Professional Documents
Culture Documents
A1716604750 - 28647 - 7 - 2023 - CA 1.docx (1) 2
A1716604750 - 28647 - 7 - 2023 - CA 1.docx (1) 2
Academic Task-1
Mittal School of Business
OR
NOTE:
2. The Font Size for Headings and the Body should be 14 and 12 respectively
3. Assignment must be uploaded on UMS only. No submission shall be accepted through any others
mediums.
4. Every group has to submit one peer rating format (format attached). Faculty will discuss the
same in the class.
RUBRICS FOR WRITTEN ASSIGNMENT
Moderate
Good Quality,
Quality,
Every major
High Quality, Some points
point was
Every major point were Low Quality,
supported with
was well supported Lack of Poor Quality,
Knowledge & facts, statistics
supported with with facts and support or Points were
authenticity and or examples,
several relevant statistics of examples was Not supported.
but the relevance
facts, statistics and Questionable provided.
of some was
or examples. relevance.
questionable.
Few questions
answered.
Moderate Low sync
Maximum Answer was
All questions number of between
Cross questions not to the
answered questions Industry and
Questioning answered point.
answered Academic
concepts
PRESENTATION SCHEDULE
1. All the team members are required to weigh the amount and quality of work done by their peers (group
members) on a rating scale (called weight) of 1 to 10.
2. There must be a gap of at least three marks between minimum and maximum weight (W).
3. Weights must be written on the front page of the final report.
4. Reports must bear the signature of all the group members.
5. Each member’s marks will be calculated as per the formula= Weights(-)Marks/10
Annexure:1 For Students
Learning Outcomes: (Student to write briefly about learnings obtained from the academic tasks)
Declaration:
I declare that this Assignment is my individual work. I have not copied it from any other
students’ work or from any other source except where due acknowledgement is made
explicitly in the text, nor has any part been written for me by any other person.