Last Name

Student’s Name

Professor’s Name

Course Number

Date

Summary

The Wrongfulness of Euthanasia commences by saying that euthanasia is becoming more

acceptable in contemporary culture. The author explains euthanasia and then presents reprisals

for why euthanasia is not ethically nor factually correct. Ending someone's existence is still

euthanasia, and almost all the reasons cannot explain such a decision.

Everyone has an innate desire to live longer. Human reactions and reflexes are designed

to help people resist intruders, avoid feral creatures, and avoid being hit by vehicles. They take

the required precautions and attention to safeguard themselves. This inherent purpose of survival

is violated by euthanasia. It is going against nature since all of mankind's functions are geared

towards physical survival. Euthanasia undermines these nuanced systems in a manner that

sickness and damage might not in a given circumstance, as it “violates the nature and dignity of

human beings” (Vaughn 280). Modern medicine has rigorous criteria of perfection and a track

history of success, yet it lacks flawless and broad understanding. The risks of euthanasia are just

too enormous for anybody to consider supporting it in any manner. The first slick step might

easily escalate to a catastrophic and dangerous collapse. For the most part, healthcare workers

are completely dedicated to ensuring safety. Euthanasia could have a corrosive effect, causing

medical professionals to fail to develop the skills necessary sufficiently to rescue the patients in

any scenario.
 Nevertheless, euthanasia is more than just a painless death. It may have been a case of

felony murder. Euthanasia is not simply about death, but a way of killing.
 Works cited

Vaughn, Lewis. Doing ethics: Moral reasoning and contemporary issues. WW Norton &

Company, 2015.