Professional Documents
Culture Documents
MBSE For Railgun Design - Part 5 - Intercax
MBSE For Railgun Design - Part 5 - Intercax
MBSE For Railgun Design - Part 5 - Intercax
com)
(https://twitter.com/intercax) (https://www.linkedin.com/company/intercax-llc)
(https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCc1Hb1fHO8_REoRJWb-UWEw)
(https://intercax.com/feed/)
Introduction
In this series we have sought to demonstrate how Model-Based Systems Engineering (MBSE) could
be applied to designing a railgun (Figure 1) which uses electromagnetic elds to accelerate and
launch a projectile at very high velocities. In previous sections, we have described the fundamental
physics, then applied the SysML (http://www.omgsysml.org/) modeling language and Intercax
SysML-compatible software tools to
In this nal section, we will execute the parametric analysis and examine an alternative approach
to system analysis, using a specialized simulation tool linked to the architecture model through the
Syndeia (https://intercax.com/products/syndeia/) MBSE platform.
An example of one solution set is shown in Figure 2 in the ParaMagic “object-oriented” browser. At
the top level, we have the three requirements verdicts, all of which are 0 (fail). Drilling down, we can
see why:
rechargeTime – 116.5 sec, which exceeds the 60 sec requirement
projectileEnergy = 2.7 MJ, which is below the 5 MJ threshold, and
exitVelocity = 2.3 km/sec, which is below the 3 km/sec threshold for a 1 kg projectile.
ParaMagic and Melody allow the system engineer to set up multi-variable trade studies to explore
the design space. In Table 1, we vary two inputs, Beam Length and AC Power, and examine the
e ect on the performance vs. requirements. The ParaMagic and Melody tools read the inputs from
the Excel spreadsheet and write back the results after solving. Beside each numerical result, there
is a second column containing a 1 or 0 for the requirement veri cation, also written by the
parametric solver, with Excel providing the red (fail) or white (pass) background using conditional
formatting. As can be seen easily, only the last row meets all three requirements.
The extrinsic approach assumes that the analysis model is created and executed in an external tool
such as Simulink (https://www.mathworks.com/products/simulink.html) or Modelica
(https://www.modelica.org/), but with the ability to ensure that the simulation model re ects
accurately the system architecture model. This requires not only traceability between the models,
or even the initial generation of the simulation model from the architecture model; it requires a
mechanism that allows comparison and updating of the two models as the project moves forward.
Figure 3 Simulink model of ControlPoint_3Way
The common work ow is that the Simulink/State ow model “Skeleton” is generated from the
SysML model by Syndeia, then the simulation specialist builds out the model with specialized code
and model elements to carry out the desired simulation. Periodically, the SysML and simulation
model structures are compared using Syndeia and updated, either by Syndeia or manually, to
resolve any critical di erences.
Next Steps
We o er this example primarily to inspire ideas in systems engineers in weapons development and
other defense domains looking to apply the principles of MBSE to their work. The combination of
high-level architectural modeling in SysML with a variety of connections into the larger engineering
model domain is a powerful combination for developing better systems faster, while maintaining
traceability and accurate documentation.
Related posts:
Name
Name
Submit
(http://pinterest.com/pin/create/button/?url=https://intercax.com/2018/08/07/mbse-for-
railgun-design-part-5/&media=https://intercax.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/simple-physics-
electromagnatic-railgun-1.png)
ABOUT AUTHOR
Dirk Zwemer
RECENT POSTS
OUR PARTNERS
(https://intercax.com/about/partners/)
Get all our latest posts, SysML models, resources and announcements directly in your inbox.
Name
Name
Email
Email
Submit
SEARCH BLOG
Services (https://intercax.com/services/)
Custom Software (https://intercax.com/services/custom-software/)
Conferences (https://intercax.com/news-events/conferences/)
Trainings (https://intercax.com/?page_id=24256)
Webinars (https://intercax.com/news-events/webinars/)
Blog (https://intercax.com/blog/)
About (https://intercax.com/about/)
Partners (https://intercax.com/about/partners/)
Testimonials (https://intercax.com/about/testimonials/)
Careers (https://intercax.com/about/careers/)
ParaMagic® (https://intercax.com/products/paramagic/)
Melody™ (https://intercax.com/products/melody/)
ParaSolver™ (https://intercax.com/products/parasolver/)
Solvea™ (https://intercax.com/products/solvea/)
©Intercax 47 Perimeter Center East Suite 410 Atlanta, GA 30346-2001 USA Phone:+1-404-592-6897