Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Subham Pandey Project+Submission Leadership
Subham Pandey Project+Submission Leadership
A) Intrinsic Motivators
Intrinsic motivators lead to employees doing a given task
because it will reward them. In this case, employees already
know that there will be direct rewards after completing such
task. These kinds of motivations are made to bring about
achieving long term objectives.
The CEO can use the following intrinsic factors to motivate the
teams.
Autonomy
Autonomy is an intrinsic factor that will take multiple
forms. It must improve on engagement in the workplace.
It is one of the satisfying aspects of an individuals
performance. The CEO can create autonomy through
various ways i.e. communicate a clear vision to the
team, give them tools to work, take a step back, wait for
employees to work and support the professional
judgement.
Mastery
It is an intrinsic motivator that involves getting better at
something that matters. It means doing the best things
you like and doing them perfectly. The CEO can bring
about mystery motivation by giving them members a
10% of their to do projects. They Take steps and give up
some control to ensure teams autonomy is guaranteed.
B) Extrinsic Motivators
Extrinsic motivators involve an employee completing a task
because of outside forces such as receiving a reward or fear of
punishment. This type of motivation is more beneficial because
it can motivate employees to complete unpleasant tasks.
Example of extrinsic motivators include:
Competition for money
To motivate employees, the CEO can promise the team
some money to ensure they commit themselves to the
project i.e, the best performing employee can be given a
certain amount, the second and third best performing
Frequent flyer rewards
In this case, the CEO can promise employees to take
them out for a tour and visit several places of choice
upon completing the specific task. In this case
employees will be highly motivated and take the project
and do the expected
Question III 3. Evaluate the 'conflict' and 'commitment' dysfunction of the
FineArt team quoting two strong instances from the case study
(150-200 words)
a. 2 instances of conflict dysfunction and its evaluation
b. 2 instances of commitment dysfunction and its
evaluation
The first evidence of conflict dysfunction was when Ray and Randy
clashed over team consensus. Ray asserts that teamwork never
occurred, whereas Randy describes consensus as mediocre.
Randy believed that individuals are better at doing great work rather
than a team effort. He was full of ego and continuously put down the
ideas of his teammates. There was always a conflict of interest from
Randy’s side which created negatively among the team a good amount
of trust within team members could not be built in Eric was passive and
did not address the issues developing in the team in time. Due to lack
of dispute resolution techniques, the team becomes demotivated and
unproductive.
Question IV 4.
a. Analyse Jack Derry as an inspirational leader of his
organisation under sensing, relating, visioning and
executing (100-150 words)
b. Recommend any changes or alternative steps that Jack
Derry could have taken to be a more effective leader
(100-150 words)
Visioning
Relating
Jack Derry has engineered his relationship with members and
has reinforced his networking so as to be an honest leader.
Mutual trust, courtesy and respect. He ought to pay beyond
regular time with Eric rather than exploit to Eric to work out
everything. He knew a way to strategically reposition Eric.
However, those dynamics would have clothed may are planning
higher
Executing
A leader must have precise execution plans to induce sensible
results. Execution is all concerning mastering the idea to show
plans into substantive and profit yielding results and conjointly
involves the team mebers to figure towards constant
b.
Jack may have some open table discussion with the team
members
Electoral by Eric completely different opinion in open forum.
Define role of Randy as team participant of his brilliancy
instead of confirming as H.P.
Do daily meetings with Eric and take regular feedback of team
members.
Provide a lot of space to Eric on Randy purpose to ready
organisation