PERINATAL-

DEPRESSION
Background/Rationale:

Both childbirth and the postpartum period may be happy and exciting but then also stressful
and challenging periods. Moms and dads must contend with a number of new obstacles at this
time since birth and pregnancy bring about numerous behavioral and physiological alterations.
Therefore, there is a higher threat of developing a mental disorder or experiencing a relapse
during childbirth and after giving birth (Smith, 2011). In accordance with Alipour (2012), anxiety
and depression are the two mental diseases that are most prevalent throughout postpartum
and during pregnancy. But why certain females are more "prone" to experiencing depression or
anxiety symptoms than others notwithstanding adversity, is still a mystery to researchers.

The prevalence estimates of maternal anxiety and depression differ between studies. Regardless
of the fact that fewer studies have been done in middle- and low GDP country, rates of
21 percent or higher have been seen in these locations, thus according to Melville (2010).
Incidence estimates for depression in elevated nations vary from seven to twenty percent
(Husain, 2012, 2011). Prenatal depression affects 12 percent of females in the first gestation and
8 percent of females overall in the third and fourth trimesters, according to studies by Gavin et
al (Gavin, 2005). With an incidence of 7 percent during the first gestation, 12 percent in the
next, and Twelve percentage in the third, Bennett found the opposite trend (Bennett, 2004). 

Estimates indicate that postnatal sadness affects between 6percentage points to 29 percentage
points of females in low - income, middle class, and elevated countries (Saturday, 2007; Beck,
2001; Parsons, 2012). In reality, a latest analysis showed that the likelihood of a depressive
episodes was higher in 24 of 30 economies with lesser intermediate sizes than in those with
strong economies. The highest rates were found in Zimbabwe (32 percentage) Vietnam (34
percentage), Guyana (49 percentage), while the lowest rates were found inside Uganda (5.1
percentage) and Nepal (5.6 percentage) (Parsons 2012). Postpartum rates in developing
countries increase after childbirth and reach a high inside the 3rd postpartum period (13.9%),
before declining to 11.6 percent at monthly 6.5 and 7.5 percent overall after month 8.5. (Gavin
and others, 2015). Frequency of these kinds of sickness seem to be higher while symptoms
instead of actual illnesses are investigated, when anxiety and depression or stress are assessed
using just a self-report ratings system instead of an interview session, or when functional
requirements aren’t being utilized for the diagnosis (Bennett, 2004). Postpartum months have
traditionally drawn much more attention from the scientific community than the prenatal
period, despite some studies suggesting a decrease in anxiety & depression following pregnancy
instead of an elevation (Heron, 2004). Latest research (Norhayati, 2015) found the antenatal
anxiousness & depressed mood, a history of mental disorders, a poor relationship, life traumas
events, a negative view of pregnancies of females, and an insufficient social help are all serious
threat considerations for postnatal anxiety in both developing and developed countries. The
current focus of the systematic review will be the possible causes for prenatal anxiety and
depression. Prenatal difficulties with mental health have received far less attention than
postpartum problems for a number of reasons. For example, it's a prevalent misconception that
pregnancy "hormonally shields" females with psychological anguish (Bennett, 2004). Females
could also be hesitant to express emotions of despair & anger due to the prejudice linked with
melancholy in addition to the y problems among female's aspirations of joy during labor (as well
as the postpartum period) & one ‘s actual interactions (Marcus, 2009). Furthermore, there is a
tendency to ignore mental health during pregnancy in favor of physical health (of the mother
and the fetus) and to wrongly associate emotional issues with physiological & hormones
alterations that take place during birthing (Bowen, 2016). In reality, these females typically
found with unusual depression signs and nebulous somatic ailments rather than a depressed
mood (Zimmerman, 2011). Tiredness, an energy loss, fluctuations in hunger, & irregular sleeping
habits are a few examples of these symptoms. This makes it difficult to distinguish between
"typical" symptoms of pregnancy, which seem to persist throughout childbirth, and odd somatic
symptoms, which may be related to anxiety or depression (Marchesi, 2009). It is harder to
recognize depressions & anxiousness without a formal evaluation (Andersson, 2006). Postnatal
Depressions Edinburgh Scale (EPDS), a most accurate & excessively applied self-report assessing
instrument for sadness throughout the postpartum, does not contain somatic issues, tiredness,
and appetite changes since they do not aid to differentiate among depressing from quasi
females (Cox, 2013). As a result, clinical signs throughout the postpartum period may lead to a
diagnostic error of sadness. However, it's also been noted that disregarding severe symptoms
may have an impact on how severely the problem is treated (Yonkers, 2009). In fact, most
females with higher EPDS scores also display greater severe problems (Zelkowitz, 2004).
Because of this, it's possible that patients and medical professionals would wrongly attribute
physical effects to a depressive disorder rather than to the regular pattern of childbirth in
subsequent postpartum period (Klein and Essex, 1994). It could be difficult to detect prenatal
anxiety in females who had only one prenatal visit. In reality, differences in the levels. In fact,
different examinations may show variances in the degrees of anxiety and despair during labour.
Some research results (Yanikkerem , 2016) have discovered that depressed mood moods
happen more oftenly throughout the 1st and 3rd gestation of childbirth, particularly in
comparison to the 2nd pregnancy, which may be due to the fact that the most vulnerable
females appear to be even more probable to encounter stress as they are attempting to manage
the historic chance of having moms & as they start preparing of delivery of a baby and begin a
life (Marchesi , 2009). Multiple tests may be required if many pregnant females have anxiety or
depressive episodes at one or more phases of their pregnancy. Maternal depression is among
the health conditions that's also least known and treated as a result of these variables (Marcus.
2019). The deficiency of awareness has significant repercussions since it’s also now a days
accepted that postpartum anxiety, stress, depressions throughout childbirth have substantial
longer effects on both the mothers & the infant (Glover, 2015). Even though the underpinning
molecular mechanism isn’t understood comprehensively, it has been proposed that a decrease
inside fetus’s bloodstream and/or an increase in its exposed to cortisol might some of the likely
moderating variables. Cortisol levels which are elevated in the mom and have been linked with
sadness, anxiety, & stress might pass through the placenta, enter the baby, and impact how the
kid grows (Glover. 2017). Additionally, mothers who experience prenatal anxiety & depression
are substantially extra likely to delay seeking treatments, participate in antenatal visits less
frequently, and forego regular scans (Marcus, 2009). All of these elements have been linked to
poorly availability of food, excessive weight, heavy consumption of alcohol, smoking & drug
abuse, while pregnant (Kim, 2006;). According to several studies, some females opt an optional
caesarean section and regularly see the physician because they fear giving birth (Rubertsson,
2014).
Additionally, there is evidence that links between anxiety and depression and severe congenital
defects, low birth weight, stillbirth, preterm delivery, inadequate Apgar scores, decreased head
size, and stillbirth (Raisanen, 2014). A lesser Brazelton Neonatal Based on Behavior Assessment
Ratings system, a significantly more difficult personality, a higher threat of emotional issues
(especially depressive disorders), cognitive impairments growth, and early indications of
conduct issues and attention deficit hyperactive disorder are all additional signs of altered
foundational pathways (Glover, 2014; Previti, 2014). The children’s are more prone to encounter
negative life experiences, hyperactivity, and cognitive deficits between the ages of thirteen and
Sixteen (Van den Bergh., 2015), as well as depression in both childhood and adolescent (Plant,
2015).

In contrasts to prenatal depressions, which are the strongest predictor of both, postpartum
depressions are the best indicator of parental difficulties & stress in the mother-child
connection (Milgrom, 2008). The importance of focusing on the prenatal stage for developing
preventative and therapeutic strategies is shown by the combination of these several lines of
research. Every woman in the prenatal period should have a routine psychological and social
assessment. A through assessment of a woman's psychological environments is what we mean
by "psychosocial assessment" (forms of supportiveness, the relationships quality of women,
current pressures in life, and any history of or current physical and sexual abuse). In fact, this
evaluation might help doctors find females who have a high level of threat profile but aren't yet
displaying symptoms. In actuality, this assessment would help healthcare professionals spot
females who possess a large presence but aren't yet displaying symptoms, allowing them to
provide preventative treatments (Austin, 2014). Unfortunately, because this assessment is not
routinely performed, the majority of females are not aware that they are at threat for or really
do have prenatal depression & anxiety (Andersson, 2013). Nevertheless, because both father &
mothers are typically very encouraged to get treatment for the children's welfare and also the
strong factor while reducing the inter-generational family issues, the perinatal timeframe gives
very uniquely a chance to establish a preventative program for the psychological wellbeing of
entire households (Austin’s, 2014).

AIM:
To assess the perinatal depression in pregnant women.

Objective:
Goal of the research is to do a thorough examination of the available researched
information on controlled studies accessing depression in pregnant women who have
been deemed to be at-risk due to their economic situation, time of life, history of
pregnancy, physical disorders, or anxiety in their personal lives. Particular studies have
shown that some subpopulations react better to therapies, regardless of the fact that
the risk factors for perinatal depression are strongly associated. The purpose of this
paper is to ascertain how pregnant women face perinatal depression and what are
impacts it have on the newborns and the mother.

Methodology.

A latest comprehensive study on this topic sought to discover threat variables for prenatal
depressions which might be examined throughout the obstetrics care (Lancaster 2010). Actually,
since mostly pregnant females seek obstetrics care, which makes it very likely to spot females
who are vulnerable, treat them, and then keep in touch with them (Lancaster, 2010). According
to this analysis of 54 research studies from the New Zealand, United States, Australia, Europe,
and Canada that were published between December 1979 and Feb 2009, maternal anxiety,
stress, a past of depression, a lack of support, domestic violence, and unintended pregnancies
are the main threat factors for experiencing depressive episodes symptoms throughout
pregnancy. Our comprehensive investigation aims to explain the important psycho-social,
obstetrician, and environment issue variables implicated in the formation of pregnant stress and
despair with a wider variety of low-earnings, moderate-earnings, and rising income countries
than (Lancaster 2015).   A thorough research was done analysis to identify the main
environmental and psychological contamination variables linked to the emergence of pregnant
stress & depression.

Search strategy:
The sources for medical and psychological studies (Psych INFO, PubMed, and the Cochrane
Library) were used to discover pertinent articles and reviews using the key words listed below,
either separately or maybe together. Prenatal depressions threatening variables, gestational
stress threat factors, mental health issues for pregnant females, maternal anxiety disorders,
prenatal anxiety threat factors, screenings, evaluations, and assessments.

Inclusion criteria:

When relevant studies were cited in the chosen publications' references, attention was also
given to including them in the review. A real article was deemed to be original if it was
documented in the English language and then afterwards published in between January 15th,
2010, and Aug 31, 2022. In addition, the appropriate grey literature sources were consulted,
including advice from NICE, research from linked charities (such as Tommy) & scientific
organization (such as the Marci Societies), as well as data from pertinent websites (Austin,
2014;). 13 reviews of literature and on prenatal disorder and pertinent threat factors were
examined, regardless of when they were published (Siegel and Brandon, 2014). After removing
duplicates and research that weren't linked and cross-referencing the different sources, 96
publications were selected.

Exclusion criteria:

Studies that were conducted on specific and large populations were not conducted on females
who had been revealed to serious significant environmental catastrophes such as seismic
activity or tsunamis, females with pre-existing medical problems like sexually transmitted
diseases or obesity, females with issues pertaining to pregnancy such as hyperglycemia, females
with elevated level of threat pregnancies, or females who had babies with congenital
abnormalities. Additionally, we did not include threat factors related to physical health.
However, research delving into threat variables for persistent and repeated episodes of
depression during labor have been allowed. Studies showing health threat s for retention of
anxiety and sadness during childbirth in postnatal time period has been disallowed. Research
was also disregarded if, the threat s investigated, the evaluation period, and data analysis also
weren't explicitly outlined. Additionally, studies were disregarded if they had looked at threat
variables for anxiety & sadness in postpartum (maybe during childbirth or after delivery) & it is
impossible to determine whether those threat variables were unmistakably linked to the
antenatal time.In addition to this analysis contains data from an 50 articles on the perinatal
anxiety & depressions and the psychological mechanisms at work, the implications for child
behavior, and prevention measures, either in the preface or the conclusions. Both the databases
that were examined and the references of the research included in the study contained
references to these publications.

Quality Assessment:

Relevant publications will be evaluated for study quality in order to spot studies that are
untrustworthy and give deceptive results as a result of low quality. This process will also be used
to determine which articles will be included and excluded in the future. The Critical Appraisal
Skills Program (CASP) Qualitative Checklist (CASP, 2018) will be used to assess the quality of
primary research; however, no extraction and inclusion will be used because there is no
accurate scoring system. CASP is adjusted yearly by a team of experts, and it has been widely
researched and used for a long time (CASP, 2018). The CASP qualitative checklist is easy to use,
suitable for novices, and time-effective because it only has 10 questions. The advice in each
question is also much shorter than those in the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) (2018) checklist,
making it easier to analyze. The underlying methodological quality of primary research is not
rigorously evaluated by the CASP instrument, in contrast to JBI, and this may have an impact on
evaluations of the findings' validity. Nevertheless, JBI won't be used because the generalizability
validity isn't evaluated in its checklist (Hannes, 2010), even though it's an important factor to
consider when thinking about the extension of study results. Each question will be evaluated for
each article and given a "Yes," "no," or "can't tell" response. Thirteen findings from these
assessments will be divided into three groups: A, B, and C. Studies will be classified as being at
level A if they satisfy all the criteria, level B if they satisfy part of the criteria in sections B and C,
and level C if they satisfy none of the criteria. The C level will be assigned to those who choose
"No" in response to the section A question. The data from levels A, B, and C will be considered
in the data synthesis, and their quality will be compared. Since even subpar articles might
provide valuable information, the level evaluation won't be used to decide whether a paper
should be kept or removed after review (Cherry, 2017). The reviewer needs to be watchful to
make sure the checklist is applied consistently (Greenhalgh and Brown, 2017). Any issues that
could come up will be discussed with the supervisor.
Data synthesis:
This process will be carried out by the reviewer under the supervisor's supervision. Since it is
advantageous to synthesize significant elements from a huge quantity of qualitative data with
the aim of creating new results, thematic analysis is utilized in this research to conduct meta-
synthesis in order to uncover themes among qualitative studies (Braun and Clarke, 2006). Using
Thomas' (2008) three-stage technique, which entails coding the text "line-by-line," developing
"descriptive themes," and developing "analytical themes," would make this process clearer. The
main studies will be reexamined in the initial stage to reevaluate the code in its original context
and do free line-by-line coding. The correctness of the concept translation between articles and
the sufficiency of the coding will be assessed then for the analysis in the subsequent step, the
coding will be retrieved into NVivo 11. In the second stage, related and related codes will be
rearranged and classified into descriptive themes. The reviewer will then go over the descriptive
themes again in an effort to identify sublimated topics that more accurately reflect the results of
primary research. 15 A meta-summary would be created if the papers that have been gathered
demonstrate a substantial level of heterogeneity.

Limitations:

It is important to note a few restrictions on this evaluation. We did not perform a meta-analysis
of the results, which would have revealed more details regarding the unique effects of each
threat factor. Nevertheless, other studies have independently reproduced the majority of the
threat variables included in this analysis. Additionally, this study does not particularly look at
variables that may affect the intensity of depressive or anxious episodes or the beginning of
various anxiety and depression. Additionally, it hasn't been feasible to evaluate the combined
impacts of several variables; however, this restriction is mostly because to the dearth of
research that address these issues. Additionally, studies involving females with already existing
medical complexities, like as obesity and Human immunodeficiency studies involving females
in  elevated level of threat  communities, such as those involving females subjected to natural
disasters such as quake or tidal waves, examine different females in high-threat pregnancies,
such as those involving diabetes, and studies involving females in high-threat communities have
all been excluded from this systematic review. The same holds true for research that involved
mothers of children with congenital abnormalities. This limits the applications to the population
and have led to research in the huge population revealing various threat factors. This review's
main objectives were to analyze the psychological and perinatal factors that contribute to the
development of antepartum anxiety and depressions in common, physically, and mentally
healthy populations. Healthy populations of females were also excluded from research that
examined possible threat variables connected to physical health. Finally, several fascinating
research might not have been considered since papers that were not published in English were
eliminated.

Conclusion:

Among conclusion, anxiety and mood issues are more prevalent in pregnant females. While
some females may have the very 1st depressives episodes when pregnant, other cope with the
threat of doing so because of the previous experiences of anxiety & depression (Raisanen,
2014). Numerous research on the main threat factors for the development of prenatal anxiety
and depression have shown a complex, multifactorial etiology (Lancaster, 2010). Numerous
threat variables connected to obstetrics, pregnancy, and the environment have been found in
this study. If we could accurately identify the females who are at threat of having these
conditions, we would be able to target the females who will be advantage from supportive and
preventative intervention. Determining the at-threat females will also be permitted to keep
track of them throughout their pregnancies, spot any early indications of sorrow or anxiety, and,
if required, provide therapeutic interventions. The majority of the high-profile research findings
have shown reassuring effectiveness and safety for antidepressants in childbirth (Parientes.
2015) & has also recognized effectively not-pharmacological forms of treatment (Bowen, 2014)
during pregnancy. However, still research is required to determine the efficacy of non-
pharmacologicals intervention.

References:

Abuidhail, J., Abujilban, S., 2014. Characteristics of Jordanian depressed pregnant women: a
comparison study. J. Psychiatr. Ment. Health Nurs. 21, 573–579.

Abujilban, S.K., Abuidhail, J., Al-Modallal, H., Hamaideh, S., Mosemli, O., 2014. Predictors of
antenatal depression among Jordanian pregnant women in their third trimester. Health Care
Women Int. 35, 200–215.

Lancaster, C.A., Gold, K.J., Flynn, H.A., Yoo, H., Marcus, S.M., Davis, M.M., 2010. Threat factors
for depressive symptoms during pregnancy: a systematic review. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 202, 5–
14.

Howard, L.M., Oram, S., Galley, H., Trevillion, K., Feder, G., 2013. Domestic violence and
perinatal mental disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Med. 10, e1001452.

Josefsson, A., Angelsioo, L., Berg, G., Ekstrom, C.M., Gunnervik, C., Nordin, C., Sydsjo, G., 2002.
Obstetric, somatic, and demographic threat factors for postpartum depressive symptoms.
Obstet. Gynecol. 99, 223–228.

Adewuya, A.O., Ola, B.A., Aloba, O.O., Dada, A.O., Fasoto, O.O., 2007. Prevalence and correlates
of depression in late pregnancy among Nigerian women. Depress. Anxiety 24, 15–21.

Agostini, F., Neri, E., Salvatori, P., Dellabartola, S., Bozicevic, L., Monti, F., 2015. Antenatal
depressive symptoms associated with specific life events and sources of social support among
Italian women. Matern. Child Health J. 19, 1131–1141.

Tommy's, 2013. Perinatal mental health report. Experiences of Women and Health
Professionals. Tommy’s, Netmums, Institute of Health Visiting, Royal College of Midwives, Boots
Family Trust.
Ajinkya, S., Jadhav, P.R., Srivastava, N.N., 2013. Depression during pregnancy: Prevalence and
obstetric threat factors among pregnant women attending a tertiary care hospital in Navi
Mumbai. Ind. Psychiatry J. 22, 37–40.

Akcal, X.A.P., Ayd, X.N.N., Yaz, X.C.X.E., Aksoy, A.N., Kirkan, T.S., Daloglu, G.A., 2014. Prevalence
of depressive disorders and related factors in women in the first trimester of their pregnancies
in Erzurum, Turkey. Int. J. Soc. Psychiatry.

Ali, N.S., Azam, I.S., Ali, B.S., Tabbusum, G., Moin, S.S., 2012. Frequency and associated factors
for anxiety and depression in pregnant women: a hospital-based cross-sectional study. Sci.
World J. 2012, 653098.

Raphael-Leff, J., 2010. Mothers’ and fathers’ orientations: patterns of pregnancy, parenting and
the bonding process. Parenthood and Mental Health. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Verreault, N., Da Costa, D., Marchand, A., Ireland, K., Dritsa, M., Khalife, S., 2014. Rates and
threat factors associated with depressive symptoms during pregnancy and with postpartum
onset. J. Psychosom. Obstet. Gynaecol. 35, 84–91.

Waqas, A., Raza, N., Lodhi, H.W., Muhammad, Z., Jamal, M., Rehman, A., 2015. Psychosocial
factors of antenatal anxiety and depression in pakistan: is social support a mediator? PLoS One
10, e0116510.

Alipour, Z., Lamyian, M., Hajizadeh, E., 2012. Anxiety and fear of childbirth as predictors of
postnatal depression in nulliparous women. Women Birth 25, e37–e43.

Ammaniti, M., Trentini, C., 2009. How new knowledge about parenting reveals the
neurobiological implications of intersubjectivity: a conceptual synthesis of recent research.
HPSD 19, 537–555.

Robertson-Blackmore, E., Putnam, F.W., Rubinow, D.R., Matthieu, M., Hunn, J.E., Putnam, K.T.,
Moynihan, J.A., O'Connor, T.G., 2013. Antecedent trauma exposure and threat of depression in
the perinatal period. J. Clin. Psychiatry 74, e942–e948.
Andersson, L., Sundstrom-Poromaa, I., Bixo, M., Wulff, M., Bondestam, K., aStrom, M., 2003.
Point prevalence of psychiatric disorders during the second trimester of pregnancy: a
population-based study. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 189, 148–154.

Andersson, L., Sundstrom-Poromaa, I., Wulff, M., Astrom, M., Bixo, M., 2004

Balestrieri, M., Isola, M., Bisoffi, G., Calo, S., Conforti, A., Driul, L., Marchesoni, D., Petrosemolo,
P., Rossi, M., Zito, A., Zorzenone, S., Di Sciascio, G., Leone, R., Bellantuono, C., 2012.
Determinants of ante-partum depression: a multicenter study. Soc. Psychiatry Psychiatr.
Epidemiol. 47, 1959–1965.

Baumeister, D., Russell, A., Pariante, C.M., Mondelli, V., 2014. Inflammatory biomarker profiles
of mental disorders and their relation to clinical, social and lifestyle factors. Soc. Psychiatry
Psychiatr. Epidemiol. 49, 841–849.

Bayrampour, H., McDonald, S., Tough, S., 2015. Threat factors of transient and persistent anxiety
during pregnancy. Midwifery 31, 582–589. Beck, C.T., 2001. Predictors of postpartum
depression: an update. Nurs. Res. 50, 275–285.

Milgrom, J., Gemmill, A.W., 2014. Screening for perinatal depression. Best Pract. Res. Clin.
Obstet. Gynaecol. 28, 13–23.

Bennett, H.A., Einarson, A., Taddio, A., Koren, G., Einarson, T.R., 2004. Prevalence of depression
during pregnancy: systematic review. Obstet. Gynecol. 103, 698–709.

Bergner, A., Beyer, R., Klapp, B.F., Rauchfuss, M., 2008. Pregnancy after early pregnancy loss: a
prospective study of anxiety, depressive symptomatology and coping. J. Psychosom. Obstet.
Gynaecol. 29, 105–113.

Smith, M.V., Shao, L., Howell, H., Lin, H., Yonkers, K.A., 2011. Perinatal depression and birth
outcomes in a Healthy Start project. Matern. Child Health J. 15, 401–409.
Bicking Kinsey, C., Baptiste-Roberts, K., Zhu, J., Kjerulff, K.H., 2015. Effect of previous miscarriage
on depressive symptoms during subsequent pregnancy and postpartum in the first baby study.
Matern. Child Health J. 19, 391–400.

Bilszta, J.L., Tang, M., Meyer, D., Milgrom, J., Ericksen, J., Buist, A.E., 2008. Single motherhood
versus poor partner relationship: outcomes for antenatal mental health. Aust. N. Z. J. Psychiatry
42, 56–65.

Bodecs, T., Szilagyi, E., Cholnoky, P., Sandor, J., Gonda, X., Rihmer, Z., Horvath, B., 2013.
Prevalence and psychosocial background of anxiety and depression emerging during the first
trimester of pregnancy: data from a Hungarian population-based sample. Psychiatr. Danub. 25,
352–358.

Bottomley, K.L., Lancaster, S.J., 2008. The association between depressive symptoms and
smoking in pregnant adolescents. Psychol. Health Med. 13, 574–582.

Bowen, A., Baetz, M., Schwartz, L., Balbuena, L., Muhajarine, N., 2014. Antenatal group therapy
improves worry and depression symptoms. Isr. J. Psychiatry Relat. Sci. 51, 226–231.

Bowen, A., Muhajarine, N., 2006a. Antenatal depression. Can. Nurse 102, 26–30.

Murray, D., Cox, J.L., 1990. Screening for depression during pregnancy with the edinburgh
depression scale (EDDS). J. Reprod. Infant Psychol. 8, 99–107.

Yanikkerem, E., Ay, S., Mutlu, S., Goker, A., 2013. Antenatal depression: prevalence and threat
factors in a hospital based Turkish sample. J. Pak. Med. Assoc. 63, 472–477.

Yonkers, K.A., Smith, M.V., Gotman, N., Belanger, K., 2009. Typical somatic symptoms of
pregnancy and their impact on a diagnosis of major depressive disorder. Gen. Hosp. Psychiatry
31, 327–333. Zayas, L.H., Jankowski, K.R.B., McKee, M.D., 2003. Prenatal and postpartum
depression among low-income dominican and Puerto Rican women. Hisp. J. Behav. Sci. 25, 370–
385.
Zelkowitz, P., Schinazi, J., Katofsky, L., Saucier, J.F., Valenzuela, M., Westreich, R., Dayan, J., 2004.
Factors associated with depression in pregnant immigrant women. Transcult. Psychiatry 41,
445–464.

Zeng, Y., Cui, Y., Li, J., 2015. Prevalence and predictors of antenatal depressive symptoms among
Chinese women in their third trimester: a cross-sectional survey. BMC Psychiatry 15, 66.
Redshaw, M., Henderson, J., 2013. From antenatal to postnatal depression: associated factors
and mitigating influences. J. Womens Health (Larchmt) 22, 518–525.