Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • NC 59 of 64 - Blood Gases

    Uploaded by

    chempathppukm jpmd
    6 views2 pages
    This document compares the measurements of pH, pCO2, and pO2 between two GEM Premier 3500 machines (GEM A with serial number 2008 4061 and GEM B with serial number 2008 4062) using 53 blood samples. Regression graphs show that for pH, pCO2, and pO2, the measurements of GEM B strongly correlate with GEM A, with R2 values of 0.987, 0.9903, and 0.9936 respectively, indicating the two machines produce near identical measurements.

    Original Description:

    Original Title

    NC 59 of 64 - Blood Gases (1)

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document compares the measurements of pH, pCO2, and pO2 between two GEM Premier 3500 machines (GEM A with serial number 2008 4061 and GEM B with serial number 2008 4062) using 53 blood samples. Regression graphs show that for pH, pCO2, and pO2, the measurements of GEM B strongly correlate with GEM A, with R2 values of 0.987, 0.9903, and 0.9936 respectively, indicating the two machines produce near identical measurements.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf or txt
    6 views2 pages

    NC 59 of 64 - Blood Gases

    Uploaded by

    chempathppukm jpmd
    This document compares the measurements of pH, pCO2, and pO2 between two GEM Premier 3500 machines (GEM A with serial number 2008 4061 and GEM B with serial number 2008 4062) using 53 blood samples. Regression graphs show that for pH, pCO2, and pO2, the measurements of GEM B strongly correlate with GEM A, with R2 values of 0.987, 0.9903, and 0.9936 respectively, indicating the two machines produce near identical measurements.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 2

    4.

    3 Gem A (2008 4061) vs Gem B (2008 4062)

    Comparison pH, A (GEM A) & B (GEM B)


    7.600
    7.550 y = 1.0695x - 0.5162
    7.500 R² = 0.987
    Gem B (2008 4062)

    7.450
    7.400
    7.350
    7.300
    7.250
    7.200
    7.150
    7.100
    7.050
    7.100 7.200 7.300 7.400 7.500 7.600
    Gem A (2008 4061)

    Regression graph for pH, Comparison of correlation data between GEM PREMIER 3500
    (S/N: 2008 4061), vs GEM PREMIER 3500 (S/N: 2008 4062) for pH, correlate well with
    R²= 0.987(n= 53, blood samples)

    Comparison pCO2 , A (GEM A) & B (GEM B)


    90.0
    80.0 y = 1.0473x - 1.3986
    R² = 0.9903
    70.0
    Gem B (2008 4062)

    60.0
    50.0
    40.0
    30.0
    20.0
    10.0
    0.0
    0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0 70.0 80.0 90.0
    Gem A (2008 4061)

    Regression graph for pCO2, Comparison of correlation data between GEM PREMIER 3500
    (S/N: 2008 4061), vs GEM PREMIER 3500 (S/N: 2008 4062) for pCO2, correlate well with R²=
    0.9903. (n= 53, blood samples)
    Comparison pO2, A (GEM A) & B (GEM B)
    250.0

    y = 1.0519x - 2.5483
    200.0 R² = 0.9936
    Gem B (2008 4062)

    150.0

    100.0

    50.0

    0.0
    0.0 50.0 100.0 150.0 200.0 250.0
    Gem A (2008 4061)

    Regression graph for pO2, Comparison of correlation data between GEM PREMIER 3500
    (S/N: 2008 4061), vs GEM PREMIER 3500 (S/N: 2008 4062) for pO2, correlate well with R²=
    0.9936. (n= 53, blood samples)

    You might also like