Midyear Review Form

You might also like

Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt
Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 12

MID-YEAR REVIEW FORM (MRF)

Name of Employee: VENILYN APRIL A. BARRIENTOS Name of Rater: CEFERINA T. CABAL


Position: TEACHER III Position: SCHOOL PRINCIPAL I
Bureau/ Center/ Service/ Division: BUREAU OF ELEMENTARY EDUCATION/MASI PRIMARY SCHOOL/PAMPLONA/CAGAYAN Date of Review: FEBRUARY 2023
Rating Period: AUGUST 2022-JULY 2023

MID-YEAR REVIEW/ RATING


WEIGHT
MFO KRAS OBJECTIVES TIMELINE MOV PERFORMANCE TARGET Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) MID-YEAR REVIEW RESULTS
PER KRA
Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Basic 1. Content 1. Applied knowledge of August 2022- 7.00% Classroom Observation Quality
Education Knowledge content within and across July 2023 Tool (COT) rating
Services and Pedagogy curriculum teaching sheet/s or inter-observer Demonstrated Level 7 in
areas. agreement form/s done Objective 1 as shown in
(PPST 1.1.2) through onsite/ face-to- COT rating sheets/ inter-
face/ in-person observer agreement forms
classroom observation.
#DIV/0!
Efficiency

Objective was met within


the allotted time
Basic 1. Content 2. Used a range of August 2022- 7.00% Classroom Observation Quality
Education Knowledge teaching strategies that July 2023 Tool (COT) rating
Services and Pedagogy enhance learner sheet/s or inter-observer Demonstrated Level 7 in
achievement in literacy agreement form/s done Objective 2 as shown in
and numeracy skills. through onsite/ face-to- COT rating sheets/ inter-
(PPST 1.4.2) face/ in-person observer agreement forms
classroom observation.
#DIV/0!
Efficiency

Objective was met within


the allotted time
Basic 1. Content 3. Applied a range of August 2022- 7.00% Classroom Observation Quality
Education Knowledge teaching strategies to July 2023 Tool (COT) rating
Services and Pedagogy develop critical and sheet/s or inter-observer Demonstrated Level 7 in
creative thinking, as well agreement form/s done Objective 3 as shown in
as other higher order through onsite/ face-to- COT rating sheets/ inter-
thinking skills. face/ in-person observer agreement forms #DIV/0!
(PPST 1.5.2) classroom observation.
Efficiency

Objective was met within


the allotted time
MID-YEAR REVIEW/ RATING
WEIGHT
MFO KRAS OBJECTIVES TIMELINE MOV PERFORMANCE TARGET Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) MID-YEAR REVIEW RESULTS
PER KRA
Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Basic 2. Learning 4. Managed classroom August 2022- 7.00% Classroom Observation Quality
Education Environment structure to engage July 2023 Tool (COT) rating
Services and Diversity learners, individually or in sheet/s or inter-observer Demonstrated Level 7 in
of Learners groups, in meaningful agreement form/s done Objective 4 as shown in
exploration, discovery through onsite/ face-to- COT rating sheets/ inter-
and hands-on activities face/ in-person observer agreement forms #DIV/0!
within a range of physical classroom observation.
learning environments. Efficiency
(PPST 2.3.2)
Objective was met within
the allotted time
Basic 2. Learning 5. Managed learner August 2022- 7.00% Classroom Observation Quality
Education Environment behavior constructively by July 2023 Tool (COT) rating
Services and Diversity applying positive and sheet/s or inter-observer Demonstrated Level 7 in
of Learners non-violent discipline to agreement form/s done Objective 5 as shown in
ensure learning-focused through onsite/ face-to- COT rating sheets/ inter-
environments. face/ in-person observer agreement forms
(PPST 2.6.2) classroom observation.
#DIV/0!

Efficiency

Objective was met within


Basic 2. Learning 6. Used differentiated, August 2022- the allotted time
7.00% Classroom Observation Quality
Education Environment developmentally July 2023 Tool (COT) rating
Services and Diversity appropriate learning sheet/s or inter-observer Demonstrated Level 7 in
of Learners experiences to address agreement form/s done Objective 6 as shown in
learners’ gender, needs, through onsite/ face-to- COT rating sheets/ inter-
strengths, interests and face/ in-person observer agreement forms
experiences. classroom observation.
(PPST 3.1.2) Efficiency
#DIV/0!
Objective was met within
the allotted time
MID-YEAR REVIEW/ RATING
WEIGHT
MFO KRAS OBJECTIVES TIMELINE MOV PERFORMANCE TARGET Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) MID-YEAR REVIEW RESULTS
PER KRA
Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Basic 3. Curriculum 7. Planned, managed and August 2022- 7.00% Classroom Observation Quality
Education and Planning implemented July 2023 Tool (COT) rating
Services developmentally sheet/s or inter-observer Demonstrated Level 7 in
sequenced teaching and agreement form/s done Objective 7 as shown in
learning processes to through onsite/ face-to- COT rating sheets/ inter-
meet curriculum face/ in-person observer agreement forms #DIV/0!
requirements and varied classroom observation.
teaching contexts. Efficiency
(PPST 4.1.2)
Objective was met within
the allotted time
Basic 3. Curriculum 8. Participated in collegial August 2022- 7.00% 1. Proof/s of attendance in LAC
sessions / FGDs / meetings / other
Quality
Education and Planning discussions that use July 2023 collegial discussions
2. Minutes of LAC sessions/ FGDs/
Services teacher and learner meetings/ other collegial discussions Planned for enriched
feedback to enrich on use of teacher and learner teaching practice based on
feedback to enrich teaching practice
teaching practice. 3. Reflection notes of teachers on LAC sessions/ FGDs/
(PPST 4.4.2) their demonstration of teaching
practices following participation from
meetings/ other collegial
discussions attended, as
LAC sessions/ FGDs / meetings /
other collegial discussions that use
shown in MOV 3
#DIV/0!
teacher and learner feedback to
enrich teaching practice, with proof/s Timeliness
of attendance
4. Any equivalent ALS form/document
that highlights the objective

Participated in at least 4
LACs/FGDs/ meetings as
evidently shown in any 1
Basic 3. Curriculum 9. Selected, developed, August 2022- 7.00% Classroom Observation Quality
of the given MOV
Education and Planning organized and used July 2023 Tool (COT) rating
Services appropriate teaching and sheet/s or inter-observer Demonstrated Level 7 in
learning resources, agreement form/s done Objective 9 as shown in
including ICT, to address through onsite/ face-to- COT rating sheets/ inter-
learning goals face/ in-person observer agreement forms #DIV/0!
(PPST 4.5.2) classroom observation.
Efficiency

Objective was met within


the allotted time
Basic 4. Assessment 10. Designed, selected, August 2022- 7.00% Classroom Observation Quality
Education and Reporting organized and used July 2023 Tool (COT) rating
Services diagnostic, formative and sheet/s or inter-observer Demonstrated Level 7 in
summative assessment agreement form/s done Objective 10 as shown in
strategies consistent with through onsite/ face-to- COT rating sheets/ inter-
curriculum requirements. face/ in-person observer agreement forms #DIV/0!
(PPST 5.1.2) classroom observation.
Efficiency

Objective was met within


the allotted time
MID-YEAR REVIEW/ RATING
WEIGHT
MFO KRAS OBJECTIVES TIMELINE MOV PERFORMANCE TARGET Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) MID-YEAR REVIEW RESULTS
PER KRA
Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Basic 4. Assessment 11. Monitored and August 2022- 7.00% Any one (1) of the following:
● Individual Learning Monitoring Plan
Quality
Education and Reporting evaluated learner July 2023 (ILMP)
● Peer assessment data
Services progress and ● Sample of learners’ output with Involved learner/s in
achievement using reflection/ self-assessment monitoring and evaluation
● Progress charts/ anecdotal records
learner attainment data. ● Class/ e-class record/ grading of their own progress and
(PPST 5.2.2) sheets
● Lesson plans showing index of
achievement
mastery #DIV/0!
● Frequency of errors with identified
least/ most mastered skills Timeliness
● Any equivalent ALS form/document
that highlights the objective (e.g.,
Individual Learning Agreement (ILA), Submitted MOV/s show/s
ALS Assessment Form 2)
● Others (Please specify and provide
monitoring and evaluation
annotations) done across 4 quarters

Basic 4. Assessment 12. Communicated August 2022- 7.00% Any one (1) of the following:
● A sample of corrected test paper of
Quality
Education and Reporting promptly and clearly the July 2023 a learner in a learning area with
parent’s or guardian’s signature and
Services learners’ needs, progress date of receipt Sustained engagement
and achievement to key ● Minutes of meetings with key through regular
stakeholders (e.g., PTA, SGC, SPT,
stakeholders, including CPC) with proof of attendance communication of learners’
parents/ guardians. ● Report card with parent’s or
guardian’s signature in all quarters
needs, progress and
(PPST 5.4.2) supported by minutes of meeting achievement to key
● Communication with key
stakeholders, including
stakeholders (e.g., parents/guardians,
co_x0002_teachers, LGU) using parents/guardians, as #DIV/0!
various modalities
● Anecdotal record showing entries shown in the MOV
per quarter submitted
● Any equivalent ALS form/document
that highlights the objective
● Others (Please specify and provide Timeliness
annotations)

Submitted MOV/s show/s


monitoring and evaluation
done across 4 quarters
Basic 5. Personal 13. Applied a personal August 2022- 7.00% A reflection/journal entry Quality
Education Growth and philosophy of teaching July 2023 that highlights the
Services Professional that is learner-centered. application of a Submitted MOV that
Development (PPST 7.1.2) learner_x0002_centered details the consistent
teaching involvement of learners in
philosophy in the lesson the teaching-learning
plan or community work process resulting from the
application of a personal
philosophy of teaching that #DIV/0!
is learner-centered
Timeliness

Applied a personal
philosophy of teaching that
is learner-centered across
4 quarters
MID-YEAR REVIEW/ RATING
WEIGHT
MFO KRAS OBJECTIVES TIMELINE MOV PERFORMANCE TARGET Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) MID-YEAR REVIEW RESULTS
PER KRA
Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Basic 5. Personal 14. Set professional August 2022- 7.00% 1. Certification from the Quality
Education Growth and development goals based July 2023 ICT Coordinator /
Services Professional on the Philippine School Head / Focal Updated professional
Development Professional Standards Person in charge of development goals during
for Teachers. e_x0002_SAT Phase II of the RPMS
(PPST 7.5.2) 2. IPCRF-DP Cycle as evidenced by
3. Mid-year Review MOV 4
Form (MRF) Efficiency
4. Updated IPCRF-DP Submitted 4 acceptable #DIV/0!
from Phase II MOVs
Timeliness

All four (4) submitted


MOVs were accomplished
within the prescribed
RPMS Phase
Basic 5. Plus Factor 15. Performed various August 2022- 2.00% Any one (1) proof of:
● committee involvement;
Quality
Education related works/activities July 2023 ● involvement as module/learning
material writer/validator;
Services that contribute to the ● involvement as a resource Performed at least one (1)
teaching-learning process person/speaker/learning facilitator in related work/ activity that
in the RO/SDO/school-initiated
TV/radio-based instruction; contributed to the teaching-
● book or journal authorship/ co- learning process beyond
authorship/contributorship;
● advisorship/ coordinatorship/ the school/ Community
chairpersonship; Learning Center (CLC) as
● participation in demonstration
teaching; evidenced by the submitted
● participation as research presenter MOV
in a forum/ conference;
● mentoring of pre-service/ in-service
teachers;
#DIV/0!
● conducted research within the Efficiency
rating period; Submitted
● others (please specify) with
annotation on how it contributed to the MOV that details the
teaching_x0002_learning process. achieved positive
contribution to the teaching-
learning process, as
Timeliness
evidenced by the
Submitted MOVs were
annotation provided.
distributed across 4
quarters
#DIV/0!
RATING FOR OVERALL ACCOMPLISHMENTS
ADJECTIVAL RATING EQUIVALENCES #DIV/0!
RANGE ADJECTIVAL RATING
4.500 - 5.000 Outstanding
3.500 - 4.499 Very Satisfactory
2.500 - 3.499 Satisfactory
1.500 - 2.499 Unsatisfactory
below 1.499 Poor
VENILYN APRIL A. BARRIENTOS CEFERINA T. CABAL CHELO C. TANGAN, EdD
Ratee Rater Approving Authority
MID-YEAR REVIEW FORM (MRF)
Name of Employee: VENILYN APRIL A. BARRIENTOS Name of Rater: CEFERINA T. CABAL
Position: TEACHER III Position: ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PRINCIPAL I
Bureau/ Center/ Service/ Division: BUREAU OF ELEMENTARY EDUCATION/MASI PRIMARY SCHOOL/PAMPLONA/CAGAYAN Date of Review: OCTOBER 2018
Rating Period: JUNE 2018-MARCH 2019

Mid-Year Review/ Rating


Weight
MFO KRAs Objectives Timeline per KRA MOV Performance Traget Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Mid-Year Review Results
Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Basic 1. Content 1. Applied knowledge June 2018- 7.50% - Classroom Quality
Education Knowledge of content within and March 2019 Observation Tool
Services and across curriculum (COT) Showed knowledge of
Pedagogy teaching areas. content and its
- Lesson plan integration within and
developed across subject areas as 5
highlighting shown in MOV 1 with a
integration of rating of 7
content within and
across curriculum
teaching areas
Efficiency

Submitted any 1 of the 2


given MOV
Timeliness
Basic 2. Used a range of June 2018- 7.50% - Classroom Quality
Education teaching strategies March 2019 Observation Tool Facilitated
Services that enhance learner (COT) using different teaching
achievement in literacy strategies that promote
and numeracy skills - Lesson plan reading, writing and/or
used in teaching numeracy skills as
highlighting learner- shown in MOV 1 with a 4
centered strategies rating of 6
that promote literacy
and numeracy skills

Efficiency

Submitted 1 learner-
centered lesson as 2
evidently shown in any
of the given MOV

Timeliness
Mid-Year Review/ Rating
Weight
MFO KRAs Objectives Timeline MOV Performance Traget Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Mid-Year Review Results
per KRA
Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Basic 3. Applied a range of June 2018- 7.50% - Classroom Quality
Education teaching strategies to March 2019 Observation Tool Used
Services develop critical and (COT) different teaching
creative thinking, as strategies that develop
well as other higher - Lesson plan critical and creative
order thinking skills used in teaching thinking and/or other 5
highlighting different HOTS as shown in MOV
teaching strategies 1 with a rating of 7
that develop critical
and creative thinking
and/ or other HOTS
Efficiency

2
Submitted 1 lesson as
evidenced by any 1 of
the given MOV
Timeliness
Basic 2. Learning 4. Managed classroom June 2018- 7.50% - Classroom Quality
Education Environment structure to engage March 2019 Observation Tool (COT) Used
Services and Diversity learners, individually classroom management
of Learners or in groups, in - strategies that engage
Lesson plan used in
meaningful teaching highlighting learners in activities/
exploration, discovery various classroom tasks as shown in MOV 4
and hands-on activities management strategies 1 with a rating of 6
within a range of that engage learners in
physical learning activities/ tasks in
environments different physical
learning environments
Efficiency

2
Submitted 1 lesson
supported by any of the
acceptable MOV
Timeliness
Basic 5. Managed learner June 2018- 7.50% Classroom observation tool (COT)
rating sheet about teacher
Quality
Education behavior March 2019 management of learner behavior
using the following strategies:
Services constructively by 1. Providing Applied teacher
applying positive and motivation 2. management strategies of
Praising the learners/Giving learner behavior that
non-violent discipline positive feedback
to ensure 3. Setting house promote positive and 4
learningfocused
rules/guidelines non-violent discipline as
4. Ensuring
shown in MOV submitted
environments. learners’ active participation
5. with a rating of 6
Allowing learners to express their
ideas/opinions
6. Giving equal
opportunities to learners
7. Efficiency
Encouraging learners to ask
questions
Submitted any 1 of the
8. Others (Please specify
and provide annotations given strategies as 2
observed in only 1
lesson
6. Giving equal
opportunities to learners
7.
Encouraging learners to ask
questions

8. Others (Please specify


and provide annotations Mid-Year Review/ Rating
Weight
MFO KRAs Objectives Timeline MOV Performance Traget Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Mid-Year Review Results
per KRA
Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Timeliness
Basic 6. Used differentiated, June 2018- 7.50% - Classroom observation Quality
Education developmentally March 2019 tool (COT) rating sheet
about using differentiated,
Services appropriate learning developmentally Applied differentiated
experiences to address appropriate learning teaching strategies to
learners’ gender, experiences address learner 4
needs, strengths, - Lesson diversity as shown in
interests and plans/modified DLLs MOV 1 with a rating of
developed highlighting
experiences. differentiation in content, 6
product, process, learning
environment or others Efficiency
according to learners’
gender, needs, strengths,
interests and experiences Submitted any 1
differentiated teaching
strategy in only 1
lesson as evidently 2
shown in any 1 of the
acceptable MOV

Timeliness
Basic 3. Curriculum 7. Planned, managed June 2018- 7.50% - Classroom Quality
Education and Planning and implemented March 2019 observation tool Planned
Services developmentally (COT) rating sheet and implemented
sequenced teaching about using developmentally
and learning processes developmentally sequenced teaching
to meet curriculum sequenced teaching and learning process as 4
requirements and and learning process shown in MOV 1 with a
varied teaching - rating of 6
contexts Lesson
plans/modified DLLs
highlighting
developmentally Efficiency
sequenced
instruction that meet Submitted 1
curriculum goals and developmentally
varied teaching sequenced teaching
contexts and learning process as 2
evidently shown in any
1 of the given MOV

Timeliness
Mid-Year Review/ Rating
Weight
MFO KRAs Objectives Timeline MOV Performance Traget Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Mid-Year Review Results
per KRA
Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Basic 8. Participated in June 2018- 7.50% Personal notes of Quality
Education collegial discussions March 2019 teachers on
Services that use teacher and LACs/FGDs/meetings Consistently
learner feedback to with proof of participated in
enrich teaching attendance LACs/FGDs/ meetings
practice to discuss
Minutes of LAC/FGD teacher/learner 5
sessions on use of feedback to enrich
teacher and learner instruction as shown in
feedback to enrich the MOV submitted
teaching practice
with proof of
attendance
Efficiency

Participated in 2
LACs/FGDs/ meetings
as evidently shown in 3
any 1 of the given MOV

Timeliness
Basic 9. Selected, developed, June 2018- 7.50% - Classroom observation Quality
Education organized and used March 2019 tool (COT) rating sheet
about using appropriate
Services appropriate teaching teaching and learning Developed and used
and learning resources, including ICT varied teaching and
resources, including Examples: learning resources,
ICT, to address  Activity including ICT, to
sheets/task sheets/work 5
learning goals sheets
address learning goals
 PowerPoint as shown in MOV 1
presentations with a rating of 7
 Video clips

 Module
Efficiency
 SIMs-Strategic
Intervention Materials  Submitted at
Others
least 4 varied teaching
- Lesson and learning resources,
plans/modified DLLs with including ICT, as
appropriate instructional evidently shown in 5
materials appended 3
MOV 1 and supported
by any 1 of the
acceptable MOV

Timeliness
Mid-Year Review/ Rating
Weight
MFO KRAs Objectives Timeline MOV Performance Traget Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Mid-Year Review Results
per KRA
Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Basic 4. 10. Designed, selected, June 2018- 7.50% - Classroom Quality
Education Assessment organized and used March 2019 observation tool (COT)
Services and diagnostic, formative rating sheet about Designed, selected,
Reporting and summative using diagnostic, organized and used
formative and
assessment strategies summative assessment diagnostic, formative
consistent with strategies and summative
curriculum - assessment strategies
requirements. Prepared lesson consistent with 5
plans/modified DLLs curriculum
highlighting requirements as shown
appropriate use of in MOV 1 with a rating
formative assessment of 7
strategies

Efficiency

Submitted 1
assessment tool as 2
evidently shown in any
of the acceptable MOV

Timeliness
Basic 11. Monitored and June 2018- 7.50% - Compilation of a Quality
Education evaluated learner March 2019 learner’s written work Consistently
Services progress and with summary of monitored and
achievement using results and with evaluated learner
signature of parents
learner attainment progress and
data - Formative/ achievement using
5
summative assessment learner attainment data
tools with TOS and as shown in the MOV
frequency of errors submitted
with identified least
mastered skills
- Class records/grading
sheets Efficiency
- Submitted a
Lesson plans/modified combination of at least
DLLs showing index of 4 of the acceptable 5
mastery MOV

Timeliness
Submitted
MOV were distributed 3
across 2 quarters
Mid-Year Review/ Rating
Weight
MFO KRAs Objectives Timeline MOV Performance Traget Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Mid-Year Review Results
per KRA
Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Basic 12.Communicated June 2018- 7.50% 1. At least 3 samples of Quality
Education promptly and clearly March 2019 corrected test papers of
Services the learners’ needs, the same 3 learners in Consistently showed
progress and the same learning area prompt and clear
with parents’ or
achievement to key guardians’ signature communication of the
stakeholders, including and date of receipt learners’ needs,
parents/ guardians. progress and
2. Minutes of PTA achievement to key
meetings or Parent- stakeholders, including 5
Teacher conferences in parents/ guardians as
all quarters with proof shown in the MOV
of parents’/guardians’ submitted
attendance
3. Report cards
with parent’s or
guardian’s signature in
all quarters supported Efficiency
by minutes of meeting Submitted
a combination of at
4. 5
Communication with least 4 of the
parents/ guardians acceptable MOV
using various
modalities
Timeliness

Submitted MOV were 3


distributed across 2
quarters
Basic 5. Plus Factor 13. Performed various June 2018- 7.50% 1. Certificate of Quality
Education related March 2019 Recognition or
Services works/activities that Participation Consistently performed
contribute to the 2. various related
teaching-learning Certificate of Training work/activities that
process contribute to the
3. Certificate teaching learning 5
of Speakership process as shown in the
4. MOV submitted
Coordinatorship/
Chairpersons hip

5. Coaching and Efficiency


mentoring learners in
competitions Submitted at least 4 5
different kinds of
acceptable MOV
Timeliness

RATING FOR OVERALL ACCOMPLISHMENTS

ADJECTIVAL RATING EQUIVALENCES


RANGE ADJECTIVAL RATING
Mid-Year Review/ Rating
Weight
MFO KRAs Objectives Timeline MOV Performance Traget Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Mid-Year Review Results
per KRA
Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
4.500 - 5.000 Outstanding
3.500 - 4.499 Very Satisfactory
2.500 - 3.499 Satisfactory
1.500 - 2.499 Unsatisfactory
below 1.499 Poor

VENILYN APRIL A. BARRIENTOS CEFERINA T. CABAL CEFERINA T. CABAL


Ratee Rater Approving Authority

You might also like