Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Determination of Hardness of Water and Wastewater
Determination of Hardness of Water and Wastewater
PROCEDURE
1.00, 2.00, 5.00, 10.00, 15.00 and 20.00 mL of standard iron solution were
pipetted into separate 125 mL conical flasks and were labelled A- F
respectively. Each of them was filled with distilled water to 50mL mark using a
measuring cylinder. A blank solution of 50mL and 50mL distilled water was
transferred into the same 125mL Erlenmeyer flask using measuring cylinder.
1% of Hydroxylamine hydrochloride solution was then added to the unknown
sample in the 125mL conical flask. The was then heated to boiling for 15mins
until the solution reduces to 17mL and it was then cooled in ice bath.
Thereafter the solution was transferred into a 100mL volumetric flask and
added 10mL of ammonium acetate buffer solution, followed by 4mL of o-
phenanthroline and diluted to the mark with distilled water and mixed
thoroughly. The solution was allowed to settle for 2minutes for colour
development before measuring absorbance. Blank solution and calibration
standards were also prepared by similar procedure. The absorbance of
standards and unknown sample was measured at the wavelength of maximum
absorbance using a spectrophotometer at a fixed wavelength of 510nm. The
reference was the blank solution.
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
This experiment was aimed at determining the concentration of unknown
sample using spectrochemical measurements by spectrophotometric average.
The Fe3+ was reduced to Fe2+ due to excess addition of hydroxylamine
hydrochloride solution and ammonium acetate created a buffer environment
for different concentrations which vary in absorbance. At wavelength 520nm,
the amount of visible light absorbed was directly proportional to the
concentration of the sample. As proven by results above, at first concentration
was 0.0997 ppm with absorbance of 0.038 and as concentration increased to
1.9940 ppm absorbance increased to 0.399. The Beer’s Lambart law relates
concentration to absorbance. During this experiment errors might have been
encountered thus altering the results. Sources of error like, parallax error
when taking the reading from the measuring cylinder whilst measuring the
volume of water. Also, instrumental error on the readings of the UV-vis
spectrometer. The experiment was carried out with care to reduce errors.
CONCLUSION
The ppm of the unknown sample was calculated using the equation y=mx+c
from the graph and was 0.5261 ppm and the equation of the graph is
y=0.1996x. According to The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends
0.3 mg/l (WHO, 1993) as maximum concentration limit of iron in drinking
water.
REFERENCES
Introduction to Spectroscopy Donald L. Pavia - 4th edition 2009
Annem, Screenivasareddy, Determination of Iron Content In Water,2017. All
Capstone projects.
World Health Organisation Determination of Iron In Water Content 1993