Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 18 views

    Output SPS2

    Uploaded by

    utin puti
    - The document contains output from SPSS analyzing data on paritas (risk level), compliance, and anemia levels in 36 patients. - It finds a significant association between paritas level and anemia severity, with those at higher risk more likely to have severe anemia. - Compliance is also significantly associated with anemia, as non-compliant patients are more likely to have severe anemia. - Odds ratio calculations quantify the increased odds of severe anemia for higher risk and non-compliant groups compared to lower risk and compliant groups.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Output SPS2

    Uploaded by

    utin puti
    18 views7 pages
    - The document contains output from SPSS analyzing data on paritas (risk level), compliance, and anemia levels in 36 patients. - It finds a significant association between paritas level and anemia severity, with those at higher risk more likely to have severe anemia. - Compliance is also significantly associated with anemia, as non-compliant patients are more likely to have severe anemia. - Odds ratio calculations quantify the increased odds of severe anemia for higher risk and non-compliant groups compared to lower risk and compliant groups.

    Original Description:

    Original Title

    OUTPUT SPS2

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    - The document contains output from SPSS analyzing data on paritas (risk level), compliance, and anemia levels in 36 patients. - It finds a significant association between paritas level and anemia severity, with those at higher risk more likely to have severe anemia. - Compliance is also significantly associated with anemia, as non-compliant patients are more likely to have severe anemia. - Odds ratio calculations quantify the increased odds of severe anemia for higher risk and non-compliant groups compared to lower risk and compliant groups.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    18 views7 pages

    Output SPS2

    Uploaded by

    utin puti
    - The document contains output from SPSS analyzing data on paritas (risk level), compliance, and anemia levels in 36 patients. - It finds a significant association between paritas level and anemia severity, with those at higher risk more likely to have severe anemia. - Compliance is also significantly associated with anemia, as non-compliant patients are more likely to have severe anemia. - Odds ratio calculations quantify the increased odds of severe anemia for higher risk and non-compliant groups compared to lower risk and compliant groups.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 7

    OUTPUT SPSS

    Paritas
    Cumulative
    Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
    Valid Tidak Beresiko 23 63.9 63.9 63.9
    Beresiko 13 36.1 36.1 100.0
    Total 36 100.0 100.0

    Kepatuhan
    Cumulative
    Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
    Valid Patuh 18 50.0 50.0 50.0
    Tidak Patuh 18 50.0 50.0 100.0
    Total 36 100.0 100.0

    Anemia
    Cumulative
    Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
    Valid Ringan 27 75.0 75.0 75.0
    Berat 9 25.0 25.0 100.0
    Total 36 100.0 100.0
    Crosstabs

    Case Processing Summary


    Cases
    Valid Missing Total
    N Percent N Percent N Percent
    Paritas * Anemia 36 100.0% 0 0.0% 36 100.0%
    Kepatuhan * Anemia 36 100.0% 0 0.0% 36 100.0%

    Paritas * Anemia

    Crosstab
    Anemia
    Ringan Berat Total
    Paritas Tidak Beresiko Count 20 3 23
    % within Paritas 87.0% 13.0% 100.0%
    Beresiko Count 7 6 13
    % within Paritas 53.8% 46.2% 100.0%
    Total Count 27 9 36
    % within Paritas 75.0% 25.0% 100.0%

    Chi-Square Tests
    Asymptotic
    Significance (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-
    Value df sided) sided) sided)
    Pearson Chi-Square 4.856a 1 .028
    Continuity Correction b
    3.251 1 .071
    Likelihood Ratio 4.732 1 .030
    Fisher's Exact Test .046 .037
    Linear-by-Linear Association 4.721 1 .030
    N of Valid Cases 36
    a. 1 cells (25.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 3.25.
    b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

    Symmetric Measures
    Asymptotic Approximate
    Value Standard Error a
    Approximate T b
    Significance
    Interval by Interval Pearson's R .367 .163 2.303 .028c
    Ordinal by Ordinal Spearman Correlation .367 .163 2.303 .028c
    N of Valid Cases 36
    a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.
    b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
    c. Based on normal approximation.

    Risk Estimate
    95% Confidence Interval
    Value Lower Upper
    Odds Ratio for Paritas (Tidak 5.714 1.118 29.207
    Beresiko / Beresiko)
    For cohort Anemia = Ringan 1.615 .953 2.737
    For cohort Anemia = Berat .283 .084 .945
    N of Valid Cases 36

    Kepatuhan * Anemia

    Crosstab
    Anemia
    Ringan Berat Total
    Kepatuhan Patuh Count 17 1 18
    % within Kepatuhan 94.4% 5.6% 100.0%
    Tidak Patuh Count 10 8 18
    % within Kepatuhan 55.6% 44.4% 100.0%
    Total Count 27 9 36
    % within Kepatuhan 75.0% 25.0% 100.0%

    Chi-Square Tests
    Asymptotic
    Significance (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-
    Value df sided) sided) sided)
    Pearson Chi-Square 7.259 a
    1 .007
    Continuity Correction b
    5.333 1 .021
    Likelihood Ratio 8.033 1 .005
    Fisher's Exact Test .018 .009
    Linear-by-Linear Association 7.058 1 .008
    N of Valid Cases 36
    a. 2 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 4.50.
    b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

    Symmetric Measures
    Asymptotic Approximate
    Value Standard Error a
    Approximate T b
    Significance
    Interval by Interval Pearson's R .449 .129 2.930 .006c
    Ordinal by Ordinal Spearman Correlation .449 .129 2.930 .006c
    N of Valid Cases 36
    a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.
    b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
    c. Based on normal approximation.

    Risk Estimate
    95% Confidence Interval
    Value Lower Upper
    Odds Ratio for Kepatuhan 13.600 1.476 125.314
    (Patuh / Tidak Patuh)
    For cohort Anemia = Ringan 1.700 1.108 2.608
    For cohort Anemia = Berat .125 .017 .900
    N of Valid Cases 36
    Logistic Regression

    Case Processing Summary


    Unweighted Casesa N Percent
    Selected Cases Included in Analysis 36 100.0
    Missing Cases 0 .0
    Total 36 100.0
    Unselected Cases 0 .0
    Total 36 100.0
    a. If weight is in effect, see classification table for the total number of
    cases.

    Dependent Variable
    Encoding
    Original Value Internal Value
    Ringan 0
    Berat 1

    Block 0: Beginning Block

    Classification Tablea,b
    Predicted
    Anemia Percentage
    Observed Ringan Berat Correct
    Step 0 Anemia Ringan 27 0 100.0
    Berat 9 0 .0
    Overall Percentage 75.0
    a. Constant is included in the model.
    b. The cut value is .500

    Variables in the Equation


    B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B)
    Step 0 Constant -1.099 .385 8.147 1 .004 .333

    Variables not in the Equation


    Score df Sig.
    Step 0 Variables Paritas 4.856 1 .028
    Kepatuhan 7.259 1 .007
    Overall Statistics 10.367 2 .006

    Block 1: Method = Enter

    Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients


    Chi-square df Sig.
    Step 1 Step 11.678 2 .003
    Block 11.678 2 .003
    Model 11.678 2 .003

    Model Summary
    Cox & Snell R Nagelkerke R
    Step -2 Log likelihood Square Square
    1 28.810a .277 .410
    a. Estimation terminated at iteration number 6 because
    parameter estimates changed by less than .001.
    Classification Tablea
    Predicted
    Anemia Percentage
    Observed Ringan Berat Correct
    Step 1 Anemia Ringan 25 2 92.6
    Berat 3 6 66.7
    Overall Percentage 86.1
    a. The cut value is .500

    Variables in the Equation


    95% C.I.for EXP(B)
    B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B) Lower Upper
    Step 1 a
    Paritas 1.716 .937 3.357 1 .067 5.562 .887 34.869
    Kepatuhan 2.589 1.181 4.807 1 .028 13.316 1.316 134.754
    Constant -7.911 2.735 8.366 1 .004 .000
    a. Variable(s) entered on step 1: Paritas, Kepatuhan.

    You might also like