Professional Documents
Culture Documents
California Bearing Ratio Test: (As Per IS 2720 (Part-16) )
California Bearing Ratio Test: (As Per IS 2720 (Part-16) )
California Bearing Ratio Test: (As Per IS 2720 (Part-16) )
0+000 (Wardha) to Km. 53+708 (Arvi) NH-647 in the State of Maharastra On Engineering Procurment & Construction
(EPC)Basic Contract.
Format No.:T/F 7 Rev no: 0
Client National Highways Public Work Department Of Maharashtra
Contractor RPP Infra Project's Ltd
Authority Engineer TPF ENGINEERING PVT LTD
CALIFORNIA BEARING RATIO TEST
[As per IS 2720(Part-16)]
Laboratory job no. Date of Sampling 2/27/2019
Type of material Soil Date of Casting 3/6/2019
Source/Location OGL - 26+500 Date of Testing 3/10/2019
MDD of Sample (gm/cc) 1.695 Sampled by Jointly
OMC of Sample (%) 15.5 Tested by Jointly
Proposed use Emb.Bottom
MOISTURE CONTENT AND UNIT WEIGHT OF TEST SAMPLES
S.No Description Mould No. 13 Mould No. 14 Mould No. 15
A. No.Of layers 5 5 5
B. No.Of blows per layer 56 56 56
C. Condition of sample while SOAKING Before After Before After Before After
D. Wt.of mould(gm) 6960 6482 6408
E. Wt.of wet sample+mould(gm) 11263 11337 10832 10883 10732 10772
F. Wt.of wet sample(E-D)(gm) 4303 4377 4350 4401 4324 4364
G. Volume of mould/sample (cc) 2250 2250 2250 2250 2250 2250
H. Wet density (F/G)(gm/cc) 1.912 1.945 1.933 1.956 1.922 1.940
J. Moisture determination
K. Container no. 21 23 22 27 26 25
L. Wt.of container(gm) 35.62 35.4 34.9 35.19 34.23 34.95
M. Wt.of wet sample+cont.(gm) 93.12 95.02 93.71 91.98 89.2 92.16
N. Wt.of dry sample+cont.(gm) 85.61 86.51 85.98 84.03 81.93 84.26
P. Wt.of water(M-N)(gm) 7.51 8.51 7.73 7.95 7.27 7.9
Q. Wt.of dry sample(N-L)(gm) 49.99 51.11 51.08 48.84 47.7 49.31
R. Water content[(P/Q)x100](%) 15.02 16.65 15.13 16.28 15.24 16.02
S. Dry density{H/[1+(R/100)]}(gm/cc) 1.663 1.668 1.679 1.682 1.668 1.672
LOAD PENETRATION TEST DATA
Penetratio Proving ring Proving ring Proving ring
GENERAL INFORMATION
n (mm) reading
Load(kgf)
reading
Load(kgf)
reading
Load(kgf)
0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Type of compaction used: Static/ Dynamic
0.5 2 12.94 4 25.88 3 19.41
1.0 4 25.88 6 38.82 5 32.35
Period of soaking : 04 days
1.5 5 32.35 8 51.76 6 38.82
2.0 6 38.82 9 58.23 7 45.29
Wt.of surcharge used (kg) : 5kg
2.5 7 45.29 10 64.7 8 51.76
4.0 9 58.23 13 84.11 10 64.7
Proving ring Number & capacity : 50KN
5.0 10 64.7 14 90.58 11 71.17
7.5 12 77.64 16 103.52 13 84.11
Proving Ring Load Factor 6.47
10.0
12.5
Corrected unit load from graph(kg) for 2.5mm 3.31 4.72 3.78
Corrected unit load from graph(kg) for 5.0mm 3.15 4.41 3.46
CBR at 2.5mm (%) 3.31 4.72 3.78
CBR at 5.0mm (%) 3.15 4.41 3.46
CBR reported (%) 3.94
LOAD vsLOAD
PENETRATION GRAPH
vs PENETRATION (56 Blows)
GRAPH
100
400
90
350
80
300
70
250
60
(Kg)
Load(Kg)
50
200
Load
40
150
30
100
20
50
10
00
12.5
13.0
14.5
0.5
1.0
2.0
2.5
3.5
4.0
5.0
5.5
6.5
7.0
8.0
8.5
9.5
10.0
10.5
11.0
11.5
12.0
13.5
14.0
15.0
0.0
1.5
3.0
4.5
6.0
7.5
9.0
0.5
1.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
5.0
5.5
6.0
7.5
9.0
9.5
10.0
12.5
0.0
1.5
2.0
4.0
4.5
6.5
7.0
8.0
8.5
10.5
11.0
11.5
12.0
13.0
13.5
14.0
14.5
15.0
Penetration
Penetration(mm)
(mm)
Results:-
Mould no. 13
CBR at 2.5mm Penetration
CBR at 5.0mm Penetration
Corrected CBR at 2.5mm Penetration
Corrected CBR at 5.0mm Penetration
CBR reported as (%)=
140
120
100
80
Load (Kg)
60
40
20
0
0.5
1.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
5.0
5.5
6.0
7.5
9.0
9.5
10.0
12.5
0.0
1.5
2.0
4.0
4.5
6.5
7.0
8.0
8.5
10.5
11.0
11.5
12.0
13.0
13.5
14.0
14.5
15.0
Penetration (mm)
Results:-
Mould no. 14
CBR at 2.5mm Penetration
CBR at 5.0mm Penetration
Corrected CBR at 2.5mm Penetration
Corrected CBR at 5.0mm Penetration
CBR reported as (%)=
90
80
70
60
Load (Kg)
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.5
1.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
5.0
5.5
6.0
7.5
9.0
9.5
10.0
12.5
0.0
1.5
2.0
4.0
4.5
6.5
7.0
8.0
8.5
10.5
11.0
11.5
12.0
13.0
13.5
14.0
14.5
15.0
Penetration (mm)
Results:-
Mould no. 15
CBR at 2.5mm Penetration
CBR at 5.0mm Penetration
Corrected CBR at 2.5mm Penetration
Corrected CBR at 5.0mm Penetration
CBR reported as (%)=
10
CBR (%)
0
1.80 1.85 1.90 1.95