This document discusses strategic performance management and measurement. It defines performance management as focusing on individual performance to enhance organizational strategic objectives. Performance is typically measured annually by HR and line managers to evaluate if strategic objectives are being successfully implemented and achieved. Measuring performance helps ensure jobs are designed correctly, the right people are hired and trained, and people are rewarded and motivated to achieve business goals, improving organizational performance. Raters of employee performance are usually immediate supervisors, but can be anyone familiar with the job responsibilities and performance objectives who can distinguish effective from ineffective behaviors.
This document discusses strategic performance management and measurement. It defines performance management as focusing on individual performance to enhance organizational strategic objectives. Performance is typically measured annually by HR and line managers to evaluate if strategic objectives are being successfully implemented and achieved. Measuring performance helps ensure jobs are designed correctly, the right people are hired and trained, and people are rewarded and motivated to achieve business goals, improving organizational performance. Raters of employee performance are usually immediate supervisors, but can be anyone familiar with the job responsibilities and performance objectives who can distinguish effective from ineffective behaviors.
This document discusses strategic performance management and measurement. It defines performance management as focusing on individual performance to enhance organizational strategic objectives. Performance is typically measured annually by HR and line managers to evaluate if strategic objectives are being successfully implemented and achieved. Measuring performance helps ensure jobs are designed correctly, the right people are hired and trained, and people are rewarded and motivated to achieve business goals, improving organizational performance. Raters of employee performance are usually immediate supervisors, but can be anyone familiar with the job responsibilities and performance objectives who can distinguish effective from ineffective behaviors.
This document discusses strategic performance management and measurement. It defines performance management as focusing on individual performance to enhance organizational strategic objectives. Performance is typically measured annually by HR and line managers to evaluate if strategic objectives are being successfully implemented and achieved. Measuring performance helps ensure jobs are designed correctly, the right people are hired and trained, and people are rewarded and motivated to achieve business goals, improving organizational performance. Raters of employee performance are usually immediate supervisors, but can be anyone familiar with the job responsibilities and performance objectives who can distinguish effective from ineffective behaviors.
Storey and Sisson define performance management as “an interlocking set of policies and practices which have as their focus the enhanced achievement of organizational strategic objectives through a concentration on individual performance” (Storey & Sisson, 1993). Performance management and performance appraisal are typically designed on a central basis by HR function and require each line manager to appraise performance of their staff. These measurements are done in annual basis (Torrington et al., 2005, p. 259).The evaluation of organizational and employee performance permits the manager to check that the strategic objectives are valid, are being successfully communicated throughout the organisation and are being achieved. In short, performance management ensures that the jobs are designed accurately and that eligible persons are hired, trained, rewarded and motivated to achieve the organizations business objectives. By managing the better employee performance, the organization gains better cash flow, productivity increases and overall better financial performance (Mcdonald & Smith, 1995). Baron & Armstrong state that the nature of measuring employee performance in organization will increase the effectiveness of the organization, by improving the people performance who work in them and by developing the capabilities of teams and individual contributors(Baron & Armstrong, 1998, pp. 38-39). Lebas (1995) writes that the difference between performance measurement and performance
Strategic human resource management
P a g e | 15
management, performance measurement includes measures based on the key performance
indicator (KPI) set and key success factors which includes: measures to track the past achievements; measures of output and input, Whereas performance management involves in issues as training, teamwork, management method, employee involvement and rewards (Lebas, 1995, pp. 23-35). Appraising and managing performance are the critical management responsibilities and it’s a vital part of the organizations strategic management process. Performance appraisal system are impermanent and divorced from organisations business strategy when comes to practices. Many companies do not link their strategic objectives with individual employee performance criteria (haygroup, 2001; Nankervis & Leece, 1998).
Figure 5: model of Strategic performance management & measurement (Stone, 2005, p. 295)
4.4.1 Rater of Employee Performance
In most of the organizations, evaluation of employee performance is done by immediate supervisor. In fact, performance appraisal can be done by anyone who is familiar with the job responsibilities and performance objectives and he has to know –how to distinguish behaviours that produce effective or ineffective performance. Consequently, immediate