Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Writing File Review
Writing File Review
Writing File Review
FIRST
NEW EDITION Student answers
Review
(Test 2, Part 2, Question 3)
Answer A: Good answer
Conclusion
In my opinion, this is a great TV show due to its visual and audio content. Therefore I
reccommend it to people of all ages as it is very educational and interesting.
Examiner comments
This answer gives clear information about the content of the programme and the locations where it was
filmed. The student explains clearly why the programme is interesting, and why they would recommend it
to people of all ages.
The article is well organised in clear paragraphs. The student has used sub-headings for clarity, though
they are not essential when writing a review.
There is a good range of structures and vocabulary. The reader would be informed and entertained.
Review
(Test 2, Part 2, Question 3)
Answer B: Satisfactory answer
Wild Life
I am really into documentaries and TV programmes about nature and enviroimental topics,
but my favorite so far is “Wild Life”, it is very complete in content and the quality of the
images is grate.
This show is a must if you are very likely to watch documentaries about wild life. It shows
how animals do to survive to other animals. There is a group of people following the animals
with a camera so they tell you the situation and make it look like you are right there. In each
episode the location changes but it is mostly in Africa or the Antartic continent.
However, in my opinion it is not the best show for young children. Some of the content they
show in the programme includes the death or violent scenes. Maybe when the kids are older
it is okay for them to watch it so they can get informed about how real world is.
In my opinion, this is a great show to be informed about wild life but you can watch it if you
are older than ten years old.
Examiner comments
This answer is organised into paragraphs, with a clear introduction and conclusion.
However, although it gives some information about the content and locations of the programme, it does
not provide much detail about either . The reader would feel the article is not informative enough. The
writer explains clearly why the programme is not for young children but does not say specifically people of
which age would enjoy it.
There is a good range of structures and vocabulary, such as This show is a must and . However, there are a
few errors in the writing, such as how animals do.
Review
(Test 2, Part 2, Question 3)
Answer C: Unsatisfactory answer
Examiner comments
This answer is very difficult to follow because it is one long paragraph. There is no attempt at
organisation at all.
The student explains the content of the programme in some detail, but fails to mention the locations
where it was filmed.
They use some interesting vocabulary but there are errors which may cause confusion , such as impression
to be, in few moment, elders people and explained good.
This is an example of an article that could have been much better if the writer had organised the content
into clear paragraphs.