Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Teixell 2005 Effects of Mantle Upwelling in A Compressional Setting - The Atlas Mountains of Morocco
Teixell 2005 Effects of Mantle Upwelling in A Compressional Setting - The Atlas Mountains of Morocco
Teixell 2005 Effects of Mantle Upwelling in A Compressional Setting - The Atlas Mountains of Morocco
ABSTRACT
We discuss the implications of a lithospheric model of the contemporaneous to compression, the absence of large crustal
Moroccan Atlas Mountains based on topography, heat flow, roots to support elevation, the scarce development of foreland
gravity and geoid anomalies, taking into account the regional basins, and a marked geoid high. The modelled lithosphere
geology. The NW African cratonic lithosphere, some 160– thinning is related to a thermal upwelling constrained between
180 km thick, thins to c. 80 km beneath the Atlas fold-thrust the Iberia–Africa convergent plate boundary and the Saharan
belts, in contrast with the shortening regime prevailing there craton.
since the early Cenozoic. This fact explains several geological
and geophysical features as high topography with modest Terra Nova, 17, 456–461, 2005
tectonic shortening, the occurrence of alkaline magmatism
AS
I Gh levels.
TL
T Middle 15-6
Rekkame Based on the analysis of teleseismic
.A
N Massif Atlas 1.8-0.5
ID
A N Central 40-45 HIGH p-wave travel times, Seber et al. (1996)
M
L A 1 PLATEAUX
T E suggested that the lithosphere beneath
A C T A Mi
O M ESE the Atlas Mountains is thin or abnor-
Tamazert mally hot. Seismic tomography shows
40-45
32 N H low velocities in the upper mantle
HIG
AS beneath much of Europe and NW
Ma A L
T
Africa (Hoernle et al., 1995; Bijwaard
Em
and Spakman, 2000). Although the
Siroua Sarho velocity structure of this zone is mark-
10.8-2.1 9.6-2.8
edly heterogeneous, in the models the
LA S Atlas Mountains lie over a velocity
I - AT low. Heat flow in Morocco varies
ANT
from 40 to 100 mW m)2 (Rimi,
SAHARAN 1999), although the Atlas Mountains
0 100 200 km CRATON lack a detailed sampling. On the basis
of a punctual measurement of
28 N
86 mW m)2, Ramdani (1998) sugges-
ted that the lithosphere beneath the
Fig. 1 Location map of the study area, showing topography, tectonic units and southern High Atlas could be as thin
Cenozoic magmatism (black areas). Straight solid lines indicate the position of the as 50 km. In addition, the Atlas
modelled profiles of Fig. 2; dashed grey line marks the eastern limit of the mid Eocene
region is the locus of a strong positive
marine limestone of the Atlas domain (Em). Shaded-relief from GTOPO30; absolute
geoid anomaly which, combined with
ages of magmatism after Tisserant et al. (1976), Harmand and Cantagrel (1984),
Berrahma and Hernandez (1985), Berrahma et al. (1993), Rachdi et al. (1997), El
a relatively weak negative Bouguer
Azzouzi et al. (1999), and Wagner et al. (2003). Localities: Ra: Rabat; Mi: Midelt; anomaly (Fig. 2), indicates that the
Ma: Marrakech; Gh: Gharb basin. Maps of volcanic ages of the Canary Islands, some excess of mass related to topography
500 km to the SW of the Atlas coast, can be found in Anguita and Hernan (2000) and is compensated by a deep-seated mass
Carracedo et al. (2002). Detailed Bouguer and free-air gravity maps of the Atlas deficiency. A recent integrated litho-
domain are presented in Ayarza et al. (2005). spheric model running from SW Ibe-
ria to the Saharan craton in a NW–SE
direction reveals a prominent litho-
spheric thickening beneath the Gulf of
Cadiz-Gharb basin region followed by
also suggested on the same basis for the a thinning beneath the Atlas Moun-
Geophysical evidence
Eocene carbonatites (Mourtada et al., tains (Zeyen et al., 2005) thus sup-
1997; Wagner et al., 2003). This mag- The knowledge of the crustal structure porting the interpretations inferred
matism defines a separate district from beneath the Atlas Mountains relies from tectonics, seismic tomography
that of the westernmost Mediterranean mainly on gravity and seismic refrac- and potential fields.
(Betics, Alboran, Rif), which shows a tion (Makris et al., 1985; Tadili et al.,
shift from calc-alkaline to alkaline 1986; Wigger et al., 1992; Ayarza
Lithospheric modelling
character in Pliocene times (e.g. Dug- et al., 2005). The crust in the areas
gen et al., 2003, and references therein). adjacent to the High and Middle Atlas Based on a 2D finite element algo-
On the contrary, the Atlas magmatism is 33–36 km thick. A receiver function rithm developed by Zeyen and Fern-
is roughly coeval and has the same station near Midelt (Fig. 1) yielded àndez (1994) and Zeyen et al. (2005)
petrological and isotopic signature as punctual values of 36 and 39 km we have modelled two regional
that of the Canary Islands, suggesting a (Sandvol et al., 1998; Van der Meijde lithospheric transects (profiles I and
common mantle reservoir (Anguita et al., 2003). The crust beneath the II), which together with profile III
and Hernan, 2000). Middle Atlas has comparable thick- taken from Zeyen et al. (2005), have
60 60 60
Heat flow
(mW m–2)
Heat flow
(mW m–2)
Heat flow
(mW m–2)
40 40 40 a
300 300 300
200 200 200
b
b
100 100 100
Bouguer
0 0 b 0
Bouguer
Bouguer
Gravity (mGal)
–100 –100 –100
Gravity (mGal)
Gravity (mGal)
16 16 16 c
12
c 12
c 12
8 8 8
4 4 4
0 0 0
Geoid (m)
Geoid (m)
Geoid (m)
–4 –4 –4
Effects of mantle upwelling in a compressional setting • A. Teixell et al.
Topography (m)
Topography (m)
Topography (m)
0 0 0
20 20 20
40 40 40
60 60 60
80 80 80
100 100 100
120 120 120
Depth (km)
Depth (km)
Depth (km)
Sediments
140 Sediments 140 Sediments 140 Upper crust
e e e
160 Upper crust 160 Upper crust 160 Middle crust
180 Lower/oceanic crust 180 Lower crust 180 Volcanics/lower crust
Mantle lithosphere Mantle lithosphere Mantle lithosphere
200 200 200
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
Fig. 2 Lithospheric models along the selected profiles. Panels (a), (b), (c) and (d) compare the observed values (open circles with error bars) to modelling results (continuous
color lines). Panel (e) indicates the lithospheric structure. Profile III is after Zeyen et al. (2005) (see this publication for modelling details).
.............................................................................................................................................................
Terra Nova, Vol 17, No. 5, 456–461