GROUP #: 5 - HYPERBOLE SECTION: BSED-ENGLISH 1B

Members (Last Name, First Name, M.I.):

1.) GAID, Issabelle O.
2.) GALIT, Ricca Joy M.
3.) GALON, Risha Bless P.
4.) GO, Kyll Frances Bob A.
5.) JADMAN, Cristian L.

Activity 8: Credibility and Reliability of Sources (TEAM ACTIVITY)

INSTRUCTIONS:
As a team, decide whether the following materials in the links provided can be reliable
sources if one decides to make a research work about the slang terms in the Philippines.
1. Based on CAPPS and CRAAP tests, determine whether each material can be a reliable
reference for a research article.
2. Justify your answers in 2-3 sentences each.
3. Only one member per team will submit the team's output.
4. Points will be deducted to teams who will not follow instruction

1. Filipino Slang Through the Decades

(https://www.esquiremag.ph/long-reads/features/filipino-slang-through-the-decades-
a00293-20191214-lfrm)
Answer: Unreliable
Justification: The article titled Filipino Slang Through the Decades is unreliable.
The currency is current, it had an author, it was useful, but lacked comprehensive
citations, and some of the data was taken from Wikipedia.

2. Filipino Slang Conditions so you are able to…

(https://uho.ac.id/prodi/paud/2022/08/09/15-filipino-slang-conditions-so-you-re-able-to/)
Answer: Unreliable
Justification: The author's name is present, but no credentials or whereabouts
of the author were found. There were no cited references either. Additionally, no
sources were mentioned. The author also offered thoughts without citing any
evidence or sources to back them up.

3. Internet Slang Words in Filipino That Pinoy Millennials Use

(https://www.filipinopod101.com/blog/2019/07/23/filipino-text-slang/#6)
Answer: Unreliable
Justification: The article is unreliable as a source for research. There is no
reference in it. The page is useful for learning about internet slang, but it isn't
specific or trustworthy enough to be used as a source for further study.