MID-YEAR REVIEW FORM (MRF) for Teacher I-III

Name of Employee: Name of Rater:

Position: Position:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: Date of Review:
Rating Period:

Weight
Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per Means of Verification
Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Review
KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks Results
Basic 1. Content 1. Applied 7% 1. Classroom Observation Quality
Educatio Knowledge knowledge of Tool (COT) rating sheets
n and content within and or Inter-observer
Services Pedagogy across curriculum agreement forms done
teaching areas. through on-site/ face-to-
Efficiency
face/ in-person classroom
observation
Timeliness
2. Used a range of 7% 1. Classroom Observation Quality
teaching strategies Tool (COT) rating sheets
that enhance or Inter-observer
learner agreement forms done
through on-site/ face-to- Efficiency
achievement in
literacy and face/ in-person classroom
numeracy skills. observation
Timeliness
3. Applied a range 7% 1. Classroom Observation Quality
of teaching Tool (COT) rating sheets
strategies to or Inter-observer
develop critical agreement forms done
and creative through on-site/ face-to-
face/ in-person classroom Efficiency
thinking, as well as
other higher-order observation
thinking skills.

Timeliness
 Weight Mid-year Review Rating
Mid-year
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per Means of Verification Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal)
Performance Review
KRA Ratin
Target Remarks Rating Remarks Results
g
Basic 2. Learning 4. Managed 7% 1. Classroom Observation Quality
Educatio Environment classroom structure Tool (COT) rating sheets
n and Diversity to engage learners, or Inter-observer
Services of Learners individually or in agreement forms done
groups, in through on-site/ face-to-
meaningful face/ in-person classroom
exploration, Efficiency
observation
discovery and
hands-on activities
within a range of
physical learning
environments.
Timeliness
5. Managed learner 7% 1. Classroom Observation Quality
behavior Tool (COT) rating sheets
constructively by or Inter-observer
applying positive agreement forms done
and non-violent through on-site/ face-to-
discipline to ensure face/ in-person classroom Efficiency
learning-focused observation
environments.

Timeliness
6. Used 7% 1. Classroom Observation Quality
differentiated, Tool (COT) rating sheets
developmentally or Inter-observer
appropriate agreement forms done
learning through on-site/ face-to-
experiences to face/ in-person classroom
address learners’ observation Efficiency
gender, needs,
strengths, interests
and experiences.
 Timeliness

Weight Mid-year Review Rating

Mid-year
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per Means of Verification Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal)
Performance Review
KRA Ratin
Target Remarks Rating Remarks Results
g
Basic 3. Curriculum 7. Planned, 7% 1. Classroom Observation Quality
Educatio and Planning managed and Tool (COT) rating sheets
n implemented or Inter-observer
Services developmentally agreement forms done
sequenced through on-site/ face-to-
teaching and face/ in-person classroom
learning processes Efficiency
observation
to meet curriculum
requirements and
varied teaching
contexts.
Timeliness
8. Participated in 7% 1. Proof/s of attendance in Quality
collegial LAC sessions/ FGDs/
discussions that meetings/ other collegial
use teacher and discussions
learner feedback to 2. Minutes of LAC
enrich teaching sessions/ FGDs/
practice. meetings/ other collegial
discussions on use of
teacher and learner
feedback to enrich
teaching practice
3. Reflection notes of Efficiency
teachers on their
demonstration of teaching Timeliness
practices following
participation from LAC
sessions/ FGDs/
meetings/ other collegial
discussions that use
teacher and learner
feedback to enrich
teaching practice, with
proofs of attendance
4. Any equivalent ALS
 form/document that
highlights the objective

Weight Mid-year Review Rating

Mid-year
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per Means of Verification Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal)
Performance Review
KRA Ratin
Target Remarks Rating Remarks Results
g
9. Selected, 7% 1. Classroom Observation Quality
developed, Tool (COT) rating sheets
organized and used or Inter-observer
appropriate agreement forms done
teaching and Efficiency
through on-site/ face-to-
learning resources, face/ in-person classroom
including ICT, to
observation
address learning
goals. Timeliness
Basic 4. 10. Designed, 7% 1. Classroom Observation Quality
Educatio Assessment selected, organized Tool (COT) rating sheets
n and and used or Inter-observer
Services Reporting diagnostic, agreement forms done
formative and through on-site/ face-to- Efficiency
summative face/ in-person classroom
assessment observation
strategies
consistent with Timeliness
curriculum
requirements.
11. Monitored and 7% Any one (1) of the Quality
evaluated learner following:
progress and
▪ Individual
achievement using
learner attainment Learning
data. Monitoring Plan
(ILMP)
▪ Peer assessment
data
▪ Sample of
learners’ outputs
with reflection/
 self-assessment
Efficiency
▪ Progress charts/
anecdotal records
▪ Class/ e-class
record/ grading
sheets

Weight Means of Mid-year Mid-year Review Results

MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline
per KRA Verification Review
Rating
Ratee Rater
(Teacher) (Principal)
Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Timeliness
▪ Less
on
plan
s
sho
wing
inde
x of
mas
tery
▪ Freq
uen
cy of
error
s
▪ Any
equi
vale
nt
ALS
form
/
doc
ume
 nt Performanc
that e Target
highl
ights
the
obje
ctive
(e.g.
Indiv
idual
Lear
ning
Agre
eme
nt
(ILA
),
ALS
Ass
ess
men
t
For
m 2)
▪ Oth
ers
(ple
ase
spec
ify
and
prov
ide
ann
otati
on)
Basic 5. Personal 12. 7% Any one (1) Quality
Education Growth and Communicat of the
Services Profession ed promptly following:
al and clearly
Developme the learners’
▪ A
nt needs,
progress sam
and ple
achievement of
to key corr
stakeholders ecte
, including d
parents/guar test
dians. pap
er of
a
lear
ner
in a
lear
ning
area
with
pare
nt’s
or
guar
dian’
s
sign
atur
e
and
date
of
rece
ipt
▪ Min
utes
of
mee
tings
with
key
 stak
ehol
ders
(e.g.
PTA
,
SG
C,
SPT
,
CPC
)
with
proo
f of
atte
nda
nce
▪ Rep
ort
card
with
pare
nt’s
or
guar
dian’
s
sign
atur
e in
all
quar
ters
sup
port
ed

MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Means of

per KRA Verification Mid-year Mid-year Review Results
 Review
Rating
Ratee Rater
(Teacher) (Principal)
Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
by Efficiency
min
utes Timeliness
13. Applied 7% A of Quality
a personal reflection/
mee
philosophy journal ting
of teaching entry that
▪ Com
that is highlights
learner- the mun
centered. icati
application
of a on Efficiency
learner-with
centered key
Timeliness
stak
teaching
ehol
philosophy
ders
in the
(e.g.
lesson plan
pare
or
nts/
community
guar
work.
dian

Weight
Mid-year Review Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per Means of Verification Mid-year
Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal)
KRA Review Results
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
14. Set 7% 1. Certification from the Quality
professional ICT Coordinator/ School
development Head/ Focal Person in
goals based charge of
Efficiency
on the e-SAT
Philippine 2. IPCRF-DP
Professional 3. Midyear Review Form
Standards for (MRF) Timeliness
Teachers. 4. Updated IPCRF-DP
 Phase II

Basic Plus Factor 15. Performed 2% Any one (1) proof of: Quality
Education various related
Services works/ ● Committee
activities that involvement
contribute to
the teaching- ● Involvement as
learning module/ learning
process. material writer/
validator
● Involvement as a
resource person/
speaker/ learning
Efficiency
facilitator in the
RO/ SDO/ school-
initiated TV/Radio-
based instruction
● Book or journal
authorship/ co-
authorship/
contributorship
● Advisorship/
coordinatorship/
chairpersonship
● Participation in
demonstration
teaching

Weight
Mid-year Review Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per Means of Verification Mid-year
Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal)
KRA Review Results
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
● Participation as
Timeliness
research presenter
 in a forum/
conference
● Mentoring of pre-
service/ in-service
teachers
● Conducted
research within the
rating period

with annotation on how it

contributed to the
teaching-learning process.

Rater Ratee Approving Authority