Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 116

CHAPTER I

THE PROBLEM AND REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE AND STUDIES

Introduction

Across the board, Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) has

triggered an unprecedented crisis. It is incontestable that

the pandemic's effects and repercussions differ depending on

one's status as an individual or member of society. This

pandemic has undeniable effects on people's health, ability

to learn, study, and live in the present day. In order to

stop the spread of COVID-19 and mitigate its effects, a

number of educational institutions around the world have

closed or curtailed their physical campuses and face-to-face

operations. Travel restrictions, campus closures, and social

distancing measures have forced university students and

staff to change their lifestyles. For a variety of reasons,

infected regions and countries' university lecturers now

conduct lectures, administrative tasks, and meetings online

(Pokhrel and Chhetri, 2021).

According to CHED, about 1,000-degree programs at 313

institutions and colleges offer traditional in-person

classes. Prospero "Popoy" De Vera, chairman of the

Commission for Higher Education (CHEd), said HEIs in

pandemic Alert Level 1 zones can hold classes at full

Page 1
capacity. Schools must follow CHEd and IATF requirements to

protect students and faculty from COVID-19. All students and

teachers who want to participate must be completely

vaccinated against COVID-19 and signed up with PhilHealth.

With the high-speed internet and mobile devices,

multiple modes of learning (distance, blended, flexible,

etc.) are now possible no matter where students are. As a

result of the recent coronavirus outbreak, institutions have

increased the use of blended learning, which blends online

and in-person learning. At PHINMA-Araullo University and

other PHINMA educational institutions, they use FLEX

Learning, a combination of face-to-face and home-based

learning (with modules).

Flexible learning is defined by the Commission on

Higher Education (CHED) Memorandum Order No. 04 as "a

pedagogical method permitting flexible time, place, and

audience, but not entirely centered on the use of

technology." The design and delivery of programs address the

learner's individual needs in terms of place, pace,

procedure, and learning. It is a notion where students can

perform their work from home using online learning

resources. It enables flexible study hours and the

simplicity of completing assignments at their own pace and

Page 2
convenience in the comfort of their home setting, which can

lead to increased performance.

Flexible learning encourages students to take entire

responsibility for their education and learning outcomes.

Because students can choose and schedule their lessons, they

are not free from other duties. They can use this control to

make sure they study when it works best for their schedules

and other responsibilities. 

In summary, flexible learning is used to satisfy

students' educational demands that cannot be met in normal

classrooms because of the pandemic. Measuring effectiveness

involves using new knowledge in real-world circumstances and

tasks. Simply put, it is a tool that allows teachers to

assess how well their students performed on multiple

activities.

The goal of this research is to find out if and how

online classrooms for flexible learning could be a valuable

tool for education in times of difficulties and how this

study could help students evaluate their situations in terms

of challenges they may face, enhancing their independence

and ability to adapt. Researchers were motivated to conduct

this study in hopes of improving the quality of education

for each and every learner in terms of flexible learning,

providing support for existing ideas and theories pertaining

Page 3
to this subject matter, and having an impact on the future

practices of other educational institutions. This study is

vital for everyone interested in learning, regardless of

academic affiliation.

Review of Related Literature

The following were the literature and study that were

reviewed for “Effectiveness of an Online Classroom for

Flexible Learning of Fourth-Year BSMA Students at PHINMA-

Araullo University". Due to the extensive amount of

information available on the subject of students’, only

information pertinent to the research is presented.

Furthermore, information with similar ideas has been grouped

into sections for easier reading and comprehension.

“A Quantitative Analysis of Flexible Learning and the

Factors Influencing the Academic Performance of BSBA

Students in PHINMA-University of Pangasinan”, as studied by

Llusala, Cuison, Baligod, Gallardo, and Reside (January

2021). As a result of the COVID-19 pandemic that hit the

country in the summer of 2020, all schools, private and

public alike, have been forced to implement online and

flexible learning options. The study's goal is to evaluate

what factors influence the students’ academic performance in

flexible learning. Researchers discovered that there was a

Page 4
significant influence on student participation, critical

thinking, and technology application.

The findings emphasize that academic performance is

said to be influenced by being engaged or actively

participating in the mode of flexible learning. Furthermore,

class participation plays a crucial role in achieving the

academic success of the selected students of BSBA. On the

other hand, critical thinking has a significant influence on

the BSBA Students as investigated from the study, it says

that students were struggling in comprehending their

lessons, and applying their critical thinking is tough in

flexible learning. Lastly, technology applications are also

indicated to have a significant influence on students’

performance.

In lieu, collaborative skills and creativity and

innovation resulted in neutral effect, meaning that these

factors may or may not influence their performance.

FACTORS INFLUENCING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF AN ONLINE CLASSROOM

FOR FLEXIBLE LEARNING

● Participation Level in Flexible Learning

According to Lee and Recker (2021), the level of

student involvement and participation determines the

efficacy of online and flexible education. Despite the

Page 5
difficulties, Dascalu and Matu (2021), found that during the

COVID-19 pandemic, student participation in online

interaction and collaboration via Moodle and other learning

management systems increased significantly.

Online discussions, on the authority of Selvaraj,

Vishnu, KA, Benson, and Mathew (2021), provide a safe space

for students to exchange ideas while also allowing them the

freedom to choose their own study schedules and participate

at any time. Because parents can keep tabs on their

children's progress and attendance in class when they take

classes from home, there is a higher likelihood that

students will attend regularly (i.e., not miss any classes).

Direct synchronous video conferencing allows students and

teachers to engage in questioning, debating, and sharing

information at a higher level of student participation than

is possible in traditional face-to-face classrooms, which is

essential for student engagement in online and other types

of learning classes.

As maintained by Arce (2015), however, if there is less

participation and isolation among students in flexible

learning, there is a greater risk of students dropping out.

Dropout rates in higher education (HE) have become a major

concern because education authorities use them as a key

metric for evaluating the quality and allocating resources.

Page 6
Dropping out of school can have a negative effect on a

student's self-esteem, well-being, job prospects, and

chances of getting a degree.

● Critical Thinking in Flexible Learning

Critical thinking (CT) is an essential skill that has

been recommended by governments and educational institutions

globally to enhance performance in education, especially

among the younger generation. Numerous educational

authorities and political leaders from throughout the world

have promoted critical thinking as a necessary 21st-century

learning capacity. Students' academic success can be

improved through critical thinking, according to research,

and it can be taught effectively in both flexible and

traditional classrooms. However, online critical thinking

instruction has little effect on critical thinking skills.

According to Stegmann, Wecker, Weinberger and Fischer

(2012), implementing online collaborative cooperation is one

of the most effective strategies to promote students'

critical thinking, interactivity, and creativity. Another

study indicated that students rarely demonstrate high levels

of critical thinking and engagement in online debates, which

is obvious when the dialogue is uncollaborative and

superficial, as opposed to the first study. Learning through

the use of realistic simulations, for example, can inspire

Page 7
students to think critically, enhance their level of

involvement, and stimulate the production of new ideas, all

of which are beneficial.

● Creativity and Innovation in Flexible Learning

When it comes to the learning environment, Lee and

Recker (2021) note that it may give students an opportunity

to explore new ideas in the subject matter, as well as build

social presence and presentation abilities. Face-to-face

classrooms can be replaced by online classes, which allow

students to work together in groups and share ideas with

each other. As explained by Songkram (2017), higher

education is concerned with students' ability to learn and

grow through the use of creativity and innovation. Higher

education's primary purpose, as claimed by Whyke's

dissertation, is to educate students for the day-to-day,

professional, and societal issues they will face after

graduation. A college education is incomplete without a

thorough grounding in a particular field's body of

knowledge. For example, as specified by Cambridge Assessment

International Education (CAIE), students use computers,

iPads, phones, or tablets to access online resources and

explore new meanings, ideas, designs, applications, and

innovations through virtual labs and manipulatives, and

other related courses.

Page 8
Saroff (2019), noted that innovation and originality

should be a basic aspect of any education, and online

teaching and learning are no exception. As demonstrated by

Chi and Wylie (2014), and Henriksen, Creely, Henderson, and

Mishra (2021), online instructional and learning tools can

contribute to the development of a deep grasp of concepts in

subjects, given that the tools are properly integrated into

the learning system.

● Collaborative Skills in Flexible Learning

As stated by activity theory, working collectively to

achieve a specific goal creates an influential learning

atmosphere that helps in agile knowledge construction. The

pedagogical argument that students grasp and formulate ideas

through collective education further supports the theory and

is the basis for online collaborative learning. Several

researchers have identified Collaborative Skill as a means

of improving student success in online learning as it

enhances participation, builds students’ confidence, and

facilitates a better understanding of course contents.

The article by Olakanmi (2017), quoted student D’s

remarks regarding the efficacy of online Classroom as

follows: “We were able to help each other in figuring out

the online teacher’s explanation of the rate of chemical

reaction in our group, which in a way contributed to our

Page 9
understanding of the content.” This remark supports the

study by Zhu (2012), who stated that online group learning

goes beyond improving individual performance, meaning it may

also enhance the entire group performance by raising the

quality of their productivity and helps students better

understand course content in online or flexible classes,

which in turn improves performance.

Kanuka (2015), recommended the blending of threaded

discussion and collective online teamwork with case studies

to enable students to comprehend complicated problems. Jung

et al. observed that undergraduate students who participated

in online collaborative lessons felt more Effective with

their learning compared to those who did not. In the light

of these findings in the literature, one may hypothetically

state that collaborative online learning positively

influences student performance.

● Technology Application in Flexible learning

Flexible teaching and learning may include the use of

different technological tools, for example, digital devices

(computers and phones), the internet, online application

tools, videos, and different software packages, as mentioned

by Gupta, S.B.; Gupta, M. (2020). Technological

advancements and e-learning are approaches that require the

traditional modes of teaching and learning to be reframed

Page 10
and restructured. It requires a significant investment on

the part of a variety of stakeholders, including educational

institutions, teachers, and students. Teachers should be

compensated and rewarded in order to adapt new and

innovative teaching and learning strategies. Thus, in order

to meet the educational demands of the 21st century, it is

critical to employ innovative educational approaches.

Moreover, Dyer, T.; Larson, E.; Steele, J.; Holbeck, R

(2015), emphasizes that the integration of different

technological tools into online learning provides students

with opportunities to engage in collaboration, construction,

and multiple learning options or choices.

According to Li, C.; Lalani, F (2020), technology has

played a major role in the implementation of online learning

all over the world during the COVID-19 pandemic. Technology-

supported online learning systems not only help in

collaboration through interaction and communication, but

they also help students retain more information than in

traditional face-to-face classes. Technology applications in

online learning provide greater flexibility for students to

learn, share, and process information in a variety of ways.

As stated by Selvaraj, A.; Radhin, V.; Nithin, K.A.;

Benson, N.; Mathew, A.J. (2021), effective use of

communication technology during online classes enhances

Page 11
student-teacher interaction and collaboration. However, it

depends on teachers’ ability to integrate such tools into

virtual classes.

Students' and teachers' use of online web-based tools,

such as learning management systems, applications, different

learning and teaching resources (Biundo, 2017), has a

significant impact on how online and flexible learning is

implemented. Companion technology, as defined by Biundo and

Wendemuth (2017), is a cognitive technical system that

focuses on user competence, adaptation, access, safety,

cooperation, trust, and flexibility in technology-human

interaction. HTI (Human-Technology Interaction) was used by

the researchers as a means of understanding students'

performance in using technological tools to access class and

resources for their learning in both live virtual classrooms

and off-line.

Theoretical Framework

The conduct of this study was based on the Activity

Theory of Lev Vygotsky (2016), which focused on how

mediators (the subject, the object, and method) make it

easier for these three things to talk to each other that

includes five elements: Participation Level, Critical

Thinking, Creativity and Innovation, Collaborative Skills

Page 12
and Technology Application for realizing the effective model

to acquire knowledge in modern era.

What Vygotsky explains is that activity theory places

an emphasis on the subject, object, and method used to carry

out an action in a given context. The community where the

action is taking place has some rules or norms based on the

division of responsibilities and the potential outcomes to

be shared by the members. These three mediators are further

interconnected. However, there were many motivations for

employing Activity Theory as a theoretical framework:

First of all, participation level, activity theory

places an educational endeavor in its proper societal

context. The paradigm is helpful for figuring out how

student teachers see the role of online discussion boards in

higher education.

Second, critical thinking, activity theory can be used

to look at how a student educator sees asynchronous

discussion forums as a way to get people to think critically

and take part. In addition, the framework is good for this

research because of how asynchronous discussion forums were

added to the learning process to help with critical

thinking.

Third, creativity and innovation, students become

engaged in online lectures, the study showed, particularly

Page 13
when the exercises make clear the relevance to problem-

solving scenarios like real-world situations. According to

Activity Theory, using real-world scenarios and challenges

in class helps students better understand how concepts might

be used in the real world that nurture their inner endeavor

to be creative in facing such obstacles. Subjects are more

likely to use the tools, act out their roles, and follow the

rules if they are real. They will also learn more from doing

these things at their own pace and style.

Fourth, collaborative skills, the social character of

online environments, which depict a learner as both an

individual and a part of a wider community, makes Activity

Theory an appropriate paradigm for online learning

environments. So, the framework helps us understand how

students individually and as a group use asynchronous

discussion platforms to help them think critically and reach

their learning goals.

Lastly, technology application, when all is said and

done, activity theory serves as a framework that simplifies

the analysis of massive amounts of real-world data. The

student instructors' opinions on the usefulness of

asynchronous discussion forums and their interactions with

one another were two of the many factors taken into account

in this research. It would have been challenging to manage

Page 14
and understand the processes involved with these

technologies on an individual or group basis without the use

of such a framework.

Conceptual Framework

Figure 1. Research Paradigm

Figure 1, Paradigm of the study uses the dependent and

independent schema. The independent shows the profile of the

respondents, which includes: age, sex, number of hours

during of online learning, internet service connection, and

Page 15
online learning environment. Also, it involves participation

level (PL), critical thinking (CT), creativity and

innovation (CI), collaborative skills (CS), and technology

application (TA).

Based on the findings, the dependent shows the proposed

action plan and activities to improve the online classroom

and address the challenges for flexible learning.

Statement of the Problem

The prime objective of the study is to determine the

effectiveness of an online classroom for the flexible

learning of fourth-year BSMA students at PILINMA-Araullo

University.

Specifically, it sought to answer the following

queries:

1. How may the profile of the respondents be described in

terms of:

1.1 Age;

1.2 Sex;

1.3 Number of hours during Online Learning;

1.4 Internet Service Connection; and

1.5 Online Learning Environment

Page 16
2. How may the effectiveness of online classroom for

flexible learning of 4th-year BSMA students be described in

terms of:

2.1 Participation Level (PL);

2.2 Critical Thinking (CT);

2.3 Creativity and Innovation (CI);

2.4 Collaborative Skill (CS); and

2.5 Technology Application (TA)

3. What difficulties did students face when engaging in an

online classroom for flexible learning?

4. Is there a significant relationship among age, and number

of hours during online learning with the effectiveness of

online classrooms for flexible learning?

5. Is there any significant difference among sex, internet

service connection, and online learning environment with the

effectiveness of online classroom for flexible learning?

6. What are the actions and activities that may be proposed

based on the findings of the study?

Hypotheses of the Study

Based from the questions above, the null hypothesis was

formulated in this study:

Page 17
Ho1. There is no significant relationship among age, and

number of hours during online learning with the

effectiveness of online classrooms for flexible learning.

Ho2. There is no significant difference among sex, internet

service connection, and online learning environment with the

effectiveness of online classroom for flexible learning.

Significance of the Study

COVID-19 has restricted the actions of educators and

students alike. As a result, most students now learn from

home. For students with hectic schedules and limited time,

flexible learning has made quality education attainable.

Despite its many benefits, flexible learning has several

downsides. As a result, more students are obtaining degrees

to keep up with changing educational trends.

The findings of this research have significant

implications for the following sectors:

Students. This study will be a help in attaining their

own progress. It will encourage them to focus on what is

important and seek a way out of the destruction. Students

can use this study to assess, evaluate, and judge if the

online classroom for flexible learning enhances their skills

and abilities. Also, once they have felt the pressure and

burden of their studies, it will serve as a prompt to reach

Page 18
out for assistance from trusted advisors or teachers. It

will also lead to and help build a good relationship between

the teacher and the student.

Teachers. It will serve as an eye-opener that they are

an important part of the students’ learning, regardless of

the set up. When it comes to flexible learning environments

like this, they can use this study to obtain a better idea

on what kinds of requirements, deadlines, and consideration

they should give to the class. Their students will be able

to work better within their capabilities if they can follow

this guidance. It will help them focus and direct their

students so that they can work to the best of their

abilities as it also improves their teaching methods,

knowledge, and strategies in all online subject courses for

flexible learning. They can be a resource to the students

because of their higher levels of education.

PHINMA-Araullo University. This research could help

them be ready to use flexible learning as a teaching

strategy in the coming academic year(s). Its ultimate goal

is to encourage the creation of new materials for use in

classrooms. This research will help the school get a handle

on how students are faring in their online courses, and it

will hopefully lead to the discovery of new tools and

techniques that will allow those students to develop and

Page 19
learn in a less weighty but more fruitful manner. Teachers

and students both benefit from the information provided here

and report that it has been essential in furthering their

understanding of the issue at hand. The comprehensive

information it imparts will be crucial in influencing the

futures of all students who find themselves in a similar

scenario, making it a cornerstone for its development and

enhancement.

Researchers. The researcher could provide a foundation

to solve the issues they are trying to address that they

personally encountered as a student of an online classroom

for flexible learning set-up. This will lead to a

comprehensive understanding of how flexible learning

influences the students. Moreover, it develops answers to

questions the researchers have in their minds before

conducting this study. Also, they will learn more and will

be better equipped to take advantage of the opportunities

that come their way. It provides a path, especially when the

situation has something to do with becoming aware of various

issues related to this study.

Future Researchers. This study is relevant for the

provision of ideas concerning factors influencing the

effectiveness of an online classroom for flexible learning

set-up that further improves their knowledge about this

Page 20
certain matter. This will encourage them to add

reinforcements that would expand its domain and range.

Scope and Delimitation

The study is to find out if and how online classrooms

for flexible learning could be a valuable tool for education

in times of difficulties and how this study could help

students evaluate their situations in terms of challenges

they may face, enhancing their independence and ability to

adapt that contribute to their ability to learn as the

fourth year of the BSMA program at PHINMA-Araullo University

in terms of participation level, critical thinking,

creativity and innovation, collaborative skills, and

technology application. The respondents' demographic profile

is limited to age, sex, number of hours during online

learning, internet service connection, and online learning

environment. Total enumeration sampling technique of

respondents was used to conduct this study. Survey

questionnaires were distributed to the 4th year BSMA

students of PHINMA-Araullo University who experienced or

enrolled in an online classroom for flexible learning. Thus,

consequently influencing the effectiveness of online

classrooms for flexible learning, such as their teacher's

behavior and personality, parental habits and involvement,

Page 21
as well as peer influence are not within the scope of the

research.

Definition of Terms

To provide a common frame of reference and to

ensure understanding of the contents of this study, the

following are hereby defined technically and operationally:

Activity Theory. As a theoretical framework, it

examines interactions between teachers and students and

their tools and artifacts.

Bachelor of Science in Management Accounting (BSMA).

This degree program prepares students for careers in

managerial accounting, which includes controllership,

capital budgeting and project planning, responsibility

accounting, cost accounting, and cost-benefit analysis.

Collaborative Skills. It can be defined as an

individual's interpersonal and intra-personal abilities and

competencies in addressing an issue or progressing toward a

common objective as a group.

Creativity. It is both the ability and the act of

making something new and potentially valuable out of

nothing.

Critical Thinking. It conceptualizes, uses, analyzes,

synthesizes, or evaluates knowledge obtained from or

Page 22
generated by observation, experience, contemplation,

reasoning or communication as a guide to belief and action.

Effectiveness. It refers to the ability to generate the

desired outcome or result is referred to as "having the

ability to generate." To be effective, something must either

do what it is supposed to do or have an effect that lasts.

Flexible Learning. It is the combination of two (2)

days face-to-face learning and home-based learning

(modular).

Innovation. A new thing, such as an invention, or the

method of creating and introducing new things.

Internet Service Connection. It refers to how students

connect to the Internet, which can include mobile/network

data, broadband or wifi (whether limited or unlimited).

Online Classroom. It is an environment where students

and teachers utilize a learning management system to

establish a virtual space where they can communicate in real

time (teachers and students meeting in person at the same

time) or asynchronously (intermittently with a time lag

between teacher and student involvement).

Number of hours during Online Learning. It refers to

the regularity with which a specific individual studies in

an online classroom within the period allotted.

Page 23
Online learning environment. It is one in which the

teacher and the students are not in the same room, but

rather in a shared virtual place where they can learn

without fear of retribution and find motivation from their

peers.

Participation Level. It is collaborating with others to

accomplish a common goal. It is important to attend class to

get good grades.

Technology Application. It refers to the process of

applying software and systems that assist administrative and

educational tasks on school equipment.

CHAPTER II

RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

This chapter presented the details of the research

methodology. It presented the research design, research

Gantt chart, respondents and locale of the study, sampling

procedure, research instrument, data collection, and tools

for data analysis and management.

Research Design

The researchers used descriptive research. Descriptive

research tends to examine participants in an accurate way.

It describes an existing condition. This is quantitative

research that requires interpretation, analysis, and

Page 24
collection of data. It is an alternative methodological

approach that allows researchers to investigate and

comprehend the effectiveness of an online classroom for

flexible learning of 4th year BSMA students at PHINMA-

Araullo University in greater depth.

The goal of descriptive research is to describe a

phenomenon and its characteristics. This research is more

concerned with what rather than how or why something has

happened. Therefore, observation and survey tools are often

used to gather data (Gall, Gall, & Borg, 2007). In such

research, the data may be collected qualitatively, but it is

often analyzed quantitatively, using frequencies,

percentages, averages, or other statistical analyses to

determine relationships.

Research Gantt Chart

Page 25
Figure 2. Gantt Chart of the Study

Figure 2 presented the Gantt chart for the research

project. This was used for scheduling tasks, keeping track

of progress, and visually organizing the timetable of

actions involved in creating this research paper. This

figure presents the proponent structure in the form of a

calendar outlining the events that took place on a monthly

basis. The chart demonstrates that throughout the course of

two semesters, the proponent engaged in a variety of

activities in order to accomplish distinct aims.

Page 26
Research for this study began with the development of a

research proposal, which took place between the second and

third weeks of January and was submitted in the fourth week

of the same month. The researchers undertook the literature

review and studies in the first week of February after

receiving approval to begin the study, and then have the

first chapter ready to submit by the end of the month.

Researchers started the Research Methodology by getting

approval from higher-ups to conduct the study and

confirmation from the registrar on the desired sample size,

the researchers turned in all of Chapter 2 at the end of

March. From the first to the second week of April,

researchers develop a research instrument based on the

study's statement of the problem, which includes two

sections: the respondent profile and the five criterias.

This phase was the last for this semester, and the other

things to be continued in the next semester by the

researchers with the same study.

The next semester officially began with the Conducting

Survey for Reliability Testing that modified Chapter II

under the Validity and Reliability of the Study in the first

week of August. Afterward, beginning on the second of the

same month, the researchers were given permission by the

research adviser to administer the survey questionnaire to

Page 27
the fourth-year BSMA students. The third week is spent

analyzing and interpreting the data. Researchers are

providing a summary of their findings and interpretation

during the last week of August. The study's findings and

suggestions were presented by the researchers within the

same week. The advisor scheduled a meeting for the first

week of September with the purpose of looking through the

paper and correcting any faults that were found. The final

meeting was done in the third week of September as

preparation for the final defense. Finally, in the first

week of October, the researchers will be presenting their

research paper to the set of panelists.

Locale of the Study

This study was conducted at PHINMA Araullo University

Main Campus located at Maharlika Highway, Barangay Bitas,

3100 Cabanatuan City, Nueva Ecija, during S.Y 2022-2023.

PHINMA-Araullo University (formally Pamantasan ng

Araullo, Inc.), colloquially called “AU”, “PHINMA-AU”, or

simply “Araullo”, is a private, non-sectarian university in

Cabanatuan City, Nueva Ecija, Philippines. The university

offers a wide range of secondary, undergraduate, and

graduate programs in its three campuses. Given that the

respondents of the study are the 4th year BSMA students of

Page 28
PHINMA-Araullo University the said University is the most

credible locale of the study.

Figure 3. Vicinity Map

Sample and Sampling Procedure

The researcher used total enumeration of population. It

means that all the 4th year BSMA students that are currently

enrolled in online classrooms for flexible learning are part

of the study. The 175-population sample size of this study

as the researchers scientifically concluded that using the

entire population is sustainable in generalization of

Page 29
findings. The feasibility of the population in terms of time

and resources is considered which provide valid reasons for

conducting this study using the entire population.

Program Enrolled No. of Students

4th year - BSMA-1 27

4th year - BSMA-2 24

4th year - BSMA-3 25

4th year - BSMA-4 24

4th year - BSMA-5 25

4th year - BSMA-6 25

4th year - BSMA-7 25

TOTAL 175

Table 1. Respondents of the Study


Sources: University Registrar and College of
Management and Accountancy

Construction of the Instrument

For this study, a survey questionnaire was the primary

method of collecting data from the participants to make this

study successful. The following checklist used to gather

data:

Profile Checklist. This checklist is designed to draw

important data and information about the students

specifically on the following: age, sex, number of hours

during online learning, internet service connection, and

online learning environment.

Page 30
Factors Checklist. This checklist corresponds to 25

statements to ask the respondents about the factors

influencing the effectiveness of online classroom for

flexible learning in terms of: participation level (PL),

critical thinking (CT), creativity and innovation (CI),

collaborative skills (CS), and technology application (TA)

which the respondents should answer based on their

experiences.

Four options were provided to the respondents for their

response:

Level of Response Range Verbal Description

4 3.25 - 4.00 Strongly Agree

3 2.50 - 3.24 Agree

2 1.75 - 2.49 Disagree

1 1.00 - 1.74 Strongly Disagree

Table 2. 4-point Likert Scale

Challenges Checklist. This checklist is composed of 15

challenges whereas researchers concluded that respondents

experienced while participating in an online classroom for

flexible learning. It employs Check Option Scale, a sort of

scale ranking that uses selectable options (checkboxes) as

the metric for placement. There is a box to check off next

to each of the available options for them to select from. By

Page 31
marking the appropriate boxes, the respondents have the

ability to choose the choices based on their experiences.

Validation and Reliability of the Instrument

● Validity

The research adviser approved the questionnaire before

distribution. The researchers had their research teacher, an

expert in the creation and execution of educational policy,

review the questionnaire to confirm its accuracy. The

research study was also validated by the presence of

panelists in the pre-oral defense, as well reviewed the

survey questionnaire and provided feedback, which was used

to inform subsequent iterations of the survey and to refine

the research.

● Reliability

To ensure the reliability of the questionnaire, the

researchers administered the questionnaire to a set of

fifteen (15) BSA students from PHINMA-Araullo University.

The questionnaire was statistically analyzed for reliability

through Cronbach’s Alpha in IBM SPSS® Statistics software.

The 72.3% shows the results of reliability statistics

generated by IBM SPSS® Statistics software. Given that it

received a score of 72.3%, the researchers are able to draw

the conclusion that the questionnaire is reliable.

Page 32
Data Gathering Procedure

The study used different courses of actions to gather

adequate information necessary for the completion and

accomplishment of the study. The researchers collected

primary data by gathering information directly from actual

respondents. The survey questionnaires were formulated by

the researchers and was based from the review of related

literature and studies. In collecting the data needed on

this study, the researchers considered the following:

Request for Permission. To begin with, the researchers

asked for authorization from the top management of PHINMA-

Araullo University to conduct the research study.

Determine the sample size. Upon determining the

population, which is 175, and all are part of the study.

Construction of Survey Questionnaire. The survey

questionnaire was formulated by the researchers based on the

review of related literature and sent to the respective

respondents to be distributed through printed

questionnaires. The survey questionnaires were inputted to a

paper survey as a tool to gather data. The printed

questionnaires were distributed personally by the

researchers to all of the 4th year BSMA sections. It was

administered in each section after each adviser gave their

permission.

Page 33
Consent and privacy. The researchers asked for the

permission of the teachers of their target classes to

conduct their study. The researchers guarantee that their

respondents’ profile and answers would be treated with

confidentiality.

Distribution and Collection of Survey Questionnaires.

The questionnaires were distributed to the respondents via

printed questionnaires. The researchers are able to gather

data and information related to their study. They collected

the survey forms, tally the answers, analyze and interpret

the results.

Statistical Treatment of Data

The data for the survey questionnaires were collected

by researchers, and then they were statistically evaluated

to arrive at the following conclusions:

Percentage and Frequency. Respondents' demographic

profiles are calculated with the help of this tool. It was

used to determine the percentage of survey takers that

provided a specific response to each of the survey's stated

questions and challenges encountered in an online classroom

during flexible learning.

The following formula will be used:

P = f x 100
N

Page 34
Where:

P = percentage N = total number of cases

f = frequency

Weighted Mean. This tool was used to answer the second

question, "How may the effectiveness of online classrooms

for flexible learning of 4th-year BSMA students be

described?"

The formula of weighted mean is as follows:

WM = ∑wX
Where: ∑w

WM = weighted mean w = weighting factor

∑= summation sign x = observed phenomenon

The weighted mean was verbally described using the


following scale:

Table 3

Values and verbal interpretation

Level of Range Verbal Verbal


Response Description Interpretation

4 3.25 - 4.00 Strongly Agree Highly


Effective

3 2.50 - 3.24 Agree Effective

2 1.75 - 2.49 Disagree Ineffective

1 1.00 - 1.74 Strongly Highly


Disagree Ineffective

Page 35
Pearson's R Correlation. This tool was used to answer

the fourth problem which is, "Is there a significant

relationship among age, and number of hours during online

learning with the effectiveness of online classrooms for

flexible learning?". IBM SPSS® Statistics software was used

in the computation of the gathered data.

Table 4

Table of Correlation Interpretation

Measure of Relationship Interpretation

Computed Value > Critical Value Accept Ho

Computed Value < Critical Value Reject Ho

ANOVA. This tool was used to answer the fifth problem

which is: “Is there any significant difference among sex,

internet service connection, and online learning environment

with the effectiveness of online classroom for flexible

learning?”. The collected data was analyzed using IBM SPSS®

Statistics software.

Table 5

Table of Anova Interpretation

Measure of Relationship Interpretation

More than 0.05 Accept Ho

Less than 0.05 Reject Ho

Page 36
CHAPTER III

PRESENTATION, ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION OF DATA

This chapter compiled and comprehensively presented the

acquired data with the researchers' perspective of answering

the specific questions outlined in Chapter I of this study

regarding the effectiveness of an online classroom for

flexible learning. It also includes the presentation,

analysis and interpretation of data gathered by the

researchers through the use of the research instrument.

These data were presented in tabular and textual form. The

discussion follows the order of the problems posted in

Chapter I.

Analysis of Data

The following quantitative information was utilized

from the responses drawn in the research instrument

disseminated to the respondents of the study. The responses

were tabulated and were used to answer the following

questions:

1. Profile of the respondent

1.1. Age
Table 6
Distribution of the respondents According to Age

Age Frequency Percentage

19 1 0.57%

Page 37
20 30 17.14%

21 111 63.43%

22 33 18.86%

Total 175 100%

Table 6 shows the frequency and percentage distribution

of respondents according to age. Out of 175 respondents,

there were 111 or 63.43% of the respondents whose age is 21,

followed by 33 or 18.86% whose age is 22, next is 30 or

17.14% whose age is 20, while the remaining 1 or 0.57% of

the respondents' age is 19 years old.

It was exposed that respondents aging 21 years old have

the greatest number on this. Meaning, the average age of 4th

year BSMA students of PHINMA-Araullo University is 21 years

old.

According to the statistics provided by the Philippines

Education System (2022), it takes an average of four years

to earn a bachelor's degree. The ages of 19 and 22 are

considered the normal range for students (including the 2

years of senior high school).

1.2. Sex
Table 7
Distribution of the respondents According to Sex

Gender Frequency Percentage

Male 31 17.71%

Page 38
Female 144 82.29%

TOTAL 175 100%

Table 7 flashed the frequency and percentage

distribution of respondents according to sex. It can be

inferred from the table that 144 or 82.29% of the

respondents are female, and the remaining 31 or 17.71% are

male.

The data implies that the majority of the respondents

were female. This means that the majority of the 4th BSMA

students who enrolled at PHINMA Araullo University were

mostly female.

The University of Alabama in Birmingham (UAB),

(December 2021). As the saying goes, women's unique life and

work experiences provide them an edge in the business sector

and managerial positions since they bring fresh ideas and

perspectives to the table. In addition, they have special

abilities. As a result, people will have varying

perspectives, dietary choices, and overall approaches. Since

the beginning of the 21st century, a growing number of women

—sometimes even at a faster rate than men—have decided to go

out on their own and launch their own companies, which have

generally met with great success. The world of business is

one in which women are able to have, and indeed ought to

have, a significant presence.

Page 39
1.3. Number of hours during Online Learning

Table 8
Distribution of the respondents According to the Number
of hours during Online Learning

Number of hours during Online Frequency Percentage


Learning

4 hours 37 21.14%

5 hours 65 37.14%

6 hours 50 28.57%

7 hours 18 10.29%

8 hours and above 5 2.86%

TOTAL 175 100%

Table 8 displayed the frequency and percentage

distribution of respondents according to the number of hours

during Online Learning. From 175 respondents, 65 or 37.14%

of respondents were studying for 5 hours, followed by 50 or

28.57% for 6 hours, next is 37 or 21.14% for 4 hours, after

that 18 or 10.29% for 7 hours, and the remaining 5 of 2.86%

were studying for 8 hours and above.

The data implies that the majority of the respondents

were studying for about five (5) hours.

According to the information provided by Kots (2021),

instead of the usual 25–30 hours, a student will spend an

Page 40
average of just 15-20 (3.75-5 hours). Since they will be

spending less time in class, students will have more

flexibility in their schedules to devote to studying and

completing other types of college-level work, such as

research or projects. It is likely that a student will need

to adapt their prior study habits, test-taking strategies,

and scholastic background to the specific requirements of

the institution(s) they hope to attend. Students can now

personalize their educational experience to better suit

their own needs and interests. In a recent change to its

instructional format, PHINMA Education decided to implement

two days of face-to-face classes and another two days for

remote learning in an online classroom. Based on students'

reported need for between four (4) and eight (8) hours of

daily in-class time, the school adjusted its remote learning

schedule accordingly. Afterall, Raymundo P. Reyes, the

country head of PHINMA Education in the Philippines stated,

“Despite the difficulties that may arise, schooling must go

on. All Filipino students, but especially those who are

eager to learn but lack the means to do so, should have

access to a high-quality education.”

1.4. Internet Service Connection

Table 9
Distribution of the respondents According to the
Internet Service Connection

Page 41
Internet Service Connection Frequency Percentage

Mobile Networks/Data 67 38.29%

Broadband 1 0.57%

Wifi (Limited) 21 12%

Wifi (Unlimited) 86 49.14%

TOTAL 175 100%

The frequency and percentage distribution of

respondents based on Internet Service Connection is shown in

Table 9. Among the 175 respondents, 86 or 49.14% used wifi

(unlimited), following that 67 or 38.29% used mobile

networks/data, then 21 or 12% used wifi (limited), and the

remaining 1 or 0.57% used broadband throughout their online

classrooms for flexible learning.

The data suggested that the majority of respondents

engaged in flexible learning in an online classroom using

their unlimited wifi.

According to a recent poll by the EdWeek Research

Center and Lieberman (2021), more than three-quarters of

teachers said that 75% or more of their students have access

to high-quality internet connections at home, which lets

them take online classes regularly.

1.5. Online Learning Environment

Table 10

Page 42
Distribution of the respondents According to the Online
Learning Environment

Online Learning Environment Frequency Percentage

Quiet and Encouraging Environment 80 45.71%

Noisy and Distracting Environment 95 54.29%

TOTAL 175 100%

Table 10 flaunted the frequency and percentage

distribution of respondents according to the Online Learning

Environment. According to the table, 95 or 54.29% of

respondents are in a noisy and distracting environment,

while the remaining 80, or 45.71% are in a quiet and

encouraging environment.

According to the data, the majority of respondents were

studying in a noisy and distracting environment while

participating in flexible learning in an online classroom.

On the blog of Hendrix (2019), "How your surroundings

affect the way you study." Numerous studies have found that

students' performance in class is significantly affected by

their exposure to an online learning environment. The

ability to concentrate can be affected by a number of

factors, including where the pupils are situated, how much

natural light and background noise there is, and even the

color of the walls. Research shows that pupils who study in

an encouraging setting develop more interest in, aptitude

Page 43
for, and mastery of their coursework. However, in classes

where the environment is poor owing to things like physical

discomfort, excessive noise, or a lack of attention, it is

far more difficult for pupils to retain information and

sustain their interest. In these settings, it is much harder

to keep people's attention and interest in what is being

taught.

2. Effectiveness of an online classroom for flexible

learning of 4th-year BSMA students

2.1. Participation Level (PL)

Table 11
Distribution of respondents according to the
Participation Level (PL)
Participation Level Weighted Verbal
Mean Interpretation

1. I often contribute to a 3.03 Effective


learning opportunity that is
held in an online classroom for
flexible learning.

2. As a result of my schedule, I 2.99 Effective


make greater use of online
classrooms for flexible learning
to supplement my education.

3. I actively check the online 2.97 Effective


classroom to engage with
student-teacher interaction for
flexible learning.

4. Clarification sessions are 3.17 Effective


appropriate to use in an online
classroom for flexible learning.

5. I usually have a tendency to 2.40 Ineffective


take the initiative when it

Page 44
comes to duties and tasks that I
have to complete.

Average Weighted Mean 2.91 Effective

Table 11 exposed the weighted mean and verbal

interpretation of the effectiveness of online classrooms in

flexible learning in terms of Participation Level (PL).

Item 4 has the highest weighted mean among the five (5)

statements with 3.17 "Effective" which denotes

“Clarification sessions are appropriate to use in an online

classroom for flexible learning". On the other hand, Item 5

has the lowest weighted mean with 2.40 "Ineffective" and

states “I usually have a tendency to take the initiative

when it comes to duties and tasks that I have to complete".

which has a verbal interpretation of "Ineffective".

The overall weighted mean obtained 2.91 with a verbal

interpretation of “Effective”, which means, Participation

Level influences the effectiveness of online classrooms in

flexible learning as perceived by 4th year BSMA students.

The results showed that flexible learning is effective as

the respondents were actively engaged and participating in

the class in spite of having difficulties in this new

learning system. Also, it depicts that 4th year BSMA

Students were adaptive to the change of their learning mode.

Page 45
Although studies have shown that online courses can be

just as effective as in-person ones, this is only the case

if students are given carefully crafted opportunities for

social interaction (Hawkins, Graham, Sudweeks, & Barbour,

2013; Joksimovi, Gaevi, Kovanovi, Riecke, & Hatala, 2015;

Picciano, 2012). It is important to make online classrooms

where students can have meaningful conversations with each

other. Multiple studies have found that students who are

engaged in their online courses perform better and retain

more of what they have learned (Bettinger et al., 2016;

Goggins & Xing, 2016; Hrastinski, 2018; Stoessel et al.,

2015).

2.2. Critical Thinking (CT)

Table 12
Distribution of respondents according to the
Critical Thinking (CT)

Critical Thinking Weighted Verbal


Mean Interpretation

1. I believe that it is easier 2.44 Ineffective


to understand new ideas when
they are presented in an online
classroom for flexible
learning.

2. I believe that conducting 2.49 Ineffective


management accounting research
in an online classroom for
flexible learning is conducive
to a more interactive
experience.

Page 46
3. I believe that the 3.11 Effective
challenges in an online
classroom for flexible learning
in the BSMA subjects are tough.

4. I believe that student 3.02 Effective


activity sheets in an online
classroom for flexible learning
are difficult.

5. I believe that the 2.52 Effective


supplementary videos provided
by the instructor in an online
classroom for flexible learning
is something that I will have
no trouble understanding.

Average Weighted Mean 2.72 Effective

Table 12 presented the weighted mean and verbal

interpretation of the effectiveness of online classrooms in

flexible learning in terms of Critical Thinking (CT). Item 3

has the highest weighted mean with 3.11 "Effective" and

states "I believe that the challenges in an online classroom

for flexible learning in the BSMA subjects are tough”. On

the contrary, Item 1 has the lowest weighted mean with 2.44

"Ineffective" and denotes “I believe that it is easier to

understand new ideas when they are presented in an online

classroom for flexible learning”.

The overall weighted mean obtained 2.72 with a verbal

interpretation of “Effective”, which means, Critical

Thinking influences the effectiveness of online classrooms

in flexible learning as perceived by 4th year BSMA students.

Page 47
The findings revealed that the critical thinking skills of

4th year BSMA students were tested in this new learning

environment, and that the online assessments and activities

were difficult to answer as accounting and business subjects

require a deep comprehension of theories and calculations.

It simply means that 4th year BSMA Students were "Effective"

in their critical thinking that influenced the effectiveness

of online classrooms in flexible learning. They are having

difficulties in comprehending new concepts and incorporating

ideas inclined with their major subjects.

Two additional groups, learning resource challenges

(LRC) and learning environment challenges (LEC), were

created to broaden the scope of the categories established

by Rasheed et al. (2020) and account for additional

difficulties that may arise in online lectures (Recker et

al., 2004; Seplaki et al., 2014; Xue et al., 2020). In

contrast to the difficulties students have with library

resources and instructional materials (referred to as LRC),

those with their physical learning environment (referred to

as LEC) have an impact on their perspectives, assumptions,

and approaches to school. Including LRC and LEC would allow

us to capture other important challenges that students,

particularly those from developing regions, face during the

pandemic, as the quality of learning and the achievement of

Page 48
learning outcomes have been reported to be significantly

impacted by the learning environment at home and the

learning resources available to them (Drane et al., 2020;

Suryaman et al., 2020).

2.3. Creativity and Innovation (CI)

Table 13
Distribution of respondents according to the
Creativity and Innovation (CI)

Creativity and Innovation Weighted Verbal


Mean Interpretation

1. I believe that participating in 2.91 Effective


an online classroom for flexible
learning enhances my ability to
generate new ideas through methods
like brainstorming.

2. The idea of an online classroom 2.81 Effective


for flexible learning where I can
learn at my own pace motivates me
to create solutions to my
problems.

3. Online classroom helps me 2.83 Effective


improve my innovative skills in
creating my own studying hacks and
strategies.

4. I think an online classroom for 2.79 Effective


flexible learning helps me think
creatively in accomplishing the
designated tasks in our subjects.

5. I believe that online classroom 2.90 Effective


improves my creative side to deal
with real-life scenarios that
nurture their inner endeavor.

Page 49
Average Weighted Mean 2.85 Effective

Table 13 displayed the weighted mean and verbal

interpretation of the effectiveness in online classrooms in

flexible learning in terms of Creativity and Innovation

(CI). Item 1 has the highest weighted mean among five (5)

statements with 2.91 "Effective" which denotes “I believe

that participating in an online classroom for flexible

learning enhances my ability to generate new ideas through

methods like brainstorming”. In contrast to, Item 4 with

weighted mean of 2.79, “I think an online classroom for

flexible learning helps me think creatively in accomplishing

the designated tasks in our subjects” has the lowest

weighted mean.

The overall weighted mean obtained 2.85 with a verbal

interpretation of “Effective”, which means, Creativity and

Innovation (CI) influences the effectiveness of online

classrooms in flexible learning as perceived by 4th year

BSMA students. The results demonstrated that the creativity

and innovative skills of BSMA Students were enhanced in this

new learning system. 4th year BSMA students also believe

that their creativity was strengthened as a flexible

environment brought their own pace to discover themselves

Page 50
and to communicate their original ideas in an effective way

of learning.

In-class students were shown to be more extroverted and

agreeable, while online learners demonstrated more openness

to new experiences and higher levels of conscientiousness.

These findings are supported by Cohen and Baruth (2017),

Denphaisarry (2014, cited by Kim et al., 2018), Ramirez-

Corea et al. (2016), and Kim et al. (2018). Researchers

looked at online students and found that openness to

experience, conscientiousness, and agreeableness were the

best indicators of online student creativity.

2.4. Collaborative Skill (CS)

Table 14
Distribution of respondents according to the
Collaborative Skill (CS)

Collaborative Skills Weighted Verbal


Mean Interpretation

1. I believe that an online 2.74 Effective


classroom for flexible learning
offers many different
opportunities for working
together in groups.

2. I think it is easy to work in 2.51 Effective


groups in an online classroom for
flexible learning so that
students can learn in different
ways.

3. I believe that participating 2.81 Effective


in activities in an online
classroom for flexible learning

Page 51
helps improve my relationships
with my fellow students.

4. I think that having access to 2.82 Effective


an online classroom for flexible
learning makes my chances of
learning with others better.

5. I believe that it is simpler 2.78 Effective


to present our group projects and
reports in an online classroom
for flexible learning.

Average Weighted Mean 2.73 Effective

Table 14 flaunted the weighted mean and verbal

interpretation of effectiveness of online classrooms in

flexible learning in terms of Collaborative Skills (CS).

Item 4 has the highest weighted mean with 2.82 "Effective"

and states “I think that having access to an online

classroom for flexible learning makes my chances of learning

with others better”. Whereas, Item 2 has the lowest with

weighted mean of 2.51 "Effective" and denotes “I think it is

easy to work in groups in an online classroom for flexible

learning so that students can learn in different ways”.

The overall weighted mean obtained 2.73 with a verbal

interpretation of “Effective”, which means, Collaborative

Skill influences the effectiveness of online classrooms in

flexible learning as perceived by 4th year BSMA students.

The results showed that 4th year BSMA students feel more

comfortable doing group school works and presentations in

Page 52
this flexible learning. It infers that collaborative skills

of the students were improved in this new learning system as

they learn different learning styles and strategies and it

opens opportunities to interact with their classmates in an

online platform.

Technology advancements are laying a new groundwork for

online collaborative learning in academic institutions. The

flexibility of today's classrooms allows teachers to present

lessons in a variety of formats and encourages students to

engage with one another and the topic through online

discussion (Wang et al., 2020). There was also a significant

association between online collaborative learning and

students' feelings of belonging, which boosted

communication, collaboration, and dedication to shared goals

among class groups (Chatterjee and Correia, 2020). Tools for

asynchronous communication (such as blogs or instant

messengers), real-time communication (such as chat or video

conferencing), and shared document creation and editing

(such as wikis or cloud-based office suites) are all

examples of social media applications that facilitate

collaborative learning (Cavazos Olson et al., 2012, Mondahl

and Razmerita, 2014, Al-Samarraie and Saeed, 2018).

Students' motivation and how well they do in school are both

affected by how interactive their classrooms are. Ansari and

Page 53
Khan (2020) found that using social media for collaborative

learning made this interaction go up.

2.5. Technology Application (TA)

Table 15
Distribution of respondents according to the
Technology Application (TA)

Technology Application Weighted Verbal


Mean Interpretation

1. I find that utilizing 2.93 Effective


technology, especially in an
online classroom for flexible
learning, is fun and
entertaining.

2. I believe that time can be 3.11 Effective


saved through an online
classroom for flexible learning
when technology is utilized.

3. I have a strong sense of 2.85 Effective


self-assurance when it comes to
my ability in an online
classroom for flexible learning
while utilizing various new
applications and tools.

4. When the ideas are discussed 2.83 Effective


in conjunction with
technological advancements, I
find it much simpler to
comprehend.

5. Because of the ease with 2.93 Effective


which technology may be utilized
in an online classroom for
flexible learning, I feel
confident in my abilities as a
user of technology.

Average Weighted Mean 2.93 Effective

Page 54
Table 15 presented the weighted mean and verbal

interpretation of effectiveness of online classrooms in

flexible learning in terms of Technology Application (TA).

Item 2 with weighted mean of 3.11 "Effective" states “I

believe that time can be saved through an online classroom

for flexible learning when technology is utilized”.

Notwithstanding, Item 4 with weighted mean of 2.83

"Effective" and states “When the ideas are discussed in

conjunction with technological advancements, I find it much

simpler to comprehend.”

The overall weighted mean obtained 2.93 with a verbal

interpretation of “Effective”, which means, technology

application influences effectiveness of online classroom in

flexible learning as perceived by 4th year BSMA students.

The results revealed that application of technology

contributes to the learnings of BSMA Students. Flexible

learning also requires being digital literate that helps

them facilitate their learning environment and incorporate

strategies for more effective ways of studying.

Researchers from Drexel University's School of

Education argue that the widespread use of technology in

schools is crucial since it makes information readily

available to students. Devices such as laptops, desktop

computers, and tablets are already commonplace in today's

Page 55
classrooms. Users now have access to the internet as well as

the education they need to succeed in the 21st century

(Haider and Al-Salman,2020). Students will have access to a

wide variety of resources because of the advent of the

internet. Having access to a computer, tablet, or smartphone

makes it possible to study whenever and wherever it is most

convenient (Wallace, 2014; Hammonds et al., 2013; Manowong,

2016). Researchers led by Mustafa in 2015 found that

students were not bored when using the online education

platform Edmodo for school. Increased student engagement

leads to better learning outcomes (Cruz & Cruz, 2013 as

cited in Manowong, 2016), hence incorporating social media

into the classroom can be beneficial. The website encourages

students to connect with each other and gets in the way of

how they usually study.

3. Difficulties Students face in an online classroom during

flexible learning

Table 16
Difficulties students face in an online classroom during
flexible learning

Ranking Challenges in Online Classroom Frequency

7 System Glitch 105

5 Procrastination 108

Page 56
9 Lack of Motivation 98

2 Social Media Distraction 144

4 Poor Learning Environment 113

1 Electric Power Interruption 148

11 Some students are left behind 81

14 Lack of technological devices 63

3 Unstable Internet Connection 141

13 Lack of feedback in a timely manner 68

6 Unproductive and Inefficient Time 107


Management

4 Increased workload due to home and other 113


activities

12 Insufficient access to available 77


learning resources

10 Difficulty in adjusting to an online 93


learning style

8 Poor communication or lack of clear 100


directions from professors

The table above displayed the ranking based on the

challenges encountered in an online classroom using the

check option scale. Electric Power Interruption is ranked

first, with a total frequency of 148. Social media

distraction comes in second place, with 144. Unstable

Internet Connection is ranked third, with 141. With 113,

Poor Learning Environment and Increased workload due to home

and other activities tied for fourth place. Finally,

Procrastination ranked fifth with 108.

Page 57
1. Electric Power Interruption

It is no surprise that the students also mentioned

power outages as a difficulty in distance education. Online

classrooms always face the risk of power outages due to the

remote nature of the classroom (Castillo, 2020). This is the

case for a subset of surveyed students who live in places

where frequent power outages have been an issue even before

the pandemic. Multiple studies (e.g., Sarwar et al., 2020;

Subedi et al., 2020; and Verawardina et al., 2020) have

reached the same conclusion: students in extremely remote

locations have a hard time maintaining an online learning

connection due to frequent disruptions and sometimes a

complete lack of electricity. The problem of learning

material that is too generalized has also increased. They

claim the content, rather than the mechanism of

transmission, is to blame. In spite of the widespread

adoption of online education in higher education, many

instructors continue to rely on materials designed for

classroom use. Course outlines and modules may be provided

to students, but they may contain instructions that are

either too vague or too involved to be practical in an

online classroom.

As Chen et al. (2020) point out, this could be because

educators have less practice with online education and find

Page 58
it challenging to create supplemental materials that are

optimized for use in virtual classrooms.

2. Social Media Distraction

Singh (2021) claims that the rise in popularity of

social media is a major contributor to the rising tide of

mental distress and obstruction. These days, it is common

for students to become distracted from their studies and

instead spend their time scrolling through their feeds on

various social media platforms. This amounts to squandered

effort with no tangible payoff. In many cases, students'

preoccupation with social media prevents them from

completing assignments within the allotted time span. With

the proliferation of social media, today's students are less

likely to rely on traditional learning resources like books,

journals, and notes in favor of online sources. Because it

is so easy to find information online, students are losing

their reading habits, as well as their ability to learn and

do their own research.

3. Unstable Internet Connection

Similar to other studies (e.g., Bao, 2020; Henaku,

2020; Entsie, 2020; Wisconsin, 2020; and Baticulon et al.,

2020), participants in the study cited unreliable internet

connections as a major barrier to their participation in

distance education. A prevalent issue for countries with

Page 59
underdeveloped telecommunications infrastructure and

information and communication technologies is a weak network

(Aboagye et al., 2020). There are already a lot of different

internet plans available all over the country, but their

speeds and reliability vary a lot and can "fluctuate"

(Amadora, 2020).

4. Poor Learning Environment

Students' ability to successfully engage in distance

education is hindered by a subpar learning environment.

Student replies consistently highlight this challenge. The

challenge of creating a productive and comfortable study

environment has long plagued the field of distance

education, particularly in low-income families (Baticulon et

al., 2020). If this happens, students will not be able to

focus as hard on their work, which could affect their

academic success (Chang & Fang, 2020).

4. Increased workload due to home and other activities

The unexpected shift to distance education in the midst

of a health crisis has generated an unconducive learning

environment, which may have an impact on them. Several

students have also said that it is hard to find a balance

between their time spent learning at home and their other

responsibilities at home. Disruption of this sort is common

in distance education due to the fact that students still

Page 60
have responsibilities at home. Previous research (like

Poncian (2017) and Amali, Bello, and Adeoye (2018) has shown

that college students' involvement in family tasks hurts

their academic performance.

5. Procrastination

Gunn (2019) suggested that the reasons students

procrastinate can be broken down into a number of

categories, including but not limited to: lack of

motivation, low self-esteem, atychiphobia, difficulty

understanding, low energy levels, and poor organizational

abilities. Most of the time, students put off starting an

assignment because they either do not comprehend the topic,

do not know where to begin, or do not see how the project is

personally relevant or essential to them. Procrastination is

called "Mamaya na" in Filipino culture. It is not like this

sort of thing hasn't been an issue before. And that's why

things like this tend to spread quickly through generations.

Students who procrastinate are more likely to turn in half-

done work or miss critical submission dates, both of which

can negatively impact their grades. As a result,

procrastinators are more likely to have lower grade point

averages than other students. This is especially problematic

because some side effects can actually make students

procrastinate more.

Page 61
4. Significant relationship among age, and number of hours

during of online learning with the effectiveness of online

classrooms for flexible learning.

The relationship among age, and number of hours during

of online learning, and effectiveness of online classrooms

in flexible learning was analyzed using Pearson Correlation

Coefficient, thus was presented in tabular and discussed in

textual form.

Table 17

Relationship among age, and number of hours during of online


learning with the effectiveness of online classrooms for
flexible learning

Partici- Critical Creativity Collabo- Technology


pation Thinking and rative Application
Level Innovation Skill

Age Pearson 0.071 0.05 0.06 0.072 0.143


Correlation

Sig. (2- 0.347 0.509 0.431 0.342 0.059


tailed)

N 175 175 175 175 175


Number Pearson .195** 0.182** 0.093 0.022 .233**
of Correlation
hours
during

Sig. (2- 0.007 0.003 0.219 0.777 0.001


tailed)

N 175 175 175 175 175

**Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed)

Page 62
Legend: If the computed value is greater than critical value = accept.
Otherwise reject.

The table 18 showed the relationship among age, and

number of hours during of online learning with the

effectiveness of an online classroom for flexible learning.

Age does not have a significant relationship with the

effectiveness of online classrooms for flexible learning.

With a computed value of 0.195, 0.182, and 0.233 which

indicates that the three (3) out of five (5) variables have

a significant correlation to number of hours during online

learning namely participation level (PL), critical thinking

(CT), and technology application (TA) and the remaining two

(2), creativity and innovation (CI), and collaborative

skills (CS) do not have a significant correlation.

Therefore, the null hypothesis Number 1 was accepted.

Which states "There is no significant relationship among

age, and number of hours during of online learning with the

effectiveness of online classroom for flexible learning".

According to a study by Skinner and Belmont (2013), a

teacher's actions not only affect how students view their

interactions with that teacher but also how actively they

participate in class. For students to grasp new material, it

must be demonstrated to them. Here, the novel content serves

as an incentive for students to participate in lectures.

Teachers may be able to fulfill this new role by shifting

Page 63
their interactions with students from inside the classroom

to the outside world, where the kids are more likely to feel

at ease. The internet is a place where many students feel at

home, and this has an impact on how many hours they spend

there each week doing homework. For the sake of this

analysis, "virtual office hours" refers to a professor's

scheduled availability during which time he or she can be

contacted online for individual or group consultations. The

goal of this online space is to provide students with more

opportunities to communicate with their instructors in a

setting where they are more likely to be safe. Consequently,

some students may opt to engage with the instructor in

accordance with the instructor's expectations for the total

amount of time spent online each week.

The results of this study lend credence to the idea

that online classes might be an effective venue for

imparting moral principles and encouraging the kind of

critical thinking that is essential for solving problems of

a practical kind. Because of their active participation in

the university's LMS platform, students had a great chance

to have access to all relevant learning materials. The

millennial generation is also more equipped to examine

ethical business situations because of its preference for

acquiring knowledge from virtual sources at the student's

Page 64
own pace, which includes attending virtual classes at their

own discretion over a set schedule, specifically the number

of hours during in an online learning class. Students can

have access to and use assessment criteria, develop

cognitive and practical skills in accordance with their

ability, and participate actively in the learning process

with the support of virtual communication. In particular,

the results of ethical case studies can be utilized to gauge

students' ability to think critically about course material

in the context of their own values and beliefs within the

time constraints of online education. For today's accounting

students, researching online opens up a wealth of

opportunities to hone their critical thinking abilities and

cement their understanding of the importance of ethical

behavior in business (Mobasher M., 2020).

The extent to which online and flexible learning is

implemented is strongly influenced by the types and

quantities of web-based tools used by both students and

instructors, including learning management systems,

applications, learning and teaching resources, and the total

number of hours during spent on study (Biundo, 2017).

According to Biundo and Wendemuth (2017), a "companion

technology" is a "cognitive technological system" that

prioritizes user skills and knowledge, ease of use,

Page 65
accessibility, security, teamwork, trust, and adaptability

in the context of technology-human interaction. Researchers

used HTI (Human-Technology Interaction) to find out how well

students used digital platforms online and offline to learn

and get study materials.

5. Significant difference of Sex, Internet Service

Connection, and Online Learning Environment with Online

Classroom for Flexible Learning

The significant difference among sex, internet service

connection, and online learning environment and

effectiveness of online classrooms in flexible learning was

analyzed using ANOVA, thus was presented in tabular and

discussed in textual form.

Table 18
Difference of Sex, Internet Service Connection, and Online
Learning Environment with Online Classroom for Flexible
Learning

Sum of df Mean F Sig. Decision


Square Squar
e

Sex Between 15.417 87 0.177 1.528 0.075* There is no


Groups significant
difference

Within 10.092 87 0.116


Groups

Total 25.509 174

Internet Between 149.53 87 1.719 0.78 0.026** There is a


Service Groups significant

Page 66
Connec- difference
tion

Within 191.75 87 2.204


Groups

Total 341.28 174

Online Between 24.179 87 0.278 1.256 0.045** There is a


Learning Groups significant
Environ- difference
ment

Within 19.25 87 0.221


Groups

Total 43.429 174


More than 0.05 = There is no significant difference
Less than 0.05 = There is a significant difference

The analysis of variance revealed that there is no

significant difference in sex, with a p-value of 0.075 more

than 0.05. This indicates the usefulness of the online

classroom for flexible learning. There is a substantial

difference between the internet service connection and the

online learning environment, with p-values of 0.026 and

0.045, respectively.

Therefore, the null hypothesis No. 2 was rejected which

states "There is no signifant difference among sex, internet

service connection, and online learning environment with

online classroom for flexible leaarning".

Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, there has been an

increase in the number of online students from a wide range

of racial, ethnic, religious, and socioeconomic backgrounds.

Several research (Gaevi et al., 2016) have looked into

Page 67
whether or not the demographic backgrounds of students have

an impact on their performance in online courses. Numerous

researchers have looked at how factors such as gender and

educational background affect online learning success (e.g.,

Boyte-Eckis et al., 2018; Cai et al., 2017; Diep et al.,

2016). However, the effect of gender on online learning

outcomes is debatable, although educational background can

be a strong predictor of success in virtual classrooms

(Huang & Fang, 2013). Women were found to be more dedicated

to their education, allowing them to outperform men in terms

of learning results. The greater capacity for self-

regulation displayed by females correlated with their much

better online learning outcomes than those of males

(Alghamdi et al., 2020). Males were more consistent in their

views, while women excelled in their levels of engagement,

but this did not translate to any statistically significant

differences in voting results (Nistor, 2013). Finally, there

were no discernible variations in performance across

learning modes between the sexes. There were no significant

variations in the effectiveness of online learning between

male and female millennial online learners (Harvey et al.,

2017).

A possible problem in an online delivery setting is

that students who do not live on or close to campus may have

Page 68
less convenient access to digital learning resources than

students who do (Raes et al., 2019). Several variables, such

as a lack of access to a laptop or desktop PC, an acceptable

learning/study environment at home, or the digital literacy

skills necessary to participate in online learning, may

contribute to this divide (Silva et al., 2018). It is also

possible that the quality of students' home internet

connections differs significantly from that of their campus

connections, which is a major factor in this gap (Rasheed et

al., 2020). Since many universities' service regions

encompass both urban and rural locations, disparities in

internet access may force instructors to modify their

methods for teaching online or in a hybrid format, or

prevent some students from fully utilizing these resources.

Therefore, this article takes into account the fact that

college students in Ireland may be at danger of having low-

quality internet connectivity options available to them

because of inadequate broadband coverage. There has been a

dramatic increase in the number of students enrolling in

online higher education programs around the world in recent

years due to the convenience it provides in terms of both

time and location compared to more traditional forms of

higher education (Panigrahi et al. 2018). However, before

the pandemic, face-to-face delivery was the primary method

Page 69
of interacting with students. Nonetheless, worries remained

about the availability of high-speed Internet. Gonzales et

al. (2018), for instance, found that among US college

students, 20% reported experiencing difficulties with

retaining access to computers. Recent events, such as the

widespread closure of campus facilities and the quick shift

to emergency online delivery, have brought the problem into

sharp view. Since student engagement is associated with

better academic outcomes and higher levels of satisfaction,

especially among first-year students and in online learning

environments, the issue of potential differences in the

quality or type of delivery students may receive in the

current context due to unequal broadband access arises

(Kahu, 2013; Kahu et al., 2020; Paulsen & McCormick, 2020).

When Naffi et al. (2020) looked at survey data from 78

educational institutions across 23 countries in the spring

of 2020, they discovered that students' lack of access to

adequate bandwidth hampered a number of aspects of their

education, including file sharing and synchronous

classrooms. Student survey data from the United Kingdom

corroborated the findings of these research, showing that 7%

of students overall and 12% of students from low-income

families have inadequate access to the internet (Montacute &

Holt-White, 2020). A different poll indicated that 56% of

Page 70
students felt their grades took a "seriously negative" turn

due to a lack of access to adequate online course resources

(Office for Students, 2020). Two-and-a-half percent of

third-year students in Ireland, the study's setting, said

that having access to stable Wi-Fi was crucial to improving

their future online-learning experiences in March 2020.

(Union of Students in Ireland, 2020). Recent student

surveys, in combination with prior scholarly work, serve to

inspire the study's central research question.

Hendrix (2019) said that it has been established

through studies that different environmental settings

significantly affect students' academic outcomes.

Environmental conditions such as layout, lighting,

background noise, and even wall color can all have a

significant impact on students' ability to absorb new

information. Evidence suggests that students who study in an

encouraging setting have greater motivation, interest, and

aptitude for learning. On the other hand, it is much harder

for students to learn and stay interested in classes where

they are uncomfortable, there is a lot of background noise,

or there are a lot of other things going on.

Page 71
6. Proposed Action of Plans and Activities based on the findings of study

Table 19
Proposed Action Plan and Activities based on the findings

Areas of Plan/Activities/ Time Expected


Concern Strategies Frame Outcome

Electric ● Collaboration with electric As early ● Being aware of schedules can


Power cooperatives (such as NEECO, CELCOR, as now/ minimize its setbacks.
Interruption and AURELCO, amongst others). as when
● Making sure that the electronic needed ● Serve as backup power sources
devices are fully charged. ready to be used during the
session.
● Giving consideration to students. ● Students have enough time to
complete the task given (if
there is a valid reason to do
● Educating students by becoming so).
more proactive rather than reactive. ● Students will be better
prepared because of their
initiative.

Social ● Having a responsible mind, keeping As early ● Helps to keep their attention
Media phones out of their learning area. as now/ on the course instructions.
Distraction ● They could install a social media as when ● Accessing browser extensions,
blocker. needed to prevent any social media site
from loading.
● Be a well-disciplined student by ● A way to refocus after being
turning off all alerts on their distracted by social media.
devices.
●Establishing a regular time for ● Students will learn to refrain

Page 72
checking social media. from mindlessly scanning their
feed by having defined time.

Unstable ● Let the professors know the As early ● Professors can choose the most
Internet hurdles you are dealing with. as now/ convenient time for students.
Connection ● Students should look for hotspots as when ● It will be a safety net in
but not rely solely on them. needed case their online class is
disrupted.
● Regularly check the students by ● Keeping lines of communication
posting a simple question on Google open with professors that help
Classroom. students feel less worried and
for the professors to monitor
the students.
● Plain text instructions are ● More accessible to plain text
recommended. content rather than uploading a
pdf or image file as it is
easier to access.
● Materials should be posted on the ● It allows students to get a
Google Classroom or group chat 2- head start on their work and
3days before the actual subject ensures that they fully grasp
schedule. the subject.

Poor ●Communicating with local As early ● It will improve concentration


Learning authorities, such as barangay as now/ for students and make it easier
Environment officials, to establish regulations as when to hear teachers clearly.
regarding a noisy and distracting needed
environment.
● Students can propose initiatives ● Creating a small library or
to their barangay or to LGUs. common study room for college
students.
● Professors should regularly assess ● It is a helpful space in every

Page 73
the classroom atmosphere and discuss community for college students
any concerns they may have. in this era of online classes.

Increased ● Professors should not just mark As early ● To optimize the online
workload due assignments and activities as as now/ classroom, homework and
to home and complete or incomplete. as when activities should be
other ● They should only utilize Google needed implemented.
activities Classroom within their authorized ● Students must not become too
time and let their classes know if focused on schoolwork so they
they will be absent or can't can pursue other interests.
participate.
● Students should use every minute
in class. ● It will help them develop
personal accountability and
● They should read or study before improve their education.
class. ● They will be able to
prioritize their note-taking by
recognizing the most important
● Students must be confident in information.
their abilities.
● It helps them make sense of
●Students and professors' homework the lectures and the material
and activity goals should be similar covered inside.
(that is, students should be able to ● They will have an easier time
identify the purpose). separating the relevant from
● Teachers and students should irrelevant information.
collaborate on homework and
activities. ● They are better able to see
how their understanding of a
topic might be developed
further.

Page 74
Procrastina- ● Students should develop As early ● They will value their innate
tion metacognitive skills such as time as now/ intelligence and put it to good
management and knowing when they as when use.
need help. needed
● They must be organized since chaos ● They can prioritize and set
delays work. due dates for their work.
● Encourage students, especially ● It will boost their morale,
those who are down. abilities, and confidence.
●Overly critical or negative ● It is best to avoid being
comments should be avoided. overly specific about the errors
that need to be fixed.
● Teachers should provide a good ● It is better to provide
instructional example. written instructions so students
can refer to them when needed,
but teachers should make sure
all students know the objectives
and requirements. Students can
better comprehend their tasks by
looking at past work.

Page 75
CHAPTER IV

SUMMARY OF FINDINGS, CONCLUSION, and RECOMMENDATIONS

This chapter aims to answer the specific questions

raised in Chapter I by summarizing the outcomes. This

section advocates for more effective ways to pilot the

research. Additionally, it presents the summary of findings,

conclusions and recommendations of the study entitled

“Effectiveness of an Online Classrooms for Flexible Learning

of 4th year BSMA Students at PHINMA-Araullo University”.

Summary of Findings

This study was conducted for the purpose of determining

the specific factor that influences the effectiveness of

online classrooms in flexible learning of 4th BSMA students

at PHINMA-Araullo University. Quantitative type of research

was utilized and the survey-questionnaire was used for

gathering data from a hundred and seventy-five (175)

respondents.

The summary of findings were as follows:

1. Profile of the Respondents

1.1. Age

The data implies that the majority of the respondents

were at the age of 21. The usual age of college students

from fourth year drops between 19-22 years old.

Page 76
1.2. Sex

The data infers that the majority of the respondents

were female. This means that the majority of the 4th year

BSMA students who enrolled at PHINMA Araullo University in

the 1st semester of school year 2022-2023 were mostly

female. Females are more inclined in the BSMA course.

1.3. Number of hours during Studying

The data entails that the majority of the respondents

were studying for 5 hours. This suggests that BSMA students

consider it effective to study in average time, which helps

them focus better, remember a greater proportion of what

they studied, and will also be less likely to procrastinate

or get bored due to the long-time blocks of studying.

1.4. Internet Service Connection

This means that most BSMA fourth-years at PHINMA

Araullo University used wifi (unlimited) during the first

semester of the 2022–2023 academic year. This means that

they will have easier access to a wider variety of tools and

sources.

1.5. Online Learning Environment

The majority of respondents appear to have been exposed

to a noisy and distracting environment, as indicated by the

data. Because of this, most students are likely to find it

easy to get distracted from their studies and unable to

Page 77
concentrate during an online classroom for flexible

learning.

2. Effectiveness of an online classroom for flexible

learning of 4th-year BSMA students on the insights of the

respondents in terms of:

2.1 Participation Level (PL)

Based on the findings, Participation Level (PL)

obtained an overall weighted mean of 2.91 with a verbal

interpretation of “Effective”, which means, Participation

Level influences the effectiveness of online classrooms in

flexible learning as perceived by 4th year BSMA students.

Therefore, flexible learning is effective as the respondents

were actively engaged and participating in the class.

2.2 Critical Thinking (CT)

As a result of the information, Critical Thinking (PL)

gathered an overall weighted mean of 2.72 with a verbal

interpretation of “Effective”, which means, Critical

Thinking influences the effectiveness of online classrooms

in flexible learning as perceived by 4th BSMA students.

2.3 Creativity and Innovation (CI)

Based on the discoveries, Creativity and Innovation

(CI) obtained an overall weighted mean of 2.85 with a verbal

interpretation of “Effective”, which means, Creativity and

Page 78
Innovation influences the effectiveness of online classrooms

in flexible learning as perceived by 4th BSMA students.

2.4 Collaborative Skill (CS)

In light of what has been discovered, Collaborative

Skill (CS) gathered an overall weighted mean of 2.73 with a

verbal interpretation of “Effective”, which means,

Collaborative Skill influences the effectiveness of online

classrooms in flexible learning as perceived by 4th BSMA

students.

2.5 Technology Application (TA)

As a result of findings, Technology Application (TA)

obtained an overall weighted mean of 2.93 with a verbal

interpretation of “Effective”, which means, Technology

Application influences the effectiveness of online

classrooms in flexible learning as perceived by 4th BSMA

students.

In summary, technology application is the most

significant of the five factors influencing the

effectiveness of online classrooms for flexible learning,

with a weighted mean average of 2.93, while critical

thinking is the lowest weighted mean of 2.72.

3. The challenges students encountered in an online

classroom during flexible learning

Page 79
The findings of this study have shown that Electric

Power Interruption is ranked first using the check option

scale, with a total frequency of 148. Followed by, social

media distraction, with 144 responses. Next is Unstable

Internet Connection, with 141. For the fourth place, Poor

Learning Environment and Increased workload due to home and

other activities tied, with 113. Finally, Procrastination

ranked fifth with 108.

4. Relationship among age, and number of hours during of

online learning with the effectiveness of online classrooms

for flexible learning

Age is not significant in determining the

effectiveness of an online classroom. In all five factors

influencing the effectiveness of online classrooms, three

(3) of them namely: participation level (PL), critical

thinking (CT), and technology application (TA) are

significant with online classrooms for flexible learning and

the remaining two (2) which are creativity and innovation

(CI), and collaborative skills (CS) are not significant.

Therefore, the null hypothesis was accepted.

5. Differences of Sex, Internet Service Connection, and

Online Learning Environment with Online Classroom for

Flexible Learning

Page 80
The findings revealed that sex makes no difference in

the effectiveness of an online classroom for flexible

learning. While there are significant differences between

internet service connections, and online learning

environments. Because of this, the null hypothesis is

rejected.

Conclusion

In light of the study's findings, the following

conclusions were made:

1. Overall, the fourth year 175-BSMA Students of PHINMA-

Araullo University were mostly 21 years old, dominated

by females, assigned 5 hours of studying online, used

unlimited wifi to have a better access to resources,

and most of them had a noisy and distracting kind of

learning environment.

2. In general, Participation Level, Critical Thinking,

Creativity and Innovation, Collaborative Skills and

Technology Application have an influence on the

effectiveness of online learning for flexible learning

as perceived by the research respondents. This

indicates that the online classroom is effective in the

implementation of a flexible learning approach.

Page 81
3. Generally speaking, difficulties students face was

ranked based on the findings. The results showed the

challenges that students struggle with in an online

classroom. On top of it was electric power

interruption, followed by social media distraction,

next is unstable internet connection, then poor

learning environment, and increased workload due to

home and other activities, and lastly, procrastination.

4. There is no significant relationship between age and

the effectiveness of online classrooms,

notwithstanding, there is a significant relationship

among the number of hours during in online learning

with the effectiveness of online classrooms in relation

with the three (3) factors namely: Participation

Level(PL), Critical Thinking(CT) and Technology

Application(TA). Therefore, the first null hypothesis

is accepted.

5. There is a substantial difference between the internet

service connection and online learning environment with

the online classrooms for flexible learning as shown in

the statistical computation that the p-values were less

than 0.05. However, this also revealed that there is no

significant difference between age and online classroom

Page 82
for flexible learning. For majority findings, the

second null hypothesis is rejected.

6. At the end of this research study, the researchers will

be providing such proposed action plans and activities

based on the findings of study. The researchers

identified areas of concern based on the ranking of

challenges students encountered, the time frame that

the said activities will be executed and the expected

outcomes that will be beneficial to each and every

learner, teachers, parents, educational institutions

and any other aspects.

Recommendations

In view of the findings of the study, and the

conclusion drawn, the researchers commend numbers of

recommendations. The proposed actions and activities made by

the researchers in regards to the five (5) major

difficulties that students faced while participating in an

online classroom for flexible learning:

1. The researchers suggested a variety of electric

cooperatives (including NEECO, CELCOR, and AURELCO)

should work together with educational institutions; the

battery life of student electronics should always be

checked; the due dates for activities and other

Page 83
requirements should be extended by professors (if there

is a valid reason to do so); and if there is a power

outage, professors should give their students the tools

they need to figure out their own responsibilities and

outcomes. This way, students can take charge of their

own education and make the most of the time they have

while still being able to learn.

2. The researchers had proposed removing themselves from

any potential interruptions while online. Students

should put their phones away and stay in class until

they have finished all of their assigned work; they

could set up some sort of social media filtering

system; they can disable all notifications to avoid

being interrupted by social media; and they should set

aside time each day to monitor their social media

accounts.

3. The researcher recommended that students should notify

their instructors if they are having trouble

connecting; students should actively seek out hotspots,

but they should not rely on them exclusively;

professors should either check in with their students

from time to time to make sure they can get online or

post this information on Google Classroom; it is

advised that directions be presented in plain text; and

Page 84
two or three days ahead of the start of class,

materials should be made available in Google Classroom

or via group chat.

4. The researcher advised the students to work with local

authorities, such as barangay officials, to develop

rules for a less distracting and louder atmosphere. The

presence of stray animals and the careless use of

loudspeakers and videoke are examples of this; students

have the option of submitting proposals to their

barangay that would establish a study space or small

library for the community. They need to talk to the

Sangguniang Kabataan (SK) officials and ask them;

professors should take stock of the mood in their

classes on a frequent basis and air any issues they

have with their students. Consideration must be given

to the learners' feelings, ideas, and future needs.

5. The researchers advised that instructors should not

just check off whether or not a student has finished an

activity or assignment; educators should limit their

use of Google Classroom to scheduled class time and

provide students with advance notice if they will be

absent or unable to participate; students need to make

the most of their time in class; they should prepare

for class by reading or studying the materials in

Page 85
advance; they should be able to say with certainty that

they have grasped the material; there should be no

discrepancy between what students and teachers say

their homework and activities are meant to accomplish

(that is, students should be able to identify the

purpose); and the best homework and class activities

are the result of close collaboration between teachers

and their students.

6. The researchers advocated the importance of students

developing meta cognitive skills like time management

and the ability to recognize when they need extra

support; they should be well-organized because disorder

is one of the most common reasons people put off doing

their tasks; educators have a responsibility to boost

the spirits of their students, particularly those who

may be having a low self-esteem day; professors should

not be too critical or hostile in class discussions so

they don't make students feel bad; and they should set

a positive example in the classroom.

Page 86
APPENDICES

QUESTIONNAIRE

PART I - PROFILE OF THE RESPONDENTS

Directions: Put a check (/) mark in the box provided in


each item which corresponds to your answer. For others,
please write what is needed.

Name of the Respondent (Optional): ________________________

Age: □ 19 □ 20 □ 21 □ 22
Others (please specify): ________

Sex: □ Male □ Female

Number of hours during Online Learning (per day):


□ 4 hours □ 5 hours □ 6 hours □ 7 hours □ 8
hours and above

Internet Service Connection (select one only):


□ Mobile Networks/Data
□ Broadband
□ Wifi (Limited)
□ Wifi (Unlimited)

Page 87
Online Learning Environment: □ Quiet and Encouraging
Environment
□ Noisy and Distracting
Environment

PART II: THE FACTORS INFLUENCING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF AN


ONLINE CLASSROOM FOR FLEXIBLE LEARNING OF 4TH YEAR BSMA
STUDENTS AT PHINMA ARAULLO UNIVERSITY IN TERMS OF
PARTICIPATION LEVEL, CRITICAL THINKING, CREATIVITY AND
INNOVATION, COLLABORATIVE SKILLS, AND TECHNOLOGY
APPLICATION”

Direction: Put a check (/) mark in the box provided in each


item which corresponds to your answer. Use the following
rating scale:

4 - Strongly Agree
3 - Agree
2 - Disagree
1 - Strongly Disagree

PARTICIPATION LEVEL 4 3 2 1
(SA) (A) (D) (SD)

1. I often contribute to a learning


opportunity that is held in an online
classroom for flexible learning.

2. As a result of my schedule, I make


greater use of online classrooms for
flexible learning to supplement my
education.

3. I actively check the online classroom


to engage with student-teacher
interaction for flexible learning.

4. Clarification sessions are appropriate


to use in an online classroom for
flexible learning.

5. I usually have a tendency to take the


initiative when it comes to duties and
tasks that I have to complete.

Page 88
CRITICAL THINKING 4 3 2 1
(SA) (A) (D) (SD)

1. I believe that it is easier to


understand new ideas when they are
presented in an online classroom for
flexible learning.

2. I believe that conducting management


accounting research in an online classroom
for flexible learning is conducive to a
more interactive experience.

3. I believe that the challenges in an


online classroom for flexible learning in
the BSMA subjects are tough.

4. I believe that student activity sheets


in an online classroom for flexible
learning are difficult.

5. I believe that the supplementary videos


provided by the instructor in an online
classroom for flexible learning is
something that I will have no trouble
understanding.

CREATIVITY AND INNOVATION 4 3 2 1


(SA) (A) (D) (SD)

1. I believe that participating in an


online classroom for flexible learning
enhances my ability to generate new ideas
through methods like brainstorming.

2. The idea of an online classroom for


flexible learning where I can learn at my
own pace motivates me to create solutions
to my problems.

3. Online classroom helps me improve my


innovative skills in creating my own
studying hacks and strategies.

4. I think an online classroom for


flexible learning helps me think

Page 89
creatively in accomplishing the designated
tasks in our subjects.

5. I believe that online classroom


improves my creative side to deal with
real-life scenarios that nurture their
inner endeavor.

COLLABORATIVE SKILLS 4 3 2 1
(SA) (A) (D) (SD)

1. I believe that an online classroom for


flexible learning offers many different
opportunities for working together in
groups.

2. I think it is easy to work in groups in


an online classroom for flexible learning
so that students can learn in different
ways.

3. I believe that participating in


activities in an online classroom for
flexible learning helps improve my
relationships with my fellow students.

4. I think that having access to an online


classroom for flexible learning makes my
chances of learning with others better.

5. I believe that it is simpler to present


our group projects and reports in an
online classroom for flexible learning.

TECHNOLOGY APPLICATION 4 3 2 1
(SA) (A) (D) (SD)

1. I find that utilizing technology,


especially in an online classroom for
flexible learning, is fun and
entertaining.

2. I believe that time can be saved


through an online classroom for flexible

Page 90
learning when technology is utilized.

3. I have a strong sense of self-assurance


when it comes to my ability in an online
classroom for flexible learning while
utilizing various new applications and
tools.

4. When the ideas are discussed in


conjunction with technological
advancements, I find it much simpler to
comprehend.

5. Because of the ease with which


technology may be utilized in an online
classroom for flexible learning, I feel
confident in my abilities as a user of
technology.

3. What are the challenges students encountered in an online


classroom during flexible learning? (Check as many as apply)
□ System Glitch
□ Procrastination
□ Lack of Motivation
□ Social media distraction
□ Poor Learning Environment
□ Electric Power Interruption
□ Some students are left behind
□ Lack of technological devices
□ Unstable Internet Connectivity
□ Lack of feedback in a timely manner
□ Unproductive and Inefficient Time Management

Page 91
□ Increased workload due to home and other activities
□ Insufficient access to available learning resources
□ Difficulty in adjusting to an online learning style
□ Poor communication or lack of clear directions from
professors

Letter to the Registrar


ROBERTO R. OCAMPO
University Registrar
PHINMA-Araullo University

Dear Sir:

Greetings of Peace and Wisdom!

We, the undersigned 4th Year BSMA Students of PHINMA-Araullo


University Main Campus will conduct our study entitled
“Effectiveness of an Online Classroom for Flexible Learning of
Fourth-Year BSMA Students at PHINMA-Araullo University”. The goal
of this study is to is to find out if and how online
classrooms for flexible learning could be a valuable tool
for education in times of difficulties and how this study
could help students evaluate their situations in terms of
challenges they may face, enhancing their independence and
ability to adapt.
In connection to this, we would like to request in your good
office a list of 4th Year BSMA enrolled students this S.Y 2022-

Page 92
2023. They will serve as the primary respondents in this research
study. 
We are looking forward to this matter. Hope for your most
beautiful response.

Thank you and Godbless!

Respectfully yours,

Ramelyn T. Andres Rica Jane U. Duran Leslie L. Granil

Wency Mae Q. Guelas Jasmine H. Hilario Maureen M. Marcelo

Patricia R. Medrano Mia May M. Meradios Pamela Ann B. Miranda

Marigold C. Niedo Desserie S. Santiago Ckaren Kaizia G. Valdez

Eloisa M. Vino
RESEARCHERS
Manuel Castillo
Research Adviser
Letter to Conduct

AEMEE JOY C. IGNACIO


CMA Program Head
PHINMA-Araullo University

Ma’am:

This is to respectfully request your permission to conduct


study to the 4th Year BSMA Students of PHINMA-Araullo University
in relation to our study entitled: Effectiveness of an Online
Classroom for Flexible Learning of Fourth-Year BSMA Students at
PHINMA-Araullo University.
The proposal has been approved and endorsed by the thesis
committee of the College of Management and Accountancy of PHINMA
Araullo University Cabanatuan City as partial fulfillment of the
requirements for the subject Management Accounting Research (ACC
152).

Thank you for your kind consideration of this request.

Page 93
Respectfully yours,

Ramelyn T. Andres Rica Jane U. Duran Leslie L. Granil

Wency Mae Q. Guelas Jasmine H. Hilario Maureen M. Marcelo

Patricia R. Medrano Mia May M. Meradios Pamela Ann B. Miranda

Marigold C. Niedo Desserie S. Santiago Ckaren Kaizia G. Valdez

Eloisa M. Vino
RESEARCHERS

Letter to the Respondents


Dear Respondents:

Greetings!

We, students from BSMA4-MAIN5, are conducting a study


entitled "Effectiveness of an Online Classroom for Flexible
Learning of Fourth-Year BSMA Students at PHINMA-Araullo
University." This questionnaire is intended to collect data about
students' demographic profile, factors influencing the
effectiveness of online classroom for flexible learning of 4th
year BSMA students in terms of participation level (PL), critical
thinking (CT), creativity and innovation (CI), collaborative
skills (CS), and technology application (TA), and the
challenges/difficulties students faced in an online classroom for
flexible learning. Your participation in this study by way of
answering this questionnaire is very vital. Without it, the study
will not be completed as it should be. Kindly answer the
questions honestly. Rest assured that the data which will be
gathered will be treated with fairness and confidentiality. 

Page 94
Thank you very much for your participation. Godbless!

Sincerely:

Ramelyn T. Andres Rica Jane U. Duran Leslie L. Granil

Wency Mae Q. Guelas Jasmine H. Hilario Maureen M. Marcelo

Patricia R. Medrano Mia May M. Meradios Pamela Ann B. Miranda

Marigold C. Niedo Desserie S. Santiago Ckaren Kaizia G. Valdez

Eloisa M. Vino
RESEARCHERS

Manuel Castillo
Research Adviser

Page 95
STATISTICAL COMPUTATION

Page 96
Page 97
DOCUMENTATION

This survey was conducted on the 15th and 16th day of August.

Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
REFERENCES:

A. BOOKS/JOURNALS
Alraimi, K. M., Zo, H., & Ciganek, A. P. (2015). Understanding
the MOOCs continuance: The role of openness and reputation.
Computers & Education, 80, 28–38.

Bradley, R. L., Browne, B. L., & Kelley, H. M. (2017). Examining


the influence of self-efficacy and self-regulation in online
learning. College Student Journal, 51(4), 518–530.

Breslow, L., Pritchard, D. E., DeBoer, J., Stump, G. S., Ho, A.


D., & Seaton, D. T. (2013). Studying learning in the worldwide
classroom research into edX’s first MOOC. Research & Practice in
Assessment, 8, 13–25.

Hawkins, A., Graham, C. R., Sudweeks, R. R., & Barbour, M. K.


(2013). Academic performance, course completion rates, and
student perception of the quality and frequency of interaction in
a virtual high school. Distance Education, 34(1), 64-83.

Haider, A. S., and Al-Salman, S. (2020). Dataset of Jordanian


university students’ psychological health impacted by using E-
learning tools during COVID-19.

Manowong, S. (2016). Undergraduate students' perceptions of


Edmodo as a supplementary learning tool in an EFL classroom.
Silpakorn University Journal of Social Sciences, Humanities, and
Arts, 16(2), 137–161

Mustafa, M. B. (2015). One size does not fit all: Students’


perceptions about Edmodo at Al Ain University of Science &
Technology.
Journal of Studies in Social Sciences, 13(2),135–160.

Mwalongo, A.I. Using activity theory to understand student


teacher perceptions of effective ways for promoting critical
thinking through asynchronous discussion forums.

In Activity Theory in Education: Research and Practice; Dilani,


S., Gedera, P., Williams, P.J., Eds.; Sense Publishers:
Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 2016; pp. 19–34

Montacute, R. & Holt-White, E. (2020). COVID-19 and social


mobility impact brief: University access and finance. Sutton
Trust Research Brief, Sutton Trust.

Salleh, S. M., Tasir, Z., & Shukor, N. A. (2012). Web-Based


Simulation Learning Framework to Enhance Students’ Critical
Thinking Skills. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 64,
372-381.

Page 106
B. WEB SOURCES

Abedini, Y., (2020). Students’ Creativity in Virtual vs.


Classroom Courses on the Basis of Their Personality
Traits: A Prediction Study.
Available online:
https://www.google.com/url?
sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://files.eric.ed.gov/
fulltext/
EJ1276319.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwiw3q3G49n5AhX1plYBHaBEDE8QFnoECBMQA
Q&usg=AOvVaw1iuGk2hJrfGqim4MZCFweA

Alghamdi, A., Karpinski, A. C., Lepp, A., & Barkley, J.


(2020). Online and face-to-face classroom multitasking and
academic performance: Moderated mediation with self-efficacy
for self-regulated learning and gender. Computers in Human
Behavior, 102, 214–222.
Available online:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.08.018

Ansari, L.A. N., & Khan, N. A. (2020), "Exploring the role


of social media in collaborative learning the new domain of
learning", Smart Learning Environments, 7(1), 1-16
Available online:
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/352888884_How_Onlin
e_Collaborative_Learning_leads_to_improved_Online_Learning_E
xperience_in_Higher_Education

Bettinger, E., Liu, J., & Loeb, S. (2016). Connections


matter: How interactive peers affect students in
online college courses. Journal of Policy Analysis and
Management, 35(4), 932-954.
Available online:
doi:10.1002/pam.21932

Biundo, S.; Wendemuth,(2017) A. An introduction to companion


technology. In Companion Technology, Cognitive Technologies;
Biundo, S., Wendemuth, A., Eds.; Springer:
Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2017; pp. 1–15
Available online:
https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-43665-
4_1

Boyte-Eckis, L., Minadeo, D. F., Bailey, S. S., & Bailey, W.


C. (2018). Age, gender, and race as predictors of opting for
a midterm retest: A statistical analysis of online economics
students. The Journal of Business Diversity, 18(1), 17–28.

Page 107
Available online:
https://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Age%2C
%20gender%2C%20and%20race%20as%20predictors%20of%20opting
%20for%20a%20midterm%20retest%3A%20A%20statistical
%20analysis%20of%20online%20economics%20students&journal=The
%20Journal%20of%20Business
%20Diversity&volume=18&issue=1&pages=17-
28&publication_year=2018&author=Boyte-Eckis
%2CL&author=Minadeo%2CDF&author=Bailey%2CSS&author=Bailey
%2CWC#d=gs_qabs&t=1663736866310&u=%23p%3D6lsq0UhQ9V4J

Cai, Z., Fan, X., & Du, J. (2017). Gender and attitudes
toward technology use: A meta-analysis. Computers &
Education, 105, 1–13.
Available online:
https://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Gender%20and
%20attitudes%20toward%20technology%20use%3A%20A%20meta-
analysis&journal=Computers
%20%26%20Education&volume=105&pages=1-
13&publication_year=2017&author=Cai%2CZ&author=Fan
%2CX&author=Du%2CJ#d=gs_qabs&t=1663736916548&u=%23p
%3DNs47NJMyLF8J

Cavazos-Dison, C., Logan, L., & Pisarski, D. (2012), "Social


Media as links to learning", Marketing Management
Association 2012 Fall Educators' Conference (p. 183).
Available online:
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/352888884_How_Onlin
e_Collaborative_Learning_leads_to_improved_Online_Learning_E
xperience_in_Higher_Education

CHED Memorandum Order No. 4


Available online:
https://ched.gov.ph/2020-ched-memorandum-orders/

Dascalu and Matu (2021): Dascalu, M.D.; Ruseti, S.; Dascalu,


M.; McNamara, D.S.; Carabas, M.; Rebedea, T.; Matu, S.T.
Before and during COVID-19: A cohesion network analysis of
students’ online participation in Moodle courses. Comput.
Hum. Behav. 2021, 121, 106780.
Available online:
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S074756322
1001035?via%3Dihub

Diep, N. A., Cocquyt, C., Zhu, C., & Vanwing, T. (2016).


Predicting adult learners’ online participation: Effects of

Page 108
altruism, performance expectancy, and social capital.
Computers & Education, 101, 84–101.
Available online:
https://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Predicting
%20adult%20learners%27%20online%20participation%3A%20Effects
%20of%20altruism%2C%20performance%20expectancy%2C%20and
%20social%20capital&journal=Computers
%20%26%20Education&volume=101&pages=84-
101&publication_year=2016&author=Diep%2CNA&author=Cocquyt
%2CC&author=Zhu%2CC&author=Vanwing
%2CT#d=gs_qabs&t=1663736952092&u=%23p%3DrLMr_xttdQsJ

Dyer, T.; Larson, E.; Steele, J.; Holbeck, R. (2015)


Integrating technology into online classrooms through
collaboration to increase student motivation.
Available online: JIR 2015_Dyer.pdf - Center for Innovation
in Research and Teaching (gcu.edu)

EdWeek Research Center and Lieberman (2021) Most Students


Now Have Home Internet Access. But What About the Ones Who
Don’t?
Available online: https://www.edweek.org/technology/most-
students-now-have-home-internet-access-but-what-about-the-
ones-who-dont/2021/04

Gall, M.D., Gall, J.P., Borg, W.R. (2007), Educational


research: An introduction (8th ed.). Boston: Pearson.
Google Scholar
Available online:
https://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?
hl=en&publication_year=2007&author=M.D.+Gall&author=J.P.
+Gall&author=W.R.+Borg&title=Educational+research
%3A+An+introduction

Gašević, D., Dawson, S., Rogers, T., & Gasevic, D. (2016).


Learning analytics should not promote one size fits all: The
effects of instructional conditions in predicting academic
success. The Internet and Higher Education, 28, 68–84.
Available online:
https://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Learning
%20analytics%20should%20not%20promote%20one%20size%20fits
%20all%3A%20The%20effects%20of%20instructional%20conditions
%20in%20predicting%20academic%20success&journal=The
%20Internet%20and%20Higher%20Education&volume=28&pages=68-
84&publication_year=2016&author=Ga%C5%A1evi
%C4%87%2CD&author=Dawson%2CS&author=Rogers

Page 109
%2CT&author=Gasevic%2CD#d=gs_qabs&t=1663736817717&u=%23p
%3DInR568gSzL4J

Grave (2010)
Available online:
https://www.academia.edu/36306347/
Effects_of_Time_Allotment_in_Studying_to_Academic_Performanc
e

Gupta, S.B.; Gupta, M. (2020): Technology and E-learning in


higher education.
Available online:
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/341734948_Technolog
y_and_E-Learning_in_Higher_Education

Harvey, H. L., Parahoo, S., & Santally, M. (2017). Should


gender differences be considered when assessing student
satisfaction in the online learning environment for
millennials? Higher Education Quarterly, 71(2), 141–158.
Available online:
https://doi.org/10.1111/hequ.12116

Huang, S., & Fang, N. (2013). Predicting student academic


performance in an engineering dynamics course: A comparison
of four types of predictive mathematical models. Computers &
Education, 61, 133–145.
Available online:
https://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Predicting
%20student%20academic%20performance%20in%20an%20engineering
%20dynamics%20course%3A%20A%20comparison%20of%20four%20types
%20of%20predictive%20mathematical%20models&journal=Computers
%20%26%20Education&volume=61&pages=133-
145&publication_year=2013&author=Huang%2CS&author=Fang
%2CN#d=gs_qabs&t=1663736978777&u=%23p%3DaGZAMR0XqxYJ

J. Sci. Educ. Technol. 2017, 26, 127–137.


Available online:
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10956-016-9657-x

Joksimović, S., Gašević, D., Kovanović, V., Riecke, B. E., &


Hatala, M. (2015). Social presence in online
discussions as a process predictor of academic performance.
Journal of Computer Assisted
Learning, 31(6), 638-654.
Available online:
doi:10.1111/jcal.12107

Page 110
Kahu, E. R. (2013). Framing student engagement in higher
education. Studies in Higher Education, 38(5), 758–773
Available online:
https://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Framing
%20student%20engagement%20in%20higher
%20education&journal=Studies%20in%20Higher
%20Education&volume=38&issue=5&pages=758-
773&publication_year=2013&author=Kahu
%2CER#d=gs_qabs&t=1663738532924&u=%23p%3D2wMDq59SlDgJ

Kahu, E. R., Picton, C., & Nelson, K. (2020). Pathways to


engagement: A longitudinal study of the first-year student
experience in the educational interface. Higher Education,
79, 657–673
Available online:
https://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Pathways
%20to%20engagement%3A%20A%20longitudinal%20study%20of%20the
%20first-year%20student%20experience%20in%20the
%20educational%20interface&journal=Higher
%20Education&volume=79&pages=657-
673&publication_year=2020&author=Kahu%2CER&author=Picton
%2CC&author=Nelson%2CK#d=gs_qabs&t=1663738567058&u=%23p
%3D7SV84L4_HwMJ

Kaithreen Cruz (2022): Manila Times, Commission on Higher


Education (CHEd)
Available online:
https://www.manilatimes.net/2022/03/13/news/more-than-300-
colleges-universities-resume-face-to-face-classes/1836127

Kim, D., & Kim, D. J. (2012). Effect of screen size on


multimedia vocabulary learning. British Journal of
Educational Technology, 43(1), 62–70.

Kots (2021)
https://www.northcentralcollege.edu/news/2020/09/17/how-
long-are-college-classes-today?
fbclid=IwAR15Clh29X5Wqq8PLGplZw4T0YuqofoP_vBNDJQlixeSBnKhxa9
KH9qQND8

Landrum Brittany (2020). Examining Students’ Confidence to


Learn Online, Self-Regulation Skills and Perceptions of
Satisfaction and Usefulness of Online Classes
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/
344050947_Examining_Students'_Confidence_to_Learn_Online_Sel
f-

Page 111
Regulation_Skills_and_Perceptions_of_Satisfaction_and_Useful
ness_of_Online_Classes

Lee and Recker (2021): The effects of instructors’ use of


online discussions strategies on student participation and
performance in university online introductory mathematics
courses. Comput. Educ. 2021, 162, 104084
Available online:
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S03601
31520302827?via%3Dihub

Lee and Recker (2021) Lee, J.E.; Recker, M. The effects of


instructors’ use of online discussions strategies on student
participation and performance in university online
introductory mathematics courses. Comput. Educ. 2021, 162,
104084.
Available online:
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S03601
31520302827?via%3Dihub

Li, C.; Lalani, F. The COVID-19 Pandemic Has Changed


Education Forever. This is How. World Economic Forum. 29
April 2020.
Available online:
https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2020/04/coronavirus-
education-global-covid19-online-digital-learning/

Michinov, N., Brunot, S., Le Bohec, O., Juhel, J., &


Delaval, M. (2018). Procrastination, participation, and
performance in online learning environments. Computers &
Education, 56(1), 243-252.
Available online:
doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.07.025

Mizal, Basith, and Tathahira (2021). PROMOTING STUDENTS’


CRITICAL THINKING THROUGH ONLINE LEARNING IN HIGHER
EDUCATION: Challenges and Strategies.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/346757517_PROMOTING
_STUDENTS'_CRITICAL_THINKING_THROUGH_ONLINE_LEARNING_IN_HIGH
ER_EDUCATION_Challenges_and_Strategies
Naffi, N., Davidson, A.-L., Snyder, D. M., Kaufman, R.,
Clark, R. E., Patino, A., Gbetoglo, E., Duponsel, N.,
Savoie, C., Beatty, B., Wallace, G., Fournel, I., & Ruby
(2020). Disruption in and by centres for teaching and
learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. Quebec, Canada:
International Observatory on the Societal Impacts of AI and
Digital Technology.

Page 112
Available online:
https://www.docdroid.com/L0khasC/whitepaper-disruption-in-
and-by-centres-for-teaching-and-learning-during-the-covid-
19-pandemic-leading-the-future-of-higher-ed-21-08-2020-pdf.

Niemela et.al. (2014)


Available online:
https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-662-44208-
1_8

Nistor, N.; Neubauer, K. From participation to dropout:


Quantitative participation patterns in online university
courses.
Available online:
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S074756322
1001035?via%3Dihub#

Nistor, N. (2013). Stability of attitudes and participation


in online university courses: Gender and location effects.
Computers & Education, 68, 284–292.
Available online:
https://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Stability
%20of%20attitudes%20and%20participation%20in%20online
%20university%20courses%3A%20Gender%20and%20location
%20effects&journal=Computers
%20%26%20Education&volume=68&pages=284-
292&publication_year=2013&author=Nistor
%2CN#d=gs_qabs&t=1663737057057&u=%23p%3DuxIZj6pLDgUJ

Office for Students. (2020). Digital poverty’ risks leaving


students behind [Press release] 3 September.
Available online:
https://www.officeforstudents.org.uk/news-blog-and-events/
press-and-media/digital-poverty-risks-leaving-students-
behind/.

Olakanmi, E.E. (2017). The effects of a flipped classroom


model of instruction on students’ performance and attitudes
towards chemistry. J. Sci. Educ. Technol.
Available online:
https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1126764

Paulsen, J., & McCormick, A.C. (2020). Reassessing


disparities in online learner student engagement in higher
education. Educational Researcher, published online 13
January 2020.
Available online:

Page 113
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X19898690.

Panigrahi, R., Srivastava, P., & Sharma, D. (2018). Online


learning: Adoption, continuance, and learning outcome—a
review of literature. International Journal of Information
Management, 43, 1–14
Available online:
https://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Online
%20learning%3A%20Adoption%2C%20continuance%2C%20and
%20learning%20outcome%E2%80%94a%20review%20of
%20literature&journal=International%20Journal%20of
%20Information%20Management&volume=43&pages=1-
14&publication_year=2018&author=Panigrahi
%2CR&author=Srivastava%2CP&author=Sharma
%2CD#d=gs_qabs&t=1663738464464&u=%23p%3DuvbrT87ZIzMJ

Picciano, A. G. (2002). Beyond student perceptions: Issues


of interaction, presence, and performance in
an online course. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks,
6(1), 21-40.
Retrieved from
https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/bfdd/
f2c4078b58aefd05b8ba7000aca1338f16d8.pdf

Raes, A., Detienne, L., Windey, I., & Depaepe, F. (2019). A


systematic literature review on synchronous hybrid learning:
Gaps identified. Learning Environments Research, published
online 28 November 2019.
Available online:
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-019-09303-z.

Rasheed, A. R., Kamsin, A., & Nor, A. A. (2020). Challenges


in the online component of blended learning: A systematic
review. Computers & Education, 144, 103701
Available online:
https://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Challenges
%20in%20the%20online%20component%20of%20blended%20learning
%3A%20A%20systematic%20review&journal=Computers
%20%26%20Education&volume=144&publication_year=2020&author=R
asheed%2CAR&author=Kamsin%2CA&author=Nor
%2CAA#d=gs_qabs&t=1663738424978&u=%23p%3DquLkOJD9kIkJ

Roddy, Amiet, Chung, Holt, Shaw McKenzie, Garivaldies,


Lodge, and Mundy (2017)
Available online:
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feduc.2017.0005
9/full

Page 114
Selvaraj and Others (2021): Selvaraj, A.; Radhin, V.;
Nithin, K.A.; Benson, N.; Mathew, A.J. Effect of pandemic
based online education on teaching and learning systems.
Int. J. Educ. Dev. 2021, 85, 102444.
Arce 2015: Higher Education Drop-Out in Spain—Particular
Case of Universities in Galicia
Available online:
https://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ies/article/view/4
3580

Selvaraj, A.; Radhin, V.; Nithin, K.A.; Benson, N.; Mathew,


A.J. Effect of pandemic based online education on teaching
and learning systems.
Available online:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34518732/

Silva, S., Badasyan, N., & Busby, M. (2018). Diversity and


digital divide: Using the national broadband map to identify
the non-adopters of broadband. Telecommunications Policy,
42(5), 361–373
Available online:
https://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Diversity
%20and%20digital%20divide%3A%20Using%20the%20national
%20broadband%20map%20to%20identify%20the%20non-adopters%20of
%20broadband&journal=Telecommunications
%20Policy&volume=42&issue=5&pages=361-
373&publication_year=2018&author=Silva%2CS&author=Badasyan
%2CN&author=Busby%2CM#d=gs_qabs&t=1663738394182&u=%23p
%3DoJTQUag64SUJ

Songkram (2017) Songkram, N. Online course design for


creativity and innovative skills in the virtual cultural
Asean community from research to empirical practice. Int. J.
Technol. Learn. 2017, 12, 4–20
Available online: https://online-journals.org/index.php/i-
jet/article/view/6032
Collaborative Skills

Stegmann, Wecker, Weinberger and Fischer (2012):


Collaborative argumentation and cognitive elaboration in a
computer-supported collaborative learning environment
Available online:
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11251-011-9174-5

Union of Students in Ireland. (2020). National report on


students and COVID-19. Dublin: Union of Students in Ireland.

Page 115
https://usi.ie/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/
COVID_RESEARCH_FINAL.pdf.

University of Alabama in Birmingham (UAB) (2021)


https://businessdegrees.uab.edu/blog/women-in-business-a-
trend-that-is-and-should-be-growing/

Wang, C., Fang, T. and Gu, Y. (2020) "Learning performance


and behavioral patterns of online collaborative learning:
Impact of cognitive load and affordances of different
multimedia", Computers & Education, Vol 143, p.103683
Available online:
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/352888884_How_Onlin
e_Collaborative_Learning_leads_to_improved_Online_Learning_E
xperience_in_Higher_Education

Zhu, C. (2012) Student satisfaction, performance, and


knowledge construction in online collaborative learning. J.
Educ. Technol. Soc.
Available online:
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/264974552_Student_s
atisfaction_performance_and_knowledge_construction_in_online
_collaborative_learning

5-hour online classes at colleges in Kerala


https://www.onmanorama.com/career-and-campus/top-news/
2021/05/29/kerala-colleges-online-class-timings.html?
fbclid=IwAR11XLlu77W0zRmv5VqjPzo5ubMCgIYPyxb-LWcAV6UX8yP-
HdsiQ6Op-Uo

Page 116

You might also like