The document discusses Porter's Five Forces model as it applies to the automotive sector. It analyzes each of the five forces: 1) bargaining power of buyers is high as customers can demand lower prices and higher quality, 2) bargaining power of suppliers is moderate as there are many suppliers but suppliers of advanced technologies have more power, 3) rivalry among existing competitors is high since there are many large competitors of similar size investing in new technologies, 4) threat of substitute products is moderate as electric vehicles pose a growing threat, and 5) threat of new entrants is moderate due to established brands and distribution networks of incumbent companies.
The document discusses Porter's Five Forces model as it applies to the automotive sector. It analyzes each of the five forces: 1) bargaining power of buyers is high as customers can demand lower prices and higher quality, 2) bargaining power of suppliers is moderate as there are many suppliers but suppliers of advanced technologies have more power, 3) rivalry among existing competitors is high since there are many large competitors of similar size investing in new technologies, 4) threat of substitute products is moderate as electric vehicles pose a growing threat, and 5) threat of new entrants is moderate due to established brands and distribution networks of incumbent companies.
The document discusses Porter's Five Forces model as it applies to the automotive sector. It analyzes each of the five forces: 1) bargaining power of buyers is high as customers can demand lower prices and higher quality, 2) bargaining power of suppliers is moderate as there are many suppliers but suppliers of advanced technologies have more power, 3) rivalry among existing competitors is high since there are many large competitors of similar size investing in new technologies, 4) threat of substitute products is moderate as electric vehicles pose a growing threat, and 5) threat of new entrants is moderate due to established brands and distribution networks of incumbent companies.
1. Bargaining Power of Buyers: Customers can influence the way
competitors rival against each other for profit. They hold what is considered bargaining supremacy, which enables them to demand higher quality of products and force down pricing. The force of bargaining supremacy of customers often results in playing competitors off each other in the fight to make profits. Most of the time it is done so at the expense of industry profits. This force is clearly evident in the auto industry, as we see companies such as Honda deliver vehicles exhibiting the similar qualities of luxury in comparison to Lexus for a price that is far less. Their efforts are all driven by the expectations of the customer, which gives them the advantage of controlling price and quality.
The force behind the bargaining power of customer accumulates
when the company purchases in large volume, enabling cost efficiency. Also, when they lower their profits, which not only creates an incentive of lowering purchase cost, but attracts the customer through added value. The customer is always thinking about what is in it for them. When they see added value towards their purchase, it attracts them more. Although the company lowers their profits, there exists the potential of increased sales from attracting more customers, making it a reasonable decision to sustain and even increase business revenue.
2. Bargaining Power of Suppliers: The automotive industry has
many suppliers. Five of the world’s biggest suppliers are Bosch, Denso, Magna, Continental and ZF Friedrichshafen, according to the Automotive News list of 2018 (Chappell, 2019). How suppliers strive to maintain control in bargaining is through rising prices or reducing the quality of goods for cost efficiency. Costs in materials has gone up over the years, and the struggle to reach a happy medium between customers and managers is an ultimate challenge.
One of the factors which makes suppliers powerful in bargaining
is when they are dominated by few companies. This gives them more leverage in negotiating costs and pricing. They also have the advantage in bargaining when they have built up switching costs, which are basically fixed costs the buyers face in changing suppliers. This discourages companies from turning to another supplier immediately after a simple dissatisfaction in negotiations. Suppliers rely on strategy to stay ahead in the market, and technology is currently the dominating factor in their strategy (Chappell, 2019).
Suppliers are currently facing the challenge of fulfilling the need
to support the evolving changes within the automotive industry – electronic vehicles and autonomous driving. The automotive industry is going through major changes as they move from traditional auto manufacturing to more technically advanced production. Four sources of change as of today are the electric vehicle (EV), autonomous vehicles (AV), connected cars, and transportation as a service (TaaS) (Teece, 2018). One of the most successful emerging companies to enter the market with these changes is Tesla. The company managed to rise in revenue through the sales of their electric vehicle (EV).
3. Rivalry among Existing Competitors: ‘Competition breeds
excellence’ is a mantra I have always utilized to strive persistently for success. The competitiveness within the automotive industry in the United States is relatively large. There are laws and regulations set to enforce fairness competition between businesses, however, the rivalry between entities can often be intense. One of the major factors that intensifies rivalry in competition is when there are numerous competitors equal in size and power. General Motors, Ford and Chrysler are prime examples of large competitors striving to dominate the market (Porter, 1979).
Strategy is what drives business leaders in their strive for
maximum profits. Rivals often break out between competitors due to the diversity in strategy and personality. Business leaders are determined to develop different ideas on how to compete and stay ahead of the game. These struggles affect the industry and the market in some shape or form. Ultimately, the competitiveness of companies can sometimes bring forth change within the industry.
Autonomous vehicles (AV) is an idea under development that is
literally changing the mindset of competitors within the industry. The grasp of just imagining the ability to travel long distances without the hassle of having to drive is currently what is attracts most customers of today. The idea of saving time commuting from place to place in a much more productive method is highly valued and what many business leaders in the automotive industry are slowly pursuing. Debates are ongoing whether autonomous vehicles (AV) have sufficient potential to change the economics of the industry. The fixed costs for autonomous vehicles (AV) are just too high, which becomes another factor of intense rivalry in competition. In my opinion, its only a matter of time.
4. Threat of Substitutes Products: When auto manufacturing
companies make their product, they face the threat of product substitution by their competitors. General Motors’s challenge was to ensure the quality and uniqueness of their vehicles was more than sufficient to surpass their competitors, regardless of pricing. Customer loyalty is earned when a company provides quality in resources for reasonable pricing. However, competitors gain the advantage when the product can be substituted and provide equal utilization for a lesser price. This occurs when products lack uniqueness and quality. The problem General Motors faced during the economical recession was how their senior leadership allowed the company’s vehicle portfolio to lag in quality, becoming less relevant to customers (Senter Jr. & McManus, 2013). They continued to create products regardless of the socioeconomic changes in the population. Income distribution tightened up during the economic recession, and customers were driven to purchase economy vehicles, which had very few to offer in their product line. General Motors focused on the distribution of larger vehicles, such as SUV’s or Trucks, which were higher in price range for consumers. They were able to eventually overcome the threat once their product line was addressed, and began to align products closely with the income distribution in the national market.
5. Threat of New Entrants: Importance of reputation or brand
loyalty:
Reputation is a crucial barrier to entry.
1. Already established brand equity of major players.
2. For those players customer has high willingness
3. Other established company can enter through mergers
Entrance access to location/ distribution channel
1. Factors like access to raw material, technology and distribution
channel are concerned and are not easily accessible
2. New regulating policies pertaining to fuel emission, efficiency and a
projected efficiency rating, recession etc, act as a barrier to new entrant 4. New entrant has to compete with major players like Maruti, Hyundai, etc. which provides dealership or service network for their vehicles in remote areas of country.
5. Saturated urban demand and huge market of countryside the
distribution channels going to play a significant role in future.