kok ee HR MD JOURNAL OF PEKING UNIVERSITY (HEALTH SCIENCES) Vol.36 No.2 Apr. 2004 ACAD Bt At a SSSA ASR PE 2 RRS 2 BB AP Clot RECREATE 100081) (Sem) i a a tm IS SS RS 10 A LF RE CT EOL TT, DL Coltene SE EAR HE Herculite 3 Ar ANN, 2 24h 37 CIAL OUP AA AA GRE. wR BOL PSO G5 E- 2T AA y (33.0 2 1.8) MPa, AOR Wy(26.7 25.2) MPa, SEPA EH Fb 20 (HAL A A RT SU ME SL RASCAL FAM — EPIRA [eRe] R783.1— [SMRARAREB] A [HEHE] 1671-167X (2004) 02-0207.03 The effect of simulate intraoral sandblas and composite resin ing on the band strength between enamel ping'® , WEL Yan’ ,DENG Xi (A, Special Department, 2. Insite of Mat ang! University Stomatological Hospital, Beijing 100081 ,China) KEY WORDS Dental enamel; Composite resins; Sandblast SUMMARY Objective: To study whether the bond strength between enamel and composite resin could be enhanced by intraoral sand abrasive. Methods; Ten human maxillary first incisior teeth were divided into 2 groups. The experimental group was sandblasted with 30 jum Al,O, (Colet-Sand, pressure 300 kPa) from a distance of 5 mm for 5 seconds, and the control group were not sandblasted. ‘The Herculite composite resin composite cylinders were bonded with Coltene system. Bonded specimens were stored in 37 © distilled water for 24 h, then were subjected to shear force in a testing machine. Stress at failure was calculated in Mpa, and mode of failure was recorded. ‘The Student ¢ test was applied to the data, Re sults; The shear bond strength of experimental groups was (33.0 +1.8) MPa , and that of control groups was (26.7 £5.2) MPa , there was significant difference between these two groups. All the adhe- sive failures happened at the enamel- composite resin interface , except that cohesive failure happened in one sandblasted specimen. Conclusion; Intraoral sandblasting could significantly enhance the shear bond strength between enamel and composite resin. (J Peking Univ { Health Sci] , 2004 36 :207 -209) JRE SL Ay UE A SF PRA ME AE PITRE HORA Be Fy MAK AR AA SE AESCP FRSA A OL TS BRS AR EI HA AB ARI AD FAVA SE BR (A BE BE 2M) BVA OF IR AST BE) AO A ICE HREM RREK. aARAE S S ‘PRUE A ER EEA FE OE. A ARO ELE ALD A eH TE FOE RET SL EAI ‘ACorrespoeing anor email, shanghy79kq@ sin. com AGTH. ARH TAO RAA TSE SRT DY HD HAS 1 P8SAR LA REE WC 10 WFC Fe Be AY AE A SCALE IK PAPO aL 4 J), DR A a REA EAE 2 om, A 1.5 om HATH DADE PA FB SHA BA i Hk EE, RUNES RTARTA FT PLA Btak ie Kee MR MD = 208 « JOURNAL OF PEKING UNIVERSITY (HEALTH SCIENCES) Yol.36 No.2 Apr 2004 12 BIRR ASE Coltene i 4 #46 (Coltene AG , Switzerland ): etching agent AQ HHI] [ 15% (AARC) WEAR], One coat bond # AH HITE MI. Herculite 52 4 4 HK (Kerr, U.S.A). 1.3 BR ‘HZ 30 pm fy ALO, BE (3M ESPE Germany), [1 PyiGBH{(DENTO-PREP, Germany) . 1.4 AR LAL GRP ARIAE OR Ale HRA BU LC FLEE) , RECIH 150,400 600 FI Si-C Bb, 550 27 ami ALA HAR AS BL AEP aE A He VETS FREE 20 (5S By SB HACE OLR UL R18 HAL FORE. (PRE DLR hy Sea ST A 5 ‘TMF Bh FETA HE 300 kPa MHA EF, A 30 yum ff) Al,O, Bie ACHE A BACT Sm $445] WEDS S LIS B45 FE AS HY Oh He TL EB 1.4.2 GRARIONEEE eR TRAIL Coltene i BERR 1 5 FARAH AS BEAT LA Pit: EF AT Ze TR Ai — AEB etching agent (15% BHR) ARDR 30 sD, RK 20s, TERIA EOS Ah IT — ATLA, RR 3.3 mm@YZFAH IM, One coat bond £549 9 ti FH TAR, CHK AEE JENA 30 8, RR TE RAR AG 3.5 mm ROR LH HH , Hf Her- cculite 5-298 BE FEA BI PY , VAD 1S mm EE $63.5 mom (SE A ARB, ETB 40 » Fada wR, 1.4.3 WERE STARR T 37 T fELIIKIG 24 b, RAI DCS-5000 WHE AETMAL, PPR EAT RE | mm/min, WH BH OS Pr LE ADE A RA, HE SOB PT HF HY SD) MBS EA AES AS DS SUR SBI AL, 144 BiH FTAA Be 2 GR SLAPS BREA RB RL OA i SAR RR ETA (P.<0.05,28 1)» RiRIBTIES 20 4% OPTON (ELE FOCREUARE 77 1 Se SUPE A A Ea BL, RPA HY OD HL FS A eA SLB i SB CELE 1 FMS RAPT NEE ‘Table 1 The shear bond strength between enamel a composite resi Croape 7 Shear bond siveagih( MPs 53 r=) 26.745.2 0818 ‘Control group s Experiment poop 5 = P<0,05 0s comtal group. 3 itt SAME Ea RE TT a BFL SL a BS SOE FE RUD EE A AIBA ZS A AL HGF ARABS TALE TOF Be Ha RF I AE EY WA, LAMCOM. Pa ATA AT ARP FLL, MORES OL BREE BE. SR SLE SF DE AZOLE ERE 1 Pm BE SE OR Ee HA LET (RSJ ESE 2 AL PE, Carpentar'”) YR) FARA AYE FB ka FS BBE TTA FN AST HL PL ABT F A PE A IR OR, DB Ss a AE TALENT ES DL AM SoH HE ACTER AL EB TTF Re PAA RADAR P, FRASER. SHEE OAR RA AL 27 ~ 50 pm MH) ALO, BPE, Denia’”! 45 Sadoun'” 5:51 4546" BE (scan electron mi- croscope SEM) #@H4 50 um fi) ALO, ABS FTG RBA VI 253 kPa(2.5 A AAU) AVE I AGB 14 5 AN RE TTT RAL AR A RE FORD SAWN AERA. BA BREET 0 AD TT RNR SMA PRE SA AL 1 SL SRE, MAE ADEE RD MF PS Ae) REARIR BENIN CHEAT TAP RRO A BKM REFER Bh BS SE Ay ALA DD HI oA. ALBERS BRO ADS TRS LAMAN DERE RS RTRARO A. Poi VATE SU Pa Rs FP aoe SY Be FE RAIN AR IR BEARS LB BES Are MT RIT BR, JA TG EL A FS, RA SER CIP EM APRS A TTT wl Re 5 Fh gw FE Hi HT BETIS My BIL I, As Ae RDSOL AF RIG AR 5 A HS PEFR. TE ARLES OE Pb A Le GLE AB TRIE, ASTI T BRET EMU HF CAE SEIS FRA SK MISE ARTE, PEE 98S SOLE SIG AR AE aR HE 9 I EE PEE BY BSE RAT EBAY I I. Del al?) ht A RT ES ee 08 BOO FE SE A 8 SRR) 5M ae TP 5 HT) ROG ARRAS Uy 5 VR A HR Sch DURE IE , RELI EEE BE HARRI IA FOB ED PMA AH 2 ~3 AB DAE BY EDS A A Wa AY 3 ~ 4 A PA SF A ZT HB BES OT BR. AM HT RES AE OT tHe, AP EAT OY UNS BER TR Ae FL) , BO A a] Mi Hr Fi HH 6 ALORA R RA A AT GRR SS ARR ILO ESRI. LATE ACRKEARR EAI LL” RAC A SRE aR ESE HP LF 2000 4 10 HA SEERA ALTE PRL A HE 700 TFET TORE A 2 EAS DESERET a” CMB APS) HAT TRL RE RL 36 7h. 2001 4.9 FAR — HN ALTAR TESTE 14 4+. 2001 $F Fi CoE RY BL SMe A HM BE ‘TEARI9 (PDCDS Hf IAS PR BEBE IT“ BEA UES) F—TPARIS 5 RTS AEA AO EE” URI HR SORES 4. SO, BREAN RRR T HOY RA MIRREN HO EPS AALS TE. MAL 2003 AF 12 OA ‘BEA Ge VENA 55 PURER SEE RIE 233 IEP SCI Be FON 63 A, AEMUINT25 177.029, SERDAR IE 7 REA ALA HARE K 60 HK. TE RRS 3 SE aT RA ARN” PL AREER AEA TL RCT RS Se SOT, APL EH 4H REALL, Teoh LE BL, B32 NRA OPTS 430 TEMS ANE, SLAMS RBA (AL)? 264 TF TEAIREA. IE] HBA 35-A HSS ALI 4 A, AOR AA ASR AE ESP As EW AER 55 NFL AT RES REA RS TPH, Hes EN AO AAR T MY SLI, 2008 eM a AL 007 (PR RNS AE +209 + FTE AL BEC HE AT EE, ELC RL A SLA LHD SR I OS OE AG FE — A SARK 1 Hobson RS, MeCabe IF. Relationship between enamel etch chars. leis end resinenamel bond stengih( J}. Be Des J, 2002, 192. 463-68 2 Capeniar MA. Eft of varying sfare oxure on bond strength of ene semi-precious and aabprecous ceramo-alloy( J]. J Prothe Den, 1979, 42:86 3. Sadoua M, Asmunsen E. Bonding of rein coments to an aluninous era; a new surface tesiment( J)” Dest Materials, 1994, 10, tas 149 4 Paulo EC. Evaluation of mic-tesile, chear und tensile ets deter- rising the bond strength of three adhesive sytes[ J]. Dent Mater, 1998, 14,304 ~398 5 Dall B, Van NR. Shear or tensile boad strength of retin composite bonded to ceamie[ I]. J Dewt Res, 1997, 471591 ~ 1596 6 Winada Y, Matrumre Y, Kio H, etal. Elst of salar vicoty on the penetration of resin into etched human enamel (J). Oper Dent, 2000, 25; 274 -282 7 Denit Sen. Shear bond stengh of cein lating cement to gass-ini- trated pores sliminus oxide eres J)- J Pret Dat, 2000, 83 210-215 5 OLE, FLAMUR. ZtMamotN 7 RAL waicin its cote 0 88) (CRS HIRE) HU HS ERR BE HAE RARE MS EL, NO ROA TS, A 2000 FH TES, Hay SENG SSE RE ARE BEI I 59. Se SCL ca 303014 Fh ANH 47.34 EFS, JEEL SCH 1 A A AE UE ABP GH APR RN Fle TSM — 3 TE, BA PRAWMT LK, MERA LAHIRI R 26 Ke R201 FEAT A RAE SK 1H RELA AHO? Dl, ALR H 6 REAL OL, AREAL, KABA LAME 08 77. WIE Sly ERED LEB PSII TA LB Be ELI ICH RAS A AN Fs (1) BIER AER, 292 fi Js SCL ACR IES 77 Hs AHF #4 224. 373, (2) ERR RRO N 85 He RRR SLI RAREX 86K, (3) RAMRLOM. (4) PASH 105; REM 6 H,2 AECL, (5) HARE ae RERRL I SBR LINN FI, (6) REN EIA IT A, SAA AO SF OLS EE ATRL A OA CSF, UR RRR ATE. SAR MRR Te FORE HOA SETS Ha RSA AOI RABI AL A MEI EE UO FAB, WOE MMA E MTA, HOMER hup:// gene. bjmu. edu. on FTE , (CREAFARRAL BRE H0)