Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 9 views

    TE PIMS 3280 BRA BrazilianMangroves TE Report Annex 6 EvaluationMatrix

    Uploaded by

    Danuka Panangala
    This evaluation matrix outlines criteria and questions to evaluate a project. It includes indicators, means of verification, and methodology for each criterion. The criteria cover project strategy/formulation, implementation/adaptive management, partnerships, M&E systems, co-finance, financial execution, and agency performance. Key questions focus on assumptions, risks, activities/deliverables, lessons learned, national policies, challenges faced, participation, SMART indicators, guidance of implementation, committed funds, coordination, reporting, resources provided. Documentation analysis, interviews, and focus groups will be used to evaluate based on project documents, peer literature, policies, reports, and stakeholder assessments.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    TE PIMS 3280 BRA BrazilianMangroves TE Report Annex 6 EvaluationMatrix

    Uploaded by

    Danuka Panangala
    9 views6 pages
    This evaluation matrix outlines criteria and questions to evaluate a project. It includes indicators, means of verification, and methodology for each criterion. The criteria cover project strategy/formulation, implementation/adaptive management, partnerships, M&E systems, co-finance, financial execution, and agency performance. Key questions focus on assumptions, risks, activities/deliverables, lessons learned, national policies, challenges faced, participation, SMART indicators, guidance of implementation, committed funds, coordination, reporting, resources provided. Documentation analysis, interviews, and focus groups will be used to evaluate based on project documents, peer literature, policies, reports, and stakeholder assessments.

    Original Description:

    Original Title

    TE_PIMS_3280_BRA_BrazilianMangroves_TE_Report_Annex_6_EvaluationMatrix

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This evaluation matrix outlines criteria and questions to evaluate a project. It includes indicators, means of verification, and methodology for each criterion. The criteria cover project strategy/formulation, implementation/adaptive management, partnerships, M&E systems, co-finance, financial execution, and agency performance. Key questions focus on assumptions, risks, activities/deliverables, lessons learned, national policies, challenges faced, participation, SMART indicators, guidance of implementation, committed funds, coordination, reporting, resources provided. Documentation analysis, interviews, and focus groups will be used to evaluate based on project documents, peer literature, policies, reports, and stakeholder assessments.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf or txt
    9 views6 pages

    TE PIMS 3280 BRA BrazilianMangroves TE Report Annex 6 EvaluationMatrix

    Uploaded by

    Danuka Panangala
    This evaluation matrix outlines criteria and questions to evaluate a project. It includes indicators, means of verification, and methodology for each criterion. The criteria cover project strategy/formulation, implementation/adaptive management, partnerships, M&E systems, co-finance, financial execution, and agency performance. Key questions focus on assumptions, risks, activities/deliverables, lessons learned, national policies, challenges faced, participation, SMART indicators, guidance of implementation, committed funds, coordination, reporting, resources provided. Documentation analysis, interviews, and focus groups will be used to evaluate based on project documents, peer literature, policies, reports, and stakeholder assessments.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 6

    Annex 6.

    Evaluation Matrix

    Evaluation Questions Indicator Means of verification Methodology


    criterion/
    dimension
    Are the project assumptions
    valid?
    Project assumptions are
    Were all the risks to the project
    confirmed by peer reviewed Peer reviewed literature,
    strategy properly considered?
    literature, government policy government policy documents Document analysis
    Do the proposed sequence of
    documents and other relevant and other relevant literature
    activities and deliverables lead to
    literature
    the hypothesized outcomes and
    Project strategy impacts (given the time and
    and resources constraints?
    formulation Have lessons learned from other Individual semi-structured
    similar initiatives been Assessment by key project interview and/or Focus group
    Key project stakeholders
    incorporated into the project stakeholders discussion (FDG)
    design?

    Was the project prompted by Project concept and idea can be Government policy documents Document analysis
    national assessments or policies traced back to government Individual semi-structured
    Key project stakeholders
    or at national initiative? policy and initiative interview and/or FDG
    Evaluation Questions Indicator Means of verification Methodology
    criterion/
    dimension
    Documented changes effected in
    Project Did the project cope with the project document/ work
    Project reports and minutes of
    implementation challenges, risks and socio- plans/ management Document analysis
    meetings
    & adaptive political changes during the arrangements in response to
    challenges
    management. project implementation?
    Assessment by key project Individual semi-structured
    Key project stakeholders
    stakeholders interview and/or FDG
    Did the project management Degree to which relevant groups Project reports and minutes of
    structures or local participatory were included in the project meetings
    Document analysis
    Partnership venues/ groups include all management structures or Government, NGO and private
    agreements groups/ organizations affected participatory venues/ groups sectors papers and reports
    by the project or with capacity to Assessment by key project Individual semi-structured
    Key project stakeholders
    affect the project? stakeholders interview and/or FDG
    Logframe indicators have SMART
    Project logical framework Document analysis
    Did the logframe indicators characteristics
    comply with SMART criteria? Assessment by implementing, by implementing, executing Individual semi-structured
    executing agency and PMU agency and PMU interview and/or FDG
    minutes of steering/ technical
    M&E system committee meetings,
    documented modifications of
    Did the M&E system guide Degree to which the M&E system
    work plans and project Document analysis
    project implementation? guided project implementation
    document based on monitoring
    results, and project management
    of the midterm review 

    Evaluation Questions Indicator Means of verification Methodology
    criterion/
    dimension
    PMU quantified and documented
    Project and audit reports Document analysis
    Was committed co-finance committed co-funds
    delivered as committed? Individual semi-structured
    Assessment by co-financiers Co-financiers
    interview and/or FDG
    Co-finance Project and co-financier’s reports
    Did the project and its
    reflect coordination and Project and co-financiers reports Document analysis
    implementing/ executing
    mutually acknowledge results
    agencies coordinate with co-
    Individual semi-structured
    financers projects and initiatives? Assessment by co-financiers Co-financiers
    interview and/or FDG
    Concordance between yearly
    Was disbursement and
    budgets and expenditure and Work plans and combined
    expenditure effected in a timely
    delivery reports (CDR)
    and transparent manner? delivery schedule) and if

    Financial Were reporting and Document analysis


    execution
    accountability lines clear and in
    compliance with UNDP and External audit reports reveal
    External audit reports
    compliance with actions required
    national rules (as shown in)
    Evaluation Questions Indicator Means of verification Methodology
    criterion/
    dimension
    Reports are honest and truthfully
    reveal project progress and PIRs Document analysis
    Did implementing and executing shortcomings
    agency provide the necessary Assessment by key project Individual semi-structured
    Key project stakeholders
    Agency resources and technical and stakeholders interview and/or FDG
    performance administrative support for the Work plans concord with the
    Project work plans Document analysis
    implementation of the project? project’s logical framework
    Key stakeholders aware of
    Individual semi-structured
    project objectives, outcomes, Key project stakeholders
    interview and/or FDG
    outputs and actions
    Agreement between project
    Did the project support national, objective and outcomes with Policy documents Document analysis
    subnational or local, formal or policy objective
    informal policy objectives? Assessment by key project Individual semi-structured
    Key project stakeholders
    stakeholders interview and/or FDG
    Relevance
    Agreement between project
    Was the project framed within objective and outcomes with GEF Policy documents Document analysis
    GEF biodiversity strategy, UNDP’s 4, CPD and UNDAF
    CPD and UNDAF? Assessment by key project Individual semi-structured
    Key project stakeholders
    stakeholders interview and/or FDG
    Project reports, grey literature,
    Logical framework indicators Document analysis
    Did the project achieved its peer reviewed literature
    Effectiveness
    expected targets? Assessment by key project Individual semi-structured
    Key project stakeholders
    stakeholders interview and/or FDG
    Project reports, grey literature,
    Efficiency Was the project cost-effective? Positive cost-benefit analysis Document analysis
    peer reviewed literature
    Evaluation Questions Indicator Means of verification Methodology
    criterion/
    dimension
    Number and distribution of
    Project reports, grey literature,
    threatened species associated Document analysis
    peer reviewed literature
    Did the project cause changes in with mangroves
    drivers of ecological status? Project reports, grey literature,
    Changes in area covered by
    peer reviewed literature, maps, Document analysis
    mangroves
    aerial or satellite imagery
    Changes in average monthly
    Impact Project reports, grey literature,
    Has the project caused changes household income or Document analysis
    peer reviewed literature
    in the socio-economic status of consumption
    intended beneficiaries? Assessment by key project Individual semi-structured
    Key project stakeholders
    stakeholders interview and/or FDG
    Has the project caused Individual semi-structured
    Assessment by key project
    behavioral or value changes of Key project stakeholders interview and/or FDG
    stakeholders
    key stakeholders? Structured observation
    Project reports, grey literature,
    Status and trends of public Document analysis
    peer reviewed literature
    budgets and expenditure on
    Individual semi-structured
    mangrove protected areas Key project stakeholders
    Are there any financial risks to interview and/or FDG
    Sustainability
    project sustainability? Project reports, grey literature,
    Document analysis
    Status and trends of the peer reviewed literature
    protected area financial gap Individual semi-structured
    Key project stakeholders
    interview and/or FDG
    Evaluation Questions Indicator Means of verification Methodology
    criterion/
    dimension
    Degree to which project Individual semi-structured
    Key project stakeholders
    interview and/or FDG
    stakeholders see that it is in their
    Are there any socio-economic interest that project benefits
    risks to project sustainability? Policy documents produced by
    continue to flow Document analysis
    project stakeholders

    The current or foreseeable policy


    Project reports, policy and legal
    and regulatory framework
    documents, grey literature, peer Document analysis
    Sustainability Are there institutional risks to sustain project-developed
    reviewed literature
    project sustainability? mechanisms
    Assessment by key project Individual semi-structured
    Key project stakeholders
    stakeholders interview and/or FDG
    Threatened species associated
    with mangroves have the Project reports, grey literature,
    Document analysis
    Are there environmental risks to capacity to recover at the peer reviewed literature
    project sustainability? current threat level
    Assessment by key project Individual semi-structured
    Key project stakeholders
    stakeholders interview and/or FDG

    You might also like