Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Handout 4.3 Laminar WithoutNotes
Handout 4.3 Laminar WithoutNotes
=
D
= / L
• : Average axial velocity at any cross-section
• = = 100
• < 2300 Laminar flow
Pre-Analysis
1. Mathematical model
2. Numerical solution procedure
3. Hand-calculations of expected results/trends
1
Mathematical Model: Axisymmetric
Assumption
• Use cylindrical co- r
ordinates , θ,
z
• = ,
• =v ̂ +v ̂ +v ̂ y
• = (r, z)
• = , x
z (x in
L
FLUENT)
Axis of symmetry
• 0≤ ≤
• 0≤ ≤
• 0≤ ≤2
2
Mathematical Model: Governing
Equations in Vector Form
1. Conservation of mass (continuity eq.)
⋅ =0
2. Conservation of momentum ( ⃗ = ⃗)
( ⋅ ) =− +
Assumptions:
= ̂ + ̂ • Axisymmetric
• Steady
Unknowns: • Incompressible
, , , , ( , ) • Laminar
1
+ =− + − +
1
+ =− + − +
3
Mathematical Model: Boundary
Conditions
r
= =0
=1 / =1
=0
z
= = = 0
=0
4
Discretization and Linearization
5
Hand Calculations: Expected Trends
Inviscid Core Boundary Layer Fully developed region:
Analytical solution
Parabolic profile
Le
Fully Developed Flow
Developing Flow
Entrance length:
≈ 0.06
+ =
1
− + − +
1
+ =− + − +
6
Fully-Developed Region: Analytical
Solution
• Parabolic velocity profile:
=2 1 −
7
Drag Coefficient Monitor
• FLUENT finds the net force
acting on the pipe wall by
integrating the pressure and
shear forces on the surface
• Drag is component of this force
vector in the axial direction
• Drag coefficient in our case is
• =
. ( )
8
Verification Steps
1. Sanity checks
2. Does the CFD solution honor the boundary conditions in the
mathematical model?
3. Does the CFD solution honor the physical principles in the
mathematical model?
– Check mass and momentum conservation in the domain
4. Is the linearization error acceptable?
5. Is the discretization error acceptable?
– Perform mesh refinement studies
6. Does the CFD solution match the analytical solution in fully-
developed region?