1
Modern Concept of the Rule of Law: A
Comparative approach
Shah Mohammad Omer Faruqe Jubaer1
Abstract: The rule of law is nearly
generally bolstered at the national and
universal level. The exceptional bolster for
the rule of law in hypothesis, in any case, is
conceivable as it were since of broadly
dissimilar sees of what it implies in practice.
Different national conventions postured few
issues whereas working in parallel, but
endeavors to advance the rule of law
through universal organizations have
required a reassessment of this pluralism.
This article proposes a center definition of
the rule of law as a political perfect and
contends that its pertinence to the universal
level will depend on that perfect being seen
as a implies instead of a conclusion, as
serving a work instead of characterizing a
status. Such a vision of the rule of law more
precisely reflects the advancement of the
rule of law in national wards and fittingly
highlights the political work that must be
done on the off chance that control is to be
channeled through law.
Keywords: the rule of law, approach of
ROL, Components of ROL, Modern view of
the Rule of Law.
The purpose and approach of the Rule of
Law:
The concept of “Rule of Law” is the
building square on which the advanced
majority rule society is established. For the
fruitful working of the commonwealth, it is
basic that there’s a requirement of law and
1
http://shahjubaer.com/ https://orcid.org/0000-
0002-5230-2030
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5230-2030
all contracts based on law. Laws are made
for the welfare of the individuals to preserve
concordance between the clashing powers in
society. One of the prime objects of making
laws is to preserve law and arrange in
society and create. A serene environment for
the advance of the individuals. The concept
of rule of Law plays an imperative part in
this process. The term “Rule of Law” is
determined from the French state ‘La
Principe de Legality’ (the guideline of
lawfulness) which alludes to a government
based on standards of law and not of men. In
a broader sense rule of Law implies that
Law is preeminent and is over each person.
No person whether in case he is wealthy,
destitute, rulers or ruled, etc are over the law
and they ought to comply it. The rule of law
has been described as a “rare and protean
principle of our political tradition”.2
The rule of law centrally comprises “the
values of normality and restriction,
epitomized within the trademark of “‘a
government of laws, not men’”. The term
rule of Law does not give anything almost
how the laws are to be made, or anything
particular just like the Crucial Rights or the
Order standards or equality, etc. but it gives
for two essential concepts that's Law must
be complied by the individuals which the
law must be made in such a way that it can
direct the conduct of its subjects. The
concept of rule of Law is that the state is
represented, not by the ruler or the
designated agents of the individuals but by
the law. • The expression 'Rule of Law' has
been inferred from the French express 'la
guideline de legality', i.e. a Government
based on the standards of law. rule of law,
the instrument, handle, institution, hone, or
2
Stromseth, J., Wippman, D., & Brooks, R. (2006).
Can Might make Rights?: building the rule of law
after military interventions. Cambridge University
Press.

standard that underpins the uniformity of all
citizens sometime recently the law, secures a
non-arbitrary shape of government, and
more by and large anticipates the subjective
utilize.
Meaning of the Rule of Law:
The term „Rule of Law‟ is taken from
Britain. It implies that no man is over the
law which each individual is subject to the
purview of conventional courts of law,
independent of his rank and position. Rule
of Law “requires that no individual ought to
be subjected to unforgiving, uncivilized or
subjective treatment. rule of law is related to
the word „law‟ which suggests that man or
society must not govern by a man or ruler
but instead of they must be administered by
Law. Rules cruel law rules. Since there's no
physical presence of law so law implies
government based on the guideline. It
implies all the acts of government ought to
be sensible and concurring to law. Concept
of the rule of Law: The concept of “Rule of
Law” is the building square on which the
advanced democratic society is established.
For the effective working of the
commonwealth, it is basic that there's the
requirement of law and of all contracts
based on law. Laws are made for the welfare
of the individuals to preserve agreement
between the conflicts, the concept of Rule of
Law plays an important role in this process.
The term “Rule of Law” is inferred from the
French state ‘La Principe de Legality’ (the
guideline of legitimateness) which alludes to
a government based on standards of law and
not of men. In a broader sense rule of Law
implies that Law is incomparable and is over
each person. No person whether on the off
chance that he is wealthy, destitute, rulers or
ruled, etc are over the law and they ought to
comply with it. In a smaller sense, the rule
of law suggests that government specialists
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5230-2030
2
may as it was being worked out in
understanding with the composed laws,
which were embraced through a setup
strategy. The guideline of rule of Law is
planning to defend against the self-assertive
activities of the government specialists. The
rule of law has been portrayed as a “rare and
changeable guideline of our political
tradition”.3 The rule of law centrally
comprises “the values of normality and
limitation, epitomized within the motto of “a
government of laws, not men’”. The term
Rule of Law has been utilized in legitimate
science and German legislative issues of the
past century to assign a particular
relationship between the political frame
State and the Law, a relationship that goes
past a constrained government that
encompasses its performance within the
pretense of lawful norms. The State device
(government and organization) is displayed
with the face of the control of amazingness
that employments state activity against
citizens. At this point the principle of
lawfulness rather than a unique translation
of Rule of Law represents the pivot of the
unused state with the partition of powers,
overall the subordination to the law of
authoritative activity (within the formal
sense: administrative allotment of control,
and equipment: possible inside constraining
modes and implies of work out),4 and a
symbol of abuse, subordinate to any other,
the common intrigued, something else
constitutively prefigured and decided by the
law. Therefore, taking after the approach
once in the past depicted, the Rule of Law
shows up.
3
Stromseth, J., Wippman, D., & Brooks, R. (2006).
Can Might Make Rights?: building the rule of law
after military interventions. Cambridge University
Press.
4
Costa, P., & Zolo, D. (Eds.). (2007). The rule of law.
Springer Science+ Business Media BV.

Characteristics of the Rule of Law:
Rule of Law is a dynamic concept but it is
somewhat difficult to define. Each
individual has its claim way of
characterizing rule of law a few think it to
be the amazingness of law; a few think it to
be the standards like clarity, all-
inclusiveness, solidness, etc. Due to all these
reasons certain fixings of rule of Law have
been distinguished and all which ought to
exist for the concept of rule of Law to
survive. We regularly come over to the state
‘the Rule of law’ these days. The rule of law
is the legitimate guideline that law oversees
a country, as restricted to being administered
by self-assertive choices of individuals who
use power. Those with control must
themselves be compelled by laws in working
out their powers and not act concurring to
their impulses and fancies.
Common ingredients of Rule of Law are:
a. government bound by and ruled by law
b. equality before the law
c. the establishment of law and order;
d. the efficient and predictable application
of justice; and
e. the protection of human rights
There are a few vital characteristics of the
rule of law. One characteristic is that no
individual may be rebuffed or made to
endure unless the individual has committed
a particular breach of the law. This
characteristic of the rule of law is related to
another lawful guideline; that the person
certified to have committed that offense
must be charged and the charge must be
illustrated by an independent tribunal, such
as a court, sometime as of late the person
can be rebuked. Another basic characteristic
of the run the appearance of law is that each
person is breaking indeed with a few time
recently the law. Balance a few times as of
late the law infers that the law must not be
based on the course of the person. It as well
suggests that each person must be entitled to
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5230-2030
3
rise to the affirmation of the law. In show
disdain toward of the truth that the run the
appeal of law was progressed by English
lawful consultant A.V. Questionable, the
characteristics of the run the appeal of law
has been known a few time as of late
Uncertain. The run the appearance of law is
broad. It is parcel and apportions of most
legal systems inside the world. It is a critical
bedrock of present-day popular
governments. At domestic, the rule of law is
implanted in our claim legitimate system by
the arrangements of the Structure. For
example, US Constitution provides that no
person shall be deprived of his life or
personal liberty save following law. Article
8(1) meanwhile provides that all persons are
equal before the law and entitled to the equal
protection of the law. The Rule of Law’,
identified several other important aspects of
the rule of law including the accessibility of
the law, the right to a fair trial, and the
adherence to human rights principles.
History and importance of the Rule of
Law:
The Rule of Law has been an imperative
perfect in our political convention for
centuries, and it is incomprehensible to get a
handle on and assess advanced
understandings of it without understanding
that authentic legacy. The legacy of
contention almost the Rule of Law starts
with Aristotle (c. 350 BC); it continues with
medieval scholars like Sir John Fortescue
(1471), who looked for to recognize legal
from dictatorial shapes of sovereignty; it
goes on through the early present-day period
within the work of John Locke (1689),
James Harrington (1656), and (strangely
enough) Niccolò Machiavelli (1517); within
the European Illumination within the
compositions of Montesquieu (1748) and
others; in American constitutionalism within

The Federalist Papers and (and indeed more
forcefully) within the works of the
Federalists’ rivals; and, within the cutting
edge period, in Britain within the works of
A. V. Sketchy (1885), F.A. Hayek (1944,
1960, and 1973), Michael Oakeshott (1983),
Joseph Raz (1977), and John Finnis (1980),
and America within the works of Lon Fulle
(1964), Ronald Dworkin (1985), and John
Rawls (1971). Because the heritage of this
idea is so much a part of its modern
application, a few highlights need to be
mentioned.
These reflections on the rule of law consider
the Rule of law from inside the rule of law
tradition. This dialog clarifies:
(1) What the rule of law is;
(2) What the rule of law requires of us;
(3) Where the rule of law comes from;
(4) Why it is so benificiary; and
(5) How able to secure it.
Let there be no disarray around the subject
matter of this request. The Rule of law in its
unique, best, and most valuable sense means
the "imperium legum" of the people of yore,
"the domain of laws and not of men" sought
after by the early humanists, by the partisans
of liberal Enlightenment, and republican
transformations over the globe. This can be
not the afterward, positivist, more restricted
understanding of the Rule of law as
"Rechtsstaat," which has sapped the Rule of
law all over and caused so much perplexity.
The rule of law in its original and most
natural sense is pure social good, in which
the legalism of the Rechtsstaat plays only a
partial and supporting role. Societies that
enjoy the rule of law are vastly better
situated than those that do not. This makes
the real rule of law (or its absence) the
central measure dividing good from bad
government everywhere. All law and
political institutions can and should be
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5230-2030
4
evaluated to determine whether it or they
advance the rule of law or do not.
DICEY’S theory of Rule of Law consists of
three main principles: Three principles
proposed by A.V. Dicey
1. Absence of Self-assertive Control or
Supremacy of Law: As per Uncertain rule of
law implies the supreme matchless quality
of law and ‘no man is culpable or can
legally be made to endure in body or
products but for an unmistakable breach of
law built up within the standard lawful way
sometime recently the courts of the arrive.
Dicey was of the see that all individuals
whether if they could be a common man or
government specialist are bound to comply
with the law. He is of the see that no man
can be rebuffed for anything else than a
breach of the law which is as of now set up.
Conjointly that the affirmed offense is
required to be demonstrated sometime
recently the conventional courts in
agreement with the ordinary strategy.
2. Equality before Law: As per Dicey Rule
of law, within the moment rule, implies the
balance of law or break even with the
subjection of all classes of individuals to the
standard law of the arrive which is managed
by the conventional law courts. In this sense
rule of law passes on that no man is over the
law. Indeed the Government Authorities are
beneath an obligation to comply with the
same law and there can be no other
uncommon courts for managing particularly
with their matters.
3. Structure is the result of the standard law
of the arrival: As per Dicey, in numerous
nations rights such as the right to individual
freedom, opportunity, capture, etc. are given
by the composed Structure of a Nation. But
in Britain, these rights are a result of the
legal choices that have emerged due to the
struggle between the parties. The structure
isn't the source but the result of the rights of

the individuals. But this principle of Dicey is
not applicable in India as in India we
consider the Constitution to be the basic
ground work of laws from which all other
laws are derived.
Uncertain clarified the concept of the Rule
of Law in 1885. Numerous changes have
taken put since then. So, it is impassive
shapes due to the taking after conditions: 1.
Certain benefits are allowed to the
authorities within the UK through
sanctioning the Open Specialists Security
Act. 2. With the improvement of the
Welfare State concept, the part of the state
had extended. It gave control of arbitration
to the authoritative offices, who some of the
time choose cases. 3. In a crisis, Principal
rights are suspended by the executive.
Rule of Law in Modern Sense:
Today Diecy’s theory of rule of law cannot
be accepted in its totality. The modern
concept of the rule of law is fairly wide and
therefore sets up an ideal for any
government to achieve. This concept was
developed by the International Commission
of Jurists. Known as Delhi Declaration,
1959 which was later on confirmed at logos
in 1961. According to this formulation-
“The rule of law implies that the functions
of the government in a free society should
be so exercised as to create conditions in
which the dignity of man as an individual is
upheld. This dignity requires not only the
recognition of certain civil or political rights
but also the creation of certain political,
social, economic, educational and cultural
conditions which are essential to the full
development of his personality”. According
to Davis, there are seven principal meanings
of the term “Rule of law:
(1) law and order;
(2) fixed rules;
(3) elimination of discretion;
(4) due process of law or fairness;
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5230-2030
5
(5) natural law or observance of the
principles of natural justice; (6) preference
for judges and ordinary courts of law to
executive authorities and administrative
tribunals; and (7) Judicial review of
administrative actions. So finally it may
correctly be said that rule of law does not
mean and cannot mean any government
under any law. It means the rule by a
democratic law-a law which is passed in a
democratically elected parliament after
adequate debate Dicey's Rule of Law
Dicey's view and proposition of rule of law
has succeeded in part and wasn’t sustainable
on other. Most of the modern legal system
implements the principles of judicial review
and similar principles of proportionality and
legitimate expectations. Dicey's views on
written and unwritten constitutions are
subject to much debate and discussion. And
discussion it is, subsequently, fundamental
to conversation approximately the subject of
the commitment to enforce the laws we
allude to as a few contemplations of
verifiable character on the beginning and the
matchless quality of law and, thus, whether
it is right to utilize them to administer. Plato
stated that the «government of laws» was
displayed as perfect,5 in differentiate to the
«government of men with its discretion and
mishandle. Such laws would not be anything
other than those managed by reason.
Aristotle, in his work «Politics», talked of
the laws and standards from human thinking
and relates them to the diverse shapes of
government characterized along the diverse
sorts of conceivable Constitutions.
Meanwhile, the rationalists known as stolid
expressly proposed that laws had no other
precedent than a legally binding course of
action among the men who at that point
comply; whereas the so-called sophists had
5
Carothers, T. (1998). The rule of law revival. Foreign
Aff., 77, 95.

recommended at the time that all political
truth, counting of course the laws, developed
from a talk whose extreme objective was to
get the
the rule of Law has been defined as “a body
of rules of action or conduct prescribed by a
controlling authority, and having binding
legal force. That which must be obeyed and
followed by citizens subject to sanctions or
legal consequence is a law.”
Although intended to protect the
fundamental rights and liberties of U.S.
citizens, the legal system and its laws are not
always readily understood by the average
citizen.6 At what point do we cross that fine
line between legal and illegal, and on what
basis is that line even drawn in the first
place?7 Most people understand (and accept)
laws prohibiting acts of murder, thievery,
physical harm, and financial malfeasance,
but there are plenty of other laws that might
give us pause. For example, in Minnesota,
any game in which participants attempt to
capture a greased or oiled pig is illegal. The
same laws also prohibits turkey scrambles.8
Don’t attempt to substitute a ferret for a
hunting dog in West Virginia. Anyone who
hunts, catches, takes, kills, injures, or
pursues a wild animal or bird with a ferret
will face a fine of no less than $100 (but no
more than $500) and no fewer than 10 (but
no more than 100) days in jail. While you
may never have considered taking part in a
turkey scramble or hunting with a ferret,
chances are good that you have broken some
law at some time perhaps even in the last
twenty-four hours. Did you exceed a speed
6
Ingram, P. (1985). Maintaining The Rule of Law. The
Philosophical Quarterly (1950-), 35(141), 359-381.
7
Schauer, F. (1991). Rules and the Rule of Law. Harv.
JL & Pub. Pol'y, 14, 645.
8 9
Endicott, T. (1999). The Impossibility of the Rule of
Law. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 19(1), 1-18.
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5230-2030
6
limit while driving? Roll through a stop sign
at an empty intersection while riding your
bike? Drive to the minimart without wearing
your seatbelt? Although unlikely that you
will be prosecuted and jailed for these minor
traffic offenses, the fact is that you broke the
law. Why do we have so many laws? Let’s
take a closer look at the role of law in
society and why laws are created in the first
place.
The Purposes of the rule of Law in
modern perception:
In a society such as the Joined together
States, the law educates existence in a wide
assortment of ways and is reflected in
various branches of law. For illustration,
contract law controls understandings to trade
products, administrations, or anything else
of esteem, so it incorporates everything from
buying a transport ticket to exchanging
alternatives on a subsidiaries advertise.
Property law characterizes people’s rights
and obligations toward substantial property,
counting genuine domain (i.e., genuine
property, such as arrive or buildings,) and
their other belonging (i.e., individual
property, such as dress, books, vehicles, and
so forward), and intangible property, such as
bank accounts and offers of stock. Tort law
gives for remuneration when somebody or
their property is hurt, whether in an vehicle
mischance or by maligning of character.
Those are fields of civil law, which deals
with disputes between individuals. Offenses
against a federal, state, or local community
itself are the subject of criminal law, which
provides for the government to punish the
offender.9 The law serves many purposes.
Four principal ones are establishing
standards, maintaining order, resolving
disputes, and protecting liberties and rights.
Ingram, P. (1985). Maintaining The Rule of Law. The
Philosophical Quarterly (1950-), 35(141), 359-381.

Setting up Measures: The law may be a
guidepost for negligibly satisfactory
behavior in society. A few exercises, for
occurrence, are wrongdoings since society
(through a administrative body) has decided
that it'll not endure certain behaviors that
harm or harm people or their property. For
case, beneath a normal state law, it may be a
wrongdoing to cause physical harm to
another individual without justification
doing so for the most part constitutes the
wrongdoing of assault.
Maintaining Arrange: This is a branch of
building up benchmarks. A few similarity of
arrange is vital in gracious society and is
subsequently reflected in law. The law when
implemented gives arrange reliable with
society’s rules.10 Natural life administration
laws, for case, (such as West Virginia’s
forbiddance against utilizing ferrets for
chasing,) were to begin with passed in an
exertion to preserve amusement that had
about been chased into termination amid the
nineteenth century. Such laws reflect the
value society places on protecting wildlife
for future generations to enjoy.
Settling Debate: Disputes are unavoidable in
a society comprised of people with
distinctive needs, needs, values, and sees.
The law gives a formal implies for settling
debate the court system.
Protecting Freedoms and Rights: The
constitutions and statutes of the Joined
together States and its states give for
different freedoms and rights. One work of
the law is to secure these different freedoms
and rights from infringement or
preposterous interruptions by people,
10
Skaaning, S. (2010). Measuring the Rule of Law.
Political Research Quarterly, 63(2), 449-460.
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5230-2030
7
organizations, or government. For case,
subject to certain special cases, the Primary
Alteration to the Structure denies the
government from making a law that denies
the flexibility of discourse. Somebody who
accepts that his free discourse rights have
been denied by the government may seek
after a cure by bringing a case within the
courts.
Components of Rule of Law: Rule of Law
is a dynamic concept but it is somewhat
difficult to define. Every person has its own
way of defining rule of law some think it to
be the supremacy of law; some think it to be
the principles like clarity,11 universality,
stability etc. Due to all these reasons certain
ingredients of Rule of Law have been
identified and all which need to exsist for
the concept of Rule of Law to survive.12
Locke’s political thoughts offer two
particular highlights of the concept of rule of
Law. On the one hand, it is accepted that the
law radiates from the will of the citizens and
points to ensure the work out of their crucial
flexibilities and rights. On the other hand,13
there's the definition of government as an
operator of citizens whose power is
restricted by the conditions that constitute its
root, that's to say, by the natural rights of
people. It is vital, at this point, that the rule
of Law is as it were genuine in case it is
bolstered by acts of free choices of citizens.
Consequently, the law needs authenticity in
the event that it isn't backed by the choice
12
Bleiker, C., & Krupanski, M. (2012). THE RULE OF
LAW. In The Rule of Law and Security Sector Reform:
Conceptualising a Complex Relationship (pp. 20-36).
London: Ubiquity Press.
13
Schachter, O. (1989). Self-Defense and the Rule of
Law. The American Journal of International Law,
83(2), 259-277.

and reconnaissance of citizens.14 The
unimportant regard for the law as it were
states a «relation of the domain» of operator
A over specialist B; what Locke’s tenet
includes is the basis for that space. With this
interpretation, he built up a political
teaching called radicalism,
Common ingredients of Rule of Law are:
1. a government bound by and ruled by
law
2. equality before the law
3. the establishment of law and order;
4. the efficient and predictable
application of justice; and
5. The protection of human rights.
But, centered on the inseparable ideas of
person rights and restricted government.
Hence, the supreme figure of a tyrannical
government seem force suitable laws that it
regarded to be delegitimized on all subjects,
and, instep the authenticity of government
and laws as an expression of the citizens
openly related were defended.15 The
existence of normal human rights whose
security is the as it were true blue work of
government, but at that point limit the
quality of citizens as it were to property
proprietors, dispenses with the possibility of
political interest and hence works out their
essential concept of most human rights of
the populace. Be that as it may, the idea of
law had been hypothesized in a key that will
never be deserted: his equity connected to
open choices and to certain fundamental
human rights. The Western Liberal State. So
at that point, the concept of Rule of Law
could be a reaction to the absolutist state,
characterized by the nonattendance of
14
Murphy, C. (2005). Lon Fuller and the Moral Value
of the Rule of Law. Law and Philosophy, 24(3), 239-
262.
15
Zywicki, T. (2003). The Rule of Law, Freedom, and
Prosperity. Supreme Court Economic Review, 10, 1-
26.
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5230-2030
8
opportunities, the concentration of control,
and the untrustworthiness of the holders of
the organs of power. Subsequently the
legitimate ensure of the Rule of Law
pertinent to cutting edge constitutionalism.
Amid the twentieth century, the Rule of Law
was built up as a counterpoint to
totalitarianism.16 Totalitarianism was
characterized by the concealment of person
and open freedoms, including the banning of
parties, deliberative bodies, and flexibility of
travel, get together, and expression. In any
case, totalitarianism looked for to legitimize
through legal instruments.17 The concept of
Rule of Law isn't bolstered by Kelsen, for
whom there's an identity of the state arrange
and the lawful arrange.
Conclusion: arrangement or framework of
an organization is basic to bring together
knowledge (information) and lawful
information in specific. Subsequently, a
framework for organizing this legitimate
information can be created from instruments
such as rules. This contributes to the
information in this range and guarantees that
it does not stay discrete and inaccessible.
This implies that within the legal field, it is
additionally conceivable to talk of an
efficient and successful instrument for
signaling the arrange (rule of Law). This sort
of mechanism permits a legitimate
organizational framework and accomplishes
targets. If it is replaced violently and/or
nonsensically; there would be an issue with
the information. Typically absolutely the
kind of issue that stems from intemperate
control of individuals’ actions (allocation of
rights) and is communicated within the
16
Nardin, T. (2008). Theorising the International Rule
of Law. Review of International Studies, 34(3), 385-
401.
17
Morrow, G. (1941). Plato and the Rule of Law. The
Philosophical Review, 50(2), 105-126.
 9

foundation of a closed system of lawful coordinates character that in its quintessence

arranging by the government (Delicate rule is characterized for being scattered in pieces
of Law). The Rule of Law wins over the and inadequate.
Delicate Rule of Law. This proposition of an
environment where an open order prevails
and isn't subject to central arranging or the
commands of the administering can be
linked to that called the «spontaneous
organization framework of social action. For
this, it is basic to consider other angles such
as a vision of social cooperation among
freemen and the necessity of an open
arrangement created from sensible legal and
ethical rules.18 The last mentioned is at that
point built up as a component of the «basic
necessity» for quiet coexistence, caught on
as a condition characteristic in any show that
pursues growth and the political, social, and
financial improvement of a nation. The
thought of the predominance of a Rule of
Law that reflects the predominance of
general rules of conduct must be the item of
social advancement and information (or
data) that people procure over time through
trial and blunder. Typically recognized from
the show Rule of Law understood from the
proposition of creators such as Hume.19 A
sacred show represented by a rule of Law
can be expressed through the protection of
the values of the radicalism of the xix
century and is based on a spontaneous
advancement that's the item of human
activities but not of human design. If it is
considered that arrange or a framework of
an organization is basic for binding legal
information, it must moreover be considered
that people within the work out of
flexibility, take activity (juridical) based on
the data they have and this data must reach a

18
Scalia, A. (1989). The Rule of Law as a Law of
Rules. The University of Chicago Law Review, 56(4),
1175-1188.
19
Ross, S. (1992). The Rule of Law and Lawyers in
Kenya. The Journal of Modern African Studies, 30(3),
421-442.

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5230-2030