Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Syed Tahir Madam Naila
Syed Tahir Madam Naila
Syed Tahir Madam Naila
BIOGRAPHY
Karl Heinrich Marx was born on 5 May 1818 in Trier in western German, the
son of a successful Jewish lawyer. Marx studied law in Bonn and Berlin, but
was also introduced to the ideas of Hegel and Feuerbach. In 1841, he
received a doctorate in philosophy from the University of Jenin 1849, Marx
moved to London, where he was to spend the remainder of his life. For a
number of years, his family lived in poverty but the wealthier Engels was
able to support them to an increasing extent. Gradually, Marx emerged from
his political and spiritual isolation and produced his most important body of
work, 'Das Capital'. The first volume of this 'bible of the working class' was
published in his lifetime, while the remaining volumes were edited by Engels
after his friend's death.
‘The parson has ever gone hand in hand with the landlord’.
This was especially true in feudal England when the landed classes’ decisions were
frequently legitimated be religious decree: as Marx and Engels saw it, the bourgeois and
the church supported one another: the former generously funded the later, and church
legitimated social inequality, thus maintaining the established social order.
RELLIGION AS EVOLUTION
Marx show that religion may be a toll of
FUNCTION OF RELIGION
According to Marx, one of the main ‘functions’ of religion is to prevent people making
demands for social change by dulling pain of oppression, as follows:
1. The promise of an afterlife gives people something to look forwards to. It is easier to put
up with misery now if you believe you have a life of ‘eternal bliss’ to look forward to after
death.
2. Religion makes a virtue out of suffering – making it appear as if the poor are more
‘Godly’ than the rich. One of the best illustrations of this is the line in the bible: ‘It is
easier for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to enter the
Kingdom of heaven.
3. Religion can offer hope of supernatural intervention to solve problems on earth: this
makes it pointless for humans to try to do anything significant to help improve their
current conditions.
Religion can justify the social order and people’s position within that order, as in the
line in the Victorian hymn ‘All Things Bright and Beautiful’:
Criticisms
Firstly, it is clear that religion does not always prevent social change by creating false
class consciousness. There are plenty of examples of where oppressed groups have used
religion to attempt (whether successful or not is moot here) to bring about social
change, as we will see in the neo-Marxist perspective on religion.
Secondly, religion still exists where there is (arguably) no oppression: the USSR
communist state placed limits on the practice of religion, including banning religious
instruction to children, however, religious belief remained stronger in the 20th century
in Russia and Eastern Europe than it did in the capitalist west.
Thirdly, and building on the previous point: just because religion can be used as a tool
of manipulation and oppression, this does not explain its existence: religion seems to be
more or less universal in all societies, so it is likely that it fulfills other individual and
social needs, possibly in a more positive way as suggested by Functionalist theorists
such as Durkheim, Malinowski, and Parsons.
REFERENCE
1 https://www.biography.com/scholar/karl-marx
2 Raines, John. 2002. "Introduction". Marx on Religion (Marx, Karl). Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Page 5-6
4 McKinnon, AM. (2005). 'Reading ‘Opium of the People’: Expression, Protest and the
Dialectics of Religion'. Critical Sociology, vol 31, no. 1-2, pp. 15-38. [1]