% Score % Score

0.00% 1 0.00% 4
5.00% 2 5.00% 3
10.00% 3 10.00% 2
20.00% 4 20.00% 1

H Hazard/Likelihood Score Risk = HEV, where V = S/Ac

E Exposure Score SevCon = EV
S Sensitivity Score
Ac Adaptive Capacity Score
V Vulnerability Score (Sensitivity and Adaptive Capacity)
SevCon Severity of Consequence Score (Exposure and Vulnerability)
R Risk Score

Indicative Likelihood of Occurrence Scores

Measures of
Return Period in Years Likelihood Score
Likelihood
Frequent Every 1-3 years 6
Moderate Every >3-10 years 5
Occasional Every >10-30 years 4
Improbable Every >30-100 years 3
Rare event Every >100-200 years 2
Very rare event
Source: Reference Manual on Mainstreaming Disaster
Every >200 years Risk Reduction and
1 Climate
Change Adaptation in the Comprehensive Land Use Plans Report, NEDA-HLURB-UNDP
,2012

Risk Scores

Severity of Consequence Score (EV)

Indicative Likelihood Likelihood of
of Occurrence Occurrence Score Very High High Moderate
4 3 2
Frequent
(1-3 Years) 6 24 18 12

Moderate
5 20 15 10
(4-10 Years)
Occasional Slight
Chance 4 16 12 8
(11-30 Years)
Improbable
3 12 9 6
(31-100 Years)
Rare
2 8 6 4
(101-200 Years)
Very Rare
1 4 3 2
(>200 Years)
>12 High Risk Areas
5-12 Moderate Risk Areas
5< Low Risk Areas
 % Score
Low 4
Moderate 3
High 2
Very High 1

ere V = S/Ac

core (EV)
Low
1

1
AND RISKS BY BARANGAY AND BY TYPE OF SUSCEPTIBILITY
Barangay HAZARD

Hazard Susceptibility/ Intensity

Low, Moderate, High/ Inundation Depth

Barangay Storm Surge Susceptibility/ Intensity

20 Moderate
21 Moderate
22 High
23 Moderate
24 Low
25 Moderate
26 Low
27 Moderate
28 Moderate
AGUSAN Low
BAYABAS Moderate
BONBON Low
BUGO Low
BULUA Moderate
CARMEN HIgh
CONSOLACION HIgh
CUGMAN Moderate
GUSA Moderate
IPONAN Moderate
KAUSWAGAN Moderate
LAPASAN High
MACABALAN High
PUERTO Low
PUNTOD Moderate
TABLON Moderate
 EXPOSURE

Likelihood of Occurrence Score Expected Inundation Depth Barangay Population

Thru Anecdotal Account Depth according to hazard map Total Population of the brgy
(Score range 1-6) (PSA, CBMS)

Likelihood of Occurrence Score Expected Inundation Depth Barangay Population

5 0.5 - 1.5 69
5 0.5 - 1.5 535
6 1.5 Above 2192
5 0.5 - 1.5 928
4 0.1 - 0.5 795
5 0.5 - 1.5 1113
4 0.1 - 0.5 2621
5 0.5 - 1.5 1610
5 0.5 - 1.5 536
4 0.1 - 0.5 1170
5 0.5 - 1.5 16261
4 0.1 - 0.5 13670
4 0.1 - 0.5 9573
5 0.5 - 1.5 30893
6 1.5 Above 32348
6 1.5 Above 70492
5 0.5 - 1.5 10433
5 0.5 - 1.5 22383
5 0.5 - 1.5 26340
5 0.5 - 1.5 35069
6 1.5 Above 43611
6 1.5 Above 20721
4 0.1 - 0.5 14318
5 0.5 - 1.5 18796
5 0.5 - 1.5 23004
 Number of HH Barangay Residential Area Residential Population Density

Number of HH of the Total land area of residential land uses Total population divided by brgy residential
brgy (PSA, CBMS) of the brgy (hectares) area

Number of HH Barangay Residential Area Residential Population Density

32 2.10 33
82 4.72 113
444 11.79 186
215 8.25 112
243 11.83 67
324 5.23 213
574 8.85 296
292 9.79 164
125 7.25 74
338 19.67 59
3438 512.69 32
2959 177.17 77
2093 116.28 82
6303 807.31 38
7036 661.21 49
15360 956.65 74
2435 49.45 211
4538 1747.61 13
4838 607.14 43
7598 512.53 68
9624 227.26 192
4470 45.15 459
2518 887.99 16
4366 164.90 114
4685 4381.01 5
Affected Residential Area Affected HH Affected Population Exposure Percentage

Affected population Affected Pop'n divided by Total

Calculated land area exposed to divided average Calculated land area exposed Pop;n of the barangay multiply
hazard areas (hectares) household size to hazard areas (hectares) by 100

Affected Residential Area Affected HH Affected Population Exposure Percentage

0.17920122175 0.973913043478 6 8.70%

1.66571866886 0.723439252336 189 35.33%
3.37787296398 2.388120437956 628 28.65%
1.99694548086 1.911368534483 225 24.25%
1.39094970709 3.615962264151 93 11.70%
2.19700208429 1.522479784367 468 42.05%
2.14567099981 1.938153376574 635 24.23%
0.47134945034 1.775577639752 78 4.84%
0.61758575186 1.690764925373 46 8.58%
0.37983797214 5.682444444444 23 1.97%
10.61572370660 108.3960531333 337 2.07%
22.96221193660 38.35011192392 1772 12.96%
14.89422124220 25.4229645879 1226 12.81%
12.90035996020 164.7128776746 494 1.60%
15.75906257770 143.8195115618 771 2.38%
0.19894704713 208.4512285082 15 0.02%
8.92416906772 11.54133518643 1883 18.05%
16.75675855010 354.3159621141 215 0.96%
28.20242217900 111.5164510251 1086 4.12%
1.40139478371 111.0440257778 61 0.17%
52.80536798720 50.15134346839 3613 8.28%
41.23185968340 9.739901549153 7912 38.18%
15.63037409330 156.1641863389 7173 50.10%
5.00606078404 38.30354330709 81 0.43%
20.16013086570 892.2375173883 2298 9.99%
 SENSITIVITY

Percentage of Informal
Exposure Score
Settlers (IS)

Exposure Score Number of exposed IS No. of HH accounted as IS divided affected HH

Exposure Score Number of exposed IS Percentage of Informal Settlers (IS)

2 0 0.00%
4 0 0.00%
4 4 167.50%
4 1 52.32%
3 2 55.31%
4 1 65.68%
4 8 412.76%
1 2 112.64%
2 1 59.14%
1 12 211.18%
1 13 11.99%
3 14 36.51%
3 15 59.00%
1 16 9.71%
1 17 11.82%
1 18 8.64%
3 19 164.63%
1 20 5.64%
1 22 19.73%
1 23 20.71%
2 24 47.86%
4 25 256.68%
4 26 16.65%
1 27 70.49%
2 28 3.14%
 Percentage living in dwelling units made from
light materials or salvageable materials

Sensitivity Score No.of exposed HH living in light materials

Sensitivity Score 1 No.of exposed HH living in light materials

1 2
1 3
4 5
4 2
4 5
4 3
4 4
4 5
4 5
4 13
3 16
4 20
4 5
2 23
3 31
2 120
4 57
2 38
3 34
4 28
4 58
4 127
3 56
4 20
1 15
 No. of accounted HH divided by affected HH

Percentage living in dwelling units made from light materials or salvageable materials

205.36%
414.69%
209.37%
104.64%
138.28%
197.05%
206.38%
281.60%
295.72%
228.77%
14.76%
52.15%
19.67%
13.96%
21.55%
57.57%
493.88%
10.72%
30.49%
25.22%
115.65%
1303.91%
35.86%
52.21%
1.68%
 Percentage of young and old dependents

Sensitivity Score No. of exposed young and old dependents

Sensitivity Score 2 No. of exposed young and old dependents

4 10
4 20
4 1420
4 345
4 514
4 679
4 1345
4 105
4 289
4 980
3 1346
4 10980
3 7621
3 24567
4 20176
4 59031
4 6345
3 18912
4 17628
4 16201
4 32679
4 15678
4 7832
4 11247
1 14281
 Percentage of persons
with disabilities

No. of accounted individuals divided by affected population Sensitivity Score No. of exposed PWDs

Percentage of young and old dependents Sensitivity Score 3 No. of exposed PWDs

166.67% 4 0
10.58% 3 0
226.11% 4 0
153.33% 4 0
552.69% 4 0
145.09% 4 0
211.81% 4 0
134.62% 4 0
628.26% 4 0
4260.87% 4 410
399.41% 4 233
619.64% 4 244
621.62% 4 140
4973.08% 4 135
2616.86% 4 282
393540.00% 4 135
336.96% 4 164
8796.28% 4 192
1623.20% 4 264
26559.02% 4 237
904.48% 4 241
198.15% 4 180
109.19% 4 158
13885.19% 4 299
621.45% 4 250
No. of accounted individuals divided by affected Sensitivity Score
population

Percentage of persons with disabilities Sensitivity Score 4

0.00% 1
0.00% 1
0.00% 1
0.00% 1
0.00% 1
0.00% 1
0.00% 1
0.00% 1
0.00% 1
1782.61% 4
69.14% 4
13.77% 3
11.42% 3
27.33% 4
36.58% 4
900.00% 4
8.71% 2
89.30% 4
24.31% 4
388.52% 4
6.67% 2
2.28% 1
2.20% 1
369.14% 4
10.88% 3
 Percentage below the Poverty Threshold

No.of exposed HH living below Poverty Threshold No. of accounted HH divided by affected HH

No.of exposed HH living below Poverty Threshold Percentage below the Poverty Threshold

5 513.39%
6 829.37%
8 334.99%
5 261.59%
8 221.24%
6 394.09%
7 361.17%
8 450.56%
8 473.16%
15 263.97%
9 8.30%
12 31.29%
8 31.47%
13 7.89%
9 6.26%
10 4.80%
11 95.31%
15 4.23%
13 11.66%
18 16.21%
14 27.92%
15 154.01%
16 10.25%
20 52.21%
30 3.36%
 Percentage Malnourished Individuals

Sensitivity Score No. of exposed malnou-rished individuals

Sensitivity Score 5 No. of exposed malnourished individuals

4 45
4 67
4 40
4 45
4 43
4 56
4 35
4 32
4 34
4 36
2 42
4 32
4 31
2 38
2 45
1 46
4 47
1 34
3 38
3 56
4 78
4 80
3 56
4 78
1 89
No. of accounted individuals divided by affected Sensitivity Score
population

Percentage Malnourished Individuals Sensitivity Score 6

750.00% 4
35.45% 4
6.37% 2
20.00% 4
46.24% 4
11.97% 3
5.51% 2
41.03% 4
73.91% 4
156.52% 4
12.46% 3
1.81% 1
2.53% 1
7.69% 2
5.84% 2
306.67% 4
2.50% 1
15.81% 3
3.50% 1
91.80% 4
2.16% 1
1.01% 1
0.78% 1
96.30% 4
3.87% 1
 ADAPTIVE CAPACITY

Access to infrastructure-related mitigation measures

Proportion of HH with access to measures Adaptive Capacity Score

Access to infrastructure-related mitigation measures Adaptive Capacity Score 1

22 1
62 1
256 1
189 1
243 1
324 1
574 1
292 1
125 1
300 1
3438 1
2959 1
2093 1
6303 1
7036 1
15360 1
2435 1
4538 1
4838 1
7598 1
9624 1
4470 1
2518 1
4366 1
4685 1
 Access to financial assistance

Proportion of HH with access to financial Adaptive Capacity Score

assistance

Access to financial assistance Adaptive Capacity Score 2

15.00% 2
115.00% 1
215.00% 1
315.00% 1
415.00% 1
515.00% 1
615.00% 1
715.00% 1
815.00% 1
915.00% 1
1015.00% 1
1115.00% 1
1215.00% 1
1315.00% 1
1415.00% 1
1515.00% 1
1615.00% 1
1715.00% 1
1915.00% 1
2015.00% 1
2115.00% 1
2215.00% 1
2315.00% 1
2415.00% 1
2515.00% 1
Capacity and willingness to retrofit or relocate

Proportion of HH that are capable/ willing Adaptive Capacity Score

Capacity and willingness to retrofit or relocate Adaptive Capacity Score 3

22 1
62 1
256 1
189 1
243 1
324 1
574 1
292 1
125 1
300 1
3438 1
2959 1
2093 1
6303 1
7036 1
15360 1
2435 1
4538 1
4838 1
7598 1
9624 1
4470 1
2518 1
4366 1
4685 1
 Access to information Government investments

Capacity of government to make

Proportion of HH with access to Adaptive Capacity Score investments in CCA-DRR (low,
information moderate, high, very high)

Access to information Adaptive Capacity Score 4 Government investments

22 1 3
62 1 3
256 1 3
189 1 3
243 1 3
324 1 3
574 1 3
292 1 3
125 1 3
300 1 2
3438 1 3
2959 1 2
2093 1 2
6303 1 2
7036 1 2
15360 1 2
2435 1 2
4538 1 2
4838 1 2
7598 1 2
9624 1 2
4470 1 1
2518 1 2
4366 1 2
4685 1 2
 Vulnerability Score Severity of Consequence Score

Average Sensitivity Score plus

Adaptive Capacity Score Average Adaptive Capacity Exposure Score plus Vulnerability Score divided
Score divided by 2 by 2

Adaptive Capacity Score 5 Vulnerability Score Severity of Consequence Score

1 2.10 2.05
1 1.92 2.96
1 2.08 3.04
1 2.25 3.13
1 2.25 2.63
1 2.17 3.08
1 2.08 3.04
1 2.25 1.63
1 2.25 2.13
1 2.50 1.75
1 2.08 1.54
1 2.17 2.58
1 2.08 2.54
1 1.92 1.46
1 2.08 1.54
1 2.08 1.54
1 2.08 2.54
1 1.92 1.46
1 2.08 1.54
1 2.42 1.71
1 2.08 2.04
1 2.00 3.00
1 1.83 2.92
1 2.50 1.75
1 1.42 1.71
 Risk
Risk Score
Category

Severity of
Consequence
multiply see Scoring Tab
to likelihood
of Occurrence

Risk
Risk Score
Category

10.25 moderate
14.79 high
18.25 high
15.63 high
10.50 moderate
15.42 high
12.17 high
8.13 moderate
10.63 moderate
7.00 moderate
7.71 moderate
10.33 moderate
10.17 moderate
7.29 moderate
9.25 moderate
9.25 moderate
12.71 high
7.29 moderate
7.71 moderate
8.54 moderate
12.25 high
18.00 high
11.67 moderate
8.75 moderate
8.54 moderate
 Popula
Populati on Risk Scores
TABLON
PUERTO 14000

LAPASAN 12000

IPONAN 10000
7912
CUGMAN 7173
8000
moderate
CARMEN Risk 6000
BUGO Category high
4000
BAYABAS
2000
28
0
26 O
L AN RT S AN
E
24 A BA PU PA
AC LA
22 M

20
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20

Populati on Exposure per Risk Categor y Popua

16000
14326
14043 20
14000 18
16
12000
14
10000 12
7912 10
7173 Risk
8000 Category high 8
moderate
6000 6
3613 4
4000
2298 2
1883 1772
2000 1226 1086 0
771 635
y 22
ga LA
N
0 ran B A
B a A
26 t AC
N T O N N AN N O N EN ul
LA ER AS
A
B LO M BO BU
G NA M Re
s M
BA PU P TA G N
IP
O
CA
R l
A LA CU BO ta
AC To
M
 Populati on Expos ure and Like lihood of Populati on Vulner a
St orm Surge Occuring per Ind
140.00

14000 12296 120.00

12000 10806
100.00
10000
7912
7173 80.00
8000
5267
6000 60.00
3613
4000 2298 1883 1772 40.00
1226 1086 771 635
2000
20.00
0
O N AN N 26 lt
A N
RT AN LO BO GO AN EN su
AL E
PA
S B G M N BU ON R M
lR
e 0.00
B PU TA CU BO IP CA ta y
CA LA ga ON TO
D TO AN N
M
A To a n BL N ER L SA A
r A U A A
Ba T PU P AB LAP W
Likelihood of Occurrence 5 AC A US
M K
Score 4
6

Popuati on Vulne rability and Ris k Score s Populati on Vulne

per In
20 2.5 4.5
18 4
16 2
3.5
14
12 1.5 3
10
2.5
8 1
6 2
4 0.5 1.5
2
1
0 0
y 22 23 25 21 26 28
ga N AN N TO
an A LA M A SA ER 0.5
a r B G P PU
B A CU LA
AC 0
M y
ga 21 22 23 TO 25
Data Column C ran ER
B a PU
 Populati on Vulner ability and Sensiti v ity Scor es
per Indicator Population Vulnerab
per I

Data Column C
20

Column D BONBON

25

y N D O N N SA
ga LO NTO ERT
N N
LA AS A AGA ONA GU AN ON
B A G M ACI
TA PU PU
AB LAP W IP CU S O
L
AC A US N
28
M K CO

27

Populati on Vulnerability and Exposur e Scores 24

per Indicator

23

KAUSWAGAN

Data Column C Column D

AGUSAN

PUNTOD

Barangay
21 22 23 TO 25 26 N GO AN N 24
E R
A LA BU M N BO
PU G 0 1000 2000 3000 40
CAB CU BO
A
M
ulation Vulnerability and Adaptive Capacity Scores
per Indicator

Column E Column D

Column C Data

1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000

Average of Risk Score Risk Category
Barangay high moderate Total Result
20 10.25 10.25
21 14.79 14.79
22 18.25 18.25
23 15.63 15.63
24 10.50 10.50
25 15.42 15.42
26 12.17 12.17
27 8.13 8.13
28 10.63 10.63
AGUSAN 7.00 7.00
BAYABAS 7.71 7.71
BONBON 10.33 10.33
BUGO 10.17 10.17
BULUA 7.29 7.29
CARMEN 9.25 9.25
CONSOLACION 9.25 9.25
CUGMAN 12.71 12.71
GUSA 7.29 7.29
IPONAN 7.71 7.71
KAUSWAGAN 8.54 8.54
LAPASAN 12.25 12.25
MACABALAN 18.00 18.00
PUERTO 11.67 11.67
PUNTOD 8.75 8.75
TABLON 8.54 8.54
Total Result 14.90 9.00 10.89
Average of Risk Score Risk Category Top 10 Barangays
Barangay high moderate Total Result lation
22 18.25 18.25
MACABALAN 18.00 18.00
Total Result 11.1
23 15.63 15.63
28 10.63
25 15.42 15.42 11
PUERTO
21 14.79 14.79
26 1
CUGMAN 12.71 12.71 LAPASAN 1
LAPASAN 12.25 12.25 CUGMAN
26 12.17 12.17 21
PUERTO 11.67 11.67 25
28 10.63 10.63 23
Total Result 14.90 11.15 14.15 MACABALAN
22
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
Top 10 Barangays based on Popu -
lation Risk
11.15
14.90
10.63
11.67
moderate
12.17 Risk
12.25 Category high
12.71
14.79
15.42
15.63
18.00
18.25
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
Sum of Affected Population Risk Category Top 10 Bara
Barangay
MACABALAN
high
7912
moderate Total Result
7912
ulati
16000
PUERTO 7173 7173
14000
LAPASAN 3613 3613
TABLON 2298 2298 12000

CUGMAN 1883 1883 10000 7912

7173
BONBON 1772 1772 8000
BUGO 1226 1226 6000
3613
IPONAN 1086 1086 4000 22981883 1772
CARMEN 771 771 2000
26 635 635 0
Total Result 14043 14326 28369 N TO N N N N
ALA ER AS A BLO MA NBO BU
U P A G
AB P LA T CU BO
AC
M
 Top 10 Barangays based on Pop -
ulation Exposure
14326
14043

Risk
2 Category high
7173
moderate

3613
22981883 1772 1226
1086 771 635

26 t
TO N N AN N O AN EN ul
R S A BLO M NBO BUG ON R M Re
s
UE PA A G IP l
LA T CU BO CA ta
To
Sum of Affected Population Likelihood of Occurrence Score
Barangay 4 5 6 Total Result Top 1 0 B arangay
MACABALAN 7912 7912 Expos ure and Li
PUERTO 7173 7173 S
LAPASAN 3613 3613
TABLON 2298 2298
CUGMAN 1883 1883 14000
BONBON 1772 1772 12000
BUGO 1226 1226 10000 7912
IPONAN 1086 1086 7173
8000
CARMEN 771 771 6000
3613
26 635 635 4000 2298
Total Result 10806 5267 12296 28369 2000
0
N O N
LA RT S AN LO
A E B
A B PU PA TA
AC LA C
M
 Top 1 0 B arangays base d on t he ir Popuati on
Expos ure and Like lihood of Occurre nce of
St orm Surge

000 12296
000 10806

000 7912
7173
000
5267
000
3613
000 2298 1883 1772
1226 1086 771 635
000
0
26 t
N TO N ON AN ON G O A N EN ul
LA ER AS
A
BL NB BU ON RM Re
s
B A
PU P TA GM IP l
CA LA CU BO CA ta
M
A To

Likelihood of Occurrence 5
Score 4
6
 Data
Top 1 0 Barangays
Barangay Average of Risk Score Average of Vulnerability Score
ulati on Vulne rab
22 18.25 2.08
MACABALAN 18.00 2.00
23 15.63 2.25
25 15.42 2.17 20
21 14.79 1.92 18
CUGMAN 12.71 2.08 16
LAPASAN 12.25 2.08
14
26 12.17 2.08
12
PUERTO 11.67 1.83
28 10.63 2.25 10

Total Result 14.15 2.08 8

6
4
2
0
y 22 23 25
ga LA
N
ran BA
B a A
AC
M
 Top 1 0 Barangays with Highe s t Score for Pop -
ulati on Vulne rability and the ir R is k Score s

2.5

1.5

0.5

0
y 22 23 25 21 26 O 28
N AN N
RT
LA SA
A GM PA PU
E
AB CU LA
AC
M

Data Column C
 Top 10 Barang
Data Populati on Vu
Barangay Number of exposed HH living below Povertysiti
Number of expNumber of exposed HH living vity Scores
Threshold
TABLON 28 15 30
140.00
PUNTOD 27 20 20
PUERTO 26 56 16 120.00
MACABALAN 25 127 15
LAPASAN 24 58 14 100.00
KAUSWAGAN 23 28 18
80.00
IPONAN 22 34 13
GUSA 20 38 15 60.00
CUGMAN 19 57 11
CONSOLACION 18 120 10 40.00

Total Result 23 55.3 16.2

20.00

0.00
y N D O
ga LO TO RT LA
N
ran B N E A
Ba TA PU PU AB
AC
M
 Top 10 Barangays with Highest Score for
Populati on Vulnerability and their Sen -
Povertysiti vity Scores per Indicator
Threshold

Data Column C Column D

ay N D O N N N N SA AN ON
ng B LO TO E RT LA SA GA NA GU M CI
ra TA
N
PU
A PA A
IP
O G A
PU AB LA W CU SO
L
AC A US N
M K CO
 Data Top 1
Barangay Access to InfrastAccess to Financial AssCapacity to retrofit or Average of Vulnerability Score Popul
PUNTOD 4366 2415.00% 4366 2.50 ti ve Ca
AGUSAN 300 915.00% 300 2.50
KAUSWAGAN 7598 2015.00% 7598 2.42
23 189 315.00% 189 2.25
24 243 415.00% 243 2.25
20
27 292 715.00% 292 2.25
28 125 815.00% 125 2.25 BONBON
25 324 515.00% 324 2.17
BONBON 2959 1115.00% 2959 2.17 25
20 22 15.00% 22 2.10
28
Total Result 1642 925.00% 1642 2.29
27

24

23

KAUSWAGAN

AGUSAN

PUNTOD

Barangay

0 1000 2
 Top 1 0 Barangay s w ith Highest Scor e for
Populati on Vulner ability and their Adap -
ti ve Capacity Scor es per Indicator

20

BONBON

25 Column E
Column D
28 Column C
Data
27

24

23

KAUSWAGAN

AGUSAN

PUNTOD

Barangay

0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000

 Top 1 0 Bar ang
Data lati on Vulnera
Barangay Average of VulnerabilityAverage of Severity of Con Average of Exposure Score pe
21 1.92 2.96 4 4.5
22 2.08 3.04 4 4
23 2.25 3.13 4 3.5
PUERTO 1.83 2.92 4 3
25 2.17 3.08 4
2.5
26 2.08 3.04 4
MACABALAN 2.00 3.00 4 2

BUGO 2.08 2.54 3 1.5

CUGMAN 2.08 2.54 3 1
BONBON 2.17 2.58 3 0.5
24 2.25 2.63 3
0
Total Result 2.08 2.86 3.6363636363636 ay 21 22 23 TO
g
an ER
B ar PU
 Top 1 0 Bar angays w ith Highest Scor e for Popu -
lati on Vulnerability and their Exposure Scores
per Indicator

Data Column C Column D

21 22 23 TO 25 26 N GO AN ON 24
ER LA BU M B
PU BA G ON
A CU B
AC
M