Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Making A Dent in Human Trafcking Investigating The Efects of Social Institutions and Policies Across 60 Countries
Making A Dent in Human Trafcking Investigating The Efects of Social Institutions and Policies Across 60 Countries
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-021-09964-z
Laura A. Kabbash1 · Scott T. Ronis1
Abstract
Given the worldwide magnitude, pervasiveness and deleterious consequences of
human trafficking (Roth, 45), a more comprehensive understanding of its underlying
causes is imperative. This study attempted to examine the influence of three social
factors (i.e., economics, social capital, and criminal justice) on human trafficking in
60 countries. Although regression and Bayesian analyses showed that macro level
economic, social, and criminal justice factors were not predictive of human traffick-
ing, our findings highlighted the variability and potential inaccuracy in reporting of
information in many countries. Many factors contribute to unreliable human traffick-
ing data including: (1) inconsistencies in the application of trafficking legislation,
(2) problems with victim identification and reporting, (3) varying definitions and
counts of trafficking, (4) the creation of cultural binaries in the media, and (5) prob-
lematic human-trafficking policies. To accurately identify factors contributing or
maintaining human trafficking, it is critical for governmental and non-governmental
agencies to collect a range of standardized information.
* Scott T. Ronis
sronis@unb.ca
1
Department of Psychology, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, NB E3B 5A3, Canada
13
Vol.:(0123456789)
L. A. Kabbash, S. T. Ronis
poverty) have been examined in relation to victimization [21, 40]. Countries’ social
systems which can be understood as social structures that vary as a result of individ-
ual and government intervention, including a failing economy, inadequate education,
and inconsistent criminal justice application – have been theorized to undermine
societal support and protection, leaving people particularly vulnerable to exploita-
tion [39].
The intersection of countries’ poor economic standing, lack of social and employ-
ment opportunities, and inadequate criminal legislation create conditions condu-
cive to human trafficking. Understanding how these societal factors may support
opportunities for markets of human trafficking to grow may allow for national level
policies limiting human trafficking. Ecological theories (e.g., [7, 54] highlight how
the interactions of social factors (e.g., how a country’s economic climate can limit
access to effective education) foment the causes and maintenance of human traffick-
ing. Because victims of trafficking are among the most vulnerable populations and
often experience a host of negative outcomes, it is exigent to investigate how these
factors influence rates of trafficking.
For the current project, human trafficking was conceptualized in line with the defini-
tion put forth by the Trafficking Victims Protection Act (TVPA) [50]. The TVPA, a
United States federal statute passed in 2000, defines both domestic and international
trafficking of persons in two ways: (1) sex trafficking in which a commercial sex act
is induced by force, fraud, or coercion, or in which the person made to perform this
act is not yet 17 years of age, or (2) recruitment, harboring, transportation, provi-
sion, or obtaining of a person for labor or services, through the use of force, fraud,
or coercion for the purpose of subjection to involuntary servitude, peonage, debt
bondage, or slavery (as cited in [52]). As outlined by Aronowitz [3], human traffick-
ing typically follows three phases: (1) recruitment, often characterized by fraudulent
promises or kidnapping; (2) transportation and entry, when victims are transported
internationally (international trafficking), or within the city or country (domestic
trafficking); and (3) exploitation, when victims are forcefully introduced into illicit
sex and labor markets. In an effort to address inconsistencies surrounding definitions
of human trafficking and goals for its elimination, an internationally recognized set
of standards—the Palermo Protocols—were established and adopted by the U.N. in
2000 [2]. Present conceptualizations of sex trafficking are subsumed under human
trafficking because sex trafficking comprises a significant proportion of human traf-
ficking occurrences along with labor trafficking [51].
High poverty rates and significant income stratification in countries create environ-
ments with few opportunities for economic or personal growth, which heighten the
risk for trafficking exploitation [39]. Gross domestic product (GDP) per capita (i.e.,
13
Making a dent in human trafficking: investigating the effects…
Social phenomena that decrease one’s potential for success and prosocial growth
may be linked to higher rates of trafficking. Indeed, strain theory posits that a soci-
ety’s high standard for relative success creates conditions in which people who are
not provided with adequate licit means to success are often are more vulnerable to
coercion and exploitation [33, 36]. Consistent with strain theory, people who per-
ceive less licit means to success may engage in various illicit activities, including
human trafficking, to obtain their goals.
Education rates
Because low education (i.e., high school dropout rates) negatively affects opportuni-
ties for growth and capital (e.g., physical, social) gains [12], it is also likely associ-
ated with higher rates of victimization through trafficking [17, 39]. Fedina and col-
leagues [15] found that nearly half their sample of trafficked individuals had dropped
out of school. It follows that countries with higher levels of educational achievement
would be generally less prone to trafficking, as their citizens would be less vulner-
able to exploitation, have more prosocial opportunities, and be more likely to under-
stand the consequences of illegal behavior. Because statistics are collected at the
country level, it is also possible that countries with greater social opportunities act
as incubators of human trafficking, ensnaring individuals attempting to escape their
country of origin, resulting in higher rates of reported trafficking in economically
prosperous countries.
Gender inequality
Research suggests countries with higher rates of gender disparity in political posi-
tions of power are likely to experience higher rates of human trafficking [11, 41].
Rao and Presenti [43] outline two economic reasons to explain why human traffick-
ing may be related to lower gender equality. First, because trafficked women expe-
rience inequality in their countries of origin, they represent a subset of migrants
13
L. A. Kabbash, S. T. Ronis
searching for higher incomes. Second, a lack of economic prosperity for women in
their native country results in a societal “devaluation”, which increases their risk
of being sold to traffickers. Taken together, a country’s level of gender inequality
and disparity in access to services and social opportunities can increase or decrease
women’s vulnerability and risk for being trafficked [24].
Nichols and Heil’s [39] third social institution, criminal justice interven-
tions, describes the presence, quantity, and effectiveness of police interven-
tions and their role in the trafficking industry at its entry and exit points.
Through protective policy implementation, the criminal justice system can
help reduce entry into trafficking networks and facilitate safety among vic-
tims. This is achieved through active policing to apprehend traffickers and
subsequent appropriate sentencing [1]. Unfortunately, government and police
corruption have been found to be significant predictors of human trafficking
[4]. Although non-consensual prostitution practices are inherent to sex traf-
ficking, consensual prostitution can occur independent of the sex trafficking
industry. However, in many countries where prostitution remains a criminal
offence, victims of sex trafficking are often prosecuted for their involuntary
engagement in sexual activity, potentially driving them further into the illicit
sex trade [48, 53].
Prostitution legislation
13
Making a dent in human trafficking: investigating the effects…
Tier placement
Based on the extant literature and Nichols and Heil’s [39] work, the three social
institutions–a country’s economic climate, education and social capital, and
criminal justice interventions–all play a role in aiding our understanding of why
human trafficking occurs. However, consistent with other theoretical frameworks
(e.g., ecological theory), societal factors (e.g., economic, political, cultural) do not
operate in isolation, but continuously interact and influence overall societal cli-
mate [18, 29]. As such, it is important to more broadly consider factors comprising
these key social institutions (e.g., GDP per capita, prostitution legislation).
Consistent with Nichols and Heil’s [39] emphasis on broad social institutions and
ecological theories [7, 54], the purpose of this study was to provide a framework
to investigate the relationship between social institutions and human trafficking
rates. The research questions and corresponding hypotheses for the current study
were:
13
L. A. Kabbash, S. T. Ronis
Method
Secondary data were collected via an iterative search process of country-level indi-
cators mirroring target social institutions (i.e., economic success, education and
social capital, and criminal interventions). This secondary data was collected from
multiple sources outlined in further detail below (e.g., the Central Intelligence
Agency [CIA] World Factbook).
Power analyses are a tool used to estimate the required sample size in order to
detect an effect. Based on a hypothesized medium effect size, the selected number
of countries was determined based on an a priori power analysis conducted using
G*Power. This power analysis indicated that 58 countries (29% of all countries rec-
ognized by the United Nations) would be required to conduct the appropriate analy-
ses (i.e., multiple regression). Countries were sampled randomly with approximate
representation across the four prostitution legislation types, overall population size,
and government types (e.g., democracy, dictatorship, monarchy). Government type
for each country was referenced from the CIA World Factbook [8] to ensure varia-
tion in types included in the analysis.
The U.S. Department of State’s annual Trafficking in Persons report [52] provides
insight on whether countries are abiding by the standards set forth by the TVPA
established in 2000, which requires the serious and sustained effort to minimize and/
or eliminate severe forms of human trafficking. Each country’s narrative provides
an overview of its anti-trafficking laws, efforts to both protect and identify victims,
13
Making a dent in human trafficking: investigating the effects…
efforts to prosecute offenders, and other factors (e.g., identification of especially vul-
nerable populations, recruitment techniques used) that make certain groups of peo-
ple more vulnerable to trafficking.
Specific statistics outlining rates of forced sexual exploitation of children and adults
were provided by both country and region in a 2018 report from the United Nations
Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC). The report covers 142 countries and pro-
vides an overview of trafficking cases detected between 2014 and 2017. These sta-
tistics served as the basis for rates of human trafficking for each country included in
the analyses, standardized by country population size (e.g., number of victims per
100,000 people).
Economic success
GDP per capita, a typical index of standard of living [55], was obtained from the
CIA World Factbook [8], which provides frequently updated information on the
economy, people, government, and transnational issues of 267 world entities.
Education rates
The percentage of people over 25 in a given country who have completed at least
lower secondary education was used an indicator of national educational achieve-
ment in the current study. This index is generated by the United Nations Educa-
tional, Scientific and Cultural Organisation and was last updated in 2018.
Gender inequality
Gender inequality was assessed using the United Nation’s annual Gender Inequal-
ity Index (GII). The GII can be understood as a representation of combined loss in
achievement of reproductive health, empowerment and labor market participation
due to national gender inequalities. This index is generated by the UN on the basis
of three dimensions: (1) Health (i.e., comprises maternal mortality ratio and ado-
lescent birth rate); (2) Empowerment (i.e., female and male population with com-
pleted secondary education, and female and male shares of parliamentary seats); and
(3) Labor Market (i.e., evaluates female and male labor force participation rates).
Overall, the GII represents how women are disadvantaged across these three dimen-
sions. Scores range from 0 to 1, with higher GII values indicating greater inequali-
ties between men and women.
13
L. A. Kabbash, S. T. Ronis
Criminal interventions
Prostitution legislation
1. Prohibitionist: prostitution is illegal and both the third parties and prostitutes are
liable.
2. Regulation model: prostitution is legal and the state plays a role in its regulation.
3. Neo-Abolitionism model: only the buyer is criminalized.
4. Decriminalization model: prostitution is decriminalized and remains unregulated.
Tier placement
Tier placement [52] refers to a government’s efforts to meet standards for the elimi-
nation of human trafficking. The U.S. Department of State reports tier placement for
every country included in the analysis.
Results
Given that human trafficking statistics are notoriously difficult to collect, the dataset
had a significant portion of missing data. Following a missing value analysis, human
trafficking in 2016 was chosen as the criterion variable, as it had the lowest percent
of missing data (6%) relative to the rates for other available years (e.g., 2014, 2015,
2017) and allowed for the most comprehensive comparison between countries. A
square root transformation was applied to the criterion variable to address skewness
and overall variability [22].
To examine the association between key social institutions via psychosocial vari-
ables (e.g., social factors that can affect an individual’s access to resources, which in
turn influence functioning) and human trafficking rates worldwide, a simultaneous
13
Making a dent in human trafficking: investigating the effects…
linear regression was conducted with the following variables: GDP per capita, coun-
try tier placement, rank of GII, prostitution legislation, and national educational
achievement. The overall regression model was not significant, F(5, 47) = 0.53,
p = 0.81, with the combined set of predictors accounting only for 8% of overall var-
iance in 2016 human trafficking rates (see Table 1). Further interpretation of the
regression results is not warranted because of the non-significant finding. However,
given the questionable reliability of available human trafficking data, it is possible
that true underlying relationships among factors are lost due to inconsistency in traf-
ficking data.
To understand the magnitude of difference in likelihood between the null and
alternative hypotheses, a bayesian ANCOVA was conducted using the JASP soft-
ware. The Bayesian framework allows for a comparison of likelihood between the
null and alternative hypotheses [42]. The Bayes factor (BF10 = 0.03) indicated that
the alternative hypothesis is 33 times less likely than the null hypothesis. Accord-
ing to Lee and Wagenmarkers’ [34] classification scheme, this suggests very strong
evidence favoring the null hypothesis (e.g., these variables cannot accurately predict
variations in human trafficking rates).
Discussion
The explanation for statistical non-significance may lie in the questionable reli-
ability of the human trafficking data. For the statistical analyses in the current
study to have detected even a small effect, a minimum of 109 countries would
have needed to be included. Many factors contribute to unreliable human traffick-
ing data, and this issue can be broken down into several components: (1) prob-
lems with victim identification and reporting, (2) varying definitions and counts
of trafficking, (3) inconsistencies in the application of trafficking legislation, and
the creation of cultural binaries in the media, and (4) problematic human-traffick-
ing policies.
13
L. A. Kabbash, S. T. Ronis
Inconsistencies in tabulation
13
Making a dent in human trafficking: investigating the effects…
13
L. A. Kabbash, S. T. Ronis
Cultural binaries
13
Making a dent in human trafficking: investigating the effects…
Conclusion
13
L. A. Kabbash, S. T. Ronis
References
1. Albright, E., & D’Adamo, K. (2017). Decreasing human trafficking through sex work decriminali-
zation. AMA Journal of Ethics, 19, 122–126. https://doi.org/10.1001/journalofethics.2017.19.1.
sect2-1701.
2. Amahazion, F. (2014). Global anti-sex trafficking: State variance in implementation of protectionist
policies. Human Rights Quarterly, 36, 176–209. https://doi.org/10.1353/hrq.2014.0015.
3. Aronowitz, A. A. (2009). Human trafficking, human misery: The global trade in human beings.
Praeger.
4. Bales, K. (2007). What predicts human trafficking? International Journal of Comparative and
Applied Criminal Justice, 31(2), 269–279. https://doi.org/10.1080/01924036.2007.9678771.
5. Barreto, S. M. (2017). Why does happiness matter? Understanding the relation between positive
emotion and health outcomes. Social Science & Medicine, 191, 61–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
socscimed.2017.08.029.
6. Boyce, S. C., Brouwer, K. C., Triplett, D., Servin, A. E., Magis-Rodriguez, C., & Silverman, J. G.
(2018). Childhood experiences of sexual violence, pregnancy, and marriage associated with child
sex trafficking among female sex workers in two US-Mexico border cities. American Journal of
Public Health, 108, 1049–1054. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2018.304455.
7. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design.
Harvard University Press.
8. Central Intelligence Agency. (2018). The world factbook, 2017–18. Author.
9. Cho, S.-Y., Dreher, A., & Neumayer, E. (2014). Determinants of anti-trafficking policies: evidence
from a new index. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 116(2), 429–454. https://doi.org/10.
1111/sjoe.12055.
10. Cockbain, E., & Bowers, K. (2019). Human trafficking for sex, labour and domestic servitude: how
do key trafficking types compare and what are their predictors? Crime, Law and Social Change,
72(1), 9–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-019-09836-7.
11. Coy, M. (2012). Prostitution, harm and gender inequality: Theory, research and policy. Ashgate
Publishing.
12. De Angelis, M. (2016). Human trafficking: Women’s stories of agency. Cambridge Scholars
Publishing.
13. Deering, K., Amin, A., Shoveller, J., Nesbitt, A., Garcia-Moreno, C., Duff, P., & Shannon, K.
(2014). A systematic review of the correlates of violence against sex workers. American Journal of
Public Health, 104, 42–54. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2014.301909.
14. Di Nicola, A., Orfano, I., Cauduro, A., & Conci, N. (2005). Study on national legislation on pros-
titution and trafficking in woman and children. TRANSCRIME, Joint Research Center on Transna-
tional Crime.https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-80851.
15. Fedina, L., Williamson, C., & Perdue, T. (2016). Risk factors for domestic child sex trafficking in
the United States. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 34, 2653–2673. https://doi.org/10.1177/08862
60516662306.
16. Gerassi, L. B., & Nichols, A. J. (2018). Sex trafficking and commercial sexual exploitation: preven-
tion, advocacy, and trauma-informed practice. Springer Publishing.
17. Gerassi, L. B., & Nichols, A. J. (2018). Heterogeneous perspectives in coalitions and community-
based responses to sex trafficking and commercial sexual exploitation: Implications for practice.
Journal of Social Service Research, 44(1), 63–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/01488376.2017.1401028.
18. Germain, C. B., & Bloom, M. (1999). Human behavior in the social environment: an ecological
view. Columbia University Press.
19. Goubin, S. (2018). Is inequality a latent construct? An assessment of economic inequality indicators
and their relation with social cohesion in Europe. Social Indicators Research, 136, 21–40. https://
doi.org/10.1007/s11205-016-1522-z.
13
Making a dent in human trafficking: investigating the effects…
20. Greenbaum, J., & Crawford-Jakubiak, J. E. (2015). Child sex trafficking and commercial sexual
exploitation: Health care needs of victims. American Academy of Pediatrics, 135, 566–574. https://
doi.org/10.1542/peds.2014-4138.
21. Greeson, J. K. P., Treglia, D., Wolfe, D. S., & Wasch, S. (2019). Prevalence and correlates of
sex trafficking among homeless and runaway youths presenting for shelter services. Social Work
Research, 43(2), 91–99. https://doi.org/10.1093/swr/svz001.
22. Hayes, A. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A
regression-based approach. (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.
23. Hedlin, S. (2017). Can prostitution law reform curb sex trafficking? Theory and evidence on
scale substitution, and replacement effects. University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform, 50(2),
329–386.
24. Hepburn, S., & Simon, R. J. (2013). Human trafficking around the world: Hidden in plain sight.
Columbia University Press.
25. Hernandez, D., & Rudolph, A. (2015). Modern day slavery: What drives human trafficking in
Europe? European Journal of Political Economy, 38, 118–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.
2015.02.002.
26. Hickle, K., & Roe-Sepowitz, D. (2018). Adversity and intervention needs among girls in residential
care with experiences of commercial sexual exploitation. Children and Youth Services Review, 93,
17–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2018.06.043.
27. Ibrahim, D. (2018). Trafficking in persons in Canada, 2016(85–005-X). Statistics Canada Juristat
Bulletin.
28. Jakobsson, N., & Kosadam, A. (2013). The law and economics of international sex slavery: Pros-
titution laws and trafficking for sexual exploitation. European Journal of Law and Economics, 35,
87–107. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10657-011-9232-0.
29. Jones, L., Engstrom, D., Hilliard, P., & Sungakawan, D. (2011). Human trafficking between Thai-
land and Japan: lessons in recruitment, transit and control. International Journal of Social Welfare,
20(2), 203–211. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2397.2009.00669.x.
30. Kelly, L., Coy, M., & Davenport, R. (2009). Shifting sands: A comparison of prostitution regimes
across nine countries. London Metropolitan University.
31. Kragten-Heerdink, S. L., Dettmeijer-Vermeulen, C. E., & Korf, D. J. (2018). More than just pushing
and pulling: Conceptualizing identified human trafficking in the Netherlands. Crime & Delinquency,
64, 1765–1789. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128717728503.
32. Laczko, F., & Gozdziak, E. (2005). Data and Research on Human Trafficking. In Data and research
on human trafficking: A global survey. International Organization for Migration.
33. Lee, D., & Cohen, J. (2008). Examining strain in a school context. Youth Violence and Juvenile Jus-
tice, 6, 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541204007308430.
34. Lee, M. D., & Wagenmakers, E. J. (2014). Bayesian cognitive modeling: A practical course. Cam-
bridge University Press.
35. Marks, G. (2005). Cross-national differences and accounting for social class inequalities in educa-
tion. International Sociology, 20, 483–505. https://doi.org/10.1177/0268580905058328.
36. Merton, R. (1938). Social structure and anomie. American Sociological Review, 3(5), 672–682.
37. Meyers, D. T. (2014). Poverty, agency, and human rights. Oxford University Press.
38. Nichols, A. J. (2016). Sex trafficking in the United States: Theory, research, policy, and practice.
Columbia University Press.
39. Nichols, A., & Heil, E. (2015). Challenges to identifying and prosecuting sex trafficking cases in
the midwest United States. Feminist Criminology, 10, 7–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/1557085113
519490.
40. O’Brien, J. E., White, K., & Rizo, C. F. (2017). Domestic minor sex trafficking among child wel-
fare-involved youth: an exploratory study of correlates. Child Maltreatment, 22(3), 265–274. https://
doi.org/10.1177/1077559517709995.
41. Park, J. (2014). The impact of gender attainment and inequality on female sex trafficking: Cross-
national analysis (unpublished doctoral dissertation). Illinois State University.
42. Quintana, D. S., & Williams, D. R. (2018). Bayesian alternatives for common null-hypothesis
significance tests in psychiatry: A non-technical guide using JASP. BMC Psychiatry, 18 (7), 1–8.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-018-1761-4.
43. Rao, S., & Presenti, C. (2012). Understanding human trafficking origin: A cross-country empirical
analysis. Feminist Economics, 18, 231–263. https://doi.org/10.1080/13545701.2012.680978.
13
L. A. Kabbash, S. T. Ronis
Publisher’s Note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published
maps and institutional affiliations.
13