Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1 s2.0 S1572665722003678 Main
1 s2.0 S1572665722003678 Main
A R T I C L E I N F O A B S T R A C T
Keywords: In an electrode reaction under a uniform vertical magnetic field, due to the tangential Lorentz force by the
Ionic vacancy interaction of the current lines and the magnetic field, a tornado-like rotation accompanied by a radial sec-
Nanobubble ondary flow and numerous microscopic vortexes (micro-magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) flows (micro-MHD
Microbubble flows)) emerges over a disk electrode with an insulator fringe (fringed vertical MHD electrode (fringed-
Copper deposition
VMHDE)). By utilizing as tracers, the microbubble clusters originating from the ionic vacancies created in a
Magnetic field
Vertical MHD flow
solution phase, the angular velocity of the rotation was measured for copper cathodic deposition. As a result,
not always the contribution of the current lines to the rotation but also the contribution of the micro-vortexes
to the mass transfer at the electrode were exactly determined. Namely, 4.71% of the whole current lines drives
the rotation, and 4.67% of the mass flux density of the radial secondary flow is converted to the diffusion cur-
rent by the mixing effect of the micro-MHD flows. Within the experimental error, the product of both values
2:20 103 was in good agreement with the value ð1:76 0:45Þ 103 obtained by the measurement of
the limiting-diffusion-current in Part 1.
1. Introduction parallel magnetic fields are proportional to B1=3 C4=3 where B is mag-
netic flux density and C is the concentration of the electroactive spe-
Over several decades, many researchers have been investigating cies. The magnetoelectrochemical effects at ultramicro-disk-electrodes
the analyses of electrochemical reactions using micro-disk-electrodes was performed by White and coworkers [4–6], and the magnetic field
under magnetic fields. Some of them we can refer as follows: Electro- effects on the limiting (steady state) current were studied by using cyc-
chemical impedance spectroscopy using micro-disk-electrodes in mag- lic voltammetry in non-aqueous systems containing organic reactants.
netic fields was first established by Olivier and coworkers [1–3]. At the They concluded that the magnetic field effect was attributed to the
same time, they derived that the steady-state currents measured under convective flow caused by the viscous drag of the electrolyte ions
⇑ Corresponding author.
E-mail addresses: s1871001@ipc.fukushima-u.ac.jp (S. Takagi), tasada@sss.fukushima-u.ac.jp (T. Asada), oshikiri@yamagata-cit.ac.jp (Y. Oshikiri), miura.makoto@tohoku-pc.ac.
jp (M. Miura), morimotoryoichi@mbn.nifty.com (R. Morimoto), sugiyama@aoni.waseda.jp, a.sugiyama@yoshinodenka.com (A. Sugiyama), iwao.mogi.d4@tohoku.ac.jp (I. Mogi),
ryoaochan@aol.com (R. Aogaki).
1
Present affiliation: Architectural Construction Systems Technology, Tohoku Polytechnic College, 26, Tsukidate Hagisawa Dobashi, Kurihara, Miyagi 987-2223, Japan.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelechem.2022.116375
Received 3 November 2021; Received in revised form 10 April 2022; Accepted 28 April 2022
Available online 02 May 2022
1572-6657/© 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
S. Takagi et al. Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry 916 (2022) 116375
Nomenclature
accelerated by the magnetic force. Recently, electrodeposition of cop- and oxygen gas evolutions [28–30]. The microbubbles result from
per on a conically shaped diamagnetic electrode under a vertical mag- the collisions of nanobubbles in the rotational boundary layer [10].
netic field has been examined by Mutschke and coworkers [7]. As for Here, the nanobubbles are produced by the collisions of ionic vacan-
magnet arrays of small cylindrical magnets, deposit patterns of catho- cies with the same sign in micro-MHD flows. On the other hand, the
dic electrodeposition reflecting the non-uniform magnetic field has collisions between ionic vacancies with opposite signs lead to the pair
been studies by Dunne and Coey. [8,9].
When a uniform vertical magnetic field is applied to a disk elec-
trode with an insulator fringe (fringed vertical magnetohydrodynamic
(MHD) electrode (fringed-VMHDE)), as shown in Fig. 1, a tornado-like
macroscopic rotation called vertical MHD flow (VMHD flow) emerges
over the electrode. As shown in Fig. 1, a VMHD flow is composed of
two parts; an upper cylindrical rotation (rotational-boundary-layer-
flow), and a lower radial secondary flow (radial-boundary-layer-flow),
so that as a whole, an ascending spiral stream arises from the elec-
trode, and the electrode surface is covered with ionic vacancies of
the same sign created in the electrode reaction. Due to the role of
atomic-scale lubricant of ionic vacancy, the surface is always kept free
without friction, while the surface of the insulator fringe is rigid with
friction, reducing the centrifugal force of the cylindrical rotation to
zero. As a result, losing the balance with the centrifugal force, the
residual pressure gradient induces an inward radial secondary flow,
forming the radial boundary layer with a vacancy layer on the elec-
trode [10].
A solvated ionic vacancy composing the vacancy layer is a free
space of the order of 0:1 nm enveloped by polarized solvent molecules,
which are further surrounded by an oppositely charged ionic cloud,
which arises from the conservations of the linear momentum and elec-
tric charge during the electron transfer [11,12]. The lifetime is about 1
s [13,14], and the nanobubbles arising from the collisions of ionic
vacancies [15] are specifically adsorbed on a copper electrode surface
to cause the three dimensional (3D) dendritic growth of copper deposit
[16]. As mentioned above, the atomic-level lubricants, i.e., ionic
vacancies drastically decrease the viscosity of the solution, so that in
copper cathodic deposition under a vertical magnetic field, micro-
scopic vortexes called micro- and nano-MHD flows are self-organized
on and in a vacancy layer, yielding chiral screw dislocations
[17–26]. The micro-MHD flows have been also optically observed by
Mogi and coworkers, where from the upper side, special tracers slowly
Fig. 1. Schematic of a VMHD flow on a fringed-VMHDE. A, copper disk
approached in rotation with the VMHD flow toward the tops of the
electrode; B, doughnut-shaped fringe of VMHDE; C, rotational-boundary-
micro-MHD flows, being scattered by them in drawing zigzag loci
layer-flow; D, radial-boundary-layer-flow.δ, thickness of the radial boundary
[27]. layer ( < 0:1 mm); lII , height of the rotational boundary layer (several mm) vin ,
The existence of the ionic vacancy has been experimentally vali- inner tangential velocity on the electrode; vout , outer tangential velocity on the
dated by observing microbubble clusters unrelated with hydrogen ! !
fringe; B , magnetic flux density, i , current density; z, z-axis.
2
S. Takagi et al. Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry 916 (2022) 116375
3
S. Takagi et al. Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry 916 (2022) 116375
as shown in Fig. 2, since based on electromagnetic theory, the current where Grig ðζ II Þ is a function of ζ II on the rigid fringe surface.
lines are assumed parallel to the magnetic field, Lorentz force becomes At the outer boundary of the rotational boundary layer ζ II ¼ 1, and
∼
zero. Therefore, the equation for the tangential velocity component of outside the electrode area, the solution rotates in a velocity of R Ω,
the inside area is expressed by ∼
where Grig ð1Þ ¼ 1: Therefore, substituting the relationship vout ¼ R Ω
@ 1 @
rv ¼ 0in into Eq. (6a), and using Eq. (4), we can derive the equation of the
@r r @r ð5aÞ angular velocity.
for 0 ≤ r ≤ R and 0 ≤ z ≤ lII
∼ !
Ω ¼ M I B ð7aÞ
where lII is the height of the rotational boundary layer, and vin implies
the tangential component of the velocity at the inside area, having the where M is the rotational coefficient expressed by
following function form.
γ VMHDE
∼ M≡ ð7bÞ
v ðζII Þ ¼ r Ω Gfre ðζII Þ
in 2πρνR
ð5bÞ
for 0≤r ≤R and 0 ≤ ζII ≤ 1 where the rotational direction is defined by the right-handed system;
∼ the sign corresponds to anticlockwise and clockwise rotations,
where Ω is the angular velocity of the rotation, Gfre ðζ II Þ is a function of respectively. In Fig. 3, the tangential velocity distributions inside and
ζ II on a free surface of the electrode, and ζ II is the z-coordinate normal- outside the electrode area are schematically illustrated.
ized by the height of the rotational boundary layer lII , ζ II ≡ z=lII . As men- As mentioned above, the insulator fringe surrounding the electrode
tioned above, the thickness of the radial boundary layer δ is much makes a pressure gradient toward the electrode center, which induces
smaller than the height of the rotational boundary layer lII , δ ≪ lII , so an inward radial secondary flow on the electrode surface (radial-
that the tangential component within the radial boundary layer is boundary-layer-flow). Solving the mass balance equation in the radial
expressed by vin ð0Þ, where ζ II ð¼ δ=lII Þ≈0. boundary layer, in Part 1 [10], we obtained the following limiting-dif-
The rotation of the inside area vin of the rotational boundary layer is fusion-current-equation on the free surface without friction covered
induced by the rotation of the outside area vout . Outside the electrode with ionic vacancies.
area, as discussed in Eq. (4), a constant Lorentz force f ϕ emerges, so
! 2
that we get the following equation. jI j ¼ Lfre B Cm ðz ¼ 1Þ ð8aÞ
where the rotational coefficient of the diffusion current on the free elec-
trode surface N fre is expressed by
1
ν
1 2
N fre ≡ 0:109 ν1 ɛγ 2
VMHDE zm FRρ ð9bÞ
Dm
∼
From the measurements of the angular velocity Ω and the limiting-
Fig. 3. Schematic of the tangential velocity distribution over a disk electrode diffusion-current jI j, using Eqs. (7a) and (9a), we can separately deter-
surrounded by an insulator fringe at the outer boundary of the rotational mine the values of ɛ and γ VMHDE . Namely, from Eq. (7b), we obtain.
boundary layer ðz ¼ lII Þ. A, electrode; B, fringe; R, electrode radius; R0 , outer
! γ VMHDE ¼ 2πρνRM ð10Þ
fringe radius; z, z-axis; B , magnetic flux density; lII , height of the rotational
boundary layer; v , inner tangential component of velocity on the electrode;
in
From Eq. (9b), we get.
vout , outer tangential component of velocity on the fringe.
4
S. Takagi et al. Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry 916 (2022) 116375
1 ν
ɛγ 2
VMHDE ¼ ðzm FRÞ2 νρ2 N fre ð11Þ
0:109 Dm
Therefore, from the values of M and N fre obtained by the measure-
∼
ment of the angular velocity of microbubble clusters Ω at a current jI j
!
under a magnetic flux density B , we can determine the exact values
of ɛ and γ VMHDE without any assumptions.
3. Experiment
5
S. Takagi et al. Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry 916 (2022) 116375
dient force on hydrogen gas bubbles acting as diamagnetic voids bles may arise from the cavitation in a high-speed rotation of the solu-
[8,34]. tion. Using Eq. (10) together with the other data such as diffusion
In Fig. 6, the difference of the formation process between the coefficient and kinematic viscosity mentioned above, we have
microbubble cluster and the hydrogen-gas-bubble is schematically
γ VMHDE ¼ 4:71 102 ð13Þ
illustrated: Fig. 6a represents the formation and rotation of the
∼
microbubble clusters in the upper rotational-boundary-layer-flow. On Then, in Fig. 8, in accordance with Eq. (9a), the angular velocity Ω
the other hand, as shown in Fig. 6b, the hydrogen-gas-bubbles gather- 2
!
ing to the electrode center in rotation visualize the lower radial-bound- was plotted against B Cm ðz ¼ 1Þ2 . The plot is also in good agree-
ary-layer-flow in a spiral mode on the free surface. ment with a straight line passing through the origin with the correla-
∼
In Fig. 7, according to Eq. (7a), we plotted the angular velocity Ω of tion coefficient ρcorr ¼ 0:9973; so that from the slope of the plot, we get
the microbubble cluster against the product of the current and the the rotational coefficient.
! N fre ¼ 3:516 104 s1 mol2 m6 T2
magnetic flux density I B . All the data follow a straight line passing
ð14Þ
through the origin with the correlation coefficient ρcorr ¼ 0:9932, so for ρcorr ¼ 0:9973
that as the slope of the plot, we obtained the rotational coefficient in Substituting the other data as well as Eq. (14) into Eq. (11), we
the following. obtain
4
ɛγ 2
VMHDE ¼ 1:04 10 ð15Þ
M ¼ 8:393 103 s1 A1 T1 for ρcorr ¼ 0:9932 ð12Þ
Substitution of Eq. (13) into Eq. (15) leads to
At the same time, because the rotational frequency is, at most, of
order of several 10 rpm, we can deny the possibility that the microbub-
Fig. 6. Difference of the formation process between microbubble clusters in the upper rotational-boundary-layer-flow and an agglomerate of hydrogen bubbles in
the lower radial-boundary-layer-flow. a, Formation of microbubble clusters by the collisions in the rotational-boundary layer-flow. b, Formation of the
!
agglomerates of hydrogen bubbles in the radial-boundary-layer-flow. A, electrode; B, fringe; C, rotational-boundary-layer-flow; D, radial-boundary-layer-flow. B ,
!
magnetic flux density; i , current density; z, z-axis; yellow sphere, microbubble arising from nanobubbles; the smaller and larger blue hemispheres, hydrogen
bubble stuck to the electrode and their agglomerate.
6
S. Takagi et al. Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry 916 (2022) 116375
Within the experimental error, the value of Eq. (17) agrees with the
average value with the standard deviation ɛγ VMHDE ¼ ð1:76 0:45Þ
103 obtained from the limiting-diffusion-currents measured by the
several experiments in Part 1 [10].
∼
As the angular velocity Ω is defined outside the radial boundary
layer, this experimental result indicates that the microbubble clusters
are evolved in the rotational boundary layer. All the rotations of the
microbubbles observed did not contain such scatterings by the micro-
scopic vortexes of the micro MHD flows as reported by Mogi et al [27],
which also suggests that as have been discussed initially, the measured
rotations occur in the upper part of the rotational boundary layer far
from micro MHD flows.
5. Conclusions
∼
The angular velocity of a VMHD flow Ω is expressed by two inde-
pendent equations Eqs. (7a) and (9a) of a VMHD flow; the former
comes from the Lorentz force rotating the upper part of the flow
∼ !
Fig. 7. Plot of the angular velocity Ω against jI j B for the microbubble ∼ (the rotational boundary layer), and the latter is derived from the dif-
clusters observed on a copper fringed-VMHDE in copper deposition. Ω,
−1 fusion current in the lower part on the electrode (the radial boundary
angular velocity of the VMHD flow (s ); jI j, absolute value of the current (A);
! layer). Therefore, from the measurement of the angular velocity and
B , absolute value of the applied magnetic flux density from 1 T to 10 T; ○,
Cm ðz ¼ 1Þ ¼ 30 mol m−3; □, Cm ðz ¼ 1Þ ¼ 40 mol m−3, where Cm ðz ¼ 1Þ is
the limiting-diffusion-current, we can determine the cell constant
the bulk concentration of Cu2+ ion in a CuSO4 + 500 mol m−3 H2SO4 solution γ VMHDE defined by the current line distribution over the electrode
(mol m−3). The slope value of the plot is M ¼ 8:393 103 s−1 A-1 T−1 for and the mixing coefficient ɛ concerning the microscopic vortexes
ρcorr ¼ 0:9932. called micro-MHD flows formed on the electrode surface. Then, it
was clarified that 4.71% of the whole current lines participates in
the rotation of the vertical MHD flow, and that the micro-MHD flows
convert 4.67% of the mass flux of the radial-boundary-layer-flow to
the diffusion current at the electrode. The accuracy of the values
was validated by the agreement within the experimental error of their
product ɛγ VMHDE ¼ 2:20 103 with the value
ɛγ VMHDE ¼ ð1:76 0:45Þ 103 obtained from the various measure-
7
S. Takagi et al. Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry 916 (2022) 116375