The document gives a rating of 3 out of 5 for the Philippine government's disaster preparedness plan and response. While the government has generally addressed hazards, the response has not always been timely or precise. Surveys found that only 62-68% of people received sufficient or reliable information from local governments. The document notes several major recent disasters in the Philippines and suggests response could be improved by acting faster and increasing disaster management budgets. It also expresses concern about reopening tourism while COVID-19 cases are still active. Overall, the assessment is that the government does reasonably well given budget constraints but could enhance response timeliness and funding.
The document gives a rating of 3 out of 5 for the Philippine government's disaster preparedness plan and response. While the government has generally addressed hazards, the response has not always been timely or precise. Surveys found that only 62-68% of people received sufficient or reliable information from local governments. The document notes several major recent disasters in the Philippines and suggests response could be improved by acting faster and increasing disaster management budgets. It also expresses concern about reopening tourism while COVID-19 cases are still active. Overall, the assessment is that the government does reasonably well given budget constraints but could enhance response timeliness and funding.
The document gives a rating of 3 out of 5 for the Philippine government's disaster preparedness plan and response. While the government has generally addressed hazards, the response has not always been timely or precise. Surveys found that only 62-68% of people received sufficient or reliable information from local governments. The document notes several major recent disasters in the Philippines and suggests response could be improved by acting faster and increasing disaster management budgets. It also expresses concern about reopening tourism while COVID-19 cases are still active. Overall, the assessment is that the government does reasonably well given budget constraints but could enhance response timeliness and funding.
My evaluation/assessment to the Philippine Government’s Disaster Preparedness plan
and response is 3 or satisfactory. I mean almost all of the hazards that came to our country has been solved or addressed by the government but the quality of service and accuracy of the response and help is not that accurate enough to rate it outstanding. These past years, many tremendous disasters have occurred in our country including the Taal volcano eruption, typhoon Yolanda, Bohol earthquake, Marawi siege and etc. During the typhoon Yolanda many casualties has been recorded and I think that’s because of the lack of preparedness and warning by the government before the disaster happened. Based from Harvard Humanitarian Initiative, at the national level, 82 percent of the population received their main source of news from television followed by 9 percent from radio. When asked specifically about information from their LGU, respondents agreed that information from the LGU arrived in a timely manner (62 percent), was sufficient to prepare for a disaster (65 percent), and was reliable (68 percent). That was a low percentage as well as the response and help is also imprecise and delayed but anyway there’s a help given by our government to those victims. In support and assistance, a substantial part of the national population (63 percent) have received assistance following a disaster. The vast amount was provided by their local government units (LGU) (52 percent). When asked about who they would receive help from if a disaster were to happen, respondents did not feel as though they would receive much help and assistance from neighbors, friends, or non-government organizations (NGOs). Most Filipinos believed that they are self-reliant in preparing for a disaster (64 percent), during a disaster (62 percent), and in the aftermath of a disaster (63 percent), based from Harvard Humanitarian Initiative. Volcanic eruptions and earthquakes were common also in Philippines, so I guess that’s why the government somehow know what to do when it happens; not just sure about the” Big One”. While the rest of the disasters that occurred in our country was in able to managed by our government and it’s pretty impressive even we have lesser budget compare to other countries. And now that another disaster has come which is the pandemic COVID-19, the government is doing its best to protect and avoid the spread of the disease to the public. But even if we still have active cases in our country they are planning to allow/open the tourism. For me it’s not a smart move to open tourism, all I can say is it would be better if they’ll wait for a couple months before reopening it. So that’s all of my assessment to our government’s disaster preparedness plan and response, it’s good for me but it would be better if they’ll response earlier/ faster and rise the budget for disaster management. Those are the things that I think they should imply or do since we are vulnerable to disasters. And as I Filipino citizen I wish that our disaster response in our country will enhance or get supported well in order to protect the people of its country.
Reflection Paper Write A Short Reflection On The Topic. "How Does Global Migration Benefit The Philippines? Will Your Answer Be The Same On Account of The New Development On COVID-19 Pandemic?