Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CWTS 11 Disaster Risk Reduction and Management 2022
CWTS 11 Disaster Risk Reduction and Management 2022
Damage
Rank Storm Season Ref.
PHP USD
Cebu 96 [89]
Philippines
Dinagat Islands 14 [114]
Leyte 1 [92]
Total 409
Methods to Control Hazards
Accident
Mitigation Preparedness
pre event
mostly back to disaster /
normal post event emergency
Rehabilitation Response
situation
stabilized
“healing”, repair,
reconstruction &
recovery
no longer direct threat to life,
safety and property
ARE WE
VULNERABLE TO
HAZARDS?
…is a thing, situation or phenomenon that poses threat
to the people, structure or economic assets and which
may cause a disaster. It could be natural or human-
made.
………. are conditions, locations, characteristics, habits
that renders a community prone to suffer from the effect
of hazards that turns into disaster.
A combination of likelihood of an occurrence
of a hazardous event with the specified
period in or in specified circumstances and
the severity of injury or damage to health of
people, property, environment or any
combination of these caused by the event.
NATURAL HAZARDS
FLOODS
EARTHQUAKES
VOLCANIC ERUPTIONS
TSUNAMI
GROUND SUBSIDENCE
GEOGRAPHICAL LOCATION OF THE PHILIPPINES
We are vulnerable to hazards
We are vulnerable to hazards
Source: PAGASA
We are vulnerable to hazards
CEBU SEISMICITY MAP (1608-2016)
DISTRIBUTION OF ACTIVE FAULTS IN CEBU
Understanding
Disasters
R = HxVxE
(C)
1. What is the hazard?
2. What are vulnerabilities?
3. What elements are at risk?
4. What constitute capacities?
5. Which one is the most at risk?
A rday
B
ocil
C agara
BASIC FIREFIGHTING
AND
FIRE PREVENTION
What is fire?
Fire is chemical reaction
accompanied by the evolution
of light and heat.
FIRE TETRAHEDRON
CLASSIFICATION OF FIRE
• CLASS A
• CLASS B
• CLASS C
• CLASS D
• CLASS K
CLASS A FIRES
• STARVATION
• SMOTHERING
• COOLING
• INHIBITION OF CHEMICAL CHAIN REACTION
STARVATION
Taking out of
fuel from the
fire triangle.
SMOTHERING
Taking out of oxygen
from the fire triangle.
FUEL
Another term used in
this procedure is
blanketing.
COOLING
CHEMICAL
CHAIN
REACTION
FUEL
(Reducing agent)
Fire Extinguisher Training
Parts of a Fire Extinguisher
Locking Pin
Discharge Hose
Pressure Gauge
Inspection Tag
Label
Cylinder
Discharge Nozzle
How to use a fire extinguisher
requirements.
CO-CHAIRMEN
Rev Fr Rouel M Sia, OAR
Rev Fr Hernando D Coja, OAR
DISASTER CONTROL
GROUP OPNS CENTER
MANINGO, Bryan C
HERMOSO JR, Ramon C
ESTRELLA, Jennifer B CASTILLO, Annie S Pacubas Personnel ALERT Members All Medica Doctors TABON, Geoffrey John P
IGLESIA, Nelbha Y ENAD, Victorio Jr A Sta Cruz Personnel JR ALERT Student Org CHIONG, Janet FUENTES, Jose Peace I
SARCHEZ, Le Roy Gerard FLORES, Antonietto P MILITAR, Roel N Student Guard Volunteers MALABANAN, Hugh B LUMAYAG, Jamaica Arbient T
LACIDA, Zoselito C BONGCALES, Marietta D PAJARES, Glenn G Other Nurses All Maintenance Personnel
VISTAL, Jonathan C MANGUIRAN, Aireen H SALAZAR, Randy K
MOLINA, Rocelyn M MATHEU, Emilio Jr D
PADUL, Elestio L PIA, Irene A
VITO, Maria Teresa V SUSADA, Jesse S
TAGSIP, Perla M
All Faculty Members
All READS
Disaster Preparedness Short
Instructional Video
BUILDING EMERGENCY
EVACUATION PLAN
Main
Campus
Main
Campus
EXIT
“B”
Main
Campus
EXIT
“A”
Main
Campus
Main
Campus
Main
Campus
EXIT
“F”
University of San Jose-Recoletos
Safety and Security Department
Cebu City
EARTHQUAKE DRILL EVALUATION SHEET
Place of Drill: Name of the Building:
Date of Drill:
Duration of Drill:
Total Number of Participants:
Quantitative Assessment of the Earthquake Drill: Rate the following Please fill-in the space provided if
parameters by putting check mark to the space provided with one (1) being the you think that your response
lowest and five (5) being the highest. needs to be qualified.
COMMENTS &
PART I – GENERAL EVALUATION: 1 2 3 4 5 OBSERVATIONS
1. The alarm system used is loud enough to be heard by all
drill participants.
2. The drill participants executed the “Duck, Cover, and Hold”
Technique during the Alarm Phase or while the alarm
system is being sounded.
3. The drill participants waited for the evacuation alarm to
start the evacuation phase.
4. The drill participants walked faster than normal during the
evacuation phase.
5. The drill participants followed their evacuation routes in
going to the evacuation area/s.
6. The drill participants covered their heads while vacating the
building and moving towards the evacuation area
7. The participants checked for any sustained injury in the
evacuation/assembly area/s.
8. A headcount was conducted while in the evacuation area.
9. The participants stayed in the evacuation area until the drill
was terminated.
EVALUATION OF THE DISASTER CONTROL GROUP
10. The Incident Command Post, Staging Area, Triage Area
and First Aid Station were established.
11. The Incident Commander established clear leadership
during the drill.
12. The First Aid/Medical Team immediately addressed all
medical needs of the injured victims..
13. The Search and Rescue Team was efficiently organized in
responding to the incident.
14. The Fire Safety/Brigade Team was organized to assess
the building for any presence of fire emergencies.
15. The Evacuation Team properly executed the evacuation
procedures.
16. The Site Security Team adequately secured the perimeter
for the drill areas.
17. The Maintenance Team observed protocols in ensuring the
building safety before re-entering.
18. The Communication utilized the equipment properly during
the coordination and execution of response operations.
19. The Transportation team ensured the availability of
ambulance vehicles.
20. Emergency Medical Services was activated to address the
needs of some casualties.
SUB-TOTAL
GRAND TOTAL/OVER ALL RATING
RATING SCALE:
90-100 points - OUTSTANDING 70-79 points - SATISFACTORY 59 & below - NEEDS IMPROVEMENT
80-89 points - VERY SATISFACTORY 60-69 - FAIR
PART II – RECOMMENDATIONS AND OTHER COMMENTS:
Attendance Slip
LESSON TO PONDER