Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Hazardous Building Materials Assessment - April 26, 2016
Hazardous Building Materials Assessment - April 26, 2016
Hazardous Building Materials Assessment - April 26, 2016
Materials
Assessment
6532 and 6544 Winston
Churchill Boulevard,
Mississauga, Ontario
Prepared for:
Ideal Developments
1100 Rodick Road
Markham, Ontario, L3R 8C3
2016.04.2
6 12:35:59
-04'00'
Author: Owen Kirby, EPt
Project Technologist
905-363-1376
okirby@pinchin.com
2016.04.26
12:36:29
-04'00'
Reviewer: Mark Stroombergen, C.E.T.
Director - GTA
905-363-1381
mstroombergen@pinchin.com
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Ideal Developments (Client) retained Pinchin Ltd. (Pinchin) to conduct a hazardous building materials
assessment of the buildings located at 6532 and 6544 Winston Churchill Boulevard, Mississauga,
Ontario. Pinchin performed the assessment on April 11, 2016.
The objective of the assessment was to identify specified hazardous building materials in preparation for
building demolition. The results of this assessment are intended for use with a properly developed scope
of work and performance specification.
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
• Exterior Caulking.
Mercury: Mercury vapour is present in fluorescent lamps and liquid mercury is present in thermostat
ampules.
SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS
The following is a summary of significant recommendations; refer to the body of the report for detailed
recommendations.
2. Remove and properly dispose of PCB ballasts and mercury-containing items prior to
demolition.
3. Follow appropriate safe work procedures when handling or disturbing lead and silica.
Please refer to Section 4.0 of this report for detailed recommendations regarding administrative,
renovation or demolition activities.
This Executive Summary is subject to the same standard limitations as contained in the report and must
be read in conjunction with the entire report.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
APPENDICES
APPENDIX I Drawings
APPENDIX II-A Asbestos Analytical Certificates
APPENDIX II-B Lead Analytical Certificates
APPENDIX II-C PCB Analytical Certificates
APPENDIX III Methodology
Ideal Developments (Client) retained Pinchin Ltd. (Pinchin) to conduct a hazardous building materials
assessment of the buildings located at 6532 and 6544 Winston Churchill Boulevard, Mississauga,
Ontario.
Owen Kirby, EPt, Project Technologist performed the assessment on April 11, 2016. The surveyor was
accompanied by a representative of Ideal Developments during the assessment. 6544 was occupied and
the 6532 was vacant at the time of the assessment.
The objective of the assessment was to identify specified hazardous building materials in preparation for
building demolition. This assessment is intended to be used for pre-demolition purposes only, and may
not provide sufficient detail for long term management of hazardous materials as required by Health and
Safety regulations. The results of this assessment are intended for use with a properly developed scope
of work and performance specification.
The assessment was performed to establish the location and type of specified hazardous building
materials incorporated in the structure(s) and its finishes. The assessed area consisted of all parts of the
building.
For the purpose of the assessment and this report, hazardous building materials are defined as follows:
• Asbestos
• Lead
• Silica
• Mercury
• Mould
The following Ontario Designated Substances are not typically found in building materials in a
composition/state that is hazardous and were not included in this assessment:
• Arsenic
• Acrylonitrile
• Benzene
• Ethylene oxide
• Isocyanates
Year of 1958
Construction/Significant
Additions/Renovations (area
assessed)
Roof Shingles
3.0 FINDINGS
3.1 Asbestos
The following types of building materials may historically contain asbestos but were not observed in the
building and are not discussed in the report findings:
Photo 1
Hot Water Tank with Fibreglass insulation beneath metal sheeting
3.1.3 Vermiculite
Destructive testing was conducted of masonry block walls. The masonry block walls were penetrated in
Six (6) locations, loose fill vermiculite was not observed. The locations of destructive testing have been
indicated on the drawings in Appendix I.
One type of acoustic ceiling tile is present in the assessed area, as follows:
All ceiling tiles are presumed to be non-asbestos based on the material is not known to contain asbestos.
Photo 3
Non-asbestos 12”x12” nail-in, fibreboard
3.1.5 Plaster
Plaster is present on walls and ceilings in the buildings. Plaster does not contain asbestos (samples
A0005A-G).
Photo 3
Non-asbestos two layered plaster.
Paper
Sample Asbestos
Pattern, Colour Backing Locations (Quantity)
Number Type
(Yes/No)
White and Green Yes 6532 House – Kitchen, Location A0008A-C Chrysotile
Paper
Sample Asbestos
Pattern, Colour Backing Locations (Quantity)
Number Type
(Yes/No)
pattern. 3 (200SF)
Vinyl sheet flooring is considered to be potentially friable. Vinyl sheet flooring is in good condition.
Photo 4 Photo 5
Asbestos-containing vinyl sheet flooring is present in the Asbestos containing fibrous paper backing is adhered to the
Kitchen, Location 3 in both houses back of the vinyl sheet flooring.
Asbestos
Size, Pattern, Colour Sample Asbestos
Locations (Quantity) Type
and Photo Number Number Type (tile)
(mastic)
The vinyl floor tiles are non-friable and are in good condition.
Photo 6 Photo 7
Non-asbestos 9”x9”, Beige tile Asbestos-containing12”x12” pebble pattern tile is found in both
basements
Photo 8
Non-asbestos 12”x12” Beige tile, under asbestos containing vinyl sheet flooring
3.1.8 Caulking
Sample
Colour Locations (Quantity) Asbestos Type
Number
Photo 9
Photo10
Asbestos-containing caulking is present around windows of the
Asbestos-containing caulking is present around garage door.
Houses
3.1.9 Roofing
Non-asbestos blown-in cellulose insulation is present in the attic spaces of both buildings
Photo 11
Non-asbestos blown-in cellulose insulation
A number of materials which might contain asbestos were not sampled during the assessment due to
limitations in scope and methodology. Where present, these materials must be presumed to be an
asbestos material and are best sampled during project planning and preparation of contract documents
for their removal. Materials presumed to contain asbestos include:
3.2 Lead
A total of five (5) paint samples were collected from interior and exterior painted finishes. The following
table summarizes the analytical results for paints sampled and their locations.
Colour, Substrate
Sample Number Locations Lead (%)
Description
All paints containing lead were found to be in good condition and not flaking, peeling or delaminating.
Lead may be present in a number of materials which were not assessed and/or sampled. The following
materials, where found, should be considered to contain lead.
3.3 Silica
Crystalline silica is a presumed component of the following materials where present in the building:
• plaster
3.4 Mercury
3.4.1 Lamps
Mercury vapour is present in fluorescent lamps where present in the assessed area.
Photo12
Liquid mercury is present in the thermostat ampule.
3.5.1 Caulking
White and cream caulking is present at exterior windows and doors (sample PCB01- 6544 and PCB02-
6532) and contains <0.5 ppm PCBs. The material is a non-PCB solid based on the threshold given in
SOR/2008-273 (50 ppm).
The building has not been comprehensively re-lamped with new energy efficient light ballasts and lamps,
and as such, a percentage of light ballasts will be pre-1980 and contain PCBs.
Photo13
PCB containing light ballast may be present in old lighting fixtures.
3.5.3 Transformers
3.6 Mould
4.0 RECOMMENDATIONS
4.1 General
1. Prepare plans and performance specifications for hazardous material removal required
for the planned work. The specifications should include the scope of work, safe work
practices, personal protective equipment, respiratory protection, and disposal of waste
materials.
2. Provide this report and the detailed plans and specifications to the contractor prior to
bidding or commencing work.
3. Retain a qualified consultant to specify, inspect and verify the successful removal of
hazardous materials.
4. Update the asbestos inventory upon completion of the abatement and removal of
asbestos-containing materials.
The following recommendations are made regarding demolition or renovation involving the hazardous
materials identified.
4.2.1 Asbestos
For paints identified as having elevated levels of lead (i.e., greater than the EACO guideline of 0.1% for
lead-containing paints), construction disturbance may result in over-exposure to lead dust or fumes. The
need for work procedures, engineering controls and personal protective equipment should be assessed
on a site specific basis to comply with provincial standards or guidelines. Performing an exposure
assessment during work that disturbs lead in paints and coatings may be able to reduce the use of some
of these precautions.
Items painted with paints containing elevated levels of lead may be a hazardous waste. Test lead-painted
materials for leachable lead prior to disposal.
4.2.3 Silica
4.2.4 Mercury
Do not break lamps or separate liquid mercury from components. Recycle and reclaim mercury from
fluorescent lamps and thermostats when taken out of service. Liquid mercury is classified as a hazardous
waste and must be disposed of in accordance with local regulations.
4.2.5 PCBs
When light fixtures are removed, examine light ballasts for PCB content. If ballasts are not clearly labelled
as “non-PCB”, or are suspected to contain PCBs; package and ship ballasts for destruction at a federally
permitted facility.
4.2.6 Mould
No mould was observed; if mould is uncovered inside wall cavities during hand demolition, use
appropriate precautions and protect workers using methods that comply with provincial guidelines.
5.0 LIMITATIONS
Specific limitations related to the legal and financial and limitations to the scope of the current work are
outlined in our proposal, the attached Methodology and the Authorization to Proceed which accompanied
the proposal.
The work performed by Pinchin was conducted in accordance with generally accepted engineering or
scientific practices current in this geographical area at the time the work was performed. No warranty is
either expressed or implied by furnishing written reports or findings. The Client acknowledges that
subsurface and concealed conditions may vary from those encountered or inspected. Pinchin can only
comment on the environmental conditions observed on the date(s) the survey is performed. The work is
limited to those materials or areas of concern identified by the Client or outlined in our proposal. Other
areas of concern may exist but were not investigated within the scope of this assignment.
Pinchin makes no other representations whatsoever, including those concerning the legal significance of
its findings or as to other legal matters touched on in this report, including, but not limited to, ownership of
any property, or the application of any law to the facts set forth herein. With respect to regulatory
compliance issue, regulatory statutes are subject to interpretation and these interpretations may change
over time. Pinchin accepts no responsibility for consequential financial effects on transactions or property
values, or requirements for follow-up actions and costs.
The liability of Pinchin or our officers, directors, shareholders or staff will be limited to the lesser of the
fees paid or actual damages incurred by the Client. Pinchin will not be responsible for any consequential
or indirect damages. Pinchin will only be liable for damages resulting from the negligence of Pinchin.
Pinchin will not be liable for any losses or damage if the Client has failed, within a period of two years
following the date upon which the claim is discovered (Claim Period), to commence legal proceedings
against Pinchin to recover such losses or damage unless the laws of the jurisdiction which governs the
Claim Period which is applicable to such claim provides that the applicable Claim Period is greater than
two years and cannot be abridged by the contract between the Client and Pinchin, in which case the
Claim Period shall be deemed to be extended by the shortest additional period which results in this
provision being legally enforceable.
Information provided by Pinchin is intended for Client use only. Pinchin will not provide results or
information to any party unless disclosure by Pinchin is required by law. Any use by a third party of
reports or documents authored by Pinchin or any reliance by a third party on or decisions made by a third
party based on the findings described in said documents, is the sole responsibility of such third parties.
Pinchin accepts no responsibility for damages suffered by any third party as a result of decisions made or
actions conducted. No other warranties are implied or expressed.
6.0 REFERENCES
The following legislation and documents were referenced in completing the assessment and this report:
J:\111000s\111130 IDEALDEVELOPM,6housesON,DSUB,ASSMT\Sites\6532 and 6544 Winston Churchill\111130 Hazardous Building Materials Assessment, 6532 and 6544
Winston Churchill Blvd, Mississauga, ON.docx
Template: Master Report for Hazardous Materials Assessment Report (Pre-Construction), Haz, February 1, 2016
ASBESTOS-CONTAINING MATERIALS:
CLIENT:
LOCATION:
6532 WINSTON CHURCHILL BOULEVARD
MISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO
TITLE:
HAZARDOUS BUILDING
MATERIALS ASSESSMENT
BASEMENT
DATE: PROJECT # :
2016/04/25 111130
CK
CHECKED BY:
OK 1 OF 4
SCALE:
NTS
TEMPLATE SPACING
L004
PCB2-6532 LEGEND:
4
CLIENT:
IDEAL DEVELOPMENTS
LOCATION:
6532 WINSTON CHURCHILL BOULEVARD
MISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO
TITLE:
HAZARDOUS BUILDING
5 MATERIALS ASSESSMENT
GROUND FLOOR
DATE: PROJECT # :
2016/04/25 111130
CK
CHECKED BY:
OK 2 OF 4
SCALE:
NTS
TEMPLATE SPACING
LEGEND:
ASBESTOS-CONTAINING MATERIALS:
CLIENT:
IDEAL DEVELOPMENTS
A0002A
LOCATION:
6544 WINSTON CHURCHILL BOULEVARD
MISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO
TITLE:
HAZARDOUS BUILDING
MATERIALS ASSESSMENT
BASEMENT
DATE: PROJECT # :
2016/04/25 111130
CK
CHECKED BY:
OK 3 OF 4
SCALE:
NTS
TEMPLATE SPACING
PCB1-6544
A0005C A0004A
LEGEND:
A0004B
X PINCHIN LOCATION NUMBER
1 ASBESTOS BULK SAMPLE
LOCATION:
A0001C
6544 WINSTON CHURCHILL BOULEVARD
MISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO
TITLE:
HAZARDOUS BUILDING
5 MATERIALS ASSESSMENT
GROUND FLOOR
DATE: PROJECT # :
2016/04/25 111130
CK
L003
CHECKED BY:
OK 4 OF 4
SCALE:
NTS
TEMPLATE SPACING
APPENDIX II-A
Asbestos Analytical Certificates
Bulk Asbestos Analysis LAB #173190
Customer: Pinchin Ltd. Attn: Owen Kirby Lab Order ID: 1607216
2470 Milltower Court Mark Stroombergen Analysis ID: 1607216_PLM
Mississauga, ON L5N 7W5
Date Received: 4/13/2016
Project: Date Reported: 4/18/2016
Ideal developments, 6532 and 6544 Winston Churchill Boulevard, Mississauga, ON
1607216PLM_1
floor tile Ashed
1607216PLM_29
mastic Dissolved
1607216PLM_2
floor tile Ashed
1607216PLM_30
mastic Dissolved
1607216PLM_3
floor tile - ashed Ashed
1607216PLM_31
mastic Dissolved
1607216PLM_4
floor tile Dissolved
1607216PLM_32
mastic Dissolved
Disclaimer: Due to the nature of the EPA 600 method, asbestos may not be detected in samples containing low levels of asbestos. We strongly recommend that analysis of floor tiles, vermiculite, and/or
heterogeneous soil samples be conducted by TEM for confirmation of “None Detected” by PLM. This report relates only to the samples tested and may not be reproduced, except in full, without the written
approval of SAI. This report may not be used by the client to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any other agency of the U.S. government. Analytical uncertainty available upon request. Scientific
Analytical Institute participates in the NVLAP Proficiency Testing program. Unless otherwise noted blank sample correction was not performed. Estimated MDL is 0.1%.
Byron Stroble (44)
Customer: Pinchin Ltd. Attn: Owen Kirby Lab Order ID: 1607216
2470 Milltower Court Mark Stroombergen Analysis ID: 1607216_PLM
Mississauga, ON L5N 7W5
Date Received: 4/13/2016
Project: Date Reported: 4/18/2016
Ideal developments, 6532 and 6544 Winston Churchill Boulevard, Mississauga, ON
1607216PLM_33
mastic Dissolved
1607216PLM_34
mastic Dissolved
1607216PLM_7 Teased
White
White exterior caulking. 6544 Non Fibrous
A0004A 3% Chrysotile 97% Other Heterogeneous
1607216PLM_10 Dissolved
Disclaimer: Due to the nature of the EPA 600 method, asbestos may not be detected in samples containing low levels of asbestos. We strongly recommend that analysis of floor tiles, vermiculite, and/or
heterogeneous soil samples be conducted by TEM for confirmation of “None Detected” by PLM. This report relates only to the samples tested and may not be reproduced, except in full, without the written
approval of SAI. This report may not be used by the client to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any other agency of the U.S. government. Analytical uncertainty available upon request. Scientific
Analytical Institute participates in the NVLAP Proficiency Testing program. Unless otherwise noted blank sample correction was not performed. Estimated MDL is 0.1%.
Byron Stroble (44)
Customer: Pinchin Ltd. Attn: Owen Kirby Lab Order ID: 1607216
2470 Milltower Court Mark Stroombergen Analysis ID: 1607216_PLM
Mississauga, ON L5N 7W5
Date Received: 4/13/2016
Project: Date Reported: 4/18/2016
Ideal developments, 6532 and 6544 Winston Churchill Boulevard, Mississauga, ON
White
Plaster. Kitchen 6544 Non Fibrous
A0005A - A None Detected 100% Other Heterogeneous
1607216PLM_13
finish Teased
Beige
Plaster. Kitchen 6544 Non Fibrous
A0005A - B None Detected 100% Other Heterogeneous
1607216PLM_35
base Crushed
White
Plaster. Kitchen 6544 Non Fibrous
A0005B - A None Detected 100% Other Heterogeneous
1607216PLM_14
finish Teased
Beige
Plaster. Kitchen 6544 Non Fibrous
A0005B - B None Detected 100% Other Heterogeneous
1607216PLM_36
base Crushed
White
Plaster. Living Room. 6544 Non Fibrous
A0005C - A None Detected 100% Other Heterogeneous
1607216PLM_15
finish Teased
Beige
Plaster. Living Room. 6544 Non Fibrous
A0005C - B None Detected 100% Other Heterogeneous
1607216PLM_37
base Crushed
Disclaimer: Due to the nature of the EPA 600 method, asbestos may not be detected in samples containing low levels of asbestos. We strongly recommend that analysis of floor tiles, vermiculite, and/or
heterogeneous soil samples be conducted by TEM for confirmation of “None Detected” by PLM. This report relates only to the samples tested and may not be reproduced, except in full, without the written
approval of SAI. This report may not be used by the client to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any other agency of the U.S. government. Analytical uncertainty available upon request. Scientific
Analytical Institute participates in the NVLAP Proficiency Testing program. Unless otherwise noted blank sample correction was not performed. Estimated MDL is 0.1%.
Byron Stroble (44)
Customer: Pinchin Ltd. Attn: Owen Kirby Lab Order ID: 1607216
2470 Milltower Court Mark Stroombergen Analysis ID: 1607216_PLM
Mississauga, ON L5N 7W5
Date Received: 4/13/2016
Project: Date Reported: 4/18/2016
Ideal developments, 6532 and 6544 Winston Churchill Boulevard, Mississauga, ON
1607216PLM_16
finish Teased
1607216PLM_38
base Crushed
White
Plaster. Living Room. 6532 Non Fibrous
A0005E - A None Detected 100% Other Heterogeneous
1607216PLM_17
finish Teased
Beige
Plaster. Living Room. 6532 Non Fibrous
A0005E - B None Detected 100% Other Heterogeneous
1607216PLM_39
base Crushed
White
Plaster. Living Room. 6532 Non Fibrous
A0005F - A None Detected 100% Other Heterogeneous
1607216PLM_18
finish Teased
Beige
Plaster. Living Room. 6532 Non Fibrous
A0005F - B None Detected 100% Other Heterogeneous
1607216PLM_40
base Crushed
White
Plaster. Kitchen 6532 Non Fibrous
A0005G - A None Detected 100% Other Heterogeneous
1607216PLM_19
finish Teased
Beige
Plaster. Kitchen 6532 Non Fibrous
A0005G - B None Detected 100% Other Heterogeneous
1607216PLM_41
base Crushed
Disclaimer: Due to the nature of the EPA 600 method, asbestos may not be detected in samples containing low levels of asbestos. We strongly recommend that analysis of floor tiles, vermiculite, and/or
heterogeneous soil samples be conducted by TEM for confirmation of “None Detected” by PLM. This report relates only to the samples tested and may not be reproduced, except in full, without the written
approval of SAI. This report may not be used by the client to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any other agency of the U.S. government. Analytical uncertainty available upon request. Scientific
Analytical Institute participates in the NVLAP Proficiency Testing program. Unless otherwise noted blank sample correction was not performed. Estimated MDL is 0.1%.
Byron Stroble (44)
Customer: Pinchin Ltd. Attn: Owen Kirby Lab Order ID: 1607216
2470 Milltower Court Mark Stroombergen Analysis ID: 1607216_PLM
Mississauga, ON L5N 7W5
Date Received: 4/13/2016
Project: Date Reported: 4/18/2016
Ideal developments, 6532 and 6544 Winston Churchill Boulevard, Mississauga, ON
1607216PLM_20
floor tile Ashed
1607216PLM_42
mastic Dissolved
1607216PLM_21
floor tile Ashed
1607216PLM_43
mastic Dissolved
1607216PLM_22
floor tile - ashed Ashed
1607216PLM_44
mastic Dissolved
Beige
beige exterior caulking. 6532 Non Fibrous
A0007A 3% Chrysotile 97% Other Heterogeneous
1607216PLM_23 Dissolved
Disclaimer: Due to the nature of the EPA 600 method, asbestos may not be detected in samples containing low levels of asbestos. We strongly recommend that analysis of floor tiles, vermiculite, and/or
heterogeneous soil samples be conducted by TEM for confirmation of “None Detected” by PLM. This report relates only to the samples tested and may not be reproduced, except in full, without the written
approval of SAI. This report may not be used by the client to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any other agency of the U.S. government. Analytical uncertainty available upon request. Scientific
Analytical Institute participates in the NVLAP Proficiency Testing program. Unless otherwise noted blank sample correction was not performed. Estimated MDL is 0.1%.
Byron Stroble (44)
Customer: Pinchin Ltd. Attn: Owen Kirby Lab Order ID: 1607216
2470 Milltower Court Mark Stroombergen Analysis ID: 1607216_PLM
Mississauga, ON L5N 7W5
Date Received: 4/13/2016
Project: Date Reported: 4/18/2016
Ideal developments, 6532 and 6544 Winston Churchill Boulevard, Mississauga, ON
1607216PLM_26
unable to separate mastic Teased
Disclaimer: Due to the nature of the EPA 600 method, asbestos may not be detected in samples containing low levels of asbestos. We strongly recommend that analysis of floor tiles, vermiculite, and/or
heterogeneous soil samples be conducted by TEM for confirmation of “None Detected” by PLM. This report relates only to the samples tested and may not be reproduced, except in full, without the written
approval of SAI. This report may not be used by the client to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any other agency of the U.S. government. Analytical uncertainty available upon request. Scientific
Analytical Institute participates in the NVLAP Proficiency Testing program. Unless otherwise noted blank sample correction was not performed. Estimated MDL is 0.1%.
Byron Stroble (44)
- Stop Positive
,k,,"~l1i<~r IhfY W_ iqlfUde\" '
in (he efectronic dataIetuh1e~fo you
to facilitate
~ Nl)iilb'!f;"
• 4
:lD~".!l3!R!Ifl¥I ,._ UDiIjl.rjllt!!, 'il '!Ii! ~,JI ~21:iJfNU •• offll,ll ,j . \iiiii!lII
«
A0001A Vinyl floor tile 1 - 9"x9" Beig e, Washroom 6544
A0001B Vinyl floor tile 1 - 9"x9" Beig e, Washroom 6544
A0001C Vinyl floor tile 1 - 9"x9" Beig e. Washroom 6544
A0002A Vinyl floor tile 2 - 12"x1 2" pebble pattern . basement 6544
A00028 Vinyl floor tile 2 - 12"x12" pebble pattern . basement 6544
A0002C
A0003A
A00038
Vinyl floor tile 2 - 12"x12" pebble patte rn . basement 6532
Vinyl sheet floofing (VSF1) grey pattern . Kitchen 6544
Vinyl sheet flooring (VSF1 ) grey patte rn . Kitchen 6544
, Accepted Er
A0003C
A0004A
A00048
A0004C
Vinyl sheet flooring (VSF1 ) grey pattern . Kitchen 6544
White exterior caulking . 6544
White exterior caulking . 6544
White exterior caulking . 6544
Rejected o
. ~~
A0005A Plaster. Kitchen 6544
.i// 3
/rJJo lf
/&0702--1/0
A0006A Vinyl floor tile 3 - 12"x12" beige under VSF. Kitchen 6532
A0006B Vinyl floor tile 3 - 12"x12" beige under VSF, Kitchen 6544
A0006C Vinyl floor tite 3 - 12"x12" beige under VSF . Kitchen 6532
AOOOBA Vinyl sheet flooring (VS F2) white and green pattern. Kitchen 6532
AOOOBB Vinyl sheet fiooring (VSF2) white and green pattern. Kitchen 6532
AOOOBC Vinyl sheet flooring (VSF2) white and green pattern. Kitchen 6532
»
APPENDIX II-B
Lead Analytical Certificates
Analysis for Lead Concentration
in Paint Chips
by Flame Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy
EPA SW-846 3050B/6010C/7420
Customer: Pinchin Ltd. Attn: Owen Kirby Lab Order ID: 1607217
2470 Milltower Court Mark Stroombergen Analysis ID: 1607217_PBP
Mississauga, ON L5N 7W5
Date Received: 4/13/2016
Project: Designated Substances, Assessment at 6532 and 6544 winston churchill blvd, Date Reported: 4/19/2016
mississauga, ON
Unless otherwise noted blank sample correction was not performed on analytical results. Scientific Analytical Institute participates in the AIHA ELPAT program. ELPAT Laboratory ID: 173190. This report
relates only to the samples tested and may not be reproduced, except in full, without the written approval of SAI. Analytical uncertainty available upon request. The quality control samples run with the
samples in this report have passed all EPA required specifications unless otherwise noted. RL: (Report Limit for an undiluted 50ml sample is 4µg Total Pb).
P.O. #. 111130 Note: Data 1 and Data 2 are optional 4604 Dundas Dr.
Date Submitted: 4/12/20160:00 fields that do not show up on the official Greensboro, NC 27407
report, however they will be Included Phone: 336.292.3888
Analysis: Paint chips by flame AA in the electronic data returned to you Fax: 336.292.3313
TurnAroundTlme: Regular to facilitate your reintegration of the report data. Email: lab@sailab.com
ISample Number Data 1 (Lab use only) Sample Description Data 2 (Lab use onlY}---- -:1
«
L001 Green paint on wall . Bedroom 6544
L002 Cream on plaster wall. Hall 6544
L003 White paint- exterior. 6544
L004 White paint on trim-exterior. 6532
L005 Beige on wall . 6532
»
0J B
APPENDIX II-C
PCB Analytical Certificates
AEVITAS INC. (AYR)
ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY DEPARTMENT
75 WANLESS COURT, AYR, ONTARIO, N0B 1E0, CANADA
(AYR) WWW.AEVITAS.CA
Certificate of Analysis
Owen Kirby
Pinchin Environmental Ltd. (Mississauga) Printed: Apr 19, 2016
2470 Milltower Court, Mississauga, ON L5N 7W5
Report Description: 2 solid samples were submitted for the following chemical analysis
Project Name: Designated Substances Assessment Date Sampled: Apr 11, 2016
Project No.: 111130 Date Tested: Apr 19, 2016
Site Location: 6532 and 6544 Winston Churchill Blvd., Mississauga, ON Sampled by: Owen Kirby
Approved By:
The Analytical Chemistry Laboratory of Aevitas Inc. (Ayr) is accredited for specific tests in accordance with the recognised International Standard ISO/IEC 17025:2005 by the
Canadian Association for Laboratory Accreditation (CALA) Inc. This accreditation demonstrates technical competence for a defined scope and the operation of a laboratory quality
management system (refer to joint ISO-ILAC-IAF Communiqué dated 8 January 2009). The laboratory quality management system of Aevitas Inc. (Ayr) meets the principles of
ISO 9001:2008.
All Analytical data is subject to uncertainty which, may vary with sample matrices, sample preparation techniques and instrumental parameters. As a general guideline, uncertainty
may be expressed as approximately +/- 50% of the reported value at or near the Method Detection Limit (MDL) and +/-10% or less, of the reported result that is greater than 10
times the MDL. Method Detection Limits are defined as approximately 3 times the standard deviation value (at 99% confidence level), which is obtained from replicate analysis of
a low-level standard as per the Ontario MOE - MISA Protocol for the Sampling and Analysis of Industrial / Municipal Wastewater (1999). MDL determination is based on undiluted
samples with relatively low matrix interferences. Where dilutions are required, the reported MDL value will be scaled proportionally.
All testing procedures follow strict guidelines and quality assurance / quality control (QA/QC) protocols. QA/QC data is available for review at any time upon client's request.
1.0 GENERAL
Pinchin conducts a room-by-room survey (rooms, corridors, service areas, exterior, etc.) to identify the
hazardous building materials as defined by the scope of work. All work is conducted in accordance with
our own internal Standard Operating Procedures.
Information regarding the location and condition of hazardous building materials encountered and visually
estimated quantities are recorded. The locations of any samples collected are recorded on small-scale
plans.
• Articles belonging to the owner, tenant or occupant (e.g. stored items, furniture,
appliances, etc.);
• Materials not typically associated with construction (e.g. settled dust, spills, residual
contamination from prior spills, etc.).
The assessment includes limited demolition of wall and ceiling finishes (drywall or plaster) to view
concealed conditions at representative areas as permitted by the current building use. Limited destructive
testing of flooring is conducted where possible (under carpets or multiple layers of flooring). Demolition of
masonry walls (chases, shafts etc.), structural items or exterior building finishes is not conducted.
1.2 Asbestos
Pinchin conducts an inspection for the presence of friable and non-friable asbestos-containing materials
(ACM). A friable material is a material that when dry can be crumbled, pulverized or powdered by hand
pressure.
A separate set of samples is collected of each type of homogenous material suspected to contain
asbestos. A homogenous material is defined by the US EPA as material that is uniform in texture and
appearance, was installed at one time, and is unlikely to consist of more than one type or formulation of
material. The homogeneous materials are determined by visual examination and available information on
the phases of construction and prior renovations.
Pinchin collects samples at a rate that is in compliance with Table 1 of O.Reg. 278/05.
The sampling strategy is also based on known ban dates and phase out dates of the use of asbestos;
sampling of certain building materials is not conducted after specific construction dates. In addition, to be
conservative, several years past these dates are added to account for some uncertainty in the exact
start/finish date of construction and associated usage of ACM.
Pinchin conducts limited demolition of masonry block walls (core holes) to investigate for loose fill
insulation. The core holes are temporarily patched with expanding foam.
Flooring mastic/adhesive and leveling compounds are only sampled and analyzed if present on the
underside of flooring samples (vinyl floor tile and vinyl sheet flooring).
If present, the following materials are presumed to be asbestos-containing and are best sampled
immediately prior to commencing renovation/disturbance:
Pinchin submits the bulk samples to a NVLAP accredited laboratory for analysis. The analysis is
performed in accordance with Test Method EPA/600/R-93/116: Method for the Determination of Asbestos
in Bulk Building Materials, July 1993.
The asbestos analysis is completed using a stop positive approach. Only one result meeting the above
regulated criteria is required to determine that a material is asbestos-containing, but all samples must be
analyzed to conclusively determine that a material is non-asbestos. The laboratory stops analyzing
samples from a homogeneous material once a result equal to or greater than the regulated criteria is
detected in any of the samples of that material. All samples of a homogeneous material are analyzed if no
asbestos is detected. In some cases, all samples are analyzed in the sample set regardless of result.
Where building materials are described in the report as non-asbestos, this means that either no asbestos
was detected by the analytical method utilized in any of the multiple samples or, if detected, it is below the
lower limit of an asbestos-containing material in the applicable regulation.
Asbestos materials are evaluated in order to make recommendations regarding remedial work. The
priority for remedial action is based on several factors:
• Air movement or air erosion (present, not present). (BC and Alberta only)
• Efficiency of the work (for example, if damaged ACM is being removed in an area, it may
be most practical to remove all ACM in the area even if it is in good condition).
For a complete description of the Evaluation Criteria and Basis of Recommendations, refer to Annex A.
1.3 Lead
Pinchin collects samples of distinctive paint finishes and surface coatings present in more than a limited
application, where removal of the paint is possible. Pinchin collects samples by scraping the painted finish
to include base and covering applications. Drawings included show sample locations.
Analysis for lead in paints or surface coatings is performed at an accredited laboratory in accordance with
EPA Method No. 3050B/Method No. 7420; flame atomic absorption.
The Ontario Ministry of Labour (MOL) has not established a lower limit for concentrations of lead in paint,
below which precautions do not need to be considered during construction projects. Pinchin follows the
recommendations of the Environmental Abatement Council of Ontario (EACO) Lead Guideline for
Construction, Renovation, Maintenance or Repair. The Guideline suggests that 0.1% (1,000 ppm) lead in
paint represents a de minimus concentration of lead in paint for construction hygiene purposes, that is a
concentration below which the lead content is not the limiting hazard in any disturbance of leaded paint
for non-aggressive disturbance of painted finishes, (hand powered demolition, chipping, scraping, light
sanding, etc.). The use of aggressive methods such as power grinding, torching, welding, etc. may result
in significant lead exposures even with low concentrations of lead in paints (below 0.1%). Paint and
surface coatings are evaluated for condition such as flaking, chipping or spalling.
Other lead building products (e.g. batteries, lead sheeting, flashing) are identified by visual observation
only.
1.4 Silica
Pinchin identifies building materials suspected of containing crystalline silica (e.g. concrete, cement, tile,
brick, masonry, mortar) by knowledge of current and historic applications and visual inspection only.
Pinchin does not perform sampling of these materials for laboratory analysis of crystalline silica content.
1.5 Mercury
Pinchin determines the potential for light ballasts to contain PCBs based on the age of the building, a
review of maintenance records and examination of labels or nameplates on equipment, where present
and accessible. The information is compared to known ban dates of PCBs and Environment Canada
publications. Other than light ballasts and pole mounted transformers, all other liquid uses of PCBs
should have been discontinued.
Pinchin samples exterior caulking or sealants for PCBs based on the date of construction or installation.
Caulking installed after 1985 is presumed to be free of PCBs and hence not sampled. If sampled,
analysis for PCBs is performed using an ASTM test method appropriate to the sample matrix at an
accredited laboratory.
Pinchin identifies the presence of mould if visibly present in a significant quantity on exposed building
surfaces. If any mould growth is concealed within wall cavities it is not addressed in this assessment.
aster Template: Methodology Document for Hazardous Building Materials Pre-Construction, HAZ, March 28, 201
The detailed asbestos assessment provides information regarding the location, condition, accessibility
and friability of the asbestos-containing materials (ACM). In order to make recommendations for
compliance with current regulations, Pinchin developed the following criteria.
2.1 Friable Spray Applied Fireproofing, Insulation and Texture Finishes (Surfacing Materials)
To evaluate the condition of ACM sprayed or trowelled on fireproofing, sprayed or trowelled thermal
insulation (non-mechanical), or texture, decorative or acoustic finishes, the following criteria are applied:
In observation areas where damage exists in isolated locations, both good and poor condition may be
applicable. The extent or percentage of each condition will be recorded. Fair condition is not utilized in the
evaluation of ACM sprayed or trowelled fireproofing, sprayed or trowelled thermal insulation (non-
mechanical), or texture, decorative or acoustic finishes.
The evaluation of the above products above ceilings may be limited by the number of observations and
by building components such as ducts or full height walls that obstruct the above ceiling observations.
To evaluate the condition of mechanical insulation on vessels, boilers, breeching, ducts, pipes, fan units,
equipment etc. the following criteria are applied:
Fair Minor penetrating damage to jacketed insulation (cuts, tears, nicks, deterioration or
delamination) or undamaged insulation that has never been jacketed. Insulation is
exposed but not showing surface disintegration. The extent of missing insulation
ranges from minor to none. Damage can be repaired.
The evaluation of mechanical insulation may be limited by the number of observations made and building
components such as ducts or full height walls that obstruct observations. It is often not possible to
observe each foot of mechanical insulation from all angles.
Potentially friable ACM are products that are basically non-friable while in place, but have the potential to
generate friable dust upon removal or if significantly disturbed without appropriate procedures. These
products may become friable but may become friable if damaged. Potentially friable materials include
materials such as acoustic ceiling tiles and plaster. The use of the description Fair with regard to a
potentially friable ACM may reflect their physical condition and not their tendency to release fibres to the
air under normal use. To evaluate the condition of potentially friable materials, the following criteria are
applied:
Fair Showing signs of some cracking or breakage, but is not deteriorating (e.g. cracked
plaster, broken but in place ceiling tile, etc.). The condition is such that it is still
serving its intended use as a building material or finish but may require repair for
mainly cosmetic purposes.
Poor Significant deterioration or breaking apart of the material. Material has deteriorated
to the point it is not serving its intended use as building material or finish. Material
has deteriorated to a point it has become friable. Normally potentially friable ACM in
Poor condition is not repairable and requires at least localized removal and
replacement.
Non-friable ACM cover a wide range of products with a wide variation in their tendency to release dust or
asbestos fibres to the air. Many of these materials, (particularly where the matrix is an unweathered
bitumen, asphalt or tar material) do not release fibres except in very unusual circumstances or during
significant disturbance (e.g. use of abrasive power tools). Others with a cementitious matrix (asbestos-
cement products) can more readily release dust due to abrasion, demolition, weathering, etc. The
potential for asbestos release from non-friable ACM is always lower than from friable ACM. Therefore the
use of the descriptions Fair or Poor in regard to a non-friable ACM reflects only their physical condition
and not their tendency to release fibres to the air under normal use or when disturbed. To evaluate the
condition of non-friable Materials, the following criteria are applied:
Fair Showing signs of some cracking or damage but has not deteriorated. Such change
in condition may be repairable. The condition is such that it is still serving its intended
use as a building material or finish and does not require repair or removal from an
asbestos hazard perspective.
Poor Significant deterioration or breaking apart of the material to the point at which it
cannot be repaired and it will require at least local removal. Material has deteriorated
to the point it is not serving its intended use as building material or finish. Material
may have deteriorated to a point where traffic or disturbance may cause it to become
friable. Non-friable ACM in poor condition may, but does not necessarily, indicate
the material is friable, or pose a risk of fibre release if disturbed.
The identification of the exact location or presence of debris on the top of ceiling tiles is limited by the
number of observations made and the presence of building components such as ducts or full height walls
that obstruct observations.
The presence of fallen or dislodged ACM is noted separately from the ACM source and is referred to as
Debris. Debris may be friable if from a friable ACM source or a badly deteriorated non-friable ACM
source. Debris may also be non-friable (such as fallen pieces of transite sheet or mastic fittings, or
broken, dislodged floor tiles).
Presumed asbestos-containing materials (PACM), are building materials that may contain asbestos but
were not sampled or analyzed due to inaccessibility or the need to perform destructive testing to obtain a
reasonable sample set. Evaluation of these materials is based on the assumption that these PACM are
asbestos-containing.
A list of PACM is provided in the report and they are generally not included in the detailed room by room
reports. Typically they are excluded because they are inaccessible or present in very small quantities. If
PACM are evaluated, Pinchin uses the criteria that correspond with the type (and friability) of the material
listed above.
Master Template: Methodology Document for Hazardous Building Materials Pre-Construction, HAZ, March 28, 2016