Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Palm Oil Fuel Ash As Partial Replacement of Cement in Concrete IJERTV6IS030514
Palm Oil Fuel Ash As Partial Replacement of Cement in Concrete IJERTV6IS030514
B. Mix Proportioning
The proportioning of ingredients of concrete is done as
per IS 10262:2009. It depends upon factors like quality and
quantity of cement, water and aggregate, batching, mixing,
placing, compaction and curing. The target compressive
strength was 40Mpa and water to binder ratio was 0.3, five
samples were prepared, in which one is the control mix of 0% Fig.1 Variation of Compressive Strength
POFA. Cement is replaced by 5% 10% 15% 20% in rest of
the samples .we have named the mix as concrete palm oil ash From the table and graph it is observed than that maximum
and denoted it as CP. The mix design of each sample is given value for compressive strength is obtained for 10% percent
in the table below. The mixing and compaction of the replacement. Beyond this optimum point compressive
samples were done as per Indian standards. strength began to decrease.
B. Flexural strength
Table 5. Mix design for 1 m3 concrete
It is also known as modulus of rupture or bend strength. It
Cement Water Fine Coarse Super can be defined as the capacity of a beam of concrete to resist
Kg Kg aggregate aggregate Plasticizer
Kg Kg Kg
failure due to bending. Flexural strength test was conducted
450 135 783.45 1146.23 0.9 on a test specimen of size100mm X 100mm X 150 mm for a
Curing period of 28 days and 56 days. Test results are given
below.
Table 6. Flexural strength test results The results shows that maximum value of tensile strength is
SI.No Mix Id Flexural obtained for 10% replacement of POFA
Strength(N/Mm2)
V. CONCLUSION
28 days 56 days
1. CP0 3.87 4.09 Partial replacement of cement with palm oil ash
2. CP5 3.89 4.13 shows variation in strength properties of concrete
3. CP10 4.07 4.36 POFA replacement of up to 10% as a cementitious
4. CP15 3.94 4.21
material enhanced the compressive strength,
5. CP20 3.85 4.10
Flexural strength, Split tensile strength of concrete
compared to the specimen without POFA in their
composition.
Increase in the POFA replacement beyond certain
limit causes decrease in the strength properties
POFA used as cement replacement increases large
utilization of waste products
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The authors wish to thank Asst professor Preethi M for
valuable and helpful discussions. We gratefully acknowledge
technical and economic support from Civil engineering
Fig.2 Variation of Flexural Strength
department, Federal Institute of Science And Technology,
From the table and graph it is evident that flexural strength Kerala.
increases with increase in percentage of POFA. Maximum REFERENCES
strength is obtained for 10% replacement
[1] G. Eason, B. Noble, and I.N. Sneddon, “On certain integrals of
C. Split tensile strength Lipschitz-Hankel type involving products of Bessel functions,”
Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. London, vol. A247, pp. 529-551, April
The tensile strength of concrete is one of the basic and 1955. (references)
important properties. Test is conducted on cylindrical [2] J. Clerk Maxwell, A Treatise on Electricity and Magnetism, 3rd
specimen of diameter 150mm and height 300mm. curing ed., vol. 2. Oxford: Clarendon, 1892, pp.68-73.
period adopted was 7 days and 28 days. Average split tensile [3] S. Jacobs and C.P. Bean, “Fine particles, thin films and exchange
strength for various mixes during 7 day and 28 day curing are anisotropy,” in Magnetism, vol. III, G.T. Rado and H. Suhl, Eds.
New York: Academic, 1963, pp. 271-350.
shown. [4] K. Elissa, “Title of paper if known,” unpublished
Table 7. Split tensile strength test results [5] R. Nicole, “Title of paper with only first word capitalized,” J.
Name Stand. Abbrev., in press
Sl.No Mix Id Split Tensile [6] Y. Yorozu, M. Hirano, K. Oka, and Y. Tagawa, “Electron
Strength(N/Mm2) spectroscopy studies on magneto-optical media and plastic
substrate interface,” IEEE Transl. J. Magn. Japan, vol. 2, pp. 740-
7 days 28 days 741, August 1987 [Digests 9th Annual Conf. Magnetics Japan, p.
1. CP0 2.56 3.11 301, 1982].
2. CP5 2.56 3.13
[7] M. Young, The Technical Writer’s Handbook. Mill Valley, CA:
3. CP10 2.81 3.27 University Science, 1989.
4. CP15 2.69 3.20
5. CP20 2.55 3.08