Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 11 views

    Display - PDF - 2022-10-27T072010.613

    Uploaded by

    AAKASH BHATIA
    This document summarizes a court case between Shyam Taneja and Sushil. At the hearing, the complainant's counsel and the accused's advocate were present. However, the complainant witness was absent so an adjournment was sought and granted. The case was adjourned to October 13, 2021 for the complainant's evidence to be heard.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Display - PDF - 2022-10-27T072010.613

    Uploaded by

    AAKASH BHATIA
    11 views1 page
    This document summarizes a court case between Shyam Taneja and Sushil. At the hearing, the complainant's counsel and the accused's advocate were present. However, the complainant witness was absent so an adjournment was sought and granted. The case was adjourned to October 13, 2021 for the complainant's evidence to be heard.

    Original Description:

    Original Title

    display_pdf - 2022-10-27T072010.613

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document summarizes a court case between Shyam Taneja and Sushil. At the hearing, the complainant's counsel and the accused's advocate were present. However, the complainant witness was absent so an adjournment was sought and granted. The case was adjourned to October 13, 2021 for the complainant's evidence to be heard.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf or txt
    11 views1 page

    Display - PDF - 2022-10-27T072010.613

    Uploaded by

    AAKASH BHATIA
    This document summarizes a court case between Shyam Taneja and Sushil. At the hearing, the complainant's counsel and the accused's advocate were present. However, the complainant witness was absent so an adjournment was sought and granted. The case was adjourned to October 13, 2021 for the complainant's evidence to be heard.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 1

    Shyam Taneja vs.

    Sushil coma 1438

    Present: Sh. Ishant Khangwal, counsel for complainant.


    Accused on bail with Sh. Vinod Bhankar, Advocate.

    No CW is present today. Adjournment sought. Heard. Allowed.

    Case is adjourned to 13.10.2021 for evidence of complainant.

    (Ravi)
    JMIC, Rohtak
    UID No. HR0409
    09.08.2021
    Monika

    " I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this


    document."
    Digitally signed by MONIKA VIRMANI
    DN: cn=MONIKA VIRMANI, ou=STENOGRAPHER,
    o=District & Sessions Court Rohtak, st=Haryana, c=IN
    Date: 2021.08.09 14:57:56 +0530

    You might also like