Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Chapter 15 - Short-Term Scheduling
Chapter 15 - Short-Term Scheduling
Chapter 15
Short-Term Scheduling
Learning Objectives
1
11/29/2022
Learning Objectives
Delta Airlines
2
11/29/2022
Short-Term Scheduling
Scheduling
3
11/29/2022
Importance of Short-Term
Scheduling
Effective and efficient scheduling can be
a competitive advantage
Faster movement of goods through a
facility means better use of assets and
lower costs
Additional capacity resulting from faster
throughput improves customer service
through faster delivery
Good schedules result in more reliable
deliveries
7
Scheduling Issues
4
11/29/2022
Scheduling Decisions
Organization Managers Schedule the Following
Hospital Operating room use
Patient admissions
Nursing, security, maintenance staffs
Outpatient treatments, support services
Scheduling
Flow
10
10
5
11/29/2022
11
11
12
12
6
11/29/2022
13
13
14
7
11/29/2022
Scheduling Criteria
15
15
Different Processes/
Different Approaches
Different Processes Suggest Different Approaches to
TABLE 15.2
Scheduling
Process-focused facilities (job shops)
Scheduling to customer orders where changes in both volume and variety
of jobs/clients/patients are frequent
Schedules are often due-date focused, with loading refined by finite
loading techniques
Examples: foundries, machine shops, cabinet shops, print shops, many
restaurants, and the fashion industry
Repetitive facilities (assembly lines)
Schedule module production and product assembly based on frequent
forecasts
Finite loading with a focus on generating a forward-looking schedule
JIT techniques are used to schedule components that feed the assembly
line
Examples: assembly lines for washing machines at Whirlpool and
automobiles at Ford.
16
16
8
11/29/2022
Different Processes/
Different Approaches
Different Processes Suggest Different Approaches
TABLE 15.2
to Scheduling
Product-focused facilities (continuous)
Schedule high volume finished products of limited variety to meet a
reasonably stable demand within existing fixed capacity
Finite loading with a focus on generating a forward-looking schedule that
can meet known setup and run times for the limited range of products
Examples: huge paper machines at International Paper, beer in a
brewery at Anheuser-Busch, and potato chips at Frito-Lay
17
17
Scheduling Process-
Focused Facilities
18
18
9
11/29/2022
Loading Jobs
19
19
Input-Output Control
20
20
10
11/29/2022
21
21
22
11
11/29/2022
1. Correcting performances
2. Increasing capacity
3. Increasing or reducing input to
the work center
23
23
Gantt Charts
24
12
11/29/2022
25
25
A Scheduled
activity time
allowed
Actual work
B Maintenance
progress
Nonproduction
time
Point in time
C when chart is
reviewed
Now 26
26
13
11/29/2022
Assignment Method
27
27
Assignment Method
TYPESETTER
JOB A B C
R-34 $11 $14 $ 6
S-66 $ 8 $10 $11
T-50 $ 9 $12 $ 7
28
28
14
11/29/2022
Assignment Method
29
29
Assignment Method
3. Subtract the smallest number not
covered by a line from all other
uncovered numbers. Add the same
number to any number at the intersection
of two lines. Return to step 2.
4. Optimal assignments are at zero
locations in the table. Select one, draw
lines through the row and column
involved, and continue to the next
assignment.
30
30
15
11/29/2022
Assignment Example
Typesetter
A B C
Job
R-34 $11 $14 $ 6
S-66 $ 8 $10 $11
T-50 $ 9 $12 $ 7
31
Assignment Example
32
16
11/29/2022
Assignment Example
33
Assignment Example
Step 4 - Assignments
Typesetter Typesetter
A B C A B C
Job Job
R-34 $11 $14 $ 6 R-34 $ 3 $ 4 $ 0
S-66 $ 8 $10 $11 S-66 $ 0 $ 0 $ 5
T-50 $ 9 $12 $ 7 T-50 $ 0 $ 1 $ 0
34
17
11/29/2022
Sequencing Jobs
35
35
Sequencing Example
36
18
11/29/2022
Sequencing Example
37
Sequencing Example
38
19
11/29/2022
Sequencing Example
39
Sequencing Example
40
20
11/29/2022
Sequencing Example
41
Sequencing Example
42
21
11/29/2022
Sequencing Example
43
Sequencing Example
44
22
11/29/2022
Sequencing Example
Summary of Rules
Average Average Number Average
Completion Utilization of Jobs in Lateness
Rule Time (Days) (%) System (Days)
FCFS 15.4 36.4 2.75 2.2
45
45
Comparison of
Sequencing Rules
No one sequencing rule excels on all criteria
1. SPT does well on minimizing flow time and number
of jobs in the system
• But SPT moves long jobs to
the end which may result in
is dissatisfied customers
2. FCFS does not do especially
well (or poorly) on any criteria
but is perceived as fair by
customers
3. EDD minimizes maximum
lateness
46
46
23
11/29/2022
47
47
48
24
11/29/2022
49
49
50
50
25
11/29/2022
51
51
52
52
26
11/29/2022
53
53
Time 0 3 10 20 28 33
WC
1 B E D C A
Idle
WC
2
Job
completed
54
54
27
11/29/2022
Time 0 3 10 20 28 33
WC
1 B E D C A
Idle
WC
2 B E D C A
Job
Time 0 1 3 5 7 9 10 11 12 13 17 19 21 22 2325 27 29 31 33 35 completed
55
B E D CA
55
Limitations of Rule-Based
Dispatching Systems
56
56
28
11/29/2022
57
57
• Expert
systems Setups and
run time
• Simulation
models
Figure 15.5
58
58
29
11/29/2022
59
59
60
30
11/29/2022
Advantages include:
1. Lower inventory levels
2. Faster product throughput
3. Improved component quality
4. Reduced floor-space requirements
5. Improved communications
6. Smoother production process
61
61
Scheduling Services
Service systems differ from manufacturing
MANUFACTURING SERVICES
Schedules machines Schedule staff
and materials
Inventories used to Seldom maintain inventories
smooth demand
Machine-intensive and demand Labor-intensive and demand may
may be smooth be variable
Scheduling may be bound by Legal issues may constrain
union contracts flexible scheduling
Few social or behavioral issues Social and behavioral issues may
be quite important
62
62
31
11/29/2022
Scheduling Services
63
Scheduling Services
64
64
32
11/29/2022
65
66
33
11/29/2022
67
67
DAY M T W T F S S
Staff required 5 5 6 5 4 3 3
M T W T F S S
Employee 1 5 5 6 5 4 3 3
Capacity (Employees)
Excess Capacity 68
68
34
11/29/2022
M T W T F S S
Employee 1 5 5 6 5 4 3 3
Employee 2 4 4 5 4 3 3 3
Capacity (Employees)
Excess Capacity 69
69
M T W T F S S
Employee 1 5 5 6 5 4 3 3
Employee 2 4 4 5 4 3 3 3
Employee 3 3 3 4 3 2 3 3
Capacity (Employees)
Excess Capacity 70
70
35
11/29/2022
M T W T F S S
Employee 1 5 5 6 5 4 3 3
Employee 2 4 4 5 4 3 3 3
Employee 3 3 3 4 3 2 3 3
Employee 4 2 2 3 2 2 3 2
Capacity (Employees)
Excess Capacity 71
71
M T W T F S S
Employee 1 5 5 6 5 4 3 3
Employee 2 4 4 5 4 3 3 3
Employee 3 3 3 4 3 2 3 3
Employee 4 2 2 3 2 2 3 2
Employee 5 1 1 2 2 2 2 1
Capacity (Employees)
Excess Capacity 72
72
36
11/29/2022
M T W T F S S
Employee 1 5 5 6 5 4 3 3
Employee 2 4 4 5 4 3 3 3
Employee 3 3 3 4 3 2 3 3
Employee 4 2 2 3 2 2 3 2
Employee 5 1 1 2 2 2 2 1
Employee 6 1 1 1 1 1 1 0
Capacity (Employees)
Excess Capacity 73
73
M T W T F S S
Employee 1 5 5 6 5 4 3 3
Employee 2 4 4 5 4 3 3 3
Employee 3 3 3 4 3 2 3 3
Employee 4 2 2 3 2 2 3 2
Employee 5 1 1 2 2 2 2 1
Employee 6 1 1 1 1 1 1 0
Employee 7 1
Capacity (Employees) 5 5 6 5 4 3 3
Excess Capacity 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 74
74
37
11/29/2022
Staff Scheduling
Schedule Bidding
Schedule Optimization
75
75
38