Essay

Passage 1

The article and the lecture are both about    personality risks.The
author of the article introduces that personality risks put in danger
your life and also the life of others like families or friends. In the
listening passage, the lecturer points out that some personality
risks have to be taken.

First and foremost, the author of the reading states that there is
not necessary to take personality risks for nothing in reward. The
lecturer, however, disagrees. He states that some people take
natural risks for nature. He goes on to say that personality risk
some of them have rewards.

The author also claims that personality risks are illogical and that
in some cases can be taken like a suicidal. Again, the lecturer
believes there are flaws in the writer's argument. The speaker
holds that personality risk are not an suicidal act, he thinks that
take risks and suicidal are not the same.

Finally, the author wraps his argument by positing that soldiers

are on danger when they are in battlefield but he defends saying
that it they're job. The professor in the listening passage, not
surprisingly, is doubtful that this is accurate, but he also things
that the persons who ride motorcycle they don't thinks their gonna
have an accident.

In conclusion, although the reading and the lecture are both about
personality risks. However the writer disagree    with taking
personality risks. In the other hand the sparker believes that take
risks have benefits in humans because in some risks your body
goes through adrenaline that its a chemical process important for
humans.
Passage 2
No one can deny that fiction and non-fiction, there are both good
main types for books. Some people like fiction because they don't
like to read about history or the life of persons who were
important, maybe they don't found this type of books interesting,   
they would have their own reason to prefer fictions books.
However I really don't like to read a lot, but in my opinion I would
like to read books that their main type it is non-fiction.   
I prefer to read non-fictions books because when I read, I like it to
be about an interesting topic and one that really attracts my
attention, a book that I can take advantage of and learn about, for
example history or biographies from persons who were important
in their time and they still being important today.
I believes that instead of read a book about fiction I prefer to see
a movie that tells a story or a serie that its about a novel.
I consider my self that I am a curious person who likes to know
and have questions about everything, for example, how was the
life in other years?, how does people lived and survived time
ago?. Reading non-fictions books it is one way how I can clarify
all this questions.
To concludes, I generally prefer to read books of non-fictions for
the reason I just give up.