Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Transformation - How HUL Makes CEOs Out of College Kids THREE CHAPTERS
Transformation - How HUL Makes CEOs Out of College Kids THREE CHAPTERS
College Kids
Foreword:
HUL’s training hotbed is an imposing multi-storey building on the Worli sea face.
The structure has a large foyer, and black marble steps that lead up to a glass
door. On entering the building you are at once struck by the messages on the
walls. One large painting spurs you on to achieve perfection. Another poster
implies that learning is a life long journey. Outside of the walls, the entrance is
bare, save for a sofa in one corner and a solitary desk nestled below the
staircase with a phone on it. Surprisingly there is no one seated behind the desk
to greet visitors.
On the 8th of July, 2001, I found myself at the entrance of this building, tired and
drenched by a monsoon shower, contemplating the artworks on the wall. In the
absence of any directions I looked around the room for guidance. On the desk
lay a folder with a list of the names of the participants for the ‘BLT
Familiarization Program’. I heaved a sigh of relief when I saw my name at the
bottom of the list.
I made my way up the steps I to locate my room for the night. At the top of the
staircase are sofa and a television. There is an animated crowd of boys and girls
watching a riveting Wimbledon final. As Ivanisevic and Rafter match each other
stroke for stroke, the tension in the room in palpable. I make my way to my
room to deposit my suitcase and return to catch the end of the match with the
rest of the gang. I have just commenced a critical journey that HLL has recently
rechristened the Business Leadership Trainee Program. It is a journey that will
take me to no less than 32 different cities across the length and breadth of the
country as I ramp up from a corporate green horn to a sales manager
responsible for 200 Cr of top line sales in 12 short months. It is a corporate
boot-camp like no other.
- Selecting to Win
- Spotting Talent Early
- Training for Leadership – The BLT Program
- Leveraging the Organization’s Expertise
- The Tools of Leadership – LDT / 70-20-10 / DAP / 360 / MBTI
Deliberate practice
- Performance-enhancing Design
- Repeatability
- Continuous Feedback
- Mentally Rigorous
- Tedious
10,000 hours
- Sales Management
- Brand Management
The search for the 50 odd participants in this unique training program begins
many months before the commencement date when talent spotters first start
visiting the campuses of the leading colleges, and management and engineering
schools in India. Managers routinely take time off from their day jobs to make
trips to these hot beds of talent to answer questions and make presentations
about the organization. The intention is to give the students as much
information as they possibly need to make an informed decision as they begin
to think about their careers.
About 2-3 months before the final term at B School, companies begin to
descend on campuses making Pre Placement Talks. The approaches to woo
students are many. While all the presentations are slick, the presenters vary
from the ridiculous to the sublime. In the past, companies conducted internship
interviews straight after their Pre Placement Talk, but that has since given way
to a more systematic “Placement Week”. The HUL talks have almost always
been constructed around the notion that “Real Business is Pure Adrenalin”. The
speaker alludes to their first hand experiences. The focus is on delivering some
real value to the organization through experiences that enrich you. She will
emphasize that careers over here offer flexibility across a number of ‘lanes’ and
different business categories. She will often mention the two most valuable
assets in the organization as people and brands.
For many years, the process of selection of the people has been important
enough for two directors of the company to fly down to these 20 odd campuses
to conduct final interviews. Before a candidate gets to that stage, she must have
successfully navigated a stringent short-listing process based on a custom
questionnaire that includes questions like:
What are your long term and short term career goals?
What has influenced your thinking while evaluating your career option?
Describe a challenging and difficult project which you have undertaken. What
did you do? Explain your reasons for the same and what was the outcome?
Describe a situation where you have needed to involve others to achieve a task
or deal with conflict among team members. What did you do? Explain your
reasons for the same and what was the outcome?
Describe a situation / project where you have been able to bring tangible
benefit to the end customer / consumer by adopting an innovative approach.
What did you do? Explain your reasons for the same and what was the
outcome?
To go along with the application form, is a test* that one must complete in 50
minutes. The 50 questions consist of a barrage of puzzlers that require ability to
reason logically. There are some questions around data interpretation, reading
comprehension and mathematical ability. Built into the test is the need to
prioritize time in order to maximize your score as it is close to impossible to get
through all the 50 questions in the allotted time. A sample of the famed ‘The
HLL Recruitment test” is in the appendix.
The first round consists of a group discussion on a simple one-page case with a
few data points. There isn’t quite enough information to say anything with
certainty and participants must make assumptions and logical deductions in
order to move the group to a consensus around the answers to a set of
questions posted at the end of the case. The proceedings are observed by two
managers, one from the talent function, while the other is a line manager. They
have a detailed list of leadership competencies and are watching for
contributions from the participants that illustrate each competency. A positive
illustration of the competency results in a ‘+’ while a negative display is marked
‘-‘. This close observation proceeds for the entire duration of the discussion and
when the observers have enough information about the candidates the
discussion is brought to a close. The cases are collected from the participants
Both observers will then sit down to tally their observations and arrive at a
consensus on which candidates they should put through to the preliminary
interview stage. Specific behaviors and statements will be recalled to illustrate
the rationale for selection or rejection. In the event that either of the observers
disagrees, the candidate isn’t selected.
Within an hour of the completion of the first stage of the process, a shortlist is
up on the notice board. The shortlist is met with elation, disappointment and in
some cases abject shock. Every selection process comes fraught with some error
and recruiter bias, no matter how well you hard wire it. Placement committees
will do their best to push the case of a candidate who really wants to work for
this organization. The company representative will try and push in a few CVs
that didn’t make the original shortlist. Whether these candidates will get an
interview is often a function of time available to the recruiters, the number of
people the company is planning to recruit and the performance of the people
originally shortlisted.
One subject probed in depth will then yield to another often unconnected
subject area. For instance, what design modifications would you make to a
bottle of jam intended to be used exclusively by a blind person? This could
generate additional questions regarding modifications to the supply chain: what
you might do to make a retail environment more convenient for a blind
shopper? Or then what communication strategy you would deploy to reach this
niche in the most cost efficient manner?
Still other questions will follow in a bid to ensure that the candidate is not just
intellectually sound, but creative and versatile in their thinking. Candidates who
use a lot of jargon will find themselves having to explain the concept of an IP
address under the assumption that the panelists are their great grandparents.
Other favorites that come up to be explained in layman’s terms are email,
virtual reality, micro wave ovens etc.
Almost every candidate will be forced to negotiate a gray area where the
intrinsic value system will be put to test. “You absolutely have to make it to a
meeting, but you don’t have a ticket. The Ticket Examiner can be placated with
a facilitating payment. What do you do?”. “You have noticed that your friend
has carried a cheat sheet into the examination hall and is using it during the
examination. What will you do?”. “A colleague of you has claimed personal
travel expenses from the organization. You know that reporting of this kind of
graft will lead to the termination of his services. What will you do?” It is in the
negotiation of these murky waters where judgment can often get blurred that
If a candidate stands up to the panel’s scrutiny, answers all the deep probes
successfully and both interviewers have enough information to make a decision,
the candidate is then given a chance to ask the panelists a question if they so
desire. More often than not, the candidate is surprised by this sudden shift in
power and politely declines. Others are able to keep their composure and ask a
question that suggests they have researched the company well and are already
beginning to form a considered view about the policies and practices. A well
constructed question to close the interview always disposes the interviewers
favorably to the candidate as they finally thank her for interviewing with the
organization.
Once the candidate has left the room, the panelists are left to discuss their
observations. Great care is taken to avoid judgmental feedback; the focus is on
the quality of answers, number of options generated, criteria enlisted before
arriving at the course of action and creativity in overcoming the obstacle.
Sometimes notes taken in the course of the interview are referred to. If the
decision is a unanimous ‘Yes’, there is no trouble at all, but when the verdict is
split the evidence-based discussion must continue till one of the panelists
revises their position. If the stalemate persists, the candidate will not be sent
forward.
The final hurdle is an interview with two executive directors of the company.
The structure of these interviews is a closely guarded secret that only those who
have experienced it are privy to. Should you make it through this final hurdle,
you get to be a part of the famous Business Leadership Training program!
With the competition for talent from India’s Ivy League Schools only getting
more intense with every passing year, the summer internship has taken on a
new importance. This 8 week internship gives both the candidate and the
organization a great chance to assess fitment and make a judgment that is likely
to be far more accurate than one based on a forty five minute interview.
For many years now, the rigor and detailing that goes into the construction of
this 8 week internship distinguishes the “BLT prep” program from assignments
that other recruiters offer during the placement weeks.
Some of the most impactful projects have been seeded in the work of these
bright interns and this is evident from the success of Project Shakti, the launch
of Lifebuoy Liquid Hand Wash, the Bru Vending Machines and the Swirls parlors.
Most of the work done by an intern will be in the market in 3-6 months from the
time the internship is complete. With a view to provide a global working
experience, a significant number of interns now spend these 8 weeks overseas
at another Unilever unit, and in 2010, one in every two interns got an
opportunity to work on an international project.
For many prospective employees, this is their first working experience, and at
HUL a lot of effort goes into making it an enjoyable one. The trainees are
welcomed with banners and a 2 day induction program during which many
senior managers will come address them. Almost all of them will draw on their
experience when they were summer interns and impart a few words of wisdom
to help the new interns make the most of their stint here. During this time, each
intern will also become acquainted with the elaborate support structure that
the organization puts in place to guide them through this new experience called
‘the corporate world’.
Each trainee will be assigned a Tutor, a Mentor and a Buddy. While the tutor is
essentially the joint owner of project the trainee is assigned to be working on
and gives day to day guidance on project delivery, the mentor discusses
performance at regular intervals and shares her perspective on development
and career options. She uses her functional experience to provide the trainee
with developmental inputs and helps to assess the trainee’s fit with the
Should the stature of the mentor and tutor startle the trainee there is always a
Buddy to can count on. He is a young alumnus from the trainee’s institute who
still has a vivid recollection of his early days in the organization. He has a non-
evaluative role and eases you into a new environment. Importantly, the buddy is
a support system that the intern can always count on and serves as a sounding
board at every step of the summer journey.
8 weeks is a very short time. It is time aplenty for things to go wrong though,
and everyone is cognizant of this. A summer internship at Unilever is serious
business and at no point is an intern treated any differently than an actual
employee. To ensure that value is created, both for the organization and the
trainee, a detailed agenda is charted out complete with timelines for appraisals,
feedback sessions and contacts with tutors and mentors. To ensure that
progress is tracked at a more granular level, the 8 week period is broken in to
four chunks.
In the next three weeks it is time to push for closure as the deadline
approaches. The tutor will encourage the trainee to start putting a draft
presentation together as the sixth week begins so that one gets a sense of
everything coming together while still having the time to research any gaps that
might become apparent once it is put together. It is also the time the trainee
builds back some of the feedback and perspective from the tutor and mentor
respectively. At this time the trainee might reach out to the mentor for an
unofficial view on the project and get the counsel of the buddy too. These three
weeks typically fly by and a trainee is often found burning the midnight oil.
A story is told about a determined young trainee at the old Hindustan Lever
Office at Backbay Reclamation. In the last week of his internship he was
assigned a small sub project that wasn’t part of the original brief. As he
approached the deadline for the Friday morning presentation to the Category
Head, he realized he needed another four to six hours of work on the final
presentation. The problem was that it was 8:00 PM on Thursday when this
realization dawned on him. He decided to catch some sleep first so he headed
A vigilant guard had noticed that the lights had come on in the building and
decided to do a quick round of the premises. After confirming the presence of
an ‘intruder’ on the floor he contacted his superior. Contact was made with the
Administration Manager, who in turn called the Category Head and informed
him that his cabin had been broken into and that some form of corporate
espionage was underway. The Category Head suggested that the confrontation
be done immediately and the suspect apprehended.
Imagine the trainee’s bewilderment when at 4:30 in the morning, all the lights
came on and 12 guards marched purposefully onto the desolate floor to arrest
him! He at once professed his innocence, flashed his identity card excused
himself and got back to work. He had caused enough commotion; his
presentation was his last hope.
When his bleary eyed Category Head sat through his presentation and
congratulated him on a job well done, he added the words – “Your commitment
is exemplary, and I must acknowledge you for it, even if it resulted in my
household being awakened at an unearthly hour”. The trainee landed a Pre-
Placement offer from the company.
Project largely completed, the last week is spent ensuring the final review and
appraisal is done in as comprehensive a fashion as possible. This is a formal
interaction to assess the project outcomes and evaluate trainee behavior
against the Unilever Standards of Leadership. The tutor will give the trainee
instances over the last 8 weeks where he has demonstrated a particular
behavior and also highlight behaviors that weren’t in the interest of moving the
team forward.
The summer internship experience will end with a ‘Summer Summit’. This
workshop will reunite all the interns for a two day 'Functional Focus' workshop
where they will get the opportunity to interact with some of the finest minds at
the company and learn about some of the business practices. The action packed
eight weeks will be brought to a close with a party that goes on till the wee
hours of the morning.
Twenty four hours later, the trainees will be informed about the evaluation of
their performance. On the average 70% of the interns will have landed a Pre-
Placement Interview. These interns will then be interviewed by a panel of senior
manager, often on the same day, in a process akin to the one used for final
recruitments on campuses.
In this era of hyper-competition for talent, students will return to their schools
to discover whether they have landed a Pre-Placement offer or not. A Hindustan
Lever PPO, as the terminology goes, means a lot back on campus. To have a job
with one of the most sought-after marketing employers even before you get
cracking in the fourth semester is a luxury only a handful of trainees experience
on each campus. In more recent times, as much as 50% of the intake in to the
BLT program comes via this route.
The management trainee program has run largely unchanged in structure for
over 25 years in HUL. The only notable change was the rechristening that
happened in 2001. From being the MT (management trainee) program it
became the BLT (business leadership trainee) program. The organization’s
conviction in the quality of this program is reflected in their willingness to hire
undergraduates and put them in roles at par with post graduates after an
extended period of training. Following their 24-month training program, young
graduates who joined the organization straight out of undergraduate schools
like St. Stephen’s and Lady Shri Ram were stepping into jobs that people 2-3
years their senior were doing, and performing at par with them. That’s probably
why the BLT program is often referred to as a ‘Practical MBA’.
A closer look at the structure of the program reveals a calendar that is broken
down into a number of stints that are modular and are broadly divided into core
/ cross-functional and international assignments. The normal duration of the
program for a MBA recruit is 15 months. The program consists of certain core
stints, cross functional stints, a 4 week long CSR stint and even a 6 week long
international stint.
While the core stint is aligned to your functional area of specialization in order
to give you a comprehensive exposure of your function, the cross-functional
stints help you understand how each functional area links up with the
company's overall plans and thus help you understand Business Leadership in
the truest sense. The international stint shapes you for Global Leadership,
whereas the rural stint enables you to connect with a part of India that most
marketers have read about but never experienced.
Learning paths are different from function to function. Someone looking to build
a career in the sales and marketing function will have a journey that is distinct
from someone building a career in the talent management function.
A trainee in the Talent function will start her journey with ten weeks in a
Factory. After that will come four weeks in sales, three weeks in a branch, three
weeks in a regional HR role, six weeks in a Business HR role, two week working
with the Service Delivery Team, four weeks on Central Employee Relations, four
weeks in a village in rural India, six weeks as part of the Leadership
Development Team and a six week assignment in a Unilever company overseas.
Again, the training will end with a 13 week period of sub-charge post which the
trainee will attend a confirmation interview.
The BLT Program takes in between 40-60 trainees every year, split across two
batches. While the first batch comes in during May, the second batch embarks
on this journey in July. The journey begins for batch after batch in Gulilta, HUL’s
equivalent of GE’s Crotonville. This multi-storey building on the Worli seaface
has marked the first day of service for many generations of employees. The
program’s kick-off is done by no less than the CEO of the company.
For many, this is the first experience in the corporate world and with everyone
looking to err on the side of caution, 50% of the batch is impeccably attired in
suits and ties for their first interaction with the chairman. The chairman arrives
briskly and proceeds to take off his coat and loosen his tie. The CEO is quick to
create at relaxed atmosphere in the room and asks, “Why are you all wearing
suits and ties? In this company only the CEO and the car drivers wear ties!”
In the first few seconds, an important message has been imparted to the eager
listeners. This organization is about rolling your sleeves up, getting out in the
plants and markets and getting the job done. The CEO dwells on his experiences
with trainees, and charge them with the responsibility of asking as many
In the course of the two days a number of speakers from different functions
come in and address the new kids on the block. Notably, a bunch of graduates
who has just completed the program and assumed full time managerial
responsibility also comes along and shares their experiences. These two days
mark a particularly busy time for the program manager, who over the course of
the next 15 months becomes a foster mother for these young trainees spread
out across the length of the country.
After the onboarding, the trainees bid each other farewell and head out to their
first stint. More often that not, it is a core stint, and the challenge from day one
is substantial. Noel M Tichy, who for many years ran General Electric’s
management development center at the behest of Jack Welch, has an
interesting way of explaining performance. He uses three concentric circles. The
inner circle is labled “Comfort Zone”, the middle one is “Learning Zone” and the
outer one “Panic Zone”. He characterises the middle one as the zone where
performance requires skills and abilities that are just outside of one’s reach. He
argues that we never make progress when we are in the comfort zone, because
we merely reapeat activities that we can easily do already. In the panic zone,
the size of the task is so substantial that we can’t even begin to imagine how to
get off the starting blocks. Over the next 15 months a trainee will find himself in
the middle zone for a majority of the time, having to constantly acquire new
skills and abilities to make it from one crisis to the next.
Atul Gawande in his book, The Checklist Manifesto makes a compelling case for
the use of checklists across a number of disciplines. From the cockpit of a Being
747 to the Emergency Wards in hospitals, checklists have been proven to raise
the performance of pilots and medical practitioners. He defines two kinds of
checklists that are most prevalent: DO-CONFIRM & READ-DO. With a DO-
CONFIRM checklist the trainee goes through each day in the training program
depending predominantly on their experiences and memory. They then have a
review or a contact with a tutor or coach where the jointly run through the
Logistics
Costs in a Business
Consumer Understanding
Brand Innovation
Task Status
In Market
Shopper Understanding
Role Comprehension
And yet all this comes down when the job’s done
Showing off walls of sure and solid stone.
The tutor is usually the person responsible for the skill based learning and
typically has about 5 years of experience in the company. More often than not,
a tutor would himself have been through the training program and is able to
empathize with the trainee. Since the tutor is responsible for skill training for a
particular stint, a trainee will end up having a number of tutors as she goes
through the program. The tutor assigns the trainee challenging projects that
encompass learning objectives, in addition to on-the-job training. Significantly,
each tutor must do a comprehensive evaluation and provide evidence based
feedback to the trainee at the end of each stint. Projects must be evaluated for
quality of analysis and content; in some cases the recommendations will be
implemented immediately. In the course of the next 15 months, five to six
different managers will do similar in-depth evaluations and feedback sessions
with the trainee, thus helping the trainee build a robust and grounded
assessment of her abilities.
Outside of the stint specific support in the form of a tutor, there are a number
of other formal learning relationships that are established at the start of the
training program. These relationships are rigidly defined for the duration of the
training period but often blossom into lifelong relationships.
Each trainee is assigned a buddy - usually a senior from the same institute but a
couple of year’s senior in the company. This is a non-evaluative role; it ensures
The role of the buddy is based on the insight that new recruits are hesitant to
demonstrate vulnerability in the early part of their career and that they are
likely to be most comfortable confiding in someone closer to them in age and
with a similar education background. By sharing his or her experiences, a buddy
helps a trainee understand the challenges of the program and the rationale
behind some of the perceived ‘impossible’ elements of the training.
While the learning objectives and training calendar require frequent and time
bound contacts with the tutor, meetings with the buddy, coach and mentor are
left to the trainee to schedule as per mutual convenience. The initial meeting is
facilitated centrally, but once that is done, the responsibility lies with both the
people in the relationship to make it work for the benefit of the trainee.
A significant responsibility lies with the tutor, and the organization takes no
chances with this role. Every year, when young managers become eligible to
tutor fresh recruits they will be invited to Gulita for a two day Tutor’s Workshop.
The workshop is designed to showcase feedback from trainees who have had
great experiences as well as those with the not-so-great experiences. First time
tutors are taken through modules that include: giving powerful evidence based
feedback, the GROW model of coaching and a presentation on the myths of
coaching.
Many first time tutors promptly stick their hands up in agreement when these
statements flicker on the screen. Over the next few hours the presenter
systematically demolishes these ‘myths’, frequently calling on his experiences as
a coach and tutor. He illustrates the tangible benefits of being a great tutor in
terms of having more time, building a stronger organization, and creating a
following within the company. He concludes that coaching, far from being a
philanthropic act, is purely selfish. He narrates a tale of a demanding trainee he
once had that pushed him to discover an element of his personality that no one
else had brought to his notice, and how that element was coming in the way of
him being fully effective. He emphasizes how coaching helps you get to know
yourself better, become more aware of your blocks. He gives the rapt audience
an example of the most effective coaching he got when he was a trainee in the
form of a 2 minute chat over the phone with his tutor.
Most first time tutors carry this passion into their first tutoring assignment. They
have project briefs ready well before the trainee arrives. The distributors to
which trainees will be sent are briefed, as are the salesmen and field officers
who will work closely with the trainee during the shadow stints. Tutoring is
serious stuff and this is reflected throughout the organization.
At the end of each stint, an appraisal is complete only when the trainee has
given feedback on the quality of tutoring she has received. A score of 4 on 5 is
the bare acceptable minimum. Any tutor getting a score lower than this is
singled out for a counseling session with the line manager. The best tutors with
scores in excess of 4.8 on 5 will get a personal congratulatory message from the
director of the function. Training the next generation of leaders is every
manager’s responsibility and the focus begins right at the very top.