New Ideas On Super Gradient by Hyper K-Class of SuperHyperK-Number in Cancer's Recognition With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph

See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.
net/publication/368752952
New Ideas In Cancer's Recognition And Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph By

SuperHyperK-Number As Hyper k-Partition On Super Layers
Preprint · February 2023

DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.33103.76968
CITATIONS READ
0 1
1 author:
Henry Garrett
332 PUBLICATIONS 4,296 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
Neutrosophic Graphs View project
Featured Articles View project
All content following this page was uploaded by Henry Garrett on 24 February 2023.
The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 2
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperK-Number As Hyper 3
k-Partition On Super Layers 4
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · 6
DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA 7
1 ABSTRACT 8
In this scientific research, (Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic 9
SuperHyperK-Number). Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is an 10
K-Numbered pair S = (V, E). Consider a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet 11
V 0 = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vs } and E 0 = {E1 , E2 , . . . , Ez }. Then either V 0 or E 0 is called 12
Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperK-Number if 13
|E 0 | = k, ∀Ea ∈ EN SHG \ E 0 , ∃Eb ∈ E 0 , ∃Vc ∈ V, Vc ∈ Ea , Eb ; Neutrosophic 14
re-SuperHyperK-Number if 15
|E 0 | = k, ∀Ea ∈ EN SHG \ E 0 , ∃Eb ∈ E 0 , ∃Vc ∈ V, Vc ∈ Ea , Eb ; and 16
|Ei |NEUTROSOPIC CARDINALITY = |Ej |NEUTROSOPIC CARDINALITY ; Neutrosophic 17
v-SuperHyperK-Number if |V 0 | = k, ∀Va ∈ VN SHG \ V 0 , ∃Vb ∈ V 0 , ∃Ec ∈ E, Va , Vb ∈ Vc ; 18
Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperK-Number if 19
|V 0 | = k, ∀Va ∈ VN SHG \ V 0 , ∃Vb ∈ V 0 , ∃Ec ∈ E, Va , Vb ∈ Vc ; and 20
|Vi |NEUTROSOPIC CARDINALITY = |Vj |NEUTROSOPIC CARDINALITY ; Neutrosophic 21
SuperHyperK-Number if it’s either of Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperK-Number, 22
Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperK-Number, Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperK-Number, and 23
Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperK-Number. ((Neutrosophic) SuperHyperK-Number). 24
Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is an K-Numbered pair 25
S = (V, E). Consider a Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) E = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vs }. 26
Then E is called an Extreme SuperHyperK-Number if it’s either of Neutrosophic 27
e-SuperHyperK-Number, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperK-Number, Neutrosophic 28
v-SuperHyperK-Number, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperK-Number and C(N SHG) 29
for an Extreme SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the maximum Extreme cardinality 30
of an Extreme SuperHyperSet S of high Extreme cardinality of the Extreme 31
SuperHyperEdges in the consecutive Extreme sequence of Extreme SuperHyperEdges 32
and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form the Extreme 33
SuperHyperK-Number; a Neutrosophic SuperHyperK-Number if it’s either of 34
Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperK-Number, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperK-Number, 35
Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperK-Number, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperK-Number and 36
C(N SHG) for a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the maximum 37
Neutrosophic cardinality of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges of a Neutrosophic 38
SuperHyperSet S of high Neutrosophic cardinality consecutive Neutrosophic 39
SuperHyperEdges and Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that they form the 40
Neutrosophic SuperHyperK-Number; an Extreme SuperHyperK-Number 41
SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either of Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperK-Number, 42
Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperK-Number and C(N SHG) for an Extreme 44
SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the Extreme SuperHyperPolynomial contains the 45
Extreme coefficients defined as the Extreme number of the maximum Extreme 46
cardinality of the Extreme SuperHyperEdges of an Extreme SuperHyperSet S of high 47
Extreme cardinality consecutive Extreme SuperHyperEdges and Extreme 48
SuperHyperVertices such that they form the Extreme SuperHyperK-Number; and the 49
Extreme power is corresponded to its Extreme coefficient; a Neutrosophic 50
SuperHyperK-Number SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either of Neutrosophic 51
for a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the Neutrosophic 54
SuperHyperPolynomial contains the Neutrosophic coefficients defined as the 55
Neutrosophic number of the maximum Neutrosophic cardinality of the Neutrosophic 56
SuperHyperEdges of a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of high Neutrosophic cardinality 57
consecutive Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges and Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such 58
that they form the Neutrosophic SuperHyperK-Number; and the Neutrosophic power is 59
corresponded to its Neutrosophic coefficient; an Extreme V-SuperHyperK-Number if it’s 60
either of Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperK-Number, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperK-Number, 61
C(N SHG) for an Extreme SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the maximum Extreme 63
cardinality of an Extreme SuperHyperSet S of high Extreme cardinality of the Extreme 64
SuperHyperVertices in the consecutive Extreme sequence of Extreme SuperHyperEdges 65
and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form the Extreme 66
SuperHyperK-Number; a Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperK-Number if it’s either of 67
Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperK-Number, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperK-Number, 68
Neutrosophic cardinality of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of a Neutrosophic 71
Neutrosophic SuperHyperK-Number; an Extreme V-SuperHyperK-Number 74
SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either of Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperK-Number, 75
SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the Extreme SuperHyperPolynomial contains the 78
Extreme coefficients defined as the Extreme number of the maximum Extreme 79
cardinality of the Extreme SuperHyperVertices of an Extreme SuperHyperSet S of high 80
SuperHyperVertices such that they form the Extreme SuperHyperK-Number; and the 82
Extreme power is corresponded to its Extreme coefficient; a Neutrosophic 83
SuperHyperK-Number SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either of Neutrosophic 84
for a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the Neutrosophic 87
Neutrosophic number of the maximum Neutrosophic cardinality of the Neutrosophic 89
SuperHyperVertices of a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of high Neutrosophic 90
cardinality consecutive Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges and Neutrosophic 91
SuperHyperVertices such that they form the Neutrosophic SuperHyperK-Number; and 92
the Neutrosophic power is corresponded to its Neutrosophic coefficient. In this scientific 93
research, new setting is introduced for new SuperHyperNotions, namely, a 94
SuperHyperK-Number and Neutrosophic SuperHyperK-Number. Two different types 95
of SuperHyperDefinitions are debut for them but the research goes further and the 96
SuperHyperNotion, SuperHyperUniform, and SuperHyperClass based on that are 97
well-defined and well-reviewed. The literature review is implemented in the whole of 98
this research. For shining the elegancy and the significancy of this research, the 99
comparison between this SuperHyperNotion with other SuperHyperNotions and 100
fundamental SuperHyperNumbers are featured. The definitions are followed by the 101
examples and the instances thus the clarifications are driven with different tools. The 102
applications are figured out to make sense about the theoretical aspect of this ongoing 103
research. The “Cancer’s Recognition” are the under research to figure out the 104
challenges make sense about ongoing and upcoming research. The special case is up. 105
The cells are viewed in the deemed ways. There are different types of them. Some of 106
them are individuals and some of them are well-modeled by the group of cells. These 107
types are all officially called “SuperHyperVertex” but the relations amid them all 108
officially called “SuperHyperEdge”. The frameworks “SuperHyperGraph” and 109
“Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph” are chosen and elected to research about “Cancer’s 110
Recognition”. Thus these complex and dense SuperHyperModels open up some avenues 111
to research on theoretical segments and “Cancer’s Recognition”. Some avenues are 112
posed to pursue this research. It’s also officially collected in the form of some questions 113
and some problems. Assume a SuperHyperGraph. Assume a SuperHyperGraph. Then 114
δ−SuperHyperK-Number is a maximal of SuperHyperVertices with a maximum 115
cardinality such that either of the following expressions hold for the (Neutrosophic) 116
cardinalities of SuperHyperNeighbors of s ∈ S : there are 117
|S ∩ N (s)| > |S ∩ (V \ N (s))| + δ; and |S ∩ N (s)| < |S ∩ (V \ N (s))| + δ. The first 118
Expression, holds if S is an δ−SuperHyperOffensive. And the second Expression, holds 119
if S is an δ−SuperHyperDefensive; a Neutrosophic δ−SuperHyperK-Number is a 120
maximal Neutrosophic of SuperHyperVertices with maximum Neutrosophic 121
cardinality such that either of the following expressions hold for the Neutrosophic 122
cardinalities of SuperHyperNeighbors of s ∈ S there are: 123
|S ∩ N (s)|N eutrosophic > |S ∩ (V \ N (s))|N eutrosophic + δ; 124
and |S ∩ N (s)|N eutrosophic < |S ∩ (V \ N (s))|N eutrosophic + δ. The first Expression, 125
holds if S is a Neutrosophic δ−SuperHyperOffensive. And the second Expression, holds 126
if S is a Neutrosophic δ−SuperHyperDefensive It’s useful to define a “Neutrosophic” 127
version of a SuperHyperK-Number . Since there’s more ways to get type-results to make 128
a SuperHyperK-Number more understandable. For the sake of having Neutrosophic 129
SuperHyperK-Number, there’s a need to “redefine” the notion of a 130
“SuperHyperK-Number ”. The SuperHyperVertices and the SuperHyperEdges are 131
assigned by the labels from the letters of the alphabets. In this procedure, there’s the 132
usage of the position of labels to assign to the values. Assume a SuperHyperK-Number . 133
It’s redefined a Neutrosophic SuperHyperK-Number if the mentioned Table holds, 134
concerning, “The Values of Vertices, SuperVertices, Edges, HyperEdges, and 135
SuperHyperEdges Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph” with the key points, 136
“The Values of The Vertices & The Number of Position in Alphabet”, “The Values of 137
The SuperVertices&The maximum Values of Its Vertices”, “The Values of The 138
Edges&The maximum Values of Its Vertices”, “The Values of The HyperEdges&The 139
maximum Values of Its Vertices”, “The Values of The SuperHyperEdges&The 140
maximum Values of Its Endpoints”. To get structural examples and instances, I’m 141
going to introduce the next SuperHyperClass of SuperHyperGraph based on a 142
SuperHyperK-Number . It’s the main. It’ll be disciplinary to have the foundation of 143
previous definition in the kind of SuperHyperClass. If there’s a need to have all 144
SuperHyperK-Number until the SuperHyperK-Number, then it’s officially called a 145
“SuperHyperK-Number” but otherwise, it isn’t a SuperHyperK-Number . There are 146
some instances about the clarifications for the main definition titled a 147
“SuperHyperK-Number ”. These two examples get more scrutiny and discernment since 148
there are characterized in the disciplinary ways of the SuperHyperClass based on a 149
SuperHyperK-Number . For the sake of having a Neutrosophic SuperHyperK-Number, 150
there’s a need to “redefine” the notion of a “Neutrosophic SuperHyperK-Number” and 151
a “Neutrosophic SuperHyperK-Number ”. The SuperHyperVertices and the 152
SuperHyperEdges are assigned by the labels from the letters of the alphabets. In this 153
procedure, there’s the usage of the position of labels to assign to the values. Assume a 154
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. It’s redefined “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph” if the 155
intended Table holds. And a SuperHyperK-Number are redefined to a “Neutrosophic 156
SuperHyperK-Number” if the intended Table holds. It’s useful to define “Neutrosophic” 157
version of SuperHyperClasses. Since there’s more ways to get Neutrosophic type-results 158
to make a Neutrosophic SuperHyperK-Number more understandable. Assume a 159
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. There are some Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses if 160
the intended Table holds. Thus SuperHyperPath, SuperHyperK-Number, 161
SuperHyperStar, SuperHyperBipartite, SuperHyperMultiPartite, and 162
SuperHyperWheel, are “Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath”, “Neutrosophic 163
SuperHyperK-Number”, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar”, “Neutrosophic 164
SuperHyperBipartite”, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultiPartite”, and “Neutrosophic 165
SuperHyperWheel” if the intended Table holds. A SuperHyperGraph has a 166
“Neutrosophic SuperHyperK-Number” where it’s the strongest [the maximum 167
Neutrosophic value from all the SuperHyperK-Number amid the maximum value amid 168
all SuperHyperVertices from a SuperHyperK-Number .] SuperHyperK-Number . A 169
graph is a SuperHyperUniform if it’s a SuperHyperGraph and the number of elements 170
of SuperHyperEdges are the same. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. There 171
are some SuperHyperClasses as follows. It’s SuperHyperPath if it’s only one 172
SuperVertex as intersection amid two given SuperHyperEdges with two exceptions; it’s 173
SuperHyperK-Number if it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid two given 174
SuperHyperEdges; it’s SuperHyperStar it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid 175
all SuperHyperEdges; it’s SuperHyperBipartite it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection 176
amid two given SuperHyperEdges and these SuperVertices, forming two separate sets, 177
has no SuperHyperEdge in common; it’s SuperHyperMultiPartite it’s only one 178
SuperVertex as intersection amid two given SuperHyperEdges and these SuperVertices, 179
forming multi separate sets, has no SuperHyperEdge in common; it’s a 180
SuperHyperWheel if it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid two given 181
SuperHyperEdges and one SuperVertex has one SuperHyperEdge with any common 182
SuperVertex. The SuperHyperModel proposes the specific designs and the specific 183
architectures. The SuperHyperModel is officially called “SuperHyperGraph” and 184
“Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph”. In this SuperHyperModel, The “specific” cells and 185
“specific group” of cells are SuperHyperModeled as “SuperHyperVertices” and the 186
common and intended properties between “specific” cells and “specific group” of cells 187
are SuperHyperModeled as “SuperHyperEdges”. Sometimes, it’s useful to have some 188
degrees of determinacy, indeterminacy, and neutrality to have more precise 189
SuperHyperModel which in this case the SuperHyperModel is called “Neutrosophic”. In 190
the future research, the foundation will be based on the “Cancer’s Recognition” and the 191
results and the definitions will be introduced in redeemed ways. The recognition of the 192
cancer in the long-term function. The specific region has been assigned by the model 193
[it’s called SuperHyperGraph] and the long cycle of the move from the cancer is 194
identified by this research. Sometimes the move of the cancer hasn’t be easily identified 195
since there are some determinacy, indeterminacy and neutrality about the moves and 196
the effects of the cancer on that region; this event leads us to choose another model [it’s 197
said to be Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph] to have convenient perception on what’s 198
happened and what’s done. There are some specific models, which are well-known and 199
they’ve got the names, and some SuperHyperGeneral SuperHyperModels. The moves 200
and the traces of the cancer on the complex tracks and between complicated groups of 201
cells could be fantasized by a Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath(-/SuperHyperK-Number, 202
SuperHyperStar, SuperHyperBipartite, SuperHyperMultipartite, SuperHyperWheel). 203
The aim is to find either the longest SuperHyperK-Number or the strongest 204
SuperHyperK-Number in those Neutrosophic SuperHyperModels. For the longest 205
SuperHyperK-Number, called SuperHyperK-Number, and the strongest 206
SuperHyperK-Number, called Neutrosophic SuperHyperK-Number, some general results 207
are introduced. Beyond that in SuperHyperStar, all possible SuperHyperPaths have 208
only two SuperHyperEdges but it’s not enough since it’s essential to have at least three 209
SuperHyperEdges to form any style of a SuperHyperK-Number. There isn’t any 210
formation of any SuperHyperK-Number but literarily, it’s the deformation of any 211
SuperHyperK-Number. It, literarily, deforms and it doesn’t form. A basic familiarity 212
with Neutrosophic SuperHyperK-Number theory, SuperHyperGraphs, and 213
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs theory are proposed. 214
Keywords: Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph, SuperHyperK-Number, Cancer’s 215
Neutrosophic Recognition 216
AMS Subject Classification: 05C17, 05C22, 05E45 217
2 Applied Notions Under The Scrutiny Of The 218
Motivation Of This Scientific Research 219
In this scientific research, there are some ideas in the featured frameworks of 220
motivations. I try to bring the motivations in the narrative ways. Some cells have been 221
faced with some attacks from the situation which is caused by the cancer’s attacks. In 222
this case, there are some embedded analysis on the ongoing situations which in that, the 223
cells could be labelled as some groups and some groups or individuals have excessive 224
labels which all are raised from the behaviors to overcome the cancer’s attacks. In the 225
embedded situations, the individuals of cells and the groups of cells could be considered 226
as “new groups”. Thus it motivates us to find the proper SuperHyperModels for getting 227
more proper analysis on this messy story. I’ve found the SuperHyperModels which are 228
officially called “SuperHyperGraphs” and “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”. In this 229
SuperHyperModel, the cells and the groups of cells are defined as “SuperHyperVertices” 230
and the relations between the individuals of cells and the groups of cells are defined as 231
“SuperHyperEdges”. Thus it’s another motivation for us to do research on this 232
SuperHyperModel based on the “Cancer’s Recognition”. Sometimes, the situations get 233
worst. The situation is passed from the certainty and precise style. Thus it’s the beyond 234
them. There are three descriptions, namely, the degrees of determinacy, indeterminacy 235
and neutrality, for any object based on vague forms, namely, incomplete data, imprecise 236
data, and uncertain analysis. The latter model could be considered on the previous 237
SuperHyperModel. It’s SuperHyperModel. It’s SuperHyperGraph but it’s officially 238
called “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”. The cancer is the disease but the model is 239
going to figure out what’s going on this phenomenon. The special case of this disease is 240
considered and as the consequences of the model, some parameters are used. The cells 241
are under attack of this disease but the moves of the cancer in the special region are the 242
matter of mind. The recognition of the cancer could help to find some treatments for 243
this disease. The SuperHyperGraph and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph are the 244
SuperHyperModels on the “Cancer’s Recognition” and both bases are the background 245
of this research. Sometimes the cancer has been happened on the region, full of cells, 246
groups of cells and embedded styles. In this segment, the SuperHyperModel proposes 247
some SuperHyperNotions based on the connectivities of the moves of the cancer in the 248
forms of alliances’ styles with the formation of the design and the architecture are 249
formally called “ SuperHyperK-Number” in the themes of jargons and buzzwords. The 250
prefix “SuperHyper” refers to the theme of the embedded styles to figure out the 251
background for the SuperHyperNotions. The recognition of the cancer in the long-term 252
function. The specific region has been assigned by the model [it’s called 253
SuperHyperGraph] and the long cycle of the move from the cancer is identified by this 254
research. Sometimes the move of the cancer hasn’t be easily identified since there are 255
some determinacy, indeterminacy and neutrality about the moves and the effects of the 256
cancer on that region; this event leads us to choose another model [it’s said to be 257
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph] to have convenient perception on what’s happened and 258
what’s done. There are some specific models, which are well-known and they’ve got the 259
names, and some general models. The moves and the traces of the cancer on the 260
complex tracks and between complicated groups of cells could be fantasized by a 261
Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath (-/SuperHyperK-Number, SuperHyperStar, 262
SuperHyperBipartite, SuperHyperMultipartite, SuperHyperWheel). The aim is to find 263
either the optimal SuperHyperK-Number or the Neutrosophic SuperHyperK-Number in 264
those Neutrosophic SuperHyperModels. Some general results are introduced. Beyond 265
that in SuperHyperStar, all possible Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath s have only two 266
SuperHyperEdges but it’s not enough since it’s essential to have at least three 267
SuperHyperEdges to form any style of a SuperHyperK-Number. There isn’t any 268
formation of any SuperHyperK-Number but literarily, it’s the deformation of any 269
SuperHyperK-Number. It, literarily, deforms and it doesn’t form. 270
Question 2.1. How to define the SuperHyperNotions and to do research on them to 271
find the “ amount of SuperHyperK-Number” of either individual of cells or the groups of 272
cells based on the fixed cell or the fixed group of cells, extensively, the “amount of 273
SuperHyperK-Number” based on the fixed groups of cells or the fixed groups of group of 274
cells? 275
Question 2.2. What are the best descriptions for the “Cancer’s Recognition” in terms 276
of these messy and dense SuperHyperModels where embedded notions are illustrated? 277
It’s motivation to find notions to use in this dense model is titled 278
“SuperHyperGraphs”. Thus it motivates us to define different types of “ 279
SuperHyperK-Number” and “Neutrosophic SuperHyperK-Number” on 280
“SuperHyperGraph” and “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph”. Then the research has 281
taken more motivations to define SuperHyperClasses and to find some connections amid 282
this SuperHyperNotion with other SuperHyperNotions. It motivates us to get some 283
instances and examples to make clarifications about the framework of this research. The 284
general results and some results about some connections are some avenues to make key 285
point of this research, “Cancer’s Recognition”, more understandable and more clear. 286
The framework of this research is as follows. In the beginning, I introduce basic 287
definitions to clarify about preliminaries. In the subsection “Preliminaries”, initial 288
definitions about SuperHyperGraphs and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph are 289
deeply-introduced and in-depth-discussed. The elementary concepts are clarified and 290
illustrated completely and sometimes review literature are applied to make sense about 291
what’s going to figure out about the upcoming sections. The main definitions and their 292
clarifications alongside some results about new notions, SuperHyperK-Number and 293
Neutrosophic SuperHyperK-Number, are figured out in sections “ 294
SuperHyperK-Number” and “Neutrosophic SuperHyperK-Number”. In the sense of 295
tackling on getting results and in K-Number to make sense about continuing the 296
research, the ideas of SuperHyperUniform and Neutrosophic SuperHyperUniform are 297
introduced and as their consequences, corresponded SuperHyperClasses are figured out 298
to debut what’s done in this section, titled “Results on SuperHyperClasses” and 299
“Results on Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses”. As going back to origin of the notions, 300
there are some smart steps toward the common notions to extend the new notions in 301
new frameworks, SuperHyperGraph and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph, in the sections 302
“Results on SuperHyperClasses” and “Results on Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses”. 303
The starter research about the general SuperHyperRelations and as concluding and 304
closing section of theoretical research are contained in the section “General Results”. 305
Some general SuperHyperRelations are fundamental and they are well-known as 306
fundamental SuperHyperNotions as elicited and discussed in the sections, “General 307
Results”, “ SuperHyperK-Number”, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperK-Number”, “Results on 308
SuperHyperClasses” and “Results on Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses”. There are 309
curious questions about what’s done about the SuperHyperNotions to make sense about 310
excellency of this research and going to figure out the word “best” as the description 311
and adjective for this research as presented in section, “ SuperHyperK-Number”. The 312
keyword of this research debut in the section “Applications in Cancer’s Recognition” 313
with two cases and subsections “Case 1: The Initial Steps Toward SuperHyperBipartite 314
as SuperHyperModel” and “Case 2: The Increasing Steps Toward 315
SuperHyperMultipartite as SuperHyperModel”. In the section, “Open Problems”, there 316
are some scrutiny and discernment on what’s done and what’s happened in this research 317
in the terms of “questions” and “problems” to make sense to figure out this research in 318
featured style. The advantages and the limitations of this research alongside about 319
what’s done in this research to make sense and to get sense about what’s figured out are 320
included in the section, “Conclusion and Closing Remarks”. 321
3 Neutrosophic Preliminaries Of This Scientific 322
Research On the Redeemed Ways 323
In this section, the basic material in this scientific research, is referred to [Single Valued 324
Neutrosophic Set](Ref. [96],Definition 2.2,p.2), [Neutrosophic Set](Ref. [96],Definition 325
2.1,p.1), [Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)](Ref. [96],Definition 2.5,p.2), 326
[Characterization of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)](Ref. [96],Definition 327
2.7,p.3), [t-norm](Ref. [96], Definition 2.7, p.3), and [Characterization of the 328
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)](Ref. [96],Definition 2.7,p.3), [Neutrosophic 329
Strength of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperPaths] (Ref. [96],Definition 5.3,p.7), and 330
[Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE)] 331
(Ref. [96],Definition 5.4,p.7). Also, the new ideas and their clarifications are addressed 332
to Ref. [96]. 333
In this subsection, the basic material which is used in this scientific research, is 334
presented. Also, the new ideas and their clarifications are elicited. 335
Definition 3.1 (Neutrosophic Set). (Ref. [96],Definition 2.1,p.1). 336
Let X be a space of points (objects) with generic elements in X denoted by x; then

the Neutrosophic set A (NS A) is an object having the form
A = {< x : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) >, x ∈ X}
+
where the functions T, I, F : X →]− 0, 1 [ define respectively the a
truth-membership function, an indeterminacy-membership function, and a
falsity-membership function of the element x ∈ X to the set A with the condition
−
0 ≤ TA (x) + IA (x) + FA (x) ≤ 3+ .
The functions TA (x), IA (x) and FA (x) are real standard or nonstandard subsets of 337
+
]− 0, 1 [. 338
Definition 3.2 (Single Valued Neutrosophic Set). (Ref. [96],Definition 2.2,p.2). 339
Let X be a space of points (objects) with generic elements in X denoted by x. A

single valued Neutrosophic set A (SVNS A) is characterized by truth-membership
function TA (x), an indeterminacy-membership function IA (x), and a falsity-membership
function FA (x). For each point x in X, TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) ∈ [0, 1]. A SVNS A can be
written as
A = {< x : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) >, x ∈ X}.
Definition 3.3. The degree of truth-membership,

indeterminacy-membership and falsity-membership of the subset X ⊂ A of
the single valued Neutrosophic set A = {< x : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) >, x ∈ X}:
TA (X) = min[TA (vi ), TA (vj )]vi ,vj ∈X ,
IA (X) = min[IA (vi ), IA (vj )]vi ,vj ∈X ,

and FA (X) = min[FA (vi ), FA (vj )]vi ,vj ∈X .
Definition 3.4. The support of X ⊂ A of the single valued Neutrosophic set
A = {< x : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) >, x ∈ X}:
supp(X) = {x ∈ X : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) > 0}.
Definition 3.5 (Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)). (Ref. [96],Definition 340
2.5,p.2). 341
Assume V 0 is a given set. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is an 342
K-Numbered pair S = (V, E), where 343
(i) V = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vn } a finite set of finite single valued Neutrosophic subsets of V 0 ; 344
(ii) V = {(Vi , TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), FV 0 (Vi )) : TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), FV 0 (Vi ) ≥ 0}, (i = 345
1, 2, . . . , n); 346
(iii) E = {E1 , E2 , . . . , En0 } a finite set of finite single valued Neutrosophic subsets of 347
V; 348
(iv) E = {(Ei0 , TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 )) : TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 ) ≥ 0}, (i0 = 349
1, 2, . . . , n0 ); 350
(v) Vi 6= ∅, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n); 351
(vi) Ei0 6= ∅, (i0 = 1, 2, . . . , n0 ); 352
P
(vii) i supp(Vi ) = V, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n); 353
0 0
P
(viii) i0 supp(Ei ) = V, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n );
0 354
(ix) and the following conditions hold:
TV0 (Ei0 ) ≤ min[TV 0 (Vi ), TV 0 (Vj )]Vi ,Vj ∈Ei0 ,
IV0 (Ei0 ) ≤ min[IV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vj )]Vi ,Vj ∈Ei0 ,

and FV0 (Ei0 ) ≤ min[FV 0 (Vi ), FV 0 (Vj )]Vi ,Vj ∈Ei0
where i0 = 1, 2, . . . , n0 . 355
Here the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE) Ej 0 and the Neutrosophic 356
SuperHyperVertices (NSHV) Vj are single valued Neutrosophic sets. TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), 357
and FV 0 (Vi ) denote the degree of truth-membership, the degree of 358
indeterminacy-membership and the degree of falsity-membership the Neutrosophic 359
SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vi to the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) V. 360
TV0 (Ei0 ), TV0 (Ei0 ), and TV0 (Ei0 ) denote the degree of truth-membership, the degree of 361
indeterminacy-membership and the degree of falsity-membership of the Neutrosophic 362
SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) Ei0 to the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) E. Thus, 363
the ii0 th element of the incidence matrix of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) 364
are of the form (Vi , TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 )), the sets V and E are crisp sets. 365
Definition 3.6 (Characterization of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)). 366
(Ref. [96],Definition 2.7,p.3). 367
S = (V, E). The Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE) Ei0 and the Neutrosophic 369
SuperHyperVertices (NSHV) Vi of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S = (V, E) 370
could be characterized as follow-up items. 371
(i) If |Vi | = 1, then Vi is called vertex; 372
(ii) if |Vi | ≥ 1, then Vi is called SuperVertex; 373
(iii) if for all Vi s are incident in Ei0 , |Vi | = 1, and |Ei0 | = 2, then Ei0 is called edge; 374
(iv) if for all Vi s are incident in Ei0 , |Vi | = 1, and |Ei0 | ≥ 2, then Ei0 is called 375
HyperEdge; 376
(v) if there’s a Vi is incident in Ei0 such that |Vi | ≥ 1, and |Ei0 | = 2, then Ei0 is called 377
SuperEdge; 378
(vi) if there’s a Vi is incident in Ei0 such that |Vi | ≥ 1, and |Ei0 | ≥ 2, then Ei0 is called 379
SuperHyperEdge. 380
If we choose different types of binary operations, then we could get hugely diverse 381
types of general forms of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG). 382
Definition 3.7 (t-norm). (Ref. [96], Definition 2.7, p.3). 383
A binary operation ⊗ : [0, 1] × [0, 1] → [0, 1] is a t-norm if it satisfies the following 384
for x, y, z, w ∈ [0, 1]: 385
(i) 1 ⊗ x = x; 386
(ii) x ⊗ y = y ⊗ x; 387
(iii) x ⊗ (y ⊗ z) = (x ⊗ y) ⊗ z; 388
(iv) If w ≤ x and y ≤ z then w ⊗ y ≤ x ⊗ z. 389
Definition 3.8. The degree of truth-membership, indeterminacy-membership

and falsity-membership of the subset X ⊂ A of the single valued Neutrosophic set
A = {< x : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) >, x ∈ X} (with respect to t-norm Tnorm ):
TA (X) = Tnorm [TA (vi ), TA (vj )]vi ,vj ∈X ,
IA (X) = Tnorm [IA (vi ), IA (vj )]vi ,vj ∈X ,

and FA (X) = Tnorm [FA (vi ), FA (vj )]vi ,vj ∈X .
Definition 3.9. The support of X ⊂ A of the single valued Neutrosophic set
A = {< x : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) >, x ∈ X}:
supp(X) = {x ∈ X : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) > 0}.
Definition 3.10. (General Forms of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)). 390
Assume V 0 is a given set. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is an 391
K-Numbered pair S = (V, E), where 392
(i) V = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vn } a finite set of finite single valued Neutrosophic subsets of V 0 ; 393
(ii) V = {(Vi , TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), FV 0 (Vi )) : TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), FV 0 (Vi ) ≥ 0}, (i = 394
1, 2, . . . , n); 395
(iii) E = {E1 , E2 , . . . , En0 } a finite set of finite single valued Neutrosophic subsets of 396
V; 397
(iv) E = {(Ei0 , TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 )) : TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 ) ≥ 0}, (i0 = 398
1, 2, . . . , n0 ); 399
(v) Vi 6= ∅, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n); 400
(vi) Ei0 6= ∅, (i0 = 1, 2, . . . , n0 ); 401
P
(vii) i supp(Vi ) = V, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n); 402
0 0
P
(viii) i0 supp(Ei ) = V, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n ).
0 403
Here the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE) Ej 0 and the Neutrosophic 404
SuperHyperVertices (NSHV) Vj are single valued Neutrosophic sets. TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), 405
and FV 0 (Vi ) denote the degree of truth-membership, the degree of 406
indeterminacy-membership and the degree of falsity-membership the Neutrosophic 407
SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vi to the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) V. 408
TV0 (Ei0 ), TV0 (Ei0 ), and TV0 (Ei0 ) denote the degree of truth-membership, the degree of 409
indeterminacy-membership and the degree of falsity-membership of the Neutrosophic 410
SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) Ei0 to the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) E. Thus, 411
the ii0 th element of the incidence matrix of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) 412
are of the form (Vi , TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 )), the sets V and E are crisp sets. 413
Definition 3.11 (Characterization of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)). 414
S = (V, E). The Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE) Ei0 and the Neutrosophic 417
SuperHyperVertices (NSHV) Vi of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S = (V, E) 418
(i) If |Vi | = 1, then Vi is called vertex; 420
(ii) if |Vi | ≥ 1, then Vi is called SuperVertex; 421
(iii) if for all Vi s are incident in Ei0 , |Vi | = 1, and |Ei0 | = 2, then Ei0 is called edge; 422
(iv) if for all Vi s are incident in Ei0 , |Vi | = 1, and |Ei0 | ≥ 2, then Ei0 is called 423
HyperEdge; 424
(v) if there’s a Vi is incident in Ei0 such that |Vi | ≥ 1, and |Ei0 | = 2, then Ei0 is called 425
SuperEdge; 426
(vi) if there’s a Vi is incident in Ei0 such that |Vi | ≥ 1, and |Ei0 | ≥ 2, then Ei0 is called 427
SuperHyperEdge. 428
This SuperHyperModel is too messy and too dense. Thus there’s a need to have 429
some restrictions and conditions on SuperHyperGraph. The special case of this 430
SuperHyperGraph makes the patterns and regularities. 431
Definition 3.12. A graph is SuperHyperUniform if it’s SuperHyperGraph and the 432
number of elements of SuperHyperEdges are the same. 433
To get more visions on SuperHyperUniform, the some SuperHyperClasses are 434
introduced. It makes to have SuperHyperUniform more understandable. 435
Definition 3.13. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. There are some 436
SuperHyperClasses as follows. 437
(i). It’s Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath if it’s only one SuperVertex as 438
intersection amid two given SuperHyperEdges with two exceptions; 439
(ii). it’s SuperHyperCycle if it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid two 440
given SuperHyperEdges; 441
(iii). it’s SuperHyperStar it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid all 442
SuperHyperEdges; 443
(iv). it’s SuperHyperBipartite it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid two 444
given SuperHyperEdges and these SuperVertices, forming two separate sets, has 445
no SuperHyperEdge in common; 446
(v). it’s SuperHyperMultiPartite it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid 447
two given SuperHyperEdges and these SuperVertices, forming multi separate sets, 448
has no SuperHyperEdge in common; 449
(vi). it’s SuperHyperWheel if it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid two 450
given SuperHyperEdges and one SuperVertex has one SuperHyperEdge with any 451
common SuperVertex. 452
Definition 3.14. Let an K-Numbered pair S = (V, E) be a Neutrosophic

SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S. Then a sequence of Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices
(NSHV) and Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE)
V1 , E1 , V2 , E2 , V3 , . . . , Vs−1 , Es−1 , Vs
is called a Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic 453
SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) V1 to Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vs if either 454
of following conditions hold: 455
(i) Vi , Vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 456
(ii) there’s a vertex vi ∈ Vi such that vi , Vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 457
(iii) there’s a SuperVertex Vi0 ∈ Vi such that Vi0 , Vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 458
(iv) there’s a vertex vi+1 ∈ Vi+1 such that Vi , vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 459
0 0
(v) there’s a SuperVertex Vi+1 ∈ Vi+1 such that Vi , Vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 460
(vi) there are a vertex vi ∈ Vi and a vertex vi+1 ∈ Vi+1 such that vi , vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 461
0 0
(vii) there are a vertex vi ∈ Vi and a SuperVertex Vi+1 ∈ Vi+1 such that vi , Vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 462
(viii) there are a SuperVertex Vi0 ∈ Vi and a vertex vi+1 ∈ Vi+1 such that Vi0 , vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 463
(ix) there are a SuperVertex Vi0 ∈ Vi and a SuperVertex Vi+1

0
∈ Vi+1 such that 464
0 0
Vi , Vi+1 ∈ Ei0 . 465
Definition 3.15. (Characterization of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperPaths). 466
Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is an K-Numbered pair

S = (V, E). a Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic
SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) V1 to Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vs is
sequence of Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices (NSHV) and Neutrosophic
SuperHyperEdges (NSHE)
V1 , E1 , V2 , E2 , V3 , . . . , Vs−1 , Es−1 , Vs ,
(i) If for all Vi , Ej 0 , |Vi | = 1, |Ej 0 | = 2, then NSHP is called path; 468
(ii) if for all Ej 0 , |Ej 0 | = 2, and there’s Vi , |Vi | ≥ 1, then NSHP is called SuperPath; 469
(iii) if for all Vi , Ej 0 , |Vi | = 1, |Ej 0 | ≥ 2, then NSHP is called HyperPath; 470
(iv) if there are Vi , Ej 0 , |Vi | ≥ 1, |Ej 0 | ≥ 2, then NSHP is called Neutrosophic 471
SuperHyperPath . 472
Definition 3.16 (Neutrosophic Strength of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperPaths). 473
Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is an K-Numbered pair

S = (V, E). A Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic
SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) V1 to Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vs is
sequence of Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices (NSHV) and Neutrosophic
SuperHyperEdges (NSHE)
V1 , E1 , V2 , E2 , V3 , . . . , Vs−1 , Es−1 , Vs ,
have 475
(i) Neutrosophic t-strength (min{T (Vi )}, m, n)si=1 ; 476
(ii) Neutrosophic i-strength (m, min{I(Vi )}, n)si=1 ; 477
(iii) Neutrosophic f-strength (m, n, min{F (Vi )})si=1 ; 478
(iv) Neutrosophic strength (min{T (Vi )}, min{I(Vi )}, min{F (Vi )})si=1 . 479
Definition 3.17 (Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges 480
(NSHE)). (Ref. [96],Definition 5.4,p.7). 481
Then E is called 484
(ix) Neutrosophic t-connective if T (E) ≥ maximum number of Neutrosophic 485
t-strength of SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex 486
(NSHV) Vi to Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vj where 1 ≤ i, j ≤ s; 487
(x) Neutrosophic i-connective if I(E) ≥ maximum number of Neutrosophic 488
i-strength of SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex 489
(xi) Neutrosophic f-connective if F (E) ≥ maximum number of Neutrosophic 491
f-strength of SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex 492
(xii) Neutrosophic connective if (T (E), I(E), F (E)) ≥ maximum number of 494
Neutrosophic strength of SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic 495
SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vi to Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vj 496
where 1 ≤ i, j ≤ s. 497
Definition 3.18. (Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic 498
SuperHyperK-Number). 499
S = (V, E). Consider a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vs } and 501
E 0 = {E1 , E2 , . . . , Ez }. Then either V 0 or E 0 is called 502
(i) Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperK-Number if 503
|E 0 | = k, ∀Ea ∈ EN SHG \ E 0 , ∃Eb ∈ E 0 , ∃Vc ∈ V, Vc ∈ Ea , Eb ; 504
(ii) Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperK-Number if 505
|E 0 | = k, ∀Ea ∈ EN SHG \ E 0 , ∃Eb ∈ E 0 , ∃Vc ∈ V, Vc ∈ Ea , Eb ; and 506
|Ei |NEUTROSOPIC CARDINALITY = |Ej |NEUTROSOPIC CARDINALITY ; 507
(iii) Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperK-Number if 508
|V 0 | = k, ∀Va ∈ VN SHG \ V 0 , ∃Vb ∈ V 0 , ∃Ec ∈ E, Va , Vb ∈ Vc ; 509
(iv) Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperK-Number if 510
|V 0 | = k, ∀Va ∈ VN SHG \ V 0 , ∃Vb ∈ V 0 , ∃Ec ∈ E, Va , Vb ∈ Vc ; and 511
|Vi |NEUTROSOPIC CARDINALITY = |Vj |NEUTROSOPIC CARDINALITY ; 512
(v) Neutrosophic SuperHyperK-Number if it’s either of Neutrosophic 513
v-SuperHyperK-Number, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperK-Number. 515
Definition 3.19. ((Neutrosophic) SuperHyperK-Number). 516
(i) an Extreme SuperHyperK-Number if it’s either of Neutrosophic 520
v-SuperHyperK-Number, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperK-Number and 522
C(N SHG) for an Extreme SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the maximum 523
Extreme cardinality of an Extreme SuperHyperSet S of high Extreme cardinality 524
of the Extreme SuperHyperEdges in the consecutive Extreme sequence of Extreme 525
SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form the 526
Extreme SuperHyperK-Number; 527
(ii) a Neutrosophic SuperHyperK-Number if it’s either of Neutrosophic 528
Neutrosophic SuperHyperK-Number; 535
(iii) an Extreme SuperHyperK-Number SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either 536
of Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperK-Number, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperK-Number, 537
Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperK-Number, and Neutrosophic 538
rv-SuperHyperK-Number and C(N SHG) for an Extreme SuperHyperGraph 539
N SHG : (V, E) is the Extreme SuperHyperPolynomial contains the Extreme 540
coefficients defined as the Extreme number of the maximum Extreme cardinality 541
of the Extreme SuperHyperEdges of an Extreme SuperHyperSet S of high 542
SuperHyperVertices such that they form the Extreme SuperHyperK-Number; and 544
the Extreme power is corresponded to its Extreme coefficient; 545
(iv) a Neutrosophic SuperHyperK-Number SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s 546
either of Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperK-Number, Neutrosophic 547
re-SuperHyperK-Number, Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperK-Number, and 548
Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperK-Number and C(N SHG) for a Neutrosophic 549
SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperPolynomial 550
contains the Neutrosophic coefficients defined as the Neutrosophic number of the 551
maximum Neutrosophic cardinality of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges of a 552
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of high Neutrosophic cardinality consecutive 553
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges and Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that 554
they form the Neutrosophic SuperHyperK-Number; and the Neutrosophic power is 555
corresponded to its Neutrosophic coefficient; 556
(v) an Extreme V-SuperHyperK-Number if it’s either of Neutrosophic 557
of the Extreme SuperHyperVertices in the consecutive Extreme sequence of 562
Extreme SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form 563
the Extreme SuperHyperK-Number; 564
(vi) a Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperK-Number if it’s either of Neutrosophic 565
Neutrosophic cardinality of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of a 569
they form the Neutrosophic SuperHyperK-Number; 572
(vii) an Extreme V-SuperHyperK-Number SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s 573
SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the Extreme SuperHyperPolynomial 577
contains the Extreme coefficients defined as the Extreme number of the maximum 578
Extreme cardinality of the Extreme SuperHyperVertices of an Extreme 579
SuperHyperSet S of high Extreme cardinality consecutive Extreme 580
Extreme SuperHyperK-Number; and the Extreme power is corresponded to its 582
Extreme coefficient; 583
(viii) a Neutrosophic SuperHyperK-Number SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s 584
Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperK-Number and C(N SHG) for a Neutrosophic 587
maximum Neutrosophic cardinality of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of a 590
they form the Neutrosophic SuperHyperK-Number; and the Neutrosophic power is 593
corresponded to its Neutrosophic coefficient. 594
Definition 3.20. ((Extreme/Neutrosophic)δ−SuperHyperK-Number). 595
S = (V, E). Then 597
(i) an δ−SuperHyperK-Number is a Neutrosophic kind of Neutrosophic 598
SuperHyperK-Number such that either of the following expressions hold for the 599
Table 1. The Values of Vertices, SuperVertices, Edges, HyperEdges, and SuperHy-

perEdges Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph Mentioned in the Definition
(3.23)
The Values of The Vertices The Number of Position in Alphabet
The Values of The SuperVertices The maximum Values of Its Vertices
The Values of The Edges The maximum Values of Its Vertices
The Values of The HyperEdges The maximum Values of Its Vertices
The Values of The SuperHyperEdges The maximum Values of Its Endpoints
Neutrosophic cardinalities of SuperHyperNeighbors of s ∈ S : 600
|S ∩ N (s)| > |S ∩ (V \ N (s))| + δ;

|S ∩ N (s)| < |S ∩ (V \ N (s))| + δ.
The Expression (3.1), holds if S is an δ−SuperHyperOffensive. And the 601
Expression (3.1), holds if S is an δ−SuperHyperDefensive; 602
(ii) a Neutrosophic δ−SuperHyperK-Number is a Neutrosophic kind of 603
Neutrosophic SuperHyperK-Number such that either of the following 604
Neutrosophic expressions hold for the Neutrosophic cardinalities of 605
SuperHyperNeighbors of s ∈ S : 606
|S ∩ N (s)|N eutrosophic > |S ∩ (V \ N (s))|N eutrosophic + δ;

|S ∩ N (s)|N eutrosophic < |S ∩ (V \ N (s))|N eutrosophic + δ.
The Expression (3.1), holds if S is a Neutrosophic δ−SuperHyperOffensive. 607
And the Expression (3.1), holds if S is a Neutrosophic 608
δ−SuperHyperDefensive. 609
For the sake of having a Neutrosophic SuperHyperK-Number, there’s a need to 610
“redefine” the notion of “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph”. The SuperHyperVertices 611
and the SuperHyperEdges are assigned by the labels from the letters of the alphabets. 612
In this procedure, there’s the usage of the position of labels to assign to the values. 613
Definition 3.21. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is an 614
K-Numbered pair S = (V, E). It’s redefined Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph if 615
the Table (1) holds. 616
It’s useful to define a “Neutrosophic” version of SuperHyperClasses. Since there’s 617
more ways to get Neutrosophic type-results to make a Neutrosophic more 618
understandable. 619
Definition 3.22. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is an 620
K-Numbered pair S = (V, E). There are some Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses if 621
the Table (2) holds. Thus Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath , SuperHyperK-Number, 622
SuperHyperStar, SuperHyperBipartite, SuperHyperMultiPartite, and 623
SuperHyperWheel, are Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath, Neutrosophic 624
SuperHyperCycle, Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar, Neutrosophic 625
SuperHyperBipartite, Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultiPartite, and 626
Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel if the Table (2) holds. 627
It’s useful to define a “Neutrosophic” version of a Neutrosophic 628
SuperHyperK-Number. Since there’s more ways to get type-results to make a 629
Neutrosophic SuperHyperK-Number more Neutrosophicly understandable. 630

perEdges Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph, Mentioned in the Definition
(3.22)

perEdges Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph Mentioned in the Definition
(3.23)
For the sake of having a Neutrosophic SuperHyperK-Number, there’s a need to 631
“redefine” the Neutrosophic notion of “Neutrosophic SuperHyperK-Number”. The 632
SuperHyperVertices and the SuperHyperEdges are assigned by the labels from the 633
letters of the alphabets. In this procedure, there’s the usage of the position of labels to 634
assign to the values. 635
Definition 3.23. Assume a SuperHyperK-Number. It’s redefined a Neutrosophic 636
SuperHyperK-Number if the Table (3) holds. 637
4 Neutrosophic SuperHyperK-Number But As 638
The Extensions Excerpt From Dense And Super 639
Forms 640
Example 4.1. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is an 641
K-Numbered pair S = (V, E) in the mentioned Neutrosophic Figures in every 642
Neutrosophic items. 643
• On the Figure (1), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic 644
SuperHyperK-Number, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly 645
straightforward. E1 and E3 are some empty Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges but 646
E2 is a loop Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge and E4 is a Neutrosophic 647
SuperHyperEdge. Thus in the terms of Neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighbor, 648
there’s only one Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge, namely, E4 . The Neutrosophic 649
SuperHyperVertex, V3 is Neutrosophic isolated means that there’s no 650
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge has it as a Neutrosophic endpoint. Thus the 651
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, V3 , is excluded in every given Neutrosophic 652
Figure 1. The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions

of Neutrosophic SuperHyperK-Number in the Neutrosophic Example (16.3)
SuperHyperK-Number. 653
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperK-Number = {Ei }i6=2 .

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperK-Number SuperHyperPolynomial = 2z 3 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperK-Number = {Ei }4i=1 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperK-Number SuperHyperPolynomial = z 4 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperK-Number = {Vi }i6=1,2 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperK-Number SuperHyperPolynomial = 3z 2 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperK-Number = {Vi }i6=1 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperK-Number = {Vi }4i=1 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperK-Number SuperHyperPolynomial = z 4 .
654
straightforward. E1 , E2 and E3 are some empty Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges 657
but E4 is a Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge. Thus in the terms of Neutrosophic 658
SuperHyperNeighbor, there’s only one Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge, namely, 659
E4 . The Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, V3 is Neutrosophic isolated means that 660
there’s no Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge has it as a Neutrosophic endpoint. Thus 661
the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, V3 , is excluded in every given Neutrosophic 662


664
straightforward. 667

668

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperK-Number = {Ei }i6=2,5 .

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperK-Number SuperHyperPolynomial = 4z 3 .C(N SHG)Neutrosop
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperK-Number = {V3 , O}
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperK-Number SuperHyperPolynomial
= 5 × 3z 2 .
...
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperK-Number = {Vi }10
i=1 .
672

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperK-Number = {E2 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperK-Number SuperHyperPolynomial = 4z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperK-Number = {E1 , E2 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperK-Number SuperHyperPolynomial
= |EN SHG | choose twoz 2 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperK-Number
= {E1 , E2 , E3 }.
= four choose threez 3 .
= {E1 , E2 , E3 , E4 }.
= z4.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperK-Number = {V5 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperK-Number SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
...
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperK-Number
|V
N SHG |
= {Vi }i=1 .
= z |VN SHG | .
676


= {E3i+1 , E3j+23 }3i,j=0 .
= 3 × 3z 8 .
...
= {Ei }22
i=1 .
= z 22 .
= {V3i+1 , V3j+11 }3i,j=0 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-Quasi-SuperHyperK-Number SuperHyperPolynomial
= 3 × 3z 8 .
...
= {Vi }22
i=1 .
= z 22 .
680

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperK-Number =

{E15 , E16 , E17 }.
= 6 × 5 × 3z 3 .
...
{Ei }17
i=1 .
= z 17 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperK-Number =
{V12 , V6 , V8 }.
= 5 × 5 × 4z 3 .
...
{Vi }14
i=1 .
= z 14 .
684


{E15 , E16 , E17 }.
= 6 × 5 × 3z 3 .
{Ei }4i=1 .
= z4.
{V12 , V6 , V8 }.
= 5 × 5 × 4z 3 .
...
{Vi }14
i=1 .
= z 14 .
688


= {E3i+1 , E3j+23 }3i,j=0 .
= 3 × 3z 8 .
...
= {Ei }23
i=1 .
= z 23 .
= {V3i+1 , V3j+11 }3i,j=0 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-Quasi-SuperHyperK-Number SuperHyperPolynomial
= 3 × 3z 8 .
...
= {Vi }22
i=1 .
= z 22 .
692


{E15 , E16 , E17 }.
= 6 × 5 × 3z 3 .
...
{Ei }7i=1 .
= z7.
{V12 , V6 , V8 }.
= 5 × 5 × 4z 3 .
...
{Vi }14
i=1 .
= z 14 .
696
Figure 10. The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Neutrosophic

Notions of Neutrosophic SuperHyperK-Number in the Neutrosophic Example (16.3)

{E1 , E3 }.
= z2.
...
{Ei 8i=1 }.
= z8.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperK-Number = {V1 , V6 }.
= 3 × 3z 2 .
...
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperK-Number = {Vi 6i=1 }.
= z6.
700


C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperK-Number SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
...
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperK-Number = {Ei 6i=1 }.
= {Vi }i6=4,6,9,10 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperK-Number SuperHyperPolynomial =
= 2 × 2 × 2 × 2 × 2z 5 .
...
= {Vi 10
i=1 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperK-Number SuperHyperPolynomial =
= z 10 .
704


{E1 , E3 }.
= z2.
...
{Ei 10
i=1 }.
= z 10 .
= 3 × 3z 2 .
...
= z6.
708


C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperK-Number SuperHyperPolynomial = 2z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperK-Number = {V1 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperK-Number SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperK-Number SuperHyperPolynomial = 2z 2 .C(N SHG)Neutros
712

...
...


716

...
...
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperK-Number = {Vi 22
i=1 }.
720


...
= {V2 , V7 , V17 , V27 }.
= 8 × 5 × 2z 4 .
...
i=1 }.
724


...
= {V2 , V7 , V17 , V27 }.
= 8 × 5 × 2z 4 .
...
i=1 }.
728


= {E3i+1 i=03 }.
= 3z 4 .
...
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperK-Number = {Ei 12
i=1 }.
= {V3i+1 i=03 }.
= 3z 4 .
...
i=1 }.
732


= {E6 }.
= 10z.
...
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperK-Number = {Ei 10
i=1 }.
= {V1 }.
= z.
...
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperK-Number = {Vi si=1 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperK-Number SuperHyperPolynomial = z s .
736


= {E2 }.
= 2z.
...
= {V1 }.
= 10z.
...
i=1 }.
740



= {E2 , E4 }.
= 4z 2 .
...
= {V3 , V6 }.
= 5z 2 .
...
744
5 The Neutrosophic Departures on The Theoretical 745
Results Toward Theoretical Motivations 746
The previous Neutrosophic approach apply on the upcoming Neutrosophic results on 747
Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses. 748
Proposition 5.1. Assume a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath ESHP : (V, E). 749
Then 750

= {E3i+1 |EN SHG | }.
i=0 3

|EN SHG |
= 3z 3 .
...
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperK-Number = {Ei si=1 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperK-Number SuperHyperPolynomial = z s .
EXT ERN AL
= {V3i+1 |EN SHG | }.
i=0 3

|EN SHG |
= 3z 3 .
Proof. Let 751
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
V |EN SHG |
, E |EN SHG |
3 3
752
P :
E1 , V1EXT ERN AL ,
E2 , V2EXT ERN AL ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
E |EN SHG | , V |EN SHG |
3 3
be a longest path taken from a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath 753
ESHP : (V, E). There’s a new way to redefine as 754
ViEXT ERN AL ∼ VjEXT ERN AL ≡

∃!Ez ∈ EESHG:(V,E) , ViEXT ERN AL , VjEXT ERN AL ∈ Ez ≡
∃!Ez ∈ EESHG:(V,E) , {ViEXT ERN AL , VjEXT ERN AL } ⊆ Ez .
The term “EXTERNAL” implies |N (ViEXT ERN AL )| ≥ |N (Vj )| where Vj is 755
corresponded to ViEXT ERN AL in the literatures of SuperHyperK-Number. The latter is 756
Example 5.2. In the Figure (23), the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath 758
ESHP : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, in the 759
Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (23), is the SuperHyperK-Number. 760
Figure 23. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath Associated to the Notions of Neutrosophic

SuperHyperK-Number in the Example (16.5)
Proposition 5.3. Assume a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle ESHC : (V, E). 761
Then 762

|EN SHG |
= {E3i+1 i=0 3 }.
|EN SHG |
= 3z 3 .
...
EXT ERN AL
= {V3i+1 |EN SHG | }.
i=0 3

|EN SHG |
= 3z 3 .
Proof. Let 763
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
V |EN SHG |
, E |EN SHG |
3 3
Figure 24. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions

764
P :
E1 , V1EXT ERN AL ,
E2 , V2EXT ERN AL ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
E |EN SHG | , V |EN SHG |
3 3
be a longest path taken from a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle 765
ESHC : (V, E). There’s a new way to redefine as 766

Example 5.4. In the Figure (24), the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle 770
N SHC : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The obtained Neutrosophic 771
SuperHyperSet, in the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (24), is the Neutrosophic 772
Proposition 5.5. Assume a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar ESHS : (V, E). 774
Then 775
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperK-Number = {Ei }.

= |EN SHG |z.
...
C(NSHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperK-Number 776
={CENTER}. 777
C(NSHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperK-Number SuperHyperPolynomial 778
=z. 779
C(NSHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperK-Number = {Vi si=1 }. 780
C(NSHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperK-Number SuperHyperPolynomial = z s . 781
Proof. Let 782
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
CEN T ER, E2
783
P :
E1 , V1EXT ERN AL ,
E2 , CEN T ER
be a longest path taken a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar ESHS : (V, E). 784
There’s a new way to redefine as 785

Example 5.6. In the Figure (25), the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar 789
ESHS : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, 790
by the Algorithm in previous Neutrosophic result, of the Neutrosophic 791
SuperHyperVertices of the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar ESHS : (V, E), in 792
the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (25), is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperK-Number. 793
Proposition 5.7. Assume a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite 794
Figure 25. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions of

Neutrosophic SuperHyperK-Number in the Neutrosophic Example (16.9)
ESHB : (V, E). Then 795

= {EiEi ∈Pi ||Pi |=minPj ∈EN SHG |Pj | }.
= (|{Pi | |Pi | = min |Pj |}|)z |Pi |=minPj ∈EN SHG |Pj | .
Pj ∈EN SHG
...
={ViVi ∈Pi ||Pi |=minPj ∈VN SHG |Pj | }. 797
|Pi |=minPj ∈EN SHG |Pj |

=(—{Pi | |Pi | = minPj ∈EN SHG |Pj |}|)z . 799
s
C(NSHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperK-Number SuperHyperPolynomial = z . 801
Proof. Let 802
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
V|Pi |=minP ∈E |Pj | , E|Pi |=minPj ∈EN SHG |Pj | .
j N SHG
803
P :
E1 , V1EXT ERN AL ,
E2 , V2EXT ERN AL ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
E|Pi |=minPj ∈EN SHG |Pj | , V|Pi |=minP ∈E |Pj |
j N SHG
is a longest path taken from a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite 804
ESHB : (V, E). There’s a new way to redefine as 805

straightforward. Then there’s no at least one SuperHyperK-Number. Thus the notion of 808
quasi may be up but the SuperHyperNotions based on SuperHyperK-Number could be 809
applied. There are only two SuperHyperParts. Thus every SuperHyperPart could have 810
one SuperHyperVertex as the representative in the 811
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
is a longest SuperHyperK-Number taken from a connected Neutrosophic 812
SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E). Thus only some SuperHyperVertices and only 813
minimum-Neutrosophic-of-SuperHyperPart SuperHyperEdges are attained in any 814
solution 815
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
The latter is straightforward. 816
Example 5.8. In the Neutrosophic Figure (26), the connected Neutrosophic 817
SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E), is Neutrosophic highlighted and Neutrosophic 818
featured. The obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, by the Neutrosophic Algorithm in 819
previous Neutrosophic result, of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the connected 820
Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E), in the Neutrosophic 821
SuperHyperModel (26), is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperK-Number. 822
Proposition 5.9. Assume a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite 823
Figure 26. Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite Neutrosophic Associated to the Neutro-

sophic Notions of Neutrosophic SuperHyperK-Number in the Example (16.11)
ESHM : (V, E). Then 824

= {EiEi ∈Pi ||Pi |=minPj ∈EN SHG |Pj | }.
Pj ∈EN SHG
...
= {ViVi ∈Pi ||Pi |=minPj ∈VN SHG |Pj | }.
Pj ∈EN SHG

Proof. Let 825
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
V|P i |=minP ∈E |Pj | , E|Pi |=minPj ∈EN SHG |Pj | .
j N SHG
826
P :
E1 , V1EXT ERN AL ,
E2 , V2EXT ERN AL ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
E|Pi |=minPj ∈EN SHG |Pj | , V|Pi |=minP ∈E |Pj |
j N SHG
SuperHyperMultipartite ESHM : (V, E). There’s a new way to redefine as 828

straightforward. Then there’s no at least one SuperHyperK-Number. Thus the notion of 831
quasi may be up but the SuperHyperNotions based on SuperHyperK-Number could be 832
applied. There are only z 0 SuperHyperParts. Thus every SuperHyperPart could have 833
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
is a longest path taken from a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite 835
ESHM : (V, E). Thus only some SuperHyperVertices and only 836
solution 838
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
ESHM : (V, E). The latter is straightforward. 840
Example 5.10. In the Figure (27), the connected Neutrosophic 841
SuperHyperMultipartite ESHM : (V, E), is highlighted and Neutrosophic featured. 842
The obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, by the Algorithm in previous Neutrosophic 843
result, of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the connected Neutrosophic 844
SuperHyperMultipartite ESHM : (V, E), in the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (27), 845
is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperK-Number. 846
Proposition 5.11. Assume a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel 847
Figure 27. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite Associated to the Notions of

Neutrosophic SuperHyperK-Number in the Example (16.13)
ESHW : (V, E). Then, 848
|E ∗ |
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperK-Number = {Ei∗ }i=1N SHG .
∗
= z |EN SHG | .
...
={CENTER}. 850
=z. 852
s
C(NSHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperK-Number SuperHyperPolynomial = z . 854
Proof. Let 855
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1∗ ,
CEN T ER, E2∗
856
P :
E1∗ , V1EXT ERN AL ,
E2∗ , CEN T ER
Figure 28. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel Neutrosophic Associated to the Neutro-

sophic Notions of Neutrosophic SuperHyperK-Number in the Neutrosophic Example
(16.15)
SuperHyperWheel ESHW : (V, E). There’s a new way to redefine as 858

straightforward. Then there’s at least one SuperHyperK-Number. Thus the notion of 861
quasi isn’t up and the SuperHyperNotions based on SuperHyperK-Number could be 862
applied. The unique embedded SuperHyperK-Number proposes some longest 863
SuperHyperK-Number excerpt from some representatives. The latter is 864
SuperHyperWheel N SHW : (V, E), is Neutrosophic highlighted and featured. The 867
obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, by the Algorithm in previous result, of the 868
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel 869
ESHW : (V, E), in the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (28), is the Neutrosophic 870
6 The Surveys of Mathematical Sets On The 872
Results But As The Initial Motivation 873
For the SuperHyperK-Number, Neutrosophic SuperHyperK-Number, and the 874
Neutrosophic SuperHyperK-Number, some general results are introduced. 875
Remark 6.1. Let remind that the Neutrosophic SuperHyperK-Number is “redefined” on 876
the positions of the alphabets. 877
Corollary 6.2. Assume Neutrosophic SuperHyperK-Number. Then 878
N eutrosophic SuperHyperK − N umber =

{theSuperHyperK − N umberof theSuperHyperV ertices |
max |SuperHyperOf f ensive
SuperHyperK − N umber
|N eutrosophiccardinalityamidthoseSuperHyperK−N umber. }
plus one Neutrosophic SuperHypeNeighbor to one. Where σi is the unary operation on 879
the SuperHyperVertices of the SuperHyperGraph to assign the determinacy, the 880
indeterminacy and the neutrality, for i = 1, 2, 3, respectively. 881
Corollary 6.3. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph on the same identical letter 882
of the alphabet. Then the notion of Neutrosophic SuperHyperK-Number and 883
SuperHyperK-Number coincide. 884
of the alphabet. Then a consecutive sequence of the SuperHyperVertices is a 886
Neutrosophic SuperHyperK-Number if and only if it’s a SuperHyperK-Number. 887
of the alphabet. Then a consecutive sequence of the SuperHyperVertices is a strongest 889
SuperHyperK-Number if and only if it’s a longest SuperHyperK-Number. 890
Corollary 6.6. Assume SuperHyperClasses of a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph on the 891
same identical letter of the alphabet. Then its Neutrosophic SuperHyperK-Number is its 892
SuperHyperK-Number and reversely. 893
Corollary 6.7. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath(-/SuperHyperK-Number, 894
SuperHyperStar, SuperHyperBipartite, SuperHyperMultipartite, SuperHyperWheel) on 895
the same identical letter of the alphabet. Then its Neutrosophic SuperHyperK-Number is 896
its SuperHyperK-Number and reversely. 897
Corollary 6.8. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. Then its Neutrosophic 898
SuperHyperK-Number isn’t well-defined if and only if its SuperHyperK-Number isn’t 899
well-defined. 900
Corollary 6.9. Assume SuperHyperClasses of a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. Then 901
its Neutrosophic SuperHyperK-Number isn’t well-defined if and only if its 902
SuperHyperK-Number isn’t well-defined. 903
Then its Neutrosophic SuperHyperK-Number isn’t well-defined if and only if its 906
SuperHyperK-Number isn’t well-defined. 907
Corollary 6.11. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. Then its Neutrosophic 908
SuperHyperK-Number is well-defined if and only if its SuperHyperK-Number is 909
well-defined. 910
Corollary 6.12. Assume SuperHyperClasses of a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. 911
Then its Neutrosophic SuperHyperK-Number is well-defined if and only if its 912
SuperHyperK-Number is well-defined. 913
Then its Neutrosophic SuperHyperK-Number is well-defined if and only if its 916
SuperHyperK-Number is well-defined. 917
Proposition 6.14. Let ESHG : (V, E) be a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. Then V 918
is 919
(i) : the dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperK-Number; 920
(ii) : the strong dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperK-Number; 921
(iii) : the connected dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperK-Number; 922
(iv) : the δ-dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperK-Number; 923
(v) : the strong δ-dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperK-Number; 924
(vi) : the connected δ-dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperK-Number. 925
Proposition 6.15. Let N T G : (V, E, σ, µ) be a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. Then 926
∅ is 927
(i) : the SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperK-Number; 928
(ii) : the strong SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperK-Number; 929
(iii) : the connected defensive SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperK-Number; 930
(iv) : the δ-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperK-Number; 931
(v) : the strong δ-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperK-Number; 932
(vi) : the connected δ-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperK-Number. 933
Proposition 6.16. Let ESHG : (V, E) be a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. Then an 934
independent SuperHyperSet is 935
(i) : the SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperK-Number; 936
(ii) : the strong SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperK-Number; 937
(iii) : the connected SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperK-Number; 938
(iv) : the δ-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperK-Number; 939
(v) : the strong δ-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperK-Number; 940
(vi) : the connected δ-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperK-Number. 941
Proposition 6.17. Let ESHG : (V, E) be a Neutrosophic SuperHyperUniform 942
SuperHyperGraph which is a SuperHyperK-Number/SuperHyperPath. Then V is a 943
maximal 944
(i) : SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperK-Number; 945
(ii) : strong SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperK-Number; 946
(iii) : connected SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperK-Number; 947
(iv) : O(ESHG)-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperK-Number; 948
(v) : strong O(ESHG)-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperK-Number; 949
(vi) : connected O(ESHG)-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperK-Number; 950
Where the exterior SuperHyperVertices and the interior SuperHyperVertices coincide. 951
Proposition 6.18. Let ESHG : (V, E) be a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph which is a 952
SuperHyperUniform SuperHyperWheel. Then V is a maximal 953
(i) : dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperK-Number; 954
(ii) : strong dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperK-Number; 955
(iii) : connected dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperK-Number; 956
(iv) : O(ESHG)-dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperK-Number; 957
(v) : strong O(ESHG)-dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperK-Number; 958
(vi) : connected O(ESHG)-dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperK-Number; 959
Where the exterior SuperHyperVertices and the interior SuperHyperVertices coincide. 960
SuperHyperGraph which is a SuperHyperK-Number/SuperHyperPath. Then the number 962
of 963
(i) : the SuperHyperK-Number; 964
(ii) : the SuperHyperK-Number; 965
(iii) : the connected SuperHyperK-Number; 966
(iv) : the O(ESHG)-SuperHyperK-Number; 967
(v) : the strong O(ESHG)-SuperHyperK-Number; 968
(vi) : the connected O(ESHG)-SuperHyperK-Number. 969
is one and it’s only V. Where the exterior SuperHyperVertices and the interior 970
SuperHyperVertices coincide. 971
SuperHyperGraph which is a SuperHyperWheel. Then the number of 973
(i) : the dual SuperHyperK-Number; 974
(ii) : the dual SuperHyperK-Number; 975
(iii) : the dual connected SuperHyperK-Number; 976
(iv) : the dual O(ESHG)-SuperHyperK-Number; 977
(v) : the strong dual O(ESHG)-SuperHyperK-Number; 978
(vi) : the connected dual O(ESHG)-SuperHyperK-Number. 979
is one and it’s only V. Where the exterior SuperHyperVertices and the interior 980
SuperHyperGraph which is a SuperHyperStar/SuperHyperComplete 983
SuperHyperBipartite/SuperHyperComplete SuperHyperMultipartite. Then a 984
SuperHyperSet contains [the SuperHyperCenter and] the half of multiplying r with the 985
number of all the SuperHyperEdges plus one of all the SuperHyperVertices is a 986
O(ESHG)
(iv) : 2 + 1-dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperK-Number; 990
O(ESHG)
(v) : strong 2 + 1-dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperK-Number; 991
O(ESHG)
(vi) : connected 2 + 1-dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperK-Number. 992
SuperHyperBipartite/SuperHyperComplete SuperHyperMultipartite. Then a 995
SuperHyperSet contains the half of multiplying r with the number of all the 996
SuperHyperEdges plus one of all the SuperHyperVertices in the biggest SuperHyperPart 997
is a 998
(iv) : δ-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperK-Number; 1002
(v) : strong δ-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperK-Number; 1003
(vi) : connected δ-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperK-Number. 1004
SuperHyperBipartite/SuperHyperComplete SuperHyperMultipartite. Then Then the 1007
number of 1008
O(ESHG)
(iv) : 2 + 1-dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperK-Number; 1012
O(ESHG)
(v) : strong 2 + 1-dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperK-Number; 1013
O(ESHG)
(vi) : connected 2 + 1-dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperK-Number. 1014
is one and it’s only S, a SuperHyperSet contains [the SuperHyperCenter and] the half of 1015
multiplying r with the number of all the SuperHyperEdges plus one of all the 1016
SuperHyperVertices. Where the exterior SuperHyperVertices and the interior 1017
Proposition 6.24. Let ESHG : (V, E) be a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. The 1019
number of connected component is |V − S| if there’s a SuperHyperSet which is a dual 1020
(iv) : SuperHyperK-Number; 1024
(v) : strong 1-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperK-Number; 1025
(vi) : connected 1-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperK-Number. 1026
Proposition 6.25. Let ESHG : (V, E) be a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. Then the 1027
number is at most O(ESHG) and the Neutrosophic number is at most On (ESHG). 1028
Proposition 6.26. Let ESHG : (V, E) be a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph which is 1029
SuperHyperComplete. The number is O(ESHG:(V,E)) 2 + 1 and the Neutrosophic number is 1030
min Σv∈{v1 ,v2 ,··· ,vt } O(ESHG:(V,E)) ⊆V σ(v), in the setting of dual 1031
t>
2
(iv) : ( O(ESHG:(V,E))
2 + 1)-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperK-Number; 1035
(v) : strong ( O(ESHG:(V,E))

(vi) : connected ( O(ESHG:(V,E))

2 + 1)-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperK-Number. 1037
∅. The number is 0 and the Neutrosophic number is 0, for an independent 1039
SuperHyperSet in the setting of dual 1040
(iv) : 0-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperK-Number; 1044
(v) : strong 0-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperK-Number; 1045
(vi) : connected 0-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperK-Number. 1046
SuperHyperComplete. Then there’s no independent SuperHyperSet. 1048
SuperHyperK-Number/SuperHyperPath/SuperHyperWheel. The number is 1050
O(ESHG : (V, E)) and the Neutrosophic number is On (ESHG : (V, E)), in the setting 1051
of a dual 1052
(iv) : O(ESHG : (V, E))-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperK-Number; 1056
(v) : strong O(ESHG : (V, E))-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperK-Number; 1057
(vi) : connected O(ESHG : (V, E))-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperK-Number. 1058
SuperHyperStar/complete SuperHyperBipartite/complete SuperHyperMultiPartite. The 1060
number is O(ESHG:(V,E))
2 + 1 and the Neutrosophic number is 1061
min Σv∈{v1 ,v2 ,··· ,vt } O(ESHG:(V,E)) ⊆V σ(v), in the setting of a dual 1062
t>
2
(iv) : ( O(ESHG:(V,E))
(v) : strong ( O(ESHG:(V,E))

(vi) : connected ( O(ESHG:(V,E))

2 + 1)-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperK-Number. 1068
Proposition 6.31. Let N SHF : (V, E) be a SuperHyperFamily of the ESHGs : (V, E) 1069
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs which are from one-type SuperHyperClass which the 1070
result is obtained for the individuals. Then the results also hold for the 1071
SuperHyperFamily N SHF : (V, E) of these specific SuperHyperClasses of the 1072
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs. 1073
Proposition 6.32. Let ESHG : (V, E) be a strong Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. If 1074
S is a dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperK-Number, then ∀v ∈ V \ S, ∃x ∈ S such 1075
that 1076
(i) v ∈ Ns (x); 1077
(ii) vx ∈ E. 1078
Proposition 6.33. Let ESHG : (V, E) be a strong Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. If 1079
S is a dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperK-Number, then 1080
(i) S is SuperHyperK-Number set; 1081
(ii) there’s S ⊆ S 0 such that |S 0 | is SuperHyperChromatic number. 1082
Proposition 6.34. Let ESHG : (V, E) be a strong Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. 1083
Then 1084
(i) Γ ≤ O; 1085
(ii) Γs ≤ On . 1086
Proposition 6.35. Let ESHG : (V, E) be a strong Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 1087
which is connected. Then 1088
(i) Γ ≤ O − 1; 1089
(ii) Γs ≤ On − Σ3i=1 σi (x). 1090
Proposition 6.36. Let ESHG : (V, E) be an odd SuperHyperPath. Then 1091
(i) the SuperHyperSet S = {v2 , v4 , · · · , vn−1 } is a dual SuperHyperDefensive 1092
SuperHyperK-Number; 1093
(ii) Γ = b n2 c + 1 and corresponded SuperHyperSet is S = {v2 , v4 , · · · , vn−1 }; 1094
(iii) Γs = min{Σs∈S={v2 ,v4 ,··· ,vn−1 } Σ3i=1 σi (s), Σs∈S={v1 ,v3 ,··· ,vn−1 } Σ3i=1 σi (s)}; 1095
(iv) the SuperHyperSets S1 = {v2 , v4 , · · · , vn−1 } and S2 = {v1 , v3 , · · · , vn−1 } are only 1096
a dual SuperHyperK-Number. 1097
Proposition 6.37. Let ESHG : (V, E) be an even SuperHyperPath. Then 1098
(i) the set S = {v2 , v4 , · · · .vn } is a dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperK-Number; 1099
(ii) Γ = b n2 c and corresponded SuperHyperSets are {v2 , v4 , · · · .vn } and 1100
{v1 , v3 , · · · .vn−1 }; 1101
(iii) Γs = min{Σs∈S={v2 ,v4 ,··· ,vn } Σ3i=1 σi (s), Σs∈S={v1 ,v3 ,··· .vn−1 } Σ3i=1 σi (s)}; 1102
(iv) the SuperHyperSets S1 = {v2 , v4 , · · · .vn } and S2 = {v1 , v3 , · · · .vn−1 } are only 1103
dual SuperHyperK-Number. 1104
Proposition 6.38. Let ESHG : (V, E) be an even SuperHyperK-Number. Then 1105
(i) the SuperHyperSet S = {v2 , v4 , · · · , vn } is a dual SuperHyperDefensive 1106
(ii) Γ = b n2 c and corresponded SuperHyperSets are {v2 , v4 , · · · , vn } and 1108
{v1 , v3 , · · · , vn−1 }; 1109
(iii) Γs = min{Σs∈S={v2 ,v4 ,··· ,vn } σ(s), Σs∈S={v1 ,v3 ,··· ,vn−1 } σ(s)}; 1110
(iv) the SuperHyperSets S1 = {v2 , v4 , · · · , vn } and S2 = {v1 , v3 , · · · , vn−1 } are only 1111
Proposition 6.39. Let ESHG : (V, E) be an odd SuperHyperK-Number. Then 1113
(i) the SuperHyperSet S = {v2 , v4 , · · · , vn−1 } is a dual SuperHyperDefensive 1114
(ii) Γ = b n2 c + 1 and corresponded SuperHyperSet is S = {v2 , v4 , · · · , vn−1 }; 1116
(iii) Γs = min{Σs∈S={v2 ,v4 ,··· .vn−1 } Σ3i=1 σi (s), Σs∈S={v1 ,v3 ,··· .vn−1 } Σ3i=1 σi (s)}; 1117
(iv) the SuperHyperSets S1 = {v2 , v4 , · · · .vn−1 } and S2 = {v1 , v3 , · · · .vn−1 } are only 1118
Proposition 6.40. Let ESHG : (V, E) be SuperHyperStar. Then 1120
(i) the SuperHyperSet S = {c} is a dual maximal SuperHyperK-Number; 1121
(ii) Γ = 1; 1122
(iii) Γs = Σ3i=1 σi (c); 1123
(iv) the SuperHyperSets S = {c} and S ⊂ S 0 are only dual SuperHyperK-Number. 1124
Proposition 6.41. Let ESHG : (V, E) be SuperHyperWheel. Then 1125
6+3(i−1)≤n
(i) the SuperHyperSet S = {v1 , v3 } ∪ {v6 , v9 · · · , vi+6 , · · · , vn }i=1 is a dual 1126
maximal SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperK-Number; 1127
6+3(i−1)≤n
(ii) Γ = |{v1 , v3 } ∪ {v6 , v9 · · · , vi+6 , · · · , vn }i=1 |; 1128
(iii) Γs = Σ{v1 ,v3 }∪{v6 ,v9 ··· ,vi+6 ,··· ,vn }6+3(i−1)≤n Σ3i=1 σi (s); 1129
i=1
6+3(i−1)≤n
(iv) the SuperHyperSet {v1 , v3 } ∪ {v6 , v9 · · · , vi+6 , · · · , vn }i=1 is only a dual 1130
maximal SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperK-Number. 1131
Proposition 6.42. Let ESHG : (V, E) be an odd SuperHyperComplete. Then 1132
b n c+1
(i) the SuperHyperSet S = {vi }i=1
2
is a dual SuperHyperDefensive 1133
(ii) Γ = b n2 c + 1; 1135
(iii) Γs = min{Σs∈S Σ3i=1 σi (s)} b n c+1

2
; 1136
S={vi }i=1
b n c+1
(iv) the SuperHyperSet S = {vi }i=1
2
is only a dual SuperHyperDefensive 1137
Proposition 6.43. Let ESHG : (V, E) be an even SuperHyperComplete. Then 1139
bn
2c
(i) the SuperHyperSet S = {vi }i=1 is a dual SuperHyperDefensive 1140
(ii) Γ = b n2 c; 1142
(iii) Γs = min{Σs∈S Σ3i=1 σi (s)} bnc

2
; 1143
S={vi }i=1
bnc
(iv) the SuperHyperSet S = {vi }i=1
2
is only a dual maximal SuperHyperDefensive 1144
Proposition 6.44. Let N SHF : (V, E) be a m-SuperHyperFamily of Neutrosophic 1146
SuperHyperStars with common Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex SuperHyperSet. Then 1147
(i) the SuperHyperSet S = {c1 , c2 , · · · , cm } is a dual SuperHyperDefensive 1148
SuperHyperK-Number for N SHF; 1149
(ii) Γ = m for N SHF : (V, E); 1150
(iii) Γs = Σm 3
i=1 Σj=1 σj (ci ) for N SHF : (V, E); 1151
(iv) the SuperHyperSets S = {c1 , c2 , · · · , cm } and S ⊂ S 0 are only dual 1152
SuperHyperK-Number for N SHF : (V, E). 1153
Proposition 6.45. Let N SHF : (V, E) be an m-SuperHyperFamily of odd 1154
SuperHyperComplete SuperHyperGraphs with common Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex 1155
SuperHyperSet. Then 1156
b n c+1
(i) the SuperHyperSet S = {vi }i=1
2
is a dual maximal SuperHyperDefensive 1157
SuperHyperK-Number for N SHF; 1158
(ii) Γ = b n2 c + 1 for N SHF : (V, E); 1159
(iii) Γs = min{Σs∈S Σ3i=1 σi (s)} b n c+1

2
for N SHF : (V, E); 1160
S={vi }i=1
b n c+1
(iv) the SuperHyperSets S = {vi }i=1
2
are only a dual maximal SuperHyperK-Number 1161
for N SHF : (V, E). 1162
Proposition 6.46. Let N SHF : (V, E) be a m-SuperHyperFamily of even 1163
SuperHyperComplete SuperHyperGraphs with common Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex 1164
SuperHyperSet. Then 1165
bn
2c
(i) the SuperHyperSet S = {vi }i=1 is a dual SuperHyperDefensive 1166
SuperHyperK-Number for N SHF : (V, E); 1167
(ii) Γ = b n2 c for N SHF : (V, E); 1168
(iii) Γs = min{Σs∈S Σ3i=1 σi (s)} 2

bnc for N SHF : (V, E); 1169
S={vi }i=1
bnc
(iv) the SuperHyperSets S = {vi }i=1
2
are only dual maximal SuperHyperK-Number for 1170
N SHF : (V, E). 1171
Then following statements hold; 1173
(i) if s ≥ t and a SuperHyperSet S of SuperHyperVertices is an 1174
t-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperK-Number, then S is an s-SuperHyperDefensive 1175
(ii) if s ≤ t and a SuperHyperSet S of SuperHyperVertices is a dual 1177
t-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperK-Number, then S is a dual 1178
s-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperK-Number. 1179
Then following statements hold; 1181
(i) if s ≥ t + 2 and a SuperHyperSet S of SuperHyperVertices is an 1182
t-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperK-Number, then S is an s-SuperHyperPowerful 1183
(ii) if s ≤ t and a SuperHyperSet S of SuperHyperVertices is a dual 1185
t-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperK-Number, then S is a dual 1186
s-SuperHyperPowerful SuperHyperK-Number. 1187
Proposition 6.49. Let ESHG : (V, E) be a[an] 1188
[V-]SuperHyperUniform-strong-Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. Then following 1189
statements hold; 1190
(i) if ∀a ∈ S, |Ns (a) ∩ S| < b 2r c + 1, then ESHG : (V, E) is an 1191
2-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperK-Number; 1192
(ii) if ∀a ∈ V \ S, |Ns (a) ∩ S| > b 2r c + 1, then ESHG : (V, E) is a dual 1193
(iii) if ∀a ∈ S, |Ns (a) ∩ V \ S| = 0, then ESHG : (V, E) is an V-SuperHyperDefensive 1195
(iv) if ∀a ∈ V \ S, |Ns (a) ∩ V \ S| = 0, then ESHG : (V, E) is a dual 1197
V-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperK-Number. 1198
Proposition 6.50. Let ESHG : (V, E) is a[an] 1199
[V-]SuperHyperUniform-strong-Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. Then following 1200
statements hold; 1201
(i) ∀a ∈ S, |Ns (a) ∩ S| < b 2r c + 1 if ESHG : (V, E) is an 2-SuperHyperDefensive 1202
(ii) ∀a ∈ V \ S, |Ns (a) ∩ S| > b 2r c + 1 if ESHG : (V, E) is a dual 1204
(iii) ∀a ∈ S, |Ns (a) ∩ V \ S| = 0 if ESHG : (V, E) is an V-SuperHyperDefensive 1206
(iv) ∀a ∈ V \ S, |Ns (a) ∩ V \ S| = 0 if ESHG : (V, E) is a dual 1208
V-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperK-Number. 1209
[V-]SuperHyperUniform-strong-Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph which is a 1211
SuperHyperComplete. Then following statements hold; 1212
(i) ∀a ∈ S, |Ns (a) ∩ S| < b O−1

2 c + 1 if ESHG : (V, E) is an 2-SuperHyperDefensive 1213
(ii) ∀a ∈ V \ S, |Ns (a) ∩ S| > b O−1

2 c + 1 if ESHG : (V, E) is a dual 1215
(iii) ∀a ∈ S, |Ns (a) ∩ V \ S| = 0 if ESHG : (V, E) is an (O − 1)-SuperHyperDefensive 1217
(O − 1)-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperK-Number. 1220
[V-]SuperHyperUniform-strong-Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph which is a 1222
SuperHyperComplete. Then following statements hold; 1223
(i) if ∀a ∈ S, |Ns (a) ∩ S| < b O−1

2 c + 1, then ESHG : (V, E) is an 1224
(ii) if ∀a ∈ V \ S, |Ns (a) ∩ S| > b O−1

2 c + 1, then ESHG : (V, E) is a dual 1226
(iii) if ∀a ∈ S, |Ns (a) ∩ V \ S| = 0, then ESHG : (V, E) is 1228
(O − 1)-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperK-Number; 1229
(O − 1)-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperK-Number. 1231
[V-]SuperHyperUniform-strong-Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph which is 1233
SuperHyperK-Number. Then following statements hold; 1234
(i) ∀a ∈ S, |Ns (a) ∩ S| < 2 if ESHG : (V, E)) is an 2-SuperHyperDefensive 1235
(ii) ∀a ∈ V \ S, |Ns (a) ∩ S| > 2 if ESHG : (V, E) is a dual 2-SuperHyperDefensive 1237
(iii) ∀a ∈ S, |Ns (a) ∩ V \ S| = 0 if ESHG : (V, E) is an 2-SuperHyperDefensive 1239
2-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperK-Number. 1242
[V-]SuperHyperUniform-strong-Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph which is 1244
SuperHyperK-Number. Then following statements hold; 1245
(i) if ∀a ∈ S, |Ns (a) ∩ S| < 2, then ESHG : (V, E) is an 2-SuperHyperDefensive 1246
(ii) if ∀a ∈ V \ S, |Ns (a) ∩ S| > 2, then ESHG : (V, E) is a dual 1248
(iii) if ∀a ∈ S, |Ns (a) ∩ V \ S| = 0, then ESHG : (V, E) is an 2-SuperHyperDefensive 1250
2-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperK-Number. 1253
7 Neutrosophic Applications in Cancer’s 1254
Neutrosophic Recognition 1255
The cancer is the Neutrosophic disease but the Neutrosophic model is going to figure 1256
out what’s going on this Neutrosophic phenomenon. The special Neutrosophic case of 1257
this Neutrosophic disease is considered and as the consequences of the model, some 1258
parameters are used. The cells are under attack of this disease but the moves of the 1259
cancer in the special region are the matter of mind. The Neutrosophic recognition of the 1260
cancer could help to find some Neutrosophic treatments for this Neutrosophic disease. 1261
In the following, some Neutrosophic steps are Neutrosophic devised on this disease. 1262
Step 1. (Neutrosophic Definition) The Neutrosophic recognition of the cancer in 1263
the long-term Neutrosophic function. 1264
Step 2. (Neutrosophic Issue) The specific region has been assigned by the 1265
Neutrosophic model [it’s called Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph] and the long 1266
Neutrosophic cycle of the move from the cancer is identified by this research. 1267
Sometimes the move of the cancer hasn’t be easily identified since there are some 1268
determinacy, indeterminacy and neutrality about the moves and the effects of the 1269
cancer on that region; this event leads us to choose another model [it’s said to be 1270
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph] to have convenient perception on what’s 1271
happened and what’s done. 1272
Step 3. (Neutrosophic Model) There are some specific Neutrosophic models, 1273
which are well-known and they’ve got the names, and some general Neutrosophic 1274
models. The moves and the Neutrosophic traces of the cancer on the complex 1275
tracks and between complicated groups of cells could be fantasized by a 1276
Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath(-/SuperHyperK-Number, SuperHyperStar, 1277
SuperHyperBipartite, SuperHyperMultipartite, SuperHyperWheel). The aim is to 1278
find either the Neutrosophic SuperHyperK-Number or the Neutrosophic 1279
SuperHyperK-Number in those Neutrosophic Neutrosophic SuperHyperModels. 1280
8 Case 1: The Initial Neutrosophic Steps 1281
Toward Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite as 1282
Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel 1283
Step 4. (Neutrosophic Solution) In the Neutrosophic Figure (29), the 1284
Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite is Neutrosophic highlighted and Neutrosophic 1285
featured. 1286
By using the Neutrosophic Figure (29) and the Table (4), the Neutrosophic 1287
SuperHyperBipartite is obtained. 1288
The obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, by the Neutrosophic Algorithm in 1289
previous Neutrosophic result, of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the 1290
connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E), in the 1291
Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (29), is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperK-Number. 1292
Figure 29. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite Associated to the Notions of Neutro-

sophic SuperHyperK-Number
Table 4. The Values of Vertices, SuperVertices, Edges, HyperEdges, and SuperHyper-

Edges Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite
Figure 30. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite Associated to the Notions of

Neutrosophic SuperHyperK-Number
Table 5. The Values of Vertices, SuperVertices, Edges, HyperEdges, and SuperHyper-

Edges Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite
9 Case 2: The Increasing Neutrosophic Steps 1293
Toward Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite as 1294
Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel 1295
Step 4. (Neutrosophic Solution) In the Neutrosophic Figure (30), the 1296
Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite is Neutrosophic highlighted and 1297
Neutrosophic featured. 1298
By using the Neutrosophic Figure (30) and the Table (5), the Neutrosophic 1299
SuperHyperMultipartite is obtained. 1300
The obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, by the Neutrosophic Algorithm in 1301
previous result, of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the connected 1302
Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite ESHM : (V, E), in the Neutrosophic 1303
SuperHyperModel (30), is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperK-Number. 1304
10 Wondering Open Problems But As The 1305
Directions To Forming The Motivations 1306
In what follows, some “problems” and some “questions” are proposed. 1307
The SuperHyperK-Number and the Neutrosophic SuperHyperK-Number are defined 1308
on a real-world application, titled “Cancer’s Recognitions”. 1309
Question 10.1. Which the else SuperHyperModels could be defined based on Cancer’s 1310
recognitions? 1311
Question 10.2. Are there some SuperHyperNotions related to SuperHyperK-Number 1312
and the Neutrosophic SuperHyperK-Number? 1313
Question 10.3. Are there some Algorithms to be defined on the SuperHyperModels to 1314
compute them? 1315
Question 10.4. Which the SuperHyperNotions are related to beyond the 1316
SuperHyperK-Number and the Neutrosophic SuperHyperK-Number? 1317
Problem 10.5. The SuperHyperK-Number and the Neutrosophic SuperHyperK-Number 1318
do a SuperHyperModel for the Cancer’s recognitions and they’re based on 1319
SuperHyperK-Number, are there else? 1320
Problem 10.6. Which the fundamental SuperHyperNumbers are related to these 1321
SuperHyperNumbers types-results? 1322
Problem 10.7. What’s the independent research based on Cancer’s recognitions 1323
concerning the multiple types of SuperHyperNotions? 1324
11 Conclusion and Closing Remarks 1325
In this section, concluding remarks and closing remarks are represented. The drawbacks 1326
of this research are illustrated. Some benefits and some advantages of this research are 1327
highlighted. 1328
This research uses some approaches to make Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs more 1329
understandable. In this endeavor, two SuperHyperNotions are defined on the 1330
SuperHyperK-Number. For that sake in the second definition, the main definition of the 1331
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph is redefined on the position of the alphabets. Based on 1332
the new definition for the Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph, the new SuperHyperNotion, 1333
Neutrosophic SuperHyperK-Number, finds the convenient background to implement 1334
some results based on that. Some SuperHyperClasses and some Neutrosophic 1335
SuperHyperClasses are the cases of this research on the modeling of the regions where 1336
are under the attacks of the cancer to recognize this disease as it’s mentioned on the 1337
title “Cancer’s Recognitions”. To formalize the instances on the SuperHyperNotion, 1338
SuperHyperK-Number, the new SuperHyperClasses and SuperHyperClasses, are 1339
introduced. Some general results are gathered in the section on the 1340
SuperHyperK-Number and the Neutrosophic SuperHyperK-Number. The clarifications, 1341
instances and literature reviews have taken the whole way through. In this research, the 1342
literature reviews have fulfilled the lines containing the notions and the results. The 1343
SuperHyperGraph and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph are the SuperHyperModels on 1344
the “Cancer’s Recognitions” and both bases are the background of this research. 1345
Sometimes the cancer has been happened on the region, full of cells, groups of cells and 1346
embedded styles. In this segment, the SuperHyperModel proposes some 1347
SuperHyperNotions based on the connectivities of the moves of the cancer in the longest 1348
and strongest styles with the formation of the design and the architecture are formally 1349
called “ SuperHyperK-Number” in the themes of jargons and buzzwords. The prefix 1350
“SuperHyper” refers to the theme of the embedded styles to figure out the background 1351
for the SuperHyperNotions. In the Table (6), benefits and avenues for this research are, 1352
figured out, pointed out and spoken out. 1353
Table 6. An Overlook On This Research And Beyond

Advantages Limitations
1. Redefining Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 1. General Results
2. SuperHyperK-Number
3. Neutrosophic SuperHyperK-Number 2. Other SuperHyperNumbers
4. Modeling of Cancer’s Recognitions
5. SuperHyperClasses 3. SuperHyperFamilies
12 Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality But As The 1354
Extensions Excerpt From Dense And Super 1355
Forms 1356
Definition 12.1. (Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality). 1357
(i) Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperDuality if ∀Ei ∈ E 0 , ∃Ej ∈ EESHG:(V,E) \ E 0 1361
such that Va ∈ Ei , Ej ; 1362
(ii) Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperDuality if ∀Ei ∈ E 0 , ∃Ej ∈ EESHG:(V,E) \ E 0 1363
such that Va ∈ Ei , Ej and 1364
(iii) Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperDuality if ∀Vi ∈ V 0 , ∃Vj ∈ VESHG:(V,E) \ V 0 1366
such that Vi , Vj ∈ Ea ; 1367
(iv) Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperDuality if ∀Vi ∈ V 0 , ∃Vj ∈ VESHG:(V,E) \ V 0 1368
such that Vi , Vj ∈ Ea and 1369
(v) Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality if it’s either of Neutrosophic 1371
e-SuperHyperDuality, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperDuality, Neutrosophic 1372
v-SuperHyperDuality, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperDuality. 1373
Definition 12.2. ((Neutrosophic) SuperHyperDuality). 1374
(i) an Extreme SuperHyperDuality if it’s either of Neutrosophic 1378
v-SuperHyperDuality, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperDuality and C(N SHG) for 1380
an Extreme SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the maximum Extreme 1381
cardinality of an Extreme SuperHyperSet S of high Extreme cardinality of the 1382
Extreme SuperHyperEdges in the consecutive Extreme sequence of Extreme 1383
Extreme SuperHyperDuality; 1385
(ii) a Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality if it’s either of Neutrosophic 1386
a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the maximum Neutrosophic 1389
cardinality of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges of a Neutrosophic 1390
Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality; 1393
(iii) an Extreme SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either of 1394
Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperDuality, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperDuality, 1395
Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperDuality, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperDuality and 1396
C(N SHG) for an Extreme SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the Extreme 1397
SuperHyperPolynomial contains the Extreme coefficients defined as the Extreme 1398
number of the maximum Extreme cardinality of the Extreme SuperHyperEdges of 1399
an Extreme SuperHyperSet S of high Extreme cardinality consecutive Extreme 1400
Extreme SuperHyperDuality; and the Extreme power is corresponded to its 1402
(iv) a Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either 1404
of Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperDuality, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperDuality, 1405
C(N SHG) for a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the 1407
Neutrosophic SuperHyperPolynomial contains the Neutrosophic coefficients 1408
defined as the Neutrosophic number of the maximum Neutrosophic cardinality of 1409
the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges of a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of high 1410
Neutrosophic cardinality consecutive Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges and 1411
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that they form the Neutrosophic 1412
SuperHyperDuality; and the Neutrosophic power is corresponded to its 1413
Neutrosophic coefficient; 1414
(v) an Extreme R-SuperHyperDuality if it’s either of Neutrosophic 1415
Extreme SuperHyperVertices in the consecutive Extreme sequence of Extreme 1420
Extreme SuperHyperDuality; 1422
(vi) a Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperDuality if it’s either of Neutrosophic 1423
cardinality of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of a Neutrosophic 1427
Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality; 1430
(vii) an Extreme R-SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either 1431
number of the maximum Extreme cardinality of the Extreme SuperHyperVertices 1436
of an Extreme SuperHyperSet S of high Extreme cardinality consecutive Extreme 1437
Extreme SuperHyperDuality; and the Extreme power is corresponded to its 1439
(viii) a Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either 1441
the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of high 1447
SuperHyperDuality; and the Neutrosophic power is corresponded to its 1450
Neutrosophic coefficient. 1451
SuperHyperDuality, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly 1456
straightforward. E1 and E3 are some empty Extreme SuperHyperEdges but E2 is 1457
a loop Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge and E4 is a Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge. 1458
Thus in the terms of Neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighbor, there’s only one 1459
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge, namely, E4 . The Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, 1460
V3 is Neutrosophic isolated means that there’s no Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge 1461
has it as a Neutrosophic endpoint. Thus the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, V3 , 1462
is excluded in every given Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality. 1463
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality = {E4 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperDuality = {V4 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial = 3z.
SuperHyperDuality. 1472


C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality = {E4 , E2 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial = 2z 2 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperDuality = {V1 , V4 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial = 15z 2 .

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial = 4z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality = {E3i+13i=0 , E3i+243i=0 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial 6z 8 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperDuality = {V3i+17i=0 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality = {E15 , E16 , E17 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial = z 3 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperDuality = {V3 , V13 , V8 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial =
4 × 5 × 5z 3 .

4 × 5 × 5z 3 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality = {E3i+13i=0 , E23 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperDuality = {V3i+13i=0 , V15 }.

4 × 5 × 5z 3 .

3 × 3z 2 .

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperDuality = {V1 , Vii610=5,7,8 }.
i=4

3 × 3z 2 .



(2 × 1 × 2) + (2 × 4 × 5)z.

(1 × 1 × 2)z.

(2 × 2 × 2)z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality = {E3i+1i=03 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperDuality = {V2i+1i=05 }.



C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial
= 10 × 9 + 10 × 6 + 12 × 9 + 12 × 6z 2 .
Proposition 12.4. Assume a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath 1535
ESHP : (V, E). Then 1536
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality =

|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality
= {Ei }i=1 3
.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial
= 3z 3 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperDuality
= {ViEXT ERN AL }i=1 3

.
Y |EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality
= |V EXT ERN AL ESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality z 3 .
Proof. Let 1537
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
E |EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality , V EXT ERN AL |EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality .
3 3

corresponded to ViEXT ERN AL in the literatures of SuperHyperDuality. The latter is 1541
Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (23), is the SuperHyperDuality. 1545
Proposition 12.6. Assume a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle 1546
ESHC : (V, E). Then 1547
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality =

= {Ei }i=1 3
.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial
= 3z 3 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperDuality

.
Proof. Let 1548
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
3 3

Then 1559
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperDuality = {E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial
= |i | Ei ∈ EESHG:(V,E)|Neutrosophic Cardinality |z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperDuality = {CEN T ER ∈ VESHG:(V,E) }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
Proof. Let 1560
P : ViEXT ERN AL , Ei , CEN T ER, VjEXT ERN AL .

the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (25), is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality. 1570
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperDuality

= {Ei ∈ EPi ESHG:(V,E) , |Pi ESHG:(V,E) | = min |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈ P ESHG:(V,E) |}.
i
X
=( (min |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈ P ESHG:(V,E) |)choose|Pi ESHG:(V,E) |)
i
i=|P ESHG:(V,E) |
ESHG:(V,E)
∈P ESHG:(V,E) |
z min |Pi
= {ViEXT ERN AL ∈ VPEXT
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , Vi
EXT ERN AL
∈ VPEXT
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , i 6= j}.

X X
= =( (|Pi ESHG:(V,E) |choose 2) = z 2 .
EXT ERN AL |
|VESHG:(V,E) i=|P ESHG:(V,E) |
Neutrosophic Cardinality
Proof. Let 1573
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
Emini |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) | , Vmin i |Pi
ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) |+1

straightforward. Then there’s at least one SuperHyperDuality. Thus the notion of quasi 1578
isn’t up and the SuperHyperNotions based on SuperHyperDuality could be applied. 1579
There are only two SuperHyperParts. Thus every SuperHyperPart could have one 1580
SuperHyperVertex as the representative in the 1581
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
is a longest SuperHyperDuality taken from a connected Neutrosophic 1582
solution 1585
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
SuperHyperModel (26), is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality. 1592

= {Ei ∈ EPi ESHG:(V,E) , |Pi ESHG:(V,E) | = min |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈ P ESHG:(V,E) |}.
i
X
i
i=|P ESHG:(V,E) |
ESHG:(V,E)
∈P ESHG:(V,E) |
z min |Pi
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , Vi
EXT ERN AL
∈ VPEXT
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , i 6= j}.

X X
EXT ERN AL |
Proof. Let 1595
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
is a longest SuperHyperDuality taken from a connected Neutrosophic 1596

There are only z 0 SuperHyperParts. Thus every SuperHyperPart could have one 1602
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
solution 1607
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality. 1615
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperDuality = {E ∗ ∈ EESHG:(V,E)

∗
}.
= |i | Ei∗ ∈ EESHG:(V,E)|
∗
|z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperDuality = {CEN T ER ∈ VESHG:(V,E) }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
Proof. Let 1618
P :
...,
∗ EXT ERN AL
E|E ∗ | , V|E ∗ |Neutrosophic Cardinality +1
ESHG:(V,E) Neutrosophic Cardinality ESHG:(V,E)
is a longest SuperHyperDuality taken from a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel 1619
ESHW : (V, E). There’s a new way to redefine as 1620

∃!Ez∗ ∈ EESHG:(V,E)
∗
, ViEXT ERN AL , VjEXT ERN AL ∈ Ez∗ ≡
∃!Ez∗ ∈ EESHG:(V,E)
∗
, {ViEXT ERN AL , VjEXT ERN AL } ⊆ Ez∗ .
The unique embedded SuperHyperDuality proposes some longest SuperHyperDuality 1625
excerpt from some representatives. The latter is straightforward. 1626
13 Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin But As The 1633
Forms 1635
Definition 13.1. (Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin). 1636
(i) Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperJoin if ∀Ei ∈ EESHG:(V,E) \ E 0 , ∃Ej ∈ E 0 , such 1640
that Va ∈ Ei , Ej ; and ∀Ei , Ej ∈ E 0 , such that Va 6∈ Ei , Ej ; 1641
(ii) Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperJoin if ∀Ei ∈ EESHG:(V,E) \ E 0 , ∃Ej ∈ E 0 , 1642
such that Va ∈ Ei , Ej ; ∀Ei , Ej ∈ E 0 , such that Va 6∈ Ei , Ej ; and 1643
(iii) Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperJoin if ∀Vi ∈ EESHG:(V,E) \ V 0 , ∃Vj ∈ V 0 , such 1645
that Vi , Vj 6∈ Ea ; and ∀Vi , Vj ∈ V 0 , such that Vi , Vj 6∈ Ea ; 1646
(iv) Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperJoin if ∀Vi ∈ EESHG:(V,E) \ V 0 , ∃Vj ∈ V 0 , such 1647
that Vi , Vj ∈ Ea ; ∀Vi , Vj ∈ V 0 , such that Vi , Vj 6∈ Ea ; and 1648
(v) Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin if it’s either of Neutrosophic 1650
e-SuperHyperJoin, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperJoin, Neutrosophic 1651
v-SuperHyperJoin, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperJoin. 1652
Definition 13.2. ((Neutrosophic) SuperHyperJoin). 1653
(i) an Extreme SuperHyperJoin if it’s either of Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperJoin, 1657
Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperJoin, Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperJoin, and 1658
Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperJoin and C(N SHG) for an Extreme 1659
SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the maximum Extreme cardinality of an 1660
Extreme SuperHyperSet S of high Extreme cardinality of the Extreme 1661
SuperHyperEdges in the consecutive Extreme sequence of Extreme 1662
Extreme SuperHyperJoin; 1664
(ii) a Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin if it’s either of Neutrosophic 1665
v-SuperHyperJoin, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperJoin and C(N SHG) for a 1667
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the maximum Neutrosophic 1668
Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin; 1672
(iii) an Extreme SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either of 1673
Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperJoin, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperJoin, Neutrosophic 1674
v-SuperHyperJoin, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperJoin and C(N SHG) for an 1675
Extreme SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the Extreme 1676
Extreme SuperHyperJoin; and the Extreme power is corresponded to its Extreme 1681
coefficient; 1682
(iv) a Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either of 1683
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the Neutrosophic 1686
Neutrosophic number of the maximum Neutrosophic cardinality of the 1688
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges of a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of high 1689
SuperHyperJoin; and the Neutrosophic power is corresponded to its Neutrosophic 1692
coefficient; 1693
(v) an Extreme R-SuperHyperJoin if it’s either of Neutrosophic 1694
Extreme SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the maximum Extreme cardinality 1697
SuperHyperVertices in the consecutive Extreme sequence of Extreme 1699
Extreme SuperHyperJoin; 1701
(vi) a Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperJoin if it’s either of Neutrosophic 1702
Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin; 1709
(vii) an Extreme R-SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either of 1710
Extreme SuperHyperJoin; and the Extreme power is corresponded to its Extreme 1718
coefficient; 1719
(viii) a Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either of 1720
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of high 1726
SuperHyperJoin; and the Neutrosophic power is corresponded to its Neutrosophic 1729
coefficient. 1730
SuperHyperJoin, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly 1735
SuperHyperJoin. 1743
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin = {E4 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperJoin = {V4 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial = 3z.


C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin = {E4 , E2 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial = 2z 2 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperJoin = {V1 , V4 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial = 15z 2 .

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial = 4z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin = {E3i+13i=0 , E3i+243i=0 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial 6z 8 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperJoin = {V3i+17i=0 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin = {E15 , E16 , E17 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial = z 3 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperJoin = {V3 , V13 , V8 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial =
4 × 5 × 5z 3 .

4 × 5 × 5z 3 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin = {E3i+13i=0 , E23 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperJoin = {V3i+13i=0 , V15 }.

4 × 5 × 5z 3 .

3 × 3z 2 .

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperJoin = {V1 , Vii610=5,7,8 }.
i=4

3 × 3z 2 .



(1 × 5 × 5) + (1 × 2 + 1)z 3 .

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperJoin = {V27 , V2 , V7 , V17 }.
(1 × 1 × 2 + 1)z 4 .

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperJoin = {V27 , V2 , V7 , V17 }.
(1 × 1 × 2 + 1)z 4 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin = {E3i+1i=03 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperJoin = {V2i+1i=05 }.



C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial
= 10 × 6 + 10 × 6 + 12 × 6 + 12 × 6z 2 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin =

= {Ei }i=1 3
.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial
= 3z 3 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperJoin

.
Proof. Let 1817
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
3 3

corresponded to ViEXT ERN AL in the literatures of SuperHyperJoin. The latter is 1821
Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (23), is the SuperHyperJoin. 1825

= {Ei }i=1 3
.
= 3z 3 .

.
Proof. Let 1828
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
3 3

Then 1839
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperJoin = {E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperJoin = {CEN T ER ∈ VESHG:(V,E) }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
Proof. Let 1840

the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (25), is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin. 1850
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperJoin

= (PERFECT MATCHING).
{Ei ∈ EPi ESHG:(V,E) ,
∀Pi ESHG:(V,E) , |Pi ESHG:(V,E) | = min |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈ P ESHG:(V,E) |}.
i
= (OTHERWISE).
{},
If ∃Pi ESHG:(V,E) , |Pi ESHG:(V,E) | =
6 min |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈ P ESHG:(V,E) |.
i
X
i
i=|P ESHG:(V,E) |
ESHG:(V,E)
∈P ESHG:(V,E) |
z min |Pi
where ∀Pi ESHG:(V,E) , |Pi ESHG:(V,E) |
= min |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈ P ESHG:(V,E) |}.
i
= (OTHERWISE)0.
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , Vi
EXT ERN AL
∈ VPEXT
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , i 6= j}.

X X
EXT ERN AL |
Proof. Let 1853
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL

straightforward. Then there’s no at least one SuperHyperJoin. Thus the notion of quasi 1858
may be up but the SuperHyperNotions based on SuperHyperJoin could be applied. 1859
There are only two SuperHyperParts. Thus every SuperHyperPart could have one 1860
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
is a longest SuperHyperJoin taken from a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite 1862
ESHB : (V, E). Thus only some SuperHyperVertices and only 1863
solution 1865
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
SuperHyperModel (26), is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin. 1872

i
= (OTHERWISE).
{},
i
X
i
i=|P ESHG:(V,E) |
ESHG:(V,E)
∈P ESHG:(V,E) |
z min |Pi
i
= (OTHERWISE)0.
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , Vi
EXT ERN AL
∈ VPEXT
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , i 6= j}.

X X
EXT ERN AL |
Proof. Let 1875
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
is a longest SuperHyperJoin taken from a connected Neutrosophic 1876

straightforward. Then there’s no at least one SuperHyperJoin. Thus the notion of quasi 1880
may be up but the SuperHyperNotions based on SuperHyperJoin could be applied. 1881
There are only z 0 SuperHyperParts. Thus every SuperHyperPart could have one 1882
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
solution 1887
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin. 1895

= {Ei }i=1 3
.
= 3z 3 .

.
Proof. Let 1898
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
3 3
is a longest SuperHyperJoin taken from a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel 1899

straightforward. Then there’s at least one SuperHyperJoin. Thus the notion of quasi 1903
isn’t up and the SuperHyperNotions based on SuperHyperJoin could be applied. The 1904
unique embedded SuperHyperJoin proposes some longest SuperHyperJoin excerpt from 1905
some representatives. The latter is straightforward. 1906
14 Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect But As The 1913
Forms 1915
Definition 14.1. (Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect). 1916
(i) Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperPerfect if ∀Ei ∈ EESHG:(V,E) \ E 0 , ∃!Ej ∈ E 0 , 1920
such that Va ∈ Ei , Ej ; 1921
(ii) Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperPerfect if ∀Ei ∈ EESHG:(V,E) \ E 0 , ∃!Ej ∈ E 0 , 1922
such that Va ∈ Ei , Ej ; and 1923
(iii) Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperPerfect if ∀Vi ∈ VESHG:(V,E) \ V 0 , ∃!Vj ∈ V 0 , 1925
such that Vi , Vj ∈ Ea ; 1926
(iv) Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperPerfect if ∀Vi ∈ VESHG:(V,E) \ V 0 , ∃!Vj ∈ V 0 , 1927
such that Vi , Vj ∈ Ea ; and 1928
(v) Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect if it’s either of Neutrosophic 1930
e-SuperHyperPerfect, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperPerfect, Neutrosophic 1931
v-SuperHyperPerfect, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperPerfect. 1932
Definition 14.2. ((Neutrosophic) SuperHyperPerfect). 1933
(i) an Extreme SuperHyperPerfect if it’s either of Neutrosophic 1937
v-SuperHyperPerfect, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperPerfect and C(N SHG) for 1939
Extreme SuperHyperEdges in the consecutive Extreme sequence of Extreme 1942
Extreme SuperHyperPerfect; 1944
(ii) a Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect if it’s either of Neutrosophic 1945
Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect; 1952
(iii) an Extreme SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either of 1953
Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperPerfect, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperPerfect, 1954
Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperPerfect, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperPerfect and 1955
Extreme SuperHyperPerfect; and the Extreme power is corresponded to its 1961
(iv) a Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either 1963
of Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperPerfect, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperPerfect, 1964
the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges of a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of high 1969
SuperHyperPerfect; and the Neutrosophic power is corresponded to its 1972
(v) an Extreme R-SuperHyperPerfect if it’s either of Neutrosophic 1974
Extreme SuperHyperVertices in the consecutive Extreme sequence of Extreme 1979
Extreme SuperHyperPerfect; 1981
(vi) a Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperPerfect if it’s either of Neutrosophic 1982
Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect; 1989
(vii) an Extreme R-SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either 1990
Extreme SuperHyperPerfect; and the Extreme power is corresponded to its 1998
(viii) a Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either 2000
the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of high 2006
SuperHyperPerfect; and the Neutrosophic power is corresponded to its 2009
SuperHyperPerfect, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly 2015
SuperHyperPerfect. 2023
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect = {E4 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperPerfect = {V4 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial = 3z.


C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect = {E4 , E2 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial = 2z 2 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperPerfect = {V1 , V4 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial = 15z 2 .

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial = 4z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect = {E3i+13i=0 , E3i+243i=0 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial 6z 8 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperPerfect = {V3i+17i=0 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect = {E15 , E16 , E17 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial = z 3 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperPerfect = {V3 , V6 , V8 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial =
3 × 4 × 4z 3 .

3 × 4 × 4z 3 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperPerfect = {E3i+13i=0 , E23 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial = 3z 5 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperPerfect = {V3i+13i=0 , V15 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial = 3z 5 .

3 × 4 × 4z 3 .

3 × 2z 2 .

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperPerfect = {V1 , Vii610=5,7,8 }.
i=4

3 × 3z 2 .



C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperPerfect = {V2 , V7 , V17 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial =
(1 × 5 × 5) + (1 × 2 + 1)z 3 .

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperPerfect = {V27 , V2 , V7 , V17 }.
(1 × 1 × 2 + 1)z 4 .

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperPerfect = {V27 , V2 , V7 , V17 }.
(1 × 1 × 2 + 1)z 4 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect = {E3i+1i=03 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperPerfect = {V2i+1i=05 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial = 2z 6 .



C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperPerfect = {V3 , V6 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial
= 10 × 6 + 10 × 6 + 12 × 6 + 12 × 6z 2 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect =

= {Ei }i=1 3
.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial
= 3z 3 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperPerfect

.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial
Proof. Let 2097
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
3 3

corresponded to ViEXT ERN AL in the literatures of SuperHyperPerfect. The latter is 2101
Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (23), is the SuperHyperPerfect. 2105
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect =

= {Ei }i=1 3
.
= 3z 3 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperPerfect

.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial
Proof. Let 2108
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
3 3

Then 2119
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect = {E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperPerfect = {CEN T ER ∈ VESHG:(V,E) }.
Proof. Let 2120

the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (25), is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect. 2130
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperPerfect

i
= (OTHERWISE).
{},
i
X
i
i=|P ESHG:(V,E) |
ESHG:(V,E)
∈P ESHG:(V,E) |
z min |Pi
i
= (OTHERWISE)0.
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , Vi
EXT ERN AL
∈ VPEXT
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , i 6= j}.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial

X X
EXT ERN AL |
Proof. Let 2133
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL

straightforward. Then there’s no at least one SuperHyperPerfect. Thus the notion of 2138
quasi may be up but the SuperHyperNotions based on SuperHyperPerfect could be 2139
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
is a longest SuperHyperPerfect taken from a connected Neutrosophic 2142
solution 2145
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
SuperHyperModel (26), is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect. 2152

i
= (OTHERWISE).
{},
i
X
i
i=|P ESHG:(V,E) |
ESHG:(V,E)
∈P ESHG:(V,E) |
z min |Pi
i
= (OTHERWISE)0.
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , Vi
EXT ERN AL
∈ VPEXT
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , i 6= j}.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial

X X
EXT ERN AL |
Proof. Let 2155
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
is a longest SuperHyperPerfect taken from a connected Neutrosophic 2156

straightforward. Then there’s no at least one SuperHyperPerfect. Thus the notion of 2160
quasi may be up but the SuperHyperNotions based on SuperHyperPerfect could be 2161
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
solution 2167
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect. 2175
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect = {E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperPerfect = {CEN T ER ∈ VESHG:(V,E) }.
Proof. Let 2178

is a longest SuperHyperPerfect taken from a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel 2179

straightforward. Then there’s at least one SuperHyperPerfect. Thus the notion of quasi 2183
isn’t up and the SuperHyperNotions based on SuperHyperPerfect could be applied. The 2184
unique embedded SuperHyperPerfect proposes some longest SuperHyperPerfect excerpt 2185
from some representatives. The latter is straightforward. 2186
15 Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal But As The 2193
Forms 2195
Definition 15.1. (Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal). 2196
(i) Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperTotal if ∀Ei ∈ EESHG:(V,E) , ∃!Ej ∈ E 0 , such 2200
that Va ∈ Ei , Ej ; 2201
(ii) Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperTotal if ∀Ei ∈ EESHG:(V,E) , ∃!Ej ∈ E 0 , such 2202
that Va ∈ Ei , Ej ; and 2203
(iii) Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperTotal if ∀Vi ∈ VESHG:(V,E) , ∃!Vj ∈ V 0 , such 2205
that Vi , Vj ∈ Ea ; 2206
(iv) Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperTotal if ∀Vi ∈ VESHG:(V,E) , ∃!Vj ∈ V 0 , such 2207
that Vi , Vj ∈ Ea ; and 2208
(v) Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal if it’s either of Neutrosophic 2210
e-SuperHyperTotal, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperTotal, Neutrosophic 2211
v-SuperHyperTotal, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperTotal. 2212
Definition 15.2. ((Neutrosophic) SuperHyperTotal). 2213
(i) an Extreme SuperHyperTotal if it’s either of Neutrosophic 2217
v-SuperHyperTotal, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperTotal and C(N SHG) for an 2219
SuperHyperEdges in the consecutive Extreme sequence of Extreme 2222
Extreme SuperHyperTotal; 2224
(ii) a Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal if it’s either of Neutrosophic 2225
v-SuperHyperTotal, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperTotal and C(N SHG) for a 2227
Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal; 2232
(iii) an Extreme SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either of 2233
Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperTotal, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperTotal, Neutrosophic 2234
Extreme SuperHyperTotal; and the Extreme power is corresponded to its Extreme 2241
coefficient; 2242
(iv) a Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either of 2243
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges of a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of high 2249
SuperHyperTotal; and the Neutrosophic power is corresponded to its 2252
(v) an Extreme R-SuperHyperTotal if it’s either of Neutrosophic 2254
SuperHyperVertices in the consecutive Extreme sequence of Extreme 2259
Extreme SuperHyperTotal; 2261
(vi) a Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperTotal if it’s either of Neutrosophic 2262
Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal; 2269
(vii) an Extreme R-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either of 2270
Extreme SuperHyperTotal; and the Extreme power is corresponded to its Extreme 2278
coefficient; 2279
(viii) a Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either of 2280
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of high 2286
SuperHyperTotal; and the Neutrosophic power is corresponded to its 2289
SuperHyperTotal, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly 2295
SuperHyperTotal. 2303
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperTotal = {E4 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperTotal = {V4 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial = 3z.


C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi- = {E4 , E2 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial = 2z 2 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperTotal = {V1 , V4 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial = 15z 2 .

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial = 4z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal = {Ei+19i=0 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial 20z 10 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperTotal = {Vi+19i=0 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial = 20z 10 .
C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperTotal = {E12 , E13 , E14 }.

C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial = z 3 .
C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperTotal = {V12 , V13 , V14 }.
C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial = z 3 .
C(N SHG)Extreme Quasi-SuperHyperTotal = {E4 }.

C(N SHG)Extreme Quasi-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial =
3 × 4 × 4z 3 .

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial 10z 10 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperTotal = {Vi+19i=0 }.
C(N SHG)Extreme Quasi-SuperHyperTotal = {E5 }.

C(N SHG)Extreme Quasi-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
3 × 4 × 4z 3 .
C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperTotal = {E1 , E6 , E7 , E8 }.

C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial = 2z 4 .
C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperTotal = {V1 , V5 }.
C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial = 3z 2 .
C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperTotal = {E1 , E2 }.

C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperTotal = {V1 , Vii68=4,5,6 }.
i=1




4 × 3z 3 .

C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperTotal = {V1 , V2 , V6 , V17 }.
4 × 3z 4 .

C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperTotal = {V1 , V2 , V6 , V17 }.
2 × 4 × 3z 4 .

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial = 11z 10 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperTotal = {Vi+2i=011 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial = 11z 10 .

C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperTotal = {V1 , V }.
C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial
= |(|V | − 1)z 2 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal = {E1 , E2 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial = 2z 2 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperTotal = {V1 , V2 }.

C(N SHG)Extreme R-Quasi-SuperHyperTotal = {V3 , V10 , V6 }.
C(N SHG)Extreme R-Quasi-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial
= 3 × 6z 3 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal =

|E | −2
= {Ei }i=1ESHG:(V,E) Neutrosophic Cardinality .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial
= z |EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality −2 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperTotal
|E | −2
= {ViEXT ERN AL }i=1ESHG:(V,E) Neutrosophic Cardinality .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial
Y
= |V EXT ERN AL ESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality z |EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality −2
Proof. Let 2377
P :
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
V3EXT ERN AL , E3 ,
...

corresponded to ViEXT ERN AL in the literatures of SuperHyperTotal. The latter is 2381
Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (23), is the SuperHyperTotal. 2385
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal =

|E | −2
= {Ei }i=1ESHG:(V,E) Neutrosophic Cardinality .
= (|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality − 1)
z |EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality −2 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperTotal
|E | −2
= {ViEXT ERN AL }i=1ESHG:(V,E) Neutrosophic Cardinality .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial
Y
= |V EXT ERN AL ESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality z |EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality −2
Proof. Let 2388
P :
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
V3EXT ERN AL , E3 ,
...,
E |E|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality −1 .
, V EXT ERN AL |EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality −1

Then 2399
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal = {Ei , Ej ∈ EESHG:(V,E) }.

= |i(i − 1) | Ei ∈ EESHG:(V,E)|Neutrosophic Cardinality |z 2 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperTotal = {CEN T ER, Vj ∈ VESHG:(V,E) }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial =
(|VESHG:(V,E)|Neutrosophic Cardinality |) choose (|VESHG:(V,E)|Neutrosophic Cardinality | − 1)
z2.
Proof. Let 2400
P : ViEXT ERN AL , Ei , CEN T ER, Ej .

the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (25), is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal. 2410
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal

= {Ea ∈ EPi ESHG:(V,E) ,
i
ESHG:(V,E)
∈P ESHG:(V,E) |
= z min |Pi
i
= {VaEXT ERN AL ∈ VPEXT
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , Vb
EXT ERN AL
∈ VPEXT
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , i 6= j}.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial

X X
EXT ERN AL |
Proof. Let 2413
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2

straightforward. Then there’s no at least one SuperHyperTotal. Thus the notion of 2418
quasi may be up but the SuperHyperNotions based on SuperHyperTotal could be 2419
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
is a longest SuperHyperTotal taken from a connected Neutrosophic 2422
solution 2425
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
SuperHyperModel (26), is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal. 2432

i
ESHG:(V,E)
∈P ESHG:(V,E) |
= z min |Pi
i
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , Vb
EXT ERN AL
∈ VPEXT
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , i 6= j}.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial

X X
EXT ERN AL |
Proof. Let 2435
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
is a longest SuperHyperTotal taken from a connected Neutrosophic 2436

straightforward. Then there’s no at least one SuperHyperTotal. Thus the notion of 2440
quasi may be up but the SuperHyperNotions based on SuperHyperTotal could be 2441
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
solution 2447
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal. 2455
∗
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal = {Ei , Ej ∈ EESHG:(V,E) }.
∗
= |i(i − 1) | Ei ∈ EESHG:(V,E)|Neutrosophic Cardinality
|z 2 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperTotal = {CEN T ER, Vj ∈ VESHG:(V,E) }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial =
(|VESHG:(V,E)|Neutrosophic Cardinality |) choose (|VESHG:(V,E)|Neutrosophic Cardinality | − 1)
z2.
Proof. Let 2458
P : ViEXT ERN AL , Ei∗ , CEN T ER, Ej .
is a longest SuperHyperTotal taken from a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel 2459

straightforward. Then there’s at least one SuperHyperTotal. Thus the notion of quasi 2463
isn’t up and the SuperHyperNotions based on SuperHyperTotal could be applied. The 2464
unique embedded SuperHyperTotal proposes some longest SuperHyperTotal excerpt 2465
from some representatives. The latter is straightforward. 2466
16 Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnected But As 2473
The Extensions Excerpt From Dense And Super 2474
Forms 2475
Definition 16.1. (Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic 2476
SuperHyperConnected). 2477
(i) Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperConnected if 2481
∀Ei ∈ EESHG:(V,E) \ E 0 , ∃Ej ∈ E 0 , such that Va ∈ Ei , Ej ; and ∀Ei , Ej ∈ E 0 , such 2482
that Va 6∈ Ei , Ej ; 2483
(ii) Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperConnected if 2484
∀Ei ∈ EESHG:(V,E) \ E 0 , ∃Ej ∈ E 0 , such that Va ∈ Ei , Ej ; ∀Ei , Ej ∈ E 0 , such 2485
that Va 6∈ Ei , Ej ; and 2486
(iii) Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperConnected if 2488
∀Vi ∈ EESHG:(V,E) \ V 0 , ∃Vj ∈ V 0 , such that Vi , Vj 6∈ Ea ; and ∀Vi , Vj ∈ V 0 , such 2489
that Vi , Vj 6∈ Ea ; 2490
(iv) Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperConnected if 2491
∀Vi ∈ EESHG:(V,E) \ V 0 , ∃Vj ∈ V 0 , such that Vi , Vj ∈ Ea ; ∀Vi , Vj ∈ V 0 , such that 2492
Vi , Vj 6∈ Ea ; and 2493
(v) Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnected if it’s either of Neutrosophic 2495
e-SuperHyperConnected, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperConnected, Neutrosophic 2496
v-SuperHyperConnected, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperConnected. 2497
Definition 16.2. ((Neutrosophic) SuperHyperConnected). 2498
(i) an Extreme SuperHyperConnected if it’s either of Neutrosophic 2502
v-SuperHyperConnected, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperConnected and 2504
of the Extreme SuperHyperEdges in the consecutive Extreme sequence of Extreme 2507
Extreme SuperHyperConnected; 2509
(ii) a Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnected if it’s either of Neutrosophic 2510
Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnected; 2517
(iii) an Extreme SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either 2518
of Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperConnected, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperConnected, 2519
Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperConnected, and Neutrosophic 2520
rv-SuperHyperConnected and C(N SHG) for an Extreme SuperHyperGraph 2521
N SHG : (V, E) is the Extreme SuperHyperPolynomial contains the Extreme 2522
coefficients defined as the Extreme number of the maximum Extreme cardinality 2523
of the Extreme SuperHyperEdges of an Extreme SuperHyperSet S of high 2524
SuperHyperVertices such that they form the Extreme SuperHyperConnected; and 2526
the Extreme power is corresponded to its Extreme coefficient; 2527
(iv) a Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s 2528
either of Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperConnected, Neutrosophic 2529
re-SuperHyperConnected, Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperConnected, and 2530
Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperConnected and C(N SHG) for a Neutrosophic 2531
maximum Neutrosophic cardinality of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges of a 2534
they form the Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnected; and the Neutrosophic power is 2537
corresponded to its Neutrosophic coefficient; 2538
(v) an Extreme R-SuperHyperConnected if it’s either of Neutrosophic 2539
of the Extreme SuperHyperVertices in the consecutive Extreme sequence of 2544
Extreme SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form 2545
the Extreme SuperHyperConnected; 2546
(vi) a Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperConnected if it’s either of Neutrosophic 2547
Neutrosophic cardinality of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of a 2551
they form the Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnected; 2554
(vii) an Extreme R-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s 2555
Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperConnected and C(N SHG) for an Extreme 2558
SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the Extreme SuperHyperPolynomial 2559
contains the Extreme coefficients defined as the Extreme number of the maximum 2560
Extreme cardinality of the Extreme SuperHyperVertices of an Extreme 2561
SuperHyperSet S of high Extreme cardinality consecutive Extreme 2562
Extreme SuperHyperConnected; and the Extreme power is corresponded to its 2564
(viii) a Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s 2566
Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperConnected and C(N SHG) for a Neutrosophic 2569
maximum Neutrosophic cardinality of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of a 2572
they form the Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnected; and the Neutrosophic power is 2575
corresponded to its Neutrosophic coefficient. 2576
SuperHyperConnected, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly 2581
SuperHyperConnected. 2589
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnected = {E4 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperConnected = {V4 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = 3z.


C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnected = {E1 , E2 , E4 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = z 3 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperConnected = {V1 , V4 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = 15z 2 .

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = 4z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperConnected = {Ei+19i=0 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial 20z 10 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperConnected = {Vi+19i=0 }.
C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperConnected = {E12 , E13 , E14 }.

C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = z 3 .
C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperConnected = {V12 , V13 , V14 }.
C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = z 3 .
C(N SHG)Extreme Quasi-SuperHyperConnected = {E4 }.

C(N SHG)Extreme Quasi-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial =
3 × 4 × 4z 3 .

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial 10z 10 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperConnected = {Vi+119
i=11
, V22 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = 20z 10 .
C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperConnected = {E5 }.

C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
3 × 4 × 4z 3 .
C(N SHG)Extreme Quasi-SuperHyperConnected = {E1 , E6 , E7 , E8 }.

C(N SHG)Extreme Quasi-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = 2z 4 .
C(N SHG)Extreme R-Quasi-SuperHyperConnected = {V1 , V5 }.
C(N SHG)Extreme R-Quasi-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = 3z 2 .
C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperConnected = {E1 , E2 }.

C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = 5z 2 .
C(N SHG)Extreme R-Quasi-SuperHyperConnected = {V1 , Vii68=4,5,6 }.
i=1
C(N SHG)Extreme R-Quasi-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = z 5 .
C(N SHG)Extreme Quasi-SuperHyperConnected = {E3 , E9 , E6 }.

C(N SHG)Extreme Quasi-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = 3z 3 .
C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperConnected = {V1 , V5 }.
C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = 3z 2 .

C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperConnected = {V1 }.
C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = z.

C(N SHG)Extreme Quasi-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = z 3 .
C(N SHG)Extreme R-Quasi-SuperHyperConnected = {V2 , V3 , V4 }.
C(N SHG)Extreme R-Quasi-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = z 3 .
C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperConnected = {E2 , E3 , E4 }.

C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = z 3 .
4 × 3z 3 .

C(N SHG)Extreme R-Quasi-SuperHyperConnected = {V1 , V2 , V6 , V17 }.
C(N SHG)Extreme R-Quasi-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial =
4 × 3z 4 .

C(N SHG)Extreme R-Quasi-SuperHyperConnected = {V1 , V2 , V6 , V17 }.
C(N SHG)Extreme R-Quasi-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial =
2 × 4 × 3z 4 .

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = 11z 10 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperConnected = {Vi+2i=011 }.

C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = 10z.
C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperConnected = {V1 }.
C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = z.

C(N SHG)Extreme Quasi-SuperHyperConnected = {E3 , E4 }.

C(N SHG)Extreme R-Quasi-SuperHyperConnected = {V3 , V10 , V6 }.
C(N SHG)Extreme R-Quasi-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial
= 3 × 6z 3 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperConnected =

−2
= {Ei }i=1 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial
|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic −2
=z Cardinality .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperConnected
= {ViEXT ERN AL }i=1 Cardinality
.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial
|E | −2
Y
= |V EXT ERN AL ESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality z ESHG:(V,E) Neutrosophic Cardinality
Proof. Let 2663
P :
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
V3EXT ERN AL , E3 ,
...,
E|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality −1 , V EXT ERN AL |EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality −1 .

corresponded to ViEXT ERN AL in the literatures of SuperHyperConnected. The latter is 2667
Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (23), is the SuperHyperConnected. 2671
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperConnected =

−2
= {Ei }i=1 .
= (|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality − 1)
z Cardinality .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperConnected
= {ViEXT ERN AL }i=1 Cardinality
.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial
|E | −2
Y
= |V EXT ERN AL ESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality z ESHG:(V,E) Neutrosophic Cardinality
Proof. Let 2674
P :
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
V3EXT ERN AL , E3 ,
...,
E|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality −1 , V EXT ERN AL |EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality −1 .

Then 2685
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnected = {Ei ∈ EESHG:(V,E) }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial
= |i | Ei ∈ |EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperConnected = {CEN T ER ∈ VESHG:(V,E) }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
Proof. Let 2686
P : ViEXT ERN AL , Ei , CEN T ER, Ej .


the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (25), is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnected. 2696
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperConnected

i
ESHG:(V,E)
∈P ESHG:(V,E) |
= z min |Pi
i
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperConnected
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , Vb
EXT ERN AL
∈ VPEXT
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , i 6= j}.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial

X X
EXT ERN AL |
Proof. Let 2699
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2

straightforward. Then there’s no at least one SuperHyperConnected. Thus the notion of 2704
quasi may be up but the SuperHyperNotions based on SuperHyperConnected could be 2705
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
is a longest SuperHyperConnected taken from a connected Neutrosophic 2708
solution 2711
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
SuperHyperModel (26), is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnected. 2718
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperConnected

i
ESHG:(V,E)
∈P ESHG:(V,E) |
= z min |Pi
i
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperConnected
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , Vb
EXT ERN AL
∈ VPEXT
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , i 6= j}.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial

X X
EXT ERN AL |
Proof. Let 2721
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2

straightforward. Then there’s no at least one SuperHyperConnected. Thus the notion of 2726
quasi may be up but the SuperHyperNotions based on SuperHyperConnected could be 2727
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
solution 2733
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnected. 2741
∗
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnected = {Ei ∈ EESHG:(V,E) }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial
= |i | Ei ∈ |E ∗ ESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality |z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperConnected = {CEN T ER ∈ VESHG:(V,E) }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
Proof. Let 2744
P : V EXT ERN AL i , E ∗ i , CEN T ER, Ej .
SuperHyperWheel ESHW : (V, E). There’s a new way to redefine as 2746

straightforward. Then there’s at least one SuperHyperConnected. Thus the notion of 2749
quasi isn’t up and the SuperHyperNotions based on SuperHyperConnected could be 2750
applied. The unique embedded SuperHyperConnected proposes some longest 2751
SuperHyperConnected excerpt from some representatives. The latter is 2752
17 Background 2760
There are some scientific researches covering the topic of this research. In what follows, 2761
there are some discussion and literature reviews about them date back on February 19, 2762
2023. 2763
First article is titled “properties of SuperHyperGraph and neutrosophic 2764
SuperHyperGraph” in Ref. [1] by Henry Garrett (2022). It’s first step toward the 2765
research on neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs. This research article is published on the 2766
journal “Neutrosophic Sets and Systems” in issue 49 and the pages 531-561. In this 2767
research article, different types of notions like dominating, resolving, K-Number, 2768
Eulerian(Hamiltonian) neutrosophic path, n-Eulerian(Hamiltonian) neutrosophic path, 2769
zero forcing number, zero forcing neutrosophic- number, independent number, 2770
independent neutrosophic-number, clique number, clique neutrosophic-number, 2771
matching number, matching neutrosophic-number, girth, neutrosophic girth, 2772
1-zero-forcing number, 1-zero- forcing neutrosophic-number, failed 1-zero-forcing 2773
number, failed 1-zero-forcing neutrosophic-number, global- offensive alliance, t-offensive 2774
alliance, t-defensive alliance, t-powerful alliance, and global-powerful alliance are defined 2775
in SuperHyperGraph and neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. Some Classes of 2776
SuperHyperGraph and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph are cases of research. Some 2777
results are applied in family of SuperHyperGraph and neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. 2778
Thus this research article has concentrated on the vast notions and introducing the 2779
majority of notions. 2780
The seminal paper and groundbreaking article is titled “neutrosophic co-degree and 2781
neutrosophic degree alongside chromatic numbers in the setting of some classes related 2782
to neutrosophic hypergraphs” in Ref. [2] by Henry Garrett (2022). In this research 2783
article, a novel approach is implemented on SuperHyperGraph and neutrosophic 2784
SuperHyperGraph based on general forms without using neutrosophic classes of 2785
neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. It’s published in prestigious and fancy journal is 2786
entitled “Journal of Current Trends in Computer Science Research (JCTCSR)” with 2787
ISO abbreviation “J Curr Trends Comp Sci Res” in volume 1 and issue 1 with pages 2788
06-14. The research article studies deeply with choosing neutrosophic hypergraphs 2789
instead of neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. It’s the breakthrough toward independent 2790
results based on initial background. 2791
The seminal paper and groundbreaking article is titled “Super Hyper Dominating 2792
and Super Hyper Resolving on Neutrosophic Super Hyper Graphs and Their Directions 2793
in Game Theory and Neutrosophic Super Hyper Classes” in Ref. [3] by Henry Garrett 2794
(2022). In this research article, a novel approach is implemented on SuperHyperGraph 2795
and neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph based on fundamental SuperHyperNumber and 2796
using neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses of neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. It’s 2797
published in prestigious and fancy journal is entitled “Journal of Mathematical 2798
Techniques and Computational Mathematics(JMTCM)” with ISO abbreviation “J Math 2799
Techniques Comput Math” in volume 1 and issue 3 with pages 242-263. The research 2800
article studies deeply with choosing directly neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph and 2801
SuperHyperGraph. It’s the breakthrough toward independent results based on initial 2802
background and fundamental SuperHyperNumbers. 2803
The seminal paper and groundbreaking article is titled “Some Super Hyper Degrees 2804
and Co-Super Hyper Degrees on Neutrosophic Super Hyper Graphs And Super Hyper 2805
Graphs Alongside Applications in Cancer’s Treatments” in Ref. [52] by Henry Garrett 2806
(2023). In this research article, a novel approach is implemented on SuperHyperGraph 2807
and neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph based on fundamental notions and using vital tools 2808
in Cancer’s Treatments. It’s published in prestigious and fancy journal is entitled 2809
“Journal of Mathematical Techniques and Computational Mathematics(JMTCM)” with 2810
ISO abbreviation “J Math Techniques Comput Math” in volume 2 and issue 1 with 2811
pages 35-47. The research article studies deeply with choosing directly neutrosophic 2812
SuperHyperGraph and SuperHyperGraph. It’s the breakthrough toward independent 2813
results based on initial background and fundamental SuperHyperNumbers. 2814
In some articles are titled “0039 — Closing Numbers and Super-Closing Numbers as 2815
(Dual)Resolving and (Dual)K-Number alongside (Dual)Dominating in 2816
(Neutrosophic)n-SuperHyperGraph” in Ref. [5] by Henry Garrett (2022), “0049 — 2817
(Failed)1-Zero-Forcing Number in Neutrosophic Graphs” in Ref. [6] by Henry Garrett 2818
(2022), “Extreme SuperHyperClique as the Firm Scheme of Confrontation under 2819
Cancer’s Recognition as the Model in The Setting of (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” 2820
in Ref. [7] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Uncertainty On The Act And Effect Of Cancer 2821
Alongside The Foggy Positions Of Cells Toward Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperClique 2822
inside Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Titled Cancer’s Recognition” in Ref. [8] by 2823
Henry Garrett (2022), “Neutrosophic Version Of Separates Groups Of Cells In Cancer’s 2824
Recognition On Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [9] by Henry Garrett (2022), 2825
“The Shift Paradigm To Classify Separately The Cells and Affected Cells Toward The 2826
Totality Under Cancer’s Recognition By New Multiple Definitions On the Sets 2827
Polynomials Alongside Numbers In The (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperMatching Theory 2828
Based on SuperHyperGraph and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph” in Ref. [10] by 2829
Henry Garrett (2022), “Breaking the Continuity and Uniformity of Cancer In The 2830
Worst Case of Full Connections With Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique In Cancer’s 2831
Recognition Applied in (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [11] by Henry 2832
Garrett (2022), “Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperStable as the Survivors on the 2833
Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition Based on Uncertainty to All Modes in Neutrosophic 2834
SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [12] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Extremism of the Attacked 2835
Body Under the Cancer’s Circumstances Where Cancer’s Recognition Titled 2836
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [13] by Henry Garrett (2022), 2837
“(Neutrosophic) 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in Cancer’s Recognitions And 2838
“Neutrosophic Messy-Style SuperHyperGraphs To Form Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable 2840
To Act on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognitions In Special ViewPoints” in Ref. [15] by 2841
Henry Garrett (2022), “Neutrosophic 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in the 2842
SuperHyperFunction To Use Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs on Cancer’s 2843
Neutrosophic Recognition And Beyond” in Ref. [16] by Henry Garrett (2022), 2844
“(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperStable on Cancer’s Recognition by Well- 2845
SuperHyperModelled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs ” in Ref. [17] by Henry 2846
Garrett (2022), “Neutrosophic Messy-Style SuperHyperGraphs To Form Neutrosophic 2847
SuperHyperStable To Act on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognitions In Special ViewPoints” 2848
in Ref. [13] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Basic Notions on (Neutrosophic) 2849
SuperHyperForcing And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling in Cancer’s Recognitions 2850
And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [18] by Henry Garrett (2022), 2851
“Neutrosophic Messy-Style SuperHyperGraphs To Form Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable 2852
To Act on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognitions In Special ViewPoints” in Ref. [19] by 2853
Henry Garrett (2022),“(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s Recognitions 2854
Featuring (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperAlliances” in Ref. [20] by 2855
Henry Garrett (2022), “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperAlliances With 2856
SuperHyperDefensive and SuperHyperOffensive Type-SuperHyperSet On 2857
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling of 2858
Cancer’s Recognitions And Related (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperClasses” in Ref. [21] by 2859
Henry Garrett (2022), “SuperHyperGirth on SuperHyperGraph and Neutrosophic 2860
SuperHyperGraph With SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s Recognitions” in Ref. [22] by 2861
Henry Garrett (2022), “Some SuperHyperDegrees and Co-SuperHyperDegrees on 2862
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs and SuperHyperGraphs Alongside Applications in 2863
Cancer’s Treatments” in Ref. [23] by Henry Garrett (2022), “SuperHyperDominating 2864
and SuperHyperResolving on Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs And Their Directions in 2865
Game Theory and Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses” in Ref. [24] by Henry Garrett 2866
(2022), “SuperHyperMatching By (R-)Definitions And Polynomials To Monitor 2867
Cancer’s Recognition In Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [66] by Henry 2868
Garrett (2023), “The Focus on The Partitions Obtained By Parallel Moves In The 2869
Cancer’s Extreme Recognition With Different Types of Extreme SuperHyperMatching 2870
Set and Polynomial on (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [67] by Henry 2871
Garrett (2023), “Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique Decides the Failures on the 2872
Cancer’s Recognition in the Perfect Connections of Cancer’s Attacks By 2873
SuperHyperModels Named (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [68] by Henry 2874
Garrett (2023), “Indeterminacy On The All Possible Connections of Cells In Front of 2875
Cancer’s Attacks In The Terms of Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperClique on Cancer’s 2876
Recognition called Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [69] by Henry Garrett 2877
(2023), “Perfect Directions Toward Idealism in Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition 2878
Forwarding Neutrosophic SuperHyperClique on Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs” in 2879
Ref. [72] by Henry Garrett (2023), “Demonstrating Complete Connections in Every 2880
Embedded Regions and Sub-Regions in the Terms of Cancer’s Recognition and 2881
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperClique” in 2882
Ref. [73] by Henry Garrett (2023), “Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic 2883
Regions titled neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperStable in Cancer’s Neutrosophic 2884
Recognition modeled in the Form of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [76] by 2885
Henry Garrett (2023), “Using the Tool As (Neutrosophic) Failed SuperHyperStable To 2886
SuperHyperModel Cancer’s Recognition Titled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in 2887
Ref. [79] by Henry Garrett (2023), “Neutrosophic Messy-Style SuperHyperGraphs To 2888
Form Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable To Act on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognitions In 2889
Special ViewPoints” in Ref. [80] by Henry Garrett (2023), “(Neutrosophic) 2890
SuperHyperStable on Cancer’s Recognition by Well-SuperHyperModelled 2891
“Neutrosophic 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in the SuperHyperFunction To Use 2893
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition And Beyond” 2894
in Ref. [82] by Henry Garrett (2022), “(Neutrosophic) 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in 2895
Cancer’s Recognitions And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [83] by Henry 2896
Garrett (2022), “Basic Notions on (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperForcing And 2897
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling in Cancer’s Recognitions And (Neutrosophic) 2898
SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [84] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Basic Neutrosophic Notions 2899
Concerning SuperHyperDominating and Neutrosophic SuperHyperResolving in 2900
SuperHyperGraph” in Ref. [95] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Initial Material of 2901
Neutrosophic Preliminaries to Study Some Neutrosophic Notions Based on 2902
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) in Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)” in 2903
Ref. [96] by Henry Garrett (2022), there are some endeavors to formalize the basic 2904
SuperHyperNotions about neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph and SuperHyperGraph. 2905
Some scientific studies and scientific researches about neutrosophic graphs, are 2906
proposed as book in Ref. [97] by Henry Garrett (2022) which is indexed by Google 2907
Scholar and has more than 3230 readers in Scribd. It’s titled “Beyond Neutrosophic 2908
Graphs” and published by Ohio: E-publishing: Educational Publisher 1091 West 1st 2909
Ave Grandview Heights, Ohio 43212 United State. This research book covers different 2910
types of notions and settings in neutrosophic graph theory and neutrosophic 2911
SuperHyperGraph theory. 2912
Also, some scientific studies and scientific researches about neutrosophic graphs, are 2913
proposed as book in Ref. [98] by Henry Garrett (2022) which is indexed by Google 2914
Scholar and has more than 4117 readers in Scribd. It’s titled “Neutrosophic Duality” 2915
and published by Florida: GLOBAL KNOWLEDGE - Publishing House 848 Brickell 2916
Ave Ste 950 Miami, Florida 33131 United States. This research book presents different 2917
types of notions SuperHyperResolving and SuperHyperDominating in the setting of 2918
duality in neutrosophic graph theory and neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph theory. This 2919
research book has scrutiny on the complement of the intended set and the intended set, 2920
simultaneously. It’s smart to consider a set but acting on its complement that what’s 2921
done in this research book which is popular in the terms of high readers in Scribd. 2922
See the seminal scientific researches [1–3]. The formalization of the notions on the 2923
framework of Extreme SuperHyperDominating, Neutrosophic SuperHyperDominating 2924
theory, and (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs theory at [5–96]. Two popular scientific 2925
research books in Scribd in the terms of high readers, 3230 and 4117 respectively, on 2926
neutrosophic science is on [97, 98]. 2927
– 2928
References 2929
1. Henry Garrett, “Properties of SuperHyperGraph and Neutrosophic 2930
SuperHyperGraph”, Neutrosophic Sets and Systems 49 (2022) 531-561 (doi: 2931
10.5281/zenodo.6456413). 2932
(http://fs.unm.edu/NSS/NeutrosophicSuperHyperGraph34.pdf). 2933
(https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/nss journal/vol49/iss1/34). 2934
2. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Co-degree and Neutrosophic Degree alongside 2935
Chromatic Numbers in the Setting of Some Classes Related to Neutrosophic 2936
Hypergraphs”, J Curr Trends Comp Sci Res 1(1) (2022) 06-14. 2937
3. Henry Garrett, “Super Hyper Dominating and Super Hyper Resolving on 2938
Neutrosophic Super Hyper Graphs and Their Directions in Game Theory and 2939
Neutrosophic Super Hyper Classes”, J Math Techniques Comput Math 1(3) 2940
(2022) 242-263. (doi: 10.33140/JMTCM.01.03.09) 2941
4. Henry Garrett, “Some Super Hyper Degrees and Co-Super Hyper Degrees on 2942
Neutrosophic Super Hyper Graphs And Super Hyper Graphs Alongside 2943
Applications in Cancer’s Treatments”, J Math Techniques Comput Math 2(1) 2944
(2023) 35-47. (https://www.opastpublishers.com/open-access-articles/some- 2945
super-hyper-degrees-and-cosuper-hyper-degrees-on-neutrosophic-super-hyper- 2946
graphs-and-super-hyper-graphs-alongside-a.pdf) 2947
5. Garrett, Henry. “0039 — Closing Numbers and Super-Closing Numbers as 2948
(Dual)Resolving and (Dual)K-Number alongside (Dual)Dominating in 2949
(Neutrosophic)n-SuperHyperGraph.” CERN European Organization for Nuclear 2950
Research - Zenodo, Nov. 2022. CERN European Organization for Nuclear 2951
Research, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6319942. 2952
https://oa.mg/work/10.5281/zenodo.6319942 2953
6. Garrett, Henry. “0049 — (Failed)1-Zero-Forcing Number in Neutrosophic 2954
Graphs.” CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research - Zenodo, Feb. 2955
2022. CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research, 2956
https://doi.org/10.13140/rg.2.2.35241.26724. 2957
https://oa.mg/work/10.13140/rg.2.2.35241.26724 2958
7. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperClique as the Firm Scheme of 2959
Confrontation under Cancer’s Recognition as the Model in The Setting of 2960
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010308 (doi: 2961
10.20944/preprints202301.0308.v1). 2962
8. Henry Garrett, “Uncertainty On The Act And Effect Of Cancer Alongside The 2963
Foggy Positions Of Cells Toward Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperClique inside 2964
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Titled Cancer’s Recognition”, Preprints 2023, 2965
2023010282 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0282.v1). 2966
9. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Version Of Separates Groups Of Cells In 2967
Cancer’s Recognition On Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2968
2023010267 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0267.v1). 2969
10. Henry Garrett, “The Shift Paradigm To Classify Separately The Cells and 2970
Affected Cells Toward The Totality Under Cancer’s Recognition By New 2971
Multiple Definitions On the Sets Polynomials Alongside Numbers In The 2972
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperMatching Theory Based on SuperHyperGraph and 2973
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph”, Preprints 2023, 2023010265 (doi: 2974
10.20944/preprints202301.0265.v1). 2975
11. Henry Garrett, “Breaking the Continuity and Uniformity of Cancer In The 2976
Worst Case of Full Connections With Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique In 2977
Cancer’s Recognition Applied in (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2978
2023, 2023010262,(doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0262.v1). 2979
12. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperStable as the Survivors on the 2980
Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition Based on Uncertainty to All Modes in 2981
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010240 (doi: 2982
10.20944/preprints202301.0240.v1). 2983
13. Henry Garrett, “Extremism of the Attacked Body Under the Cancer’s 2984
Circumstances Where Cancer’s Recognition Titled (Neutrosophic) 2985
SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010224, (doi: 2986
10.20944/preprints202301.0224.v1). 2987
14. Henry Garrett, “(Neutrosophic) 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in Cancer’s 2988
Recognitions And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2989
2023010105 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0105.v1). 2990
15. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Messy-Style SuperHyperGraphs To Form 2991
Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable To Act on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognitions 2992
In Special ViewPoints”, Preprints 2023, 2023010088 (doi: 2993
10.20944/preprints202301.0088.v1). 2994
16. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in the 2995
Neutrosophic Recognition And Beyond ”, Preprints 2023, 2023010044 2997
17. Henry Garrett, “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperStable on Cancer’s Recognition by 2998
Well- SuperHyperModelled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2999
2023010043 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0043.v1). 3000
18. Henry Garrett, “Basic Notions on (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperForcing And 3001
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling in Cancer’s Recognitions And 3002
10.20944/preprints202301.0105.v1). 3004
10.20944/preprints202301.0088.v1). 3008
20. Henry Garrett, “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s Recognitions 3009
Featuring (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperAlliances”, Preprints 3010
2022, 2022120549 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202212.0549.v1). 3011
21. Henry Garrett, “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperAlliances With SuperHyperDefensive 3012
and SuperHyperOffensive Type-SuperHyperSet On (Neutrosophic) 3013
SuperHyperGraph With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s 3014
Recognitions And Related (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperClasses”, Preprints 2022, 3015
2022120540 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202212.0540.v1). 3016
22. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperGirth on SuperHyperGraph and Neutrosophic 3017
SuperHyperGraph With SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s Recognitions”, 3018
Preprints 2022, 2022120500 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202212.0500.v1). 3019
23. Henry Garrett, “Some SuperHyperDegrees and Co-SuperHyperDegrees on 3020
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs and SuperHyperGraphs Alongside Applications 3021
in Cancer’s Treatments”, Preprints 2022, 2022120324 (doi: 3022
10.20944/preprints202212.0324.v1). 3023
24. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperDominating and SuperHyperResolving on 3024
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs And Their Directions in Game Theory and 3025
Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses”, Preprints 2022, 2022110576 (doi: 3026
10.20944/preprints202211.0576.v1). 3027
25. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Contradiction By Hyper Detection of 3028
SuperHyperDefensive In Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and Neutrosophic 3029
SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.13397.09446). 3030
26. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 3031
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperDominating As Hyper Closing On Super 3032
Messy”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.21510.45125). 3033
27. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Missing By Hyper Searching Of 3034
SuperHyperDominating In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 3035
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperConnected As Hyper Group On Super Surge”, 3038
ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.11758.69441). 3039
29. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Outbreak By Hyper Collections Of 3040
SuperHyperConnected In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 3041
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperTotal As Hyper Covering On Super 3044
Infections”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.19360.87048). 3045
31. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Extremism By Hyper Treatments Of 3046
SuperHyperTotal In Cancer’s Recognition with (Neutrosophic) 3047
32. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Isolation By Hyper Perfectness Of 3049
SuperHyperPerfect In Cancer’s Recognition with (Neutrosophic) 3050
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperPerfect As Hyper Idealism On Super 3053
Vacancy”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.19911.37285). 3054
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperJoin As Hyper Separations On Super Sorts”, 3056
35. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super connections By Hyper disconnections Of 3058
SuperHyperJoin In Cancer’s Recognition with (Neutrosophic) 3059
36. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Mixed-Devastations By Hyper Decisions 3061
Of SuperHyperDuality In Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and Neutrosophic 3062
37. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition As (Neutrosophic) 3064
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperDuality As Hyper Imaginations On Super 3065
Mixed-Illustrations”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.33275.80161). 3066
38. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition As (Neutrosophic) 3067
SuperHyperGraph By Path SuperHyperK-Number As Hyper Correction On 3068
Super Faults”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.30182.50241). 3069
39. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Reflections By Hyper Rotations Of Path 3070
SuperHyperK-Number In Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and Neutrosophic 3071
40. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas As Hyper Deformations On Super Chains In 3073
Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph By 3074
SuperHyperDensity”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.13444.60806). 3075
41. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas As Hyper Ignorance By SuperHyperDensity On 3076
Super Resistances In Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and Neutrosophic 3077
SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi:10.13140/RG.2.2.16800.05123). 3078
42. Henry Garrett, “New Research On Cancer’s Recognition and Neutrosophic 3079
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian SuperHyperCycles and Hamiltonian Sets As 3080
Hyper Covering Versus Super separations-VI”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 3081
10.13140/RG.2.2.29913.80482). 3082
Hyper Covering Versus Super separations-V”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 3085
10.13140/RG.2.2.33269.24809). 3086
Hyper Covering Versus Super separations-IV”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 3089
10.13140/RG.2.2.34946.96960). 3090
45. Henry Garrett, “A Research On Cancer’s Recognition and Neutrosophic 3091
Hyper Covering Versus Super separations-III”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 3093
10.13140/RG.2.2.14814.31040). 3094
Hyper Covering Versus Super separations-II”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 3097
10.13140/RG.2.2.15653.17125). 3098
Hyper Covering Versus Super separations-I”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 3101
10.13140/RG.2.2.25719.50089). 3102
48. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Disruptions In Cancer’s Extreme 3103
Recognition As Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph By Hyper Plans Called 3104
SuperHyperConnectivities”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 3105
10.13140/RG.2.2.29441.94562). 3106
49. Henry Garrett, “Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition As Neutrosophic 3107
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperConnectivities As Hyper Diagnosis On Super 3108
Mechanism”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.17252.24968). 3109
50. Henry Garrett,“Cancer’s Recognition and (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph By 3110
the Criteria of Eulerian and Hamiltonian Type-Sets As Hyper Modified Cycles 3111
On Super Mess”, ResearchGate 2023,(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.16652.59525). 3112
51. Henry Garrett,“Eulerian and Hamiltonian In Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition 3113
and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph On Super Interactions By Hyper 3114
Extensions of Cycles”, ResearchGate 2023,(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.34583.24485). 3115
52. Henry Garrett, “Some Super Hyper Degrees and Co-Super Hyper Degrees on 3116
Neutrosophic Super Hyper Graphs And Super Hyper Graphs Alongside 3117
Applications in Cancer’s Treatments”, J Math Techniques Comput Math 2(1) 3118
(2023) 35-47. 3119
53. Henry Garrett,“SuperHyperGirth Type-Results on extreme SuperHyperGirth 3120
theory and (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs Toward Cancer’s extreme 3121
Recognition”, Preprints 2023, 2023010396 (doi: 3122
10.20944/preprints202301.0396.v1). 3123
54. Henry Garrett,“Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Warns Hyper Landmark of 3124
neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth In Super Type-Versions of Cancer’s neutrosophic 3125
Recognition”, Preprints 2023, 2023010395 (doi: 3126
10.20944/preprints202301.0395.v1). 3127
55. Henry Garrett,“The Constructions of (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs on the 3128
Cancer’s Recognition in The Confrontation With Super Attacks In Hyper 3129
Situations By Implementing (Neutrosophic) 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in The 3130
Technical Approaches to Neutralize SuperHyperViews”, ResearchGate 2023, 3131
(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.26240.51204). 3132
56. Henry Garrett,“(Neutrosophic) 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing As the 3133
Entrepreneurs on Cancer’s Recognitions To Fail Forcing Style As the Super 3134
Classes With Hyper Effects In The Background of the Framework is So-Called 3135
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 3136
10.13140/RG.2.2.12818.73925). 3137
57. Henry Garrett,“Super Actions On The Types of Hyper Levels In The Sensible 3138
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth On Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and 3139
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 2023,(doi: 3140
10.13140/RG.2.2.26836.88960). 3141
58. Henry Garrett,“SuperHyperGirth Approaches on the Super Challenges on the 3142
Cancer’s Recognition In the Hyper Model of (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, 3143
ResearchGate 2023,(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.36745.93289). 3144
59. Henry Garrett,“Extreme SuperHyperClique as the Firm Scheme of 3145
Confrontation under Cancer’s Recognition as the Model in The Setting of 3146
10.20944/preprints202301.0308.v1). 3148
60. Henry Garrett,“Uncertainty On The Act And Effect Of Cancer Alongside The 3149
Foggy Positions Of Cells Toward Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperClique inside 3150
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Titled Cancer’s Recognition”, Preprints 2023, 3151
2023010282 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0282.v1). 3152
61. Henry Garrett,“Neutrosophic Version Of Separates Groups Of Cells In Cancer’s 3153
Recognition On Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010267 3154
(doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0267.v1).). 3155
62. Henry Garrett, “The Shift Paradigm To Classify Separately The Cells and 3156
Affected Cells Toward The Totality Under Cancer’s Recognition By New 3157
Multiple Definitions On the Sets Polynomials Alongside Numbers In The 3158
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperMatching Theory Based on SuperHyperGraph and 3159
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph”, Preprints 2023, 2023010265 (doi: 3160
10.20944/preprints202301.0265.v1). 3161
63. Henry Garrett,“Breaking the Continuity and Uniformity of Cancer In The 3162
Worst Case of Full Connections With Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique In 3163
Cancer’s Recognition Applied in (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 3164
2023, 2023010262,(doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0262.v1). 3165
64. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperStable as the Survivors on the 3166
Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition Based on Uncertainty to All Modes in 3167
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010240 (doi: 3168
10.20944/preprints202301.0240.v1). 3169
65. Henry Garrett, “Extremism of the Attacked Body Under the Cancer’s 3170
Circumstances Where Cancer’s Recognition Titled (Neutrosophic) 3171
SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010224, (doi: 3172
10.20944/preprints202301.0224.v1). 3173
66. Henry Garrett,“SuperHyperMatching By (R-)Definitions And Polynomials To 3174
Monitor Cancer’s Recognition In Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”, 3175
ResearchGate 2023,(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.35061.65767). 3176
67. Henry Garrett,“The Focus on The Partitions Obtained By Parallel Moves In 3177
The Cancer’s Extreme Recognition With Different Types of Extreme 3178
SuperHyperMatching Set and Polynomial on (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, 3179
68. Henry Garrett,“Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique Decides the Failures on the 3181
SuperHyperModels Named (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 3183
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.32530.73922). 3184
69. Henry Garrett,“Indeterminacy On The All Possible Connections of Cells In 3185
Front of Cancer’s Attacks In The Terms of Neutrosophic Failed 3186
SuperHyperClique on Cancer’s Recognition called Neutrosophic 3187
SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.15897.70243). 3188
70. Henry Garrett,“Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique Decides the Failures on the 3189
SuperHyperModels Named (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 3191
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.32530.73922). 3192
Recognitions And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 3194
2023010105 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0105.v1). 3195
72. Henry Garrett,“Perfect Directions Toward Idealism in Cancer’s Neutrosophic 3196
Recognition Forwarding Neutrosophic SuperHyperClique on Neutrosophic 3197
73. Henry Garrett,“Demonstrating Complete Connections in Every Embedded 3199
Regions and Sub-Regions in the Terms of Cancer’s Recognition and 3200
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperClique”, 3201
10.20944/preprints202301.0105.v1). 3206
10.20944/preprints202301.0088.v1). 3210
76. Henry Garrett,“Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic Regions titled 3211
neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperStable in Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition 3212
modeled in the Form of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 2023, 3213
(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.17385.36968). 3214
Neutrosophic Recognition And Beyond”, Preprints 2023, 2023010044 3217
Well- SuperHyperModelled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 3219
2023010043 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0043.v1). 3220
79. Henry Garrett, “Using the Tool As (Neutrosophic) Failed SuperHyperStable To 3221
SuperHyperModel Cancer’s Recognition Titled (Neutrosophic) 3222
Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable To Act on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognitions In 3225
Special ViewPoints”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.11447.80803). 3226
Well-SuperHyperModelled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 3228
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.35774.77123). 3229
Neutrosophic Recognition And Beyond ”, ResearchGate 2022, (doi: 3232
10.13140/RG.2.2.36141.77287). 3233
Recognitions And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 2022, (doi: 3235
10.13140/RG.2.2.29430.88642). 3236
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 2022, (doi: 3239
10.13140/RG.2.2.11369.16487). 3240
Featuring (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperAlliances”, Preprints 3242
2022, 2022120549 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202212.0549.v1). 3243
Featuring (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperAlliances”, 3245
87. Henry Garrett, “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperAlliances With 3247
Cancer’s Recognitions And Related (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperClasses”, 3250
88. Henry Garrett, “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperAlliances With 3252
Cancer’s Recognitions And Related (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperClasses”, 3255
ResearchGate 2022 (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.20993.12640). 3262
91. Henry Garrett,“Some SuperHyperDegrees and Co-SuperHyperDegrees on 3263
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs and SuperHyperGraphs Alongside 3264
Applications in Cancer’s Treatments”, Preprints 2022, 2022120324 (doi: 3265
10.20944/preprints202212.0324.v1). 3266
92. Henry Garrett, “Some SuperHyperDegrees and Co-SuperHyperDegrees on 3267
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs And SuperHyperGraphs Alongside 3268
Applications in Cancer’s Treatments”, ResearchGate 2022 (doi: 3269
10.13140/RG.2.2.23123.04641). 3270
Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses”, Preprints 2022, 2022110576 (doi: 3273
10.20944/preprints202211.0576.v1). 3274
Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses”, ResearchGate 2022 (doi: 3277
10.13140/RG.2.2.23324.56966). 3278
95. Henry Garrett, “Basic Neutrosophic Notions Concerning SuperHyperDominating 3279
and Neutrosophic SuperHyperResolving in SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 3280
2022 (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.29173.86244). 3281
96. Henry Garrett, “Initial Material of Neutrosophic Preliminaries to Study Some 3282
Neutrosophic Notions Based on Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) in 3283
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)”, ResearchGate 2022 (doi: 3284
10.13140/RG.2.2.25385.88160). 3285
97. Henry Garrett, (2022). “Beyond Neutrosophic Graphs”, Ohio: E-publishing: 3286
Educational Publisher 1091 West 1st Ave Grandview Heights, Ohio 43212 3287
United States. ISBN: 979-1-59973-725-6 3288
(http://fs.unm.edu/BeyondNeutrosophicGraphs.pdf). 3289
98. Henry Garrett, (2022). “Neutrosophic Duality”, Florida: GLOBAL 3290
KNOWLEDGE - Publishing House 848 Brickell Ave Ste 950 Miami, Florida 3291
33131 United States. ISBN: 978-1-59973-743-0 3292
(http://fs.unm.edu/NeutrosophicDuality.pdf). 3293
View publication stats

New Ideas On Super Gradient by Hyper K-Class of SuperHyperK-Number in Cancer's Recognition With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

New Ideas On Super Gradient by Hyper K-Class of SuperHyperK-Number in Cancer's Recognition With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

New Ideas In Cancer's Recognition And Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph By

Preprint · February 2023

332 PUBLICATIONS 4,296 CITATIONS

Neutrosophic Graphs View project

Featured Articles View project

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.

New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 2

SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperK-Number As Hyper 3

k-Partition On Super Layers 4

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · 6

DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA 7

In this scientific research, (Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic 9

SuperHyperK-Number). Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is an 10

K-Numbered pair S = (V, E). Consider a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet 11

V 0 = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vs } and E 0 = {E1 , E2 , . . . , Ez }. Then either V 0 or E 0 is called 12

|E 0 | = k, ∀Ea ∈ EN SHG \ E 0 , ∃Eb ∈ E 0 , ∃Vc ∈ V, Vc ∈ Ea , Eb ; Neutrosophic 14

|E 0 | = k, ∀Ea ∈ EN SHG \ E 0 , ∃Eb ∈ E 0 , ∃Vc ∈ V, Vc ∈ Ea , Eb ; and 16

|Ei |NEUTROSOPIC CARDINALITY = |Ej |NEUTROSOPIC CARDINALITY ; Neutrosophic 17

v-SuperHyperK-Number if |V 0 | = k, ∀Va ∈ VN SHG \ V 0 , ∃Vb ∈ V 0 , ∃Ec ∈ E, Va , Vb ∈ Vc ; 18

|V 0 | = k, ∀Va ∈ VN SHG \ V 0 , ∃Vb ∈ V 0 , ∃Ec ∈ E, Va , Vb ∈ Vc ; and 20

|Vi |NEUTROSOPIC CARDINALITY = |Vj |NEUTROSOPIC CARDINALITY ; Neutrosophic 21

SuperHyperK-Number if it’s either of Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperK-Number, 22

Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperK-Number, Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperK-Number, and 23

Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperK-Number. ((Neutrosophic) SuperHyperK-Number). 24

Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is an K-Numbered pair 25

S = (V, E). Consider a Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) E = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vs }. 26

Then E is called an Extreme SuperHyperK-Number if it’s either of Neutrosophic 27

e-SuperHyperK-Number, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperK-Number, Neutrosophic 28

v-SuperHyperK-Number, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperK-Number and C(N SHG) 29

for an Extreme SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the maximum Extreme cardinality 30

of an Extreme SuperHyperSet S of high Extreme cardinality of the Extreme 31

SuperHyperEdges in the consecutive Extreme sequence of Extreme SuperHyperEdges 32

and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form the Extreme 33

SuperHyperK-Number; a Neutrosophic SuperHyperK-Number if it’s either of 34

Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperK-Number, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperK-Number, 35

Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperK-Number, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperK-Number and 36

C(N SHG) for a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the maximum 37

Neutrosophic cardinality of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges of a Neutrosophic 38

SuperHyperSet S of high Neutrosophic cardinality consecutive Neutrosophic 39

SuperHyperEdges and Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that they form the 40

Neutrosophic SuperHyperK-Number; an Extreme SuperHyperK-Number 41

SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either of Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperK-Number, 42

Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperK-Number, Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperK-Number, and 43

Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperK-Number and C(N SHG) for an Extreme 44

SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the Extreme SuperHyperPolynomial contains the 45

Extreme coefficients defined as the Extreme number of the maximum Extreme 46

cardinality of the Extreme SuperHyperEdges of an Extreme SuperHyperSet S of high 47

Extreme cardinality consecutive Extreme SuperHyperEdges and Extreme 48

Extreme power is corresponded to its Extreme coefficient; a Neutrosophic 50

SuperHyperK-Number SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either of Neutrosophic 51

e-SuperHyperK-Number, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperK-Number, Neutrosophic 52

v-SuperHyperK-Number, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperK-Number and C(N SHG) 53

for a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the Neutrosophic 54

SuperHyperPolynomial contains the Neutrosophic coefficients defined as the 55

Neutrosophic number of the maximum Neutrosophic cardinality of the Neutrosophic 56

SuperHyperEdges of a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of high Neutrosophic cardinality 57

consecutive Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges and Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such 58

corresponded to its Neutrosophic coefficient; an Extreme V-SuperHyperK-Number if it’s 60

either of Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperK-Number, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperK-Number, 61

Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperK-Number, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperK-Number and 62

cardinality of an Extreme SuperHyperSet S of high Extreme cardinality of the Extreme 64

SuperHyperVertices in the consecutive Extreme sequence of Extreme SuperHyperEdges 65