Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Silicon-Based Reactive Intermediates: Intermediate .
Silicon-Based Reactive Intermediates: Intermediate .
INTERMEDIATES
rare
or unknown
-
-
X = C, 0, N, Si, P,etc.
Chart 3 - 2 Reactive intermediates of silicon and carbon
This difference between carbon and silicon has been ascribed to different
HOMO-LUMO gaps in the divalent species of the two elements: The HOMO-
LUMO gap is much larger in the case of silicon (218 kJ mol- 52 kcal mol- ') ',
',
than carbon (13 1kJ mol- 31 kcal mol- ').3 For substituted silylenes, as with
carbenes, calculations show that the singlet and triplet states are differently
affected by the nature of the s~bstituent,'~
7~ donors (e.g., heteroatoms with lone
pairs, 0, N, etc.) stabilize the singlet state in particular. This suggests that
backbonding, of the type already discussed in Chapter 2, may be important.
Walsh and co-workers have estimated the divalent stabilization energy of
silylenes, as shown in Table 3.1 [DSSE (R2Si:) = D(R3Si-R)-D(R2Si-R), where
R is the substituent on the ~ilylene].'~*'~
3-1 3-2
Scheme 3-1
Ph -solution Ph
+ :SiMe,
CH OH
&H,
y
*0
SiMe,
3
Ph
Scheme 3-2
siliranes, by swapping alkenes?l This route was used to prepare the more highly
strained silirenes (1-silacycloprop-2-enes, Scheme 3-3B4') such as 3-542;the
example shown is stable to di~tillation!~~ Silirenes will, however, also
thermolyze to give silylenes.4 Siliranes generally react highly exothermically
with 02,H20, S8, HCI, and rapidly, even at -70°C, with Siliranes also
undergo insertion reactions with olefins to form silacyclopentanes, a reaction
that does not involve silylenes (Scheme 3-3C).46
A Me,Si
r Br
LBrTHF
Mg
- Me,Si
3 108OC
- -
- + :SiMe,
Scheme 3-3
The relief of strain in small rings also provides sufficient driving force to
prepare silylenes from silacyclobutanes, silacyclobutenes,'0~47and cyclotrisi-
+
lanes?8 The former compounds fragment via a retro [2 21-cycloaddition to
produce silenes and alkene~.~' A silene bearing an Si-H group can rearrange to
the silylene (see below, Scheme 3-4).50 The isomerization of silenes 3-6 to
silylenes 3-7 (and vice versa) has been examined for a number of systems (see
Chapter 15).51At 471"C, for instance, the AGZ = 178kJmol-' (43 kcal mol-')
for the rearrangement in Scheme 3-4A, as shown by trapping studies with
+
butadiene: Both silene ([2 41-cycloaddition-+ 3-8) and dimethylsilylene-
+
derived products (3-9 3-10) are observed (Scheme 3-4).s2*53The energ
difference between the silylene 3-7 and silene 3-6 is rather small in this case.2
Scheme 3-4
44 SILICON-BASED REACTIVE INTERMEDIATES
Np=Naphthalenide
Scheme 3-5
3.7.7.7. Stable Si/y/enes A new era in the study of silylenes began with the
isolation of the first stable Si" species by Jutzi and c o - w o r k e r ~ Using
.~~~~~
similar conditions to those described above, but with the very bulky Cp' groups
(Me5C5) as the organic ligands, the reduction of Cp*zSiClz with sodium
naphthalenide (or other alkali metals) led to the silylene Cp*zSi:(silicocene or
silacene, in analogy with ferrocene). The compounds could be isolated and
characterized by X-ray crystallography (Eq. 3.3). Initially, there was some
controversy about the electronic structure of this species. In the crystal, both
linear (3-11) and bent forms are observed. It was thought that both singlet and
triplet species might be present. Subsequently, calculations and the consideration
of crystal packing forces led to the conclusion that the bent form could also be
the singlet form of the silylene.
+ M - + Si : (3.3)
4 3-1 1
+
aromatic [2 x lone pair (on N) alkene = 6e] silylene 3-12 is 58 kJ mol-
(14 kcal mol-‘) more stable than the saturated analogue 3-13 (Chart 3-4).60*62
Silylenes 3-12 and 3-13 are much more stable than silacenes 3-11 noted above,
displaying no reaction with typical silylene traps (HSiEt3)nor polar compounds
such as THF, pyridine, PMe3, and NEt3. They can, however, be converted into
silanimines (see below),63 undergo lP-additions with arylimines,64and form
metal silene complexes with nickel.65The analogous silylene 3-14 undergoes a
series of interesting reactions with ketones.66
A-
3-12 3-13 3-14
Chari3-4
Scheme3-6
3.7.2-1. Insertion Reactions Silylenes insert into relatively weak bonds (Si-Si,
Si-H), or into stronger bonds when a heteroatom silicon bond will be formed
(0-H, O-Si56368).69Calculations suggest that insertion reactions proceed by
46 SILICON-BASED REACTIVE INTERMEDIATES
s s
\ /
SIR,
Scheme 3-7
Scheme 3-8
3-15
Scheme 3-9
2. Si-H Insertion: This is one of the standard reactions used to prove the
presence of silylenes (Eq. 3.4).'9723731,71,72
The relative reactivity for the
SILYLENES (RzSI:) 47
SiEt,
(3.4)
relative reactivity H2Si :> ClHSi :> HFSi :>> C12Si :, F2Si : (3.5)
3. O-H Insertion: Silylene insertion into O-H bonds leads to synthetically
useful difunctional silanes: The Si-H and Si-OR functional groups that
are found in the products will react under different conditions (Eq. 3.6, see
Chapters 5 and 7).74
OR
(3.6)
H-H - :Sic$
-H
H
SiCI, (3.7)
Me,Si
Me,Si
(Me3Si)2CH
CH(SiMe,),
CH(SiMe,),
0 I
CH(SiMe,),
3-16
(3.10)
Scheme3-10
\ /
\I + Me,SiCI,
CI,
Si
-Si.
Si
.CI + R+R R,R
catalyst R,R R,R’
/ \ I\ R‘
/ \ +A
CIMe,Si
Si
*SiMe,CI
/ \
Scheme 3-11
(3.11)
HX
K
\
* C
t’
+ X- (3.12)
I
(3.13)
Me,SiCI SiMe,
AICI, (3.14)
“Me,Si’“
<I%
The route in Eq. 3.12 involving silenes, the silicon analogues of alkenes, is
quite attractive. However, stable silenes have only recently been prepared and
isolated (see below) and are, therefore, rather difficult to come by. Further
50 SILICON-BASED REACTIVE INTERMEDIATES
compromising this approach is the fact that silenes are even more susceptible to
nucleophilic attack than tetrahedral silicon.
In contrast to Eqs. 3.11 and 3.12, the route shown in Eq. 3.13 looks quite
attractive for the preparation of a silylium ion. Thermodynamically, a more
stable cation results from a less stable cation, and very non-nucleophilic
counterions may be used in the reaction. Many attempts have been made to use
this chemistry for the preparation of silicon cation^.^' Preeminent is the work of
Lambert and co-workers. The claimed to prepare (i-PrS)3Si+:6 and later
the free triphenylsilylium ionJ7 (using an experiment suggested by Corey,
Eq. 3.15).98
Conductivity measurements were used by Lambert to support the claim that a
silylium ion had been prepared in solution: Conductivities of 1.13 cm2 m o h d
mol in H2CCl2and 179.5 in CH3CN were observed. However, these claims were
aggressively questioned in a series of papers by Olah and co-workers, who noted
the I3C NMR chemical shifts were small, 29SiNMR data could not be observed,
and the X-ra structure shows Ph3SiOC103 to be a covalent tetrahedral
molecule?971d01ah believes the conductance resulted from partial hydrolysis of
the silyl perchlorate. In a similar vein, Eaborn has shown that the solvolyses of
some very hindered silyl perchlorates are extremely slow. The fact that
hydrolysis is slow even in the very ionizing solvent HOCH2CF3suggests that
Me0
1
Me-Si-Me
(Me,Si),C
I
c---
MeOH
slow solvolysis
0,CIO
\
Me-Si-Me
'
-CF,CH,OH
slow solvolysis
CF,CH,O,
Me- Si - Me
(Me,Si),C
Scheme 3-12
The silatropylium ion (C&H7+) has been shown to be more stable than the
Ph-substituted silyl cation (PhSi Me;?)in the gas phase.lo2Therefore, Olah tried
+
to make the silatropylium ion in solution (Eq. 3.16). It was also found not to be a
free cation. All this evidence suggests that the putative silylium ions of Lambert
were stable neither in solution nor the solid phase, and rather were tetraco-
ordinate silicon species. loo
H OCIO,
The criteria for establishing the presence of a silylium ion are varied,
including a high, positive 29SiNMR shift (225-380 ppm),lo3complete planarity
at silicon, and 120" C-Si-C bond angles. The ability to prepare such silylium
ions clearly depends on the ability to develop and utilize counterions that have
SILYLENES (R&) 51
9 9
much less nucleophilicity than perchlorate. Reed and co-workers utilized the
bulky, non-nucleophilic counterion Br&B 1H6- with i-Pr3Si-I- 3-17 (Figure
3.lA).lM Lambert similarly demonstrated this principle using (F5C6)4B- as a
counterion to Et3Si+.lo5 In the latter case, instead of coordination by the
counterion (F5C6)4B- , the solvent for the crystallization, in this case toluene,
acted as a donor to Et,Si+ (3-18, Figure 3.1B). This makes evident both the
higher electrophilicity and steric accessibility of silicon when compared to
carbon. On the basis of the criteria noted above (average C-Si-C = 114-1 17”,
29
Si NMR = 90- 115ppm), these systems approach true silicon cations: Reed
estimates about 36-52% silylium ion character for his compound.’03The 29Si
NMR chemical shift of i-Pr3Si+ X- has now been established as a convenient
scale for the degree of silylium ion character.lo6In neither of these two structures
are the criteria for a true silylium ion quite met. It has been argued by Schleyer
and Apeloig that Lambert’s complex is a Wheland intermediatelo7 and not a
silylium ion at all. lo* However, we have seen that Friedel-Crafts reactions with
chlorosilanes do not lead to aromatic silylation (Eq. 3.14). Similarly, this
putative “Wheland intermediate” does not lead to electrophilic silylation of the
aromatic system. Thus, experimentally, 3-18 behaves as a weakly solvated
cation. The debate has been nicely summarized by Houk.”’
Lambert and Zhao have more recently described the trimesitylsilylium ion
3-19, which has a 29Si NMR chemical shift of 225.5ppm (Eq. 3.17).’1° This
value is within the predicted range for a silylium ion”’ and has been so
proclaimed.’ l 2 In this case, presumably, the bulkier ligands on silicon preclude
association between solvent and silicon. The preparation and characterization of
such an electron-deficient silicon compound in a condensed phase is a notable
synthetic achievement. It is to be hoped that an X-ray crystal structure of this
compound can be obtained to finally put this debate to rest.
3-19 (3.17)
52 SILICON-BASED REACTIVE INTERMEDIATES
Silicon-based radicals' 13*' l4 are very reactive species that have been much less
studied than the other reactive intermediates described in this chapter (see also
Chapter 7)."5*116They may be somewhat stabilized by adjacent 7r system^."^
However, unlike carbon radicals,'" alkyl and aryl substituents do not provide
substantial stabilization to silyl radicals." By contrast, adjacent silyl groups' l9
and electropositive substituents'20 do stabilize silyl radicals. There are few
examples of isolated silyl radicals, not surprisingly. One important exception is
the radical (Et3Si),Si' that persists for greater than one month at room
temperature!12'
There are relatively few reports of the utilization of radical-based silicon
chemistry in organic synthesis, with the exception of hydrosilylation of C=C and
C=O bonds, although this situation is changing (see Chapters 7,8,and 12). In a
sense, the situation is similar to the case in carbon chemistry some decades ago,
when prevailing wisdom suggested that the gulf between selective synthesis and
radical chemistry could not be brid ed. That situation has now dramatically
changed for carbon-based radicals. 12' Given the current state of knowledge of
silyl radicals, a similar change may be expected in the application of their
general utility in organic synthesis.
One notable feature of silicon radicals is the degree to which they react
stereoselectively. Unlike carbon radicals, which do not maintain their
stereoidentity, silicon radicals retain the chirality of their precursor to a
remarkable degree."3*'23 Thus Brook and Duff showed that the chiral
acylmethyl-a-naphthylphenylsilane underwent photolytic decomposition and
radical trapping by CCl, with 64% e.e. (Scheme 3-13).'24 Similarly, Sakurai,
Kunada, and co-workers showed that an optically active hydrosilane could
undergo radical chlorination in CC14, initiated by benzoyl peroxide, with
retention of c~nfiguration.'~~
"%,
Ph'?
-;i -hv
CCI,
I%,,
ph'?*
NP
- CCI, '%,.
Ph'si
.CI
NP
64% e.e.
Scheme3-13
R'CH;. These effects have been clearly discussed in the context of carefully
tabulated rate data.' 13~131The special case of radical chain reactions initiated by
azobisisobutyronitrile, using persilylhydrosilanes (Eq. 3.19), will be discussed
in detail in Chapter 7. Silyl radicals may also be generated by the photochemical
decomposition of N-silylazo compounds (Scheme 3-14).'32
0 (3.18)
R3SiH 0 t R3Sio + oo)(Ph + ,,Ao,
hv or A 0
Me3Si,SiMe3
Me3SiNSi\H
+ A C I -
A~BN Me3Si,SiMe3
Me3Si'
si
'CI
+ A H
AlBN =
NCY"""
(3.19)
R3Si/N\"/SiR3 .-= hv N, +
Scheme3-14
2 R3Si* - CCI,
2R,SiCI
+
0
Scheme 3-15
54 SILICON-BASED REACTIVE INTERMEDIATES
CN
I
TCNE = " F C N
CN
Oxidation
1
TCNE
Scheme 3-16
Me$,
Me$'
SiMe,
I
Si
'H
+ C T C I
CI
- Me$,
Me$'
1
SiMe,
Si
'CI
(3.21)
HSiX, -. -t-BuOO-t-Bu
Six, H
Scheme 3-17
+
(3.22)
135% 0.65 5.46
+ Et,SiH
Ar Ar
I 1
-I
Ar- Si Si -Ar
I
Ar- Si - Si -Ar
-hv
Ar-
Ar Ar
I
Ar-Si-.
Si-Ar
-Si -Q-Ar
I I
a
Ar =a
Ar Ar Ar
(3.24)
The silicon community has not exercised the same degree of rigor in examining
the structure of silyl anions, when compared to silyl cations. In the gas phase,
56 SILICON-BASED REACTIVE INTERMEDIATES
Me,SiCI -Na I Hg
(Me,Si),Hg
Scheme 3-18
- Li
2 Me,SiLi
Red solution
Scheme 3-19
SlLYL ANIONS (R3Si-) 57
(3Ph4
CI Osi.CI
- 3 ~ iTHF
,
sonication
B p h
.
Li 0 si Li
4 Me,SiCI
Me,Si
oph4
'Si .SiMe,
Scheme 3-20
I HMPA DMPU
(3.25)
Ph,SiH - MeLi
Ph,SiMe + LiH (3.26)
-
the ring-opening, reductive cleavage of cycl~trisilanes.'~~
SiR,Ar Li
ArR,Si ArR,SiLi (3.27)
Me,Si-SiMe, - KH
HMPA
Me,SiK + Me$
KOMe
Me,Si-SiMe, Me,SiK + Me,Si LJ
Me,Si-SiMe, -Bu,NF
Me$-
+ NB~,
+ Me,SiF
Scheme3-21
MeMgBr
(CO),CoSiPh, Ph,SiMgBr
Scheme 3-22
56%
SiPh,NEt, Si Ph,O-i-Pr
Scheme 3-23
SlLYL ANIONS (R3Si-) 59
SiPh,
8% > 90%
Scheme3-24
In the absence of stabilizing groups, silyl anions react like Grignard reagents
with carbonyl compounds. Nucleophilic attack generates the a-silylalkoxide,
which can be isolated as the a-hydroxysilane after acid workup (Scheme
3-25A). When the carbonyl group bears stabilizing groups (electron-with-
drawing groups), however, the resulting alkoxide 3-23 can undergo further
reaction via a [1,2]-silyl migration from carbon to oxygen (Brook rearrange-
ment; see Chapter 15) to give stabilized carbanion 3-24.Hydrolysis in this case
leads to the alkoxysilane or its hydrolysis products (Scheme 3-25B). Note that
adventitious proton sources can quench the alkoxide 3-23 to give the simple
carbinol3-25 prior to rearrangement.
n
".Y = Ph
+
'rc Ph
H,O. ROH
\ or other proton source
Scheme 3-25
60 SILICON-BASED REACTIVE INTERMEDIATES
No Reaction -
b
OLi si,: ' .
-
OSiMe, ""l
SiMe,
Scheme 3-26
,SiMe,
(i)(PhMe,Si),CuLi
Scheme 3-27
Next Page
x BONDS TO SILICON 61
OH
pNPh,SiLi
C 0' -8 E&NPh,SiCuCN
D Li
OH
SiPh,NEt,
Scheme 28
Silicon forms ( p - p ) n bonds only with difficulty. Prior to the 1970s, it was
generally understood that, with the exception of carbon, Group 14 elements
could not form stable double bonds.6 It was believed that the poor overlap of p
orbitals, due either to large distances between atoms (e.g., Si-Si) or to poor size
match (e.g., Si-C), precluded favorable bonding interaction^.'^' However,
during the 1970s it became evident that such species could be prepared in the gas
phase and then trapped. In 1981, the first crystalline examples of compounds
containing Si=Si8 and Si=C7 bonds, res ectively, were isolated; many examples
have been reported subsequently.49*198~1g9When compared with carbon, such T
bonds are not particularly strongzm and, more important, are kinetically very
reactive. As has been noted, the increased length of bonds to sp3-hybridized
silicon makes it much more susceptible to nucleophilic attack than carbon. This
is even more true for sp2-hybridized silicon. We will briefly review the
preparation, structural characteristics?" and reactivity of the most important of
these species, the disilenes Si=Si?02 silenes Si=C, and silanones Si=O. Other
multiply bonded species (Si=N, Si=S, Si=P, etc.) will be noted.