MRF-AMY-2018-2019 - Mid-Year

Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education
Region IV-A CALABARZON
DIVISION OF CALAMBA CITY
BANLIC ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
MID-YEAR REVIEW FORM (MRF)

Name of Teacher: AMELITA M. PADUA Name of Rater: MARIA SHEILA H. SUMILANG
Position: Master Teacher I Position: Principal II
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: DEP ED - CALAMBA CITY Date of Review: October 31, 2019
Rating Period: June-October 2019
Mid-Year Review Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timelin Weight MOV Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Mid-Year
e per Target Review Results
Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
KRA
1. Classroom 3 Modeled 3 Modeled .225
observation tool (COT) effective effective
rating sheet Quality applications applications of
and/or inter-observer of content content
agreement form about knowledge knowledge
knowledge of content within and within and
1. Modeled
within and across across across
1. Content effective June 7.5% curriculum teaching curriculum curriculum
and applications of to areas teaching teaching areas
Pedagogy content March 2. Lesson areas as as shown in
Basic knowledge within 2019 plans/modified DLLs shown in MOV 1 with a
Education and across
developed MOV 1 with rating of 6
Services curriculum
highlighting arating of 6
teaching areas.
integration of content 3 Submitted 3 Submitted
(7.5%)
knowledge 2lessons as 2lessons as
within and across Efficiency evidenced evidenced by
subject areas by MOV 1 MOV 1 from
3. Instructional from colleagues and
materials highlighting colleagues supported by
mastery of and any 1 of the
content and its supported other MOV
integration in other by any 1 of given
subject areas the other
4. Performance MOV given
tasks/test material(s) Submitted Submitted
highlighting MOV were MOV were
integration of content Distributed Distributed
knowledge within and Timeliness across 2 across 2
across subject area quarters quarters

MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weigh MOV Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Mid-Year Review
t Target Results
per
KRA
2. Collaborated 1. Copy of the research 4 Conducted 4 Conducted ..3
with colleagues in proposal focused on and and
the conduct and enriching knowledge Quality
of content and
completed completed
application of action action
pedagogy
research to enrich 2. Proof of participation research research
knowledge of and/or contribution to with with
content and June 7.5% a collaborative
to colleagues colleagues
pedagogy.(7.5%) research (e.g. e-mail, 4
March actual output Submitted 4 Submitted
Basic 2019 submitted, terms of any any
Education reference, etc.) Efficiency 3 of the 3 of the
Services 3. Certified completed acceptable acceptable
collaborative research MOV MOV
focused on enriching
knowledge of content
4 Completed 4 Completed
and pedagogy
4. Proof of dissemination the the
of research findings research research
with colleagues Timeliness
report report
5. Proof of utilization of
within the within the
research findings
rating rating
period period
*Please see attached list of MOV

MFOs KRAs Objectives Timelin Weight MOV Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Mid-Year Review
e per Target Results
KRA
1. Classroom observation tool 3 Demonstrated 3 Demonstrated .225
(COT) effective
effective
rating sheet and/or inter- teaching
observer Quality strategies to teaching
agreement form about using promote critical strategies to
effective teaching strategies to and creative promote
3. Developed promote critical and creative thinking, as
critical
and teaching, as well as other higher
order
well as other
higher-order and creative
applied June 7.5% thinking, as
thinking skills thinking skills
to
effective March
2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs
used in
as shown in
MOV 1 with a
well as other
teaching higher-order
2019 demonstration teaching rating of 6
Basic thinking skills
Education strategies to highlighting
different teaching strategies that as shown in
Services promote develop critical and creative MOV 1 with a
critical and thinking
and/or other HOTS
rating of 6
creative 3. Instructional materials 3 Submitted 2 3 Submitted 2
lessons as
thinking, as highlighting lessons as
evidently
different teaching strategies that evidently
well develop critical and creative
Efficiency shown in MOV
1 and shown in
as other thinking
supported by MOV
and/or other HOTS
higher-order 4. Performance tasks/test
any 1 of the
1 and
other MOV
thinking skills. material(s)
given supported by
used in demonstration teaching
5. Results of assessment used
any 1 of the
in the other MOV
demonstration teaching given
Timeliness


MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weigh MOV Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Mid-Year Review
t Target Results
per
KRA
4. Worked with 1.Classroom observation 4 Modeled and 4 Modeled and .3
colleagues to model tool (COT) rating sheet shared shared
and/or inter-observer effective effective
and share effective Quality
agreement form about classroom classroom
techniques in the sharing effective techniques management management
management of in the management of strategies strategies
classroom structure that that
classroom structure
1. Lesson plans/modified engage engage
Learning to engage learners, 7.5%
DLLs used in learners in learners in
Environment individually or in June to demonstration activities/ activities/
March
and groups, in teaching highlighting tasks tasks
Basic 2019 effective classroom done in done in
Diversity of meaningful management different different
Education
Services Learners exploration, strategies that engage physical physical
discovery and learners in learning learning
hands-on activities activities/tasks in environments environments
different physical as shown in as shown in
within a range of learning environments MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a
physical learning 2. Minutes of LAC rating of 7 rating of 7
environments.(7.5%) highlighting the 4 Submitted 3 4 Submitted 3
sharing on effective lessons lessons
classroom supported by supported by
Efficiency
management MOV 1 and MOV 1 and
techniques any 1 of the any 1 of the
3. Instructional other other
materials used in acceptable acceptable
demonstration MOV MOV
teaching
Timeliness

SUGGESTED MID-YEAR REVIEW FORM (MRF)

MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight MOV Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Mid-Year Review
per Target Results
KRA
5. Exhibited 1.Classroom observation 3 Exhibited 3 Exhibited .225
tool (COT) rating effective and effective and
effective sheet and/or inter-observer constructive
Quality constructive
and agreement behavior behavior
constructive form about effective teacher management
management
management of learner skills by
behavior behavior using applying skills by
management June 7.5% the following strategies: positive and applying
skills by 1. Providing motivation non-violent positive and
to 2. Praising the discipline to non-violent
applying March learners/Giving positive ensure discipline to
Basic positive and 2019 feedback learning ensure
Education non-violent 3. Setting house focused learning
Services rules/guidelines environments
discipline to 4. Ensuring learners’ active shown in
focused
ensure participation MOV
environments
shown in
learning- 5. Allowing learners to 1 with a
MOV
express their rating
focused ideas/opinions of 6 1 with a
environments.. 6. Giving equal rating
opportunities to of 6
learners 3 Applied at 3 Applied at
7. Encouraging learners to least 7 of the least 7 of the
ask given
Efficiency given
questions strategies as strategies as
observed in 2
lessons
observed in 2
lessons
Timeliness


per Target Results
KRA
6. Worked with 1. Minutes of LAC session/s, 3 Worked 3 Worked .225
colleagues to highlighting one’s sharing of with with
share strategies on differentiated Quality colleagues colleagues
differentiated, and in in
developmentally developmentally-appropriate the the
appropriate opportunities to address department department
opportunities to learners’ or or
June 7.5%
address to differences grade level grade level
learners’ March 2. Lesson plans/modified to to
differences in 2019 DLLs share share
Basic gender, needs, highlighting strategies on lesson lesson
Education
Services strengths, interests differentiated and Submitted Submitted
and developmentallyappropriate at at
experiences opportunities to address Efficiency least 1 least 1
learners’ differences lesson lesson
3. Corresponding as evidently as
instructional shown in evidently
materials showing MOV shown in
differentiated and 1 and MOV
developmentally appropriate supported 1 and
by supported
any by
acceptable any
MOV acceptable
MOV
Timeliness


KRA
1. Classroom 3 Developed 3 Developed .225
observation tool and and
7. Developed (COT) Quality
rating sheet and/or
applied applied
and inter-observer effective effective
applied effective agreement form strategies strategies
strategies in the about using effective showing showing
Curriculum planning and June strategies in
to developmental developmental
and management of implementing
ly- sequenced ly- sequenced
March 7.5% developmentally
Planning developmentally 2019 teaching and teaching and
Basic sequenced teaching
Education sequenced and learning process learning learning
Services teaching and 2. Results of process as process as
learning learners’ assessment shown in MOV shown in MOV
processes to during the actual
teaching
1 with a rating 1 with a rating
meet curriculum 3. Lesson of 6 of 6
requirements plans/modified DLLs 3 Submitted 1 3 Submitted 1
and varied used in lesson as lesson as
teaching demonstration Efficiency evidenced by evidenced by
contexts. teaching highlighting
developmentally
shown in MOV shown in MOV
sequenced 1 and/or 2 and 1 and/or 2 and
teaching-learning supported by supported by
process any 1 of the any 1 of the
4. Instructional other other
materials showing
effective strategies in
developmentally
sequenced teaching Timeliness
and learning process
5. Performance
tasks/test material(s)
used in
demonstration
teaching


MFOs KRAs Objectives Timelin Weight MOV Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Mid-Year Review
e per Target Results
KRA
8. Reviewed 1. Implemented LAC/FGD 3 Occasionally 3 Occasionally .225
Plan led led
with 2. Minutes of LAC/FGD collaborative collaborative
Quality
colleagues, sessions on reviews of reviews of
teacher and use of teacher and learner teacher and teacher and
feedback learner learner
learner to enrich teaching practice feedback as feedback as
feedback to June 7.5% with proof evidenced by evidenced
plan, to
of attendance the MOV by
submitted the MOV
facilitate and March submitted
Basic enrich 2019 3 Submitted 2 3 Submitted 2
Education teaching collaborative collaborative
Services reviews of reviews of
practice. Efficiency
teacher and teacher and
learner learner
feedback as feedback as
evidently evidently
shown in shown in
MOV MOV
1 and 1 and
supported by supported
any 1 of the by
acceptable any 1 of the
MOV acceptable
MOV
Timeliness


KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight MOV Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Mid-Year Review
MFOs per Target Results
KRA
9. Advised 1. Teaching and 3 Occasionally 3 Occasionally .225
and guided learning resources reviewed reviewed
colleagues in developed by Quality collaboratively collaboratively
the colleagues and assessment assessment
selection, critiqued on their tools with tools with
organization, June 7.5%
alignment to colleagues as colleagues as
development to learning goals shown in the shown in the
and use of March 2. Lesson plans by MOV MOV
Basic appropriate 2019 colleagues critiqued submitted submitted
Education teaching in terms of the Submitted 2 Submitted 2
Services and learning alignment of the teaching and teaching and
resources, teaching and Efficiency learning learning
including ICT, learning resources to resources as resources as
to the indicated evidenced by evidenced by
address learning goals and at least 1 of at least 1 of
specific appropriateness to the the
learning the target acceptable acceptable
goals.. MOV MOV
Timeliness


KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight MOV Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Mid-Year Review
MFOs per Target Results
KRA
Any proof of 3 Occasionally 3 Occasionally .225
collaborative review reviewed reviewed
if Quality collaboratively collaboratively
the test is designed assessment assessment
10. Worked based on its tools with tools with
collaboratively purpose (e.g. colleagues as colleagues as
with June 7.5%
to diagnostic, shown in the shown in the
colleagues to March formative MOV MOV
review the 2019 and summative) submitted submitted
Basic
Education design, 3 Submitted 2 3 Submitted 2
Services selection, assessment assessment
organization Efficiency tools as tools as
and use of evidently evidently
a range of shown in any shown in any
effective of the of the
diagnostic, acceptable acceptable
formative MOV MOV
and
summative
assessment
Timeliness
strategies
consistent with
curriculum
requirements.


per Target Results
KRA
1. Collaborative 3 Occasionally 3 Occasionally .225
interpretation of the collaborated collaborated
11. Interpreted index of mastery Quality with with
collaboratively obtained from 1 colleagues colleagues in
monitoring and class in the
evaluation 2. Collaborative the interpretation
June 7.5%
strategies of to interpretation of item interpretation of
attainment March analysis of quarterly of assessment
Basic data to 2019 examinations assessment data as
Education support 3. Collaborative data as shown
Services learner interpretation of shown in the MOV
progress results in the MOV submitted
and of performance submitted
achievement. assessment 3 Submitted at 3 Submitted at
least 2 of the least 2 of the
Efficiency same kind of same kind of
MOV MOV
Timeliness


KRA
1. Sample agreement for 3 Occasionally 3 Occasionally .225
learners at
risk signed by parents and applied skills in applied skills in
corresponding evidence of Quality the effective the effective
improvement
12. Applied skills 2. Record of dialogue and/or communication communication
in the effective parentteacher of learner of learner
conferences and
communication corresponding evidence of needs and needs and
June 7.5%
of learner needs, improvement progress to progress to
to 3. Anecdotal record
progress and March communicated to parents/ parents/
Basic
achievement to 2019 and signed by the learners guardians as guardians as
and/or
Education key stakeholders, parents with corresponding shown in the shown in the
Services including evidence MOV MOV
of improvement
parents/guardians. submitted submitted
4. Sample of learners’ test 3 Submitted any 3 Submitted any
results
signed by parents and 2 MOV 2 MOV
corresponding evidence of Efficiency
improvement
5. Sample of accomplished
rubrics
given for performance task
and
corresponding evidence of
improvement
6. Attendance sheet/minutes
of parent-teacher
conference Timeliness
7. Signed report cards of
students at
risk with corresponding
evidence of
improvement
8. Correspondence
notebook/letters/proof of
communication using other
modalities (e.g. e-mail,
SMS, etc.)
and corresponding evidence
of improvement
9. Learners’ performance
record
*Please see attached list of MO


KRAs Objectives Timelin Weight MOV Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Mid-Year Review
MFOs e per Target Results
Rating Remarks Rating Remark
KRA
s
1. Served as reliever of classes in the 5 Consistently 5 Consistently .50
absence of teachers performed performed
2. Served as OIC in the absence of the special tasks special tasks
principal Quality and/or and/or
3. Represented the principal in assignments as assignments
meetings and conferences shown in the as
4. Observed classes of Teachers I-III MOV submitted shown in the
13. Performed 5. Assisted the school selection MOV
various committee in the evaluation of
credentials when hiring or promoting 5 Submitted at 5
submitted
Submitted at
Plus related June 10% teachers least 4 different least 4
to 6. Certificate of Recognition or kinds of different
Factor works/activities Participation Efficiency acceptable kinds of
March 7. Certificate of Training MOV acceptable
that contribute 2019 8. Certificate of Speakership MOV
Basic
Education to the teaching- 9. Committee involvement
10. Advisorship of Co-curricular
Services learning activities
11. Book or Journal Authorship/Coauthorship/
process.. Contributorship
12.Coordinatorship/chairmanship
Timeliness
13. Coaching and mentoring learners in

competitions
14. Mentoring pre-service/in-service
1. teachers
MARIA SHEILA H. SUMILANG AMELITA M. PADUA

Rater Ratee Approving Authority
AJA18-0155

MRF-AMY-2018-2019 - Mid-Year

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

MRF-AMY-2018-2019 - Mid-Year

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Republic of the Philippines

MID-YEAR REVIEW FORM (MRF)

MID-YEAR REVIEW FORM (MRF)

MID-YEAR REVIEW FORM (MRF)

*Please see attached list of MOV

MID-YEAR REVIEW FORM (MRF)

*Please see attached list of MOV

SUGGESTED MID-YEAR REVIEW FORM (MRF)

*Please see attached list of MOV

Republic of the Philippines

MID-YEAR REVIEW FORM (MRF)

*Please see attached list of MOV

Republic of the Philippines

MID-YEAR REVIEW FORM (MRF)

Republic of the Philippines

MID-YEAR REVIEW FORM (MRF)

*Please see attached list of MOV

Republic of the Philippines

MID-YEAR REVIEW FORM (MRF)

*Please see attached list of MOV

Republic of the Philippines

MID-YEAR REVIEW FORM (MRF)

Republic of the Philippines

MID-YEAR REVIEW FORM (MRF)

*Please see attached list of MOV

Republic of the Philippines

MID-YEAR REVIEW FORM (MRF)

Republic of the Philippines

MID-YEAR REVIEW FORM (MRF)

13. Coaching and mentoring learners in

*Please see attached list of MOV

MARIA SHEILA H. SUMILANG AMELITA M. PADUA

You might also like