Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 40

Traumatic exposure, Post traumatic stress disorder and Post traumatic growth/resilience among

Refugees in Uganda

Apendi Martha Amelia

2022/HDO3/2802U

A research proposal in partial fulfillment for the Master's degree in Clinical psychology

January 2023
ii

Table of contents
Chapter one......................................................................................................................................3

Background..................................................................................................................................3

Statement of the problem.............................................................................................................2

Purpose of the study.....................................................................................................................3

Objective......................................................................................................................................3

Significance..................................................................................................................................3

Scope of the study........................................................................................................................4

Conceptual Framework................................................................................................................5

Theoretical framework.................................................................................................................5

Chapter two......................................................................................................................................7

Traumatic exposure......................................................................................................................7

Posttraumatic stress disorder........................................................................................................8

Post traumatic growth/Resilience.................................................................................................8

Traumatic exposure and Post traumatic growth...........................................................................9

Traumatic exposure and Post traumatic stress disorder.............................................................10

Post-traumatic stress disorder and Post traumatic growth/resilience.........................................11

Hypothesis..................................................................................................................................11

Chapter Three................................................................................................................................12

Methods.........................................................................................................................................12

Study design...............................................................................................................................12

Sample design/Sampling technique...........................................................................................12

Instruments and measures..........................................................................................................12

Post traumatic diagnostic scale (PDS – 5).................................................................................13

Post-Traumatic Growth Inventory (PTGI)/ Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale -10 (CD-RISC -


10)..............................................................................................................................................13

ii
iii

Procedure and ethical considerations.........................................................................................14

Institutional Review Board (IRB)..............................................................................................14

Consent forms............................................................................................................................14

Confidentiality...........................................................................................................................14

Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) for COVID 19 and Ebola............................................15

Data management.......................................................................................................................15

Post traumatic diagnostic scale (PDS – 5).................................................................................15

Post Traumatic Growth Inventory (PTGI)/ Connor Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC-10)
....................................................................................................................................................15

Data analysis..............................................................................................................................16

References......................................................................................................................................17

Appendix........................................................................................................................................21

Work plan/time schedule...........................................................................................................21

Budget........................................................................................................................................21

Instruments.................................................................................................................................21

iii
iv

Chapter one

Background

A rising number of refugees are residing in Uganda. Uganda hosts the largest refugee

population in Africa and gets the third-highest number of refugees worldwide, behind Turkey

and Pakistan (Bohnet & Schmitz-Pranghe, 2019). Beginning in 2022, Uganda was the biggest

nation on the continent of Africa and one of the most well-known countries that hosted refugees,

housing roughly 1.5 million refugees. (Uganda Population Statistics Dashboard - November,

n.d.) with many of them fleeing from their countries of origin such as Congo, South Sudan,

Somalia due to war, violence and other unforeseeable difficult experiences. Evidence from a

2009 study by Onyut et al. among the Democratic republic of Congo (DRC) refugees in the

Nakivale Refugee Settlement in Uganda supports the claim that many of the refugees from the

DRC experience or witness various traumatic events. They discovered that 73 % of their

respondents said they had seen dead or dismembered bodies, 69.3% had seen bomb or shelling

attacks, 67.7 % had seen someone get hurt using a weapon, 60.3% had seen crossfire or sniper

attacks, and 60.2% had seen burning houses all these events were extremely distressing and had

a profound impact on a their wellbeing (Ainamani et al., 2016). Posttraumatic stress disorder

(PTSD) is a significant contributor to the global disease burden, affecting nearly 4% of the

world's population. (Ng et al., 2020). These PTSD rates ranged between 13% and 25%, which is

roughly comparable to the World Health Organization's estimate of 20% for the median

prevalence of mental disorder in societies exposed to humanitarian emergencies (Steel et al.,

2020). With a lot of research being documented on the negative impacts of the traumatic

experiences little is still known on Post traumatic growth (PTG). PTG develops after a traumatic

experience and during the struggle to find a new normal, while resilience involves the capacity to

iv
v

deal with negative emotions that come from a stressful experience and function at or near normal

levels (maintain a stable equilibrium) (Greup et al., 2018). Resilience and PTG can both be

thought of as processes and results, but the terms shouldn't be used interchangeably. Adversity

and positive adaptation are two crucial concepts that often result in resilience (Yuan et al., 2018).

Thus where resilience involves a specific construct of one’s ability to cope and adjust in difficult

situations, PTG involves a general and broader sense of well-being. In the trauma field, the

realization that not everyone exposed to potentially traumatic events developed psychopathology

prompted a paradigm shift to focus on the various positive and negative pathways in the

aftermath of trauma (Ssenyonga et al., 2013). Empirical research demonstrates that after a

traumatic event, an individual may as well experience positive changes, including a greater

appreciation of life, the strengthening of close relationships, the recognition and elaboration of

one's own strengths, the recognition of new opportunities, and spiritual growth (Măirean, 2016).

Statement of the problem

Due to the unique challenges that refugees confront that other groups do not, the

available research does not fully depict the specific PTG/resilience profile of refugees. (Chan et

al., 2016). Even though distressing or traumatic experiences can leave survivors with lasting

psychological symptoms of PTSD, many of them may only go through minor setbacks or even

come out stronger. After a traumatic exposure, they may report a new and healthier lifestyle, an

increase in spiritual interest, increased maturity and improved social relationships, which are

indicators of PTG/resilience (Kılıç et al., 2016). By understanding the factors that can influence

an individuals' response to trauma, it is possible to develop more effective interventions and

support systems for those who are at risk of developing negative outcomes following a traumatic

event.

v
vi

Purpose of the study

The purpose of the study is to determine the relationship between traumatic exposure,

post traumatic stress disorder and post traumatic growth/resilience among refugees in Uganda.

Objective

To find out the relationship between traumatic exposure and post traumatic

growth/resilience among refugees

To identify the relationship between traumatic exposure and post traumatic stress

disorder among refugees.

To examine the relationship between post traumatic stress disorder and post traumatic

growth/resilience.

To establish the mediating/moderating role of resilience in the relationship between

traumatic exposure and post traumatic growth/PTSD

Significance

The study may help Non-Government Organizations (NGOs) and Community Based

Organizations (CBOs) to identify the factors underlying Post Traumatic Growth hence develop

programs to prevent the negative aftermaths faced by refugees after being exposed to traumatic

events.

This study may help the government address the concerns of refugees and give priority to

their mental health after resettlement with the help of the findings from this research.

vi
vii

Since a copy of this research may be kept in the university library and other academic

reading sites this study may be used as a reference manual by students and academicians

interested in the study.

This study may help respondents gain more information and understanding of the

traumatic experiences and the influence on their lives especially during their participation.

Scope of the study

This study will focus on rural refugees who are adult males and females (18– 35 years)

living in Kyaka refugee settlement in Kyegegwa district. It’s one of the refugee settlements with

the highest number of refugees in Uganda, hosts refugees from Democratic republic of Congo

(DRC) with recent conflicts in the nearby countries increasing new arrivals per day.

Traumatic exposure refers to the experience of a traumatic event which is defined as

exposure to “actual or threatened death, serious injury or sexual violence” which can happen

directly to a person, indirectly through witnessing or learning about a loved one experiencing a

traumatic event, or repeatedly being exposed to traumatic events that have happened to others

(Degenhardt et al., 2022). PTSD is a mental illness that may arise from exposure to exceptionally

terrifying or threatening events; it can happen as a result of a single traumatic event or from

repeated trauma exposure (Bisson et al., 2015). PTG is defined as the experience of positive

psychological change as a result of the struggle with highly challenging life circumstances

(Tedeschi & Calhoun, 2004). It should be noted that PTG isn’t just the absence of negative

emotion or difficulties but the presence of positive psychological change in spite of those

challenges. Resilience is the ability to withstand or tolerate adversity without experiencing

lasting negative effects (Tedeschi et al., 2018).

vii
viii

Conceptual Framework

Resilience
Social support PTG /PTSD
Facing failure Appreciation of life
Traumatic Increased Sense of personal
exposure Meaning in life
growth
War related Meaningful relationships
exposure
Violence
exposure Social support
(physical and Flash backs
sexual) Nightmares
Uncontrollable thoughts

Figure 1

A conceptual framework showing the relationship between Traumatic exposure, Resilience

and Post traumatic growth/Post traumatic stress disorder among Refugees.

This conceptual frame work suggest that Traumatic exposure can lead to the development

of PTSD in some individuals but it can also lead to positive psychological changes and growth

which is PTG/Resilience in others, however it also explains that some refugees can develop

PTSD and still adapt and grow through their negative experiences. It is important to note that

note all refugees who experience a traumatic event will develop PTSD and not all refugees who

experience a traumatic event will develop PTG/resilience.

Theoretical framework: Cognitive adaptation theory

Humans deal with hazards in their life, according to the Theory of Cognitive Adaptation,

by creating a sequence of optimistic illusions that protect their psychological health (Taylor,

1983). Positively tilted cognitions are not considered delusory or erroneous, but rather a sign of

mental health because they allow for hope, personal growth, and adaptability.

viii
ix

Based on the cognitive adaptation theory, traumatic events challenge people's ideas about

the self and the environment. The adjustment process, it is said, revolves around three themes: a

search for meaning in the experience, an endeavor to reclaim power over the event in particular

and over life in general, and an attempt to restore self-esteem through self-enhancing

appraisals(Czajkowska, 2017). Therefore, according to cognitive adaptation theory, resilient

people are those who can maintain strong self-esteem, personal control, and optimism in the

midst of adversity and trauma.

Furthermore the cognitive adaptation theory asserts that when components of the

cognitive adaptable index, such as optimism, mastery, and self-esteem, are increased, both global

and particular PTSD symptoms are reduced (Schwabish, 2011).

However, the cognitive adaptation theory has been challenged for focusing on illusions

about the good nature of the event or effects, rather than what happens when the illusions are

incorrect. Because people can achieve a goal or hold a belief in various ways, the idea is said to

have less impact than intended. (Taylor, 1983).

Chapter two

This section discusses the review of different literature on the relationship between

traumatic exposure, post traumatic stress disorder and post traumatic growth among/resilience

refugees. It majorly has six sections namely; traumatic exposure, post traumatic stress disorder,

post traumatic growth/resilience, traumatic exposure and post traumatic growth/resilience,

traumatic exposure and post-traumatic stress disorder and post traumatic stress disorder and post

traumatic growth/resilience.

Traumatic exposure

ix
x

Almost 80 million people are currently forcibly displaced worldwide, including 26

million refugees. These forcibly displaced individuals fled to various nations in search of safety.

Their journey has been influenced by numerous factors. Particularly, due to persecution, war,

and/or violence, refugees and asylum seekers flee their country, and many of them experience

torture and trauma (Ziersch et al., 2020). During their journey from their home to their new

country of residence, refugees are frequently exposed to violence at various points, which can

cause physical or mental health issues that negatively impact their psychosocial adjustment.

(Scoglio & Salhi, 2021). Approximately 28 to 90 percent of people in developed countries,

according to studies of the general population, report having experienced at least one Traumatic

event in their lifetime. The most common occurrences are unexpected loss of a loved one, auto

accidents, and muggings. Unsurprisingly, the authors discovered that men and women report

different types of events; men report more injuries, accidents, and physical assault, while women

report more sexual assault (Benjet et al., 2016). While war and armed conflict cases are on the

rise, contributing to the high disease burden we see today. People who live in conflict zones

however endure ongoing violence as well as poverty, limited access to healthcare, and food

insecurity (Mesa-Vieira et al., 2022). These experiences are not only encountered during pre-

migration that is during their flight but refugees share experiencing them even after resettlement.

Posttraumatic stress disorder

According to research, psychological disorders are more common in refugee populations

than in the general population. Studies show that refugees not only frequently encounter a wide

variety of potentially traumatic experiences in their home countries and during displacement, but

that these experiences are also frequently repeated and have a lasting impact (Li et al., 2016).

These experiences can include physical and sexual violence, loss of loved ones, forced

x
xi

displacement and exposure to war and conflict. Approximately 3% of adult population suffers

from PTSD at any given time. Lifetime prevalence ranges from 1.9 percent to 8.8 percent, but in

areas affected by conflict, this rate doubles and rises to more than 50 percent among rape

survivors.(Bisson et al., 2015) . This demonstrates that the prevalence of PTSD can vary

depending on a range of variables, such as the kind of trauma experienced and the population

being studied. Thus these studies show that many people who experience trauma are able to not

only cope with the challenges they face, but also use those challenges as an opportunity for

personal growth and development.

Post traumatic growth/Resilience

Although a lot of research has concentrated on the negative effects of trauma and on

coping mechanisms for stressful life events like loss or suffering, since the 1990s, there has been

a lot of attention paid to the potential for experiencing positive psychological changes after

exposure to extremely difficult life circumstances (Shamia et al., 2015). The psychological

upheaval that follows a trauma leads to post-traumatic growth. Following an experience, the

mind goes through a cognitive process that produces useful processing, which in turn results in

growth. Each person experiences severely stressful events differently afterward (Naik & Khan,

2019). Although some people show negative decline and others report no change, many people

report positive growth following adversity (Naik & Khan, 2019) . Despite being comparable

since they are both regarded to be outcome processes, post-traumatic growth and resilience are

also highly dissimilar. In contrast to PTG, which prevents a return to baseline functioning,

resilience is the ability to withstand or tolerate adversity without experiencing lasting negative

effects (Tedeschi et al., 2018). Resilience may be understood as a personal trait. The more

resilient a person is, the less likely someone is expected to experience cognitive struggle, so he or

xi
xii

she may be less likely to experience profound transformational changes such as PTG (Tedeschi

et al., 2018). Furthermore, the available research indicates that resilience to violent and life-

threatening situations is rather widespread and that more than three-quarters of people who

experience trauma are resilient (Lee et al., 2020). This realization then proves the need for this

research to rule out the similarity and difference of resilience and Post traumatic growth among

the refugee population to also rule out the meaning of Post traumatic growth among the refugee

population in Uganda.

Traumatic exposure and Post traumatic growth

Findings reveal that shared traumas that target a community or group of individuals lead

to more PTG than man-made traumas that target an individual. .(Abraham et al., 2018). This may

be because individual who experience shared traumatic experiences may feel a sense of

belonging and support from their community which can aid in the healing process and facilitate

growth. However, it’s important to note that there can be other factors that can facilitate an

individual’s ability to develop PTG and its possible for an individual to develop PTG from

individual traumatic experiences as well. Recent research suggests that many survivors of

traumatic events, in addition to experiencing the symptoms of posttraumatic stress, report

positive changes in their lives as a result of facing trauma (Hussain & Bhushan, 2013). These

positive psychological changes which include a greater appreciation of life, improved

relationships a sense of personal strength and a greater spiritual understanding have been related

to PTG. However, it’s important to note that PTG is a complex phenomenon not everyone

exposed to traumatic events will experience PTG and that traumatic events can have different

impacts on people hence making it personal event.

Traumatic exposure and Post traumatic stress disorder

xii
xiii

In terms of deaths, injuries, and long-term effects, war, armed conflict, political unrest, and other

forms of organized violence account for a sizable portion of the global burden of disease (Mesa-

Vieira et al., 2022) with different mental health problems such as anxiety depression and PTSD

as the most common conditions. Research has been done on the refugee population resettled in

the Ugandan refugee settlements in Africa who have been exposed to traumatic experiences

which show that in northern Uganda, PTSD was discovered in 46% of Sudanese refugees and

18% of Ugandan citizens. Among Somali community refugees, it was also discovered that 32%

of adults suffer from PTSD (Bapolisi et al., 2020), according to two previous studies in the

Nakivale refugee settlement, In the first study, PTSD prevalence was found to be 61% among

Congolese, and in the second, it was found to be 32 and 48.1% among Rwandan and Somali

refugees (Ssenyonga et al., 2013). Although there is still a lot of material on PTSD as a result of

traumatic exposure, it should also be taken into consideration that the body of knowledge on

posttraumatic growth (PTG) is expanding, and a focus of attention is shifting to the contradictory

findings in the literature on the symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and PTG (Liu

et al., 2017).  

Post-traumatic stress disorder and Post traumatic growth/resilience

The connection between PTG and PTSD is a subject of debate. According to studies, the

degree of the traumatic experience is correlated with PTG, and veterans and former prisoners of

war with PTSD reported higher levels of PTG than those without PTSD (Cengiz et al., 2018).

Furthermore, Increased exposure to traumatic events and the amount of time that passed after the

traumatic events affected the level of PTG, according to the findings of a study among

psychiatric outpatients with immigrant backgrounds, while PTG is not linked to PTSD, a

different study found that the two coexist (Cengiz et al., 2018). Refugees are significantly more

xiii
xiv

likely to experience psychological distress due to their exposure to traumatic life experiences that

occurred prior to, during, and after their flight. However, not everyone who experiences

traumatic life events exhibits psychological anguish, PTSD, or other symptoms due to protective

factors such as resilience, social support and mean making in life the authors argued that resilient

people experience temporarily elevated distress when an adverse event happens but their distress

declines over time reflecting their normal variation in mood, distress, and functioning (Tekie,

2018).

Hypothesis

The aims to test the following hypothesis;

There is a significant relationship between traumatic exposure and post traumatic

growth/resilience

There is a significant relationship between traumatic exposure and post traumatic stress

disorder

There is a significant relationship between post traumatic stress disorder and post

traumatic growth/resilience

Post traumatic stress disorder significantly mediates the relationship between traumatic

exposure and post traumatic growth/resilience.

Chapter Three

Methods

This chapter focuses on the methodological aspects which include the study design, study

population and setting, sample size and sampling techniques, instruments and measures,

procedure and ethical considerations, data management and data analysis.

xiv
xv

Study design

The research will be quantitative in nature, use a cross sectional study and implore a

correlation study design to ascertain the relationship between traumatic exposure, post-traumatic

stress disorder, and post-traumatic growth/resilience. Studies that examine relationships between

variables and the outcome of interest are known as correlational studies. Furthermore, those

conducted all at once or over a brief period of time are cross sectional studies (Levin, 2006).

Study population and setting

The study sample will comprise of adults in Kyaka refugee settlement in Kyegegwa district.

Sample size and sampling techniques

A total sample size of 566 refugees will be targeted using G power with Correlation ρ

H1: .143, α err prob: .01, Power (1 – β err prob): .8, Correlation ρ H0: 0. The respondents to

participate in the study will be obtained using the purposive sampling which rests on the theory

that sometimes researchers must pre-select subgroups from an entire population to create a case

study or shape a grounded theory.

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Refugees both male and female between the age of 18-35 years residing in Kyaka ii

refugee settlement will be eligible. Participants not able to travel to and from the place of the

assessment will be excluded.

Instruments and measures

Structured interviews will be used with section A will include Biodata (Background

information), section B will measure Traumatic exposure using the Trauma history screen,

section C will measure PTSD using Post traumatic diagnostic scale, section D using measure

xv
xvi

PTG/ Resilience using Post traumatic growth inventory and Connor Davidson resilience scale

respectively.

Trauma history screen (THS)

Carlson et al. (2011) created the THS in California. The Trauma History Screen (THS) is an

easy-to-use, 14-item self-report questionnaire that asks about 13 different event categories as

well as "other" occurrences. Respondents are questioned about whether each event happened for

each occurrence ("yes" or "no"). The number of times the endorsed occurrences occurred is then

asked for by the respondents to mark. The next question asks respondents to provide specifics

regarding incidents "that really hurt you emotionally." Age at the time of the occurrence, actual

or imminent danger of death or harm, helplessness, dissociation, a four-point scale for distress

length ("not at all" to "a month or more"), and a five-point scale for distress intensity are all

evaluated ("not at all" to "very much") (Carlson et al., 2011). The THS has shown excellent

temporal stability with test–retest correlations of 0.93 for High Magnitude Stressors (HMS) and

0.73 for Post traumatic distress (PPD) events in a subset of this sample of homeless veterans, and

construct validity was supported by strong convergent validity with a longer measure of trauma

exposure (0.77) and correlations between PTSD symptoms and HMS (0.41) and PPD scores

(0.25) (Carlson et al., 2013).

Post traumatic diagnostic scale (PDS – 5)

PDS – 5 was developed by Enda B. Foa 1995. The PDS-5 is a 24-item self-report

measure that assesses PTSD symptom severity in the last month according to DSM-5 criteria.

Symptom items are rated on a 5-point scale of frequency and severity ranging from 0 (Not at all)

to 4 (6 or more times a week / severe. Because the items on the Post-Traumatic Stress Diagnostic

Scale (PDS) accurately capture a person's experience with PTSD and have good internal

xvi
xvii

consistency, the PDS has a high face validity (alpha coefficient of 0.92). Ages 18 to 65 people

were used to validate this scale (Foa et al., 2016) The PDS's alpha coefficients indicate that the

scale's overall score (.89) and its subscale scores (.80 for the Re-experiencing subscale,.71 for the

Avoidance subscale,.78 for the Hyper-arousal subscale, and.86 for the items evaluating

functional impairment) have extremely strong internal consistency.

Post-Traumatic Growth Inventory (PTGI)/ Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale -10 (CD-

RISC - 10)

The Post-Traumatic Growth Inventory (PTGI), created by Tedeschi and Calhoun in 1996

at the University of Carolina, measures a person's post-trauma growth and self-improvement.

This inventory, a 21-item scale based on the five-factor (Relating to Others, New Possibilities,

Personal Strength, Spiritual Enhancement, Appreciation). model of Tedeschi, is one of the most

valid and dependable tools for assessing human development following a stressful experience.

The PTGI measure factors' psychometric qualities have been reported: Internal consistency

(α=0.90) was determined to be strong, and test-retest reliability (r=0.71) was good. Scores on the

measure were found to be relatively regularly distributed across people reporting a variety of life

difficulties (Keidar, 2013). Davidson, created the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-

RISC). CD-RISC-10. The 10-item scale is made up of ten of the original 25 CD-RISC-10 scale

items. Drs. Campbell-Sills and Stein of the University of California, San Diego created this 10-

item scale, based on factor analysis. The CD-RISC-10 items version's (Spanish version)

Cronbach's alpha was .88 (Broche-Pérez et al., 2022).

Ethical considerations and procedures

The researcher will obtain an ethical clearance from the Institutional Review Board

(IRB). Furthermore, the researcher will obtain a letter of introduction from the Department of

xvii
xviii

Mental health, School of Psychology Makerere University which will be delivered to the Office

of the Prime minister (OPM) requesting authorization to collect data from the specified refugee

settlement. Simple language, clear and understandable questions will be used to enable easy data

collection. Consent will be obtained from the respondents to participate in the study and ensure

that they participate voluntarily. The respondents will sign the Consent forms. They will be

assured of confidentiality and the researcher will ensure no leakage of personal data through

coding the data collected.

Data management

Trauma history screen (THS)

13 event categories as well as "other" events Respondents are questioned about whether each

event happened for each occurrence ("yes" or "no"). four-point scale for distress length ("not at

all" to "a month or more"), and a five-point scale for distress intensity are all evaluated ("not at

all" to "very much"). THS is meant as a preliminary assessment of HMS and PPD exposure, as

well as people' subjective experiences. As a result, THS lacks a specific cut-off scoring

procedure (admin, 2018).

Post traumatic diagnostic scale (PDS – 5)

PTSD symptoms on a 5-point scale in accordance with DSM-5 criteria. 0 = Not at all, 1 =

Once per week or less / a little, 2 = 2 to 3 times per week / somewhat, 3 = 4 to 5 times per week /

a lot, 4 = 6 or more times a week / severe. PTSD severity is determined by totaling the 20 PDS-5

symptom ratings (items 1-20). Scores range from 0-80. With 0-10 minimal symptoms, 11-23

mild symptoms, 24-42 moderate symptoms, 43-59 severe symptoms, 60-80 very severe

symptoms.

xviii
xix

Post Traumatic Growth Inventory (PTGI)/ Connor Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC-

10)

On a 6-point scale, participants indicate their scores as follows: 0 - implies that I did not

have this experience as a result of my crisis, 1 - implies that I experienced this change to a very

minor degree as a result of my crisis, 2 - implies that I experienced this change to a minor degree

as a result of my crisis,. 3 - denotes that I experienced this change to a moderate degree as a

result of my crisis, 4 - denotes that I experienced this change to a great extent as a result of my

crisis, and 5 - denotes that I experienced this change to a very great extent as a result of my

crisis. The 21-item scale yields a total score with a potential range of 0-105 with a higher score

indicating stronger posttraumatic growth. For the CD-RISC, the total score of a respondent can

range from a minimum 0 to 40 maximum with the highest scores indicating higher levels of

resilience and lower levels the vice versa. The possible responses range from 0 – Not true at all,

1 - Rarely true, 2 - Occasionally true, 3 - Frequently true, 4 - Almost always true.

Data analysis

IBM Statistical package for social sciences (SPSS) version 22 is the software program

that will be used to analyze and test the relationship between the variables mentioned in this

research study. The statistical analysis that will be used after collecting the data will be a

Correlation analysis. Pearson’s correlation co efficient will be used to assess the significance of

the relationship between the hypothesis 1,2, 3 and 4 and the descriptive statistics tabulated into

frequencies and percentages.

xix
xx

References

Abraham, R., Lien, L., & Hanssen, I. (2018). Coping, resilience and posttraumatic growth among

Eritrean female refugees living in Norwegian asylum reception centres: A qualitative

study. International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 64(4), 359–366.

https://doi.org/10.1177/0020764018765237

admin, A. (2018, March 9). Trauma History Screen (THS). PsychTools.

https://www.psychtools.info/ths/

Ainamani, H. E., Elbert, T., Olema, D. K., & Hecker, T. (2016). Prevalence Of Violence-Related

Traumatic Events And Symptoms Of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Among The

Congolese Refugees In Uganda. https://ir.bsu.ac.ug//handle/20.500.12284/242

Bapolisi, A. M., Song, S. J., Kesande, C., Rukundo, G. Z., & Ashaba, S. (2020). Post-traumatic

stress disorder, psychiatric comorbidities and associated factors among refugees in

Nakivale camp in southwestern Uganda. BMC Psychiatry, 20(1).

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-020-2480-1

Benjet, C., Bromet, E., Karam, E. G., Kessler, R. C., McLaughlin, K. A., Ruscio, A. M., Shahly,

V., Stein, D. J., Petukhova, M., Hill, E., Alonso, J., Atwoli, L., Bunting, B., Bruffaerts,

R., Caldas-de-Almeida, J. M., de Girolamo, G., Florescu, S., Gureje, O., Huang, Y., …

Koenen, K. C. (2016). The epidemiology of traumatic event exposure worldwide: Results

from the World Mental Health Survey Consortium. Psychological Medicine, 46(2), 327–

343. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291715001981

xx
xxi

Bisson, J., Cosgrove, S., Lewis, C., & Roberts, N. (2015). Post-traumatic stress disorder. BMJ,

351, h6161. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h6161

Bohnet, H. ;, & Schmitz-Pranghe, C. (2019). www.ssoar.info Uganda: A role model for refugee

integration? https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-

Broche-Pérez, Y., Jiménez-Morales, R. M., Monasterio-Ramos, L. O., & Bauer, J. (2022).

Validity and reliability of the 10-item Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC-10)

in a sample of Spanish-speaking patients with Multiple Sclerosis. Multiple Sclerosis and

Related Disorders, 63, 103914. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msard.2022.103914

Carlson, E. B., Garvert, D. W., Macia, K. S., Ruzek, J. I., & Burling, T. A. (2013). Traumatic

Stressor Exposure and Post-Traumatic Symptoms in Homeless Veterans. Military

Medicine, 178(9), 970–973. https://doi.org/10.7205/MILMED-D-13-00080

Carlson, E. B., Smith, S. R., Palmieri, P. A., Dalenberg, C., Ruzek, J. I., Kimerling, R., Burling,

T. A., & Spain, D. A. (2011). Development and validation of a brief self-report measure

of trauma exposure: The Trauma History Screen. Psychological Assessment, 23(2), 463–

477. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022294

Cengiz, İ., Ergun, D., & Çakıcı, E. (2018). Posttraumatic stress disorder, posttraumatic growth

and psychological resilience in Syrian refugees: Hatay, Turkey. Anatolian Journal of

Psychiatry, 0, 1. https://doi.org/10.5455/apd.4862

Chan, K. J., Young, M. Y., & Sharif, N. (2016). Well-being after trauma: A review of

posttraumatic growth among refugees. Canadian Psychology, 57(4), 291–299.

https://doi.org/10.1037/CAP0000065

Czajkowska, Z. (2017). Theory of Cognitive Adaptation. In V. Zeigler-Hill & T. K. Shackelford

(Eds.), Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences (pp. 1–3). Springer

xxi
xxii

International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8_1019-1

Foa, E. B., McLean, C. P., Zang, Y., Zhong, J., Powers, M. B., Kauffman, B. Y., Rauch, S.,

Porter, K., & Knowles, K. (2016). Psychometric properties of the Posttraumatic

Diagnostic Scale for DSM–5 (PDS–5). Psychological Assessment, 28(10), 1166–1171.

https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000258

Hussain, D., & Bhushan, B. (2013). Posttraumatic Growth Experiences among Tibetan

Refugees: A Qualitative Investigation. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 10(2), 204–

216. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2011.616623

Keidar, M. (2013). CONCEPTUALIZATION OF POST TRAUMATIC GROWTH IN THE WORK

OF EXPERT TRAUMA THERAPISTS.

Kılıç, C., Magruder, K. M., & Koryürek, M. M. (2016). Does trauma type relate to posttraumatic

growth after war? A pilot study of young Iraqi war survivors living in Turkey.

Transcultural Psychiatry, 53(1), 110–123. https://doi.org/10.1177/1363461515612963

Lee, D., Yu, E. S., & Kim, N. H. (2020). Resilience as a mediator in the relationship between

posttraumatic stress and posttraumatic growth among adult accident or crime victims:

The moderated mediating effect of childhood trauma. European Journal of

Psychotraumatology, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/20008198.2019.1704563

Levin, K. (2006). Study Design III: Cross-sectional studies. Evidence-Based Dentistry, 7, 24–25.

https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ebd.6400375

Li, S. S. Y., Liddell, B. J., & Nickerson, A. (2016). The Relationship Between Post-Migration

Stress and Psychological Disorders in Refugees and Asylum Seekers. Current Psychiatry

Reports, 18(9), 82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-016-0723-0

xxii
xxiii

Mesa-Vieira, C., Haas, A. D., Buitrago-Garcia, D., Roa-Diaz, Z. M., Minder, B., Gamba, M.,

Salvador, D., Gomez, D., Lewis, M., Gonzalez-Jaramillo, W. C., Pahud de Mortanges,

A., Buttia, C., Muka, T., Trujillo, N., & Franco, O. H. (2022). Mental health of migrants

with pre-migration exposure to armed conflict: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

The Lancet Public Health, 7(5), e469–e481. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-

2667(22)00061-5

Naik, A., & Khan, S. (2019). POST TRAUMATIC GROWTH: AN OVERVIEW. 6, 1–4.

Schwabish, S. D. (2011). Cognitive Adaptation Theory as a Means to PTSD Reduction Among

Cancer Pain Patients. Journal of Psychosocial Oncology, 29(2), 141–156.

https://doi.org/10.1080/07347332.2010.548440

Shamia, N. A., Thabet, A. A. M., & Vostanis, P. (2015). Exposure to war traumatic experiences,

post-traumatic stress disorder and post-traumatic growth among nurses in Gaza. Journal

of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 22(10), 749–755.

https://doi.org/10.1111/jpm.12264

Ssenyonga, J., Owens, V., & Olema, D. K. (2013). Posttraumatic Growth, Resilience, and

Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) among Refugees. Procedia - Social and

Behavioral Sciences, 82, 144–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.06.238

Taylor, S. E. (1983). Adjustment to threatening events: A theory of cognitive adaptation.

American Psychologist, 38(11), 1161–1173. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-

066X.38.11.1161

Tedeschi, R. G., Shakespeare-Finch, J., Taku, K., & Calhoun, L. G. (2018). Posttraumatic

Growth: Theory, Research, and Applications. Posttraumatic Growth.

https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315527451

xxiii
xxiv

Tekie, Y. (2018). The Role of Meaning-Making in Posttraumatic Growth among Eritrean

Refugees with Posttraumatic Stress Disorder. Doctoral Dissertations.

https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss/4802

Yuan, G., Xu, W., Liu, Z., & An, Y. (2018). Resilience, Posttraumatic Stress Symptoms, and

Posttraumatic Growth in Chinese Adolescents after a Tornado: The Role of Mediation

Through Perceived Social Support. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 206(2), 130–

135. https://doi.org/10.1097/NMD.0000000000000778

Appendix

Work plan/time schedule

Year 2023

Month

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

No Activity Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

xxiv
xxv

1 Proposal writing

2 Departmental and

school clearance

3 Ethical clearance :

IRB

4 Data collection

5 Data cleaning and

entry

6 Data analysis

7 Thesis writing

8 Handing in thesis

for marking

Budget

Activity Amount

IRB 150,000shs

Printing out proposal 100,000shs

Compensation for participants 700,000shs

Transport for every activity 250,000shs

xxv
xxvi

Printing out of questionnaires 150,000shs

Total 1,350,000shs

Instruments

Section A: Demographic information/Bio data

1. How old are you? _______________

2. What is your nationality? ___________________________

3. What is your marital status (tick one)

Married Single Divorced/Separated

4. Do you stay with your spouse? __________

5. What is your education level?

Did not go to School Primary Secondary

Tertiary/University

6. What is your occupation? ______________________

7. How many children do you have? ______________________

Section B: Trauma History Screen

The events below may or may not have happened to you. Circle “YES” if that kind of thing has
happened to you or circle “NO” if that kind of thing has not happened to you. If you circle
“YES” for any events: put a number in the blank next to it to show how many times something
like that happened.
Circle Circle “NO” Number
“YES” if if that kind of times
that kind of something
Event of thing has thing has not like this has
happened to happened to happened
you you

xxvi
xxvii

A.A really bad car, boat, train, or airplane accident YES NO _____ times

B.A really bad accident at work or home YES NO _____ times

C.A hurricane, flood, earthquake, tornado, or fire YES NO _____ times

D. Hit or kicked hard enough to injure - as a child YES NO _____ times

E.Hit or kicked hard enough to injure - as an adult YES NO _____ times

F.Forced or made to have sexual contact - as a child YES NO _____ times

G. Forced or made to have sexual contact - as an adult YES NO _____ times

H. Attack with a gun, knife, or weapon YES NO _____ times


I. During military service - seeing something horrible or
YES NO _____ times
being badly scared
J. Sudden death of close family or friend YES NO _____ times
K. Seeing someone die suddenly or get badly hurt or
YES NO _____ times
killed
L. Some other sudden event that made you feel very
YES NO _____ times
scared, helpless, or horrified
M. Sudden move or loss of home and possessions YES NO _____ times
N. Suddenly abandoned by spouse, partner, parent, or
YES NO _____ times
family
Did any of these things really bother you emotionally? NO YES

If you answered “YES”, fill out one or more of the boxes on the next pages to tell about
EVERY event that really bothered you.

Letter from above for the type of event: ______ Your age when this happened: ______
Describe what happened:

xxvii
xxviii

When this happened, did anyone get hurt or killed? NO YES


When this happened, were you afraid that you or someone else might get hurt or killed? NO
YES
When this happened, did you feel very afraid, helpless, or horrified? NO YES
When this happened, did you feel unreal, spaced out, disoriented, or strange? NO
YES
After this happened, how long were you bothered by it? not at all / 1 week / 2-3 weeks / a
month or more
How much did it bother you emotionally? not at all / a little / somewhat / much / very
much

Letter from above for the type of event: ______ Your age when this happened: ______
Describe what happened:

When this happened, did anyone get hurt or killed? NO YES


When this happened, were you afraid that you or someone else might get hurt or killed? NO
YES
When this happened, did you feel very afraid, helpless, or horrified? NO YES
When this happened, did you feel unreal, spaced out, disoriented, or strange? NO
YES
After this happened, how long were you bothered by it? not at all / 1 week / 2-3 weeks / a
month or more
How much did it bother you emotionally? not at all / a little / somewhat / much / very
much

xxviii
xxix

Letter from above for the type of event: ______ Your age when this happened: ______
Describe what happened:

When this happened, did anyone get hurt or killed? NO YES


When this happened, were you afraid that you or someone else might get hurt or killed? NO
YES
When this happened, did you feel very afraid, helpless, or horrified? NO YES
When this happened, did you feel unreal, spaced out, disoriented, or strange? NO
YES
After this happened, how long were you bothered by it? not at all / 1 week / 2-3 weeks / a
month or more
How much did it bother you emotionally? not at all / a little / somewhat / much / very
much

Letter from above for the type of event: ______ Your age when this happened: ______
Describe what happened:

When this happened, did anyone get hurt or killed? NO YES

xxix
xxx

When this happened, were you afraid that you or someone else might get hurt or killed? NO
YES
When this happened, did you feel very afraid, helpless, or horrified? NO YES
When this happened, did you feel unreal, spaced out, disoriented, or strange? NO
YES
After this happened, how long were you bothered by it? not at all / 1 week / 2-3 weeks / a
month or more
How much did it bother you emotionally? not at all / a little / somewhat / much / very
much
Letter from above for the type of event: ______ Your age when this
happened: ______ Describe what happened:

When this happened, did anyone get hurt or killed? NO YES


When this happened, were you afraid that you or someone else might get hurt or killed? NO
YES
When this happened, did you feel very afraid, helpless, or horrified? NO YES
When this happened, did you feel unreal, spaced out, disoriented, or strange? NO
YES
After this happened, how long were you bothered by it? not at all / 1 week / 2-3 weeks / a
month or more
How much did it bother you emotionally? not at all / a little / somewhat / much / very
much

Letter from above for the type of event: ______ Your age when this
happened: ______ Describe what happened:

xxx
xxxi

When this happened, did anyone get hurt or killed? NO YES


When this happened, were you afraid that you or someone else might get hurt or killed? NO
YES
When this happened, did you feel very afraid, helpless, or horrified? NO YES
When this happened, did you feel unreal, spaced out, disoriented, or strange? NO
YES
After this happened, how long were you bothered by it? not at all / 1 week / 2-3 weeks / a
month or more How much did it bother you emotionally? not at all / a little /
somewhat / much / very much

Section C: Post trauma diagnostic scale (PDS)

Subject ID________
Date__________

TRAUMA SCREEN

Have you ever experienced, witnessed, or been repeatedly confronted with any of the following:
(Check all that apply)?

attacked with a weapon, severe injuries from a fight, held at gunpoint, etc.)

years
older than you, etc.)

xxxi
xxxii

):

_____________________________________________________________________________
_____________
_____________________________________________________________________________
_____________
_____________________________________________________________________________
_____________

*** If NONE, please STOP and return this questionnaire ***

If you marked any of the above items, which single traumatic experience is on your mind and
currently bothers you the most:
(Check only one)

lt (attacked with a weapon, severe injuries from a fight, held at gunpoint, etc.)

ne 5 years
older than you, etc.)

):
_____________________________________________________________________________
_____________
_____________________________________________________________________________
_____________
_____________________________________________________________________________
_____________

xxxii
xxxiii

Page 1
©2013 Edna B. Foa
All rights reserved. Reproduction or redistribution, in whole or in part, in any manner, without
the prior written consent of the copyright holder, is a violation of copyright law.

Mental health researchers and clinicians may make copies of the measure for their own clinical
and research use. Any other use is prohibited.
Instructions: Below is a list of problems that people sometimes have after experiencing a
traumatic event. Write down the most distressing traumatic event that you checked on the last
page:

Please read each statement carefully and circle the number that best describes how often that
problem has been happening and how much it upset you over THE LAST MONTH. Rate each
problem with respect to the traumatic event that you wrote above.

For example, if you’ve talked to a friend about the trauma one time in the past month, you
would respond like this: (because one time in the past month is less than once a week)

Talking to other people about the trauma

0 1 2 3 4
Not at all Once a week or 2 to 3 times a 4 to 5 times a 6 or more
times a less/a little week/somewhat week/very
much week/severe

1. Unwanted upsetting memories about the trauma

0 1 2 3 4
Not at all Once a week or 2 to 3 times a 4 to 5 times a 6 or more
times a less/a little week/somewhat week/very
much week/severe

2. Bad dreams or nightmares related to the trauma

xxxiii
xxxiv

0 1 2 3 4
Not at all Once a week or 2 to 3 times a 4 to 5 times a 6 or more
times a less/a little week/somewhat week/very
much week/severe

3. Reliving the traumatic event or feeling as if it were actually happening again

0 1 2 3 4
Not at all Once a week or 2 to 3 times a 4 to 5 times a 6 or more
times a less/a little week/somewhat week/very
much week/severe

4. Feeling very EMOTIONALLY upset when reminded of the trauma

0 1 2 3 4
Not at all Once a week or 2 to 3 times a 4 to 5 times a 6 or more
times a less/a little week/somewhat week/very
much week/severe

5. Having PHYSICAL reactions when reminded of the trauma (for example, sweating,

heart racing)

0 1 2 3 4
Not at all Once a week or 2 to 3 times a 4 to 5 times a 6 or more
times a less/a little week/somewhat week/very
much week/severe

6. Trying to avoid thoughts or feelings related to the trauma

0 1 2 3 4
Not at all Once a week or 2 to 3 times a 4 to 5 times a 6 or more
times a less/a little week/somewhat week/very
much week/severe

7. Trying to avoid activities, situations, or places that remind you of the trauma or that

feel more dangerous since the trauma

xxxiv
xxxv

0 1 2 3 4
Not at all Once a week or 2 to 3 times a 4 to 5 times a 6 or more
times a less/a little week/somewhat week/very
much week/severe

8. Not being able to remember important parts of the trauma

0 1 2 3 4
Not at all Once a week or 2 to 3 times a 4 to 5 times a 6 or more
times a less/a little week/somewhat week/very
much week/severe

9. Seeing yourself, others, or the world in a more negative way (for example ”I can’t trust

people,” “I’m a weak person”)

0 1 2 3 4
Not at all Once a week or 2 to 3 times a 4 to 5 times a 6 or more
times a less/a little week/somewhat week/very
much week/severe

10. Blaming yourself or others (besides the person who hurt you) for what happened

0 1 2 3 4
Not at all Once a week or 2 to 3 times a 4 to 5 times a 6 or more
times a less/a little week/somewhat week/very
much week/severe

11. Having intense negative feelings like fear, horror, anger, guilt or shame

0 1 2 3 4
Not at all Once a week or 2 to 3 times a 4 to 5 times a6 or more times
less/a little week/somewhat week/very much a week/severe

12. Losing interest or not participating in activities you used to


do

xxxv
xxxvi

0 1 2 3 4
Not at all Once a week or 2 to 3 times a 4 to 5 times a6 or more times
less/a little week/somewhat week/very much a week/severe

13. Feeling distant or cut off from others


0 1 2 3 4
Not at all Once a week or 2 to 3 times a 4 to 5 times a6 or more times
less/a little week/somewhat week/very much a week/severe

14. Having difficulty experiencing positive feelings


0 1 2 3 4
Not at all Once a week or 2 to 3 times a 4 to 5 times a6 or more times
less/a little week/somewhat week/very much a week/severe

15. Acting more irritable or aggressive with others


0 1 2 3 4
Not at all Once a week or 2 to 3 times a 4 to 5 times a6 or more times
less/a little week/somewhat week/very much a week/severe

16. Taking more risks or doing things that might cause you or others harm (for example,

driving recklessly, taking drugs, having unprotected sex)

0 1 2 3 4
Not at all Once a week or 2 to 3 times a 4 to 5 times a 6 or more
times a less/a little week/somewhat week/very
much week/severe

17. Being overly alert or on-guard (for example, checking to see who is around you, being

uncomfortable with your back to a door)

0 1 2 3 4
Not at all Once a week or 2 to 3 times a 4 to 5 times a 6 or more
times a less/a little week/somewhat week/very
much week/severe

18. Being jumpy or more easily startled (for example when someone walks up behind you)

0 1 2 3 4

xxxvi
xxxvii

Not at all Once a week or 2 to 3 times a 4 to 5 times a 6 or more


times a less/a little week/somewhat week/very
much week/severe

19. Having trouble concentrating

0 1 2 3 4
Not at all Once a week or 2 to 3 times a 4 to 5 times a 6 or more
times a less/a little week/somewhat week/very
much week/severe

20. Having trouble falling or staying asleep

0 1 2 3 4
Not at all Once a week or 2 to 3 times a 4 to 5 times a 6 or more
times a less/a little week/somewhat week/very
much week/severe

DISTRESS AND INTERFERENCE

21. How much have these difficulties been bothering you?


0 1 2 3 4
Not at all Once a week or 2 to 3 times a 4 to 5 times a 6 or more
times a less/a little week/somewhat week/very
much week/severe

22. How much have these difficulties been interfering with your everyday life (for example
relationships, work, or other important activities)?
0 1 2 3 4
Not at all Once a week or 2 to 3 times a 4 to 5 times a 6 or more
times a less/a little week/somewhat week/very
much week/severe

SYMPTOM ONSET AND DURATION

23. How long after the trauma did these difficulties begin? [circle one]
a. Less than 6 months
b. More than 6 months

xxxvii
xxxviii

24. How long have you had these trauma-related difficulties? [circle one]
a. Less than 1 month
b. More than 1 month

Section C: PTGI/CD RISC – 10

Client Name: Today’s Date:

Indicate for each of the statements below the degree to which this change occurred in your life as
a result of the crisis/disaster, using the following scale.

0 = I did not experience this change as a result of my crisis.


1 = I experienced this change to a very small degree as a result of my crisis.
2 = I experienced this change to a small degree as a result of my crisis.
3 = I experienced this change to a moderate degree as a result of my crisis.
4 = I experienced this change to a great degree as a result of my crisis.
5 = I experienced this change to a very great degree as a result of my crisis.

Possible Areas of Growth and Change 0 1 2 3 4 5


1. I changed my priorities about what is important in life.
2. I have a greater appreciation for the value of my own life.
3. I developed new interests.
4. I have a greater feeling of self-reliance.
5. I have a better understanding of spiritual matters.

xxxviii
xxxix

6. I more clearly see that I can count on people in times of trouble.

7. I established a new path for my life.


8. I have a greater sense of closeness with others.
9. I am more willing to express my emotions.
10. I know better that I can handle difficulties.
11. I am able to do better things with my life.
12. I am better able to accept the way things work out.
13. I can better appreciate each day.
14. New opportunities are available which wouldn't have been
otherwise.
15. I have more compassion for others.
16. I put more effort into my relationships.
17. I am more likely to try to change things which need changing.

18. I have a stronger religious faith.


19. I discovered that I'm stronger than I thought I was.
20. I learned a great deal about how wonderful people are.
21. I better accept needing others.

xxxix
xl

xl

You might also like