Permission to Appeal results – July 2018

Case name Justices PTA Reasons given

In the following cases, the advice which the Board proposes to give to Her Majesty is as indicated below
Select Vantage Inc (Appellant) v Cayman Islands Lord Wilson Refused Permission to appeal should be refused because the application does not
Monetary Authority (Respondent) (Cayman Lord Hughes 10 October 2018 raise an arguable point of law of general public importance.
Islands) Lord Hodge
JCPC 2017/0096

Fitz-Patrick Grant (Appellant) v Herbert Lord Wilson Refused Permission cannot be granted because under section 36(7) of the
(Respondent) (St Christopher and Nevis) Lord Hughes 10 October 2018 Constitution there is no jurisdiction to appeal to the Privy Council.
JCPC 2018/0017 Lord Hodge

The Queen (Respondent) v Lord Wilson Refused Permission to appeal should be refused because there is no risk that a
Noel (Appellant) (Grenada) Lord Hughes 10 October 2018 serious miscarriage of justice has occurred in this case.
JCPC 2018/0016 Lord Hodge

The Queen v Lord Kerr Refused Permission to appeal should be refused because there is no risk that a serious
Gordon and another (Appellants) (Jamaica) Lord Sumption 10 October 2018 miscarriage of justice has occurred in this case.
JCPC 2018/0029 Lord Hughes

Junkanoo Estates Ltd and others (Appellants) v Lord Kerr Refused Permission to appeal should be refused because the application does not
UBS (Bahamas) Ltd (Respondent) (Bahamas) Lord Sumption 10 October 2018 raise an arguable point of law of general public importance which ought to
JCPC 2018/0059 Lord Hughes be considered by the Judicial Committee at this time.