Final Na To Sana Final Na Nga To

VALENZUELA CITY POLYTECHNIC COLLEGE i
Kamagong Street Fortune Village Parada Valenzuela

City
6-IN-1 RETRACTABLE MASON AND

CARPENTRY TOOL
A Technological Research
Presented to the Faculty
of
The Formal Education Department
Valenzuela City Polytechnic
College
In Partial Fulfillment
of the Requirements of the Degree
Bachelor of Technical Teacher
Education Major in Civil Technology
Balagot, Klien A.
Borlagdan, Bjorn B.
Fernandez, Alvin John
M. Mercenes, Jerome B.
Rojas, Arnold A.
Velez, Joshua S.
2022
i
VALENZUELA CITY POLYTECHNIC COLLEGE
APPROVAL SHEET
This technological research entitled “6-IN-1 RETRACTABL MASON

AND CARPENTRY TOOL” is prepared and submitted by Klien A.
Balagot, Bjorn B. Borlagdan, Alvin John M. Fernandez, Arnold A. Rojas,
Jerome B. Mercenes, and Joshua S. Velez in partial fulfillment of the
requirements for the degree Bachelor of Technical Teacher Education
Major in Civil Technology has been examined and is recommended for
oral examination.
MS. MARY GRACE R. MAGANA

Research Adviser
Approved in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree

Bachelor of Technical Teacher Education Major in Civil Technology by the
committee in an oral examination with a grade of on .
DR. DONATO S. GALLEGO

Chairman
ENGR. FLORINO T. OIGA MS. MARY JOY I. TIVIDAD

Member Member
MS. MARY GRACE R. MAGANA

Coordinator
Accepted and approved in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the

degree Bachelor of Technical Teacher Education Major in Civil Technology.
DR. MARICEL F. MAURICIO DR. YOLANDA G. GADON

College Dean College Administrator
i
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The researchers would like to express them gratitude to the following
individuals for the unwavering support and assistance that they extended to
accomplish this research:
The parents & relatives, who never gave up and kept on encouraging
them to exceed the limit and the financial support who served to be the
backbone of this research.
The friends, who assisted and provided them either a moral or financial
support.
The respondents and participants of the study, Would like to say the
warmest thank you for giving their best to answer the survey questioner and
taking time to provide the necessary answers and providing theirinformation.
The research adviser, Ms. Mary Grace R. Magana, for her untiring
support and sleepless night in providing all the needs and assistance.
Ms. Mary Grace R. Magana, for believing, supporting and trusting them
this study will become successful and for all the words of encouragement
and advice.
The Chairman of the panel, Dr. Donato S. Gallego, for his assistance,
knowledge, support, and suggestions especially during the oral defense.

i
The Grammarian, Ms. Mary Joy I. Tividad, for her suggestions in improving
the manuscript and ensuring that they know what they are doing.
The Statistician, Engr. Florino T. Oiga, for the support and knowledge that
he shared with them and for verifying the statistical aspect during the oral
defense.
The College Dean, Dr. Maricel F. Mauricio, and Acting College President,
Dr. Yolanda G. Gadon, for the encouragement and guidance that provide during
this research.
And Above all, to Almighty God, for the gift of knowledge, wisdom,
determination and for guiding and blessing them to accomplish this study.
KAB
BB B
AJMF
JBM
AAR
JSV
v
Title: 6-in-1 Retractable Mason and Carpentry Tool.
Researchers: Balagot, Klien A.

Borlagdan, Bjorn B.
Fernandez, Alvin John
M. Mercenes, Jerome B.
Rojas, Arnold A.
Velez, Joshua S.
Adviser: Ms. Mary Grace R. Magana
Course: Bachelor of Technical Teacher Education Major

in Civil Technology
Year: 2022
ABSTRACT
This study focused on the level of acceptability of 6-in-1 Retractable
Mason and Carpentry Tool. There were fifty respondents composed of
carpenters and masons from Barangay Parada and Barangay Mapulang Lupa,
Valenzuela City. The study employed experimental and descriptive methods.
The statistical tools used were: percentage, weighted mean, and chi-square in
the analysis of gathered data. The findings of the study showed that the product
in terms of affordability, durability, and portability were accepted by the
respondents. The test of hypothesis showed that the computed value was less
than the tabular value hence, the null hypothesis was accepted, which means
v
that there is no significant difference in the level of acceptability of 6-in-1
Retractable Mason and Carpentry Tool as perceived by the respondents when
their demographic profile is considered such as age and year of experience.
The study concluded that the 6-in-1 Retractable Mason and Carpentry Tool was
accepted together with findings of no significant difference in the level of
acceptability of the product as perceived by the respondents.

v
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PRELIMINARIES PAGE
Title Page.........................................................................................................................i
Approval Sheet................................................................................................................ii
Acknowledgement..........................................................................................................iii
Abstract............................................................................................................................v
Table of Contents...........................................................................................................vii
List of Appendices..........................................................................................................ix
List of Tables...................................................................................................................ix
List of Figures..................................................................................................................x
CHAPTER I: THE PPROBLEM AND ITS BACKGROUND AND REVIEW OF

THE RELATED LITERATURE STUDIES
Introduction..........................................................................................................1
Conceptual Framework......................................................................................3
Paradigm of the Study........................................................................................4
Statement of the Problem..................................................................................4
Hypothesis of the Study.....................................................................................5
Significance of the Study...................................................................................5
Scope and Delimitation.......................................................................................6
Review of Related Literature and Studies.......................................................6
Foreign Literature.....................................................................................6
Foreign Studies........................................................................................7
Local Literature........................................................................................7
Local Studies............................................................................................8
Definition of Terms..............................................................................................9
CHAPTER II: METHODOLOGY

Research Design................................................................................................10
Research Locale.................................................................................................11
Samples and Sampling Technique..................................................................12
Respondents of the Study.................................................................................12
Instrumentation...................................................................................................13
Data Gathering Procedure................................................................................13
Statistical Treatment of Data............................................................................16
CHAPTER III: PRESENTATION, ANALYSIS, AND INTERPRETATION OF DATA

Demographic profile of the respondents........................................................18
The Level of Acceptability of 6-in-1 Retractable Mason and Carpentry tool
as perceived by the respondents in terms of Affordability, Durability, and
Portability.............................................................................................................19
The Significant Difference on the Level of 6-in-1 Retractable Mason and
Carpentry tool in terms of Affordability, Durability and Portability when
v
demographic profile is considered...................................................................20
CHAPTER IV: SUMMARY FINDINGS, CONCLUSION AND

RECOMMENDATIONS
Summary of Findings.........................................................................................23
Conclusions..........................................................................................................25
Recommendations..............................................................................................25
BIBLIOGRAPHY............................................................................................................26
APPENDICES................................................................................................................29
CURRICULUM VITAE...................................................................................................63
i
List of Appendices
Appendix A. Request Letter........................................................................................30
Appendix B. Survey Questionnaire............................................................................34
Appendix C. Certificate of Grammar Checking........................................................35
Appendix D. Certificate of Statistical Computation Checking................................36
Appendix E. Distribution of the Respondents according to Age............................37
Appendix F. Distribution of the Respondents according to Years of Work
Experience.......................................................................................................................38
Appendix G. Summary of Tally in Distribution of the Respondents in
terms of Affordability as to Age.............................................................39
Appendix H. Summary of Tally in Distribution of the Respondents in
terms of Affordability as to Years of Work Experience.....................41
Appendix I. Summary of Tally in Distribution of the Respondents in
terms of Durability as to Age................................................................43
Appendix J. Summary of Tally in Distribution of the Respondents in
terms of Durability as to Years of Work Experience.........................45
Appendix K. Summary of Tally in Distribution of the Respondents in
terms of Portability as to Age...............................................................47
Appendix L. Summary of Tally in Distribution of the Respondents in
terms of Portability as to Years of Work Experience........................49
Appendix M. Chi-Computed Based on Affordability as to Years of Work
…...............................................................................................................51
Appendix N. Chi-Computed Based on Affordability as to Age..............................53
Appendix O. Chi-Computed Based on Durability as to Years of Work Experience
…..............................................................................................................55
Appendix P. Chi-Computed Based on Durability as to Age..................................57
Appendix Q. Chi-Computed Based on Portability as to Years of Work
Experience..............................................................................................59
Appendix R. Chi-Computed Based on Portability as to Age.................................61
List of Tables
Table 1.1: Distribution of the Respondents according Age.....................................18
Table 1.2: Distribution of the Respondents according Years of Work Experience
…………………………….………………………………………………..18
Table 2.0: Summary of the level of acceptability of 6-in-1 Retractable Mason and
Carpentry tool as perceived by the respondents...................................19
Table 3.1: Significant difference on the level of acceptability of 6-in-1 Retractable
Mason and Carpentry tools perceived by the respondents in terms of
Age................................................................................................................20
Table 3.2: Significant difference on the level of acceptability of 6-in-1 Retractable
Mason and Carpentry tool as perceived by the respondents in terms
of Years of Work Experience.....................................................................21
Table 4.1: Distribution of the respondents according to Age..................................37
Table 4.2: Distribution of the respondents according to Years of Work Experience
x
………………………………….………………………………………...…38
Table 5.1: Summary of tally according to Age in terms of Affordability.................39

Table 5.2: Summary of tally according to Years of Work Experience in terms of
Affordability...................................................................................................41
Table 5.3: Summary of tally according to Age in terms of Durability.....................43
Durability.......................................................................................................45
Table 5.5: Summary of tally according to Age in terms of Portability....................47
Portability.....................................................................................................49
Table 6.1: Chi-Square Test of the Respondents Profile as to Age in terms of
Affordability..................................................................................................51
Table 6.2: Chi-Square Test of the Respondents Profile as to Years of Work
Experience in terms of Affordability........................................................53
Durability.........................................................................................................................55
Experience in terms of Durability.............................................................57
Portability.....................................................................................................59
Experience in terms of Portability.............................................................61
List of Figures
Figure 1: The Paradigm of the Study............................................................................3
Figure 2.1: Vicinity Map of the Respondents of Barangay Mapulang Lupa..........11
Figure 2.2: Vicinity Map of the Respondents of Barangay Parada.........................11
Figure 2.3: Materials and Procedure in Constructing the Product.........................14
Figure 2.4: Product Design...........................................................................................15
1
Kamagong Street Fortune 6 Village Parada
CHAPTER I
THE PROBLEM AND ITS BACKGROUND AND REVIEW OF RELATED

LITERATURE AND STUDIES
Introduction
In the modern era, there are many inventions that either could help or harm the
human population. It is very difficult for people to create or express something useful
but because of the collaboration and careful analysis, the researchers have
developed a 6-in-1 Retractable Masonry and Carpentry Tool.
According to Gallantry's Buyer's Guide (2016). Multi-tools are tremendous for
their ability to offer a number of simple and effective solutions to everyday problems.
Most come with a variety of functions and some can even be adapted to use their
included solutions in unusual ways if you’ve got a bit of imagination. While they may
not be the best thing to use for complex work, they can competently handle the more
common small jobs. Emergencies cannot always be predicted. That’s part of what
makes them emergencies. The most you can do is prepare for the worst and hope
for the best. And keeping a multi-tool on hand is a pretty good step in the right
direction. A multi-tool can be the difference between peril and success.
The researcher develop the product to assist the workers, specifically construction
workers, masons, and carpenters. Carrying too many heavy tools can lead to
hazards such as numbness at work and accidents. Every time and day, they perform
a different task, and it will be useful to have a tool that can perform multiple tasks
without bringing too many tools. The construction workers, carpenters and masons
use hammers, chisels, and nails for woodworking at times, but have they ever
imagine having all of those tools in just one or two items without feeling numb or
worrying about forgetting some of the tools? Having multiple tools without having to
2
worry about weight and price is a benefit of our product that most potential workers
will appreciate. Why would they buy bulky products when they can have one for a
very low price that is also very easy to carry and use on the go? This will encourage
our fellow Filipinos to have a complete set of tools without having to worry.
3
Conceptual Framework
The flow of the study is shown in the paradigm below:
INPUT
1. Demographic profile of Process OUTPUT
the respondents in terms First, creating a Survey A 6-in-1 Retractable
Questionnaire. Mason and Carpentry
of:
Second, conducting the tool
1.1. Age survey.
1.2. Years of experience Third, conduct
experimental Analysis.
Last, analysis and
2. The level of interpretation.
acceptability of 6-in-1
Retractable Mason and
Carpentry tool in terms
of:
2.1 Durability
2.2 Affordability
2.3 Portability
3. Is there any significant

difference on the level of
acceptability of 6-in-1
Retractable Mason and
Carpentry tool to the
other multi-purpose tools?
Figure 1. Research Paradigm

4
PARADIGM OF THE STUDY
The paradigm of the study consists of the Input box, process box, and output
box.
The input box contains the demographic profile of the respondents in terms of
age, and years of work experience. It includes the level of acceptability of 6-in-1
Retractable Mason and Carpentry tool as perceived by the respondents in terms of
durability, affordability, and portability; and the significant difference in the level of
acceptability of 6-in-1 Retractable Mason and Carpentry tool as perceived by the
respondents when their profile is considered.
The process box contains the Survey, Experimental Analysis, and
Assessment of data gathered, analysis, and interpretation
The last box is the output box, which is the 6-in-1 Retractable Mason and
Carpentry tool.
STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM
In this study, researchers aim and to use the 6-in-1 Retractable Mason and
Carpentry tool in decreasing weight of construction tools
Specifically, it sought to answer to the following questions.
1. What is the demographic profile of the respondents in terms of:
1.1. Age
1.2. Years of work experience
2. What is the level of acceptability of 6-in-1 Retractable Mason and Carpentry
tool in terms of:
2.1. Durability
2.2. Affordability
2.3. Portability
5
3. Is there any significant difference in the level of acceptability of 6-in-1 Retractable
Mason and Carpentry tool to the other multi-purpose tools?
HYPOTHESIS OF THE STUDY
There is no significant difference in 6-in-1 Retractable Mason and Carpentry
tool in terms of Age, and years of experience when demographic profiles of the
respondents are considered.
SIGNIFICANCE OF THE STUDY
The study will give information about the 6-in-1 Retractable Mason and
Carpentry tool. The result of the study will benefit the following:
Construction Workers - For them to gain knowledge about other multi-
purpose tool and the benefits they could get in using it. Having the right tools at work
should be a standard nowadays, but there are a lot of workers in the workplaces that fail to
do so. To bring awareness to the importance of tools and work equipment, the researchers
have decided to make multi-purpose tools that will help the workers to minimize their work.
Civil Technology Students - To be knowledgeable to the tools they have not
encounter or use yet. They can gain information on what the tools can do in their
field.
Future Researchers - The ideas presented may serve as a resource for future
researchers whose study is in connection of A 6-in-1 Retractable Mason and
Carpentry tool.
6
SCOPE AND DELIMITATION
The intent of this study is to determine the level of acceptability of 6-in-1
Retractable Mason and Carpentry Tool (RMCT) as perceived by the respondents.
The study was undertaken at Valenzuela City Polytechnic College. The respondents
of the study were the 50 employees of (specific company).
The descriptive and experimental research designs were used in this study. It
also used statistical tools to examine the data in the study, such as percentage,
weighted mean, and chi-square . During the School Year 2022-2023, the research
was carried out.
REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE AND STUDIES
This chapter presents literature related to the study taken from foreign and
local sources which gave light to the conduct of the study.
FOREIGN LITERATURE
According to Mahoney (2021), multi-tool is easier to use and carry because it’s
unburdened by an abundance of rarely used tools. It’s like keeping a flashlight in
your pocket: If you don’t carry one, you can’t imagine ever using it, but once you
have it, you use it seven times a day.
According to Hongquan, (2014), to solve technical problem improving operating
efficiency and reduce costs, a ratchet screwdriver for two way work doing is
significance. This screwdriver comprises knife bar, handle, and bi-directional
transmission device, reversing arrangement. It is relevant to the study because it is
about multi-purpose tool and to minimize the tools they are handling.
Described bidirectional transmission device comprises axis, and is arranged on two

7
ratchet-gear wheels on axis, two driven wheels. One of them ratchet-gear wheel and
a driven wheel and axis synchronous axial system another ratchet-gear wheel and
another driven wheel can central axis relatively and two driven wheels are connected
by primary transmission gear drive. This ratchet screwdriver has relative use to the
product, 6-in-1retactable multi-purpose mason and carpentry tool, this tool have
different kinds of uses like nail pulling, surface scraping, shape and carve. Also, to
make their time efficient since they are using multi purpose tool which is hassle free
and effective.
FOREIGN STUDY
According to Montem (2018), Multi-tools keep everything together and prevent a
person from losing any of the individual items, it is easy to access and use.
Multi-tools eliminate the need to select and purchase separate tools.
According to Wetzel (2017), Hand tools in the construction industry
are specifically designed to aid in the execution of a task through manual operation.
The large variety of these instruments and their uses are evident throughout the
construction process. Preferences on tool types for a specific task and perceived
usage of a tool may vary based on the discipline of the user.
LOCAL LITERATURE
According to KYK Tools Blog, (March, 2018), for homeowners who often spice
up the overall aesthetic of their home, or those who just want to do a repair and
installation work themselves, having the perfect power tools from the Philippines is a
blessing. Power tools from the Philippines should also be called as “Miracle Tools”
because various home-related projects can be easily and efficiently accomplished

8
through their aid.
According to KYK Tools Blog, (March, 2018), in today’s world, more and more
people are rediscovering the practical benefits of learning to build and fix things with
their own hands. Various power tools in the Philippines are found in almost every
household, varying in size, shape, material, and purpose. It goes without saying that
storing these tools properly is just as important as using them correctly.
The first evident point is that with proper storage, these tools would always be
convenient and easy to access. Power tools in the Philippines require systems of
regulative maintenance in order to make sure they last and stay fully functional.
Depending on the tools and what space you have to work with, there are many
simple procedures that can be followed to maximize your storage.
LOCAL STUDY
According to Offgrid Staff in Gear (2013), the more functions a tool has and less
weight and space it takes up, the more useful it is. It is also makes up for in mobility,
storage space requirements, and hidden tools.

9
DEFINITION OF TERMS
The following terms are operationally defined for better understanding
Innovation - A method of bringing new ideas, products, or procedures to the
public's attention.
Kit - A set of equipment, materials or tools needed for a multiple purposes.
Multipurpose - Having multiple functions or purposes.
Multi-tool - It is a hand tool that combines several individual functions in a
single unit.
Retractable - Able to be drawn, remove, replace or put back or back in.
Threaded Pipe - A pipe with screw-threaded ends for assembly or connecting
to different equipment, tools or materials.

1
CHAPTER II
METHODOLOGY
This chapter presents the research locale, respondents of the study, sample,
and sampling techniques, instrumentation, data gathering procedure, and statistical
treatment of data.
Research Design
The researchers used the experimental and descriptive methods in this study.
The acceptability of this method is to conduct the study and the statistical data of the
research.
Experimental study is a blueprint of the procedure that enables the researcher
to test his hypothesis by reaching valid conclusions about relationships between
independent and dependent variables. It refers to the conceptual framework within
which the experiment is conducted.
Descriptive research can be explained as statement of affairs as they are at
present with the researcher having no control over variable. Moreover, descriptive
research maybe characterized as simply the attempt to determine, describe or
identify what is, while analytical research attempts to establish why it is that way or
how it come to be.

1
Research Locale
The study was conducted in Barangay Parada, Valenzuela City where
Valenzuela City Polytechnic College is located.
Valenzuela City Polytechnic College traces its roots to the Valenzuela
Manpower Training Center (VMTC) that offers an array and wide several technical
courses. It was established in 1982 to provide quality technical education, accessible
to all talented, gifted and creative graduates of secondary schools, out-of-school
youths and unemployed adults in Valenzuela City.
Figure 2.1 Vicinity Map of the Respondents of Barangay Parada
Figure 2.2 Vicinity Map of the Respondents of Barangay Mapulang Lupa

1
Respondents of the Study

The respondents of the study were twenty-five (25) masons and/or carpenters
of Barangay Parada and twenty-five (25) masons and/or carpenter of Barangay
Mapulang Lupa, Valenzuela City.
The researchers chose the masons and/or carpenter to be the respondents of
the study because they were knowledgeable in the product and they can give the
data we needed for the study.
Sample and Sampling Technique
The researchers used purposive sampling procedure for selecting the
participants in this study. Purposive sampling technique is focused on the
judgment of the researchers based on the characteristic of a population relation
to the objective of the study. It is a functional technique since the research is
focused on understanding and identifying the acceptability of the 6-in-1 Mason and
Carpentry tool.
The samples of this research were fifty (50) masons and/or carpenters in
Barangay Parada and Barangay Mapulang Lupa, those who are experts in the field
of construction and masonry. The researchers chose them as the respondents
because they are reliable, already engaged in the experience of the system in
construction. The researchers believed that using this sampling technique will
provide the most accurate information to achieve the objective of this study which is
to determine the acceptability of the 6-in-1 Retractable Mason and Carpentry tool.
1
Research Instrument
The researchers used the survey questionnaire as the main instrument of the
study with the sampling product to determine the perception of the respondents.
Questionnaire is a fact-finding survey and with adequate interpretation is fitted in
gathering data regarding the conditions.
The questionnaires were used to gather data from the respondents to
determine the level of acceptability of 6-in-1 Retractable Mason and Carpentry tool in
terms of affordability and durability.
The criteria indicated to rate the product is the Likert scale, in terms of
affordability and durability of the product.
Gathering Procedure
The researcher will underwent the following procedure in collecting
data and information: The researchers secured a permit from the
administration through the Dean’s Office to conduct a survey. The researchers will
secure a permit from Barangay Captain and from different Barangays. The product
was presented to the respondents, using a survey questionnaire, the respondent will
rate and review the product. The gathered data from the survey questionnaires were
recorded, tallied, tabulated and evaluated carefully to come up with an accurate
results.
1
MATERIALS AND PROCEDURE IN CONSTRUCTING THE PRODUCT
The design and construction of the 6-in-1 Retractable Mason and Carpentry
tool
Figure 2.3 6-in-1 Retractable Mason and Carpentry tool.
Materials and Method Employed

Description Quantity Price (Php) Cost
Claw hammer 1PC 90 90
Chisel 1/2 1PC 130 130
Chisel 3/4 1PC 130 130
Chisel 1 1PC 130 130
Cold chisel 1PC 60 60
diamond pointed
Metal pipe 1PC 120 120
Ball hammer 1PC 60 60
Total 720
1
PROCEDURE OF MAKING THE PRODUCT
1. Prepare materials.
2. Get the heads of the preferred tools.
3. Attach threads to each head.
4. Cut a pipe.
5. Attach the lower part of the pipe to the head of each tools
Product Design
Figure 2.4 Product Design

1
Statistical Treatment
The research study used the following statistical tools: percentage, mean,
weighted mean, chi-square test, and Likert scale.
Percentage- The use of percentage distribution was employed to find the answers to
the questionnaire checklist profile formula.
Formula:
P= f
n x 100
Where:
P= Percentage
f = frequency of respondents
n = total number of respondents
Mean – refers to the average that is used to derive the central tendency of data in
question
Formula:
Where:
X = mean
= total sum of the product of x and

frequency n = given sample data
1
Weighted Mean = weighted average is a mean calculated by giving values in a
data set more influence according to some attitude of the data.
Formula: WM = TWF/N
Where:
WM= Weighted Mean
TWF= total weighted frequency
N = Total number of respondents
Chi-Square Test = the Chi-Square statistic is commonly used for
testing relationships between categorical variables. The null hypothesis of the Chi-
Square test is that no relationship exists on the categorical variables in the
population; they are independent.
Formula:
Where:
Chi-square test
O = Grand total observed frequency
E = total product of frequency

1
CHAPTER III
PRESENTATION, ANALYSIS, AND INTERPRETATION OF DATA
This chapter contains the survey and result of the test in terms of
Affordability,Durability, and Portability when the demographic profile of the
respondents is considered.
1. The Demographic Profiles of the Respondents
Table 1.1
Distributions of the respondents by Age
Age Frequency Percentage
21-29 11 22%
30-38 21 42%
39-47 12 24%
48-56 5 10%
57-65 1 2%
Total 50 100%
Table 1.1 shows the distribution of the respondents according to age.
Age 21-29 got a frequency of 11, equivalent to 22%, age 30-38 got a
frequency of 21, equivalent to 42%, age 39-47 got a frequency of 12, equivalent to
24%, age 48- 56 got a frequency of 5, equivalent to 10%, and age 57-65 got a
frequency 1 equivalent to 2%.
Based on the data presented in table 1.1, majority of respondents subjected
to the study were from the ages of 30-38 while the least number of respondents are
aged 57-65.
The data show that most respondents are adults.
Table 1.2
Distribution of the Respondents as to
Work Experience
Years of Work Frequency Percentage

Experience
2-7 29 58%
8-13 16 32%
14-19 2 4%
1
20-25 0 0%
26-31 3 6%
Total 50 100%
Table 1.2 Shows the distribution of the respondents according to years of experience
Majority of the respondents belong to 2-7 years of experience which got a

frequency of 29, equivalent to 58%, 8-13 years of experience got a frequency of 16,
equivalent to 32%, 14-19 years of experience got a frequency of 2, equivalent to 4%,
20-25 years of experience got a frequency of 0, equivalent to 0%, and 26-31 years
of experience got a frequency 3, equivalent to 6%.
Based on the data presented in Table 1.2, Majority of respondents subjected
to the study were have a experience of 2-7 years while the least number of
respondents have the years of work experience of 20-25.
2. The level of Acceptability of 6-IN-1 Retractable Mason and Carpentry Tool as

perceived by the respondents in terms of: Affordability, Durability, and
Portability.
Table 2.0
Presents the summary of the level of acceptability of 6-in-1 Retractable

Mason and Carpentry Tool
Indicators Average Weighted Verbal Interpretation

Mean
Affordability 4.36 Acceptable
Durability 4.48 Acceptable
Portability 4.41 Highly Acceptable
Total 4.45 Acceptable
The indicator Affordability obtained a 4.36 average weighted mean which was
interpreted as acceptable. The indicator Durability obtained a 4.48 average weighted
mean which was interpreted as acceptable. The indicator Portability obtained a 4.51
average weighted mean which was interpreted as acceptable. The result shows that
the level of acceptability of 6-in-1 Retractable Mason and Carpentry Tool is
acceptable as perceived by the respondents.
2
3. Significant different in the level of acceptability of 6-IN-1 Retractable Mason

and Carpentry Tool in terms of Affordability and Durability when the
Demographic Profile is Considered
Table 3.1
Significant difference in the level of acceptability of 6-IN-1 Retractable

Mason and Carpentry Tool as perceived by the respondents in terms
of Age
Indicator DF Chi-square Chi-square Decision Significance

(x2) (x2) Tabular on
Computed Value Ho
Value @0.05
Affordability 12 3.833 21.026 Accept Ho Not Significant
Durability 12 3.1723 21.026 Accept Ho Not Significant
Portability 12 5.806 21.026 Accept Ho Not Significant
Table 3.1 shows the significant difference in the level of acceptability of 6-IN-1
Retractable Mason and Carpentry Tool as perceived by the respondents when their
age is considered.
Affordability obtained a chi-square computed value of 3.833 with the degree of
12 and a tabular value of 21.026 at 0.05 level of significance. Since the computed
value was less than the tabular value, the decision was to accept the null hypothesis.
There was no significant difference in the level of acceptability of 6-IN-1 Retractable
Mason and Carpentry Tool as perceived by the respondents when their age was
considered.
Durability obtained a chi-square computed value of 3.1723 with the degree of
There was no significant difference on the level of acceptability of 6-IN-1 Retractable
Mason and Carpentry Tool as perceived by the respondents when their age was
considered
2
Portability obtained a chi-square computed value of 5.806 with the degree of

There was no significant difference on the level of acceptability
of 6-IN-1 Retractable Mason and Carpentry Tool as perceived by the respondents
when their age was considered
Table 3.2
Significant difference in the level of acceptability of 6-IN-1 Retractable Mason
and Carpentry Tool as perceived by the respondents in terms of Years of
work experience
Indicator DF Chi-square Chi-square Decision Significance

(x2) (x2) Tabular on
Computed Value @0.05 Ho
Value
Affordability 12 1.699 21.026 Accept Ho Not Significant
Durability 12 2.052 21.026 Accept Ho Not Significant
Portability 12 1.760 21.026 Accept Ho Not Significant

Mason and Carpentry Tool as perceived by the respondents when the years of work
experience was considered.
There was no significant difference in the level of acceptability
of 6-IN-1 Retractable Mason and Carpentry Tool as perceived by the respondents
when the years of work experience was considered.
2

2
CHAPTER IV
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION
This chapter presents the summary of findings, conclusions and

recommendations.
Summary of Findings
The main focus of the study was to determine the level of acceptability of
6- in-1 retractable mason and carpentry tool.
1. The Demographic Profiles of the Respondents
Ages 21-29 got a frequency of 11, equivalent to 22%, ages 30-38 got a
frequency of 22, equivalent to 44%, age 39-47 got a frequency of 12, equivalent to
24%, age 48- 56 got a frequency of 4, equivalent to 10%, and age 57-65 got a
frequency 1 equivalent to 2%.
Based on the data presented in Table 1.1, majority of the respondents
subjected to the study were from the ages of 30-38 while the least number of
respondents are aged 57-65.
The data show that most of respondents are adults.
2-7 years of experience got a frequency of 29, equivalent to 58%, 8-13 years
of experience got a frequency of 16, equivalent to 32%, 14-19 years of experience
got a frequency of 2, equivalent to 4%, 20-25 years of experience got a frequency
of 0, equivalent to 0%, and 26-31 years of experience got a frequency 3, equivalent
to 6%.
Based on the data presented in table 1.2, Majority of respondents subjected
to the study were have a experience of 2-7 years while the least number of
respondents are have the years of experience of 20-25.
2. The level of Acceptability of 6-IN-1 Retractable Mason and Carpentry Tool

as perceived by the respondents in terms of: Affordability, Durability, and
Portability
2
The indicator Affordability obtained a 4.36 average weighted mean which was
interpreted as acceptable. The indicator Durability obtained a 4.48 average weighted
mean which was interpreted as acceptable. The indicator Portability obtained a
4.51average weighted mean which was interpreted as acceptable. The result shows
that the level of acceptability of 6-IN-1 Retractable Mason and Carpentry Tool is
acceptable as perceived by the respondents.
3. Significant different in the level of acceptability of 6-IN-1 Retractable Mason

and Carpentry Tool in terms of Affordability and Durability when the
Demographic Profile is Considered.

2
Conclusion
Based on the findings of the study the researchers came up with the
following conclusions:
1. Most of the respondents are 30-38 years old.
2. The level of acceptability of 6-IN-1 Retractable Mason and Carpentry
Tool is highly acceptable in terms of Affordability, Durability, and
Portability
as perceived by the respondents.
3. There is no significant difference in the level of acceptability of 6-IN-1
Retractable Mason and CarpentryTool asperceived by the respondents
when the demographic profile is considered.
Recommendation
Based on the findings and the conclusions of the study, the researchers came up
with the following recommendations:
1. The researchers would like to recommend the product to the masons to impart
knowledge that 6 in 1 Retractable Masonry and Carpentry Tools can be
alternative tools in working to construction sites.
2. The researchers would like to recommend the product to the carpenters to
impart knowledge that 6 in 1 Retractable Masonry and Carpentry Tools can be
alternative tools in working to construction sites.
3. The researchers would like to recommend the product to engineers for them
to gain knowledge about the multi-tool that they have not usually used and
realize the importance of using it in construction sites.
4. This study recommends as a great resource for future researchers and
provides inspiration for the development of future masonry and carpentry

2
products.
2
BIBLIOGRAPHY
2
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Gallantary (2016). Gallantry's Buyer's Guide on why you should always carry a multi-
tool.
Retrieved from
https://gallantry.com/blogs/journal/guide-to-everyday-carry-multi-tools
Kerns B. (2018). The Return Of The Original Pocket Survival Tool
Retrieved from:
https://www.leatherman.com/blog/featured/the-return-of-the-original-pocket-
survival-tool
Gallantry (2016). Why You Should Always Carry A Multi-Tool.
Retrieved from:
https://gallantry.com/blogs/journal/guide-to-everyday-carry-multi-tools#
Hongquan Z. (2014). A ratchet screwdriver for two-way work doing
Retrieved from:
https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/The-ratchet-screwdriver-of-two-way-
work-doing-
%E5%BC%A0%E7%BA%A2%E6%B3%89/39ee0f05aa0c53c548ff52822412996f7c
808e8f
KYK Tools Blog. (2018). Essential Power Tools for Every Household in the
Philippines.
Retrieved from:
https://kyk.com.ph/blog/essential-power-tools-household-philippines/
2
KYK Tools Blog. (2018). Storage Tips for Power Tools in the Philippines.
Retrieved from:
https://kyk.com.ph/blog/storage-tips-power-tools-philippines/
Robillard R. (2019) The Pulverizer Multi-Purpose Tool
Retrieved from:
https://www.aconcordcarpenter.com/pulverizer-multi-purpose-tool.html
SHAKEDEAL. (2020). What are Multi-Purpose tools and their uses
Retrieved from:
https://www.shakedeal.com/blog/what-are-multi-purpose-tools-
and-their-uses/
3
APPENDIX
3
APPENDIX A
10, MARCH 2022
THRU
DR. MARICEL F. MAURICIO
College Dean
Valenzuela City Polytechnic College
City of Valenzuela
Madam,
Greetings in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ!
We, the 2nd year students taking up Bachelor of Technical Teacher Education
Major in Civil Technology, are currently conducting a research entitled 6-in-1
Retractable Mason and Carpentry tool.
In this connection, we are respectfully asking permission from your good

office to please allow us to conduct our survey using a Questionnaire that will be
given to our respondents. Rest assured that the safety protocols are being observed.
This study is being conducted under the supervision of Ms. Mary Grace R.
Magana. She can be reached by phone at 09101484156 and email
maganamarygrace@gmail.com
Thank you for your consideration regarding this matter.
Truly yours,
Noted:
JOSHUA S. VELEZ MS. MARY GRACE R. MAGANA

Group Leader Adviser
Approved:

College Administrator
3
June 7, 2022

Dean of the College
Valenzuela City Polytechnic College
City of Valenzuela
Madam:
Greetings in the name of our Lord, Jesus Christ!
major in Civil Technology, are conducting a study entitled “6-in-1 Retractable
Mason and Carpentry Tool”. In this connection, we are asking for your cooperation
to rate our product in terms of its acceptability.

office to please allow us to conduct our survey to different barangays in Valenzuela
City.
Truly yours,
Noted:

Group Leader Research Professor
Approved:

College Dean
3
June 7, 2022
HON. ARNOLD NATIVIDAD

Barangay Captain
Barangay Mapulang Lupa
City of Valenzuela
Sir:
major in Civil Technology, are currently conducting a research entitled “6 in 1
Retractable Mason and Carpentry Tool”.

office to please allow us to conduct our survey in your barangay. Rest assured that
safety protocols will be observed. The data that will be gathered will be kept with
utmost animosity and will be used only for academic purposes.
Truly yours,
Noted:

3
June 7, 2022
HON. MAXIMO DE GULA

Barangay Captain
Barangay Parada
City of Valenzuela
Sir:
major in Civil Technology, are currently conducting a research entitled “6 in 1
Retractable Mason and Carpentry Tool”.

office to please allow us to conduct our survey in your barangay. Rest assured that
safety protocols will be observed. The data that will be gathered will be kept with
utmost animosity and will be used only for academic purposes.
This study is being conducted under the supervision ofMs. Mary Grace R.
Truly yours,
Noted:

3
APPENDIX B
SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE
Dear Respondents,
Greetings!
major in Civil Technology, are conducting a study entitled “6-in-1 Retractable
Mason and Carpentry Tool”. In this connection, we are asking for your cooperation
to rate our product in terms of its acceptability.
Rest assured that your opinion will be taken with utmost confidentiality.
A. Direction: Kindly fill in the blanks with the correct information
Name: (Optional) Age:

Gender: Years of work experience:
B. Direction: Kindly put a check (√) on the space corresponding to your

answer. 5 - Highly Acceptable 2 - Less Acceptable
4 - Acceptable 1 - Not Acceptable
3. Moderately Acceptable
DURABILITY 5 4 3 2 1
1. The product can be used for a long period of time.
2.The product can resist rust, corrosion and many others
3.The parts of the product can be switch without being
destroyed, damaged or affect its function.
AFFORDABILITY
1. The price of the product is is worth of its quality
2. The price is affordable compare to buying tools
separately.
3. The product is affordable to everyone.
PORTABILITY
1. The product is easily operated.
2. The size is reasonable.
3. It can be carried even for a long period of time.
3
APPENDIX C
CERTIFICATE OF GRAMMAR
CHECKING
CERTIFICATION
This is to certify that the thesis entitled "6-IN-1 RETRACTABLE
MASONAND CARPENTRY TOOL" conducted by Arnold A. Rojas, Klien A.
Balagot, Bjorn B. Borlagdan, Alvin John M. Fernandez, Jerome B. Mercenes,
and Joshua S. Velez in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of
Bachelor of Technical Teacher Education Major in Civil Technology has been
checked and edited for grammatical and syntactical usage and organization.
MS. MARY JOY I. TIVIDAD

Grammarian
3
APPENDIX D
CERTIFICATE OF STATISTIC
CHECKING
CERTIFICATION
This is to certify that the thesis entitled "6-IN-1 RETRACTABLE
MASONAND CARPENTRY TOOL" conducted by Arnold A. Rojas, Klien A.
Balagot, Bjorn B. Borlagdan, Alvin John M. Fernandez, Jerome B. Mercenes,
and Joshua S. Velez in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of
Bachelor of Technical Teacher Education Major in Civil Technology has been
checked and edited for grammatical and syntactical usage and organization.
ENGR. FLORINO T. OIGA

Statistician
3
APPENDIX E
Distribution of the Respondents according to Age
Table 4.1
Age Tally Frequency Percentage
21-29 IIIII-IIIII-I 11 22%
30-38 IIIII-IIIII-IIIII-IIIII-I 21 42%
39-47 IIIII-IIIII-II 12 24%
48-56 IIIII 5 10%
57-65 I 1 2%
Total 50 50 100%
Age 21-29 Age 30-38 Age 39-47 Age 48-56 Age 57-65
P= x P= x P= x P = x 100% P = x 100%
100% 100% 100%
11 21 12 5 1
= = = = =
50 50 50 50 50
= 0.22(100%) = 0.42(100%) = 0.24(100%) = 0.1(100%) = 0.02(100%)
P = 22% P =42% P = 24% P =10% P = 2%

38
Valenzuela
APPENDIX F
Distribution of the Respondents according to years of work

experience
Table 4.2
Years Tally Frequency Percentage
2-7 IIIII-IIIII-IIIII-IIIII-IIIII-IIII 29 58%
8-13 IIIII-IIIII-IIIII-I 16 32%
14-19 II 2 4%
20-25 0 0 0%
26-31 III 3 6%
Total 50 50 100%
Year 2-7 Year 8-13 Year 14-19 Year 20-25 Year 26-31
P= x P= x P= x 100% P = x 100% P = x 100%

100% 100%
29 16 2 0 3
= = = = =
50 50 50 50 50
= 0.58 = 0.32 = 0.04 = 0.0 = 0.06
P = 58% P = 32% P = 4% P = 0% P = 6%
3
VALENZUELA CITY POLYTECHNIC
COLLEGE
APPENDIX G
Summary of Tally According to
Age Table 5.1

In terms of Affordability
21-29 5 4 3 2 1 Total
1 4 7 0 0 0 11
2 4 6 1 0 0 11
3 7 2 2 0 0 11
Total 15 15 3 0 0 33
Average 5 5 1 0 0 11
30-38 5 4 3 2 1 Total
1 15 3 2 1 0 21
2 13 5 2 1 0 21
3 10 8 2 1 0 21
Total 38 16 6 3 0 63
Average 12.6667 5.3333 2 1 0 21
39-47 5 4 3 2 1 Total
1 7 4 1 0 0 12
2 6 6 0 0 0 12
3 5 6 1 0 0 12
Total 18 16 2 0 0 36
Average 6 5.3333 0.6667 0 0 12
48-56 5 4 3 2 1 Total
1 2 3 0 0 0 5
2 2 3 0 0 0 5
3 2 2 1 0 0 5
Total 6 8 1 0 0 15
Average 2 2.6667 0.3333 0 0 5
57-65 5 4 3 2 1 Total
1 0 1 0 0 0 1
2 1 0 0 0 0 1
3 0 1 0 0 0 1
Total 1 2 0 0 0 3
Average 0.3333 0.6667 0 0 0 1
4
COLLEGE
Age 5 4 3 2 1 N TWS WM Verbal
Interpretation
21-29 5 5 1 0 0 11 48 4.3636 Acceptable
12.666 Highly
30-38 5.3333 2 1 0 21 92.6667 4.4127
7 Acceptable
Highly
39-47 6 5.3333 0.6667 0 0 12 53.3333 4.4444
Acceptable
48-56 2 2.6667 0.3333 0 0 5 21.6667 4.3333 Acceptable
57-65 0.3333 0.6667 0 0 0 1 4.3333 4.3333 Acceptable

Highly
Total 26 19 4 1 0 50 218 4.36
Acceptable
AWM 4.36 Acceptable
39-47 57-65
=6(5)+5.3333(4)+0.6667(3)
=0.3333(5)+0.6667(4)
= 53.3333
= 4.3333
WM=TWS/N
WM=TWS/N
= 53.3333/12
= 4.3333/1
= 4.4444
= 4.3333
=Highly Acceptable
= Acceptable
48-56
=2(5)+2.6667(4)+0.3333(3)
= 21.6667
WM=TWS/N
= 21.6667/5
= 4.3333
= Acceptable
4
COLLEGE
APPENDIX H
Summary of Tally According to Years of Work
Experience Table 5.2

2-7 5 4 3 2 1 Total
1 16 10 2 1 0 29
2 14 11 3 1 0 29
3 14 10 4 1 0 29
Total 44 31 9 3 0 87
Average 14.6667 10.3333 3 1 0 29
8-13 5 4 3 2 1 Total
1 9 6 1 0 0 16
2 9 7 0 0 0 16
3 8 7 1 0 0 16
Total 26 20 2 0 0 48
Average 8.6667 6.6667 0.6667 0 0 16
14-19 5 4 3 2 1 Total
1 2 0 0 0 0 2
2 1 1 0 0 0 2
3 1 1 0 0 0 2
Total 4 2 0 0 0 6
Average 1.3333 0.6667 0 0 0 2
20-25 5 4 3 2 1 Total
1 0 0 0 0 0 0
2 0 0 0 0 0 0
3 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 0 0 0 0 0 0
Average 0 0 0 0 0 0
26-31 5 4 3 2 1 Total
1 1 2 0 0 0 3
2 2 1 0 0 0 3
3 1 1 1 0 0 3
Total 4 4 1 0 0 9
Average 1.3333 1.3333 0.3333 0 0 3
4
COLLEGE
Years of
work Verbal
5 4 3 2 1 N TWS WM
experience Interpretation
2-7 14.6667 10.3333 3 1 0 29 125.6667 4.3333 Acceptable
Highly
8-13 8.6667 6.6667 0.6667 0 0 16 72.0004 4.5 Acceptable
Highly
14-19 1.3333 0.6667 0 0 0 2 9.3333 4.6667 Acceptable
20-25 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0000
26-31 1.3333 1.3333 0.3333 0 0 3 12.9996 4.3332 Acceptable
Total 26 19 4 1 0 50 218 4.36 Acceptable
AWM 4.36
Acceptable
26-31
2-7 14-19
= 14.6667(5)+10.3333(4)+3(3)+1(2) = 1.3333(5)+0.6667(4) =1.3333(5)+ 1.3333(4)
= 125.6667 = 9.3333 +0.3333(3)
WM= TWS/N WM=TWS/N = 12.9996
= 125.6667/29 = 9.3333/2 WM=TWS/N

= 4.3333 = 4.6667 = 12.9996/3
= Acceptable =Highly Acceptable
= 4.3332
= Acceptable
8-13 20-25
= 8.6667(5)+6.6667(4)+0.6667(3) N/A
= 72.0004
WM=TWS/N
= 72.0004/16
= 4.5
=Highly Acceptable
4
COLLEGE
APPENDIX I
Summary of Tally According to
Age Table 5.3

In terms of
Durability
21-29 5 4 3 2 1 Total
1 8 2 1 0 0 11
2 4 3 3 1 0 11
3 8 3 0 0 0 11
Total 20 8 4 1 0 33
Average 6.6667 2.6667 1.3333 0.3333 0 11
30-38 5 4 3 2 1 Total
1 12 9 0 0 0 21
2 12 5 4 0 0 21
3 14 4 3 0 0 21
Total 38 18 7 0 0 63
Average 12.6667 6 2.3333 0 0 21
39-47 5 4 3 2 1 Total
1 8 4 0 0 0 12
2 6 5 0 1 0 12
3 7 5 0 0 0 12
Total 21 14 0 1 0 36
Average 7 4.6667 0 0.3333 0 12
48-56 5 4 3 2 1 Total
1 2 3 0 0 0 5
2 0 4 1 0 0 5
3 5 0 0 0 0 5
Total 7 7 1 0 0 15
Average 2.3333 2.3333 0.3333 0 0 5
57-65 5 4 3 2 1 Total
1 0 1 0 0 0 1
2 1 0 0 0 0 1
3 1 0 0 0 0 1
Total 2 1 0 0 0 3
Average 0.6667 0.3333 0 0 0 1
4
COLLEGE
In terms of Durability
Age 5 4 3 2 1 N TWS WM Verbal

Interpretation
21-29 6.6667 2.6667 1.3333 0.3333 0 11 48.6668 4.4243 Acceptable
12.666
30-38 7 6 2.3333 0 0 21 94.3334 4.4921 Acceptable
Highly
39-47 7 4.6667 0 0.3333 0 12 54.3334 4.5278 Acceptable
48-56 2.3333 2.3333 0.3333 0 0 5 21.9996 4.40 Acceptable
Highly
57-65 0.6667 0.3333 0 0 0 1 4.6667 4.6667 Acceptable
29.333
Total 4 16 4 0.6666 0 50 223.9999 4.48 Acceptable
AWM 4.48 Acceptable
21-29 39-47
=7(5)+4.6667(4)+ 57-65
=6.6667(5)+2.6667(4)+1.3333(3)+
0.3333(2)
0.3333(2) = 0.6667(5)+0.3333(4)
= 54.3334 = 4.6667
= 48.6668 WM=TWS/N
WM= TWS/N
= 54.3334/12 WM=TWS/N
= 48.6668/11 = 4.48 = 4.6667/1
=Highly Acceptable
= 4.4243
= 4.6667
= Acceptable = Highly Acceptable
48-56
30-38 =2.3333(5)+2.3333(4)+ 0.3333(3)
= 12.6667(5)+6(4)+2.3333(3)
= 94.3334 = 21.9996
WM=TWS/N
WM=TWS/N = 21.9996/5
= 4.40
= 94.3334/21
= Acceptable
= 4.4921
=
ENDIX
4
COLLEGE
APPENDIX J
Summary of Tally According to Years of Work
Experience
Table 5.4
2-7 5 4 3 2 1 Total
1 18 10 1 0 0 29
2 15 7 6 1 0 29
3 18 8 3 0 0 29
Total 51 25 10 1 0 87
Average 17 8.3333 3.3333 0.3333 0 29
8-13 5 4 3 2 1 Total
1 10 6 0 0 0 16
2 6 8 1 1 0 16
3 13 3 0 0 0 16
Total 29 17 1 1 0 48
Average 9.6667 5.6667 0.3333 0.3333 0 16
14-19 5 4 3 2 1 Total
1 1 1 0 0 0 2
2 1 0 1 0 0 2
3 1 1 0 0 0 2
Total 3 2 1 0 0 6
Average 1 0.6667 0.3333 0 0 2
20-25 5 4 3 2 1 Total
1 0 0 0 0 0 0
2 0 0 0 0 0 0
3 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 0 0 0 0 0 0
Average 0 0 0 0 0 0
26-31 5 4 3 2 1 Total
1 1 2 0 0 0 3
2 1 2 0 0 0 3
3 3 0 0 0 0 3
Total 5 4 0 0 0 9
Average 1.6667 1.3333 0 0 0 3
4
COLLEGE
Years of
work Verbal
5 4 3 2 1 N TWS WM Interpretatio
experienc
e n
8.3333 0.333 2 128.999 4.448
2-7 17 3.3333 3 0 9 7 3 Acceptable
9.6667 5.6667 0.333 1 4.541 Highly

8-13 0.3333 0 72.6668
3 6 7 Acceptable
0.6667 4.333
14-19 1 0.3333 0 0 2 8.6667 Acceptable
4
20-25 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1.6667 1.3333 4.555 Highly
26-31 0 0 0 3 13.6667
6 Acceptable
29.33 0.666 5 223.999 Highly
Total 16 4 0 4.48
33 6 0 7 Acceptable
AWM 4.48 Acceptable
2-7
14-19 26-31
= 17(5)+8.3333(4)-
=1(5)+0.6667(4)+0.3333(3) =1.6667(5)+1.3333
3.3333(3)+ 0.3333(2)
= 8.6667 (4)
= 128.9997
WM= TWS/N = 13.6667

WM=TWS/N
= 128.9997/29
= 8.6667/2 WM=TWS/N
= 4.4483
= 4.3334 = 13.6667/3
= Acceptable
=Acceptable = 4.5556
8-13 = Highly
Acceptable
=9.6667(5)+5.6667(4)+0.3333(3)+ 20-25
0.3333(2)
N/A
= 72.6668
WM=TWS/N
= 72.6668/16
= 4.5417
= Highly Acceptable
4
COLLEGE
APPENDIX K
Summary of Tally According to Age
Table 5.5
In terms of Portability
21-29 5 4 3 2 1 Total
1 8 2 1 0 0 11
2 5 4 2 0 0 11
3 2 7 2 0 0 11
Total 15 13 5 0 0 33
Average 5 4.3333 1.6667 0 0 11
30-38 5 4 3 2 1 Total
1 19 2 0 0 0 21
2 17 2 1 1 0 21
3 12 8 1 0 0 21
Total 48 12 2 1 0 63
Average 16 4 0.6667 0.3333 0 21
39-47 5 4 3 2 1 Total
1 8 3 1 0 0 12
2 6 4 2 0 0 12
3 7 5 0 0 0 12
Total 21 12 3 0 0 36
Average 7 4 1 0 0 12
48-56 5 4 3 2 1 Total
1 2 3 0 0 0 5
2 2 2 1 0 0 5
3 2 2 1 0 0 5
Total 6 7 2 0 0 15
Average 2 2.3333 0.6667 0 0 5
57-65 5 4 3 2 1 Total
1 1 0 0 0 0 1
2 0 1 0 0 0 1
3 0 1 0 0 0 1
Total 1 2 0 0 0 3
Average 0.3333 0.6667 0 0 0 1
4
COLLEGE
Verbal
Age 5 4 3 2 1 N TWS WM Interpretatio
n
1.666 1 47.333 4.303
21-29 5 4.3333 0 0 1 Acceptable
7 3 0
0.666 0.333 2 98.666 4.698 Highly
30-38 16 4 0
7 3 1 7 4 Acceptable
1 Highly
39-47 7 4 1 0 0 54 4.5
2 Acceptable
0.666 21.333 4.266
48-56 2 2.3333 0 0 5
7 3 7
0.333 4.333
57-65 3 0.6667 0 0 0 1 4.3333 3 Acceptable
30.33 15.333 4.000 0.333 0.000 5 225.66 4.513
Total 33 3 1 3 0 0 66 3 Acceptable
AWM 4.51 Acceptable
21-29 39-47 57-65

= 5(5)+4.3333(4)+1.6667(3) = 7(5)+4(4)+1(3) =0.3333(5)+0.6667
= 47.3333 = 54 (4)
WM= TWS/N WM=TWS/N
= 4.3333
= 47.3333/11 = 54/12
WM=TWS/N
= 4.3030 = 4.5
= Acceptable =Highly Acceptable = 4.3333/1
= 4.3333
48-56 = Acceptable
30-38
=2(5)+2.3333(4)+0.6667(3)
= 16(5)+4(4)+0.6667(3)+0.3333(2)
= 21.3333
= 98.6667
WM= TWS/N
WM=TWS/N
= 21.3333/5
= 98.6667/21
= 4.2667
= 4.6984
= Acceptable
= Highly Acceptable
4
COLLEGE
APPENDIX L
Summary of Tally According to Years of Work Experience
Table 5.6
2-7 5 4 3 2 1 Total
1 21 6 2 0 0 29
2 17 7 4 1 0 29
3 16 11 2 0 0 29
Total 54 24 8 1 0 87
Average 18 8 2.6667 0.3333 0 29
8-13 5 4 3 2 1 Total
1 13 1 2 0 0 16
2 11 5 0 0 0 16
3 7 9 0 0 0 16
Total 31 15 2 0 0 48
Average 10.3333 5 0.6667 0 0 16
14-19 5 4 3 2 1 Total
1 0 2 0 0 0 2
2 1 1 0 0 0 2
3 1 0 1 0 0 2
Total 2 3 1 0 0 6
Average 0.6667 1 0.3333 0 0 2
20-25 5 4 3 2 1 Total
1 0 0 0 0 0 0
2 0 0 0 0 0 0
3 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 0 0 0 0 0 0
Average 0 0 0 0 0 0
26-31 5 4 3 2 1 Total
1 2 1 0 0 0 3
2 1 2 0 0 0 3
3 1 1 1 0 0 3
Total 4 4 1 0 0 9
Average 1.3333 1.3333 0.3333 0 0 3
5
COLLEGE
Years of
work Verbal
5 4 3 2 1 N TWS WM
experien Interpretation
ce
2.6667 0.333 29 130.666 4.505
2-7 18 8 0 Acceptable
3 7 7
10.333 0.6667 16 4.604 Highly
8-13 5 0 0 73.6666
3 2 Acceptable
0.3333 0 2 4.166 Highly
14-19 0.6667 1 0 8.3334 7 Acceptable
20-25 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4.333
26-31 1.3333 1.3333 0.3333 0 0 3 12.9996 Acceptable
2
30.333 15.333 0.333 50 225.666 4.513
Total 4 0 Acceptable
3 3 3 3 3
AWM 4.48 Acceptable
2-7
14-19 26-31
= 18(5)+8(4)+2.6667(3)+0.3333(2)
=0.6667(5)+1(4)+0.3333(3)
=1.3333(5)+1.3
= 130.6667 333(4)
=8.3334 +0.3333(3)
WM= TWS/N
WM=TWS/N = 12.9996
= 130.6667/29
= 8.3334/2 WM=TWS/N
= 4.5057
= 4.1667
= Acceptable = 12.9996/3
=Highly Acceptable
8-13 = 4.3332
20-25
= 10.3333(5)+5(4)+0.6667(3) = Acceptable
N/A
= 73.6666
WM=TWS/N
= 73.6666/16
= 4.6042
= Highly Acceptable
5
COLLEGE
APPENDIX M
Chi-Square Test of the Respondents Profile as to years of work
experience Table 6.1
PORTA 5 4 3 2 1 TOTAL
BILITY O E O E O E O E O E
2-7 18 17.593 8 8.893 2.666 2.32 0.3333 0.1933 0 0 29
3 3 7
8-13 10.333 9.7067 5 4.906 0.666 1.28 0 0.106 0 0 16
3 7 7 7
14-19 0.666 1.2133 1 0.613 0.333 0.16 0 0.0133 0 0 2
7 3 3
20-25 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
26-31 1.3333 1.82 1.333 0.92 0.333 0.24 0 0.02 0 0 3
3 3
TOTAL 30.33 30.333 15.33 15.33 4 4 0.3333 0.3333 0 0 50
33 3 33 33
5
3
4
= 30.3333 (29) 879.6666
4 (29) 116
= 50 = 15.3333 (29) 444.6657 = 8. 8933 = = = 1. 74
50 = =
50 50 50 50
30.3333( 16) 485.3328
= = = 9. 7067 15.3333(16) 245.3328 4 (16) 64
= = = 1. 28
50 50 = = = 4. 9067
50 50 50 50
= 30.3333(2) 60.6666 4 (2) = 0. 16
8
= =
= = 1. 2133 15.3333 (2) 30.6666
50 50 = = = 0. 6133 50 50
30.3333(0) 0 50 50
= = =0 4(0) 0
15.3333 (0) 0 = = 0
50 50 = = = 0 =
50 50 50 50
= 3 0.3333(3) 90 .9999 15.3333 (3) 45.9999 4(3)
=
12
= 0. 24
=
= = = = 0. 92 50 50
50 50 50 50
2
1
0.3333(29)
= 9.6657 = 0. 1933 0(29) 0
= = = 0
50 50 50 50
=
0.3333( 16) = 0. 1067 0(16) 0

= =
5.3328
= = 0
50 50 50 50
=
0.3333(2) 0.6666 0(2) 0

= = = 0. 0133 = = = 0
50 50 50 50
0.3333(0) 0
= = = 0
50 50
0.3333(3) 0.9999
= = = 0. 02
5
COLLEGE
5
0 50
0
(
0
)
0
= = = 0
50 50
0(2) 0
= = = 0
50 50
52
Kamagong Street Fortune 6 Village Parada Valenzuela
∑( − ) ²
×²=
5 4 3
= (18 − 17.5933)² = (8 − 8.8933)² = (2.6667 − 2.32)²
17.5933
8.8933 2.32
= 0. 0094 = 0. 0897 = 0. 0518
= ( 10.3333 − = (5 − 4.9067)² = (0.6667 − 1.28)²
9.7067)² 4.9067 1.28
9.7067 = 0. 0018 = 02939
= 0. 0404
(1 − 0.6133)² (0.3333 − 0.16)²
(0.6667 − 1.2133)² = 4.9067 = 0.16
= 1.2133 = 0. 2438 = 0. 1877
= 0. 2462
(0 − 0)² (0 − 0)²
(0 − 0)² = 0 = 0
= 0 =0 =0
=0
= (1.3333 − (0.3333 − 0.24)²
= (1.3333 − 1.82)² 0.92)² = 0.24
1.82 0.92 = 0. 0363
= 0. 1316 = 0. 1857 ∑ = 0. 5697
∑ = 0.4276 ∑ = 0. 521
2
1
= (0.3333 − 0.1933)² 0(0)²
=
0.1933 0 Df = (Row-1) (Column-1)
= 0. 1014 =0
Df = (4-1) (4-1)
= (0 − 0.1067)² 0(0)²
0.1067 = 0 Df = (3) (3)
= 0. 1067 =0 Df = 9
(0 − 0.0133)²
0(0)²
=
= 0
0.0133 2
= 0. 0133 =0 x Tabular @ 0.05 = 16.919

= (0 − 0)²
=
0(0)²
x2 = 0.4276+0.521+0.5697+0.2414
0 0
=0 =0 x2= 1.7597
= (0 − 0.02)² 0(0)² x2= 1.760
0.02 = 0
= 0.02 =0
∑ = 0.2414
53
APPENDIX N
Chi-Square Test of the Respondents Profile as to age
Table 6.2
PORTA 5 4 3 2 1 TOTAL
21-29 5 6.6733 4.333 3.373 1.6667 0.88 0 0.0733 0 0 11
3 3
30-38 16 12.74 4 6.44 0.6667 1.68 0.3333 0.14 0 0 21
39-47 7 7.28 4 3.68 1 0.96 0 0.08 0 0 12
48-56 2 3.0333 2.333 1.5333 0.6667 0.4 0 0.0333 0 0 5
3
57-65 0.3333 0.6067 0.666 0.306 0 0.08 0 0.0067 0 0 1
7 7
TOTAL 30.333 30.333 15.33 15.33 4.0001 4 0.3333 0.3333 0 0 50
3 3 33 33
5 4
30.3333( 11) 333.6663 15.3333( 11) 168.6663
= = = 6. 6 33 = =
50 = 3. 3733
50 50 50
30.3333(21)
636.9993 15.3333(21) 321.9993
= = 12 . 74 = = = 6. 44
50 50 50
=
50 333.6663 15.3333( 12) 183.9996
30.3333( 12)
= = = 7. 28 = = = 3. 68
50 50 50 50
30.3333(5) 151.6665 15.3333(5) 76.6665
= = = 3. 0333 = = = 1. 5333
50 50 50 50
30.3333( 1) 30.3333 15.3333( 1) 15.3333
= = = 0. 6067 = = = 0. 3067
50 50 50 50
2 1
3
4.0001( 11) 44.0011 0.3333( 11) 3.6663 0(11) 0
= = = 0. 8 8 = = = 0. 0733 = = = 0
50 50 50 50 50 50
4.0001(21) 84.0021 0.3333(21) 6.9993 0 (21) 0
= = 1. 6 = = = 0. 14 = = = 0
= 50 50 50 50 50
50
4.0001( 12) 48.0012 0.3333( 12) 3.9996 = 0. 08 0(12) 0
= = = 0. 96 = = = = = 0
50 50 50 50 50 50
4.0001(5) 20.0005 0.3333(5) 1.6665 0 (5) 0
= = = 0. 4 = = 0. 0333 = = 0
50 50 50 50 50 50
= =
4.0001( 1) 4.0001 0.3333( 1) 0.3333 0(1) 0
= =
50 50 = 0. 08 = = = 0. 0067 = = = 0
50 50 50 50
5
COLLEGE
∑( − ) ²
×²=
4 3
5
= (1.6667 − 0.88)²
= (4.3333 − 3.3733)² 0.88
= (5 − 6.6733)²
3.3733 = 0. 7033
6.6733
= 0. 2732 = (0.6667 − 1.68)²
= 0. 4196
= (4 − 6.44)² 1.68
= (16 − 12.74)² = 0. 6112
6.44
12.74 = (1 − 0.96)²
= 0. 9245
= 0. 8342 0.96
(4 − 3.68)² = 0. 0017
(7 − 7.28)² =
= 3.68 = (0.6667 − 0.4)²
7.28
= 0. 0278 0.4
= 0. 0108
= (2.3333 − 1.5333)² = 0. 1778
= (2 − 3.0333)²
1.5333 = (0 − 0.08)²
3.0333 0.08
= 0. 4174
= 0. 352 = 0. 08
= (0.6667 − 0.3067)²
= (0.3333 −
0.6067)² 0.3067
0.6067 =
= 0. 1232 ∑ = 2. 0655
∑ = 1.7398 ∑ = 1. 574
1
2
(0 − 0.0733)² 0(0)²
= Df = (Row-1) (Column-1)
= 0.0733 0
= 0. 0733 =0 Df = (5-1) (4-1)
(0.3333 − 0.14)² 0(0)²
= = Df = (4) (3)
0
0.14 =0 Df = 12
= 0. 2669 0(0)²
(0 − 0.08)² =
= 0
0.08 =0 x2 Tabular @ 0.05 = 21.026
= 0. 08 0(0)²
(0 − 0.0333)² = x2 = 1.7398+2.0655+1.574+0.4269
= 0
0.0333 =0
= 0. 0333 0(0)²
x2= 5.8062
(0 − 0.0067)² = 0 x2= 5.806
=
0.0067 =0
= 0. 0067
∑ = 0.4269
55
APPENDIX O
DURA 5 4 3 2 1 TOTAL
2-7 17 17.013 8.333 9.28 3.3333 2.32 0.3333 0.3866 0 0 29
4 3
8-13 9.6667 9.3867 5.666 5.12 0.3333 1.28 0.3333 0.2133 0 0 16
7
14-19 1 1.1733 0.666 0.64 0.3333 0.16 0 0.0267 0 0 2
7
20-25 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
26-31 1.6667 1.7600 1.3333 0.96 0 0.24 0 0.04 0 0 3
TOTAL 29.333 29.333 16 16 4 4 0.6666 0.6666 0 0 50

4 4
4
5 3
29.3334(29) 850.6686 = 16 (29) 464 4 (29) 116
= = = 17. 0134 = = 9. 2
8= = = 2. 32
50
50 50 50 50 50
29.3334 ( 16) 469.3344 16 16) 256
= = = 5. 4 ( 16) 64
= = = 9. 3867 12
50 50 0 50 50
4
16 (2) 32
29.3334 (2) 58.6668 = = = 0. 4 (2) 8
6
= = = 1. 1733 50 50 = = = 0. 1600
50 50 16 (0) 0 50 50
29.3334 (0) 0 = = = 4 (0) = 0 = 0
0 6 =
50 50
50 50 16 (3) 48 50 50
29.3334 (3) 88.0002 = = = 0. = 4(3) = 12
9 50
= = = 1. 7600 50
50 50 = 0. 2400
50 50
2 1
0.6666 (29) 19.3314 0 (29) 0
= = = 0. 3866 = = = 0
50 50 50 50
0.6666 ( 16) 10.6656 0(16) 0
= = = 0. 2133 = = =0
50 50 50 50
0.6666 (2) 1.3332 0 (2) 0
= = = 0. 0267 = = =0
50 50 50 50
0.6666 (0) 0
= 0(0) = 0 = 0
= = = 0
50 50 50 50
0.6666 (3) 1.9998 0 (2) 0
= = = 0
= 0. 0400 50 50
50 50
56
∑(−)²
×²=
5 3
4
(17 − 17.0134)² (8.3333 − 9.28)² (3.3333 − 2.32)²
= 17.0134 =
= 2.32
= 0. 00001 9.28 = 0. 4426
= 0. 0966
(9.6667 − (5.6667 − 5.12)² (0.3333 − 1.28)²
=
9.3867)² =
= 1.2800
9.3867 5.12 = 0. 7002
= 0. 0084 = 0. 0584
(0.6667 − 0.64)² (0.3333 − 0.16)²
(1 − 1.1733)² = =
= 0.64 0.1600
1.1733
= 0. 0256 = 0. 0011 = 0. 1877
(0 − 0)² (0 − 0)² (0 − 0)²
= 0 = =
0 0
=0 =0 =0
(1.6667 − 1.7600)² (1.3333 − (0 − 0.24)²
= 1.7600 = 0.96)² = 0.2400
= 0. 0049 0.96 = 0. 2400
∑ = 0.03891 = 0. 1452
∑ = 1. 5705
∑ = 0. 3013
2 1
(0.3333 − 0.3866)² 0(0)² Df = (Row-1)

1 (Column-1)
= = 0
0.3866 Df = (4-1) (4-1)
= 0. 0073 =0
0(0)² Df = (3) (3)
(0.3333 − 0.2133)²
= = 0
0.2133 Df = 9
= 0. 0675 =0
(0 − 0.0267)² 0(0)²
= =
0.0267 0 x2 Tabular @ 0.05 = 16.919
= 0. 00267 =0
(0 − 0)² = 0(0)² x2 = 0.03891+0.3013+1.5705+0.1415
=
0 0
=0 =0 x2= 2.05221
0(0)² x2= 2.052
(0 − 0.04)² =
= 0.0400 0
= 0. 04 =0
∑ = 0.1415
5
COLLEGE
APPENDIX P
Table 6.4
DURA 5 4 3 2 1 TOTAL
21-29 6.666 6.453 2.666 3.52 1.333 0.88 0.333 0.146 0 0 11
7 3 7 3 3 7
30-38 12.66 12.32 6 6.72 2.333 1.68 0 0.28 0 0 21
67 3
39-47 7 7.04 4.666 3.84 0 0.96 0.333 0.16 0 0 12
7 3
48-56 2.333 2.933 2.333 1.6 0.333 0.4 0 0.066 0 0 5
3 3 3 3 7
57-65 0.666 0.586 0.333 0.32 0 0.08 0 0.013 0 0 1
7 7 3 3
TOTAL 29.33 29.33 16 16 4 4 0.666 0.666 0 0 50
34 33 6 7
5
=
29.3334 ( 11) 322.6674
= = 6. 4533 4
50 50 3
29.3334(21) 616.0014 16 ( 11) 176 = 3. 52 4(11) 44
= = =
= = 12. 32 = = = 0. 88
50 50 50 50 50 50
= 29.3334(12) 352.0008 16 (21) 336 = 6. 72 4 (21) 84
= =
= = 7. 04 = = = 1. 68
50 50 50 50 50 50
29.3334(5) 146.667 16 ( 12) 192
= = = = = 3. 4 ( 12) 48
= 2. 9333 = = = 0. 96
50 50
26.3333(1) 84 50 50
50 50
26.3333 16 (5) 80 4 (5) 20
= = = 0. 5267 = = = 1.
50 50 = = = 0. 4
6
50 50
50 50
16(1) 16 = 0. 32 4(1) 4
= = = = = 0. 08
50 50 50 50
2 1
0.6666 ( 11) 7.3326
= = = 0. 1467
0 (11) 0
= = = 0
50 50 50 50
0.6666 (21) 13.9986 0 (21) 0
= = = 0. 28
= = = 0
50 50 50 50
0.6666 ( 12) 7.9992 0(12) 0
= = = 0. 16
= = =0
50 50 50 50
0.6666 (5) 3.3333 0 (5) 0
= = = 0. 0667
= = = 0
50 50 50 50
0.6666 ( 1) 1
0(1) 0
= = = 0. 0133 = = = 0
5
COLLEGE
50 50 50 50
58
∑( − ) ²
×²=
5 4 3
(6.6667 − 6.4533)² (2.6667 − ( 1.3333 − 0.88)²
= =
= 3.52)² 3.52 0.88
= 0. 2069 = 0. 2335
6.4533 (6 − 6.72)² (2.3333 − 1.68)²
= 0. 0071 = =
6.72 1.68
(12.6667 − 12.32)²
= 12.32 = 0. 0771 = 0. 2540
= 0. 0098 (4.6667 − 3.84)² (0 − 0.96)²
(7 − 7.04)² = =
0.96
= 3.84 = 0. 96
7.04 = 0. 1780
= 0. 0002
(2.3333 − 1.6)² (0.3333 − 0.4)²
(2.3333 − 2.9333)² = =
= 1.6 0.4
2.9333 = 0. 3361 = 0. 0111
= 0. 1227 (0.3333 − 0.32)² (0 − 0.08)²
= =
(0.6667 − 0.5867)² 0.32 0.08
= 0.5867 = 0. 0006 = 0. 08
= 0. 0110
∑ = 0.1508 ∑ = 0. 7987 ∑ = 1. 5386
2
1
(0.3333 −
=
0.1467)² 0(0)²
= 0
0.1467 Df = (Row-1) (Column-1)
= 0. 2374 =0
0(0)² Df = (5-1) (4-1)
(0 − 0.28)² =
= 0.28 0 Df = (4) (3)
= 0. 28 =0
0(0)² Df = 12
(0.3333 − 0.16)² =
= 0.16 0
= 0. 1877 =0
(0 − 0.0667)² 0(0)² x2 Tabular @ 0.05 = 21.026
= =
0.0667 0
x2 = 0.1508+0.7987+1.5386+0.7851
= 0. 0667 =0
0(0)² x2= 3.2732
(0 − 0.0133)²
= =
0.0133
= 0. 0133 0 x2= 3.273
=0
∑ = 0.7851
5
COLLEGE
APPENDIX Q
AFFORD 5 4 3 2 1 TOTAL
ABILITY O E O E O E O E O E
2-7 14.6667 15.08 10.333 11.02 3 2.32 1 0.58 0 0 29
3
8-13 8.6667 8.32 6.6667 6.08 0.6667 1.28 0 0.32 0 0 16
14-19 1.3333 1.04 0.6667 0.76 0 0.16 0 0.04 0 0 2
20-25 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
26-31 1.3333 1.56 1.3333 1.14 0.3333 0.24 0 0.06 0 0 3
TOTAL 26 26 19 19 4 4 1 1 0 0 50
5 4 3
26 (29) 754 19 (29) 551 4 (29) 116
= = 15. = = = 11. 0 = = = 2. 32
=
0 50 50 50 50
50 50 19 ( 16) 30 4 ( 16) 64
26 ( 16)416
= = = 8. 32 = = = 6. 08 = = = 1. 28
50 50 50 50 50 50
26 (2) 52 19 (2) 38 4 (2) 8
= = = 1. 04 = = = 0. 76 = = = 0. 16
50 50 50 50 50 50
26 (0) 0 19 (0) 0 4(0) 0
= = =0 = = =0 = = =0
50 50 50 50 50 50
26 (3) 78 19 (3) 57 4(3) 12
= = = 1. 56 = = = 1. 14 = = = 0. 24
50 50 50 50 50 50
2 1
1 0
(29) = 29 = 0. 58 (29) =0
= = = 0
50 50 50
16 50
1 = = 0. 32 0(16) = 0
(16) = = 0
=
50 50 50 50
1 (2) 2 = 0. 04 0(2) 0
=
= = = = 0
50 50 50 5
1 (0) 0 0 (0) 0
= = =0 = = =0
50 50 50 50
1 (3) 3 0(2) 0
= 0. 06 = = = 0
= =
6
COLLEGE
50 50 50 50
6
COLLEGE
∑( − ) ²
×²=
5 4 3
(14.6667 − 15.08)² (10.3333 − 11.02)² (3 − 2.32)²
= = =
15.08 11.02 2.32
= 0. 0113 = 0. 0428 = 0. 1993
(8.6667 − 8.32)² (6.6667 − 6.08)² (0.6667 − 1.28)²
= = =
8.32 6.08 1.28
= 0. 0144 = 0. 0566 = 0. 2939
= (1.3333 − (0.6667 − ² (0 − 0.16)²
1.04)² =
0.76) =
1.04 0.76 0.16
= 0. 0827 = 0. 0115 = 0. 16
(0 0
− 0)² (0 0
− 0)² (0 0− 0)²
= =0 = =0 = =0
(1.3333 − 1.56)² ( 1.3333 − 1.14)² (0.3333 − 0.24)²
= = =
1.56 1.14 0.24
= 0. 0329 = 0. 0328 = 0. 0363
∑ = 0.1413 ∑ = 0. 1437 ∑ = 0. 6895
2 1
(1 − 0.58)² Df = (Row-1) (Column-1)

= 0.58
= 0. 3041 0(0)² Df = (5-1) (4-1)
= 0
(0 − 0.32)² Df = (4) (3)
= 0.32 =0
= 0. 32 0(0)²
Df = 12
(0 − 0.04)² =
= 0
0.04 =0
= 0. 04
0(0)² x2 Tabular @ 0.05 = 21.026
(0 − 0)²
= = 0
=0 x2 = 0.1413+0.1437+0.6895+0.7241
0 0(0)² x2= 1.6986
=0 = 0 x2= 1.699
(0 − =0
=0.06)²
0.06 0(0)²
= 0. 06 =
∑ = 0.724 0
=0
6
COLLEGE
APPENDIX R
Table 6.6
AFFORD 5 4 3 2 1 TOTAL
ABILITY O E O E O E O E O E
21-29 5 5.72 5 4.18 1 0.88 0 0.22 0 0 11
30-38 12.666 10.92 5.3333 7.98 2 1.68 1 0.42 0 0 21
7
39-47 6 6.24 5.3333 4.56 0.6667 0.96 0 0.24 0 0 12
48-56 2 2.6 2.6667 19 0.3333 0.4 0 0.1 0 0 5
57-65 0.3333 0.52 0.6667 0.38 0 0.08 0 0.02 0 0 1
TOTAL 26 26 19 19 4 4 1 1 0 0 50
5 4 3
26 ( 11) 289 4 (11) 44
= = = 5. 72
19 (11) 209
= = = 4. 18 = = = 0. 88
50 50 50 50 50 50
26 (21) 546 19 (21)
399 = 7. 98 =
4 (21) 84
= = = 10. 92 = = 1. 68
= =
50 50 50 50 50 50
26 ( 12) 312 19 ( 12) 228 =
4 ( 12) 48
= = = 6. 24 = = = 4. 56 = = 0. 96
50 50 50 50 50 50
26 (5) 130 19 (5) 95 4 (5) 20
= = = 2. 6 = = = 1. 9 = = = 0. 4
50 50 50 50 50 50
26 (1) 26. 19 (1) 19 4 (1) 4
= = = 0. 52 = = = 0. 38 = = = 0. 08
50 50 50 50 50 50
2 1
1(11) 11 0 (11) 0
= = = 0. 22 = = = 0
50 50 50 50
1 (21) 21 0 (21) 0
= = = 0. 42 = = = 0
50 50 50 50
1(12) 12 0 (12) 0
= = = 0. 24 = = = 0
50 50 50 50
1 (5)5 0 (5) 0
= = = 0. 1 = = =0
50 50 50 50
1(1) 1 0(1) 0
= = = 0. 02 = = = 0
50 50 50 50
62
∑( − ) ²
×²=
5 4 3
(5 − 5.72)² (5 − 4.18)² (1 − 0.88)²
= = 4.18 = 0.88
5.72
= 0. 0906 = 0. 1609 = 0. 0164
( 12.6667 − (5.3333 − 7.98)² (2 − 1.68)²
10.92)² = 7.98 =
= 1.68
10.92 = 0. 8778 = 0. 0610
= 0. 2794 (5.3333 − 4.56)² (0.6667 − 0.96)²
(6 − 6.24)² = 4.56 = 0.96
= 6.24 = 0. 1311 = 0. 0896
= 0. 0092 (2.6667 − 1.9)²
= (0.3333 − 0.4)²
(2 − 2.6)² 1.9 =
= 0.4
2.6 = 0. 3094
= 0. 1385 = 0. 0111
(0.6667 −
(0.3333 − 0.52)² 0.38)² (0 − 0.08)²
= 0.52 = =
0.38 0.08
= 0.0670 = 0. 2163 = 0. 08
∑ = 0.5847 ∑ = 0. 2581
∑ = 1. 6297
2
(0 − 0.22)² 1
= = 0(0)²
0.22
= 0. 22 0
=0 Df = (Row-1) (Column-1)
(1 − 0.42)²
= 0.42 0(0)² Df = (5-1) (4-1)
= 0
= 0. 8009
=0 Df = (4) (3)
(0 − 0.24)²
= 0.24 0(0)² Df = 12
= 0
= 0. 24
=0
(0 − 0.1)²
= 0.1 0(0)² x2 Tabular @ 0.05 = 21.026
= 0
= 0. 1
(0 − 0.02)² =0 x2 = 0.5847+1.6297+0.2581
= x2= 2.4725
0.02 0(0)²
= 0
= 0. 02 x2= 2.473
∑ = 1.3809 =0
6
COLLEGE
CURRICULUM
VITAE

Final Na To Sana Final Na Nga To

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Final Na To Sana Final Na Nga To

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

VALENZUELA CITY POLYTECHNIC COLLEGE i

Kamagong Street Fortune Village Parada Valenzuela

6-IN-1 RETRACTABLE MASON AND

This technological research entitled “6-IN-1 RETRACTABL MASON

MS. MARY GRACE R. MAGANA

Approved in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree

DR. DONATO S. GALLEGO

ENGR. FLORINO T. OIGA MS. MARY JOY I. TIVIDAD

MS. MARY GRACE R. MAGANA

Accepted and approved in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the

DR. MARICEL F. MAURICIO DR. YOLANDA G. GADON

The researchers would like to express them gratitude to the following

accomplish this research:

backbone of this research.

taking time to provide the necessary answers and providing theirinformation.

knowledge, support, and suggestions especially during the oral defense.

Title: 6-in-1 Retractable Mason and Carpentry Tool.

Researchers: Balagot, Klien A.

Adviser: Ms. Mary Grace R. Magana

Course: Bachelor of Technical Teacher Education Major

This study focused on the level of acceptability of 6-in-1 Retractable

Mason and Carpentry Tool. There were fifty respondents composed of

Valenzuela City. The study employed experimental and descriptive methods.

in terms of affordability, durability, and portability were accepted by the

Retractable Mason and Carpentry Tool as perceived by the respondents when

their demographic profile is considered such as age and year of experience.

accepted together with findings of no significant difference in the level of

acceptability of the product as perceived by the respondents.

CHAPTER I: THE PPROBLEM AND ITS BACKGROUND AND REVIEW OF

CHAPTER II: METHODOLOGY

CHAPTER III: PRESENTATION, ANALYSIS, AND INTERPRETATION OF DATA

CHAPTER IV: SUMMARY FINDINGS, CONCLUSION AND

Table 5.1: Summary of tally according to Age in terms of Affordability.................39

THE PROBLEM AND ITS BACKGROUND AND REVIEW OF RELATED

developed a 6-in-1 Retractable Masonry and Carpentry Tool.

According to Gallantry's Buyer's Guide (2016). Multi-tools are tremendous for

direction. A multi-tool can be the difference between peril and success.

The flow of the study is shown in the paradigm below:

3. Is there any significant

Figure 1. Research Paradigm

Retractable Mason and Carpentry tool as perceived by the respondents in terms of

acceptability of 6-in-1 Retractable Mason and Carpentry tool as perceived by the

respondents when their profile is considered.

The process box contains the Survey, Experimental Analysis, and

Assessment of data gathered, analysis, and interpretation

STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM

Carpentry tool in decreasing weight of construction tools

Specifically, it sought to answer to the following questions.

1. What is the demographic profile of the respondents in terms of:

1.2. Years of work experience

2. What is the level of acceptability of 6-in-1 Retractable Mason and Carpentry

tool in terms of:

Mason and Carpentry tool to the other multi-purpose tools?

HYPOTHESIS OF THE STUDY

There is no significant difference in 6-in-1 Retractable Mason and Carpentry

respondents are considered.

SIGNIFICANCE OF THE STUDY

Construction Workers - For them to gain knowledge about other multi-

Civil Technology Students - To be knowledgeable to the tools they have not

researchers whose study is in connection of A 6-in-1 Retractable Mason and

SCOPE AND DELIMITATION

The intent of this study is to determine the level of acceptability of 6-in-1