"Global Digitalisation and The EU's Digital Diplomacy: Challenges and Opportunities"

Digitalization has rapidly transformed the way we live, work, and interact. It has also had a
significant impact on the way states conduct their foreign policy, including digital diplomacy.
As the world becomes increasingly interconnected, digital diplomacy has become an
important tool for states to advance their foreign policy goals and interests. The European
Union (EU) has recognized the importance of digital diplomacy and has made it a key
component of its foreign policy. However, the EU faces several challenges and opportunities
as it seeks to use digital diplomacy to further its foreign policy goals.

One of the main challenges the EU faces in its digital diplomacy is the lack of a unified digital
strategy. Each member state has its own digital diplomacy strategy, which can lead to a lack
of coordination and consistency in the EU's approach to digital diplomacy. This can make it
difficult for the EU to effectively communicate its message and achieve its foreign policy
goals. Additionally, the EU's digital diplomacy is often hindered by a lack of resources and
capacity. The EU's external action service, which is responsible for coordinating the EU's
foreign policy, has a limited budget and staff, which can make it difficult for the EU to fully
engage in digital diplomacy.

Another challenge the EU faces in its digital diplomacy is the issue of online disinformation.
The spread of disinformation online has become a major concern for the EU, as it can be used
to interfere in elections and manipulate public opinion. The EU has taken steps to address this
issue, such as by establishing a task force on disinformation and launching a code of practice
for online platforms. However, the EU's efforts to address disinformation have been met with
resistance from some member states and online platforms, which have criticized the EU's
approach as being overly restrictive.

Despite these challenges, there are also several opportunities for the EU to use digital
diplomacy to further its foreign policy goals. One of the main opportunities is the use of
digital diplomacy to promote the EU's values and interests. The EU is a strong advocate for
human rights, democracy, and the rule of law, and it can use digital diplomacy to promote
these values and interests in other countries. Additionally, the EU can use digital diplomacy to
strengthen its partnerships with other countries and organizations. The EU has a wide range of
partnerships with countries around the world, and digital diplomacy can be used to strengthen
these relationships and further cooperation on issues of mutual concern.

Another opportunity for the EU is to use digital diplomacy to promote economic growth and
innovation. The EU is a leader in the digital economy, and it can use digital diplomacy to
promote its economic interests and encourage other countries to adopt its digital policies and
standards. Additionally, the EU can use digital diplomacy to promote innovation and
entrepreneurship, which can help to create jobs and boost economic growth.

Finally, the EU can use digital diplomacy to address global challenges such as climate
change, migration, and terrorism. Digital diplomacy can be used to share information and best
practices on these issues, and to coordinate efforts to address them. The EU can also use
digital diplomacy to promote multilateral cooperation on these issues, which can help to
achieve more effective and sustainable solutions.

In conclusion, digitalization has brought both challenges and opportunities for the EU's digital
diplomacy. The EU faces challenges such as lack of a unified digital strategy and limited
resources and capacity. However, the EU also has the opportunity to use digital diplomacy to
promote its values and interests, strengthen partnerships, promote economic growth and
innovation, and address global challenges. The EU must address these challenges and take
advantage of these opportunities if it wants to be a leader in the digital age.

******************

write 10 hypothesis about "Digital Technologies and EU Foreign Policy: An Analysis of the
Institutional Framework."

The European Commission plays a central role in shaping the EU's digital diplomacy strategy
by ensuring consistency and coherence across different policy areas.

The European External Action Service has limited resources and capacity which can impede
the EU's ability to fully engage in digital diplomacy.

The lack of a unified digital strategy among EU member states can lead to a lack of
coordination and consistency in the EU's approach to digital diplomacy.

The EU's approach to digital diplomacy is shaped by its relationships with other actors and
institutions, such as international organizations and private sector actors.

The EU's efforts to address online disinformation have been met with resistance from some
member states and online platforms.

The EU's institutional framework for digital technologies and foreign policy includes several
different mechanisms for dialogue and coordination with the private sector.

The EU's approach to digital diplomacy is shifting towards a more holistic approach by
integrating digital considerations in all aspects of its external action.

The EU's new global strategy for foreign and security policy highlights the need to address
the challenges and opportunities of the digital age.

The EU's investment in digital technologies can support economic growth and development in
third countries.

The EU's partnerships with other countries and international organizations can promote digital
cooperation and share best practices in the field.

write 10 hypotheses about insufficiency of "Digital Technologies and EU Foreign Policy: An

Analysis of the Institutional Framework."
The European Commission does not have enough resources and capacity to effectively
coordinate the EU's digital diplomacy strategy.

The European External Action Service lacks the necessary authority to effectively implement
the EU's digital diplomacy strategy.

The EU's member states do not sufficiently coordinate their digital diplomacy strategies,
leading to a lack of consistency in the EU's approach.

The EU's relationships with other actors and institutions are not strong enough to effectively
shape its approach to digital diplomacy.

The EU's efforts to address online disinformation are insufficient and ineffective.

The EU's institutional framework for digital technologies and foreign policy does not provide
enough opportunities for dialogue and coordination with the private sector.

The EU's approach to digital diplomacy is not sufficiently holistic and does not adequately
integrate digital considerations in all aspects of its external action.

The EU's new global strategy for foreign and security policy does not sufficiently address the
challenges and opportunities of the digital age.

The EU's investment in digital technologies is insufficient to support economic growth and
development in third countries.

The EU's partnerships with other countries and international organizations are not sufficient to
promote digital cooperation and share best practices in the field.

write 10 hypotheses about limits of "Digital Technologies and EU Foreign Policy: An

Analysis of the Institutional Framework."

The European Commission's authority and resources are limited, which limits its ability to
effectively coordinate the EU's digital diplomacy strategy.

The European External Action Service's limited resources and capacity restrict its ability to
effectively implement the EU's digital diplomacy strategy.

The lack of coordination among EU member states' digital diplomacy strategies limit the EU's
ability to achieve consistency in its approach.

The EU's relationships with other actors and institutions may be constrained by legal and
political limitations, limiting its ability to shape its approach to digital diplomacy.

The EU's efforts to address online disinformation may be limited by a lack of regulatory
powers and legal frameworks.

The EU's institutional framework for digital technologies and foreign policy may be limited in
providing opportunities for dialogue and coordination with the private sector.
The EU's approach to digital diplomacy may be limited by a lack of integration of digital
considerations in all aspects of its external action.

The EU's new global strategy for foreign and security policy may be limited in addressing the
challenges and opportunities of the digital age.

The EU's investment in digital technologies may be limited by budget constraints, hindering
its ability to support economic growth and development in third countries.

The EU's partnerships with other countries and international organizations may be limited by
political and economic considerations, hindering its ability to promote digital cooperation and
share best practices in the field.

write 20 hypotheses to overcome the limits of "Digital Technologies and EU Foreign Policy:
An Analysis of the Institutional Framework."

Increasing the resources and capacity of the European Commission can improve its ability to
effectively coordinate the EU's digital diplomacy strategy.

Giving the European External Action Service more authority and resources can improve its
ability to effectively implement the EU's digital diplomacy strategy.

Establishing a unified digital strategy among EU member states can improve the EU's ability
to achieve consistency in its approach to digital diplomacy.

Strengthening the EU's relationships with other actors and institutions, such as international
organizations and private sector actors, can improve its ability to shape its approach to digital
diplomacy.

Developing a comprehensive legal framework to regulate online disinformation can improve

the EU's ability to address this challenge.

Providing more opportunities for dialogue and coordination with the private sector through
EU's institutional framework can enhance the cooperation with the private sector in the field
of digital technologies.

Adopting a more holistic approach to digital diplomacy by integrating digital considerations

in all aspects of its external action can improve the EU's approach.

Reviewing and strengthening the EU's new global strategy for foreign and security policy to
better address the challenges and opportunities of the digital age can improve the EU's ability
to navigate the digital age.

Increasing the EU's investment in digital technologies can improve its ability to support
economic growth and development in third countries.

Establishing more partnerships with other countries and international organizations can
improve the EU's ability to promote digital cooperation and share best practices in the field.
Creating a centralized platform for EU member states to share their digital diplomacy
strategies can improve coordination.

Involving the private sector in the EU's digital diplomacy strategy development process can
provide valuable insights and resources.

Increasing transparency and communication within the EU's institutional framework for
digital technologies and foreign policy can improve coordination and consistency.

Encouraging the EU member states to align their domestic digital policies with the EU's
overall digital diplomacy strategy can improve consistency.

Establishing a dedicated unit within the EU's external action service to focus on digital
diplomacy can improve the EU's ability to fully engage in digital diplomacy.

Creating an EU-wide system for monitoring and countering disinformation can enhance the
EU's efforts to address this challenge.

Offering training and resources to EU member states to improve their capacity for digital
diplomacy can enhance the EU's overall digital diplomacy efforts.

Building a network of digital diplomacy experts across the EU can provide valuable expertise
and resources to the EU's digital diplomacy efforts.

Encouraging cooperation and information sharing among EU member states on digital

technologies can help the EU stay ahead in the digital race.

Building more robust mechanisms for dispute resolution and crisis management in the field of
digital diplomacy can help the EU respond more effectively to challenges.

write a bibliography list about the lacks and limits of Digital Technologies and EU Foreign
Policy: An Analysis of the Institutional Framework."

the best theories to overcome the limits of "Digital Technologies and EU Foreign Policy: An
Analysis of the Institutional Framework."

Developing a comprehensive digital diplomacy strategy: The EU should develop a

comprehensive digital diplomacy strategy that takes into account the different policy areas
and actors involved. This would help to ensure consistency and coherence in the EU's
approach to digital diplomacy.

Enhancing the role and resources of the European External Action Service: The EU should
enhance the role and resources of the European External Action Service to improve its ability
to effectively implement the EU's digital diplomacy strategy. This could include increasing
the EEAS's budget, staff and mandate to better reflect the growing importance of digital
diplomacy.
Facilitating member states' coordination: The EU should facilitate coordination among
member states' digital diplomacy strategies to ensure consistency in the EU's approach. This
could involve creating a centralized platform for EU member states to share their digital
diplomacy strategies, and encouraging member states to align their domestic digital policies
with the EU's overall digital diplomacy strategy.

Strengthening the EU's relationships with other actors and institutions: The EU should
strengthen its relationships with other actors and institutions, such as international
organizations and private sector actors, to improve its ability to shape its approach to digital
diplomacy. This could include establishing partnerships and dialogues with these actors, and
involving them in the development of the EU's digital diplomacy strategy.

Addressing online disinformation: The EU should take a more proactive approach to

addressing online disinformation by developing a comprehensive legal framework to regulate
online disinformation, and creating a dedicated unit within the EU's external action service to
focus on digital diplomacy.

Encouraging cooperation and information sharing among EU member states: The EU should
encourage cooperation and information sharing among EU member states on digital
technologies to improve their capacity for digital diplomacy and stay ahead in the digital race.

Building more robust mechanisms for dispute resolution and crisis management: The EU
should build more robust mechanisms for dispute resolution and crisis management in the
field of digital diplomacy to help the EU respond more effectively to challenges. This could
include creating an EU-wide system for monitoring and countering disinformation.

Increasing transparency and communication within the EU's institutional framework: The EU
should increase transparency and communication within its institutional framework for digital
technologies and foreign policy to improve coordination and consistency.

Involving the private sector in the EU's digital diplomacy strategy development process: The
EU should involve the private sector in the development of its digital diplomacy strategy to
provide valuable insights and resources.

Offering training and resources to EU member states: The EU should offer training and
resources to EU member states to improve their capacity for digital diplomacy.

Building a network of digital diplomacy experts: The EU should build a network of digital
diplomacy experts across the EU to provide valuable expertise and resources to the EU's
digital diplomacy efforts.

Reviewing and updating EU's global strategy for foreign and security policy: The EU should
review and update its global strategy for foreign and security policy to better address the
challenges and opportunities of the digital age, by taking into account the impact of digital
technologies on foreign policy and security.
Increasing investment in digital technologies: The EU should increase investment in digital
technologies to support economic growth and development in third countries, and to foster
innovation and competitiveness in the digital sector.

Establishing more partnerships and dialogues with other countries and international
organizations: The EU should establish more partnerships and dialogues with other countries
and international organizations to promote digital cooperation and share best practices in the
field.

Strengthening EU's Cyber diplomacy: The EU should strengthen its Cyber diplomacy by
promoting cyber security, stability and building trust in cyberspace by fostering dialogue and
cooperation with other actors in the field.

Developing EU's digital diplomacy capacity: The EU should develop its digital diplomacy
capacity by providing training and resources to EU staff, and increasing the number of digital
diplomacy experts within the EU's external action service.

Enhancing EU's digital diplomacy messaging: The EU should enhance its digital diplomacy
messaging by developing a clear and consistent narrative on its digital diplomacy priorities,
and by leveraging social media and other digital platforms to communicate its message.

Establishing a dedicated EU digital diplomacy fund: The EU should establish a dedicated

digital diplomacy fund to support EU's digital diplomacy initiatives and projects.

Promoting digital literacy and digital rights: The EU should promote digital literacy and
digital rights in its digital diplomacy efforts, by supporting the development of digital skills
and by promoting respect for human rights online.

Creating a EU-wide digital diplomacy monitoring system: The EU should create a EU-wide
digital diplomacy monitoring system to track the impact of its digital diplomacy efforts, and
to identify areas where improvements can be made.

consider the lacks and limits of "Digital Technologies and EU Foreign Policy: An Analysis of
the Institutional Framework." and write a detailed contribution

The EU's institutional framework for digital technologies and foreign policy is complex and
multifaceted, comprising of several different actors and institutions. Despite its efforts to
leverage digital technologies to further its foreign policy goals, there are several lacks and
limits that hinder the EU's ability to fully engage in digital diplomacy.

One major limit of the EU's institutional framework for digital technologies and foreign
policy is the lack of a unified digital strategy among EU member states. This lack of
coordination and consistency in the EU's approach to digital diplomacy can lead to a
fragmented and ineffective response to digital challenges. Additionally, the European
External Action Service (EEAS) has limited resources and capacity which can impede the
EU's ability to fully engage in digital diplomacy. The EEAS has a limited budget, staff and
mandate which do not fully reflect the growing importance of digital diplomacy.
Another limit of the EU's institutional framework is the issue of online disinformation.
Despite the EU's efforts to address online disinformation, these efforts have been met with
resistance from some member states and online platforms. The EU lacks the necessary
regulatory powers and legal frameworks to effectively address this challenge.

Furthermore, the EU's institutional framework for digital technologies and foreign policy has
limited opportunities for dialogue and coordination with the private sector. The EU's
partnerships with private sector actors, such as the EU-US Privacy Shield and the EU-China
Cybersecurity Cooperation Mechanism, have been established to promote cooperation and
addressing common challenges in the field of digital technologies. But, the EU could provide
more opportunities for dialogue and coordination with the private sector to enhance
cooperation and to keep the private sector informed about the EU's digital diplomacy
initiatives and projects.

Lastly, the EU's approach to digital diplomacy is not sufficiently holistic and does not
adequately integrate digital considerations in all aspects of its external action. The EU's new
global strategy for foreign and security policy does not sufficiently address the challenges and
opportunities of the digital age, and the EU's investment in digital technologies is often
limited by budget constraints.

In conclusion, the EU's institutional framework for digital technologies and foreign policy
faces several limitations that hinder its ability to fully engage in digital diplomacy. To
overcome these limits, the EU should develop a comprehensive digital diplomacy strategy,
enhance the role and resources of the EEAS, facilitate member states' coordination, strengthen
its relationships with other actors and institutions, develop a comprehensive legal framework
to regulate online disinformation, provide more opportunities for dialogue and coordination
with the private sector, adopt a more holistic approach to digital diplomacy and increase
investment in digital technologies.

a detailed contribution considering the lacks and limits of Digital Technologies and EU
Foreign Policy: An Analysis of the Institutional Framework."

The EU's institutional framework for digital technologies and foreign policy is a complex and
multifaceted system that includes several different actors and institutions. Despite the EU's
efforts to leverage digital technologies to further its foreign policy goals, there are several
lacks and limitations that hinder the EU's ability to fully engage in digital diplomacy.

One major limitation is the lack of a unified digital strategy among EU member states. This
lack of coordination and consistency in the EU's approach to digital diplomacy can lead to a
fragmented and ineffective response to digital challenges. Additionally, the European
External Action Service (EEAS) has limited resources and capacity which can impede the
EU's ability to fully engage in digital diplomacy. The EEAS has a limited budget, staff, and
mandate which do not fully reflect the growing importance of digital diplomacy.

Another limitation is the issue of online disinformation. Despite the EU

if I write a phd thesis about the lacks and limits of Digital Technologies and EU Foreign
Policy: An Analysis of the Institutional Framework", what contribution can I make to the
literature?

If you were to write a PhD thesis about the lacks and limits of Digital Technologies and EU
Foreign Policy: An Analysis of the Institutional Framework, you could contribute to the
literature by providing a comprehensive and in-depth analysis of the EU's institutional
framework for digital technologies and foreign policy. Your thesis could explore the various
actors and institutions involved in the EU's approach to digital diplomacy, and examine the
challenges and limitations that the EU faces in fully engaging in digital diplomacy.

One potential contribution could be to provide a detailed analysis of the lack of a unified
digital strategy among EU member states, and the impact this has on the EU's ability to
achieve consistency in its approach to digital diplomacy. Additionally, you could provide an
assessment of the resources and capacity of the European External Action Service, and its role
in implementing the EU's digital diplomacy strategy.

Another potential contribution could be to examine the EU's efforts to address online
disinformation, and the limitations of these efforts. This could include an analysis of the legal
and regulatory frameworks in place to address online disinformation, as well as an assessment
of the EU's partnerships with private sector actors in this area.

Additionally, you could study the EU's institutional framework for digital technologies and
foreign policy and the opportunities for dialogue and coordination with the private sector.
Your thesis could also analyze the EU's approach to digital diplomacy, and its ability to
integrate digital considerations in all aspects of its external action.

Furthermore, you could propose recommendations and best practices that the EU could adopt
to overcome the lacks and limitations that hinder its ability to fully engage in digital
diplomacy. This could include suggestions on how to develop a comprehensive digital
diplomacy strategy, how to enhance the role and resources of the EEAS, how to facilitate
member states' coordination, how to strengthen relationships with other actors and
institutions, how to develop a comprehensive legal framework to regulate online
disinformation, how to provide more opportunities for dialogue and coordination with the
private sector, and how to adopt a more holistic approach to digital diplomacy.

In summary, your thesis could provide a comprehensive and in-depth analysis of the EU's
institutional framework for digital technologies and foreign policy, and contribute to the
literature by highlighting the challenges and limitations that the EU faces in fully engaging in
digital diplomacy, and offering recommendations on how to overcome these

limitations. Additionally, your thesis could contribute to the literature by providing a detailed
examination of the EU's efforts to address online disinformation and the limitations of these
efforts, and by offering recommendations on how to improve the EU's approach to addressing
this challenge. Furthermore, your thesis could contribute to the literature by providing an
analysis of the EU's institutional framework for digital technologies and foreign policy and
the opportunities for dialogue and coordination with the private sector and recommendations
on how to improve these relationships.

Another way that your thesis could contribute to the literature is by providing a comparative
analysis of the EU's institutional framework for digital technologies and foreign policy in
comparison to other countries and international organizations. This could include an
examination of how other countries and organizations approach digital diplomacy and the
challenges they face, and an assessment of how the EU's framework compares to these other
approaches.

Furthermore, you could also suggest ways to improve the EU's investment in digital
technologies and how it can foster innovation and competitiveness in the digital sector, as
well as ways to enhance EU's Cyber diplomacy and building trust in cyberspace by fostering
dialogue and cooperation with other actors in the field.

In addition to this, your thesis could contribute to the literature by providing an in-depth
analysis of the EU's approach to digital diplomacy messaging and the use of social media and
other digital platforms to communicate its message and the impact of this approach on its
digital diplomacy efforts.

Finally, your thesis could provide a detailed examination of the EU's approach to digital
diplomacy capacity building and the provision of training and resources to EU staff, and the
impact of this approach on the EU's digital diplomacy efforts.

Overall, your thesis could contribute to the literature by providing a comprehensive and in-
depth analysis of the EU's institutional framework for digital technologies and foreign policy,
highlighting the challenges and limitations that the EU faces in fully engaging in digital
diplomacy, and offering recommendations on how to overcome these limitations.

if I were to write a phd thesis about Digital Technologies and EU Foreign Policy: An Analysis
of the Institutional Framework", what contribution can I make to the literature?

An Analysis of the Institutional Framework, the thesis aims to contribute to the literature by
providing a detailed and in-depth examination of the EU's institutional framework for digital
technologies and foreign policy. The thesis could delve into the various actors and institutions
involved in the EU's approach to digital diplomacy, and provide an analysis of the challenges
and limitations that the EU faces in fully engaging in digital diplomacy.

One potential contribution could be providing a comprehensive analysis of the EU's digital
diplomacy strategy and its effectiveness in achieving consistency and coherence in the EU's
approach to digital diplomacy. Additionally, it will examine the role and resources of the
European External Action Service (EEAS) in implementing the EU's digital diplomacy
strategy and assess its capacity to fully engage in digital diplomacy.

Another potential contribution could be to study the EU's efforts to address online
disinformation and the limitations of these efforts. This could include an analysis of the legal
and regulatory frameworks in place to address online disinformation, as well as an assessment
of the EU's partnerships with private sector actors in this area.

Additionally, one of the main objectives is also to examine the EU's institutional framework
for digital technologies and foreign policy, and the opportunities for dialogue and
coordination with the private sector, and suggest ways to improve these relationships.

Furthermore, it will provide a comparative analysis of the EU's institutional framework for
digital technologies and foreign policy in comparison to other countries and international
organizations. This could include an examination of how other countries and organizations
approach digital diplomacy and the challenges they face, and an assessment of how the EU's
framework compares to these other approaches. Moreover, it could provide recommendations
on how to improve the EU's investment in digital technologies and how it can foster
innovation and competitiveness in the digital sector, as well as ways to enhance EU's Cyber
diplomacy and building trust in cyberspace by fostering dialogue and cooperation with other
actors in the field.

Another way the thesis could contribute to the literature is by providing an in-depth analysis
of the EU's approach to digital diplomacy messaging, and the use of social media and other
digital platforms to communicate its message. It will as well assess the effectiveness of this
approach and the impact it has had on the EU's digital diplomacy efforts.

Furthermore, it could contribute to the literature by providing an analysis of the EU's

approach to digital diplomacy capacity building and the provision of training and resources to
EU staff, and the impact of this approach on the EU's digital diplomacy efforts. Moreover, it
could provide a more detailed examination of the EU's approach to digital literacy and digital
rights in its digital diplomacy efforts, by assessing the impact of EU's support for the
development of digital skills and promotion of human rights online, and suggest ways to
improve these efforts. Additionally, the thesis could explore the role of Artificial Intelligence
in EU's digital diplomacy, and the ways in which AI can be utilized to enhance the EU's
digital diplomacy efforts.

Overall, the thesis could contribute to the literature by providing a comprehensive and in-
depth analysis of the EU's institutional framework for digital technologies and foreign policy,
highlighting the challenges and limitations that the EU faces in fully engaging in digital
diplomacy, and offering recommendations on how to overcome these limitations. It could also
provide insights on best practices and new trends that the EU should consider in its digital
diplomacy strategy.

if I write a phd thesis about the lacks and limits of Digital Technologies and EU Foreign
Policy: An Analysis of the Institutional Framework", which EU theories and methodologhy
would best fit?

If you were to write a PhD thesis about the lacks and limits of Digital Technologies and EU
Foreign Policy: An Analysis of the Institutional Framework, there are several EU theories and
methodologies that would best fit your analysis.
One theory that would be particularly relevant is the multi-level governance theory, which
emphasizes the role of different levels of government, including supranational, national, and
sub-national levels, in EU policy-making. This theory would be useful in analyzing the EU's
institutional framework for digital technologies and foreign policy, and how different actors
and institutions at different levels of government interact and coordinate in the EU's approach
to digital diplomacy.

Another theory that could be useful in your analysis is the neoliberal intergovernmentalism
theory, which emphasizes the role of member state governments in EU decision-making, and
the role of economic considerations in EU policy-making. This theory would be useful in
analyzing the EU's approach to digital diplomacy, and the impact of economic considerations
on the EU's ability to fully engage in digital diplomacy.

Another methodology that could be useful in your analysis is comparative analysis, which
involves comparing the EU's institutional framework for digital technologies and foreign
policy with other countries and international organizations. This methodology would be
useful in assessing the EU's approach to digital diplomacy in comparison to other countries
and organizations, and in identifying best practices and areas for improvement.

Moreover, you could use a constructivist approach to examine how EU's digital diplomacy is
shaped by norms and ideas and how these norms and ideas change over time. This approach
could provide insight into the EU's approach to digital diplomacy and how it has evolved over
time.

Additionally, you could also use a critical approach to examine the EU's digital diplomacy
and the ways in which it reflects the EU's larger foreign policy goals and interests.

Overall, the multi-level governance theory, the neoliberal intergovernmentalism theory,

comparative analysis, constructivist and critical approach could be useful in understanding the
EU's institutional framework for digital technologies and foreign policy and the challenges
and limitations that the EU faces in fully engaging in digital diplomacy.

the purposes of the research about limits of "Digital Technologies and EU Foreign Policy: An
Analysis of the Institutional Framework."

The purpose of research on the limits of digital technologies and EU foreign policy is to
analyze the institutional framework for the use of digital technologies in EU foreign policy.
This may include studying the current policies and regulations in place for the use of digital
technologies in diplomacy and international relations, as well as identifying any potential
challenges or limitations to the effective use of these technologies. The research may also aim
to make recommendations for how to address these limitations and optimize the use of digital
technologies in EU foreign policy.

Considering the limits according to the multi-level governance theory

According to the multi-level governance theory, one of the main limits of using digital
technologies in EU foreign policy is the lack of coordination and cooperation among different
levels of government and actors. The EU is a complex system of governance, with multiple
levels and actors involved in decision-making, including the European Commission, member
states, and various non-state actors. This can lead to a lack of consensus and coordination
among these actors, making it difficult to effectively implement digital technologies in EU
foreign policy.

Another limitation is the lack of legal and regulatory framework for the use of digital
technologies in EU foreign policy. The EU has yet to establish a clear legal framework for the
use of digital technologies in diplomacy and international relations, which can limit their use
and effectiveness. This can be a problem as some member states may have different
regulations or lack of regulations regarding the use of digital technologies.

Furthermore, the multi-level governance theory highlights the importance of the participation
of citizens and civil society in the EU's decision-making process. However, the use of digital
technologies in EU foreign policy may not always take into account the views and opinions of
citizens and civil society, which can limit the legitimacy and effectiveness of these
technologies.

In summary, according to the multi-level governance theory, the main limits of using digital
technologies in EU foreign policy are the lack of coordination and cooperation among
different levels of government and actors, the lack of legal and regulatory framework and the
lack of citizen participation.

Considering the limits according to the neoliberal intergovernmentalism theory

According to the neoliberal intergovernmentalism theory, one of the main limits of using
digital technologies in EU foreign policy is the dominance of member state interests over EU-
level interests. This theory posits that EU decision-making is primarily driven by the
bargaining and negotiation of member states, and that EU-level institutions and policies are
secondary to the interests of member states. In the context of digital technologies and EU
foreign policy, this could mean that member states may prioritize their own national interests
and regulations over EU-wide coordination and cooperation on digital technologies.

Another limitation is the lack of a strong EU-level institution or actor to drive the integration
and coordination of digital technologies in EU foreign policy. Neoliberal
intergovernmentalism theory emphasizes the importance of strong EU-level institutions in
driving integration and cooperation, but in the case of digital technologies in EU foreign
policy, there may not be a clear leader or institution driving this process.

Additionally, the use of digital technologies in EU foreign policy may also be limited by the
limited financial resources of EU-level institutions. The theory of neoliberal
intergovernmentalism emphasizes the importance of budget constraints and the limited
financial resources of EU-level institutions, which could limit the ability of these institutions
to invest in and implement digital technologies in EU foreign policy.

In summary, according to the neoliberal intergovernmentalism theory, the main limits of

using digital technologies in EU foreign policy are the dominance of member state interests
over EU-level interests, the lack of strong EU-level institution or actor to drive the integration
and coordination of digital technologies and the limited financial resources of EU-level
institutions.

Considering the limits according to the Neoliberal Intergovernmentalism Theory

According to the Neoliberal Intergovernmentalism theory, the use of digital technologies in

EU foreign policy is subject to the balancing of national and EU-level interests. This theory
posits that EU member states tend to prioritize their own national interests and sovereignty
over EU-level integration and cooperation. This can limit the ability of the EU to fully utilize
digital technologies in foreign policy because member states may be reluctant to cede control
over certain areas, such as data privacy and security, to EU-level institutions.

Another limitation is the lack of strong EU-level institutions or actors capable of driving the
integration and coordination of digital technologies in foreign policy. Neoliberal
Intergovernmentalism theory emphasizes the role of member states in decision-making, and
EU-level institutions are secondary in this process. Therefore, there may not be a clear leader
or institution to drive the integration and coordination of digital technologies in EU foreign
policy.

Additionally, the limited financial resources of EU-level institutions can also limit the ability
of the EU to invest in and implement digital technologies in foreign policy. Neoliberal
intergovernmentalism theory focuses on budget constraints and the limited financial resources
of EU-level institutions, which can hinder their ability to invest in digital technologies and
other related initiatives.

In summary, according to the Neoliberal Intergovernmentalism theory, the main limits of

using digital technologies in EU foreign policy are the balancing of national and EU-level
interests, the lack of strong EU-level institutions or actors capable of driving the integration
and coordination of digital technologies, and the limited financial resources of EU-level
institutions.

write about the Neoliberal Intergovernmentalism Theory and "Digital Technologies and EU
Foreign Policy: An Analysis of the Institutional Framework."

The Neoliberal Intergovernmentalism theory can help to understand the limits of using digital
technologies in EU foreign policy by analyzing the relationship between member states and
EU-level institutions. According to this theory, EU member states tend to prioritize their own
national interests and sovereignty over EU-level integration and cooperation. This can limit
the ability of the EU to fully utilize digital technologies in foreign policy as member states
may be reluctant to cede control over certain areas, such as data privacy and security, to EU-
level institutions.

Another limitation of using digital technologies in EU foreign policy according to this theory
is the lack of strong EU-level institutions or actors capable of driving the integration and
coordination of digital technologies. Neoliberal intergovernmentalism theory emphasizes the
role of member states in decision-making, and EU-level institutions are secondary in this
process. Therefore, there may not be a clear leader or institution to drive the integration and
coordination of digital technologies in EU foreign policy.

Furthermore, the limited financial resources of EU-level institutions can also limit the ability
of the EU to invest in and implement digital technologies in foreign policy. The theory of
neoliberal intergovernmentalism focuses on budget constraints and the limited financial
resources of EU-level institutions, which can hinder their ability to invest in digital
technologies and other related initiatives.

In summary, according to the Neoliberal Intergovernmentalism theory, the main limits of

using digital technologies in EU foreign policy are the balancing of national and EU-level
interests, the lack of strong EU-level institutions or actors capable of driving the integration
and coordination of digital technologies, and the limited financial resources of EU-level
institutions. This analysis can provide insights for policymakers to understand the challenges
and limitations of using digital technologies in EU foreign policy and how to overcome them.

The proposed thesis title, "The EU's Digital Diplomacy: A Study of Digital
Institutionalization in EU Foreign Policy - Challenges and Opportunities" is specific and
informative. It clearly states the topic of the thesis, the focus of the study, and the main
arguments that will be examined. It is a strong title for a PhD thesis.