This document contains a rubric for evaluating oral presentations. It assesses students on content, organization, and speaking skills. For content, it evaluates how well the information is connected to the topic. For organization, it considers the logical order and flow of ideas. For speaking skills, it examines the student's expression, enunciation, and whether they speak in complete sentences. The rubric provides ratings from excellent to unacceptable for each criterion to guide scoring.
This document contains a rubric for evaluating oral presentations. It assesses students on content, organization, and speaking skills. For content, it evaluates how well the information is connected to the topic. For organization, it considers the logical order and flow of ideas. For speaking skills, it examines the student's expression, enunciation, and whether they speak in complete sentences. The rubric provides ratings from excellent to unacceptable for each criterion to guide scoring.
This document contains a rubric for evaluating oral presentations. It assesses students on content, organization, and speaking skills. For content, it evaluates how well the information is connected to the topic. For organization, it considers the logical order and flow of ideas. For speaking skills, it examines the student's expression, enunciation, and whether they speak in complete sentences. The rubric provides ratings from excellent to unacceptable for each criterion to guide scoring.
NAME OF STUDENT: ___________________________________________ SECTION/GROUP: _______________________________ DATE: ____________________
HA/Ana- CRITERIA EXCELLENT (4) ACCEPTABLE (3) MINIMAL (2) UNACCEPTABLE (1) MCN Pedia Pharma Funda TFN CHN Physio • Abundance of material • Adequate • Some information not • Information included clearly related to topic information about the connected to the topic has little connection to CONTENT • Points clearly made topic the topic • Many good points made • Information well • Most information • Ideas loosely connected • No apparent logical organized and logically presented if logical • Organization and flow order of information in ORGANIZATION ordered order choppy and somewhat presentation • Argument easy to follow • Argument generally difficult to follow • Conclusion clear clear and easy to follow • Poised, enthusiastic, and • Engaged during • Little or no expression • Appears disinterested confident during the presentation • Enunciation not always during revalida SPEAKING SKILLS revalida • Speaks mostly in clear • Hard to understand • Uses complete sentence complete sentences • Speaks mostly in • Enunciates clearly sentence fragments
TOTAL SCORE
CLINICAL INSTRUCTOR’S SIGNATURE
RUBRICS FOR ORAL REVALIDA
NAME OF STUDENT: ___________________________________________ SECTION/GROUP: _______________________________ DATE: ____________________
HA/Ana- CRITERIA EXCELLENT (4) ACCEPTABLE (3) MINIMAL (2) UNACCEPTABLE (1) MCN Pedia Pharma Funda TFN CHN Physio • Abundance of material • Adequate • Some information not • Information included clearly related to topic information about the connected to the topic has little connection to CONTENT • Points clearly made topic the topic • Many good points made • Information well • Most information • Ideas loosely connected • No apparent logical organized and logically presented if logical • Organization and flow order of information in ORGANIZATION ordered order choppy and somewhat presentation • Argument easy to follow • Argument generally difficult to follow • Conclusion clear clear and easy to follow • Poised, enthusiastic, and • Engaged during • Little or no expression • Appears disinterested confident during the presentation • Enunciation not always during revalida SPEAKING SKILLS revalida • Speaks mostly in clear • Hard to understand • Uses complete sentence complete sentences • Speaks mostly in • Enunciates clearly sentence fragments