M Form 3B-1

TEACHER CLASSROOM OBSERVATION RATING CHECKLIST

TEACHER: SCHOOL: DISTRICT: VILLABA NORTH START:
GRADE/YEAR: SUBJECT: DATE: FINISH:
OBJECTIVE: _____________________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________.

CLASSROOM PREPARTION MANAGEMENT

P US S VS O
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS 2 4 6 8 10 REMARKS/AGREEMENTS
1. Classroom was structured to enhance
learning (display board, seating 2 4 6 8 10
arrangement, light, ventilation, etc.
2. All necessary visual aids/instructional
materials were prepared ahead f time. 2 4 6 8 10
3. Boardwork was prepared before classes
Started. 2 4 6 8 10
4. Teacher was flexible in his/her time
management. 2 4 6 8 10
5. Maintained order and discipline in
Classroom. 2 4 6 8 10
Sub-total of points ______+ _____+ _____+ ______+______ = ____/5= ______
(a) (b) (c) (d) (e)
TEACHING-LEARNING PROCESS
The Teacher
1. Clearly formulated the objective of the lesson. 2 4 6 8 10
2. Attained the objective of the lesson. 2 4 6 8 10
3. Showed proficiency in required language of
instruction. 2 4 6 8 10
4. Presented the lesson in a way which captured
The interest of the learners. 2 4 6 8 10
5. Used real life situations, concrete objects, print
and non-print materials in the 2 4 6 8 10
presentation/development of the lesson.
6. Considered interweaving of task/skill/process
And content. 2 4 6 8 10
7. Provided meaningful connections between and
among learning opportunities, prior knowledge,
relevant events and the learner’s lives and 2 4 6 8 10
experiences.
8. Employed/utilized integrative strategies
_______ Integration of values in the subject
taught.
_______ Integration of Science and Health
concepts in English as content. 2 4 6 8 10
_______ Integration of SK/HKS concepts in
Filipino as content.
_______ Integration of EPP,HKS and MSEP
integration across learning areas.
9. Provided varied activities to encourage
participation of everyone especially slow 2 6 8 10
learners. 4
10. Provided activities for interactive/group work/
cooperative learning. 2 4 6 8 10
11. Acted as facilitator during class discussion. 2 4 6 8 10
12. Provided varied learning activities congruent to
the objective of the lesson 2 4 6 8 10
13. Recognized pupil’s individual differences and
provided activities for
_____________remediation 2 4 6 8 10
_____________reinforcement
_____________enrichment
14. Asked questions that developed critical thinking
skills, e.g. open-ended questions. 2 4 6 8 10
 15. Gave homework as a follow-up of the lesson
 Used textbooks/materials 2 4 6 8 10
 Used textbooks/materials
Clearly/appropriately
 Used instructional materials creatively to
Get ideas across.
16. Showed over-all mastery of the subject matter
2 4 6 8 10
17. Were actively engaged throughout the lesson
2 4 6 8 10
18. Asked/answered questions reflecting Higher
Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) 2 4 6 8 10
19. Were generally happy in class.
2 4 6 8 10
20. Were generally motivated to learn more.
2 4 6 8 10
Sub-total of points ______+______+______+______+______= ______/20=______
(a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (Total Points)
III. ASSESSMENT OF PUPILS
1. Learning was evaluated through seatwork
exercises/paper and pencil test. 2 4 6 8 10
2. Learning was evaluated through portfolio
Assessment. 2 4 6 8 10
3. Learner’s other needs were diagnosed after the
Lesson. 2 4 6 8 10
4. The lesson was assessed to determine if the
objective was attained within the allotted time. 2 4 6 8 10
Sub-total of points ______+______+______+______+______= ______/4 =______
(a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (Total Points)
IV. CLASSROOM INTERACTION
RATE THE TEACHING-LEARNING PROCESS AS A WHOLE IN TERMS OF INTERACTION
1. Pupil –Teacher Interaction
2 4 6 8 10
2. Pupil-Pupil Interaction
2 4 6 8 10
3. Pupil-Materilas Interaction
2 4 6 8 10
Sub-total of points ______+______+______+______+______= ______/3 =______
(a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (Total Points)
(b)
V. OTHER COMMENTS ON THE CLASSROOM OBSERVATION
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Rating Scale: SUMMARY OF RATING Weight Rating Points

(a) (b) (axb)

10 – Outstanding I. Classroom Prep./Mgt. 20% ______ ______

8 – Very Satisfactory II. Teaching-Learning Process 50% ______ ______
6 – Satisfactory III. Pupil Assessment 20% ______ ______
4 – Unsatisfactory/Below Average IV. Classroom Interaction 10% ______ ______

Over all Rating _________________

Key to Descriptive Rating

8.60 - 10.00 = O Observed by: RHODORA V. TUMAMAK

6.60 - 8.59 = VS (Signature Over Printed Name)
4.60 - 6.59 = S
2.60 - 4.59 = US Position: Head Teacher -I
2.59 and below = P
Date: _________________________________

Conforme:

Teacher Observed / Rated: _____________ ____________

(Signature Over Printed Name)

Date: _______________________________________________