Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Onlaj Nastava U Visokom o
Onlaj Nastava U Visokom o
Марија Р. Марковић
Универзитет у Нишу, Филозофски факултет
marija.markovic@filfak.ni.ac.rs
Рад је финансијски подржало Министарство просвете, науке и технолошког развоја
Републике Србије.
Марковић, М.: Претпоставке ефикасне онлајн наставе у високом обраѕовању
„Наука, настава, учење у измењеном друштвеном контексту” • стр. 17–30
УВОД
18
Марковић, М.: Претпоставке ефикасне онлајн наставе у високом обраѕовању
„Наука, настава, учење у измењеном друштвеном контексту” • стр. 17–30
19
Марковић, М.: Претпоставке ефикасне онлајн наставе у високом обраѕовању
„Наука, настава, учење у измењеном друштвеном контексту” • стр. 17–30
20
Марковић, М.: Претпоставке ефикасне онлајн наставе у високом обраѕовању
„Наука, настава, учење у измењеном друштвеном контексту” • стр. 17–30
21
Марковић, М.: Претпоставке ефикасне онлајн наставе у високом обраѕовању
„Наука, настава, учење у измењеном друштвеном контексту” • стр. 17–30
22
Марковић, М.: Претпоставке ефикасне онлајн наставе у високом обраѕовању
„Наука, настава, учење у измењеном друштвеном контексту” • стр. 17–30
23
Марковић, М.: Претпоставке ефикасне онлајн наставе у високом обраѕовању
„Наука, настава, учење у измењеном друштвеном контексту” • стр. 17–30
24
Марковић, М.: Претпоставке ефикасне онлајн наставе у високом обраѕовању
„Наука, настава, учење у измењеном друштвеном контексту” • стр. 17–30
25
Марковић, М.: Претпоставке ефикасне онлајн наставе у високом обраѕовању
„Наука, настава, учење у измењеном друштвеном контексту” • стр. 17–30
ЗАКЉУЧАК
26
Марковић, М.: Претпоставке ефикасне онлајн наставе у високом обраѕовању
„Наука, настава, учење у измењеном друштвеном контексту” • стр. 17–30
Литература
Abe, J. A. A. (2020). Big five, linguistic styles, and successful online learning. The
Internet and Higher Education, 45,1–9.
Baranik, E. L., Wright, A. N. & Reburn, L. K. (2017). Mentoring relationships in online
classes. The Internet and Higher Education, 34, 65–71.
Beldarrain, Y. (2006). Distance Education Trends: Integrating new technologies to foster
student interaction and collaboration. Distance Education, 27(2), 139–153.
Bolliger, U. D. & Wasilik, O. (2009). Factors influencing faculty satisfaction with online
teaching and learning in higher education. Distance Education, 30(1), 103–116.
Broadbent, J. & Poon, L. W. (2015). Self-regulated learning strategies & academic
achievement in online higher education learning environments: A systematic
review. Internet and Higher Education, 27, 1–13.
Bruggeman, B., Tondeur, J., Struyven, K., Pynoo, B., Garone, A. & Vanslambrouck, S.
(2021). Experts speaking: Crucial teacher attributes for implementing blended
learning in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 48, 1–11.
Cheawjindakarn, B., Suwannatthachote, P. & Theeraroungchaisri, A. (2012). Critical
Success Factors for Online Distance Learning in Higher Education: A Review of
the Literature. Creative Education, 3 (Supplement), 61–66.
Crawford-Ferre, G. H. & Wiest, R. L. (2012). Effective Online Instruction in Higher
Education. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 13(1), 11–14.
Distance education programs: Interregional Guidelines for the Evaluation of Distance
Education (Online Learning) (2011). Philadelphia: Council of Regional
Accrediting Commissions, Middle States Commission on Higher Education.
Retrieved April 28, 2021 from the World Wide Web https://www.ship.edu/
27
Марковић, М.: Претпоставке ефикасне онлајн наставе у високом обраѕовању
„Наука, настава, учење у измењеном друштвеном контексту” • стр. 17–30
globalassets/pcde/guidelines_for_the_evaluation_of_distance_education_programs.
pdf.
Edmunds, A. J., Gicheva, D., Thrift, B. & Hull, M. (2021). High tech, high touch: The
impact of an online course intervention on academic performance and persistence
in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 49, 1–10.
Fish, W. W. & Wickersham, E. L. (2009). Best Practices for Online Instructors –
Reminders. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 10(3), 279–284.
Han, H. & Johnson, S. D. (2012). Relationship between students’ emotional intelligence,
social bond, and interactions in online learning. Educational Technology & Society,
15(1), 78–89.
Herrera-Pavo, A. M. (2021). Collaborative learning for virtual higher education.
Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 28, 1–11.
Kenzig, J. M. (2015). Lost in Translation: Adapting a Face-to-Face Course into an
Online Learning Experience. Health Promotion Practice, 16(5), 625–628.
Kerr, S. M., Rynearson, K. & Kerr, C. M. (2006).Student characteristics for online
learning success. Internet and Higher Education, 9(2), 91–105.
Keržič, D., Tomaževič, N., Aristovnik, A. & Umek, L. (2019). Exploring critical factors
of the perceived usefulness of blended learning for higher education students. PLoS
ONE, 14(11), 1–18.
Littenberg-Tobias, J. & Reich, J. (2020).Evaluating access, quality, and equity in online
learning: A case study of a MOOC-based blended professional degree program.
The Internet and Higher Education, 47, 1–11.
Menchacaa, P. M. & Abate Bekeleb, T. (2008). Learner and instructor identified success
factors in distance education. Distance Education, 29(3), 231–252.
Milićević, V., Denić, N., Milićević, Z., Arsić, Lj., Spasić-Stojković, M., Petković, D.,
Stojanović, J., Krkić, M., Sokolov Milovančević, N. & Jovanović, A. (2021).
E-learning perspectives in higher education institutions. Technological Forecasting
& Social Change, 166(11), 1–5.
Money, H. W. & Dean, P. B. (2019). Incorporating student population differences for
effective online education: A content-based review and integrative model.
Computers & Education, 138(1), 57–82.
Moyle, K. (2010). Building Innovation: Learning with technologies. Australia, Victoria:
Australian Council for Educational Research.
Noetel, M., Griffith, S., Delaney, O., Sanders, T., Parker, P., del Pozo Cruz, B. &
Lonsdale, C. (2021). Video Improves Learning in Higher Education: A Systematic
Review. Review of Educational Research, 20(10), 1–33.
Shah, S. S., Shah, A. A., Memon, F., Kemal, A. A. & Soomro, A. (2021). Online
learning during the COVID-19 pandemic: Applying the self-determination theory
in the ‘new normal’. Revista de Psicodidáctica. In press, https://www.
elsevier.es/en-revista-revista-psicodidactica-english-edition--244-avance.
28
Марковић, М.: Претпоставке ефикасне онлајн наставе у високом обраѕовању
„Наука, настава, учење у измењеном друштвеном контексту” • стр. 17–30
Stöhr, C., Demazière, C. & Adawi, T. (2020).The polarizing effect of the online flipped
classroom. Computers & Education, 147, 1–12.
Tynan, B., Ryan, Y. & Lamont-Mills, A. (2015).Examining workload models in online
and blended teaching. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(1), 5–15.
Vernon, R., Valtaiaiii, H., Pierce, D., Pittman-Munice, P. & Frantz Adicins, L. (2009).
Distance education programs in social work: current and emerging trends. Journal
of Social Work Education, 45(2), 263-276.
Wang, C., Hsu, K. H.-C., Bonem, M. E., Moss, D. J., Yu, S., Nelson, B. D. & Levesque-
Bristol, C. (2019). Need satisfaction and need dissatisfaction: A comparative study
of online and face-to-face learning contexts. Computers in Human Behavior, 95,
114–125.
Wang, X. C. (2015). Conversations with innovators in learning and technology.
TechTrends, 59(5), 14–16.
Yа Ni, А. (2013). Comparing the Effectiveness of Classroom and Online Learning:
Teaching Research Methods. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 19(2), 199–215.
Zenović, I. i Bagarić, I. (2014). Trendovi u otvorenom učenju na daljinu u svetu i kod
nas. Međunarodna naučna konferencija Sinteza 2014. Impact of the Internet on
Business Activities in Serbia and Worldwide (379–384). Beograd: Univerzitet
Singidunum.
29
Марковић, М.: Претпоставке ефикасне онлајн наставе у високом обраѕовању
„Наука, настава, учење у измењеном друштвеном контексту” • стр. 17–30
Marija R. Marković
University of Niš, Faculty of Philosophy
ASSUMPTIONS OF EFFECTIVE ONLINE TEACHING
IN HIGHER EDUCATION
Summary
As digital media permeate all aspects of our lives, achieving distance learning
today, and in the future, can be considered inevitable, for the effectiveness of which it is
necessary to provide appropriate preconditions. After the sudden outbreak of the
pandemic in late 2019 and early 2020 caused by the appearance of the COVID19 virus,
faculties around the world were forced to reorganize and move to online classes as soon
as possible, in order to enable students to continue the academic year. The aim of this
paper is to point out the basic assumptions of successful online teaching in higher
education, which is assumed to continue to exist in some form after the end of the
pandemic. The given assumptions will be presented in the form of pointing out the
specifics of online teaching, which are significantly related to the success of students in
it. It is possible to single out three groups of such specifics: individual specifics of the
students themselves, characteristics of online teaching and characteristics of the higher
education institution, which are described in more detail in the paper. Such teaching
primarily implies adequate preparation of teachers and students in terms of developing
appropriate individual competencies. In addition, an important factor of successful
online teaching implies the existence of appropriate institutional support at the level of a
specific higher education institution in its implementation. The given recommendations
can be a good starting point for the implementation and improvement of the quality of
online teaching in higher education in our country.
Keywords: online teaching, higher education, competence development,
institutional support.
30