GRAPH SHOWING PANEL MEMBERS

RESPONSE TO THE PRODUCT'S COLOUR

8
7
6
5
4
COLOUR
RATING

3
2
1
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10
SON SON SON SON SON SON SON SON SON N
R R R R R R R R R O
PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE RS
PE
PANEL MEMBERS

Fig 1.1a
From the responses, the Planbre-cranut had an acceptable colour as more than half
the panelists agreed by responding “like moderately” and “like very much”.

3D GRAPH SHOWING PANEL MEMBERS

RESPONSE TO THE PRODUCT'S APPEAR-
ANCE
7
6
5
4
3 APPEARANCE
RATING

2
1
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
SON SON SON SON SON SON SON SON SO N ON
R R R R R R R R R RS
PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE
PANEL MEMBERS

Fig 1.2a
As for the appearance, some of the panel members thought the appearance
satisfactory. Few thought that it was neutral (neither like nor dislike) while one did
not like the appearance a little. From the results, modifications will be done to
improve the appearance of the product in the next trial so that panel members
would have a positive response to the product.

BAR GRAPH SHOWING PANEL MEMBERS

RESPONSE TO THE PRODUCT'S ODOUR
PEROSN 10
PERSON 9
PERSON 8
PERSON 7
PANEL MEMBERS

PERSON 6 ODOUR
PERSON 5
PERSON 4
PERSON 3
PERSON 2
PERSON 1
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
RATING

Fig 1.3a
All the panel members had a positive reaction to the product’s odor with different
ranges of likeability such as “like moderately”, “like very much”, and “like
extremely”.
 LINE GRAPH SHOWING PANEL MEMNERS
RESPONSE TO THE PRODUCT'S TASTE
9
8
7
6
5
4 TASTE
RATING

3
2
1
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
SON SON SON SON SON SON SON SON SON O N
R R R R R R R R R RS
PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE
PANEL MEMBERS

Fig 1.4a

For taste, some panel members had a neutral response while others
really liked the taste. For the next trial, a new ingredient/s may be added
and the recipe’s quantity may be changed.

3D GRAPH SHOWING PANEL MEMBERS

RESPONSE TO THE PRODUCT'S CONSIS-
TENCY/ TEXTURE
7
6
5
4 CONSISTENCY/ TEXTURE
3
RATING

2
1
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
O N ON O N ON O N O N ON O N ON N
RS ERS ERS ERS ERS ERS ERS ERS ERS RSO
PE P P P P P P P P PE
PANEL MEMBERS

Fig 1.5a
For consistency/texture, a few panel members had a neutral response to
the product’s consistency/texture while others had a positive response.
Temperature and how well the ingredients are prepared are factors that
can affect the consistency therefore, for the next trial, these factors will
be taken to account by allowing the product to cool and properly prepare
ingredients for use.

LINE GRAPH SHOWING PANEL MEMBERS

RESPONSE TO THE PRODUCT'S FLAVOUR
9
8
7
6
5
4 FLAVOUR
RATINHS

3
2
1
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
SON SON SON SON SON SON SON SON SON O N
R R R R R R R R R RS
PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE PE
PANEL MEMBERS

Fig 1.6a
All but one panel member had a neutral response to the flavor of the product. By
mixing all the shredded, dry, and liquid ingredients, the flavors from each
ingredient complement each other creating a unique twist to the product.