200833 Assignment 3 Leadership

Development Plan
by

Submission date: 01-Sep-2018 11:08PM (UT C+1000)

Submission ID:
File name: 200833_Assignment_3_Leadership_Development_Plan_ver_Final.docx (648.39K)
Word count: 3599
Character count: 24227
200833 Assignment 3 Leadership Development Plan
GRADEMARK REPORT

FINAL GRADE GENERAL COMMENTS

Instructor

A voice comment was left for this paper.

/35

PAGE 2

PAGE 3

PAGE 4

QM Introduction | Int roduct ion

As previous with the addition of possible critical arguments of the topic.

PAGE 5

PAGE 6

QM Analysis and CT | Analysis & CT

<f ont color="#000000" f ace="T imes New Roman" size="3"> </f ont><p style="margin: 3pt 0cm;
line-height: 10pt; mso-line-height-rule: exactly;"><span lang="EN-US" style="letter-spacing:
0pt;"><f ont color="#000000" f ace="Gotham Narrow Book" size="2">Highly developed analytical
skills and critical thinking.</f ont></span></p><f ont color="#000000" f ace="T imes New Roman"
size="3"> </f ont>

PAGE 7

Comment 1
How excellent!

QM Analysis and CT
<f ont color="#000000" f ace="T imes New Roman" size="3"> </f ont><p style="margin: 3pt 0cm;
line-height: 10pt; mso-line-height-rule: exactly;"><span lang="EN-US" style="letter-spacing:
 0pt;"><f ont color="#000000" f ace="Gotham Narrow Book" size="2">Highly developed analytical
skills and critical thinking.</f ont></span></p><f ont color="#000000" f ace="T imes New Roman"
size="3"> </f ont>

PAGE 8

PAGE 9

PAGE 10

PAGE 11

PAGE 12

PAGE 13

PAGE 14

PAGE 15

PAGE 16

PAGE 17

PAGE 18

PAGE 19

PAGE 20

PAGE 21
RUBRIC: 20 0 8 33 LEADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT

INT RODUCT ION High

Distinction
Does the Introduction give an adequate outline of what f ollows?

FAIL Fails to address what f ollows.

PASS Some contextualisation but still leaves conf usion of what f ollows.

CREDIT A good description of what f ollows.

DISTINCTION As previous with the addition of the importance of (and reasons f or) undertaking
such a report.

HIGH DISTINCTION As previous with the addition of possible critical arguments of the topic.

ARGUMENT AT ION High

Distinction
Substantiation of arguments and overall quality of discussion

FAIL No discussion or argument.

PASS Poor use of argument, unconvincing explanations to substantiate points discussed.

CREDIT Reasonable use of argument to substantiate the points under discussion.

DISTINCTION Relevant and convincing use of arguments to substantiate the points under
discussion.

ANALYSIS & CT High

Distinction
Demonstrated analytical and independent critical thinking

FAIL Merely regurgitated inf ormation.

PASS Merely described the issue under examination.

CREDIT Some evidence of analytical skills, but a dominant tendency to describe.

DISTINCTION Relatively good analytical and critical thinking skills.

CULT URAL DIV High

Distinction
Evaluation of prof essional or enterprise practice in relation to culture and diversity. Recommendations,
including contingencies, alternatives and f uture implications

FAIL No evaluation of prof essional or enterprise practice in relation to culture and

diversity. No recommendations, including contingencies, alternatives and f uture
implications

PASS Basic evaluation of prof essional or enterprise practice in relation to culture and
diversity. Basic recommendations, including contingencies, alternatives and f uture
implications

CREDIT Good evaluation of prof essional or enterprise practice in relation to culture and
diversity. Good recommendations, including contingencies, alternatives and f uture
implications

DISTINCTION Comprehensive evaluation of prof essional or enterprise practice in relation to culture

and diversity. Comprehensive recommendations, including contingencies, alternatives
and f uture implications

RESEARCH High
Distinction
Level of research

FAIL Very little or no evidence of research in the work.

PASS Limited amount of valid research/ analysis of mandatory ref erences.

CREDIT Relatively good amount of valid research/ analysis of mandatory ref erences.

DISTINCTION Overall, good amount of valid research/ analysis of mandatory ref erences.

ARG & ST RUCT High

Distinction

FAIL Disjointed, poorly structured. Disconnected paragraphs.

PASS Argument poorly constructed with some coherence.

CREDIT Relatively coherent argument but still dif f icult to understand links in some sections.

DISTINCTION A coherent line of argument but not thoroughly sustained.

A sustained coherent and logical line of argument.

REFERENCING High
 Distinction
Identif ied and ref erenced sources accurately

FAIL Very little or no ref erencing; incorrect ref erencing.

PASS Not consistently ref erenced.

CREDIT Identif ied and ref erenced many of the sources used, but still some missing.

DISTINCTION Identif ied and ref erenced most of the sources used.

Identif ied and ref erenced accurately all sources used.

WRIT T EN WORD High

Distinction
Used sound spelling and grammar

FAIL Unintelligible expression; unacceptable number of spelling errors.

PASS Poor grammar; some spelling errors.

CREDIT Relatively good grammar and spelling, but occasional errors.

DISTINCTION Generally good grammar and spelling; very f ew errors.

Sound grammar and spelling.