Chapter 1

- Science of a Unified Universe -

Is there a scientific solution that can unite all reas of science so they may be understood holistically
rather than as separate compartmentalized forces?

In this series, Nassim Haramein offers a fundamental model to unify all forces so we as humanity can
unlock the mysteries of our reality here on Earth and within the universe at large.

But first, some context.

NASSIM HARAMEIN:

Modern physics has a fragmented view of our universe. It thinks of our universe as a set of equation,
a set of understanding that describes the big stuff and a whole different set of understanding that
describe the small stuff.

Yet the universe is one thing.

And the small stuff makes up the big stuff. So there must be a unified understanding of physics out
there. In ancient knowledge, in ancient civilization, in ancient wisdom, there was that unified view. It
was usually in most of these civilizations gathered around one simple principle, a principle that said
that, at the base of creation, there is a fundamental energy.

They called it chi.

They called it prana.

The Egyptian called it ka.

And it was the source of all creation. It was at the base of all the physics we observe and the forces.
Nothing could happen without that energy. The problem there is that we started to divide all the
science into pieces, smaller and smaller pieces so that scientists could have a very high focus on one
little piece of the puzzle.

And what happens when we do that is we lose the global view. We lose the holistic view of the system.
We lose the connection between all of the pieces of the puzzle. We don't necessarily understand how
cosmology affects biology, how quantum theory affects awareness or consciousness. So everything
becomes discontinuous. We've lost the ability to have a unified view of the mechanics of our universe,
never mind a unified view of our existence in it or even of our relationship with each other.

We can do something over here. And it's not affecting anything over there because they're not related,
when we see, in fact, in natural system that everything seems to be interrelated and interconnected.

So in order to unify physics, we must find what is the point of unification. And that's where ancient
civilization had this link between the two, had this fundamental understanding of unification of the
forces of nature. And it came from this fundamental view that spacetime is an energy that connects
everything. Think of space as being full instead of empty. And think of the stuff in space as being part
of this fullness of space, not something separate but something that emerge from this energy in space.

1
In modern physics, we have all these principles, these forces, for instance – gravity, electromagnetism,
the strong force, the weak force. But at the base of modern physics, there is nothing that explains
where these forces come from.

For instance, we have no physics to describe the origin of even the Big Bang, the emergence of our
universe, the emergence of spacetime, never mind what is the structure of spacetime made of.

To me, this was a big hole in our understanding. It's like we wrote modern physics in mid-air without a
foundation, without knowing what's producing all this. And when we try to solve quantum equations
for the field at the very, very fine level of the structure of space, we found that there was almost infinite
amount of energy there. And we called it vacuum fluctuations. So it's a little deceiving. Because when
you think vacuum, you're thinking empty. You're not thinking full. What science has found is that, when
we look at the vacuum at the very fine level of the quantum state, the vacuum is fluctuating with an
almost infinite amount of energy, a significantly large number – 10 to the 93 grams per centimeter
cubed.

The vacuum density, better known as the Planck density at the quantum scale, is enormous. 10 to the
93 grams per centimeter cubed is more than if we take all the stars in the universe, all the galaxies
combined and compress them down to 1 centimeter cubed. Imagine how energetic that would be.

Well, that's still 30 orders or 39 orders of magnitude less dense than the density of the energy of the
electromagnetic fluctuation at the state of the vacuum in the quantum world.

Well, imagine if I looked at all of the frequencies, all of the wavelength of all the electromagnetic field
in the space, in the field between us. And I tried to analyze, where does it stop?

How short can the wavelength get, right?

Well, when I add all this up in quantum field theory, I get almost an infinite amount of energy
fluctuation in the space.

You could think of that energy as a fundamental source of creation. In certain words, in certain
tradition, it could be called god. It has all the same attributes.

If you ask someone, what would you describe god as?

Typically, they'll say, omniscient, omnipotent. It's everywhere. It knows everything. It's the creating
power of everything, right.

If this energy is there and it's truly the source of the material world, then it could be described as the
god force or the energy that creates all of the world, all of creation. The only difference, and this is an
important distinction, is that the fluctuation, the energy of this energy is actually the result of all things
in the universe interacting with each other. It's not coming from somewhere else. It is the source of
everything interacting with each other from infinitely big to infinitely small.

It's a continuum of interaction. The whole thing is one thing. There is not matter here and space here.
There is this fundamental energy in various dynamics of it, producing the effects that we see as gravity,
as matter, as electromagnetism, as electricity, and so on. And so now we start to get a unified view of
this fundamental concept.

When we analyze a system in physics, we tend to assume that this system is isolated from all other
systems in the universe. And so it creates this view that is very artificial relative to the universe.
Because, for instance, in the universe, we see a lot of evidence of the contrary. We see a lot of evidence
of the universe producing order. Look at a human being for example. They're between 30 to 40 trillion

2
cells, all functioning together perfectly. They divided the rate of 2.5 million cells per second with 37,000
billion, billion chemical reactions every second managing the entire body's system. Highly organized
thermodynamic carnal engine, you burn that almost 100 degree Fahrenheit, 24/7 for all of your life,
expanding energy in a very coherent way. Any variation of those variables, any variation of your
temperature of the chemistry of your body and all, and you're having a really bad day, right.

So there's a lot of evidence of order.

Look at biology around the planet, the interrelationship of all the species and all this very complex,
highly ordered systems. So it's not isolated. This system is not isolated. When I calculate the energy or
efficiency of a turbine in a hydroelectric dam, I calculate the gravitational potential of the water in the
lake above it. And I calculate the water going down into the turbine and then the entropy of the turbine
transferring that gravitational potential into electricity. And then I assume this to be a closed system.
And I say, oh, I have missed one part of the equation. And if I open the box, I take the system out of
isolation. And I open the box. I realize that the water continues to go down the river.

And because the sun is shining and the Earth is spinning, the water is being evaporated. And then it's
raining down or snowing down. And it's flowing back into my lake. And now I realize there is a
continuous energy exchange where I am only looking, if I only look at the turbine, at my little device in
that grader dynamics of the flow of creation.

Another way to understand the interrelationship of highly ordered systems is to examine the concept
of ether.

Typically, when we talk about ether in modern physics, people are referring to this ancient concept of
an ether that has fluid dynamics. And it's used by Newton to describe gravity and, eventually, James
Clerk Maxwell to describe the electromagnetic field, the Maxwell's equations. That was discarded by
the Michelson and Morley experiments. And that has no validity anymore. There is a problem in this
way this experiment was done. That is an interferometer with the precision that was able to achieve
at the time would not be able to detect an ether that is occurring at the Planck scale, where we describe
this vacuum fluctuation occurring.

This is a scale that's billions and billions and billions of times smaller than an atom. The concept
suggests that, if there is ether, the drag of this ether should be measurable as the Earth moves through
it.

Think of frame dragging. Frame dragging is an effect on space time, predicted by Einstein's general
theory of relativity, that is due to non-static, stationary distributions of mass energy.

A stationary field is one that is in a steady state. But the masses causing that field may be non-static or
rotating, for instance. But imagine that, if the drags of these frames is very, very fine near the surface,
it would be very difficult to detect. Now, do we know that the frames are dragging, as in spacetime
dragging behind the planet?

We do.

We measured it now. But we didn't measure it with an interferometer on the surface of the planet,
like Michelson and Morley. We measured it with a laser being emitted from the surface of the planet
to a satellite in orbit so that there would be enough distance that we could measure the frame
dragging. And because the ether was removed and spacetime was introduced and then spacetime
predicted frame dragging and we measured the frame dragging but the frame dragging measurements
was never reunified with the concept of the ether.

3
So people in physics, when they talk about ether, they think of this thing that is ancient and that we
don't use anymore in physics. But, in fact, we both have vacuum fluctuation at the quantum level in
physics that act very much like an ether. And we have measured the frame dragging of spacetime,
which would be the drag of the ether. So, just to be clear, frame dragging that has been measured in
space time, frame dragging of spacetime, may be actually the drag of the ether that we are measuring.

So people talk about space. They talk about matter in the space, right. And then they talk about ether.
And they might even talk about gravity being the curvature of space. I believe, from what we found,
that, actually, all these things are the same thing, right. When we look at matter, what are we looking
at?

Well, we're looking at 99.999999999 percent space, right?

So space and matter is not very different. There is only 0.000001 of a percent difference than when
we look at what makes up matter really closely, the stuff that's not the space. All we see is electrostatic
fields or electromagnetic fields interacting.

So, really, it's just all space with electrostatic field interacting. And if the space is not empty, then that
means that it's all ether and that the electromagnetic or electrostatic field that we see as matter is just
a function of the dynamics of that ether and that gravity is the function of that ether and so on.

Now, it's more appropriate to describe it as quantum fluctuations. So we can change the terminology.
But we're talking about fluctuations at the quantum scales in the space that is the source of everything.
And it's really hard to wrap your head around it because we have a tendency to isolate space from
matter, from mass, from gravity, from electromagnetic field. We have all these little boxes. But what
we're finding is that all these box and we have solved these equations now.

I'm about to publish a whole new set of equation that are an expansion from earlier equations that I
wrote that solves all this, gives the correct value for masses, or charge, for gravity, for all the things we
see in the universe, including galaxies, clusters, stars, universes, and temperatures. And so it's unified.
We have solved this. And we're about to publish it. But, as well, the center part has been solved,
showing that there is no differences between these things. You cannot get mass without space. And
you can't get space curving without mass. And you can't get mass and space without electromagnetic
fields and that they're all connected through this dynamic structure of the quantum vacuum
fluctuations.

So to understand some of the intricacy that we're developed in the beginning of quantum physics and
the misconception that emerged as a result of the lost of this fundamental energy in the space, this
ether, one of the best example is the Copenhagen interpretation of the double-slit experiment.

The Copenhagen interpretation was first posed by physicist Niels Bohr in 1920. It says that a quantum
particle doesn't exist in one state or another but in all of its possible states at once. It's only when we
observe its state that a quantum particle is essentially forced to choose one probability. And that's the
state that we observe. Since it may be forced into different observable states each time, this explains
why a quantum particle behaves erratically.

NASSIM: So we were shooting particles at the slit. And we got one result on the backboard where the
particles were being recorded. And we put two slits. And we got a different result. All of a sudden,
instead of particles, it appeared like waves. And then we tried to put an instrument there to try to
figure out what was happening with the particles that was making those result. And then we got a third
result. And so, all of a sudden, there was confusion.And because it was thought that, all of a sudden,
we don't know if a particle can be a particle or a wave.

4
And when they're measured, it changes them. And so it was like all this seems so unusual. And,
certainly, with the lost of the concept of the ether, it was not easy to explain.

Well, there is another way to interpret the double-slit experiment. The fact that if you shoot one
particle at the slit, it makes little dots on the backboard as if it's particle. And then if you put two slits,
it makes wave interaction on the backboard as if there was a wave all of a sudden, is most likely
because, when you move a particle in a field that acts like a fluid, you're making waves. So, of course,
the particles that appears to be a particle and a wave.

This is thought to be a theory that was developed by a great French physicist Louis de Broglie that
worked with Bohm as well that Bohm brought forward as well later on.

And de Broglie said, well, this can be described in fluid dynamics. And it was called the pilot-wave
theory. And so it was not until, actually, recently that was realized, that if you put little beads of silicone
on a surface of silicone fluid and you shoot those beads at the slit and put one slit and then you put
two slit, you'll get all the same result.

Just like a boat on the ocean makes wave when you have two slits, the wave goes through the second
slit and interact with the waves of the first slit. And it creates interference pattern.

So, all of a sudden, instead of all this quantum woo-woo, you can explain the double-slit experiment
with simple fluid dynamics of a fundamental ether in the space. And the part in which, when you make
measurements, it changes it is because anything that's in that vacuum fluctuation field will make waves
as well.

So when you put something there to make the measurement, you're making waves in the field. So
these waves interact or interfere with the waves of the particle. And now you get a third result. And
so this all can be explained-- including quantum tunneling and all the effects we see that led to the
Copenhagen interpretation can be explained with pilot-wave theory and the concept that space is not
empty and it's full.

Now, for some people that are into consciousness study, trying to understand awareness and all this,
which uses the double-slit experiment and the Copenhagen interpretation to prove that consciousness
has an impact on matter, that might seem discouraging that all of a sudden, oh, this was the bad
interpretation.

And, actually, it's just because it's a fluid. Well, actually, it leads to a better understanding on how
consciousness or awareness can influence the field because it shows that the field is influenced by
everything influencing everything. It's not consciousness influencing the particle or the particle
influencing consciousness. It's all influencing. All you have is this fundamental field. And when it moves,
it changes things, it modifies things. And it produces forces. And it produces masses. And it does all
this stuff.

And I just want to make clear that I'm not just talking about philosophically here. These equations have
been solved. We can show this in experiment. We can see show that, now with this new view when
we reintroduce the ether in terms of quantum fluctuation in the vacuum and we solve this equation,
now we start to describe, we start to find the foundation, the foundation of mass, the foundation of
gravity, the foundation of electromagnetism, and so on.

Another example on how physics get fragmented and then the pieces get lost and not put back
together-this is really important. It's at the foundation of our understanding of quantum theory. And
it's now at the leading edge of our understanding of relativity. And that is black body radiation.

5
Quantum theory started when, actually, Max Planck was trying to understand the filament of a light
bulb a little better so we could make better light bulb. And he was using classical theory at the time to
try to describe the temperature or the heat or the radiation that comes off the filament of a light bulb.
And these earlier equations said that the light bulb should emit an infinite amount of radiation in the
ultraviolet spectrum.

Now, this was deemed the ultraviolet catastrophe. And so it was a big problem. Max Planck went at it
and tried to solve it. And the only thing you could come up with was adding this weird fudge factor in
the equation that basically quantized the electromagnetic field or the radiation of a black body. All
objects with the temperature above absolute zero emit energy in the form of electromagnetic
radiation.

A black body is a theoretical or model body, which absorbs all radiation falling on it, reflecting or
transmitting none. It is a hypothetical object, which is a perfect absorber and a perfect emitter of
radiation over all wavelengths.

NASSIM: He found that, if he added this little quantity, which eventually became the Planck's constant,
it would quantized the radiation or the heat coming off this black body and give the correct answer for
the emission spectra of a light bulb.

And so he said - he published it.

He thought it was atrocious. He said it, hopefully, there'll be a better solution found because it was not
instinctively correct, right. It didn't seem right because it basically said that radiation comes off in little
packets that was quantized.

Eventually, Einstein used this concept to describe the photoelectric effect where he said these little
quantities he called photons are knocking electrons out of semiconductors and creating the electric
effect that we measure.

And this is actually what Einstein got the Nobel Prize on.

This whole part of physics in quantum theory developed independently. Then the part in which Einstein
was writing the equation for gravity, which is called general relativity, in that part of the equation,
something emerged that was similar but that was found so far removed from the black body radiation
of quantum theory that it was never associated with it.

And that is that, when you solve the Einstein field equations at the cosmological level, you find that
spacetime can make objects that are now called black holes, which is very similar to a box, that would
absorb all the light.

A black hole is a region of space in which the density is so high, the energy density is so high that light
cannot emerge from it. It just falls in. And so all light incident on a black hole is absorbed. Just like a
black body, a black hole is a perfect black body. The thing is, when a black hole absorbs, it radiates a
little bit of heat as well. So it is like a black body in quantum theory. And so the black holes were never
confirmed until the early '90s, right.

Einstein didn't believe they could exist. Although his equation predicted them, they were not called
black holes until John Wheeler coined them black holes, which is much later.

So, basically, these two concepts were never put together. But think about it. If science was not
fragmented, eventually these two phenomenons would be put together and realize, wow, maybe the
quantum world is related to black hole physics. Maybe subatomic particles are mini black holes. And

6
this is why the constant we use, which is Planck's constants, which is based on black body radiation,
maybe this is why it acts that way is because those are mini black holes.

And all of a sudden, you would start to get a sense that there is a common relationship between the
subatomic world and the cosmological world that has to do with black hole physics. So this last example
is a very clear example of how fragmented physics can lead to fragmented thoughts about our universe
and divisions between the small and the big. But what is the common thread there?

The common thread is that maybe, when we look at black holes, when we look at subatomic particles,
when we look at the dynamics of the world from the very small to the very big, we're just looking at
the dynamics of a spinning fluid of space, that we're just looking at the ether dynamics from very small
to very big acting in different ways but all from the same source, all from the same perspective.

What we call a black hole according to Nassim Haramein is simply the center of the vortex of a tornado
of ether.

NASSIM: And depending on the size of the vortex, that center singularity at the center of that vortex
is either big and we sit in cosmology or it's really small because it's a really small vortex and we see it
as a subatomic particle. But it's all ether spinning. And this is the part that we have to understand
better. And, as we do, then we can develop technology that will completely transform our energy,
resources on our planet, our capacity to survive, some of these larger difficulties that we are
experiencing today with our environment, with our population, and with our understanding of each
other of the world around us and the universe as a whole.

So, in this series, we are going to examine all these.

Chapter 2
- The Fullness of Space -

Many people think that space is empty. But is it? In this chapter, we explore the fullness of space and
what it means to our understanding of physics and the universe.

What is space? Really when we think about it, space is everywhere, as we saw. Atoms are mostly made
out of space. And the little jiggle that we call the material world is just an electrostatic field that's
interacting with each other and makes it seem solid. So basically, we have less solid and more solid
space.

When we talk about vacuum fluctuation in physics, people have a tendency to think we're talking about
a chamber that we pull all the air out and it's got a vacuum in there. That's not what we're talking
about. We're talking about the energy in the space, right? The vacuum fluctuation is the energy that
would still be there if you remove all the molecules in a vacuum chamber.

And so it's something that's already there. And it's not something that occurs only in a certain condition
or in a certain region or under certain vacuum condition. But it's basically the jiggle of space

7
everywhere, whether we're talking about space like intergalactic space or interstellar space or if we're
talking about space at the molecular structure like the space between atoms, the space inside the
atom, the space inside particles. All this space jiggle with electromagnetic fluctuation. And these
vacuum fluctuations appear in many different ways in physics.

When Paul Dirac wrote the equations for quantum field theory, it appeared that these fluctuations
were popping particles in and out of our reality continuously. This was described as the Dirac Sea, a
sea of energetic particle popping in and out of our reality continuously. And so they were deemed to
be virtual just because they're not in existence in our experience for a very long time. That doesn't
mean they're not there. The word virtual particles, here, does not mean that they're not real particles.
It just means that they're only there for a very short amount of time. And so these fluctuations are
essential to our equation in quantum theory.

Many of the subatomic particles are thought to emerge from these fluctuations. And this fluctuation
of the vacuum actually is the basis from which, for instance, Higgs was able to write his equation for
the Higgs-Boson and for the Higgs Interaction, the Higgs Field, which was thought to be the basis of
mass, or the emergence of mass.

So it really is omnipresent in quantum field theory, in quantum theory. And it is, as well, becoming
more and more utilized in our physics all over the place, including at the cosmological level when we
look at the surface of black holes and their dynamics. So it's really interesting that, for the first time as
well, we were able to observe the fluctuations of the vacuum at the cosmological level near the surface
of a neutron star.

It seems a little strange to think that particles can come from nothing, from the vacuum. The thing is
is that the vacuum is not nothing. In fact, we are not able to find anywhere in the universe where there
is nothing. There is always electromagnetic fluctuation. And this field, the quantum fluctuationbof the
vacuum at the quantum scale,bhas been deemed, as well, zero point energy, because even at 0 Kelvin,
these equations show that there would still be fluctuation. There's nowhere where we can stop the
vacuum from being the vacuum. This is very significant because it means that it's everywhere. And it's
fluctuating. That means it has energy everywhere. And this energy is non-trivial. It's a lot of energy.

When we look at the energy that we require to relate the energy of mass, gravity, the dynamic of our
universe, the creation of our universe, and so on, then all of a sudden we realize that there is a source
of energy that's already present that we call vacuum fluctuation, and that that source could be the
source of everything.

This means that there is nothing either than the vacuum, meaning that the vacuum fluctuations, when
they become coherent, are able to produce what we call as our material world.

Now, we will discuss that in more details. But these vacuum fluctuations, although their earlier
interpretation was thought to be completely random, we're discovering that they may not be random,
that they may be polarized and organized in certain ways that when they do become organized, they
produce what we call matter. And as matter get together, then the organization of this information
field, if you'd like, could become something that we understand as the source of what we call
awareness or consciousness.

So there's lots of implication to understanding these vacuum fluctuations, how they work, what's their
energy level, and very importantly as we describe, with the Casimir effect.

If enough of a gradient can be created in the structure of the vacuum, we can get the vacuum to
produce work for us as it moves through the gradient. When vacuum fluctuations push or pump the

8
Casimir plates back and forth, we can theoretically extract energy in what is called the Casimir effect.
Consider that if this is the energy that is producing all of our reality, then the amount of energy we can
extract is enormous.

Now, it's important to realize when we're talking about the vacuum, and we're talking about these
vacuum fluctuations, we're not just talking about vacuum out there or vacuum inside atoms. We're
talking about vacuum inside of you. You're made out of molecules. You're made out of atoms. And so
the space inside of you, which is 99.9999% percent you, is fluctuating as well. And this is a motion that
you may think as stochastic. And certainly, that's the way it's been thought of, meaning that it is
random, it has no organization.

And that's why, in general, it has been ignored, because it's thought to be irrelevant since it all cancels
out to the random function of it. In fact, science is discovering that there are regions of space that are
stochastic, or have random probability distribution or pattern that may be analyzed statistically, but
may not be predicted precisely. This is where the material cannot be seen. But it is observed that those
regions are organized. And that is where matter emerges. This might be, as well, the source of black
holes.

And matter might just be smaller black holes coming out of bigger black holes, and so on. And so there
is a whole new understanding of physics that emerge from realizing that these vacuum fluctuations
that you're made of may be the source of this material world and the energy of the material world that
is equal to mass, or the structure of reality. Although we think of these fluctuations as random,
randomness may only be an artifact of the sample that you're looking at.

Let me give you an example.

If you put your nose into a Persian rug, you're going to see particles of dust. And you're going to see
fibers of the wool that the carpet is made of. And you might see a few different colors of these other
fibers being there, and then grains of sand because the carpet is not perfectly clean, and dust, and all
this. You might look at all this, looked like a complete mess. And you might not be able to see a pattern
at all. And most likely, you won't. If you're looking close, you will not see a pattern. But then as soon
as you back up and you start getting more and more of the field of vision, then you start to see patterns.
You start to see that there's beautiful design of this rug. You see the colors actually working together
to produce this amazing design.

So when we look at the universe or we look at large portion of space, we might think that it all looks
random. But actually, if we looked big enough, we might actually find order in something as large as a
universe.

We've started to see something like that. We start to see large structure on the cosmological scales
when we look at super clusters. We see organization where they start to look like they're organizing
as huge octahedron, tetrahedron in the space, like a crystal. And we see organization, certainly, at the
molecular level.

What we're discovering is that when the structure of the vacuum itself is organized, it produces effects
that we see as our reality. And that is very profound because we realize that all of reality is part of one
thing that is organized by the structure of spin, by angular momentum, by the geometry of the field.

Imagine that you tried to define space. And you find that OK, well you can always divide to smaller and
smaller and smaller space. You would never reach the end. You can divide one in half, and then in
quarters, and then in eighths, and so on and so on and so on and so on. You will never arrive at the
end. If there is energy there, then it has an infinite potential. Clearly, this could be a source of energy

9
with infinite potential for humanity, a source of energy that would give us something that could be
thought of as gravity control.

There's all kinds of application in realizing that we are all bathing in this infinite, or very close to infinite,
level of energy that we call the vacuum. We're discovering that this vacuum energy is everywhere, and
that it's producing everything. And so we are starting to think maybe we can become vacuum
engineers. We can engineer the vacuum together to do a little bit of what we want it to do. And if we
are successful at this, the implications are amazing.

On an everyday level, what you should take away from this episode is that you are bathing in a field of
energy.Our body is made of that field of energy. It's called atoms, molecules, or cells. This field of
energy is flowing in and out of the human body continuously. When it flows out of you, you call it
thermodynamics. You call it the heat of your body and so on. When it's flowing into you, maybe you
call it thoughts and the energy that propels you throughout the day.

Becoming aware of this energy, becoming aware of this source of reality, allows you to maybe start to
manipulate it or start to interact with it in such a way that you feel more energized, you feel more
aligned, you feel more empathy for the rest of the things in the space. You start to feel nature. You
start to feel one with the structure of space instead of feeling isolated and separated. You feel unified
with the universe. And that might bring you a sense of comfort, a sense of connection that can lead
you to incredible discoveries and a sense of wellness that could be transformative in your life.

So this is really what I wanted to convey in these first few chapters, is that this is real. It's been
measured. It's there. We know it's there. And it's rapidly arriving to a place where myself and many
other scientists are realizing, wow. This could be the source of everything. And we're finally getting
there. And we can start to interact with it in a completely different way.

The separation we experience is really an illusion. Like for instance right now, we are interacting with
the background radiation of the galaxy. We might not be aware of it. But we are, because it's in the
space. We're interacting with all the electromagnetic fields and so on. There's all kinds of levels of
interaction that we're not directly conscious of, including more gross ones like the fact that we're
breathing and our heart is beating and our liver is doing its thing, kidneys are doing - there's all kinds
of things happening that we're not consciously manipulating. They're still happening. And so we are
discovering that we are profoundly deeper and more complex than initially we might interpret ourself.
And that depth and complexity emerge not from some philosophical ideas, but actually from, literally,
the mechanics of how the physical world emerge.

There is a concept that is common amongst truth seekers or people on the spiritual path that there
are spiritual things and there are material things. That, as well, is a concept of separation,
fragmentation, and isolation. Is it possible that what we call the spiritual world may just be the physics
that we have yet to understand about the physical world, which includes the information flows that
we call consciousness or awareness?

It's kind of a funny thing when we say I, because if this is all true and the space is full and it has infinite
division possibility, then everything has infinity in it. And saying I is a little bit confusing because when
you say I am who I am or I am one, which I do you mean? Do you mean you meaning all of your cells?
Do you mean you meaning all of your atoms and then all of your cells? Do you mean you meaning all
of your protons, and so on and so on and so on?

You can't really find the end of I or the beginning of I because you can divide to infinity. And to think
of yourself as a being with infinite potential might be a more accurate understanding of yourself. Then,

10
to think of yourself as just this agglomeration of cells that happened to come together a few years ago
and that will come apart in the next few years may not be an accurate description of who you are in
relationship to the universe as a whole.

At the deepest level, who are you?

Well, maybe you are the whole individualized into you. And so when you say I, you're only describing
one scale of you. There might be whole other levels of scales of you that you're not aware of because
we haven't understood this level of depth of reality that we are discovering now. And that depth and
complexity emerge not from some philosophical ideas, but actually from literally the mechanics of how
the physical world emerge.

The idea that there is spiritual things and there's material things is, as well, a concept of separation
and fragmentation and isolation. In fact, what we call the spiritual world in these views may just be
the physics that we hadn't understood, the dynamics of the physical world which includes the
information flow that we call consciousness or awareness.

Chapter 3
- Spinning Spacetime -

How fundamental is spin to the universe and our lives?

In this chapter, we explore the origin of spin and how spin produces everything in our world.

You will hear me say, everything is spinning. And you might disagree with that. It's not necessarily
obvious that spin is everywhere. Relative to you, things seem to be stable. They're not necessarily
spinning. However, if you look carefully, the things that you're seeing are made out of atoms that have
spin in them. And these atoms are on the planet that's spinning at about 1,000 miles per hour. And
that planet is spinning around the sun. And by the time you add that speed, the planet is going about
68,000 miles per hour. And the sun is inside a galaxy that's spinning. And so, by the time you add that
speed, everything is going at about 500,000 miles per hour. And then that galaxy's inside that cluster
that's spinning. And by the time you add that speed, you're at about 1,200,000 miles per hour. So
things are moving really, really quick and spinning at very high velocity. And it's not apparent to us.
Everything seems stable because weare looking at things relative to us that are spinning at the same
rate.

But everything is spinning. Spin is fundamental in the universe. You see it everywhere. Galaxies are
spinning. Planets, stars, everything is spinning. And there is something really deep about that.

Now, why would energy that's fluctuating make anything?

Meaning, it could be completely incoherent, stochastic, and just fluctuate and nothing would come
out of it. The only time something like that - an organization of fluctuation would occur is when there
would be a coherent pattern that would develop in that field.

11
Why would a coherent pattern develop in that field?

Why would there be islands of coherencies in that field?

Well, if there's a gradient in the density of that field, then there would be automatically spin that would
develop. So when we look at the vacuum density, these fluctuations, the vacuum density at the
cosmological size, which we are measuring, it's very low. It's 10 to the minus 30 grams per centimeter
cubed. And experimentally, when we look at the vacuum density at the quantum scale, we see that
the vacuum density of the quantum scale is very, very high - 10 to the 93 grams per centimeter cubed.

So there is a huge change in density. This change in density, in the standard model, has become the
biggest problem in physics. It's called the vacuum catastrophe. Quantum field theory predicts a very
large energy density for the vacuum. And this density should have large gravitational effects.

However, these effects are not observed, and the discrepancy between theory and observation is an
incredible 122 orders of magnitude. And this is the largest error in physics - considered the largest
error in physics. We just published paper showing, it's not an error at all. It's because when the universe
grows, the density drops in the vacuum density. And, of course, it produces this low density at the size
of the universe and very high density at the size of a proton. We made those calculations. And when
we calculated for those radiuses for the change of radius from the proton to the universe, we got the
right density that we're measuring in both cases.

It all works out beautifully. So we know that it's just a change of density in the vacuum that produces
this discrepancy between cosmological density of this ether of the vacuum and quantum density of
the vacuum. Imagine a change of density that high.

Think of a hurricane. So in the case of a hurricane, a very small slight change in temperature between
the surface of the water of the ocean and the atmospheric temperature, a few degrees, three degrees
will produce a very large energy event we call a hurricane, with large electromagnetic discharges,
millions of tons of materials spinning. And when we look at the hurricane, what do we see? A structure
that is very, very similar to what we see when we look at the galaxy, for instance.

Even in the case of a hurricane, which you would believe is a much lower energy level than a galaxy,
we see antimatter production at - they're called sprites, which are emanating from the center of a
hurricane. So we see these sprites of antimatter that is gamma emission is occurring at the center of
hurricane, where you wouldn't think there would be the energy levels to do that.

However, let's continue with the analogy. Think at that very small change in air density producing that
big of an energy event. Now, think about 122 orders of magnitude difference in the density of the
vacuum between the universe and the quantum world. It would spin the structure of space very
intensely from the universal size, all the way down to the quantum size. And this spinning is what
organizes this fundamental field into structures that we see as our reality. We've solved for this spin
vacuum structure from the universal size all the way down to the quantum size. We found that the
spin function, or the change of density, is spinning everything we see, all the way down to protons and
subatomic particle.

So really, everything we're seeing that we think is matter is actually space spinning. That's the only
thing we see. Now, the proof of that - and this is really important - is that by writing these equations
this way, we obviously got the mass for clusters, for super clusters, for galaxies, for planets, atoms,
subatomic particles. When we added the whole thing up, we got the correct mass for the universe. We
didn't get just the mass of the matter in the universe, but we got the mass of the universe, which
includes what is in the standard model called dark matter and dark energy.

12
So let me explain this a little bit. In the standard model, when they run the equations that we have for
cosmology, they end up with a deficiency of mass for the universe. 96% of the mass of the universe is
missing in the standard model equations for the universe to behave the way it does. At the time, they
just thought, there must be mass we can't see. There must be energy we can't see, so we're going to
call it dark energy and dark matter.

The dark matter was necessary for galaxies to stay together. Meaning, there wasn't enough mass that's
visible in the galaxy to hold the stars together, to have enough gravity for the stars not to spin out of
there. So they had to have 80% of the mass, the galaxy, in dark matter around the galaxy to keep the
mass high enough for the stars to stay in there.

They did the same thing with the universe. For the expansion of the universe to happen the way it is,
they had to add dark energy in the space, the vacuum fluctuation, in the space to make the expansion
of the universe the way it is.

So basically, the standard model equation can only account for 4% of the mass of the universe. All the
rest of the stuff is a fudge factor called dark energy and dark matter.

Dark matter is one of the universe's greatest mysteries. Something is out there generating gravitational
force that can't be accounted for by detectable matter. And even though detectors have been built
with all kinds of experiments to try to detect dark matter, they still haven't been able to find it.

The problem is with the equation, not with the universe. And so, our equation gives the correct mass
because it doesn't just consider the matter. It considers that the matter is made out of these vacuum
fluctuations, and it consider all of the vacuum fluctuations in the universe.

Think of a galaxy. All the stars and the dust and the plasma in that galaxy makes up what we think of
the mass of the galaxy. But when we calculate that, as I said, we end up deficient in the mass for the
galaxy to behave that way. The galaxy spin, like there is solid body. Well, that's because what we see
in the galaxy is just the stuff that's stuck in the spin of the vacuum structure, the spacetime of this
super fluid. And we then calculate that in the standard model equations when we calculated the mass.
So, of course, we're missing most of the mass because we're missing the source of the spin.

Think of it as a dark coffee or a really dark tea. And you spin it with your spoon in the morning before
you put the milk.vTake out the spoon, and you won't be able to see the coffee spin. Imagine that you
think of the coffee in the cup as empty space because you don't know it's there. And then put the milk
in it, and you'll see like a shape just like a galaxy emerge in the middle of your coffee. It's like the
standard model has only calculated the milk and is missing the coffee.

So of course, the equation ends up with the wrong mass for the whole thing, because it's missing most
of the energy level that makes that phenomenon happen.

The structure of spacetime is the only thing that exists. The only thing that makes up our reality is the
spin of this vacuum fluctuation producing super clusters, clusters, galaxies, stars, planets, atoms,
subatomic particle, all the way down to the Planck field, and even the sub-Planck. It most likely spins
into infinity and produces singularity. This is how everything comes to exist.

When you look around you at the biological level, you will see the spin if you observe very closely, like
the fluids moving through the trunk of a tree. The way flowers and plants emerge, the spin that
emerged. The Fibonacci theory that you can see everywhere that produce the spiral that we see
everywhere in the fractal structure of nature. Even the spin of your blood inside your body, going
through all your arteries and veins. The spin of air as it spins into your lungs as you inhale, as you exhale

13
as well. The spin of our weather system and the structure of the coriolis forces of our atmosphere. You
will see spin everywhere, because spin originates from this gradient density change in the structure of
the vacuum that spins everything into existence.

And so imagine you're taking a bath, and imagine that you have a rubber ducky in your bath. And you
have the rubber ducky far away from the drain, and you pull that drain. And you observe that in that
region, there is a coherent structure that's being generated by the gradient in the drain, by the change
in density in the drain. Air is coming out, and the water is going down. The air coming out spins up. The
water going down spins down. And if you were to look at the structure of the water, all the molecules
of the water in that region of space, they would all be co-moving in a coordinated manner. Your rubber
ducky over there doesn't feel that the spin of the drain because it's too far away from it. But if you
bring it closer, it will get caught in that co-moving structure, and it will orbit the drain. This is very much
what Einstein field equation describes.

Einstein field equation looks at the surface of the water in our analogy and the surface of the water
curving towards the drain as the source of gravity, as the source of the effect that the rubber ducky is
falling towards the drain. But we know from our analogy that it's not just the surface of the water
curving. That that is a secondary effect of the water spinning, of all the molecules of water spinning.
This is the error that was made. Einstein field equation assume that the surface of the water is like a
continuous surface. Of course, you in your bath, looking at the drain from in the water and your rubber
ducky, the surface of the water appears smooth, continuous. But you know that if you put the water
under a microscope that it's made out of particles, discrete pieces. These discrete pieces spin together
and makes what appears to be smooth curvature on the surface so the source of this spin, or the source
of the gravitational effect, is actually the water spinning.

This is what I discovered is that spacetime is not smooth. Spacetime at the quantum level is discrete -
made of teeny little particles. And they are very, very small. There are billions of times smaller than an
atom.bThey're at the Planck scale. The energy between these trillions and trillions of tiny particles
spinning and interacting together is what gives protons and neutrons their mass. Protons, along with
neutrons, are the nucleus of the atom, where the atom's mass is concentrated.

Well, we call it mass because we see an energy event that when they're together produce gravity. And
so we think there's mass and gravity and that those things are separate. But in fact, there's just
spacetime spinning, producing an effect we call a proton. And that proton produces a curvature in the
space. The spinning is the curvature, and that produces a gravitational effect. And this is why this
equation we wrote gives the correct mass for the universe without the need of dark matter and dark
energy and all this weird darkness, which I called the dark ages of physics. But actually, gives a correct
answer because it is calculating the source of the creation.

So now, I just explained to you the source of creation, and I can prove it to you because I have the
equations that give the right numbers. And what I mean by the right numbers, I mean, really, really,
really the right numbers, with very high level of accuracy. Including predictions, for instance, the
prediction of the radius of the proton, which is different than the standard model prediction,and that
has now been confirmed by experimental studies, which is really important for a theory to be able to
do predictions and to have them confirmed by experiments.

So this is very, very important. Now you understand the source of creation. This is a very profound
thing. You can think of it philosophically as something very profound. Because if you think of the spin
of creation producing you, producing your reality around you, being part of this spinning mechanism
of creation then you can interact with it in a very conscious way. It has a very deep implication as well
to technology.

14
If you realize that mass, energy, gravity is being generated by spinning spacetime, then you can go in
laboratory and figure out how to spin spacetime. That would maybe produce all kinds of effect that
could be very beneficial for humanity. And we'll discuss that and later on.

But what's important in this chapter is that you understand that all of your reality is the result of the
spin of this vacuum structure. And I'm not saying this lightly. It's very critical that you feel this within
yourself. I believe that many of the meditation techniques that were given to us by ancient civilization
and advanced masters around the world have to do with finding the center of that spin. Finding the
center singularity of the frame of reference of your spin. And so that would be the place from which
the center of your existence emerges. And since it has fractal spin to infinity, as we describe, you could
find deeper and deeper level of this center of spin that makes up your existence.

This is a much more philosophical, and you could say even spiritual description of what I'm describing
in physics. But the implication includes as well the dynamic in which these little particles, these Planck
particles are moving. And we're going to discuss that later, because it has implications as well to
consciousness and awareness.

That is, these particles that makes up the field are moving in very specific dynamic structure. A fluid
that's spinning produces coriolis effect. These coriolis effects produce spin, counter spin. They produce
toroidial systems. These torodial systems have particles falling in, particles coming out. And all of a
sudden, you start to see, oh, OK, so gravity is the water going in, and electromagnetism is the water
going out. And the radiation is the water going out. And now you're starting to see - and then if you
apply that to information theory, it starts to tell you that like there's some kind of information feedback
in the universe. And that leads, eventually, to the possibility of being able to explain consciousness
right out of these equations. And I want is really stress that I'm not talking about this in a very
philosophical way. I'm talking about this very formally in mathematics. And these formal mathematics
give the correct answer with high level of precision for all the scales in the universe, including the table
of elements. Think of the table of elements as having different spin rates within the vacuum structure,
producing different elements.

When Nassim and his team applied these equations to the table of elements, they got the periodic
table, but in a completely different way than from the traditional one. In this case, the table of element
is the result of spin rate changes in the gradient of the vacuum of spacetime and gives the right answer.

15
So we get all of the matter, all of the particles, all of creation that we see. But most importantly, the
equation tells us all that you're seeing and all that makes you and your world is all the result of one
thing. It unifies everything under one thing. And that is a very important concept that has been talked
about across the ages by masters, all the way through our history that there is oneness in the universe.
That everything is one. Well, this actually proves it. It's definitely clear that these equations, which are
very accurate and give the correct answers for all of the systems in the universe, are equations that
can eventually be utilized to maybe even create matter.

You could imagine even in a sci-fi way, a very, very advanced civilization that has used this
understanding to eventually create a galaxy or a universe or a multiverse. It's very enticing. When you
see these equations, these equations can give you the road map to engineer a universe. And this is
extremely powerful. And we will discuss the implication of that technology in furthere chapters.

And at the same time, it's really powerful conceptually to start to understand our universe in a way in
which we actually realize that the static appearance of our existence - the appearance that everything
that's stable and nothing is spinning is actually just an illusion because we're spinning at the same rate
as this stuff around us. And that spin is the fundamental force is a result of this gradient in the vacuum
structure and is the fundamental mechanics that produces all of our reality.

16
 Chapter 4
- Holographic Universe Theory -

What is the holographic principle, and how did it emerge?

In this chapter, we look at how to access the infinite field of information in our universe.

The holographic principle has been present throughout the ages, although it may have not been called
that way early on.

The concept that everything is present in everything, that from any point or any part of the universe,
you could get the information of the whole, has been present in ancient civilization traditions,
shamanism, and masters around the world in many different cultures. The concept of oneness has
been there all along. However, in the development of the holographic principle in standard physics,
we start the exploration with a famous physicist, David Bohm,which thought of the implicate and
explicate order of creation as this structure in which creation contained every piece of information of
the whole in every point. Every region contains the total structure unfolded within it.

He thought that all of the information of the universe would be present in every point. And this was
described in his exploration of the holographic principle early on.

Now, what is a hologram?

A hologram is an experiment or a setup in order to get a three-dimensional projection in space. It's

important to understand the holographic principle of physics is called that way only as an analogy. And
this is where people get mixed up, including physicists.

And so I'm going to make a very distinct separation between a hologram that we may call on Earth
here and the universe having a holographic principle. Those are two different things. However, the
hologram is a good analogy to most likely what the universe is doing.

To produce a hologram, a laser beam is split into two identical beams and redirected by the use of
mirrors. One of the split beams is directed at the object - in this example, an apple.

Some of the light is reflected off the object directly onto the photographic plate. The second beam is
directed onto the photographic plate. And when the two beams intersect and interfere with each
other, the interference pattern recreates a virtual 3D image of the apple in this space.

Interestingly, the word "hologram" comes from the Greek word "holos" - whole, or "grama" - message.
If a hologram is cut into pieces, each piece contains whole views of the entire holographic image. And
what's really amazing and interesting about this is that if you cut the plate in half and shoot the laser
at it, the apple is still going to appear. It's going to have lower resolution, but it's still going to appear.
And if you cut it in quarter and you should the laser at it, it's still going to have the apple. All the
information is still there. You can cut, theoretically, the plate to infinityand still have the information
of the apple.

So the concept is that every point contains the whole, which is a concept, as I said, that was already
present in ancient civilization all around the world, in shamanic cultures and so on.

17
Physics develop in such a way that we discovered that there is this possibility in the universe that black
holes could form. And this was very puzzling for physicists. Einstein's filled equations predicted that
black holes could form. Einstein himself didn't believe it could exist. He thought that part of the
equation is wrong. All the rest is working out, but most likely, a black hole cannot form. At the time,
the word "black hole" wasn't even coined. It was called a singularity. And it is the foundation of the
solution to Einstein's field equation. It's called the Schwarzschild solution to the Einstein field equation.

The Schwarzschild solution is the primary solution to Einstein field equation used to describe and
calculate gravity or orbitals of planets and stars. And so it's very much present, but it mostly ignored,
the part in which the mass of an object could have a density so high that the light could not even
escape from it. However, when black holes were discovered - but even before, when exploration about
that part of Einstein field equation was done - there was something puzzling. If light is falling into a
black hole, if information is falling into a black hole - so you can think of information and information
theory as particles falling into the black hole like photons that could carry information about their
velocity, their position, and so on. So you can think of particles as information in information theory.
There's a direct and analog between information and energy.

Then where is the information going?

When it goes into the black hole, where does it end up?

If the black hole can evaporate - and this is something that was the result of some of the exploration
that Stephen Hawking did on black holes. It's called Hawking radiation.

Hawking predicted that energy fluctuations from the vacuum cause the generation of particle-anti-
particle pairs of virtual particles near the event horizon of the black hole. One of the particles falls into
the black hole while the other escapes before they have the opportunity to annihilate each other.

The net result is that to someone viewing the black hole, it would appear that a particle had been
emitted. Since the particle that is emitted has positive energy, the particle that gets absorbed by the
black hole has negative energy relative to the outside universe. This results in the black hole losing
energy and thus mass.

Smaller primordial black holes can actually emit more energy than they absorb, which results in them
losing net mass.

Larger black holes, such as those that are one solar mass, absorb more cosmic radiation than they emit
through Hawking radiation.

Well, if it's losing energy and information is falling in, where is the information going to end up?

Where is it going?

And in the standard model of cosmology, which was Hawking's opinion and others, is that the
information is lost. But that violates some of the foundations of physics in which information cannot
be lost in quantum theory. And this was a big problem. There was what is commonly described as the
black hole information war that developed between quantum physicists and cosmologists, some
saying, no, the information is just lost, some saying all the information end up in a parallel universe
somewhere else, and quantum physicists saying, no, information cannot be lost.

The two main characters of this black hole war was Stephen Hawking and Leonard Susskind, which is
the director of the Physics Department at Stanford University. And the two were debating what
happens to the information in the universe. Eventually, with the help of other physicists, Leonard

18
Susskind, from little bit of a convoluted path of earlier physics that were written by Bekenstein and
others, develop a concept that is now known as the holographic principle.

This concept showed that the information that's falling into the black hole is holographically imprinted
on the surface of the black hole as Planck vacuum fluctuation. And here is our ether again at this nice,
centrally position, again reemerging, showing that the information is held in the structure of the
vacuum at the surface of the black hole. So it is not lost.The mathematics were written for it, and it
give the correct temperature for the entropy of the black hole, for the temperature of the black hole.
And so it was proven to be correct, or at least it has been theorized to be correct.

And eventually, Stephen Hawking conceded the bet that information could be retained on the surface
of the black hole, and the information was not lost. So Leonard Susskind and the holographic principle
became explored more and more by many, many physicists, and the concept became very much
embedded in the modern interpretation of black hole entropy and some of the most advanced and
most important mathematics and physics that are being explored today, including er equals epr,
showing that entanglement may be through black holes and that black holes are like little - entangled
by particles, saying that particles may be as well black holes.

But before we jump into all this, the holographic principle is something that I had developed in a
different way from the early physics that I had come up with. I had realized that this Planck field, this
ether is made out of teeny oscillators at the Planck scale. So you can think of them as discreteness,
granular structure of spacetime, that Einstein was correct to think that spacetime curved to produce
gravity, but spacetime is only smooth at large scale.

When you look closely, just like water in our tub - when you look at the water going down the drain, it
appears smooth, but when you look closely, it's made out of atoms, which is granular. Spacetime was
made of these granular structures. And I had come up with a little bit the same interpretation of the
holographic principle from a different perspective. But in my case, I had realized that the granular
structure of spacetime is not a 2D surface as in the current holographic principle, but that the grains
are little spheres, little particles. And it wasn't just on the surface of the black hole, but it was on the
interior of the black hole.

Spacetime and the vacuum structure is not excluded from the inside of the black hole. So I started to
think about this holographic principle and the granular structure of spacetime, the granular structure
of the vacuum fluctuation being this dynamic spin that produce particles - most importantly, the center
of the atom, the proton.

Think of the proton in the nucleus of the atom as being the center of the vortex of spacetime coming
in and making a little proton in the middle. So imagine all the information that's spinning together that
makes up a proton. I calculated that. I calculated how many Plancks are on the inside of the radius of
a proton. And I was amazed when I finished the calculation because the mass of all the little Plancks
inside the proton added up to the mass of the universe precisely.

So right away, it seemed holographic, which in principle means that all the information of the whole is
present in each point. And I was finding that. All the information, all the energy seemed to be present
in the Planck information inside the proton. Don't think of the universe being in there. Just think of the
information of the universe being in there, just like when you play a CD of a music orchestra, the violin
is not on the CD. The piano is not on the CD. The orchestra director or conductor is not on the CD. But
all of these things and the information are there, right? So think of the information being present
holographically in the Planck field. So you can imagine how small the Planck granular structure must
be to contain all the information of all of the other protons in the universe in one proton. But that's

19
what the equation was giving. But then I thought, wait a minute. That information is inside the mini
black hole, right? It's not able to come out. It's restricted by the information that's on the surface, the
entropy of the black hole. So then I looked at the relationship between the surface and the inside.

How much of the information inside could go through the surface?

I got a number which is the ratio between the two. I multiplied that number by the mass of 1 bit of
information, 1 Plank, to get the mass of the ratio. I got the exact mass of the proton. And when I
manipulated the equation, I got a radius for the proton, and that radius was 4% smaller than what is
predicted by the standard model.

And when I published this, then I predicted - and this was in December of 2012 - I predicted that when
we would measure the proton more precisely, we might find that smaller radius.

There was a result of these experiments that showed that the radius of the proton from muonic
scattering was smaller than predicted by the standard model. And my prediction was precisely that
new radius that was measured.

So that radius was confirmed, and my prediction was inside one standard deviation of the experiment.
So I was inside the margin of error of experiment. So my radius may have been even much more precise
than the experiment. This means fundamentally that the information network of the universe - the
spinning of this Plank field into existence in the universe - connects everything together since all the
information is present in one point in the center of an atom. So if that was true, then I should be able
to take that equation and extrapolate it to the rest of the universe.

That took me a while, of course. It's not simple. I'm describing this in simple terms. It gets complicated.
Basically, you can take this equation and apply it to the electron.

That I have published.

And it does the right radius and the right mass for the electron, and so on. It can be applied to the
whole universe, and it gives the right mass for the universe without the need of dark matter and dark
energy. It gives the right acceleration for the universe. And as we discovered just recently, it gives the
right temperature, and so on.

And when we write the equation in a more classical way using thermodynamics, you actually can get
from this equation all of the scales in our universe, including superclusters, clusters, galaxies, stars,
planets. So we get everything in the universe emerging from this holographic view of creation.

Now, I want to make sure I make this distinction again. It's not a holographic plate somewhere in the
universe projecting a holographic creation. It is all of the interference pattern of spacetime of the
Planck field creating the interference weaving of the information in the universe producing this
holographic effect. Pushing the holographic analogy to a 2D surface projecting our universe is wrong.
And it's been done by physicists and scientists out there misleading and overreaching the analogy.

That is not the case.

The fact that the universe is holographic is because of the natural behavior of the nature of the
oscillation structure of the field that makes up our universe. Every scale has the development of a little
black hole or a large black hole, like the center of a galaxy or the center of an atom. And it's basically
black holes all the way up and all the way down.

One of the evidence for this is that when we solve these equations for our universe, it clearly
demonstrated that the universe is a membrane that obeys the exact condition to be a black hole. So it

20
really is not debatable. It gives the correct mass. But not only that. It gives the correct temperature for
the black hole. That is, the equation gives us the correct radiation for that black hole, which would give
the temperature. And the temperature it gives is the temperature we measure in the background
temperature of our universe.

And so it definitely demonstrates that we live inside a black hole and that everything inside that black
hole are smaller black holes that organize in certain ways to make clusters, superclusters, galaxies,
eventually stars and planets and biology and all this stuff. And the dynamics of this black hole structure
across scale divides in very specific harmonic relationship.

Think of the universe being one wavelength, very long wavelength, and then shorter wavelengths and
shorter wavelengths and shorter wavelengths all the way down to the Planck, and then eventually, as
we discovered with this equation, sub-Planck.

And the sub-Planck wavelength that we discovered is the same distance from the Planck as the Planck
is from the wavelength of the universe. So the Planck radius, to Planck size, the Planck little ball, is in
between the size of the universe and the sub-Planck. So these are huge scales. They're immense.

For example, if we take a little Planck, one bit of information at the Planck scale, and we grow it in
scale to the size of a grain of sand, then the nucleus of an atom, the proton, which is extremely small
already, would have a diameter the approximate equivalent between the sun and Alpha Centauri. That
diameter is about 40 trillion kilometers or 4.2 light years from Earth, a distance that would take about
6,300 years to travel using current technology.

So this is the change in scale between the Planck field and the atom. So you can imagine that it was
easy for standard physics, for the physics community to have missed it, right?

It's so teeny. It's so far removed from the scale at which we experience reality that it's nothing that we
knew was there until recently. Now we're starting to discover, oh, wow, these little Planck oscillators
really have an impact on black hole physics. We're discovering, yes, the temperature and the entropy
of a black hole is related to what these little Plancks are doing. In my equation, we're discovering that
actually, all of the mass, the forces, everything we see in the universe is actually the result of what
these little Planck are doing.

But then you can ask, well, what are these little Planck made of?

Well, they're probably made of smaller Plancks. And this is what we calculated with the equation
because the equation gives us the scales. So we could calculate down as well. And we found that the
next scale of the sub-Planck would be the same distance from the sub-Planck to the Planck as of from
the Planck to the size of the universe, which would lead you to say, well, maybe our universe is like a
Planck for a larger universe, and that universe is like a Planck for an even larger one. And now you're
starting to get the sense that the equation is telling us about things that are much further, much
outside what we can directly observe.

But since it is accurate for everything we observe, we know that it's most likely accurate for these
things that we cannot observe as well. And that would mean that we live in a larger universe, and that
universe is in a larger universe. And thus, we should be talking about multiverse. And the multiverses
are not parallel to each other, but they're embedded within each other like Russian dolls. Now, at any
scale that you look at, you'll find a parallel relationship. You look at galaxies. You'll see a galaxy here
and a galaxy there because they're approximately all the same scales, right? But then you see nothing,
and then eventually, you see stars, right? And then stars are approximately all the same scales. They're
all in a band of scales. And in that scale, I could say things are parallel. So it would be the same as I

21
would say, well, here's our universe. And in that scale of universes, there's other universes that are
parallel.

Think of bubbles of universes that are parallel. But that scale would be embedded in a larger scale
that's a larger universe, like Russian doll universe. So this gives us a much different view of the structure
of our world, the structure of our universe, and the holographic and as well fractal nature of creation.

What's important to remember here is that creation appears to be the result of a flow of information
in which each point contains the whole. As the Planck fields spiral into creation, the information,
because there Is smaller and smaller and smaller bits of information in each point, is conserved.

And all of knowledge about the whole can be extrapolated from the part. For instance, in these
equations, we discover we literally were studying the proton. We were studying the proton using this
equation, and we ended up extrapolating the mass of the universe, its temperature, its acceleration,
and so on. So from the point of a proton, we learned about the whole universe.

And so imagine what that means to you.

That means that from any proton in your body, if you were able to connect and have access, you could
know about everything else in the universe. You can know about the place you've never been, remote
view that place. You could influence something that is far away from you. There's all kinds of
implication to these equations that actually meet some of the most esoteric concept and some of the
esoteric experience people have been having in the world where they think of somebody, and they
call, or they go to a place, and then they say, oh, I dreamed about that place. I know that place. I've
been there. Although they've never been there physically.

If all the information is present in every point, that means that you can have access to information
that's non-local to you. And that means as well that you can learn from within you. That is, not all
knowledge comes from outside of you into you, but that actually, you have knowledge within you that
can emerge from you. And that is the creative process. And that leads as well to understanding the
source of awareness or consciousness.

22
 Chapter 5
- Entanglement in the Holographic Universe -

Is the universe connected at all scales?

And if so, how do we experience it?

In this chapter, we discover that whatever we do influences the whole.

In the earlier chapters, we have discussed that space time is not empty, that it's full of these fluctuation
of Planck oscillators. And these Planck oscillators can be thought that as little bits of information, that
this Planck field - this granular Planck field that's occurring at the very fine structure of spacetime spins
itself into protons, atoms, planets, stars, galaxies, clusters, super clusters, universes, each one being
centered by singularity, by a little teeny black hole, and that is producing scales across our universe
from universal size to subatomic part and that the holographic nature of the interference pattern of
these little Plancks creating all these wave form produce a holographic solution in which every point
contains the whole.

There are discoveries that are occurring now in physics in which we are starting to understand
something that's been very puzzling for many years in quantum theory. Einstein called it spooky action
at a distance. Einstein's spooky action at a distance theory refers to quantum entanglement, which
states that the measurement of one particle will instantly influence another particle regardless of how
far apart they are. So when you modify one particle, the other one modifies itself almost
instantaneously across vast distances. This was a consequence of the exploration of quantum theory
early on, and Einstein thought it was crazy and spooky. And then eventually, it was confirmed in
laboratory.

In laboratory, we discovered that this is true. You can shoot a laser at a carbon particle, for instance,
and it will emit photons. And if the photons are emitted away from each other, they will travel through
a very specific vector, and at a certain distance, you can put a polarizer on one side and then a detector
behind the polarizer on both sides. And so that the polarizer will change the angle of the one for time
on one side and then the detector will pick up the new orientation of that photon. And we discovered
that it doesn't matter how far the distance the proton - the photons travel before they get modified -
before the one get modify. The other one will be modified instantaneously as well. Because we've put
the polarizer close enough to the detector that even at the speed of light, the information could not
be transferred to the other one. Yet the other one arrives at the detector with exactly the same
polarization.

This is called entanglement in physics.

Particles can be entangled. They have to be in a certain state to be entangled. And so we think that
there is particles in the universe that are entangled and particles in the universe that are not.

Is that true? How do we know that's true?

23
In fact, we don't. In fact, we could think that we could have a universe in which all particles are
entangled because they all came out of the same point just like the two photons came out of the same
carbon particle. And so that all particles that came out of the early universe are entangled. And we
don't know because when we wiggle the little particle on the end of my finger here, we don't know--
maybe there's another particle somewhere else in the universe that's feeling that tickle. And it's
laughing, but we don't know because we don't have that side in our laboratory to realize that when I
tickle this one, it's entangled with this one. The whole thing could be entangled. This appeared to me
early on in my exploration of physics. And it became clear that maybe some of the entanglement that's
occurring at the quantum level is the same dynamics that is going on in black hole.

Entanglement at the quantum level may be the result of wormholes that are developed in the structure
of space, connecting particles together. However, wormholes are a consequence of Einstein field
equations, not of quantum theory. These would be quantum size wormholes that are at the Planck
scale of the structure of space time.

This new understanding was developed by Leonard Susskind and is described as ER equals EPR.

E stands for Einstein.

R and P are initials for collaborators Boris Podolsky and Nathan Rosen.

So ER equals EPR suggests that the key to their connection can be found in the spacetime tunnels
known as wormholes like subspace shortcuts physically linking distant locations. So ER equals EPR is a
way of saying wormholes is what produce entanglement at the quantum level. This new view is
emerging as well from our equations now where basically we're showing that we have embeddedness
of wormholes and black holes from universal size to subatomic size.

So think of the black holes as being the boundary that's created by all the Plancks spinning into one
region, and the wormholes, the vortices that would be produced by the spin as it goes - as it extends
from the black hole structure.

ER equals EPR is basically thinking of it a little bit differently but is as well very useful. And it returns,
and it has to do with this holographic solution in the standard model that says that the entropy or the
temperature of the black hole is the result of all the little Planck information on the surface of the black
hole. When this hawking radiation happened when the black hole absorbed one little Planck particle
fluctuation of the vacuum and emits one, these particles despair of Planck particles are entangled just
like the two photons that emerge from the carbon particle in our experiment. And so imagine this.

One is falling into the black hole, and the other one is entangled with it but going away from the black
hole. And then imagine that particle gets caught in the gravitational field of another black hole. And
now it spirals in and falls into the other black hole. Now these two black holes are connected through
this wormhole that connected the entanglement of these two particles, a little teeny Planck sized
wormhole except there could be many, many of the particles that fell into the black hole and many,
many that fell in other black holes and so on and then go back in time. And think of all this stuff coming
out of one black hole, one point. And then you will see, you will visualize, you will understand that all
of these wormholes would be like a spider web of information network emanating and connecting all
of the black holes, all of the singularity, all of the particles in our universe. So we live in a web of
information exchange, and this is really - what our equations are showing is that when the information
is exchanged between the interior of the singularity, the interior of the black hole, no matter at what
scale, its exchange with the hole as well through the wormhole network. And when the exchange
happens between one particle and the whole, the energy that it produce is what we call mass. And

24
that is what we call our reality. This network of information has been imaged and is being discovered
now. Recently, we have seen that when we look at very large structures in the universe, they appear
to be connected through these filaments that connects very large like super clusters and cluster
structures in our universe. And when we look at that from far as a whole, it looks very similar to a
neuron network in your brain. This is all very interesting evidence of scaling of this network across very
large and very small. Imagine the network structure of all the wormholes occurring at the Planck scale
and then these network, making larger network at the proton scale and then these making larger
network at the solar system scale and at the galactic scale and so on so that everything is connected
to this invisible Planck structure network of information, moving bits of information across the universe
so that when one bit falls into a black hole here, it can come out somewhere else in the universe. If
this is true, then the concept of evaporation of black holes disappear. We are now no longer losing
energy. The energy is always recovered in the universe as it exchange information across all nodes.
Imagine the internet as an analogy for the structure of our universe where the hubs of the internet
and the servers of the network are the black holes and all the different scales, and the connection of
the networks are the wormholes connecting all the hubs. Think of it as a neural network of the
universe. Everything we observe in the universe in terms of the energy of a system, in terms of the
relationship of systems with each other like the forces and all this is actually the result of the
information moving through the network. If I isolate one particle because it doesn't have much surface,
not as much information can move through the system. The mass of that particle will be smaller than
the black hole in the universe like the center of a galaxy in which a lot of information can be exchanged
across that hub. Smaller hub, smaller server, less energy, larger server, larger hub, more energy, and
as we know, energy is equivalent to mass. So all of a sudden, we start to see this network structure
emerging that is from the universe all the way to subatomic particle in which we are embedded in
somewhere in the middle. And our existence is actually part of this flow. So this network connects all
these scales. That means that a bit of information that falls into one part of the network can come out
somewhere else in the network and then fall in again and come out somewhere else. And so that
means that information would have some large feedback relationship, and we are starting to discove
that. We are starting to discover that light in our universe curves back on itself and comes back on
itself. We - and this is very, very recent, so it's very exciting because I predicted that that should be the
case, especially if we're living inside a black hole that is our universe. So this information network
feedback feed forward structure is the entropy of our network. That is - and this happened just
recently. I got very excited about it. We were writing equations in my laboratory. We ran out of space
on our board, so we started writing on the windows. And we were writing all of these equations on
the windows, and it became clear that we could express the holographic mass solution which I had
expressed in a very geometric way from the theory of entropy or statistical entropy or straight from
first principle of thermodynamics. And what I mean by that is that we can actually back up the
equations that are more geometric equations, the holographic math solution I proposed initially, into
equations that describe the temperature of systems and their entropy, their energy level. Think of it
as each server on the network is riding the information onto our hard drive and the energy that it takes
for it to do that and the temperature that's created by the server that usually has fans to take the
temperature out. It means that this whole structure can be expressed fundamentally from first
principle from thermodynamics and entropy, that energy thermodynamics entropy, mass, gravity,
electromagnetism, and all these things can be actually described from this one understanding, this one
set of information network that connects everything in the universe so that nothing is independently
doing its thing. It just appears that way because we observe something and we think it's independent
from the rest of the universe, and we say it has this mass. It has this energy. It has this entropy. It has
this temperature, not knowing that this mass, this entropy, this temperature, and all this stuff is the
result of this thing interacting with the rest of their universe. That is beautiful. This is what the

25
equations are showing, and it is extremely precise. It's showing this in a very, very strong way, telling
us at the very fundamental level of creation that everything is connected through this incredible
network of information that is circulating through our universe. That has deep implications because it
means that anything you do it means that anything that changes anywhere is influencing everything
else in the universe, that every action produces a reaction everywhere in the universe. And although-
- however, it's important to understand that they're a scale relationship. So there is hierarchy in the
influence of DNA formation in the universe. There is influences that are larger, for instance, our sun
has a huge influence on the solar system and all the planets in it. But our planets only makes less than
1% the mass of our sun, so they have much less influence on our sun than our sun has influence on the
planets. If the sun blows a sun flare in the direction of the Earth and blows the atmosphere of the Earth
away, the Earth doesn't really have a recourse. It cannot blow back at the sun and blow the atmosphere
of the sun away. There is a relationship of temperatures, energy, mass, entropy across the different
scales. However, every single scale is influencing every single other scale as well, maybe in a minimum
way or in the maximum way, but the whole is connected. And so everything that happens in the
universe is in some ways recorded by the structure of the network of spacetime. And that is profound.
It tells us that from any point in the network, we can have access to the whole. And it tells us that
everything we measure in our world is actually a function of that thing interacting with everything else.
There is huge implication in terms of technology and understanding of energy and temperature,
thermodynamics, and so on, but there's implication as well in understanding the possibility of systems
self-organizing, systems becoming aware, awareness, consciousness, all this can most likely be
extrapolated from this new view. And we will discuss this in further episodes. What's important to
extract from this episode is that the universe is connected at the deepest level through wormholes
black hole interaction and that it's connected at all scale, not just linear connection at one scale but at
all scales and that we're part of this connected universe and that whatever happens in the universe,
whatever we do influence the whole. And that changes our sense of ourselves, of our universe, and
our relationship to it, and it changes ourselves-- our sense of responsibility in the universe. As well, it
connects with some of the most advanced knowledge that has come through the ages from masters
and ancient civilization that talked about our universe being completely connected and talked about
each point influencing the whole.

26
 Chapter 6
- Four Fundamental Forces -

Gravity - why is it important?

In this chapter, we explore the strength and significance of gravity in our universe.

Gravity is an interesting force. It was first thought of by Newton as a force that attracted things to each
other. It was unclear where the force came from. But it was described by Newton as an effect related
to the ether. Eventually, Einstein rewrote the concept of gravity as the result of curvature of spacetime
- that is that space and time can curve to produce an attraction. But that this attraction is not
component of the object itself, but of the space around it-- the curvature of space around it. Typically,
the concept is given as the surface of a trampoline or a flexible surface that would bend as you put a
heavy ball in the middle, and then another ball would appear to be attracted. I'd rather use the analogy
of a tub from which you pulled the plug and have this vortex. And if you put the rubber ducky around
this vortex, it would appear to be attracted. The gravitational force has been a big problem in physics
because it is not necessarily well adapted to quantum theory. How does gravity interact at the
quantum scale?

It is unclear in the standard model. And the other forces, as well, have not been defined very
appropriately. Meaning that we know there's gravity, we know there is electromagnetic fields, we
know there is the strong force, we know there is the weak force - the four forces. But we don't know
where they come from. We don't know how they got there. We don't know what is the source energy
to produce these forces. So from the exploration I did, it became clear that gravity was actually the
result of the structure of space spinning - not just curving, but spinning. So that the curvature is
secondary effect of the spinning of spacetime. What is important here is that as I wrote the equation
for this spinning structure of the vacuum curving creating gravity, it became clear that gravity is actually
a secondary effect of this structure of spacetime spinning. And that when the spin gets to a narrow
neck, the gravity can become very, very strong. Yet, in our current understanding of physics, we think
of gravity as the weakest force. And this has created a lot of issues in our capacity to unify gravity with
the other forces. I think that gravity is actually the strongest force. And I'm going to tell you why. If a
mass is large enough, the gravitational field can be so strong that even electromagnetic fields cannot
escape it. It's called a black hole.

So how can it be the weakest force?

If you say this to a physicist he will say, well, it's only because the mass density or the energy density
in that region of space is very high. Because we make a distinction, we isolate these things. We say
mass is this, and gravity is this. But we've never been able to measure mass without gravity as if mass
went and created the gravitational effect, or that gravity without mass. And this is what we discovered
in this equation, is that it's all the same thing. It's all spacetime spinning - including mass, energy,
thermodynamics, and so on. And so there is no distinction. So all of a sudden you realize, well, when
the vortex of spacetime - when the vortex of the vacuum fluctuation gets tight enough, then gravity is
extremely strong. So then I calculated, if that was true, how strong gravity would become when it

27
arrives at the radius of a proton, and what would be the energy level of that proton. And I found that
the proton would have an energy level equivalent to a black hole, and that the gravitational force of a
black hole the size of the proton would be exactly the strong force. The strong nuclear force is one of
the four fundamental forces in nature. As its name implies, the strong force is the strongest force of
the four. It's responsible for binding together the fundamental particles of matter to form larger
particles. The other three are gravity, electromagnetism, and the weak force. When we discovered
that force, we didn't think it was gravity. We called it the strong force because we thought that gravity
is too weak to do the job. In fact, gravity is the strongest force. And it is that force that's holding the
protons together. Because yes, we measured a mass of the proton as smaller than the mass of a black
hole. However, the energy density of the proton in terms of vacuum fluctuation shows clearly that the
proton has the energy of a black hole, since its gravitational effect is exactly the one that would be
produced by a black hole that size - not approximately, but exactly.

So when you calculate it, what you get is exactly the gravitational coupling constant, which is the
coupling between gravity and the strong force. We see that the strong force is exactly the strength of
gravity for a black hole proton. And the energy that makes the proton a black hole is the energy of the
vacuum structure spinning inside it. What we measured when we measured the mass of the proton is
much smaller because we measure only the energy that's able to emanate from the surface of the
proton. And my holographic mass solution demonstrates that very clearly. All we measure is the
entropy of the proton, not its fundamental energy state. So then the strong force is gravity at the
quantum level. If that's true, then there's another problem that emerge.

Why is the strong force such a short range relative to gravity?

That is, when we scatter protons away from each other, they unstick faster than they would unstick if
gravity was involved. That is, gravity has a range that's the square of the distance, where the strong
force range drops at an exponential rate as you move the protons apart from each other. So
confinement is much stronger and drops much faster. I had to solve this. And I realized that the solution
had to do with mass dilation. Mass dilation occurs when an object is accelerated near the speed of
light. Just like time changes as you approach the speed of light, Einstein discovered in special relativity
that there is a dilation of the mass as well as you approach the speed of light, so that the mass
increases. So the impact of the proton spinning at near the speed of light on the structure of space is
the strength of the strong force in terms of gravity. But when you scatter the proton, when you hit it
with another proton or with an electron and it scatters, it changes its velocity. So the mass dilation
drops as you move. The speed of rotation drops as you move the proton away from each other. As the
speed of rotation drops, the mass drops. As the mass drops, the gravitational force drops. So I
calculated how fast that would all drop as you move the protons away from each other. And I got the
exact same range as the strong force, but using gravity in consideration of special relativity as well,
which implies mass dilation. So it gave me the correct range and the correct strength. This changes the
picture. Because all of a sudden, you eliminate the strong force, and you end up with gravity,
electromagnetism, and a weak force. But think of what we've learned so far throughout this series. We
know spacetime is spinning. We know that when it spins, we know that it produces what we call mass
across all scales. We know that it's the result of all these little particles spinning together-- the Plancks,
the little particles, the pieces of information spinning together that makes up the mass. Well, think of
those little spinning pieces of information the little Plancks spinning – billions of them spinning
together to make a little proton. Think of it like the smoothie that you make in the morning where you
put all these good stuff like the fruits and vegetables in your blender, and then you turn it on. And you
can see the little particles of all the good stuff you put in there going around into this vortex dynamic
with the little particle going from the inside to the outside and back through the middle of the blender

28
in this continuous circulation. All of the sudden, we start to realize, wait, gravity - this curvature in
spacetime - may be the particles falling in - like the Planck field, the flow of this fluid structure of
spacetime falling into the middle of the system. And because of centrifugal forces of the spin, the little
particles get eventually gets ejected as well, and out the middle comes the particle. And that could be
the electromagnetic fields that are radiating from this system. And sure enough, when we write the
equations, that's exactly what we find. We find the thermodynamic radiating field of the
electromagnetic fields emanating from the structure of spacetime spinning. And we've solved this
more fundamentally even because we were able to actually use Brownian motion, which is the position
and relationship of particles in a gas that produce thermodynamic effects and apply it to the Planck
field like if the Planck field was a superfluid gas.

When we ran this equation, we got the holographic mass solution. So it actually all worked out. And
so we found the viscosity of the fluid of spacetime, and the Brownian motion of the fluid of spacetime,
and the thermodynamics of it. And so now we've reduced it to two forces, where we have the radiative
side being the centrifugal force - whether it's at the quantum level. At the quantum level, it's the weak
force. And at the cosmological level, it's the electromagnetic field that we experience, and then the
Planck particles falling back in, which is the gravitational force that holds it all together. All this is the
result of the Planck's field spinning again. In other words, unification of the forces comes directly from
the Planck vacuum oscillations becoming coherent because of spin and producing the dynamical effect
that in certain cases looks like gravity, and in other cases looks like electromagnetic radiation, or at
certain scales looks like the strong force or the weak interaction. And all this emerged from one set of
understanding, one set of fundamental principle, first principles that have to do with the statistical
entropy of the Planck field - the dynamics of the Planck field - the holographic mass solution. It's very
exciting because the field of physics has been divided. And the forces have been put in as we measured
them and as we discovered them, but nothing had been explained - the mechanics under which these
forces have been created and have emerged. So now we end up with the complete unified view of
these forces. And when they make and they interact in very specific relationship with each other, and
so they define very specific boundaries where these interaction between the forces are in the proper
relationship. And when they make these boundaries, we can find eventually the quantization of
spacetime that makes up all of the scales we see in our universe. As we get this understanding of the
unification of the four forces, we realize that, clearly, if we know the mechanism that produced them
- which is the spin of the Planck field - we could go in the laboratory and apply this knowledge to get
remarkable technology definitely. And we'll talk about that. And as we developed our understanding
of these forces, that means that we may be able to affect these forces in our body and our
consciousness because our consciousness is a flow of information. And if this is the fundamental flow
of information of the universe - if these forces are the result of this flow of information in the universe
- it means that we should be able to affect it. So we could learn to increase the energy level, for
instance, of our body, or interact with the structure of space in a way that is nourishing our body
instead of separating our body from the structure of space, which would isolate it and make it ill. Illness
may actually be the result of a decoherency of the information in a region of space in your body. If this
is true, then you could, with your consciousness, recreate a coherency in the body that was previously
altered or broken. And this might be actually why there is a placebo effect. People talk about placebo
effect as if it's just part of a statistical analysis of a data set coming from a group of experiments. It's a
non-trivial thing that you can give medicine to one person, and they get better. And you can give a
sugar pill to the other person, telling them it's medicine that's going to make them better, and they
get better as well. For 30 to some 50 in some cases, percentile of a data set, the placebo effect is
significant.

How is that happening?

29
It's like a miracle. You tell someone that if they take this pill, they're not going to have this illness
anymore. And even though the pill has nothing to do with the illness, they get better. There is, even at
this point, tests that were made with the placebo effect where there was placebo surgery that was
done, where the surgeons, in some cases, open the person and did the surgery and the person got
better. And in other cases, they opened the person, didn't do anything in their, close the person, and
send them home. And because the person thought they had the operation and that the problem was
fixed, well, then the problem was fixed. Some 30% of the people showed placebo surgery capabilities.
And so this might be the result of our consciousness, or our intention, or beliefs affecting the
information in the structure of space, and acting upon the forces of space and time so that the region
of the body in which there was decoherency of the information could get back into coherency even in
mechanical ways in which the illness implies that a mechanical surgery would have to be made where
the molecules rearrange themselves to repair the damage. So it's remarkable. And it implies that not
only does this new understanding of information in the structure of space - in the granular structure
of space - is something that can unify physics, but it can unify our understanding of consciousness and
information relative to our existence. Meaning that our existence is really just an extension of these
fundamental physics that produced the forces, that produced mass, that produced entropy, that
produced temperature, and so on, and that the end result is one of us. And the dynamics of spacetime
is actually very much part of our experience of awareness and consciousness. What's important to
retain here is that forces are not separate from each other. That forces in the universe are a flow in
certain circumstances creating this effect, and other circumstance creating this effect. But that they're
not separate. That spacetime, that flow is into a vortex produces what we call mass at the same time
as it produced what we call gravity. And that electromagnetic fields is a result of these dynamics
occurring in which there is a force that's pulling away from the system producing radiation, and
magnetism, and electromagnetic fields. So that we understand that this is one thing. And that this one
thing is able to produce effects that appear separate from each other,but they're not. And that we are
part of this unity of this one thing. And that the ultimate emergence of our existence may be the result
of these dynamics at different scales eventually producing the advanced dynamics that we see in a
complex human being with its capacity to self-reflect or to have self-awareness. What's exciting about
understanding the source of gravity at a deeper level is that you realize that it is part of something
much more advanced and much more unified. It's not some weird, odd thing that's happening in the
universe that we don't quite understand. But that gravity is a secondary effect of the dynamic of space
itself. It's all one thing. You could think of gravity - if you were to associate an emotion to it, you can
think of gravity as love - what attracts, what holds to the centripetal force of the spin of spacetime,
holding like the mother holding the hand of the child. And that gives you an emotional relationship to
gravity. And I think that's not only a beautiful metaphor, but as well that it gives you a sense of
belonging - a sense of belonging to something greater than you, a sense of belonging to mechanics of
spacetime that you're embedded in and that you're participating in at the deepest level of your
existence. And you start to sense that you're not separate from the universe, that you're part of this
oneness of the universe. And that makes you - in my case, it makes me feel warm and cozy inside. We
often think of gravity as something heavy that pulls us to the center and keeps us stuck to the surface
of a planet, for instance.

However, really, you could think of gravity as the result of a certain set of information flow. And you
could think that this information flow can be directed in any direction. That is, instead of the
information flow flowing towards the center of our planet and producing this force that holds us to
the surface -a little bit like Newton had described it - you could think of this information flow being
able to be directed since it's coupled to the electromagnetic field in a different direction. And that
would lead to a different way of thinking of mass and energy. But as well, in technological development

30
that could liberate humanity from the surface of the planet. So that humanity may enter a larger
gravitational field. So you can think of gravitational fields almost as the field of information that holds
a certain set of information to the surface of a planet, or a solar system, or a galaxy. And so going from
one set of gravity to another set of gravity would be like graduating into a larger set of information -
for instance, graduating to the set of information that's the galactic community set of information. And
as you graduate to the galactic set of information, you would develop the technology that can bring
you there.

Chapter 7
- New Model of the Big Bang -

How was our universe born?

Was it because of the Big Bang?

In this chapter, we explore the question of cosmogenesis.

Earlier, we described spacetime as full of energy. And we saw that this energy is at the source of
creation. We saw that the equations we developed showed that the proton is basically a vortex of this
energy of space, the vacuum fluctuation, and that all the particles and all the scales are as well vortices
of this vacuum structure. One of the equations that we wrote that was very insightful was the equation
that gived us the correct answer for the vacuum density at the cosmological level. We briefly discussed
earlier that there is such a thing in physics that is called the vacuum catastrophe. Astrophysicists, when
they observe the universe, they see that the universe is not just expanding but it's accelerating when
it expands. In order to account for that acceleration, they have to consider the quantum vacuum
fluctuation at that scale. They call it dark energy. When they put the vacuum fluctuation, the dark
energy in, they can calculate the density of how much vacuum energy is present to produce the
expansion. And they find the density of 10 to the minus 30 grams per centimeter cubed. So it's almost
122 orders of magnitude difference between the Planck vacuum density and the cosmological vacuum.
We wrote a paper resolving the vacuum catastrophe last year. In that paper, we show that if we take
a proton and we expand it to the size of the universe, we find the correct vacuum density for the
universal size. So to be clear, there is a vacuum fluctuation in the proton. The proton is a little ball of
Planck oscillators, billions of them, 10 to the 60th. So it's a significantly large number. They're spinning
together. And they have the density of what is thought to be the Planck density, or a very high density,
10 to the 93 grams per centimeter cube, which is the Planck density at the quantum scale. This
produced a lot of debate in the physics community for decades. It's thought to be one of the biggest
errors in physics, this discrepancy of 122 orders of magnitude. It created a lot of debate and as well a
certain amount of lack of confidence of the understanding of physics, whether it's at the cosmological
level or at the quantum level. The vacuum catastrophe is one of the largest problem in physics.
Quantum physicists say it has to be very dense. And cosmologists say it has to be very low density. So
this is very powerful.

But what does it mean about our universe?

31
What does it mean about the birth of our universe?

Why are protons in our universe not expanding to the size of the universe right now?

Why did one proton all of a sudden expand to the size of the universe?

And that proton might have started as a Planck expanding to a proton expanding to a universe. The Big
Bang Theory actually starts with a Planck size singularity expanding to the size of the universe
extremely rapidly. It's called inflation where the universe in the first Planck second expands to almost
the size it is today. So it expands at billions, trillions of times faster than the speed of light.

Is that the right picture?

It's not clear that it is correct. There is many discrepancies in the standard model. And one of them
being that the source of energy for the expansion of the universe, the source of energy for that Planck
to all of a sudden explode into all of time and space and all of the matter in the universe, has not been
described. There's no mechanism that explains how the Planck-sized object all of a sudden just
exploded into a universe. And there is no explanation where the energy came from for this to happen.

With the model that we've developed now, which gives the correct answers for the mass and for the
acceleration and so on, we get a different picture. From the equations we wrote and what we discussed
before, we know that the universe is scaling from the Planck scale or even the sub-Planck scale to the
atomic scale and so on - planets, stars, galaxies, clusters, super clusters, and universes, all this giving
the correct answer. When we think of this then, we can think that our universe then is an object very
akin to a black hole. And we can show that in the equations, because when we get the temperature,
we get the temperature which is equivalent to the Hawking radiation of a black hole. So we know our
universe is a black hole. It has a correct mass and radius exactly to be a black hole. If that's true, and
we see that there an exchange between the interior of a black hole and the exterior of the black hole,
which is what we are finding in our equation, that black holes are not isolated, that there is information
falling in and then there's information expanding out of black holes because of their angular
momentum, then we could think that our universe is not singular but that our universe is part of many
other universes in a larger one, because the scaling tells us this. It tells us that our universe is part of
many universes that are - think of bubbles together in a larger universe, an extremely large universe,
which could be a bubble that's together with other bubble of that size in the larger universe just like
galaxies are inside our universe. Well, all this tells us something profound. That is that our universe
might be the result of a proton or a singularity, a Planck singularity, that escaped another universe,
another bubble. To restate what Hawking radiation, is Hawking radiation says that vacuum fluctuations
near the event horizon can produce a pair of particles in which one particle is radiated out of the black
hole and one particle falls into the black hole. So imagine a particle at the surface of the event horizon
of a universal black hole of about our size that radiates a particle out. When that particle arrives in the
larger universe, the vacuum density of the larger universe is many, many orders of magnitude lower
than the Planck density that that particle is made of. The result is that that particle would expand very
rapidly to make a proton, eventually to make a universe. And as it expands, it would as well exchange
information and change particle due to Hawking radiation and change its dynamics inside. You can
imagine the expansion of such a bubble very, very rapidly producing vorticular dynamics, change in
density in the system, and vorticular dynamics that eventually would make quasars, galaxies, clusters,
super clusters, stars, planets, and eventually us. This is a completely different view of creation. You can
imagine the surface of bubble universes radiating these particles and these particles popping into or
expanding into new universes like foaming new universes into existence. This vacuum fluctuation has
even been called quantum foam for a long time. The foaming of creation resemble much more a
biological dynamic. Cosmogenesis then is the result of changes in density when the particle escapes a

32
universe. But don't just think of this being localized to the bubble universes of our size. That would
mean that other universes, very large ones, that are part of the multiverse, so the universe, for
instance, in which we are, which could be a universe that has a density in which our universe is
equivalent to a proton for that universe. You can imagine that universe birthing another universe of its
own size as well. It would mean as well that our universe will eventually stabilize at a certain radius
when equilibrium will be achieved between the inside of our universe and the outside of our universe
so that there is a state of equilibrium at the event horizon of the black hole. So that means that our
universe at one point would reach a point of equilibrium with the larger universe it's in. And what we
would see is a slowing down or stopping of the expansion. Now I want to talk a little bit about
expansion and acceleration in our universe. It may be that the dynamics of expansion of our universe
have been simplified a little too much. They can be more complex dynamics in our universe than what
we previously thought. That is when the universe expanded, the dynamics of the fluid structure of
spacetime in our universe would produce vorticity locally but as well globally, collectively, for all of the
universe. So the universe would have a structure. It wouldn't be completely amorphous. It would have
a structure. It would have polarity. And it would have a double tourist type of structure a little bit like
galaxy. Think of a galaxy the size of our universe with its jet and with its disk. We've started to see
some of those structures in the universe. We've we found places where it's much denser and super
clusters. It's like a wall. We found places where we call it the dark flow where there's very little. You
know, that would be - think of the arms of the galaxy at the universal level. There would be region with
more material, region with less material. And there would be a definite flow like in galaxies where star
goes from the center out to the edge into the halo of the galaxy up at the poles and then come back
down in this toroidal dynamic with the jets in the middle. And there would be polarity to our universe
in such a way that we might find that there's matter that's spinning in one direction and matter that's
spinning in the other direction. And that is what we found. We found that matter can spin in the
opposite direction of the ordinary matter that we see. And we call that antimatter. And this was a
consequence of the Dirac equations discovering the electron antimatter particle or the positron. So
this dynamic would, in the universe, would move things in certain ways in which an observer, a teeny
weeny little observer like us might think that the universe radius is expanding, which could be the case,
which most likely is the case. But this could be combined with the movement of the material inside the
universe, which would appear to us as material accelerating away. And so there is a more complex
view of the motion of stars relative to each other but as well of galaxies relative to each other and
structures relative to each other. We're finding, for instance, that quasars in our universe and certain
region all align very precisely to one very specific direction. Quasars have these massive jets that come
out of it like these huge vortices which are evidence of this fluid dynamics spinning structure of
spacetime. But these huge jets can be a million light years long. And they all seem to align in this very
specific region of our universe. Well, that might be because they're close to the polar vortices of our
universe itself. And so they tend to, if they're not aligned, they would tend to slowly align to that pole
as they approach the polarity of our universe. So there's things like that are puzzling the current physics
community that start to be understood better with this new model of physics. Just recently - this has
been an ongoing investigation since the '90s as I can remember it - we have noticed as well that light
polarization moving through our universe is by birefringent or acts like it's moving through a crystal.
There is lots of evidence of it in many ways. Think of like the structure of spacetime aligning to a
universal frame of reference, a universal polarized field. And this leads to belief that this vacuum
structure is not only organized by spin but that spin as well produce polarization. So this is called
quantum vacuum polarization. And from this polarity our equations tells us that these magnetic and
electromagnetic field emerges. It's a completely different view of our universe. It's a view where the
universe is not some random bubble that's just producing random effects, but it's highly organized. It's
polarized. It's not just one universe. It's part of many, many universe that are being created. And it's

33
inside a larger universe and a larger universe. When you tell a child about the Big Bang Theory, and
you say it all started with a big explosion, typically, the first thing a child will think of or ask will be what
was there before the explosion. Clearly, this new view tells us that the universe is fractal in nature. And
it's fractal in scales. And there's an infinite amount of scales producing an infinite amount of creative
path that we call universe. And this evolution is very specific to the coordinates in spacetime in which
it's happening. So you can think of it as very individualized but part of the oneness of the infinite nature
of the fractal structure of spacetime. Initially, Georges Lemaitre, a Belgium cosmologist and Catholic
priest, argued that the physical universe was originally a single particle, the primeval atom as he called
it, which disintegrated in an explosion giving rise to space and time and the expansion of the universe
that continues to this day. The idea marked the birth of what we now know as big bang cosmology.
Later on, cosmologists realized that an atom was not a good start, that it would more likely be a Planck-
sized object that expanded to eventually produce all the time and space and all the matter we see in
the universe. However, none of these scenarios gives us a clear understanding of why and atom would
all of a sudden, or a Planck-size object all of a sudden would expand to the size of a universe.

What is the energy?

Where did the energy come from for that to have happened?

What is the mechanics that made it happen and so on. Our equation shows something similar but
different. It gets rid of this idea of an explosion, this idea of a bang. It actually shows that it's basically
scalar relationship of radiation of black hole. So imagine our universe as a black hole. And it has
Hawking radiation. So the vacuum fluctuation, the Plank vacuum fluctuation near the event horizon
produced particles. And these particles, one of them can radiate and one of them can fall in. When a
particle radiates into the larger universe, the larger black hole that our black hole universe is in, the
density of that larger black hole is much, much, much smaller, orders and orders of magnitude smaller
density than our universe. So when it escapes the black hole universe that we're in into the larger black
hole, the density change will make it expand very, very rapidly. And this mechanism is what we believe
is actually the source of the expansion of the universe or what we have typically called the Big Bang.
Ancient civilizations had very similar thoughts about the universe. They thought about the universe as
having information that could be contained in every atom in the universe. Many different civilizations
around the world had this in their folklore in their traditions. They thought of the universe as being
just one universe part of many others. They talked about our universe as continuously expanding, or
changing, or evolving. And when they talked about where they got this knowledge, they said they got
it from sun gods from being from the stars, from the gods that instructed them on the structure of the
universe, and how it works, and so on. It's really interesting that at this time in history, we seem to be
finding very similar concepts emerging in advanced physics, the concept of a holographic universe
where every point contains all the information and so on, the concept of scaling universe, fractal
structures in the universe and multiverses. All this seemed to be known by many ancient civilizations
around the world thousands of years prior to modern physics. Were they instructed by advanced being
that they had contact with at the time?

I don't know. But definitely there is an analog between what we are finding today and what ancient
civilization knew from whether it was direct contact with advanced knowledge or from their spiritual
exploration, which may have led them to understand the universe by the study of their own being
since if the universe is a holographic, each point contains the whole, all information should be available
to every being in the universe.

Remember in previos chapter when we talked about the entanglement of particles where two particles
leaving one atom will be entangled and how particles are most likely all entangled because they all

34
came from the same source, which I just described being a proton or a Planck leaving another universe.
So everything is entangled. Well, that means that as well all of these universes are entangled because
they all emerged from one another. So all the scales are entangled. All the universes are entangled.
However, they are developing independently from each other. And the information is moving through
the whole system in a very complex way. So you could think that the entanglement of the universe is
out there that our universe has created would have some of the information about you and I and
everything we see here that I could go to another universe. And if I got the right source, I could learn
about what's going on here and that they may be something very similar to what's going on here that's
happening over there but a little bit different, because it's getting a little bit different set of information
because it's in different coordinates of spacetime. In an infinite fractal universe, it's important to
understand that every point is the center. So you could say I'm the center of the universe. However,
there would be a larger universe that our universe is in, and a larger universe that our universe is in,
and so on.

At one point, I could find a universe that I'm in the center of. And it's important to remember that
every other point is the center of their own universe as well. Otherwise you'd get in trouble. But clearly,
individualization and the oneness of infinite fractal universe occurs because each point observed the
universe from its own perspective and gathers different sets of information, and so is there an exact
copy of me in a parallel universe?

I would say no. But they may be a information set very similar or in resonance with my information set
in another universe due to the entanglement relationship of all the universes together.

Chapter 8
- Complexity in a Conscious Universe -

Is the universe random?

In this chapter, we discuss how the rise of complexity in our universe supports a completely different
view.

Standard science and physics specifically has been very strong in believing that we live in a random
universe, that everything happens just because things are bumping into each other by chance.
Somehow by this incredible fluke, our world came about with all the biology on it, and all the things
we see, including us. Is that possible?

Is it even feasible that the universe would be the result of some random structure that all of a sudden
made up biology?

Our calculation shows absolutely not. The rise of complexity, that is the rise of the organized bio
structure that we see on our planet, for instance, cannot occur out of just random function. The fact
that everything in the universe has to be tuned just right for this to happen, cannot be the result of
just random fluctuations. There's got to be order. The problem is that when you start to talk about

35
there's got to be order, it scares the scientific community terribly. The reason is historic. Science was
developed as a way to get away from religion, a way to get away from the concept that there's some
creator sitting in a big throne that's organizing creation. Science needed to depart from that view. And
one way to do it was to assume that actually there is no such thing, that everything is just random,
everything happens by chance, and we got here just because the chances were good, and we ended
up showing up. This is contrary to simple statistical analysis of our universe. One of the calculations
one can do is the probability of the nucleotides. There is about 100 natural occurring nucleotides that
make up the RNA molecules. And those are required for life to emerge. Nucleotides form the basic
structural components or building blocks of DNA and RNA. They are the repository of the genetic
information responsible for the transmission of inherited characteristics from parents to children, and
from one cell to another.

Ultimately, the morphological and functional uniqueness of each living being are determined by the
information contained in them. So even for a mono-cellular life, like one cell, there's that need that
molecule has to assemble in such a way that about a hundred-trillion atoms would make a cell. Well,
when you calculate the probability of that happening just by random chance, the nucleotide trying to
fit together, and just bumping into each other, and getting the right configuration, and all of a sudden
making a cellular structure; the probability are 1 multiplied by 10 to the 8,896. That number is so huge
that the probabilities can pretty well be thought to be zero. Let's use another example the universe is
really, really big. You could measure the radius of the universe in centimeters. A centimeter is very,
very small compared to the universe.

Think of the solar system is already big, right?

There's billions and billions of stars to almost 200 billion stars in our galaxy. Galaxies are big. Galaxies
are very, very teeny compared to our universe. When you look at the galaxy from our universal size, it
looks like a star. You can't even see that it's composed of stars. So you'd say, if I'm going to measure
the radius of the universe in centimeters, I'm going to need a lot of centimeters. Well, the radius of the
universe in centimeters is approximately 10 to the 28 centimeters. 10 to the 28 is a very, very large
number then. So imagine the probability that nucleotides would just all of a sudden bump into each
other just right, to come out with life are in the probabilities of 10 to the 8,896. Basically, you could
say those probabilities are zero. Right?

It's just not going to happen that way. One approach has been to invoke infinite universes. And say,
well, in an infinite amount of universes, there would be more probabilities that all of a sudden one of
those universes would get the nucleotides right, and would get all the pieces right, and life would
emerge. This is really a cop-out. It scares the scientists to say, oh, there might be an organizing
mechanism. Because they start thinking, oh, that's sounding like religion. Well, there's a whole lot
more simpler explanation than some god organizing creation, or the universe is completely random,
and somehow in an infinite amount of universes, we just happen to luck out and be in the universe
that has exactly the right configuration for everything to just come right, and end up with us. The
alternative is that there is feedback in the information of the universe. As soon as you have feedback,
you have organization. And this is what we see in the natural world. We see species that modifies their
structure, that modifies their behavior, based on the feedback they get from the environment. You
change the environment, the species change. They start adapting. The self-organizing structure and
the rise of complexity in our world may be the result of the feedback structure, of the information
network that's occurring at all the scales, which is what our equations describe. Remember from what
we learned so far throughout these episodes, there is a field of information, the Planck fluctuation at
the basis of everything. The way the information organizes produces little scales and bigger scales
across all of the universe. And the information in each one of those scales can be radiated from the

36
center out, and absorb in again, one being the electromagnetic field and one being the gravitational
field. The information feedback would produce higher and higher level of organization, very, very
rapidly. A good example is a Rubik's cube. Think of a blind person trying to order a Rubik's cube. While
if you calculate the probabilities of that blind person ordering the Rubik's cube by chance, because
they don't know if they're getting closer or further from the solution, and let's assume that they're
making a move every second. So every second they make a move. You can calculate the probability of
them ordering it by chance about 158 or 160 billion years. Our universe we know is approximately
13.7-13.8 billion years. So it exceeds the time of the universe by a long shot. But if you give feedback
to that person, that is every time they move the Rubik's cube, every time they make a move, you say
yes or no; yes, you're getting closer; no, you're getting further. Then about 2 to 2 and 1/2 minutes, the
Rubik's cube will be ordered, just with a simple binary feedback, yes, no. Think about the feedback
that's going on in all of the structures of the universe, with the Planck field being each bit of information
feeding back into this loop, into these toroidal dynamics of spacetime. The system is learning about
itself. The system is absorbing information, injecting information, and exchanging information through
this incredible structure network of spacetime. The network is learning about itself. We see this in
biology.

Think of microbes learning about the environment and modifying themselves so that they can be more
and more efficient in the environment. Think of viruses modifying themselves, like the cold virus every
year is a little different, because it adapts itself to learn about the environment and be more efficient.
So this alternative to understanding the rise of the complex nature of biology in the universe and the
organization of the universe, tells us something very profound about ourselves, but as well something
very profound about consciousness, and awareness in our universe. That is that awareness and
consciousness is not something that's only localized to the brain of a human being. But that the brain
of a human being may be actually part of a feedback of information at the Planck scale, at the quantum
scale. It's feeding information into the quantum scale. The quantum scale is feeding back experiences,
in a continuous feedback feed-forward loop. Think of yourself throughout the day. You emanate
thermodynamically. As you radiate information, as you radiate thermodynamically, you're making very
coordinated actions. You're doing things. You're absorbing information from the stuff around you,
through your eyes, through your nose, through your senses. You're getting information. You're feeding
that back through the Planck field that makes you into all of the Planck memory network of spacetime.
I call it space memory network, because without memory, there is no time. If you can't remember
anything before this moment, you don't know that there's a linear movement of time, that there's a
linear function of time.

No memory, no time.

So it's more accurate to describe space memory then space time. What I mean by that is that when
you're flowing through space, when you are interacting with the Planck field, when you're interacting
with the information of the field, you are leaving an imprint, frame dragging across space. Remember,
the planet is going at very high velocity through space, as it's going around the sun, and the sun's going
in this galaxy, and so on. You're leaving information on the structure of space in coordinates in space
and time is just information on the coordinates of space. So your memory and the memory that makes
it so that biology or atomic structure can organize eventually into biology, the memory of space and
time is what you're actually thinking of as your memory. When you remember something, you're
accessing information in the coordinates of space time where that action took place. You are entangled
with this information set. That is a completely different view of who you are. All of a sudden, your brain
is not manufacturing consciousness or an epi-phenomena of consciousness. But your brain is more like
an antenna, connecting to information sets, and these information set producing reactions in your

37
body that you act upon. This is the feedback structure of the space memory network, as we describe
it. And we wrote papers on this. It changes completely our understanding of ourself and our interaction
with the universe.

So you might ask then, is everything conscious?

Because if the information flow is across all the scales, you can imagine a star that's spinning through
space is affecting the memory network in its region, the Planck field, and making smaller vortices which
spins out that we call stars. And then these stars can make smaller vortices at the event horizon that
spins out into particles we call protons. And electrons, and table of elements, and all this stuff coming
out of stars. And then these organize into smaller vortices created by the star in the Planck field that
we call planets. And then on the surface of those planets, these atoms that were made by the stars
organize. And then they start feeding information into the feedback loop of spacetime, and start
organizing into systems that are getting more and more complex. So it's like the whole universe is
conspiring. And you can't say consciousness starts here, and anything before that is not consciousness.
Because it's all of the information flow throughout that whole chain of events that eventually gets to
the complexity large enough that the system becomes self-aware. Because I mean when you say we're
conscious, we're a bag of fluids, mostly water with minerals in it, that have organized themselves in a
certain way. Well, if this bag of water and minerals is an antenna for information, then this information
flow or what we call consciousness is everywhere. Everything is conscious. But consciousness is the
mechanics of the information through the whole thing. So that the rock over there is really just part of
this mechanics that eventually produced the complexity necessary for a system to become self-aware
which is a remarkable thing. It's a universe learning about itself to the point that it becomes aware of
itself. And it grows into a more and more complex system. Hopefully our civilization will learn about
itself fast enough, so that it will survive some of the larger challenge that it has created for itself by a
misunderstanding of its relationship with the universe. It's like spacetime is the hard drive that's getting
imprinted all of the information of the structure as it moves through it, and all of the complexity. So a
planet moving through the Planck field is leaving a very specific trail that's more simple, that's less
complex. As the planet spiraled through space, and this is important as well, the mechanics are not
where systems come back on themself. But they actually evolve as they move through space. So our
Sun is moving through the galaxy. Our planets are spiraling around it. And we're leaving a trail of
information. And this is how we imprint the structure of spacetime with the information that we think
of as our memory. You could even think of it as the gene set that makes who you are who you are.
Think of all the information of all the ancestry of your mother, and your father, and their grandmother,
and all of the genetic information that eventually makes you, how can that be contained in the simple
molecules of biology?

Well, it's not.

These molecules are imprinted with the information which is in the structure of space. These molecules
are accessing the information of almost an infinite amount of genealogy of all of your ancestors
throughout the structure of space, which makes so that your nose is a little bit like this, and your eyes
is a little bit like that, and your ears. But it's still not your grandfather or your grandmother, it's
something different. It's something that has evolved. Because you're spiraling. Because the universe is
learning. Each generation is learning at a different rate, at a different level, at a different level of
complexity. Think of the complexity of the life of our generation. And then I have children. And when
I look at my children, they learn so much faster than I learned when I was younger, because their
environment is different as well, because we've evolved. So now they have a smartphone in their hands
at the age of 9, where we were still bicycling around, throwing balls in the backyard at that age. They
are getting information from the internet about anything they want to know. So the whole thing is

38
learning about itself. And we're leaving the information in the structure of spacetime as we move
through space for the generation to come. But as well, we're projecting information in our future. That
is we have the capacity to take the information of the past, arrange it in certain ways, to intend certain
things in the future. Well, since the whole memory network structure of spacetime is wormhole
connected, think of the Plancks behind me are influencing the Plancks in front of me. So there's a
certain path that is being laid in front of me. This is what we think of as destiny. The natural flow of
creation, the natural flow of the universe, we think we have free will. Yeah, we may have free will
locally. But we're part of a larger flow, all the other human beings on the planet, all of the animals, the
movement of the planet through space, the sun, the galaxy, all this. We can all overcome this. We can
start to influence the flow more. The way we interpret the information of the past is going to influence
the way the information organize in our future. So with our intent, we can interpret the past in a way
that we get more of the future we want, and less of the future we don't want. When we change as well
our interaction with the past, we're not just changing it for us. This is how we change in the present.
We think of the past in a different way. This is the concept of, for instance, psychology. Right?

You think about past events that influenced you, and maybe the psychiatrist or the psychologist can
give you a new perspective on it. And then you'd think about it differently. And it changes you in the
present. And this is why I believe the phenomenon of epigenetics is starting to be discovered.
Epigenetics involve genetic control by factors other than an individual's DNA sequence. It works
through chemical tags added to chromosomes that in effect switch genes on or off. This affects how
cells read the genes. Epigenetic change is a regular and natural occurrence, but can also be influenced
by several factors, including age, the environment, lifestyle, and plays a critical role in disease. The
genes that you have at birth are not stuck in cement. They evolve. They change. They change, because
you change. And you're changing the past.

Einstein's field equation predicts that you can modify the past, and that you can time travel. This new
view of spacetime starts to give you a little bit more of the mechanics and the understanding of not
just how that's possible, but how the existence of the human beings is actually doing that all the time.
Time is information in coordinates in space, in which each coordinate is a Planck time. It's very, very
short time. So it's like frames. And the frames are rolling, just like a movie frame, rolling at the speed
of light. So it appears smooth. But even the movement of your hand in space is not smooth, meaning
that it's not clear how to measure the movement of your hand in space, because you can measure it
in standard physics. You would say, OK, it left point A at this time. It arrived at point B at this time. It
traveled this distance. I can calculate the velocity of the hand through space. It was going at 3 miles an
hour. What is forgotten when you do this measurement is that you've isolated the system. You've
made it an isolated system. You've isolated your hand from all the other movements in the universe.
If you're honest about what's going on with your hand, while you're moving from point A to point B,
you have to add the speed of the Earth, because as you move, the Earth was spinning. And then you
have to add the rotation of the Earth around the Sun, as you move your hand, and the Sun in the
galaxy, and so on. And so now your hand is going at very, very close to the speed of light very quickly.

So what is movement becomes complex, right?

Well you could think of movement in a completely different way. You could think of movement as you
recorded your hand in the Planck field at this coordinates in space, and then the next Planck second,
so your hand became the whole Planck field. And then it became your hand again at the next Planck
second, but in a coordinate that's a little bit beside it. And so your hand then is undoing and redoing,
and undoing and redoing, and undoing. And everything in the universe is fluctuating like that as it's
creating and as it's moving to space. The thing to remember from this is that you are not separate from
the dynamics that produces supernovas, and stars, and galaxies, and universes, and the structure of

39
spacetime at the Planck scale. You're part of this flow of information. And what you call your body and
the complexity of the biology all around you, the fractal nature of the trees, and the plants, and
everything; is all an emergence of this information flow, including what you think of as your
consciousness.

40