Professional Documents
Culture Documents
wp1 Final Version
wp1 Final Version
wp1 Final Version
Di(Elwin) Feng
Writing 2
6 December 2022
I want to start with a test. Don't worry. It's easy. To complete the test, all you need is to
(PowerPoint page 1)
It's not hard, right? You looked at the picture. Not needing half a second you can say he’s the
second from the left, whose hair is pink. This is such a stupid question, but don't be urgent to
speak it out. Hold on for a second and think about how your brain worked so efficiently to
accomplish the process. It seems easy. You saw it and your brain worked to tell you the answer.
Feng 2
However, the whole process is inconceivably complicated and it took cognitive psychologists
I will try to sum up the astonishing process in a couple of sentences. First, while you
heard my question-"finding the guy in the white shirt", your eardrums responded to the sound
waves, and your auditory nerves attaching the eardrums transduced all the auditory information
to electronic signals. Then, the electronic signals acted by action potentials carried the auditory
signal to relative brain regions. (PowerPoint page 2) Transferring outside stimuli to neural
signals is a bottom-up process named by cognitive psychologists. They usually use the
bottom-up process to describe brain activities affected by the outside world. In the previous
situation, your auditory system received the pitch signals and reported them to your brain, so
your brain started automatically operating on the meaning of words. Another bottom-up process
was while hearing the question command, your optic nerves simultaneously acquired the visual
(PowerPoint page 3)
While your visual and auditory brain areas generated a basic understanding of the picture,
such as the corresponding visible color to the word white and the locational information of the
man, your language system could begin to organize suitable languages to describe the position.
For example, he’s the second from the left and has pink hair. It is worth mentioning that if you
concentrated merely on the features of the man in a white shirt and ignored others after noticing
my question, your brain was in a top-down process, which described how your thought
influenced your perception and attention. Okay, while processing all the previous steps, your
brain warrants 100 billion neurons to fire, a pretty large number, but only takes half a second.
(PowerPoint page 4)
Feng 3
The human brain is really fascinating (Tip: Pause for a second). A few years before,
things that humans could pay attention to were limited. For example, can you remember the hair
color of the woman wearing glasses in the previous picture? (Tip: after a few seconds back to the
picture) It’s blond. I believe most people cannot remember it. If you are a genius, please never
mind.
Since as humans we cannot notice all the details going through our daily life, our brains
have to filter unnecessary information and retain the useful ones. Therefore, you can merely
concentrate your attention on useful things. If there is too much information for you to focus on,
you also won’t handle them at the same time. Here’s an “orange juice” model that psychologists
used for describing human attention. (PowerPoint page 5) They said attention could be regarded
as a fixed amount of “orange juice”. Our brains could split it into different cups, which were the
information we paid attention to, but the more we divided it the less we got the amount in each
cup, which meant if there were distractors, additional cups, that attenuated our attention, it took
In order to shorten response time, our brains have developed skills to suppress or reject
salient distractions. Two types of regulators are functional to attenuate distractions. Being
accustomed to feature-based information can reduce the time to find specific items. On the other
hand, being distracted by an object having a shape or color increases the tendency to ignore it
next time. (PowerPoint page 6) For location-based information that often guides attention toward
a probable location decreases item-finding time. Otherwise, it shortens rejection time from
distractors. These two types of regulators build up the selection history in our brains, which
produces a faster response time when your brain is requested to process similar visual captures.
Feng 4
(PowerPoint page 7)
Let’s bring the concepts to a real-life situation. Dany is at a pool party. He is looking for
his girlfriend. Because it isn’t the first time they come to the party, Dany knows his girlfriend
loves to sit at the south corner near the pool and she’s wearing a fluorescent yellow bikini as
always, so the location and feature regularities guide his attention toward the corner and anything
(PowerPoint page 8)
Let’s see if there are some distractors. In the first situation, Dany’s girlfriend isn’t the
only one wearing a fluorescent yellow bikini. Actually, the dress code for the party is wearing
something fluorescent, so a lot of color distraction blocks Dany’s attentional captures based on
features. He can merely follow location-based clues. He learns it pretty fast and no longer relies
on color as a clue. In this situation, without the feature regularity of color, Dany takes more time
(PowerPoint page 9)
In another condition, Dany checks the place where his girlfriend usually sits.
Unfortunately, she isn't there. But this time the party doesn’t have a dress code, so there aren’t a
lot of people wearing fluorescent colors. Dany no longer looks for the place at the corner and
starts to look for the color “yellow.” This condition removes a locational clue, which also needs
After learning the example, I hope you have a better understanding of how attention
serves the visual system to filter the world. Both feature-based and color-based information help
you guide your attention and attenuate the time spent on visual filtration. This kind of filtration is
automatically happening all the time. After my presentation, I hope you can think and try to
understand how your visual system and attention work together to help you see things and make
● Elaborate on the process of visual perception, and introduce top-down and bottom-up
theories.
● Introduce the “juice” model, and how factors guide your attention.
● Brief conclusion.
Feng 6
Reflection
Choosing the correct genre to accomplish the purpose of writing makes it halfway to
success, so understanding how one piece of content can be adequately translated into two genres
and serving different audience groups is paramount. For this assignment, I translated a journal
written by Brad T. Stilwell, Brett Bahle, and Shaun P. Vecer, to a Ted Talk script (2019). The
attentional capture study suggested that location-based and feature-based information could
guide visual attention away from or forward to a target. I considered several questions to help me
develop a new genre while writing. They were how I should craft the script to suit the intended
audience, what the content differences made them disparate genres, what tones and materials I
should include in the new genre, and how I explained the professional concepts accurately and
absorbingly. My passion for translating a cognitive psychology topic is that although attentional
filtration and capture in visual perception are happening incessantly, people hardly have a chance
to know them and learn the mechanisms in life. From my perspective, comprehending our human
bodies is more crucial than learning about the physical outside world. Therefore, I wish to
Ted talks are a perfect medium to disseminate brilliant new ideas to the public, and it has
a customized audience group. Firstly, Ted Talks are free and accessible to everyone having a
mobile phone. This characteristic gives everyone a chance to start watching the presentation and
learn brief knowledge about the mechanism of attention. Secondly, the Ted Talk presentation is
designed for people interested in knowing mechanism of visual selection system but without
time or profession to read a psychological journal article. These characteristics tailor the Ted
Feng 7
Talk to a non-academic writing genre but require me to convey the concepts precisely and
succinctly. The translation also tests my ability to stand in the shoes of a nonprofessional
individual to describe professional ideas. Hence, the convention of the Ted Talk should be
rigorous and reachable for readers who do not have a knowledge background of cognition.
Thirdly, advanced progress in studying the areas of attention capture and filtration is rarely
known by the general public. The platform Ted Talk is a magnificent place to spread knowledge
to the folk by inviting influential people to present their new findings in their areas.
There are significant differences between a journal article and a Ted Talk. Defining their
similarities and distinctions helped me select the contents in the old genre and add examples to
the new genre while writing the script. A journal article chiefly focuses on a description of the
background of their study, data analysis, and repeatability of the experiments. However, none
would like to hear dull data analysis and complicated experimental design in a Ted Talk. The
major objective of a Ted Talk is to explain the new theories and provide the audience with
appropriate examples to help understand the theories, which concentrate on facts and intriguing
instances. Accordingly, I removed the data analysis and experimental designs in the Ted Talk
script. I then added corresponding daily life stories and pictures corresponding to the main
theories. One of the class reading materials enlightened me at this point. In the article “How to
Read Like a Writer”, Mike Bunn the author taught me while reading, I should try to understand
the ways that the author arranges the article (2021). Reading and writing can be juxtaposed. For a
journal article, the purpose is to instruct other scientists on how to repeat the experimental
process and explain the novel findings in the area. This is why a journal article has salient
subtitles and a strict format. However, my writing script serves as popular science material, so
adding an example regarding daily life to explain each concept can be perfect. Furthermore, I
Feng 8
included a number of intensifiers, such as “so”, “very”, and “really” in the script because for
presentation these words can be directly emphasized and there aren't a lot of strict rules for
non-using them. I also avoided writing it like a lecture script. The content of a lecture is more
intensive compared with a presentation and a lecture needs to highlight the significant
statements. In contrast, for the presentation, I designed more interactions than a lecture.
How constructing the Ted Talk and making the materials contribute to the audience are
all the twists and turns while writing. I watched some videos on the Ted website to gain a basic
understanding of its structure and learn their tones for conveying information. Subsequently, I
chose a light and amusing tone to write the script. I additionally made some PowerPoint pages,
tips in the script, and an outline after the script. Graphs are paramount as the visual aspect of a
Ted Talk. The script and the graphs are mutually beneficial to demonstrate the presentation
content. For the tips and outline, they provide the speaker with a concise and brief notification.
I was not confined by a presentation and intend to explore deeper in the subgenre of a popular
science Ted Talk. This is another helpful suggestion I learned from class reading. “Navigating
Genres” is an essay written by Kerry Dirk. Drik encourages students to explore new areas of a
genre and doesn’t want them to be limited by the old principles (2021). Therefore, I arranged the
cognitive concepts and examples to intersect and expanded some old concepts in the introduction
After submitting the first draft, I talked to Eugene. He suggested I imitate a real Ted talk
because every script is supposed to transfer into a video. I agreed with his idea, so I recorded a
presentation and believed the final version could achieve the ideal effect. Despite this, if
someone finds a real lecture hall and presents the script will make the effect of TedTalk better.
The presenter can include more body language than I do in the presentation. To serve the
Feng 9
audience understand the presentation materials, I added more PowerPoint pages to illustrate the
example. For instance, I had a pool picture of "Dany finding his girlfriend” example. I did not
draw the stick figures representing people and his girlfriend before but added the illustrations
while revising the script. By merely imagining the feature- or locational-based circumstances, the
audience without professional backgrounds may find it hard to comprehend the meaning of the
example. Therefore, I intended to include more pictures for the presentation about visual
cognition studies. Eugene pointed out a paragraph that was hard to understand. After reading it, I
realized that I included too much professional vocabulary without giving explanations to make it
hard to understand. Some terms I knew the meaning were unfamiliar to people without cognitive
psychology backgrounds. Then, I put myself in their shoes and reorganized the paragraph to
Works cited
Bunn, Mike. “How to Read Like a Writer.” Writing Space: Reading on writing, vol.1,Parlor
Press, 2021.
Dirk, Kerry. “Navigating Genres.” Writing Space: Reading on writing, vol.1,Parlor Press, 2021.
Everton, Alise. “Glow Stick Pool Party – Glow In The Dark Pool Party Themes”. Poolmagazine,
September 7,2021.
https://www.poolmagazine.com/lifestyle/throw-a-glow-stick-pool-party.
https://kidshelpline.com.au/young-adults/issues/staying-safe-parties-and-clubs.
Stilwell, B. T., Bahle, B., & Vecera, S. P. (2019). Feature-based Statistical Regularities of