Professional Documents
Culture Documents
SMR GROUP3 MiniResearch
SMR GROUP3 MiniResearch
SMR GROUP3 MiniResearch
January 2023
ii
_____________________________________
__________________________________
By:
January 2023
iii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
Title Page i
List of Tables iv
Chapter 1: INTRODUCTION
Theoretical Framework 1
Chapter 2: METHODS
Research Questionnaire 5
Research Problem 1 7
Research Problem 2 8
Research Problem 3 9
Chapter 4: CONCLUSION
Conclusion 12
References 13
Appendices
iv
LIST OF TABLES
Table Page
1 6
Chapter 1
INTRODUCTION
Statement of the Problem
This study is conducted to assess the level of understanding of the respondents about the
Continental Drift theory, and to gather pieces of evidence that predicts the future of the
a. age;
b. gender; and
2. What is the level of understanding of the respondents about the continental drift theory?
Theoretical Framework
The theory that revolutionized our understanding of how continents move over the
surface of the Earth was called continental drift. Wegener's continental drift theory in geoscience
was the first to talk about moving continents. This made it clear how fossilized plants and
animals and related rock formations could live on different continents. As Wegener suggested,
this ancient supercontinent, called Pangaea, did exist until it broke up about 200 million years
ago (Oskin, 2021). This enormous land mass eventually split into seven smaller land masses,
which are today's recognizable continents. Even though these continents are constantly shifting,
vi
we rarely see them. Wegener must have provided a justification for making this decision (Jalan,
2022).
The scientist Alfred Wegener is most closely connected with the concept of continental
drift. Wegener wrote a paper outlining his notion that the continents were "drifting" across the
Earth, occasionally crashing through oceans and into one another, in the early 20th century. He
referred to it as continental drift (National Geographic, 2022). A geologist has shown that there
was once a single large landmass on the surface of the earth, and that it broke up into smaller
pieces that drifted away. In a few cases, the drifting pieces ran into each other, stuck together,
Wegener found that the rock layers on the east coast of South America and the west coast
of Africa "fit" just as plainly as pieces of a jigsaw puzzle. There were more continents with
similar geology besides South America and Africa (National Geographic, 2022). Some of the
continents on an Earth map may appear to fit together, if you look at one. Francis Bacon, who
saw the similarities between the Atlantic coasts of Africa, North and South America, and Europe
in the 17th century, was the first to make mention of this occurrence. The fact that the continents
were originally linked and have since drifted away, or "continental drift," accounts for the
Wegener was aware that fossilized plants and animals could be found on several
continents, including Mesosaurus, a freshwater reptile that was restricted to South America and
Africa during the Permian epoch. Additionally, he put the rock formations on either side of the
Atlantic Ocean together similar to a puzzle.For example, the rocks of Santa Catarina, which are
located in Brazil, and the Karoo layers, which are located in South Africa, both fit together. The
vii
Appalachian Mountains, which are located in the United States of America, and the Caledonian
Mountains, which are located in Scotland, also fit together. According to National Geographic,
plates pressing together built the Himalayas, the highest mountains in the world, and the
mountains are constantly growing as a result (Oskin, 2014). The fossil record is one sort of
evidence that has been used to support the Theory of Continental Drift. In rocks with a similar
age, scientists have discovered fossils of related plant and animal species. The coastlines of many
continents were home to these rocks. The continents may have formerly been connected,
according to this. For instance, freshwater reptile Mesosaurus fossils have been discovered in
both Brazil and western Africa. Lystrosaurus fossils have also been discovered in Antarctica,
The North and South Poles, which are roughly parallel to the axis of rotation, determine
the Earth's magnetic field. In the Northern Hemisphere, the lines of magnetic force flow into
Earth, and in the Southern Hemisphere, they flow out of Earth. The magnetic force trends at
various angles to the surface in various locations as a result of the shape of the field lines. The
force is vertical at the North and South Poles. The magnetic force is horizontal everywhere along
the equator, and it is at an oblique angle to the surface everywhere else. The minerals that make
up magma are flexible in their fluid state and can travel in any plane. However, movement stops
and the location and orientation of the minerals are set as the lava cools and solidifies. Similar to
how a compass needle aligns with the magnetic field to point north, the magnetization
orientation of the mineral magnetite (Fe3O4) as it crystallizes from magma is parallel to that of
the Earth's magnetic field at that time. We refer to this magnetic record in the rock as residual
magnetism. Basalt is particularly prone to this kind of magnetization because it cools from a high
temperature and typically has relatively high amounts of magnetite, although sedimentary rocks
viii
and other types of rocks can also be magnetized if they have a high concentration of magnetite
(Webb, 2020). According to Encyclopedia, the study of magnetism in prehistoric rocks is known
as paleomagnetism. Achilles Delesse (1817–1881), a French physicist, made the initial discovery
of the phenomena in 1849 when he noticed that some magnetic minerals in rocks were aligned
parallel to the Earth's magnetic field. The French scientist Bernard Brunhes (1867–1910) made
an analogous finding in 1906. Brunhes noticed that some rocks' magnetic minerals are orientated
exactly the opposite way from what would be anticipated if they were functioning as simple
compasses. In other words, some of these minerals had their north poles pointing towards the
north magnetic pole of Earth and their south poles pointing at the south magnetic pole of Earth
(Newton, 2004).
ix
Chapter 2
METHODS
Survey Questionnaire
SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE
We are carrying out an evaluation on the knowledge of Grade 11 STEM Students about
Continental Drift Theory. Your response to this survey is crucial in providing the necessary
information. If you have any query about the questionnaire, please do not hesitate to approach
the researchers. Your honest and sincere response and time given to answer the evaluation is
greatly appreciated.
Instruction: Please check or supply the information needed in the space provided.
1. Age
2. Sex
[ ] Male [ ] Female
x
Evaluate the following statements about Continental Drift Theory. Check the box of the
of the response that best describe your evaluation with the following scales:
I understand …
4 that South America and Africa were said to be connected because of the
similarities in rocks and mountains.
Chapter 3
This chapter contains the presentation, analysis, and interpretation of the data.
Presentation of the results, interpretations and discussions will be arranged according to the order
Research Question #1:What are the demographic profile of the students in terms of
AGE
Frequency Percentage
TOTAL 20 100%
SEX
Frequency Percentage
Male 9 45%
Female 11 55%
Table 2 presents the overall frequency count and the percentage of the data according to
age and sex. In terms of age, most of the students are within the age range of 16 years old.
Additionally, it can be seen from the table that there are more female students than male students
in terms of percentage.
xii
Research Question #2: What is the level of understanding of the respondents about the
Based on the table above, most of the respondents understand that the shapes of
continents fit each other. Respondents may still have some questions about the rest of the pieces
of evidence of the continental drift theory as 5/6 questions have been marked as good when it
comes to their understanding. According to the result shown at this table, the respondents may
Research Question #3: What predictions are made about the movement of the continents?
It can be seen above the 4 predictions of what might happen in the future if the plates
continue to move. Further, most of the authors state the possible name of the future
supercontinent and also the continents or countries that will collide or merge after a billion years
from now. The supercontinents are named as Amasia, Ultima, Pangea Proxima, and
Novopangea. Furthermore, it can also be seen in the table the possible reasons for the movement
Chapter 4
CONCLUSION
This chapter delineates the conclusions or the insights of the researchers from conducting
the study. In addition, it shall also elaborate the recommendations or suggestions of the
Conclusion
The researchers came to the conclusion that the majority of the students who responded
to the questionnaire are primarily male and that the majority of them are between the ages of 16
years old after collecting data on the demographic profile of the students.
Further, the results in the form of stanine showed that most of the students have the scale
4 and 5 with a quality index of good and very good respectively. The researchers concluded that
xv
most of the students were performing significantly well in their studies . Furthermore, there were
few students who answered on the scale of 2 and 3 which is poor and average . Moreover, there
are also predictions made that after years if the plates continue to move it will be one again.
These supercontinents are Amasia, Pangea Ultima, Pangea Proxima, and Novopangea.
Finally, after the computation and analysis the researchers concluded that the students’
understood the theory well. And predictions of being one of the continents again someday may
be true but this is all just a prediction there is still no concrete evidence that this phenomenon
might happen.
REFERENCES
Bangor University (2018). What planet Earth might look like when the next Supercontinent forms
planet-eart h-might-look-like-when-the-next-supercontinent-forms-four-scenarios-
38900
Chander, R. (1999). Wegener and his Theory of Continental Drift. Retrieved from https://link.spr
inger.com/article/10.1007/BF02839011
xvi
future-earth-supercontinent-pangaea-proxima
Curtin University (2022). Behold! The world's next Supercontinent, Amasia. Retrieved from htt
https://scitechdaily.com/behold-the-worlds-next-supercontinent-amasia/
Earle, S. (2019). 4.1 Alfred Wegener and the Theory of Plate Tectonics. Retrieved from https://r
wu.pressbooks.pub/webboceanography/chapter/4-1-alfred-wegener-and-the-
theory-of-pla te-tectonics/
Earthhow (2022). Pangea Ultima: Meet Earth’s next Supercontinent. Retrieved from
https://earthhow.com/pangea-ultima/
Encyclopedia Britannica, (2022). Continental Drift and Plate Tectonics. Retrieved from
https://letstalkscience.ca/educational-resources/backgrounders/continental-drift-and-
plate-tectonics https://scitechdaily.com/behold-the-worlds-next-
supercontinent-amasia/
Feerick, J. (2020). The next Pangea: What Earth’s future Supercontinent will look like.
what-earths-futu re-supercontinent-will-look-like
Green, M. , et. al. (2018). In the future, Earth will have just one Continent. It might look like
supercontinent-might-look-like-one-of-these/amp
xvii
https://www.npr.org/2012/02/08/146572456/amasia-the-next-supercontinent
Houser, K. (2018). Experts predict what Earth’s next Supercontinent will look like.
Jacobs, F. (2022). What the world will look like in the year 250,002,018. Retrieved from
https://www.freethink.com/energy/pangaea-proxima?amp=1
Jalan, M. (2022). What is the Continental Drift Theory and how is it related to Plate
drift-theory-definition-how-different-plate-tectonics.html?
fbclid=IwAR1BO7OY2KgCaUt1-J0uXyrzXVt1djwFd221iITOiqIgqvu0Or970dBstC4
Maxwell, A. (2020). Pangaea Theory has Earth’s surface on the move. Retrieved from
https://now.northropgrumman.com/pangaea-theory-has-earths-surface-on-the-move/
https://education.nationalgeographic.org/resource/continental-drift/
National Geographic Society, (2022). Continental Drift versus Plate Tectonics | National
https://education.nationalgeographic.org/resource/continental-drift-versus-plate-tectonics/
https://www.encyclopedia.com/science/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/
paleomagnetism-0
Oskin, B. (2014). Tectonic puzzle: Why West Africa didn’t follow South America. Retrieved
xviii
from livescience.com.https://www.livescience.com/44011-rifting-gondwana-africa-
fbclid=IwAR1O48gfyYkp7wDaEzdqkKkyNcZYGviqwUrrzfZ6eI9fTeaSBA79wPGwAe
Strange Maps (2021). Four scenarios for the next supercontinent. Retrieved from https://bigthin
k.com/strange-maps/next-supercontinent/
Webb, P. (2020). 4.2: Paleomagnetic evidence for Plate Tectonics. Geosciences LibreTexts.
Retrieved from
https://geo.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Oceanography/Book:_Introduction
_to_Oceanography_(Webb)/04:_Plate_Tectonics_and_Marine_Geology/4.02:_Paleomagn
etic_Evidence_for_Plate_Tectonicsy
Woodward, A. (2022). Will there ever be another Pangaea?. Retrieved from https://www.
Lives cience.com/63753-will-there-be-another-pangea.html
xix
Appendix 3
Thematic Analysis for SOP #3
Statement of the Question Significant Statements Grouping of Themes
Problem (#3) Significant
Statement
xxii
What will happen to "Think about closing the Red- New Super Amasia
3.What predictions are the continents if the
Caribbean Sea — you have now Continent Amasia
made about the plates continue to
fused North and South America,"
movement of the move?
Mitchell says. "And then by fusing
continents?
the Arctic Ocean, you would
suture the Americas with Eurasia".
That would create a supercontinent
called Amasia that would form at
the top of the Earth. Eventually it
would slump south toward the
equator. And under this scenario,
Antarctica might remain isolated
at the bottom of the world (Harris,
2012).Ramirez*
Appendix 4
xxix