Exhibited effective
Services Environment and and constructive and constructive and constructive and constructive
Diversity of behavior management behavior behavior behavior
Learners skills by applying management skills management skills management skills
positive and non-violent by applying positive by applying positive by applying positive
discipline to ensure and non-violent and non-violent and non-violent
learning-focused discipline to ensure discipline to ensure discipline to ensure
environments. learning-focused learning-focused learning-focused
environments environments environments
7.5% shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
with a rating of 8 with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6

Efficiency Applied at least 7 of Applied at least 7 of Applied at least 7 of

the given strategies the given strategies the given strategies
as observed in at as observed in 3 as observed in 2
least 4 lessons lessons lessons
Timeliness
Basic Education 6. Worked with Quality Worked with Worked with Worked with
Services colleagues to share colleagues at least colleagues in the colleagues but no
differentiated, in the department or evidence of sharing
developmentally district/cluster level grade level to share with others
appropriate to share lesson lesson
opportunities to address
Efficiency Submitted at least 1 Submitted at least 1 Submitted at least 1
learners’ differences in 7.5%
lesson as evidently lesson as evidently lesson as evidently
gender, needs,
shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
strengths, interests and
and supported by and supported by and supported by
experiences.
any acceptable any acceptable any acceptable
 Efficiency Submitted at least 1 Submitted at least 1 Submitted at least 1
learners’ differences in 7.5%
lesson as evidently lesson as evidently lesson as evidently
gender, needs,
shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
strengths, interests and
and supported by and supported by and supported by
experiences.
any acceptable any acceptable any acceptable
MOV MOV MOV
Timeliness
Basic Education 3. Curriculum and 7. Developed and Quality Developed and Developed and Developed and
Services Planning applied effective applied effective applied effective applied effective
strategies in the strategies showing strategies showing strategies showing
planning and developmentally- developmentally- developmentally-
management of sequenced teaching sequenced teaching sequenced teaching
developmentally and learning and learning and learning
sequenced teaching and process as shown process as shown process as shown
learning processes to in MOV 1 with a in MOV 1 with a in MOV 1 with a
meet curriculum rating of 8 rating of 7 rating of 6
requirements and varied 7.5%
teaching contexts. Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 2-3 Submitted 1 lesson
lessons as lessons as as evidenced by
evidenced by MOV evidenced by MOV shown in MOV 1
1 and 2 and 1 and 2 and and/or 2 and
supported by any 1 supported by any 1 supported by any 1
of the other of the other of the other
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV
Timeliness

Performance Indicators
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3)
Basic Education 3. Curriculum and 8. Reviewed with Quality Consistently Frequently led Occasionally led
Services Planning colleagues, teacher and participated in collaborative collaborative
learner feedback to plan, LACs/FGDs/meetin reviews of teacher reviews of teacher
facilitate and enrich gs to discuss and learner and learner
teaching practice. teacher/learner feedback as feedback as
feedback to enrich evidenced by the evidenced by the
instruction as MOV submitted MOV submitted
shown in the MOV
submitted

7.5% Efficiency Submitted 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2

collaborative collaborative collaborative
reviews of teacher reviews of teacher reviews of teacher
and learner and learner and learner
feedback as feedback as feedback as
evidently shown in evidently shown in evidently shown in
MOV 1 and MOV 1 and MOV 1 and
supported by any 1 supported by any 1 supported by any 1
of the acceptable of the acceptable of the acceptable
MOV MOV MOV

Timeliness
Basic Education 9. Advised and guided Quality Consistently Frequently advised Occasionally
Services colleagues in the advised colleagues colleagues in the advised colleagues
selection, organization, in the selection, selection, in the selection,
development and use of organization, organization, organization,
appropriate teaching development and development and development and
and learning resources, appropriate use of appropriate use of appropriate use of
including ICT, to teaching and teaching and teaching and
address specific learning learning resources learning resources learning resources
goals. as shown in the as shown in the as shown in the
7.5% MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted

Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2

teaching and teaching and teaching and
learning resources learning resources learning resources
as evidenced by at as evidenced by at as evidenced by at
least 1 of the least 1 of the least 1 of the
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV
Timeliness
Basic Education 4. Assessment 10. Worked Quality Consistently Frequently reviewed Occasionally
Services and Reporting collaboratively with reviewed collaboratively reviewed
colleagues to review the collaboratively assessment tools collaboratively
design, selection, assessment tools with colleagues as assessment tools
Basic Education 4. Assessment 10. Worked Quality Consistently Frequently reviewed Occasionally
Services and Reporting collaboratively with reviewed collaboratively reviewed
colleagues to review the collaboratively assessment tools collaboratively
design, selection, assessment tools with colleagues as assessment tools
organization and use of with colleagues as shown in the MOV with colleagues as
a range of effective shown in the MOV submitted shown in the MOV
diagnostic, formative 7.5% submitted submitted
and summative
assessment strategies Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2
consistent with assessment tools assessment tools assessment tools
curriculum requirements. as evidently shown as evidently shown as evidently shown
in any of the in any of the in any of the
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV
Timeliness
Performance Indicators
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3)
Basic Education 4. Assessment 11. Interpreted Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally
Services and Reporting collaboratively collaborated with collaborated with collaborated with
monitoring and colleagues in the colleagues in the colleagues in the
evaluation strategies of interpretation of interpretation of interpretation of
attainment data to assessment data as assessment data as assessment data as
support learner progress shown in the MOV shown in the MOV shown in the MOV
7.5%
and achievement. submitted submitted submitted
Efficiency Submitted at least 2 Submitted at least 3 Submitted at least 2
different types of of the same kind of of the same kind of
MOV MOV MOV
Timeliness
Basic Education 12. Applied skills in the Quality Consistently applied Frequently applied Occasionally
Services effective communication skills in the effective skills in the effective applied skills in the
of learner needs, communication of communication of effective
progress and learner needs and learner needs and communication of
achievement to key progress to parents/ progress to parents/ learner needs and
stakeholders, including guardians as shown guardians as shown progress to parents/
parents/guardians. in the MOV in the MOV guardians as shown
7.5% submitted submitted in the MOV
submitted

Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted any 3 Submitted any 2

of the acceptable MOV MOV
MOV
Timeliness
Basic Education 5. Plus Factor 13. Performed various Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally
Services related works/activities performed special performed special performed special
that contribute to the tasks and/or tasks and/or tasks and/or
teaching-learning assignments as assignments as assignments as
process. shown in the MOV shown in the MOV shown in the MOV
10% submitted submitted submitted
Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted only 3 Submitted only 2
different kinds of different kinds of different kinds of
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV
Timeliness

ADJECTIVAL RATING EQUIVALENCIES

RANGE ADJECTIVAL RATING
4.500-5.000 Outstanding
3.500-4.499 Very Satisfactory
2.500-3.499 Satisfactory
1.500-2.499 Unsatisfactory NAME OF RATEE NAME O
below 1.499 Poor Ratee Ra
NT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) for Master Teacher I-IV

NAME OF RATER

NG TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION

Performance Indicators
Rating
Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
(2) (1) Q E T
No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Modeled effective evidence was
applications of shown
content knowledge
within and across
curriculum teaching
areas as shown in
MOV 1 with a rating
of 5
Submitted 1 lesson No acceptable
as evidenced by evidence was
MOV 1 from shown
colleagues and
supported by any 1
of the other MOV
given

Proposedaction No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!

research with evidence was
colleagues shown

Submitted any 1 No acceptable

MOV evidence was
shown
Proposed the No acceptable
research report evidence was
within the rating shown
period

Performance Indicators
Rating
Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
(2) (1) Q E T
Demonstrated No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
effective teaching evidence was
strategies to shown
promote critical and
creative thinking, as
well as other higher-
order thinking skills
as shown in MOV 1
with a rating of 5
 Submitted 1 lesson No acceptable
as evidently shown evidence was
in MOV 1 and shown
supported by any of
the other MOV
given

No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!

Modeled and evidence was
shared effective shown
classroom
management
strategies that
engage learners in
activities/ tasks
done in different
physical learning
environments as
shown in MOV 1
with a rating of 5
Submitted 1 lesson No acceptable
supported by any of evidence was
the acceptable shown
MOV

Performance Indicators
Rating
Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
(2) (1) Q E T
Exhibited effective No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
and constructive evidence was
behavior shown
management skills
by applying positive
and non-violent
discipline to ensure
learning-focused
environments
shown in MOV 1
with a rating of 5

Applied any of the No acceptable

given strategies as evidence was
observed in only 1 shown
lesson

Worked with No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!

colleagues but no evidence was
evidence of sharing shown
with others

Submitted at least 1 No acceptable

lesson, as evidence was
evidenced by either shown
MOV 2 or 3 but no
evidence of sharing
 Submitted at least 1 No acceptable
lesson, as evidence was
evidenced by either shown
MOV 2 or 3 but no
evidence of sharing
with others

Developed and No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!

applied effective evidence was
strategies showing shown
developmentally-
sequenced teaching
and learning
process as shown
in MOV 1 with a
rating of 5

Submitted 1 lesson No acceptable

as evidenced by evidence was
any 1 of the shown
acceptable MOV

Performance Indicators
Rating
Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
(2) (1) Q E T
Rarely led No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
collaborative evidence was
reviews of teacher shown
and learner
feedback as
evidenced by the
MOV submitted

Submitted 1 No acceptable
collaborative review evidence was
of teacher and shown
learner feedback as
evidently shown in
any of the
acceptable MOV

Rarely advised No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!

colleagues in the evidence was
selection, shown
organization,
development and
appropriate use of
teaching and
learning resources
as shown in the
MOV submitted

Submitted 1 No acceptable
teaching and evidence was
learning resource shown
as evidenced by
any of the
acceptable MOV

Rarely reviewed No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!

collaboratively evidence was
assessment tools shown
with colleagues as
 Rarely reviewed No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
collaboratively evidence was
assessment tools shown
with colleagues as
shown in the MOV
submitted

Submitted 1 No acceptable
assessment tool as evidence was
evidently shown in shown
any of the
acceptable MOV

Performance Indicators
Rating
Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
(2) (1) Q E T
Rarely collaborated No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
with colleagues in evidence was
the interpretation of shown
assessment data as
shown in the MOV
submitted

Submitted any 1 of No acceptable

the MOV evidence was
shown

Rarely applied skills No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!

in the effective evidence was
communication of shown
learner needs and
progress to parents/
guardians as shown
in the MOV
submitted

Submitted any 1
MOV

Rarely performed No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!

special tasks and/or evidence was
assignments as shown
shown in the MOV
submitted

Submitted any 1 of No acceptable

the acceptable evidence was
MOV shown

RATING FOR OVER-ALL

#DIV/0! #DIV/0!
ACCOMPLISHMENTS

NAME OF RATER NAME OF THE APPROVING AUTHORITY

Rater Approving Authority
 INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT REVIEW FORM (I
Master Teacher I-IV (Highly Proficient Teach

Name of Employee: JULIE MAE KRISTEL I. MALAPAYA

Position: TEACHER I
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: LAGUNA
Rating Period: JUNE 2019 - MARCH 2020

Weight per Weight per Numeri

KRA Objectives
KRA Objective Q
Objective 1 7.5% 0
KRA 1 22.5% Objective 2 7.5% 0
Objective 3 7.5% 0
Objective 4 7.5% 0
KRA 2 22.5% Objective 5 7.5% 0
Objective 6 7.5% 0
Objective 7 7.5% 0
KRA 3 22.5% Objective 8 7.5% 0
Objective 9 7.5% 0
Objective 10 7.5% 0
KRA 4 22.5% Objective 11 7.5% 0
Objective 12 7.5% 0
Plus Factor 10% Objective 13 10% 0

NAME OF THE RATEE NAME OF RATER

Ratee Rater
EVIEW FORM (IPCRF) SUMMARY SHEET
y Proficient Teacher)

Name of Rater: LEA D. SANCON

Position: MASTER TEACHER I
Date of Review: Oct-19

Numerical Ratings
Score
E T Ave
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Final Rating #DIV/0!
Adjectival Rating #DIV/0!

NAME OF RATER NAME OF APPROVING AUTHORITY

Rater Approving Authority